Chicago Reader's Scores
- Movies
For 6,312 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
42% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
56% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.9 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | I Stand Alone | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Old Dogs |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,983 out of 6312
-
Mixed: 2,456 out of 6312
-
Negative: 873 out of 6312
6312
movie
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
This 1948 effort is probably the last of their watchable films, though it’s a long way from their best.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
A first-rate police thriller (1948) directed by Jules Dassin when he was still in his prime and before he was blacklisted, shot memorably in New York locations.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
There must be some excuse for this but I can't imagine what it is.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
John Huston was rarely in better form than he was directing this 1948 study of gold fever and worse obsessions among an unlikely trio of prospectors... Bogart is outstanding as the pathetic bully Fred C. Dobbs.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Bob Hope, Bing Crosby, and Dorothy Lamour on an average journey, enlivened by the strange antics of a forgotten vaudeville team called the Wiere Brothers, who do acrobatic stunts and shout “You’re in the groove, Jackson!” on cue.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Films on this subject are generally solemn and naive, but director Michael Powell and writer Emeric Pressburger bring wit and intelligence to it.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The most delicate and nuanced of film noirs, graced with a reflective lyricism that almost lifts it out of the genre.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
An odd, atmospheric 1947 thriller with a San Francisco setting, adapted by writer-director Delmer Daves from a David Goodis novel and starring Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Grant seems stymied in this claustrophobic, essentially misogynistic material, and director Irving Reis isn’t the man to pull him out.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Nick and Nora investigate a jazz-club killing in this final entry (1947) in the series, which gets by—just barely—on the charm of stars William Powell and Myrna Loy.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Jules Dassin wasn't a bad director before he went to Europe and caught a bad case of Art (He Who Must Die), and this 1947 prison picture, done in the gritty late-40s documentary style, is one of his best efforts.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
It's a highly professional piece of Hollywood sentimentalism.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
The graveyard scene is still a shocker, the details are still astonishingly well assembled, and the performances are wonderful.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
This may be Reed’s most pretentious film, but it also happens to be one of his very best, beautifully capturing the poetry of a city at night (with black-and-white cinematography by Robert Krasker that’s within hailing distance of Gregg Toland and Stanley Cortez’s work with Orson Welles).- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Fred Camper
Walsh’s directness gives the film an understated quality that may seem anachronistic today but has real cinematic integrity.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
John Cromwell, an excellent filmmaker in other circumstances (The Fountain, Since You Went Away), doesn’t have the taste for extremes that film noir requires; he softens the emotions and dims the motivations.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
The best American movie about returning soldiers I've ever seen—the most moving and the most deeply felt. It bears witness to its times and contemporaries like few other Hollywood features, and Gregg Toland's deep-focus cinematography is one of the best things he ever did.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The stories are pretty good folk, though a little too coyly calculated. But the plantation stuff is beneath contempt. Better save this for nostalgia only—kids won't be missing anything if they never encounter this relic.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Funny and stirring, in quite unpredictable ways, with the usual Powellian flair for drawing the universal out of the screamingly eccentric.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The virtuoso sequences—the long kiss, the crane shot into the door key—are justly famous, yet the film's real brilliance is in its subtle and detailed portrayal of infinitely perverse relationships.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
A very good movie (1946), and by far the best Raymond Chandler adaptation, but it isn’t one of Howard Hawks’s most refined efforts—it lacks his clarity of line, his balance, his sense of a free spirit at play within a carefully set structure.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Orson Welles's 1946 film reproduces his personal themes of self-scrutiny and self-destruction only in outline, though it is an inventive, highly enjoyable thriller.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
This 1946 film is a key work of the postwar period, dripping with demented romanticism and the venom of disillusionment. Tay Garnett directed, finding the pull of obsession in every tracking shot.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
It's one of the most consistently funny films in the “Road” series, though by this late point (1945) the manic unpredictability of the early films has settled slightly into formula.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Brilliantly intertwined intensely personal stories with magnificently epic narrative.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
The gaudy Freudianism of this 1945 Hitchcock film, backed by a dream sequence designed by Salvador Dalí and an overexcited score by Miklós Rósza, can make it hard to take, but beneath the facile trappings there is an intriguing Hitchcockian study of role reversal, with doctors and patients, men and women, mothers and sons inverting their assigned relationships with compelling, subversive results.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review