Chicago Reader's Scores
- Movies
For 6,312 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
42% higher than the average critic
-
2% same as the average critic
-
56% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 5 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Movie review score: 60
| Highest review score: | I Stand Alone | |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest review score: | Old Dogs |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,983 out of 6312
-
Mixed: 2,456 out of 6312
-
Negative: 873 out of 6312
6312
movie
reviews
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
An overloaded script by Heidi Thomas... defeats a fine cast- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The details of Saint-Laurent's creative process are fairly scant compared to the endless display of material possessions; when the movie is over, it seems more like a catalog than a life story.- Chicago Reader
- Posted Jun 2, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
This loses focus and begins to get a little soggy and moralistic toward the end, but on the whole it's a sensitive and well-observed comedy that's especially adept at handling the characters' rage.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Watchable if far-fetched movie is seriously marred by its three leads; only Garrel manages to suggest a person rather than a fashion model dutifully following instructions.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Despite a few flashes of talent in the 40s, Edward Dmytryk had descended to hack status by the time he filmed this 1954 version of Herman Wouk's novel, and his ham-fisted direction does little to alleviate the obviousness of the drama and the thinness of the characterizations.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Andrea Gronvall
A crime wave gives the heroine a mystery to solve and provides most of the comedy, but the film is stronger in its dramatic stretches.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
This 1939 release is still watchable, though the spirit is now sitcom.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
There is enough stylish sex and amusing character work (the supporting cast includes Ed Lauter, Mickey Rourke, Joe Pesci, and Helen Kallianiotis) to carry the day.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
The comedy is extremely broad (with Curtis eliciting almost as many laughs as Schwarzenegger), the action sequences are as well crafted as one can expect from Cameron, and the meaning is as root basic as anyone would wish.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Nevertheless, the cast of mainly unknowns is so good, and Linklater is so adept at playing them off one another, that the two-hour running time never seems overextended.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
- Chicago Reader
- Posted Dec 15, 2010
- Read full review
-
- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
After the portentous "No Country for Old Men," Joel and Ethan Coen return to their trademark brand of cruel, misanthropic farce, and for dark laughs and hurtling narrative momentum this spy caper is their best work since "Fargo."- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The genre shows serious signs of wear in this needlessly fictionalized feature about Vince Papale.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Lisa Alspector
Fast-paced editing doesn't compensate for unconvincing dialogue.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Hank Sartin
This is both melodramatic and overly tidy in its plotting, but its odd personal relationships are utterly believable.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
What Scorsese brings to the table, having created more than his share of rascally villains, is a renewed sense of horror and despair at the power of evil.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Cliff Doerksen
This 2009 feature is as precious as it sounds but also irresistibly charming. If you’re a newcomer to the oeuvre of New Wave hero Jacques Rivette, this is a highly accessible port of entry.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The cruel imperialism of the war is just the sort of thing that stokes Sayles's liberal ire, which is one reason the movie so often recalls his proletarian masterpiece Matewan (1987).- Chicago Reader
- Posted Sep 17, 2011
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
Dismal Stanley Kramer morality play about a middle-class couple facing the prospect of their daughter's marriage to a black man (Sidney Poitier). A disaster on all counts.- Chicago Reader
- Posted Jun 29, 2017
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
This isn't as snappily directed or as caustically conceived as the subsequent Risky Business, which has a similar theme, but it's arguably just as sexy and almost as funny.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
An inept cheapo by any standard, only marginally more sophisticated than an Edward Wood Jr. production—yet it carries a certain demented charm, and there’s reason to suspect that Tobe Hooper checked it out before making The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
Siegel manages to keep the action wound pretty tight, though he doesn’t seem to sympathize much with Rose’s bleeding-heart liberalism.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Starting off as a low-key psychological drama, this suddenly turns into a murder mystery that's resolved awkwardly and ambiguously, but the fascination of the characters and milieu remains.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
J.R. Jones
The movie's first half hour is a barrage of lazy narrative pointers--endless expository voice-over, freeze frames and captions to identify the numerous characters--and by the time screenwriter Tina Gordon Chism decides to write an extended scene, the story is already dead in the water.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Pat Graham
Another early youth ensemble pic from St. Elmo's Fire director Joel Schumacher, with an aspiring-to-hipness cast.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Cliff Doerksen
Mildly diverting rather than uproarious, the film still stands out among teen sex comedies for its low-key approach to antic material. The best bits are supplied by Justin Long as Doubleday's stoner brother and Adhir Kalyan as the hero's plummy-accented coconspirator.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Dave Kehr
This 1950 Hitchcock film came between Under Capricorn and Strangers on a Train, and if it isn’t the equal of those two sterling achievements, it’s still an intriguing experiment.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by
-
-
Reviewed by
Jonathan Rosenbaum
Despite a good deal of witty, bantering dialogue and clever plotting, some interesting moral ambiguity about the relative corruption of a cop (Russell) and a drug dealer (Gibson), and a likable performance by Raul Julia, this film seems overinfected by the kind of southern California narcissism that makes all of the male characters a little too pleased with themselves, with Pfeiffer little more than a beanbag in the little-boy macho games.- Chicago Reader
- Read full review
-
Reviewed by