- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Their most colorful, diverse and consistent record yet.
-
Q MagazineBracing stuff. [Oct 2006, p.127]
-
Despite some missteps... this comes close to fulfilling the promise of Audioslave's pedigree.
-
BlenderIn place of the band's distinctive head-banging limberness, there's a strange hybrid: a new sort of hard-rock soul, slightly lumbering in spite of its virtuosity. [Sep 2006, p.136]
-
Rolling StoneMost of these twelve tracks are impressive structures with periodic highs... that never resolve into songs. [7 Sep 2006, p.105]
-
Revelations is one step closer to their mutation into a more unified rock outfit.
-
For the first time Audioslave sound more like a cohesive unit than a product of two groups spliced together.
-
If you liked the formula then, you’ll like Revelations now.
-
The actual music merely offers more of the same oddly faceless brand of heavy rock the group has been cranking out since its 2002 debut.
-
Once again, the results feel too spotty.
-
Despite Mr. Cornell’s budding outrage, and the band’s attempts to funk up its sound, “Revelations” has a tentative, unfinished air.
-
SpinVariety has never been Audioslave's strong suit. [Sep 2006, p.102]
-
MojoIts rote alternarock thrills are meagre vittles compared to the revolutionary metal the principle players have wrought in the past. [Oct 2006, p.110]
-
UncutToo one-speed to attain the subtlety of Zep, too constipated to really funk out. [Oct 2006, p.99]
-
New Musical Express (NME)Excruciating fret wankery... appalling metal funk... and Chris Cornell 'singing' like a castrated gibbon throughout. [2 Sep 2006, p.21]
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 60 out of 75
-
Mixed: 9 out of 75
-
Negative: 6 out of 75
-
Feb 21, 2016
-
Oct 25, 2010
-
KyleMay 2, 2007I don't know what it is but the Audioslave formula seems to work for me.