New Times (L.A.)'s Scores
- Movies
For 639 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
52% higher than the average critic
-
1% same as the average critic
-
47% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5.3 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | Donnie Darko | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Rollerball |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 314 out of 639
-
Mixed: 210 out of 639
-
Negative: 115 out of 639
639
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Andy Klein
An amusing trifle. There are few comic staples less convincing or more timeworn than charming lunatics in love, and the only thing that lifts this film beyond TV-movie quality is Jones' performance.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Luke Y. Thompson
Not just another disposable romantic comedy, but an ambitious, overreaching mess.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Andy Klein
The film is overwrought, slow, and portentous, with confusing surreal elements and a narrative time scheme that's impossible to keep track of.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Wilonsky
Which leaves Witherspoon, that delicious pastry, to heave the movie on her small shoulders and carry it home. The load is light -- the movie weighs no more than a glass of flat champagne -- but even she can't withstand the burden.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jean Oppenheimer
The predominantly amateur cast is painful to watch, so stilted and unconvincing are the performances. Poor Roth has nobody to play against and flounders in trying to keep the ship upright. Herzog aims for a kind of operatic sweep that he fails to achieve.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gregory Weinkauf
What do you get when you cross a passé "swinger" (Will Stewart), an exhausted "lost in L.A." setting, a sloppy "screenplay" and dull "direction" (by Paul Duran)? This!- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Luke Y. Thompson
Every plot point is obvious a mile away to anyone who's ever seen a film, and made even more obvious by the fact that the camera blatantly points out clues shortly before they're put to use.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gregory Weinkauf
If only director Walter Hill and his coscreenwriter David Giler had scribbled a punch line for all these punches, this rage-in-the-cage redux would be more than merely a limp showcase of machismo so passé as to embarrass your average Australopithecus.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jean Oppenheimer
There is something distinctly self-satisfied about Amy's Orgasm that rubs the viewer the wrong way. The film should come with a warning label: Vanity project ahead!- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jean Oppenheimer
Numbingly feeble -- The dialogue is witless, the situations are lame, the humor juvenile and the chemistry between the stars nonexistent.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Luke Y. Thompson
Only Quaid, as a semiretarded horny robot, and Cleese as a fussy chauffeur hologram seem to get it. Even Murphy, as the titular nightclub big shot in outer space, forgets to be actually funny until the climax.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Wilonsky
Not strong enough to stomach this leather-clad jerk-off session, which Miramax dumped onto Paramount in a rare case of common sense.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gregory Weinkauf
Mostly this happy train wreck feels like a longer, better movie that was chopped up and reassembled by retarded monkeys; what should have been a rush instead feels rushed.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Luke Y. Thompson
What it lacks are solid performances, save Slater's game attempt to take everything seriously.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Luke Y. Thompson
Lansdown has a pretty good score by Atli Orvarsson... Nope, nothing else nice to say.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
- New Times (L.A.)
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Wilonsky
This limp gender-bender-baller from a first-time director and rookie screenwriter steals wholesale from that 1982's "Tootsie," forgetting only to retain a single laugh.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Wilonsky
Warner Bros. is presumably aiming this movie not at children but at full-grown dopers with bad munchies glued to the Cartoon Network. Dude, pass the Scooby snacks.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Wilonsky
If this it supposed to be comedy, why isn't it ever, for one second, funny?- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Luke Y. Thompson
You probably saw this film the last time around, when it was called "Sleeping With the Enemy." This one merely adds a better car chase and more ass-kicking.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Wilonsky
It's an exceptionally dreary and overwrought bit of work, every bit as imperious as Katzenberg's "The Prince of Egypt" from 1998.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Andy Klein
Boll uses a lot of quick cutting and blurry step-printing to goose things up, but dopey dialogue and sometimes inadequate performances kill the effect.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Luke Y. Thompson
Even those looking to catch a few Diane Lane tit shots will be so exhausted by the endless nothingness between each one that it won't be worth it.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Robert Wilonsky
An ugly-duckling tale so hideously and clumsily told it feels accidental. Surely, no one PLANNED something this disastrously unfunny.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Andy Klein
What's particularly scary about Hollywood Ending, however, is that its flaws are exactly the sort of problems that often afflict aging directors, flaws that we've never seen in Allen before -- bad comic timing, slack pacing, an unsteady control of tone, a reliance on jokes that have long since become clichés.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Luke Y. Thompson
Mandel Holland's direction is uninspired, and his scripting unsurprising, but the performances by Phifer and Black are ultimately winning.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Bill Gallo
Say what you want about Hollywood losing its way in recent years, there's something beautiful about moviemakers who paint themselves into corners this tight.- New Times (L.A.)
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Gregory Weinkauf
It's Tommy's job to clean the peep booths surrounding her, and after viewing this one, you'll feel like mopping up, too.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Andy Klein
The acting tends toward the cartoonish (not in a good way), and the story is built on a series of illogical motivations.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Andy Klein
There is nothing particularly interesting about either the people or the situations. Barrial might as well have filmed ANY body.- New Times (L.A.)
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by