For 20,269 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
46% higher than the average critic
-
5% same as the average critic
-
49% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.2 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 61
| Highest review score: | Short Cuts | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Gummo |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 9,377 out of 20269
-
Mixed: 8,428 out of 20269
-
Negative: 2,464 out of 20269
20269
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
There are dull stabs at verbal wit that leave you baffled, bored or slightly grossed out.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Mr. Lichtenstein seems to want your tears. Nothing wrong there. The problem is that, because he never settles persuasively into one groove -- you don’t believe the tears or the smiles or anything in between -- he can’t begin to approach the complex contradictions suggested by his movie’s title.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Straining to capture artistic frenzy, it descends into vulgar chaos, less a homage to Federico Fellini’s “8 ½” (its putative inspiration) than a travesty.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jeannette Catsoulis
According to the press notes, pandorum means “Orbital Dysfunctional Syndrome”; whatever that is, by the end of the movie I was convinced I had caught it.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Wears its preposterousness with a certain pride. It’s about the cat-and-mouse game between two very smart guys, and it’s perfectly happy to be as dumb as it wants.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
The scandal of Antichrist is not that it is grisly or upsetting but that it is so ponderous, so conceptually thin and so dull.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
It’s a phoned-in, gutless piece of hack work that reminds you of other, better films in the same vein.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
You might blame Nora Ephron, whose screenplay for “When Harry Met Sally” established the formula that I Hate Valentine’s Day runs into the ground. Compared with this, Ms. Ephron is Chekhov.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Try as it might to be refined and provocative, Perfume: The Story of a Murderer never rises above the pedestrian creepiness of its conceit.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
A.O. Scott
Another movie -- Matt Stone and Trey Parker's "Team America," whose wooden puppets were more compelling actors than most of the cast of 300 -- calculated the cost [of freedom] at $1.05. I would happily pay a nickel less, in quarters or arcade tokens, for a vigorous 10-minute session with the video game that 300 aspires to become.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Lawrence Van Gelder
A quintessential Renny Harlin film: a big, dumb, loud action movie.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
A film worthy neither of Mr. Keaton's talents nor even a desperate horror fan's attention.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anita Gates
The filmmakers are smart enough to keep the monster out of sight for a long time and then to show only glimpses, but a similar tactic of providing only glimpses of plot and character is disastrous.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anita Gates
Finally it becomes clear that Mr. Corley's film is meant to be a tribute to the love of theater. It has just been posing as the story of one man's finding himself.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
It's not bad enough to make you curse, but you are likely to laugh when you should scream, and to roll your eyes when you are meant to laugh.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lawrence Van Gelder
Nearly every one of the film's emotional scenes is too predictable to hit its mark, but Mr. Jones's dry delivery has its moments.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Despite Mr. Nakata's track record and the radiant presence of its star, Naomi Watts, The Ring Two is a dud.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lawrence Van Gelder
Think of it as a modern-day variant on a Shakespearean comedy, only without the verbal felicity or dramatic structure.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
The human landscape of Palindromes is a vista of grotesqueness, dishonesty and creepiness. These are qualities Mr. Solondz has explored before, but this time he fails to make them interesting, partly because he lets himself and the audience off the hook.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lawrence Van Gelder
The law of averages demands that every once in a while a movie must come along starring young nonprofessional actors who aren't very good. That's unfortunately the case in 15.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dana Stevens
The burden of the story, which is maudlin and entirely unbelievable, weighs down even the more credible performances.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Stephen Holden
Evokes a mood of tenderness. Beyond that, it is a weightless, sentimental and intellectually lazy effort from an independent filmmaker whose movies seem increasingly insubstantial.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Anita Gates
Not a shred of suspense enlivens the proceedings, and the movie's idea of humor is having a man slip and slide on a floor covered in blood.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
A most unfortunate film that combines standard documentary techniques, including talking-head interviews, with some maladroit dramatizations from Aury's life and her novel.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lawrence Van Gelder
With its heavy symbolism and awkward, lurching pace, A Hole in One leaves viewers with little more than the vague conviction - which I think I already had going in - that falling in love is better than an ice pick to the brain.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Manohla Dargis
Softer, louder and cleaner than the 1974 version, the new film sentimentalizes the prisoners and the game, filing down their sharpest edges so that winning becomes a matter of triumph rather than resistance.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Janet Maslin
The film is a labor of love for Casper Andreas, who wrote, directed and starred in this first feature. For the actors he has chosen, it's a labor of lust, with copious necking and grappling required. For the audience, it's just a labor.- The New York Times
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by