Chicago Reader's Scores
- Movies
For 6,312 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
42% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
56% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.9 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | I Stand Alone | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Old Dogs |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,983 out of 6312
-
Mixed: 2,456 out of 6312
-
Negative: 873 out of 6312
6312
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
I was beguiled by both the eerie moods and the striking compositions, which incorporate large stretches of empty space.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The big green babysitter is back, but the charm has evaporated.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Burt Reynolds showed signs of becoming a very personal filmmaker with this police thriller, his third outing as a director. It has the wistful faith in innocence and the extreme moral outrage of Gator coupled with the subversive infantilism of The End; what Reynolds lacks in technique (which is plenty) is nearly compensated for by the almost embarrassing intensity of his feelings. The context is extremely violent, which makes the intimate moments—between Reynolds and the girl and Reynolds and his buddies—stand out in agonizingly stark relief.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
As effective as MacDowell was in sex, lies, and videotape, she's clearly no match for the talented Depardieu; perhaps she'd seem less out of her depth if the script wasn't so implausible and threadbare.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
But where Dante's cynicism ultimately carried the day over Spielberg's piousness in Gremlins, Explorers remains a hopelessly schizophrenic film, obscenely eager to compromise its own originality.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
A murky, directionless plot sinks this big-budget fantasy despite Martin Laing's elaborate production design; the dark, industrial-looking sets often recall "Brazil" but without that film's thrilling sense of an imagination run amok.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lisa Alspector
The new sexism -- the old sexism plus the idea that everything is ironic -- is getting old.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
McKee's direction of actors is as clumsy as the stabs at rapid editing.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
All I got was this lousy movie. OK, it's not that bad, though in contrast to "Ocean's Eleven," which gave its megastars a neat little heist story, this sequel is both contrived and convoluted.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
There is hardly any point in discussing the direction of a picture like this, in which almost every shot has been predetermined by the requirements of the special effects, yet director Richard Marquand fluffs the two or three real opportunities he has, rendering the long-delayed character climaxes with a chilly indifference.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The end result is more like a supermarket on Saturday afternoon. The content is engaging, though.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The episodic structure works to the movie's benefit, highlighting the eccentric supporting characters and allowing Mendes to smoothly downshift from hilarity to sadness.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Cliff Doerksen
This is the art-house equivalent of a Clive Barker splatterfest, punctuated by mildly amusing stabs at Lynchian absurdity and compromised by an incoherent plot twist that would leave M. Night Shyamalan rolling his eyes.- Chicago Reader
- Posted Dec 11, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
There isn't a whole lot of Zen here, barring the opening and closing scenes with a priest, but there's plenty of lively sex, both conventional and otherwise, in this high-spirited porn romp from Hong Kong.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
First-time director James Gartner observes all the rituals--the coach busting chops, the team sneaking out to party--but the players are indifferently characterized and the civil rights story has a fake Black History Month feel.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Better than it might have been, given the limitations of this kind of brand-name filmmaking. Hodges doesn't shirk his duties, and though the film lapses too often into easy facetiousness, much of it feels surprisingly substantial. The action moves smoothly and logically, finding a rhythm that engages your attention despite the patent lack of inspiration and genuine commitment.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The movie is quite enjoyable, though, redeemed by Crowe's trademark sincerity and assured handling of oddball character actors.- Chicago Reader
- Posted Dec 22, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
No sense of complicity between filmmaker and spectator, no depth, no ambiguity, no production value spared, plenty of running time and pomposity, and a desperate sense of trying to do everything and please everybody.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Though we are largely spared Leonard Nimoy's stentorian presence as a performer, we must endure his miscalculations as a director: the dialogue scenes are often hilariously turgid; the action scenes—when Nimoy can be bothered to descend from his podium and film them—are zanily maladroit.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Alternately mawkish and strident, with lots of fades to white and dog reaction shots, this can be recommended only for its good intentions.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The romantic plot, involving his unrequited loved for Garner, is soured by her character's unconcealed shallowness: she won't have him because his genes aren't up to snuff.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
One more sluggish, artfully framed thriller with Rembrandt lighting set in a New York borough--a kind of picture that's awfully hard to do in a fresh manner.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
The story's resolution isn't very satisfying, but I considered most of this movie time well spent.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
At first I thought this was a Michael Haneke knockoff, but it's more depressing and less edifying than most of those narrative experiments, which is why I eventually tuned it out.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
"Bill & Ted's Aurora Adventures" might almost serve as the subtitle for this very silly but enjoyable 1992 comedy, developed from characters introduced on Saturday Night Live--heavy-metal fans (Mike Myers and Dana Carvey) with a cable access show in Aurora, Illinois.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The movie implies that Durst murdered his wife, but the unsolved crime turns out to be less mysterious than the mind of the killer, nervily portrayed by Gosling as not evil but unaccountably empty.- Chicago Reader
- Posted Dec 30, 2010
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
This is one of those movies whose empty-headed premise is so pure it's witty: with his insatiable need for excitement, the hero is a perfect stand-in for the fanboys in the audience.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Critic Score
Newman does a remarkable John Huston impression, and screenwriter John Milius demonstrates once again that he went to film school.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review