For 20,313 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,401 out of 20313
-
Mixed: 8,446 out of 20313
-
Negative: 2,466 out of 20313
20313
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Neil Genzlinger
Dazzling to look at of course. But such ponderous, cliché-heavy narration.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The movie may be a little too tame in the end, but at its best it is just wild enough.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Without exaggerating their lovability or condescending to their foolishness, Mr. Siegel makes vivid, likable people out of his three protagonists as they affect one another and are affected in turn.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Much of All About Lily Chou-Chou is mesmerizing: some of its plaintiveness could make you weep. If only Mr. Iwai trusted the material enough.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
It's more of a mash note than a formal documentary, and there's nothing wrong with that.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Maintains a tone that remains as light and easygoing as the Australians living in the area.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Perhaps the most satisfying Bond movie since "The Spy Who Loved Me."- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
As End of the Century reveals even more starkly than the recent Metallica documentary, "Some Kind of Monster," harmony among band members becomes harder to sustain as the years gather, youthful enthusiasm wanes, and personalities define themselves.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
It might be tempting to regard Mr. Andrew and his collaborators as oddballs, but Mr. Earnhart's quizzical, charming movie allows us to see them, finally, as artists.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Crammed with enough melodrama to fill several soap operas.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Though a dramatic (even melodramatic) narrative eventually takes shape, what you remember is the succession of moods and observations through which it emerges.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
What makes Frequency work despite is shamelessness is the surreal aura that imbues almost every scene with a sense of heightened feeling.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
A piercingly poignant then-and-now portrait of five friends.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
The inhospitability of the land emphasizes the spare precision of the narratives and helps to give them an atavistic power, as if they were tales that had been handed down since the beginning of time.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
The movie, for all its prettiness, manages to be shallow and portentous at the same time.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
Struggles under the burden of adapting such rarefied material.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Bosley Crowther
There is a strong trace of Freudian aberration, fanaticism and iniquity. Credit Mr. Laughton with a clever and exceptionally effective job of catching the ugliness and terror of certain ignorant, small-town types.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Mr. Im's own aesthetic command is evident in the movie's wealth of beautiful, perfectly framed images of nature -- shots so full of passion and perception that they could almost be paintings themselves.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Watching this handsomely filmed, deftly edited but rather dry movie, you keep imagining the juice that a director like Pedro Almodovar could have squeezed out of the same story.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Until the end, when it begins to go soft, the movie takes two strands of soap opera convention -- a life-changing accident and an adulterous affair -- and spins their suds into gold.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
A lightweight comedy that has more than enough laughs to justify its silly, scatterbrained premise.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Walks the delicate boundary between politically inflected realism and costumed sentimentality.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
Mr. Longley makes powerful use of the techniques of cinéma vérité. The absence of voice-over narration and talking-head interviews gives his portrait of daily life under duress a riveting immediacy.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
A modest, restrained picture, as small and satisfying as one of Woody Allen's better recent efforts.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
There is a blueprint here for what should be the next wave of comedy-concert movies, but the filmmaking team has only used part of it.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Coasts to a smooth, frictionless stop, but its star doesn't; he works as if his career depended on this movie.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
A sharp critique of empty values and pointless striving.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review