For 20,312 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,400 out of 20312
-
Mixed: 8,446 out of 20312
-
Negative: 2,466 out of 20312
20312
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Though its principal figure, the novelist, playwright and essayist James Baldwin, is a man who has been dead for nearly 30 years, you would be hard-pressed to find a movie that speaks to the present moment with greater clarity and force, insisting on uncomfortable truths and drawing stark lessons from the shadows of history.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 2, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
The director, Taylor Hackford, never makes any of this pop, which isn’t a surprise given the material.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 2, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Kenny
A more finely focused treatment would have made a much better summation of, or introduction to, Mr. Naharin’s work.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 1, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
We are not exactly in the present and not precisely in the past, but in a dreamy cinematic space where distinctions of genre and tone are pleasantly (and sometimes shockingly) blurred.- The New York Times
- Posted Feb 1, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Rachel Saltz
Avoiding flabby subplots, Mr. Dholakia keeps Raees taut and suspenseful, even at two and a half hours, though it probably has a song too many- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Kenny
For Kubrick enthusiasts, this picture will provide a fun and sometimes moving fix.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
The characters don’t have conversations so much as helpfully recite their back stories, and the long-buried secret is soon so obvious that the movie’s last-act hysteria feels forced and a little ridiculous.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Kenny
The information here is compelling and frightening, but the movie is ham-handed.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Ben Kenigsberg
Some tragedies defy conventional representation. Unlike the play it documents, this documentary shows few signs of thinking outside the box.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Andy Webster
A lively closing dance sequence, after an earnest, underwhelming climax, pays affectionate tribute to Bollywood production numbers. But you won’t find Mr. Chan’s customary bloopers over the closing credits.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Kenny
The movie percolates enough that even when, at its climax, it shamelessly recycles a grisly punch line from 1987’s “RoboCop,” it’s kind of endearing, not least because Mr. Anderson and company make it work.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Light on plot yet heavy on chemistry, Paris 05:59 is at times a little precious. But the two leads are so believably besotted that their occasional immaturity doesn’t rankle.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
While intellectually laudable, Mr. Kelly’s determined objectivity is so distancing that it takes an inherently intriguing story (based on a 2011 article in The New York Times Magazine) and sucks the life out of it.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Ben Kenigsberg
Behemoth proceeds placidly, making it easy to become lulled. Its haunting power grows in retrospect — as if you’ve returned from a journey and can’t believe what you’ve seen.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
With exquisite patience and attention to detail, Asghar Farhadi, the writer and director, builds a solid and suspenseful plot out of ordinary incidents, and packs it with rich and resonant ideas.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
The story may not stay with you, but don’t be surprised if you come away with a strong desire to visit Florence.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
[McConaughey's] wild, abrasive and improbably delicate performance is what makes Gold watchable, even if the rest of the movie doesn’t supply sufficient reason to keep watching.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 26, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
You don’t need an animal-rights group’s boycott to give you permission to avoid A Dog’s Purpose. You can skip it just because it’s clumsily manipulative dreck.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 25, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Ray remains an unanswered, not especially compelling, question, but Mr. Keaton comes close to making you believe there’s soul to go with the fries and freneticism.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Whether together or apart, Mr. Sand and Mr. Scully seemed to be operating on a similar wavelength, and the movie gets a lot of mileage from their sometimes excellent, at times hair-raising, occasionally puckishly funny and altogether wild adventures.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Something about the strangeness of the people and the harsh indifference of the nature that surrounds them feels real, even if realism in the conventional sense may be the last thing on the filmmaker’s mind.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The Red Turtle practices a minor, gentle magic. It wants you to smile and say, “Ahh,” rather than gasp and say, “Wow.” But somehow the understatement can feel a bit overdone, as if the film were hovering over you, awaiting an expression of admiration.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Split is lurid and ludicrous, and sometimes more than a little icky in its prurient, maudlin interest in the abuse of children. It’s also absorbing and sometimes slyly funny.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Kenny
The movie is both heady (there are real thrills in the stories of exploration) and sobering (Mr. Lorius’s findings are convincing). This is a cogent, accessible cinematic delineation of an increasingly crucial problem.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Bathed in a funk of testosterone, and heaving with homophobia and misogyny, My Father Die is a trashy jewel.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Ben Kenigsberg
If Starless Dreams inspires conflicted feelings in viewers, it may be by design. It’s hard not to want to flee, and it’s hard to look away.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Ben Kenigsberg
They Call Us Monsters doesn’t shy from the consequences of the violence the prisoners were accused of (we meet a paralyzed victim of a shooting), even as it suggests that the system...proceeds almost mechanically.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Glenn Kenny
We Are the Flesh, its abundance of repellent imagery notwithstanding, has an air of the academic about it.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
Though thematically vague, thinly plotted and without a reliably sympathetic soul to cling to, the movie has a mutinous energy and an absurd, knockabout charm.- The New York Times
- Posted Jan 19, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by