Slant Magazine's Scores

For 7,792 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 33% higher than the average critic
  • 3% same as the average critic
  • 64% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 6.2 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 59
Highest review score: 100 Mulholland Dr.
Lowest review score: 0 Jojo Rabbit
Score distribution:
7792 movie reviews
  1. If the film is meant only as a pulpy genre exercise, Matt Shakman's competence in various modes actually works to strip it of any sense of coherent vision.
  2. One can chart the very moment that Victoria's existence slips out of the routine into the nightmarish, and there's no escape by temporal omission.
  3. It bridges the cautionary elements of a horror film with the wish-fulfilling platitudes of a touristy romance.
  4. The film depicts Edward Snowden's ethical dilemmas in a political vacuum that disregards America's increasingly complex security threats.
  5. Its lack of dramatic specificity places it in a precarious middle ground between exacting character study and ethereal parable.
  6. It masks depleted drama under a progression of long takes, various music cues, and a three-chapter structure that grows successively tedious.
  7. An unfocused mishmash that thrives only when it fixates on footage of actual bouts.
  8. Unable to reconcile plot with poetry, Bluebird is knitted-together by its sense of place and lived-in performances, yet unraveled by anemic false melodrama and overbearing music.
  9. Individual politicians, detectives, and mafiosi come and go so quickly that the audience doesn't have enough time to become emotionally invested in their lives and deaths.
  10. Eytan Fox opts for a thoroughly hollow rumination on pop-culture mechanics as they pertain to young, aspiring professionals.
  11. The film finds the actors' performance deficiencies functioning less as signs of authentic teenage behavior than as an incompetent carrier of plot.
  12. After its bracing opening, the film begins to indulge the worst impulses of well-meaning liberal cinema.
  13. Like Jay Roach's Game Change and Recount, the film's patina of relative apoliticism masks (or enables) its blandness of inquiry.
  14. For all of the potential, historically specific revelations regarding nation and religion, Tangerines elects to become bathetic hokum.
  15. It's a pity that no one else involved in the making of the film had Dwayne Johnson's sly intuition.
  16. Lake Bell and Simon Pegg's star wattage isn't enough to distract from the sense that their characters are almost exclusively defined by their single-ness.
  17. Sophie Hyde barely elaborates on the toll James's transition takes on him and only superficially as it affects Billie's psyche.
  18. It remains more committed to printing the uplifting legend of its title character than in actually examining the human beings underneath.
  19. Maxime Giroux's sharp filmmaking instincts aren't always supported by similarly acute dramatic instincts.
  20. Like the characters, the film's exterior flash can't conceal a glaring emptiness.
  21. The juxtaposition of courtship and violence is the film's one true coup, but Pride and Prejudice and Zombies still mistakes weaponry for agency.
  22. It rams home the main character's relentless downward spiral though an incessant parade of grandstanding stylistic flourishes.
  23. Formally, it relies on a bevy of spectacularly funny clips and a plethora of talking heads, most of which fall back on plaudits rather than sage insights.
  24. Writer-director Nae Caranfil oddly forgoes the abundant elegiac aspects of his film's factual material for a tone approaching the ebullient.
  25. Michael Showalter is content to trade They Came Together's mischievous genre deconstructionism for cheap-shot indie quirk.
  26. A work of arduous assemblage that values information over affect and zip over conviction in its ramshackle historicizing of Apple CEO Steve Jobs.
  27. It ends up feeling like an unsatisfying cautionary tale on how much detachment is too much detachment.
  28. Any hope of meaningful reflection or insight is doused by a steady drip of often redundant and banal observations.
  29. It's perched uneasily on a fence separating a rote comic sketch film from something weirder, stranger, and less engaged with offering reassuring domestic homilies.
  30. It's too busy skipping through subplots to do much more than gloss over such heady issues as the fundamental subjectivity of truth and self-identity.

Top Trailers