Slant Magazine's Scores

For 7,767 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 33% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 64% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 6.2 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 59
Highest review score: 100 Mulholland Dr.
Lowest review score: 0 Jojo Rabbit
Score distribution:
7767 movie reviews
    • 80 Metascore
    • 75 Critic Score
    The film does a fine job of holding a mirror to the experience of therapeutic practice.
  1. Once the film turns into a paranoid home-invasion thriller, there’s no ambiguity left to the tale.
  2. The searing images of various gulags, public executions, and private beatings will not be easily forgotten.
  3. The sheer exuberance of the story and the stylistic brio of Jeff Nichols’s direction often compensate for the film’s lack of authenticity.
  4. Anselm is ultimately an extension of Kiefer’s “protest against forgetting,” as it reminds us that art is an act of remembrance.
  5. The excitement that the film tries to generate for its main characters is disturbingly glib.
  6. By its conclusion, what we’re left with is a cinematic Frankenstein, whose disparate genre elements have been cobbled together without much consideration or fuss.
  7. Five Nights at Freddy’s has absolutely no idea what kind of ride it wants to be.
  8. As the film wears on, Diana’s personal motivations are increasingly blurred, and to the point that she comes to be defined almost exclusively by the adversity over which she triumphs.
  9. Organizing is thankless work, and even though the film, like others in its lineage, functions as an ode to the unsung workers for the revolution, it only turns that tedium to spectacle, rarely willing to truly think about organizing as, well, boring.
  10. A fascinating metacommentary courses beneath the film’s emotional storytelling surface.
  11. That liminal space between the peaks and the valleys of a person’s life is what Michael Mann is most interested in exploring.
  12. The genre trappings are familiar, but this isn’t any old horse opera.
  13. Demián Rugna’s harrowing film spares no one from the cruelty of its world.
  14. David Fincher dabbles in the pleasures of genre without ever allowing the outlandish scenario to be treated with more respect than it deserves.
  15. Killers of the Flower Moon is a three-hander on an epic canvas, a corrosive analysis of America’s colonialist and capitalist excesses as refracted through a marital melodrama in the vein of George Cukor’s Gaslight or Alfred Hitchcock’s Suspicion.
  16. Under Sora Neo’s direction, each number becomes a mini-study of Sakamoto and the grand piano he plays on.
  17. With Menus-Plaisirs Les Troisgros, Frederick Wiseman proves again to be the master poet of micro textures that speak to the macro of social infrastructure.
  18. The characters’ generational angst humanizes the film’s view of a nation at a crossroads.
  19. For Hong Sang-oo, In Our Day is a gesture toward recognizing the beautiful, awful, and uncanny.
  20. The story’s attempt at an excoriation of spectacle and empty pleasure comes off as little more than a reluctant swipe.
  21. The film proposes that, in the search for viable alternatives to techno-fascism and climate apocalypse, we might look to the margins of our world, to unfulfilled experiments (including those of cinema) and cultures supposedly left behind by history.
  22. Annie Baker’s spare dialogue style remains intact, with each line revealing of character and mood.
    • 88 Metascore
    • 75 Critic Score
    As always with Kleber Mendonça Filho, to reflect reality isn’t enough, as cinema has to find its own truth, even if it takes some imagination to get there.
  23. The journeys that Jan and Julia undergo feature such obvious narrativization that they cannot help but feel a bit out of sync with the more observation segments featuring the refugees.
  24. With Maestro, Bradley Cooper has essentially reduced Leonard Bernstein’s boundary-pushing life and legacy to the sum total of its most accessible (read: audience-friendly) elements: his interpersonal relationships.
    • 87 Metascore
    • 50 Critic Score
    Comparisons to the work of Terrence Malick and Julie Dash are inevitable, but Raven Jackson’s search for the sublime lacks both the rich philosophical inquiries of the former and the dense, lived-in specificity of the latter.
  25. In the instances where it’s not going hard, Dicks is a surprisingly flaccid affair.
  26. This flashy legal melodrama is fitfully stirring but too flabby to deliver the walloping blow that it needs.
  27. As imaginative as the film’s comedy can be, its greatest asset is Emma Stone’s ability to situate Bella Baster first as jester, then as the emotional foundation upon which the whole of Poor Things is built.

Top Trailers