Way too easy and repetitive. The weak visual presentation and screwy controls just reaffirm my point here.

From bugs to just simple bad gameplay, this is one that you just have to steer clear from.

At $50, this game is a total joke.

The cut-scenes add a nice touch to the storyline, and the nearly limitless number of enemy bugs; matched with their hard armor and aggressive behavior defiantly keep the game, if nothing else, interesting.

The games biggest problem, as I have said before, is that it is coming into a market that is ridiculously over saturated with WWII and Vietnam shooters already, and it does not do enough to separate itself from the pack, so I have a feeling it will be doomed to slip by the wayside unnoticed by most.

I am sorry, I love Electronic Arts, but this game is really bad. The graphics are pretty decent, but it can’t save this game from its horrible controls.

If you have the PS2 and the EyeToy, you and your opponents can actually set your cameras up so you can see each other while you play; just like you were sitting at the table at Hannah's Casino. That is very cool.

The horrible shot controls simply aren't saved by a good presentation and online play.

Seeing as the graphics are the best part of this game, that is a very sad thing indeed, as I consider graphics to be the least important part of a game.

The problem is that they failed at making either the storyline or the action engaging and fun.

There are better puzzle games out there, and games that do not pretend to be something they are not.

The controls remind me of what "Tomb Raider" would be if it were strung out on crack. I think I can honestly say that I hate the controls in this game.

Now that this review is done I’m going to try my best to forget that I ever played this game or even worse, had to spend enough time on it to write a review about it.

You can call it sour grapes (for liking the old TMNT, not this new 2005 TMNT cartoon garbage), or you can just call it a very mediocre game.

This is one of those games when you're looking to blow off some steam or feel the need for some senseless violence, you can run to your local game rental shop and pick up for the weekend.

Seeing as the graphics are the best part of this game, that is a very sad thing indeed, as I consider graphics to be the least important part of a game.

The graphics hold the game back as most PC RPG's are better looking.

There comes a time when you should just move on. I think Tom Clancy games and the Playstation 2 should go ahead and part ways. The system just isn't powerful enough to do what I think UbiSoft really wants to do with their games.

If any more Oddworld games are brought to the GBA, I really hope that they go back to the side-scrolling format. In fact, a direct port of the original Oddworld for Playstaion wouldn't be a bad idea, and would have surely come out better than this game did.

You can call it sour grapes (for liking the old TMNT, not this new 2005 TMNT cartoon garbage), or you can just call it a very mediocre game.

The boring levels mixed with the poor control scheme suck any fun that the action in the game could provide.

The game is not horrible, but there is nothing really awesome to overcome the games bad parts.

Is it the next "DDR?" No. Will a 13 year old girl love this game? Yeah, I think so.

Not a bad fighting game. The game looks pretty nice with cool familiar backdrop levels and the characters look like the cartoon characters. It just seems clunky to play at times.

As for Torino 2006, I would look in the bargain bin for "International Winter Sports 2002" instead.

This storyline is strange and is not developed during the game at all. They should never have put a storyline in the game.

The game is hampered by very bad laggy gameplay that seems like in some of the game levels (mostly all of them) it is running at 5 fps.

The graphics in this game are everything that you've probably come to expect... from an 8-bit system. But, seeing as the Game Boy Advance is a 32-bit system, these graphics are just plain lousy.