Metascore
54

Mixed or average reviews - based on 29 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 9 out of 29
  2. Negative: 4 out of 29
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. May 11, 2015
    30
    The band begins to slog through the session--each song sounds like the sonic embodiment of utter indifference, only this time it’s accompanied by electric instruments.
  2. May 6, 2015
    30
    Following a rigid set of programming, they’ve stripped away the artifice from their ostensible Americana aesthetic to reveal the boilerplate alt-rock that forms its core circuitry.
  3. May 7, 2015
    20
    They are 12 variations on vaguely Don Henley-inspired arena schlock, and in this transition, they've found a new bottom.
  4. 16
    Wilder Mind, airless to the extreme, plods on, song after saccharine song. Melodies do abound. But they’re wearying, like the mundane hell of children’s tunes, blasted on repeat, throughout a long car trip.
User Score
5.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 189 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 88 out of 189
  2. Negative: 73 out of 189
  1. May 4, 2015
    10
    Amazing and brave new sound without losing their emotional touch. The first line of the album felt like a hand squeezing my heart and itAmazing and brave new sound without losing their emotional touch. The first line of the album felt like a hand squeezing my heart and it didn't let go until the last song.
    The statement is clear: Mumford and Sons are not banjos and kickdrums, they're real musicians.
    Full Review »
  2. May 5, 2015
    1
    It was certainly a brave move for Mumford & Sons to change their style from more of a folk rock genre towards an alternative/indie style.It was certainly a brave move for Mumford & Sons to change their style from more of a folk rock genre towards an alternative/indie style. However, after one listen of 'Wilder Minds', it shows they certainly are a long way from effectively pulling this off. The band have opted for a style of indie that is being constantly overused in modern music. An overproduced, dull and somewhat dated sound, that is almost safe and chart-friendly. It must be disappointing for the true Mumford & Sons fans; ditching a somewhat distinctive sound of banjos, kickdrums and folk rock, for the safer option.

    In terms of the actual album, it's clear Mumford & Sons are decent musicians. We've seen this from their previous 2 albums, 'Sigh No More' and 'Babel'. However this time around, lyrically, Marcus Mumford's voice seems to become more irritating as the album progresses. The vast majority of these songs lack any direction at all and have very little impact on the listener. I understand that bands can't follow the same path for their whole career; we've seen bands change their style and image over the years, such as The Cure and Arctic Monkeys, amongst others. But for me, Mumford & Sons have followed a similar path of Coldplay, and effectively sold-out with this album. They had a distinctive and unique sound that is now long gone.

    The fact people are giving this album 10 out of 10 and saying it has 'silenced the critics' is ludicrous. A disappointing album to say the least.
    Full Review »
  3. May 4, 2015
    0
    Don't know why anyone would say the critics are silenced. just look at the reviews on this site, with many more to come. First of all, theDon't know why anyone would say the critics are silenced. just look at the reviews on this site, with many more to come. First of all, the album and the many interviews given in advance of its release demonstrate that M$S were only tourists in the world of folk. They have forsworn the banjo, the clothes and even the name of the band. Don't know where that leaves their legion of loyal fans. Many of them are feeling hoodwinked. This is such a safe and pallid exercise in indie rock. It shows them to be a band with very limited musical imagination. They are gentlemen of the middle of the road. There is change of style and of costume, but most of all what this is is a just a change in algorithm. Full Review »