And Those Who Were Seen Dancing
by Tess Parks
Metascore
72

Generally favorable reviews - based on 6 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 6
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 6
  3. Negative: 0 out of 6
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Paste Magazine
    May 24, 2022
    84
    And Those Who Were Seen Dancing certainly isn’t the first album to put a fresh spin on the psych aesthetic, but by shrugging off its constraints, Parks has left her own definitive mark on it.
  2. Exclaim
    May 20, 2022
    80
    With heavy doses of Mellotron, downtempo breakbeats, electric piano, fuzzy guitars, family and fortitude, And Those Who Were Seen Dancing demands to be heard and felt.
  3. Uncut
    May 20, 2022
    80
    An album that feels charged by forward momentum while also embracing the comforting pulse of a locked groove. [Jul 2022, p.31]
    All this publication's reviews
  5. Under The Radar
    Jun 8, 2022
    75
    Her cool, laconic drawl works best when paired with coruscating guitars and it’s at those moments that the album really shines. Hopefully, it won’t be a decade until she releases another solo album, as she’s undoubtedly a gifted artist with much to offer.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
tbd

No user score yet- Awaiting 3 more ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 1
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 1
  3. Negative: 0 out of 1
  1. StevenX
    Apr 10, 2023
    7
    This album started out as if it wanted to put me to sleep, or give me heroin. Tess Parks averages 3 notes per song for the first twoThis album started out as if it wanted to put me to sleep, or give me heroin. Tess Parks averages 3 notes per song for the first two vaguely-conscious bluesy swirlers, and the sequence of those notes is so similar that you can lift the vocals from one song, put it in the other, and not really notice the difference. Her previous LP, "I Declare Nothing" with one Anton Newcombe on everything but said vocals, was full of this stuff, chord after chord played to death already elsewhere, vocals phoned in from the back of the opium den. Near the end of the third song here, though, actual backing vocals slide in, and I'll be damned if Parks doesn't wake up a little bit. By "Do You Pray?" a few songs later, the band is rocking and she's, while not a passion pit, a lot more awake. The arrangements become much more varied, even when Parks slides back into Lana-del-Rey-on-'Ludes mode here and there (yeah, I know, redundant). It's a hard fight at times - she goes back to square one vocally on "I See Angels", but the song is saved by a throbbing background that propels it farther than she would normally have taken it. By the time the set winds up with the beautiful, plaintive flow and ebb that is "Saint Michael", I'm damned if she hasn't won this round. Even when the band is locked into Brian Jonestown Massacre-like figures and drowning in reverb, this doesn't sound retro. The smoky world of Tess Parks is finally letting us further in, and we are better listeners for it. That such a relatively quiet album still manages to be leaps and bounds over her last quiet album is a big deal indeed. If she can keep this up she'll be her own genre, and anyone who wrote her off after the last album (me included) should be ashamed.… Full Review »