Christian Science Monitor's Scores

  • Movies
  • TV
For 4,492 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 55% higher than the average critic
  • 2% same as the average critic
  • 43% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 2.1 points higher than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 67
Highest review score: 100 'Round Midnight
Lowest review score: 0 Couples Retreat
Score distribution:
4492 movie reviews
  1. Tries to be a new "Something Wild"; ends up being tamer than tame.
  2. Funny dialogue, crisp black-and-white cinematography, and a well-chosen cast of mostly stage-trained actors raise this eccentric fantasy a notch above the ordinary.
  3. The first half is high-quality science fiction, the rest is a high-tech chase adventure with a gleeful yen for destructive thrills.
    • 63 Metascore
    • 50 Critic Score
    The impressive presences of Audrey Hepburn and Ben Gazzara help just a little. Otherwise, it's a hollow and very minor affair. [31 Dec 1981, p.23]
    • Christian Science Monitor
  4. This indirect rehash of "To Catch a Thief" trades Hitchcockian shrewdness for the slickest kinds of Hollywood glitz, gloss, and vulgarity.
  5. Adam Sandler is funny as the volatile hero, and the screenplay is just abrasive enough to keep the story surprising.
  6. The action is carefully calculated to captivate a wide audience while allowing hard-core trekkies to savor nuances of plot and personality.
  7. Directed by John Landis with a surprising amount of class, though he lets some of his old ''Animal House'' vulgarity slip ostentatiously into the action.
    • 61 Metascore
    • 50 Critic Score
    Cheadle's innate goodness is the film's main dilemma, since the truth under the story's surface (which we won't reveal here) can be contained for only so long, and with ever-diminishing dramatic returns.
  8. At a time when most movies try far too little, I don't like berating Excalibur for taking on too much. It's just that Mr. Boorman never quite achieves what he attempts. [23 April 1981, p.19]
    • Christian Science Monitor
  9. It’s a rote piece of work that, oddly, also feels dated even at a time when the press and the White House have rarely been more at odds.
  10. Most of the laughs come near the beginning, before Rick Friedberg's klutzy directing becomes annoyingly monotonous.
  11. Its eventual failure to make sense indicates that it's intended more as a surrealistic fable than an ordinary sex-and-violence adventure.
  12. Spacey is almost as swinging as Darin was, but his filmmaking leans toward tried-and-true formulas.
  13. Gooding and De Niro bring their characters to vivid life despite the unsubtle screenplay and hyperactive music score.
  14. The mood is awfully dark for an escapist fantasy, though, and the high-tech mayhem gets repetitious.
  15. Enough odd twists to be mildly interesting.
  16. At a time when much public education is in a state of perilous decay, one wonders whether this sentimental ode to old-school dignity and privilege is in touch with today's pressing realities.
  17. Has good intentions, but its exaggerated celebration of quick-witted improvisation ultimately trivializes the human and historical horrors evoked by the story.
  18. Look for a cameo by a movie star whose initials are J.D.
  19. Intermittently insightful, but a disappointment from the talented Munch.
  20. Darkly elegant cinematography helps compensate for awful dialogue and lackluster acting.
  21. This is one of those movies that profits from very low expectations. If you go in expecting something dreadful, be assured: It's only near dreadful.
  22. It's a creepy and disturbing movie, but there's not a lot going on behind people's eyes. The soullessness lacks soul.
  23. The pacing soon grows dull and the frequent narration is a nonstop string of clichés, platitudes, and truisms that should have been flung out the cutting-room window.
  24. Petroni's directorial debut is too bittersweet and atmospheric for its own good, wrapping a potentially strong story in too many layers of misty emotion.
  25. Roberts brings a sense of personal conviction to her part -- she's quite a feminist herself -- and as much sense of humor as the corny screenplay allows.
  26. What may have started out as a comedy devolves into quasi-Stephen King territory.
  27. Cobb would be a more persuasive picture if the filmmakers had a clearer idea of their intentions.
  28. Park employs all manner of cinematic derring-do – shock cuts, off-kilter compositions, discontinuous storytelling – all to no great purpose other than to make us go “Wow.” A more appropriate response might be, “Huh?”

Top Trailers