V for Vendetta

9

lukechristianscJul 13, 2015

Director James McTeigue's action set pieces have satisfying crime fighting scenes it's not mindblowing or "look at that! That was cool " moments , however the Wachowski brothers screenplay engages mystery and suspense the story is intrigued,Director James McTeigue's action set pieces have satisfying crime fighting scenes it's not mindblowing or "look at that! That was cool " moments , however the Wachowski brothers screenplay engages mystery and suspense the story is intrigued, interesting in the British thesps and it's effective political message. So it's like world war three but in London, so London is a police state controlled by a authoritarian government, a vigilante know as V (Hugo Weaving) using terrorist tactics to fight the oppressors of the world which he's living on. V saves a woman Evey Hammond (Natalie Portman) from the secret police he discovers an ally in his fight against England's oppressors and has a relationship with Evey. It's sounds like Weaving is trying to an impression of batman for some odd reason, he is once again fantastic in a Wachowski brothers movie but once you get to know his character it's impressive we can feel for his character. Portman was exceptional as V's sidekick/girlfriend. Okay look this movie has a effective political message but it there's nothing about the action that is all that great. But some people might take the film offensive. Grade A… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

BananaReviewsJun 23, 2016

amazing film with a very important message for the people, is open our eyes and see what's in the media and government, very good movie and recommended to all.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

arostislavnaDec 13, 2021

Iconic, and incredibly important film. This is sprinkled with non-fiction throughout the story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

shiftworkerAug 22, 2016

Natalie Portman plays feisty young lady under a fascist regime led by John Hurt. If you have any sympathy with radicals or revolutionaries, you'll probably enjoy this dystopian tale though there are some almost-camp moments. It won't appealNatalie Portman plays feisty young lady under a fascist regime led by John Hurt. If you have any sympathy with radicals or revolutionaries, you'll probably enjoy this dystopian tale though there are some almost-camp moments. It won't appeal to conservatives or the conventional.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

KraistlinDec 19, 2019

Essential. Vertigo label never disappoints. Everyone should see this film at least once in the life.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

mapzNov 9, 2020

The politicians should fear of their 'subjects' - and not the other way around. Next step: Agorism?

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Scorpionz980Nov 6, 2019

The movie is beautiful, I really like the graphics, and the special effects that are behind it, beautiful interpretation on character V

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AWESOM-0Jun 3, 2020

I’m a huge fan of Alan Moore and although this is very well done, it loses the essence of what made the comic so good. I did have some have some issues with the last 20-30 mins (funnily, its what is most changed from the comic) but I loved itI’m a huge fan of Alan Moore and although this is very well done, it loses the essence of what made the comic so good. I did have some have some issues with the last 20-30 mins (funnily, its what is most changed from the comic) but I loved it up to there.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

RevengeX57Dec 9, 2020

I gave 9 because movie kind of boring but the subject makes lots of sense. Great movie!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

GiugiOct 2, 2022

Very good movie with a great storyline, great direction and really really good acting. In general the film is entertaining and keeps a good pace for most of its duration, too bad for some parts that are a bit slow but pass well looking inVery good movie with a great storyline, great direction and really really good acting. In general the film is entertaining and keeps a good pace for most of its duration, too bad for some parts that are a bit slow but pass well looking in general at the whole complex.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

RyanF.Mar 20, 2006

This has to be one of the best movies I"ve seen this year [so far]. It's great when an action movie, well, doesn't use action to move the story. Hugo Weaving once again amazes me at his ability to act any part, and he made V a very This has to be one of the best movies I"ve seen this year [so far]. It's great when an action movie, well, doesn't use action to move the story. Hugo Weaving once again amazes me at his ability to act any part, and he made V a very likeable character. Natalie Portman was pretty good, I guess. But as I mentioned earlier about an action movie that doesn't use action to move the plot, V for Vendetta ending action was executed perfectly. It also showed that V isn't perfect. I always love when a movie gives me the shivers. And that makes a great movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

RobWheelerSep 3, 2009

Blimey, there's some scathing comments there. I really enjoyed this film, maybe more so because I treated it as a work of fiction and didn't draw comparisons between it and the real world. A good storyline, decent enough acting,Blimey, there's some scathing comments there. I really enjoyed this film, maybe more so because I treated it as a work of fiction and didn't draw comparisons between it and the real world. A good storyline, decent enough acting, some fine visuals and some good plot twists made good viewing.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

JudeP.Mar 20, 2006

I found it interesting and and although I am a lefty, I didn't actually agree with all the politics side. I felt the ideas were made with rather broad strokes. However policital fiction has always taken the situation to the extreme as a I found it interesting and and although I am a lefty, I didn't actually agree with all the politics side. I felt the ideas were made with rather broad strokes. However policital fiction has always taken the situation to the extreme as a method of analysing them - Animal Farm, 1984,Gulliver's travels, Swift's modest proposal for dealing with the Irish famine. I think maybe this should be a double billing with Ghandi just to balance things out a bit. Anyone who feels that TV had to much of a prevelance should watch/read Noam Chomsky's manufacturing consent, before deciding how much our lives are dictated by the media. It was billed too much as a thriller and I hate the fact they showed Big Ben blowing up in the trailer talk about giving the ending away!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AnonymousMCAug 6, 2006

An intriguing political thriller, with a touch of Matrix gloss. I miss the Matrix trilogy's action, but this movie has a greater focus on its moral and societal ideals, a focus so great that the whole movie just encapsulates you. MakesAn intriguing political thriller, with a touch of Matrix gloss. I miss the Matrix trilogy's action, but this movie has a greater focus on its moral and societal ideals, a focus so great that the whole movie just encapsulates you. Makes you think we REALLY need a hero like V, with a revolt to match.

A few problems, though:
1) V using torture to covert Portman? Feels a bit morally incoherent and pro-totalitarian, contradictory to the movie's goal. Offended me a little.
2) Action a bit light in supply, probably due to a constrained $50 million dollar budget, where as the Matrix reloaded had $127 million at its disposal. They do the best with what they have, though. And it's unlikely that rich studio execs would heap $120+ million on a film that preaches politics that threaten to cut their wealth, anyway.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PepeS.Mar 13, 2006

Future situation, with a very good plot. Good performance by Natalie Portman. Hate 'Matrix' scenes in the movie...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

HollycMar 18, 2006

The look of the film is excellent---visually they did a pretty magnificent job. The intentional verbosity works really well in many scenes--but sometimes faulters. The story, though I haven't read the original Alan Moore graphic novel, The look of the film is excellent---visually they did a pretty magnificent job. The intentional verbosity works really well in many scenes--but sometimes faulters. The story, though I haven't read the original Alan Moore graphic novel, is ballsy to say the least (given the time of release) And Hugo and Natalie were fantastic. But I wouldn't judge this as some sort of call to arms in reality. The point being, all gov'ts can lead to fascism--and complacency among the populace is usually at the root. They also make some pretty good points about "terrorism" or rebellion---(namely when/where it's born and how similar it is to its creator) as well as media control-- none of it happens in a vacuum---or by coincidence. The action in the film is intermitten by some pretty long character scenes--but the FX fits well & by no means is as gratuitous as the #2 & #3 matrix films. It's definitely a film to be enjoyed in the theater (matinee prices anyway).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

SamiW.Mar 20, 2006

I went to this movie, looking for entertainment and found it. Not just some sleazy chick flick that has a pre-written format for content but something that made me think deeply about government and people. The dialogue was amusing, and I I went to this movie, looking for entertainment and found it. Not just some sleazy chick flick that has a pre-written format for content but something that made me think deeply about government and people. The dialogue was amusing, and I absolutely loved Portman. The backround information was sketchy at best and the reason for blowing up parliament vague and more left to the imagination than anything. The movie has faults but I believe that there are movies that have a less entertainment value given good reviews than a movie that requires you think and believe in something more being harped upon because of politics. When I want to watch a movie, I check my politics at the door.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

MitchellF.Mar 27, 2006

I could go on with a lengthy speach about this movie, but after reading other peoples reviews, I feel that i cant do this movie justice without someone else contradicting my opinion about how this movie portrayed "politics". Its a freaking I could go on with a lengthy speach about this movie, but after reading other peoples reviews, I feel that i cant do this movie justice without someone else contradicting my opinion about how this movie portrayed "politics". Its a freaking movie, for god sakes who cares how the politics are handled in the future of a COMIC BOOK! Just go see the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JonathanC.Sep 16, 2006

It was better to me than the Matrix. It was very political but it was played very well. I think the letter scene could have been done better.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DavidH.Feb 10, 2007

V was a very good film, anyone giving it less than a 7, not only came in midway through the film, but is over critical of the great performances given by Portman and Weaving.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

CarlW.May 21, 2007

This movie IS thought provoking. Many critics caught up in the rush to elitism brand this as oversimplistic, shallow, and irresponsible. I am delighted to have an alternative to "The Hills Have Eyes 5" and "Saw 12" Evidently some critics This movie IS thought provoking. Many critics caught up in the rush to elitism brand this as oversimplistic, shallow, and irresponsible. I am delighted to have an alternative to "The Hills Have Eyes 5" and "Saw 12" Evidently some critics wouldn't know shallow, and irresponsible if it bit them on the ass.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DrunkenMasterMar 14, 2006

Please note the bad reviews are all based on poltical idealogy..are you really suprised? The critic for the New Yorker is an idiot and a tool...go ahead and listen to him if your idea of a good time is what passes for culture in the bowels Please note the bad reviews are all based on poltical idealogy..are you really suprised? The critic for the New Yorker is an idiot and a tool...go ahead and listen to him if your idea of a good time is what passes for culture in the bowels of the rag he writes for. Totally ridiculous.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

VerbalK.Mar 19, 2006

Best eyecandy film I've seen this year so far. Please note that none of the READER REVIEWS up to this point mention the GRAPHIC by Lloyd and an Un-credited by choice Moore. One word for the others. Bollocks. Hellblazer had a decent Best eyecandy film I've seen this year so far. Please note that none of the READER REVIEWS up to this point mention the GRAPHIC by Lloyd and an Un-credited by choice Moore. One word for the others. Bollocks. Hellblazer had a decent movie spin and V also gets its just due. It really is a credit to Alan Moore that his themes and characterization still stand to make relevant theatrical releases some 20 years after its publication as comic media. The filmakers of V deserve credit for translating the same feel to motion picture. It is unfortunate that the original author has distanced himself from this release. Rodriguez's Sin City was to Frank Miller what Vendetta appears to be for Alan Moore. Mr Moore please embrace the mainstream exposure before WATCHMEN becomes the DaVINCI CODE, when it should be HOLY BLOOD HOLY GRAIL of comic films. After WATCHMEN comics were about as interesting as EPISODES I, II, and III after the original trilogy. And I read WATCHMEN when I was 13. Who else but luke and leia's moms could be this santized version of e-V-ey? Rhea excellent as always playing the out-of-the-loop englishman. My only quips are the jolly ending and the 'abduction' of evey sequence that I didn't particularly care for in the maxi-series either. Only Sean Bean as V could have made for a better film, but there is always NiteOwl II.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PaulO.Mar 19, 2006

As a fan of Alan Moore and the original mini-series comic book, I'm surprised this movie captured the heart of the source material. We're getting mixed reviews because this is an action movie with subversive themes--that As a fan of Alan Moore and the original mini-series comic book, I'm surprised this movie captured the heart of the source material. We're getting mixed reviews because this is an action movie with subversive themes--that aren't quite black or white, for that matter. If you watch this simply AS an action picture alone, you'll be bored by all the debate and back story. If you watch this merely AS a political film, it's too flat and muddled (V is not clearly the hero or the villain--he's both and he's neither). So instead, watch the movie itself as what it is. As such, it's exciting, interesting, at times even moving. Leave your genre expectations at the door to assist in seeing this for what it's worth.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

MikeH.Mar 19, 2006

An entertaining, engaging movie that only dragged a couple of times. "V" is far more enjoyable than almost all of the comic book/graphic novel adaptations that have been released in the past five years. See this on the big screen while you An entertaining, engaging movie that only dragged a couple of times. "V" is far more enjoyable than almost all of the comic book/graphic novel adaptations that have been released in the past five years. See this on the big screen while you can - it's well worth the time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

StefanS.Mar 20, 2006

V for Vendetta is a great look into one of the many possiable futures we face. More then anything V offers an entertaining look at what is possiable when one person decides to take a stand against a seemingly unbeatable opressor. V looks V for Vendetta is a great look into one of the many possiable futures we face. More then anything V offers an entertaining look at what is possiable when one person decides to take a stand against a seemingly unbeatable opressor. V looks deeply into how freedom is can be taken away slowly and leaves the characters wondering when things really changed. I enjoyed the film and suggest it not just because it is a currently relevent film but because of its entertainment value.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TonydannieMar 21, 2006

This was an entertaning film. The visual style was unique. And it really opens your eyes to what is going on in the world right now. Fear is power. All that noise. I have to say while pepole are going goo- ga ga for Natalie Portman and her This was an entertaning film. The visual style was unique. And it really opens your eyes to what is going on in the world right now. Fear is power. All that noise. I have to say while pepole are going goo- ga ga for Natalie Portman and her shaved head. I have to send out props to Hugo Weaving who even though you cant see him while wearing that mask he still manages to capture you and draw you into the story. The acting from this particular actor was nothing more then excellence. If you go to see this movie . go see it for Hugo 's acting alone. Good fun. Couple of minor flaws. but i can deal with them.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ElliotN>Mar 27, 2006

I thought this was a great movie overall. I have read the Graphic Novel recently and found that some minor details were changed, but very few of them put me off. The graphic novel is a little bit anticlimatic, but the movie is not.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JeffL.Apr 3, 2006

Crazily ambitious, overstuffed, yet utterly compelling mixture of comic book action, dystopian sci-fi, and left-wing agitprop set in a near-future when Britain is once again the world's preeminent superpower after the United Crazily ambitious, overstuffed, yet utterly compelling mixture of comic book action, dystopian sci-fi, and left-wing agitprop set in a near-future when Britain is once again the world's preeminent superpower after the United States' failed foreign policies and a disastrous war in the Middle East (where do they get this stuff???) have left it in a state of civil war. This future Britain is run with an iron fist by a dictator (John Hurt) who uses religious bigotry, homophobia, and fear of terrorism to hold sway over the populace, except for a mysterious masked avenger known only as V (Hugo Weaving), who sets out on a violent campaign against the powers that be, including a plot to blow up Parliament. Natalie Portman (shaved head, Brit accent, and all) is excellent as Evey, reporter for a right-wing TV network, who is saved by V then drafted into his plans. The script by the Wachowski Brothers (The Matrix), based on a graphic novel by Alan Moore (From Hell), has many influences; 1984, of course, but also Alphaville, Fahrenheit 451, Phantom of the Opera, Batman, and The Count of Monte Cristo (the Robert Donat version is V's favorite film) among others. What's particularly ballsy here is how this especially nasty future is simply a logical extension of all the worst elements of today's real-life political climate (from Fox News to bird flu paranoia), and how the hero of a big-budget post-9/11 mass entertainment is essentially a sympathetic terrorist. The vivid art direction, heavily influenced by Nazi and Communist iconography, is Oscar-worthy, and the supporting cast is aces, including Stephen Rea as a detective, Stephen Fry as a quietly rebellious gay man, and Roger Allam as a venom-spewing TV host so vile and reactionary he makes Rush, Hannity, and "Falafel Guy" O'Reilly seem measured and reasonable by comparison. The film is overlong and over-the-top in both good and bad ways, but it's kind of hard to complain too loudly about a movie that has too MANY ideas at a time when most wannabe thrillers (Firewall, anyone?) have none whatsoever.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

NooraB.May 25, 2006

Visually beautiful, with excellent actors and interesting plot. What I don't like is the fact that so many critics are looking at the story as criticism on today's society when it should be viewed in the 80's context as a Visually beautiful, with excellent actors and interesting plot. What I don't like is the fact that so many critics are looking at the story as criticism on today's society when it should be viewed in the 80's context as a statement on the inhumanity of the Thatcherist politics.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TimothyP.Aug 1, 2006

Wonderful movie, makes you think!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DanC.Aug 8, 2006

Excellent as entertainment and spectacle. The political message is not a clear or particularly compelling one, given that the story requires Total Evil from one side. Still, an involving and in many ways eerily moving film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AmurabiM.Sep 4, 2006

This is first rate entertaiment. The kind of pop art that entertains, made us think and amuses us for its collection of ideas and unlimited imagery. James McTeigue´s first effort (of "The Matrix" gang) is just a big exercise of This is first rate entertaiment. The kind of pop art that entertains, made us think and amuses us for its collection of ideas and unlimited imagery. James McTeigue´s first effort (of "The Matrix" gang) is just a big exercise of uncompromising fillmmaking. Its great to watch a film that masked in the label of action entertainment displays a powerful message of freedom. After see "V for Vendetta", everyone thinks about the responsability in the process of actual living: are we members of the mass? libertarians? opressors? what part we play? This is the kind of ideas that this unique film develops. With its message hidden in the form of standard thriller (with a bunch of symbolisms and philosophical reflections), "V for Vendetta" gives us, too, great pleasure to be distracted. This is not escapism, or, better, is the collection of anarchisms wrapped up in the way of escapism. "V for Vendetta" has a clear sense of Orwell and a thought about totalitarian regimes, but the great failure in the film is the waste of time to represent this ideas and make them "swallowable" to teenage audiences that watch the film as an action flick, so the whole intention of being incendiary is just forgotten by the masses that in the film are portrayed. But, what if only one person goes out of the cinema making an exercise of personal reflection about its own freedom? That doesn´t mean that someone could walk out of the Cineplex to make a bomb and blow up the Oval Office, but, just (and I think that is the only purpose of the movie) think about the part we play in this society. For a film that looks inicuous and not too big, that powerful message is a thing to get honored.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ReidF.Jan 27, 2007

Although based on a graphic novel, this is anything but a vapid action film. In fact, there is a stretch in the middle that deliberately moves quite slowly, but instead of being bored, I was drawn to its beauty and elegance. Combining Although based on a graphic novel, this is anything but a vapid action film. In fact, there is a stretch in the middle that deliberately moves quite slowly, but instead of being bored, I was drawn to its beauty and elegance. Combining politics, action, and intrigue, this is a new breed of film, and I hope they make more like it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

RobinJ.Apr 21, 2007

I enjoyed the film. Portmans performance is great but Hugo Weaving speaks to dramatically. It was as if V was trying to make himself sound dangerous and intelligent. Evey didn't seem to play an important part in the film but just stay I enjoyed the film. Portmans performance is great but Hugo Weaving speaks to dramatically. It was as if V was trying to make himself sound dangerous and intelligent. Evey didn't seem to play an important part in the film but just stay around V and blow up the parliment for him. Nontheless the idea that V stresses speaks for itself.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

KerryL.Mar 8, 2009

After reading the posts on the site, I felt inclined to put in my two cents. V was a fine movie, but as with any movie, it had flaws. The biggest flaw was Natalie Portman. She was poorly cast; the role seemed too big for her. The rest of the After reading the posts on the site, I felt inclined to put in my two cents. V was a fine movie, but as with any movie, it had flaws. The biggest flaw was Natalie Portman. She was poorly cast; the role seemed too big for her. The rest of the actors did an amazing job, especially Hugo Weaving even though you never see his face. The British actors did an excellent job, as they almost always do. The film has a fine plot, but it took entirely too much depth out of the novel. The film could have been about half an hour longer and been much better. What is very interesting about the story is that despite being written more than twenty years ago, it remains relevant today. Although not as good as it could have been, it is definitely worth watching. A mature audience which is not letting its political biases cloud its judgments will enjoy the film for what it is: a good action film, with a quality story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

GaryM.Mar 16, 2006

Not faithful to the graphic novel. i understand why Alan Moore might be upset. However, not a bad movie either. It's not stupendous, but for a commercial movie it shows a lot of guts (no pun intended). Very brave movie. I suggest people Not faithful to the graphic novel. i understand why Alan Moore might be upset. However, not a bad movie either. It's not stupendous, but for a commercial movie it shows a lot of guts (no pun intended). Very brave movie. I suggest people to see the movie first the read the comic afterwards or you may discriminate the former. Hugo Weaving shines as "V" even though you never see his face. He is the most faithful one to his chacter and not even Mr. Moore can dismiss that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

HanselH.Mar 17, 2006

Worth watching. Better then the comic book. My girlfriend wanted to see it again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AulbathMar 18, 2006

Excellent film. Inspiring ideas, excellent actors, and a nice british touch. If you think a bit about things, you realise, the we are already heading fullspeed to the future depicted in V for Vendetta. This one is up there with Fahrenheit Excellent film. Inspiring ideas, excellent actors, and a nice british touch. If you think a bit about things, you realise, the we are already heading fullspeed to the future depicted in V for Vendetta. This one is up there with Fahrenheit 451 and Orwell's 1984. An important piece of film, with a strong connection to todays political situation. Big brother is watching you!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AaronN.Mar 19, 2006

Def a movie that has to be seen in the theater. Nice special effects, I would expect nothing less from the Bros. I wish that they spent more time on character development. The comics were much more into the back stories of each character, Def a movie that has to be seen in the theater. Nice special effects, I would expect nothing less from the Bros. I wish that they spent more time on character development. The comics were much more into the back stories of each character, but I guess that's all you can do in the timeframe that they had.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

EricS.Mar 26, 2006

After hearing Alan Moore's (the writer of the graphic novel) complaints, I came into this movie expecting a typical, watered-down Hollywood flick. Although there were some changes from the original source material, "V for Vendetta" was After hearing Alan Moore's (the writer of the graphic novel) complaints, I came into this movie expecting a typical, watered-down Hollywood flick. Although there were some changes from the original source material, "V for Vendetta" was still a great, though-provoking film that didn't pull any punches. Whether you agree with the politics or not (which should by no means determine your opinion of the movie), you can't deny that the directors told an exciting and intelligent story. All this would have been for nothing if not for the great acting. Nataly Portman proved once again that "Star Wars" doesn't represent her acting abilities, and deserves a lot of credit for making a fully masked character seem human. The only flaws were in the over-simplifying of certain characters and situations. For example, the "evil" portrayal of the government was taken to the extreme, making it less believable that they could have gained the love of so many people. In the graphic novel, the high chancellor was a multi-dimensional character who was made sympathetic by his isolation and inability to relate to humans. The film should have followed that example, instead of making him your typical raving lunatic. Additionally, the whole scene at the end with everyone in a Guy Fawkes mask was a little too over the top. It was like the directors didn't trust the viewers to understand the spreading of V's ideal if they weren't bludgeoned over the head with it. However, despite those flaws "V for Vendetta" was still a great movie that goes above and beyond typical Hollywood films. Put aside your politics and preconceived notions and judge it on its own merits. You may not agree with the political message, but there is no denying that "V for Vendetta" is both thought provoking, and exceptionally well crafted.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BobbyApr 17, 2006

I really liked V for Vendetta. It is probably the best film playing in theatres right now. I recommend everybody to go see it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

SimonB.Aug 19, 2006

I love it. I love all of you. I wonder what is it people go for in movies anymore. We complain about acting, about facts, about realism. Then we complain this or that is not true, or this and that is ripped off that guy's book. HEY. Let I love it. I love all of you. I wonder what is it people go for in movies anymore. We complain about acting, about facts, about realism. Then we complain this or that is not true, or this and that is ripped off that guy's book. HEY. Let me remind you something real quick, boys. A movie isn't reality. V for Vendetta is an attempt at reproducing a book's story into visual interest. Had they actually made the entire book into a movie, you'd not have two hours on your hands, but perhaps SIX full hours. [***SPOILERS***] Many of the events were crossed out to squeeze the movie into something as short as possible, while remaining entertaining. What REALLY MATTERED about this movie's success, was that it STAYED loyal to its origins. Not that it entered the norms of literacy and whatever other crap some of you may complain about. In terms of cinematography, this movie blends in together theatrical pleasure and drama perfectly well. You might as well feel that most scenes are shot much like a Shakespearian play. (I'm gonna get flamed for this one in the future) You may be called simplistic by some pseudo-intellectual people for liking this movie. But what counts is not the quantity of references you may attach to it. It's the quality of them. The movie stayed true to the book in many facts, aside that it replaced the past of the book with today. Instead of the Cold War ending with general nuclear warfare, it was America's war on Iraq which spread out too much for its own good. It's not very likely to happen, but the movie reflects "what ifs". Other people may even complain about not understanding a thing that is said. Those people just are looking for a typical action movie, where nearly no acting is given and more gunning and killing occurs. V justified every fighting sequence, and made them count into the storyline. Now, remember dear children of cinematography: You're not looking for pure masterpieces when watching a movie. You're looking for entertainment and something of VISUAL and AUDITIVE quality. You may discuss politics when watching the news, otherwise you are just messing with the useless.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

8

ryancarroll88Aug 27, 2010

This blast of subversive pop cinema is a thrill ride from beginning to end, and probably stands as the best film adaptation of all Alan Moore's work. However, the production is both propelled and impaired by the Wachowski Brothers' influenceThis blast of subversive pop cinema is a thrill ride from beginning to end, and probably stands as the best film adaptation of all Alan Moore's work. However, the production is both propelled and impaired by the Wachowski Brothers' influence - the stylized violence is bound to be campy in a few years' time and the dramatic storyline is carried too much by actors with the same serious deadpan British accent (hearing just audio, I doubt I'd be able to differentiate the voices.) Still, in the end, the movie gives us exactly what we want - controversy, an awesome antihero, and a huge, giant explosion.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

tonyGreenApr 30, 2012

A satisfying watch. An original plot, John Hurt is excellent, as ever. Not just a good popcorn action / thriller movie, although it is that too, an effective satire on the current political apathy and paranoia of British Politics today. AnA satisfying watch. An original plot, John Hurt is excellent, as ever. Not just a good popcorn action / thriller movie, although it is that too, an effective satire on the current political apathy and paranoia of British Politics today. An outlandish cautionary tale, but cautionary tales are important still.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MetalMan95Nov 5, 2010

Superb acting, really awesome lines, great action, and an effective political message. what more can you ask for?? This was really well done and there were scenes when i was like "yes!"

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

CritiqueGirlMar 2, 2011

I gave it an 8 only because it was much too violent in the end. I saw both the TV version, still somewhat violent, and cable not realizing it was the R version until well into the end. I thought it was a great film as it was not justI gave it an 8 only because it was much too violent in the end. I saw both the TV version, still somewhat violent, and cable not realizing it was the R version until well into the end. I thought it was a great film as it was not just original, directed and acted well, but I found it to be artsy. Usually Americans cannot execute or enjoy the artsy films like the Europeans can. It has a message about people vs. governments but in a way that is not offensive.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

grandpajoe6191Oct 4, 2011

Now, "V for Vendetta" here is a great example of how graphic novel-based books should be when made into a movie. The story is deeply involved into the movie as well as the characters and their significance. Natalie Portman especially does aNow, "V for Vendetta" here is a great example of how graphic novel-based books should be when made into a movie. The story is deeply involved into the movie as well as the characters and their significance. Natalie Portman especially does a exceptional, outstanding performance as V's girlfriend (?). Must watch!!!… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

8

imthenoobMar 16, 2012

I really liked the movie. The plot was very interesting. The acting was good for the most part (I wasnt satisfied by some of the supporting cast). What hurt this movie was the poor action sequences, pathetic death scenes (such as in the finalI really liked the movie. The plot was very interesting. The acting was good for the most part (I wasnt satisfied by some of the supporting cast). What hurt this movie was the poor action sequences, pathetic death scenes (such as in the final fight of the film), and the painfully obvious fake blood. It was a little disapointing imo. However, Its still a very solid movie that is well worth the watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

beingryanjudeAug 27, 2014

Cinema at its finest. V for Vendetta is a prime example of thrilling an audience and entertaining them amidst a dystopia. Natalie Portman is magnificent--but did we really expect any less from her? Nope!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

rishab_babjiApr 20, 2013

Based on the comic series by Vertigo (DC Comics Label) a movie with a gripping storyline, intense moments and a stupefying script is created by the Wachowski Brothers, foretelling a possible prophecy for future generations about totalitarianBased on the comic series by Vertigo (DC Comics Label) a movie with a gripping storyline, intense moments and a stupefying script is created by the Wachowski Brothers, foretelling a possible prophecy for future generations about totalitarian super-countries like America and Britain. Amazing twists and unsolved mysteries, coupled with the cunning and menacing freedom fighter V (Hugo Weaving) juxtaposed to the beautiful and extraordinary Eve (Natalie Portman) creates a movie that can be watched many times without getting old.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

StaticSpineSep 17, 2013

Great atmosphere of dystopia and dictatorship. Nice graphic novel-based story. I can call this movie uhh...inspirational. It convinces that everyone should fight for his rights and freedom.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Feb 1, 2013

With a story that's as politically potent as it is brilliantly structured, "V For Vendetta" makes for an uncommonly enthralling action-thriller with a very salient point.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

sanyrubDec 29, 2016

Daring, vibrant, intelligent, full of innovative little twists and with the right actress to pull it off. The whole 2 hour-long run time flies as the film keeps it interesting and with the right pace. Underrated film (cannot believe thisDaring, vibrant, intelligent, full of innovative little twists and with the right actress to pull it off. The whole 2 hour-long run time flies as the film keeps it interesting and with the right pace. Underrated film (cannot believe this barely surpassed a 60 out of 100 when it comes to the critics average score) that probably suffered from the London terrorist attacks that same year. Time to re-watch or discover this little treasure. See it!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

eagleeyevikingDec 17, 2013

V for Vendetta feels like a vendetta against the government but one can not help admire its deeply thought characters, great visuals and good storyline & premise.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

inaneswineNov 14, 2017

Its narrative is quite contrived and melodramatic - but in this case, it really doesn't matter. Its powerful message is hammered home with great intensity, supported by an excellent cast and great visuals. V for Vendetta will be a fantasticIts narrative is quite contrived and melodramatic - but in this case, it really doesn't matter. Its powerful message is hammered home with great intensity, supported by an excellent cast and great visuals. V for Vendetta will be a fantastic thrill-ride for some, and a strongly-worded cautionary tale for others.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

vikesh2206Nov 10, 2014

V for Vendetta feels like a personal vendetta against today's government but one can not help admire its deeply thought characters, great visuals and intriguing storyline & premise.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

Cinemassacre94Mar 20, 2016

By all rights, this should be the worst time imaginable to release V For Vendetta, a film with—there's really no polite word for it—a terrorist hero prone to saying things like "Violence can be used for good," and "Sometimes blowing up aBy all rights, this should be the worst time imaginable to release V For Vendetta, a film with—there's really no polite word for it—a terrorist hero prone to saying things like "Violence can be used for good," and "Sometimes blowing up a building can change the world." So why does V For Vendetta play as such a crowd-pleaser? The answer is simple and unsettling. Set in a totalitarian future-Britain that pairs the dystopian state of George Orwell's 1984 with the brutality of Nazi Germany, it makes heroes out of the treasonous by calling up our repulsion for historical fascist atrocities, but also by relying on us to recognize how fascism can inch into everyday life in the name of security. It's a preemptive strike for resistance, and a reminder that freedom demands protection.

Hugo Weaving plays liberty's self-appointed guardian, a man in a Guy Fawkes mask who calls himself "V" and lives in a bunker filled with forbidden art, from Hans Holbein to Cat Power. Taking his mission public, he blows up the Old Bailey shortly after rescuing Natalie Portman—an office drone working for Britain's single TV network—from a gang of sexually aggressive policemen. Later, he brings her underground, making her a reluctant (at least initially) accomplice in a plot to topple the government.

Written and produced by Larry and Andy Wachowski of Matrix fame, and directed by Matrix second-unit director James McTeigue, the film reworks an '80s graphic novel illustrated by David Lloyd and written by Alan Moore (uncredited here, by his own choice) as a howl of rage against where Moore felt the Thatcher administration was headed. It is, in its essence, a remarkably faithful adaptation that should have perhaps stayed even more faithful. Only when the script and visuals stray too far from the source does the film lose its way, getting bogged down in the mechanics of big-budget action filmmaking and ponderous dialogue as it works toward a way-too-tidy, sentimental finale.

The mask doesn't always help either, making it hard for Portman and Weaving to build the relationship the story requires. Weaving stepped into the role when James Purefoy stepped out (though some of Purefoy's scenes remain), and many shots suggest what undid him: It's hard to convey emotion behind a perpetual smile. And emotion does enter into it: One long monologue (taken almost directly from Moore) that's worked into a vicious sequence depicting Portman's personal awakening is simultaneously uplifting and harrowing, a call for freedom even in the face of grave consequences. V For Vendetta tries, but it never quite achieves the same tone elsewhere. Mostly, it's content to remain a compelling, visually striking political mystery with some big ideas woven into it—subversive notions about integrity, liberty, and political change. And though it stutters in getting it out, the film clearly means what it says. As weapons against oppression go, passion and sincerity can sometimes do more damage than a bomb.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

eva3si0nMay 13, 2022

V for Vendetta is a great dystopian movie. Good plot and lovely cast. A well-designed dystopia, you can feel the influence of the Wachowski brothers. Everyone can be advised to watch, given that there is no real democracy left.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

spacebear1Dec 8, 2017

This is an outstandingly amazing film. The lead characters, Hugo Weaving's V and Natalie Portman's Evey Hammond, were portrayed amazingly. The film doesn't have some cheesy romance, instead it has a more professional relationship between theThis is an outstandingly amazing film. The lead characters, Hugo Weaving's V and Natalie Portman's Evey Hammond, were portrayed amazingly. The film doesn't have some cheesy romance, instead it has a more professional relationship between the two. This film also takes enough time to flesh out it's characters. The final battle is awesome and was very climactic. My favorite part of the film is it's themes about standing up for whats right no matter what. In the end, this is an amazing film with barely anything wrong with it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

hardcorekiddMay 14, 2018

Following world war, London is a police state occupied by a fascist government, and a vigilante known only as V (Hugo Weaving) uses terrorist tactics to fight the oppressors of the world in which he now lives. When V saves a young woman namedFollowing world war, London is a police state occupied by a fascist government, and a vigilante known only as V (Hugo Weaving) uses terrorist tactics to fight the oppressors of the world in which he now lives. When V saves a young woman named Evey (Natalie Portman) from the secret police, he discovers an ally in his fight against England's oppressors. Visually stunning and thought-provoking, V For Vendetta's political pronouncements may rile some, but its story and impressive set pieces will nevertheless entertain. V for Vendetta gets an A-.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

jonslowDec 9, 2018

You want to see where the "Nationalist" movement around the World is leading us? Think "it can't happen here"? Watch this and despair - or grow a pair.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

NG2087Aug 28, 2019

One of the most influential movies of the DC Universe till date. You always feel the freshness of the subject whenever you watch the movie. Some don't find the movie interesting, perhaps because they don't realize the danger envisioned in theOne of the most influential movies of the DC Universe till date. You always feel the freshness of the subject whenever you watch the movie. Some don't find the movie interesting, perhaps because they don't realize the danger envisioned in the movie. As V rightly says - People are used to - "The Security of the Familiar, tranquility of repetition..."… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

RobwinzApr 19, 2020

This movie is really good, Evey Hammond (Natalie Portman) and V (Hugo Weaving) have some amazing chemistry with each other throughout most scenes. Also, this movie has got an interesting plot with some really good camerawork during most ofThis movie is really good, Evey Hammond (Natalie Portman) and V (Hugo Weaving) have some amazing chemistry with each other throughout most scenes. Also, this movie has got an interesting plot with some really good camerawork during most of the fight scenes and some of the other main scenes throughout this movie. Finally, it's got some really powerful and hearted scenes throughout with some really good effects which do hold up quite well. The only effect which sort of bugged me was probably the blood effect, it was very mixed for me there would be moments where it looked really good and some where it looked like the Mortal Kombat 2 blood effect. Overall, it's a really good movie with some amazing actors, an interesting plot and some really good bloody fight scenes, worth the watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Kirollos_NoahJul 29, 2020

First of all, what's so hard to neglect, the performances! Everyone in this movie did an amazing job, especially Hugo Weaving who was wearing a mask for the whole runtime, and still we could see and feel every emotion and every reaction andFirst of all, what's so hard to neglect, the performances! Everyone in this movie did an amazing job, especially Hugo Weaving who was wearing a mask for the whole runtime, and still we could see and feel every emotion and every reaction and his face, he delivered an amazing character without even seeing his face! And that was great, I liked that for the whole movie we didn't get to see his face at all and that even when he took off his mask in one scene his face was so shadowy that we couldn't see it, that shows that, as he said, the mask is now his face and not the one beneath.

Natalie Portman is also great in this movie, everyone is great in this movie, there isn't one bad performance or even a character that was badly built, everyone was great!

The plot is very intriguing, it's very easy to start this movie not that interested, and within a couple of minutes you just get very hooked, and that's where McTeigue shines, he built this atmosphere, and this futuristic world in a way that can keep you very intrigued in no time! The plot is so smart, and the movie can help it but to get even better with each scene, the movie is always going up intensely and smartly, it never loses its mystique nor its heart!

What McTeigue has done amazingly was the editing, though it didn't always work, and we'll get to that later, for the most part, the editing is what makes this movie very good to look at, because visually, and I don't mean special effects, this movie is just beautiful! That shows in a lot of scenes, for instance, the scene where Evey was on the rooftop, and she was walking under the rain, feeling like she's being reborn, and the shots where V was coming out of the fire, feeling like he's being reborn as well, were merged in a way that makes this scene beyond perfect!

The screenplay is also very well-written, every line was well-crafted, smart dialogue that makes this movie amazing and intriguing.

You know a great movie when you look at the main characters at the beginning of the movie, and then you check them out again at the end of it and you see how different they are, and how good they were developed, this movie has one of the best characters development in comic book movies! You take a look at Evey's character and you see her at the beginning, a very simple and nice girl, who's not that brave but still trying to protect herself, you see her at the end, and I don't wanna get into spoilers, and you just can't believe that this is her, she took her time to be "reborn" and that made the audience care about her very much. The same happened with a lot of characters, and a lot of characters you look at them thinking that they're not that important, or you think of them that they're those a-holes, but when you get to know their secrets or their backstories you just can't help it but to love them as well!

Some people will go to watch this movie expecting a ton of action sequences like The Matrix, even the trailer showed us that this movie is gonna have a lot of action sequences, but no, this movie doesn't have a lot of that, and a lot of people will get disappointed, but for me, I don't care, the movie has a couple of that, and that was enough for me, it's the drama and the thriller that intrigued me and made me entertained, so here's the thing, don't go to this movie expecting The Matrix, it has a couple of action sequences, but that's about it, this movie is a crime, drama, and thriller.

This movie is not by any means perfect, it has a couple of flaws, and what bothered me was some of the editings, I know I said is that this is where McTeigue shines, but some of it just didn't work, for example, there's a scene with V and Evey watching the TV, and the news of the death of a certain character is being broadcasted, she asks him if he's behind this, and he confirms it, she asks him if he's gonna do it again, and he says "yes" and the scene ends, for me, it felt unfinished, I thought that there will be more, some kind of a conversation about why he thinks to kill is the answer, but there wasn't, and that happened often in this movie.

What I also didn't like was the exposition scenes, it happened more often, it wasn't badly made or anything, but it was frequently used, and it didn't work for me because the movie seemed smarter than this to me.

In the end, V for Vendetta is a great comic book movie, if you liked the graphic novel, I don't see why would you hate this movie, just forget what everyone's saying about this movie, and go see it for yourself. I'm gonna give V for Vendetta an A-!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MrPajamasJul 3, 2021

Nowadays it's quite a classic and for me a solid hit. The lovely Natalie Portman as Evey alongside V, who we can't see his face and yet is so charismatic and interesting. Add to that the legendary mask that is now the symbol of Anonymous. TheNowadays it's quite a classic and for me a solid hit. The lovely Natalie Portman as Evey alongside V, who we can't see his face and yet is so charismatic and interesting. Add to that the legendary mask that is now the symbol of Anonymous. The story is a blast too. The only mischief for me are the CGI moments, which were pretty meh and even for the time I think they could have been better. Otherwise, for me, this is a great movie that I recommend and Remember, Remember, the 5th of November.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

So fun to watch, with great performances and character development. Hope we ever get to live in a society like that.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

LanxturnApr 8, 2021

One of my favorite movies of all time. An absolute blast to watch and be parallel to either turn your brain off to watch or to pay attention to every close detail they present. It of course, is far from perfect but still is an amazing rideOne of my favorite movies of all time. An absolute blast to watch and be parallel to either turn your brain off to watch or to pay attention to every close detail they present. It of course, is far from perfect but still is an amazing ride and I totally recommend it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

jdavenportOct 27, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. V for Vendetta is a movie adaptation of the comic book of the same name. The plot centers around a mysterious masked man only known as "V." V lives in a dystopian, totalitarian, alternate world than the real world we inhabit. In the world of this movie, the government sets stringent restrictions on its citizens. Most forms of art and expression are outlawed. Nobody except for the corrupt cops that run the city are allowed outside after curfew. This corruption is shown multiple times throughout the movie, as the ideas of a corrupt government, freedom, and expression run rampant. One such example happens near the beginning when Evey, a civilian woman, walks to an address she has written down while the street speakers alert everyone that a curfew is in effect. Some of the city's crooked cops come up and crudely inform her that it is past curfew, then they proceed to attempt to rape Evey. V comes in at the last moment and saves Evey, taking her in.
V is labeled as a terrorist in this film due to his opposition to the corrupt government. This movie's ideas are arguably the most crucial criteria of my review, as that is more or less the movie's point. "Remember the idea, not the man, because a man can fail." V, the "terrorist," is painted as a freedom fighter of sorts and is put in a sympathetic light. He collects everything that the government has banned to add to his collection. V has a special surprise waiting for the government on the fifth of November. The idea of standing firm and fighting for individual freedom is a huge draw to this movie, and the character of V personifies that idea. Besides fighting for freedom, V is a master of many kinds of combat, especially with bladed weapons. The action scenes in this movie are done very well and allow the viewers to see what is happening, unlike many more recent action films where quick cuts make it impossible to discern how the fight is going. The action scenes also occasionally add a bit of humor, be it through his juxtaposed relaxed demeanor, making alliterative poems in the middle of battle, or simply slicing a man's belt off with his sword and watching his pants fall.

The only negative in this movie, in my opinion, is the occasional CGI. While all of the practical effects look good, some of the CGI leaves more to be desired. The fight scene with Creedy and his goons near the end is an example of this. Presumably, the sword effects intend to mimic the action lines in comics; however, they seem to bring me out of the moment some. The blood effects do not look very convincing either.

Overall, V for Vendetta is an excellent movie with a fascinating message. It seems like the film has aged like a fine wine considering the recent discourse with governments worldwide. I would recommend this movie wholeheartedly.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JosakAug 2, 2006

I thought the movie was a little bland. It had an interesting story and some cool ideas, but I thought the execution was off. Still worth seeing though.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

MckMar 18, 2006

Decent movie, but it's slow pace will mean many might not like it!

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

GregA.Aug 22, 2006

This was a good comic book film with good plot and, unusually for such films, an intelligible script. But why do people want serious political messages from such a genre? Some have compared it with 1984 and Brave New World. This is just sad. This was a good comic book film with good plot and, unusually for such films, an intelligible script. But why do people want serious political messages from such a genre? Some have compared it with 1984 and Brave New World. This is just sad. Obviously it could be better (so could everything) but there are some good touches: the use of a 16/17th century Catholic terrorist as a symbol of modern freedom was nicely ironic, whilst the vision of thousands of Guy Fawkes attending the destruction of the Houses of Parliament was very good indeed (I am English by the way).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

KevinG.Mar 20, 2006

The premise behind the film was excellent, sadly the film was to be foud lacking generally. The plot is sluggish and is far too choppy and the way the back story is weaved in takes away form the the current action (of which there is'nt The premise behind the film was excellent, sadly the film was to be foud lacking generally. The plot is sluggish and is far too choppy and the way the back story is weaved in takes away form the the current action (of which there is'nt half enough anyway). When the the action scenes happened they were good especially the ending knife sequence whch is worth the ticket entry alone.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SeanR.Apr 13, 2006

What a great movie! Everything i like about it has been said by other people but was anyone else really dissapointed by Natalie Portman's performance? I really liked her in star wars, closer and garden state but what happend to her in What a great movie! Everything i like about it has been said by other people but was anyone else really dissapointed by Natalie Portman's performance? I really liked her in star wars, closer and garden state but what happend to her in this movie?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

RobertB.Mar 19, 2006

The comparison of this future Biritain to Nazi's works since the government gains power by releasing biological weapons on their own people. This movie finds a nice balance between the personal stories dotting the story landscape and The comparison of this future Biritain to Nazi's works since the government gains power by releasing biological weapons on their own people. This movie finds a nice balance between the personal stories dotting the story landscape and the big picture of politics and history. All while not going too far into the politics (like a Lucas film might). The action scenes were generally the weakest pieces, but were also few. Good job by the Wachowskis.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ANTONYK.Mar 19, 2006

After listening to Jonathan Ross slate the movie as "a complete mess" and "nothing but nothing works" I decide to find out for myself and to be honest I can see his point. The movie has its problems the dialogue is terrible a superhero who After listening to Jonathan Ross slate the movie as "a complete mess" and "nothing but nothing works" I decide to find out for myself and to be honest I can see his point. The movie has its problems the dialogue is terrible a superhero who likes to qoute shakespeare when kicking ass just does not work,and there could have been better action,the positives were the hijack of the media building where we see some interesting scenes and the end fight scene in the tunnel,to call it a complete disaster is a little harsh,it does have some positive points just the pretentious poetic verses are weak and pointless,interesting if undramatic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

CJMar 20, 2006

Quite a good see, even if a bit controversial. Intriguing vision of extreme politicians striking fear into the hearts of the citizens, but not unrealistic in parts. Was annoyed by the long scenes without changing to another set of characters.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

PrintNinjaMar 20, 2006

Was it great? No. Was it good? Yes! There have been better tellings of this tale, but none that I've enjoyed more on the big screen. One problem with such diverse and deep material is that it's hard to expand on every single Was it great? No. Was it good? Yes! There have been better tellings of this tale, but none that I've enjoyed more on the big screen. One problem with such diverse and deep material is that it's hard to expand on every single tangent. In this story, you have concurrently being told the history of the last 30 something years of the world, the personal back stories of the two main protagonists, the personal backstories of the main antagonist and two of his henchmen, a number of heavy general concepts - social injustice, political oppression, justice vs revenge, liberalism vs conservatism, terrorists vs freedom fighters, resurrection of the spirit, god vs man, and the minor issues of childhood development in the abscence of parents, the long-term effects of torture on the psyche, and how many obscure references to Shakespear can you squeeze into a movie without losing your non-literary audience. To touch on so many subjects without losing focus on the story, becoming mawkish or predictible, or appealing to the lowest common Hollywood denomenator is an admirable feat. Movies of this calibre have to pander *slightly* to the masses if they want to make a profit. This is reality. Too much action at the expense of a story, and you risk getting laughed at. To much intellectualism at the expense of action, and you end up with people walking out of the theater, yawning or scratching their heads (I know people who hated the first hour of the Matrix, but loved the second.) Granted, there were some predictable scenes. We all knew she had been "kidnapped" by V, and if she had come out of it the same person, the whole segment would have been pointless. But, that was the fire-walk for her, and even though they beat us over the head with the visual imagery, the segment was necessary. The ending was predictible as well, but from the beginning we already KNEW what was going to happen at the end. That didn't mean we didn't want to see each and every explosive frame. Movies, if they are thoughtful and visually interesting, can afford a little predictability. The first Batman wasn't particularly deep, but the futuristic art deco landscape kept your eyes glued to the screen, and distracted you from the simplistic plot. Both Batman and V for Vendetta followed the same rule - there's no such thing as safe advertising. Books rely on the reader to envision the author's creation. Movies adapted from books present the viewer with one persons vision, perhaps quite different from their own, and this can be disconcerting. That doesn't make it wrong. Film is also a time-limited medium. It's often taken for granted that people reading a book can spend as much, or as little time as they like combining details and narrative in order to visualize the author's workd. It's a trade-off, and one of the reasons it's so difficult to adapt books to movies. I read Star Wars a year before I saw the film, and while some things in the film came across seemlessly, others were totally unsettling. From reading the book, my perception of droids was quite different from what I saw on screen. I also got the impression that the space battle at the end was much longer then what I saw in the film. This was no doubt a consequence of those expensive 1970's special effects. There were many places where V for Vendetta could have taken a wrong turn, and ended up down a dead end, but didn't. For example, imagine if Natale Portman HAD, (in the typically cliched Hollywood fashion) taken off V's mask and kissed his scarred face! We'd have all run screaming from the theater, "noooooo!" Thank goodness they didn't do it. It was far more moving, to see her kiss the mask, and have to imagine his awkward reaction behind it. Since I've never read the book, I can't comment on how V for Vendetta stands as an adaptation, but as a film on its own, it stands up quite well. It's good fare, but not great, and nowadays, with all the cookie-cutter crud out there, I think a movie like this has to be forgiven a little, especially if it makes you think while entertaining you.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

GDMar 22, 2006

I'm a little suprised by the negative reviews. I thought, for the most part, the film was about as close an adaptation of the graphic novel as you could get (except for the ending). And while the acting may have been poor and the film I'm a little suprised by the negative reviews. I thought, for the most part, the film was about as close an adaptation of the graphic novel as you could get (except for the ending). And while the acting may have been poor and the film far from earth-shattering, the story did show how totalitarian governments start. People who live in fear, apathy, and/or anger, trust their leaders to get revenge or take back what is "theirs." The lies begin and that is the beginning of the end. Is the U.S. on a similar path? Hardly. Conservatives may bristle at the allusions to Bush and Iraq but I saw more Stalinism, fascism and the novel,1984, than the War on Terror, which is what the graphic novel was depicting (in 1982 no less). The filmmakers added those elements for contemporary reasons. I am surprised that so often Conservatives and the religious-right always feel like they have to shout down the opposing view or defend their position even in a movie review. Relax, it's just a movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ChadS.Mar 22, 2006

In the battle of allegorical movies about our current administration, I think V for "The Village" wins, but Natalie Portman's bald head and John Hurt's role reversal(in reference to the Orwell novel, and the Bush-hatin' doc In the battle of allegorical movies about our current administration, I think V for "The Village" wins, but Natalie Portman's bald head and John Hurt's role reversal(in reference to the Orwell novel, and the Bush-hatin' doc "Orwell Rolls in his Grave") entertained me enough to ignore the occasional bombast of its politics. Hurt, in imitation of the fuhrer, reminded me of Robert F. Kennedy's appearance of Hannity and Colmes, in which the environmental attorney compared Bush to Hitler. And Portman, late in the film, you half-expect her to wail, "I don't know no shame/I feel no pain/I can't," as if channeling the Sinnead O'Connor persona that produced "Mandinka". Unlike her "Star Wars" stint, Portman doesn't look overwhelmed by the spectacle, looking equally comfortable in a police state as she did in "Garden State".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

GodComplexMar 24, 2006

Hey Kel R.... You do realize this is a movie right? Go suck George Bush off some where else. Comparing this movie to the Democrates is like comparing Brokeback Mt. to the Republicans. Anyways it's a descent film folks. It's entertaining.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

CLJul 13, 2006

to Mr. RM:

perhaps if you had finished watching this film instead of leaving to go home and get hard over SAW (clever, but stupidly violent movie) for the millionth time you may have been able to appreciate the depth of this film. The factto Mr. RM:

perhaps if you had finished watching this film instead of leaving to go home and get hard over SAW (clever, but stupidly violent movie) for the millionth time you may have been able to appreciate the depth of this film. The fact that you can: A) call it a dumb film without even seeing the end of it and B) classify anything as "Dumb" like a 5 year old would mearly proves that this film was not "Dumn" simply you are too simple minded and sadistic to understand it. I thought this was a great movie and is probably one of the only movies that has actually made me think about it beyond the cinema door.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JohnM.Jun 22, 2008

A deeply flawed yet deeply beautiful movie. Its reach exceeds its grasp, and only scratches the surface of the problems, principles and conundrums it purports to engage with, but as a stirring visual poem on our occasional responsibility to A deeply flawed yet deeply beautiful movie. Its reach exceeds its grasp, and only scratches the surface of the problems, principles and conundrums it purports to engage with, but as a stirring visual poem on our occasional responsibility to be irresponsible, it satisfies and stirs. Don't expect to be challenged, but don't expect to be talked down to either. Personally I'm glad to see a story such as this given the pop culture treatment, and mercifully lose relatively little. The dialogue leaves much to be desired, but V's monologues are superb, and Weaving's ability to connect from behind a mask is commendable. My only real objection is that the Beautiful Lesbian Love Story gets ten glorious minutes, while the male-on-male Mapplethorpe pictures get all of three seconds from an obscure angle :) (Also, anyone who makes kneejerk references to this as "liberal, leftist" propaganda clearly doesn't know what either of those words mean, and would probably be the perfect constituent for the movie's dictator!).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

GaborA.Mar 18, 2006

Well done almost living up to its grand ambitions for most of the duration minus the end. There is an obvious build up to the final climax which to say the least is laughable. Original ideas and well written intentionally pretentious script Well done almost living up to its grand ambitions for most of the duration minus the end. There is an obvious build up to the final climax which to say the least is laughable. Original ideas and well written intentionally pretentious script make V worth seeing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

TomOlsenMar 24, 2006

A visual treat, and the supporting cast is great. I liked Portman as the heroine, but Weaving always behind the mask got tedious. As for the our-culture-is-a-gulag politics, it's a leftist agi-prop fantasy. But I believe that movieA visual treat, and the supporting cast is great. I liked Portman as the heroine, but Weaving always behind the mask got tedious. As for the our-culture-is-a-gulag politics, it's a leftist agi-prop fantasy. But I believe that movie writers hate GWB that much... Lord knows there's plenty of supporting evidence all around us.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

LittleMickeyMar 25, 2006

Just so we are clear, this film neither glorifies terorism nor does it say democracy is bad. It simply asks sensible questions; like what powers should governments have? and what is the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter? Just so we are clear, this film neither glorifies terorism nor does it say democracy is bad. It simply asks sensible questions; like what powers should governments have? and what is the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter? Questions in the current global environment anyone worth their salt should be aking themselves. Anyway, how can a film whos tagline is 'people should not be affraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of thier people' be anti-democracy etc, etc? However even though this film challenges its audience to ask itself questions, and even though Hugo Weaving was exceptional, it wasn't the most entertaining film i've seen and its not as though other sources haven't challenged us to ask these questions before, hence the 7.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

HadenD.Mar 28, 2006

didnt have "the edge" it needed, with no edge it was just compounded psychobable with excellent performances by both leads, never seen natalie more dramatic.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

deedeeMar 10, 2011

Likable movie. The story was unique and at some points touching. I loved the twists and the games V planned for everyone. It was like he was the master of puppets :) And also, actors did their job very well.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

InsanityOnABunDec 18, 2012

This film turned out to be nothing like I thought it would, and that's a good thing. The performances were interesting, convincing, and my whole rating could easily be just for Hugo Weaving's amazing "V" monologue.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SEROJMar 12, 2013

I remember when my sister bought Guy Fawks's mask for my birthday! This movie is just great! A wonderful and emotional action MUST WATCH! My score is 7/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SuperheroMoviesAug 1, 2013

Not to be mistaken for a serious jab at political scrutiny, it is still an undeniably exhilarating vigilante thriller with enough wit and provocative dialogue to suffice.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Meth-dudeJan 18, 2015

The movie is slow but,the at ors are really good and the action scenes are well made.The atmosphere is scary and V is one of the best "villain".The end is really good even if the movie was predictable.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

alejandro970Dec 5, 2020

I don't know the original graphic novel so I can't determine how faithful the adaptation is. As a genre film, with a certain 1984 flavor, it works quietly and well, although not to be kept in memory forever.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

CoreGamer1408Apr 18, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. V is perfectly cast for sure. His side kick not so much. Leaving the writers clear and obvious bias out of the equation. This is still pretty powerful stuff. Which could of been about any ideologically driven authoritarian regime which led to the resulting revolutionary fallout due to state oppression (and mad science).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

annbdJun 28, 2018

V for Vendetta I would describe as 'The best F*** the government' film. It was not another fantasy-super hero movie with super predictable storyline - saving everybody, while a great love flares and of course - happy ending. Decent movie.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoFeb 12, 2018

This film focuses on the mysterious figure V, a masked without name or identity that stands against the English government. Everything takes place in a dystopian future, where parliamentary democracy gave way to a totalitarian one-partyThis film focuses on the mysterious figure V, a masked without name or identity that stands against the English government. Everything takes place in a dystopian future, where parliamentary democracy gave way to a totalitarian one-party government, based on a strongly nationalist, repressive and ultra-conservative ideology. Inspired by a catholic conspiracy of the seventeenth century (the Gunpowder Plot), V declares himself a defender of democracy, starts a terror campaign against the government and incites the people to revolt against dictatorship. But, what no one knows is that V is driven by a desire of vengeance linked to his mysterious past. By his side is Evey Hammond, a young woman who is saved by V and eventually become close to him.

The film is an adaptation of a comic book written by Alan Moore and illustrated by David Lloyd in the eighties. It was directed by James McTeigue, who also directed the "Matrix" trilogy and that seems to have a particular taste for Orwellian dystopias. The cast is headed by Hugo Weaving and Natalie Portmann in the roles of V and Evey, having been at a great level and toasted the audience with excellent performances. Very interesting are also some dialogs and talks, in particular the way that V introduces himself before Evey in the beginning of the film, where almost every word he says begin with the letter V. The character was able to transcend their individuality and become a symbol of struggle, with a gentle touch of anarchism. Such a strong symbol that, even today, we see masks similar to those used in this film in many protests around the world.

The only negative note: this film does, although perhaps without that intention, a "defense" that the ends justify the means, and no matter the destruction of public buildings, works of art and historical monuments when we are looking, through this gesture, to defend an idea or cause that we thought to be important. However, this is terrorism, and the people who does it are that fanatics that we used to condemn in other movies and in real life, which makes this idea too dangerous to be "supported" by films like this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

zNeverSleepingAug 10, 2020

Interesting at all

Toda iconografia relacionada ao V é, no mínimo, interessante. Acredito que nos dias de hoje, o filme leve o público a uma discussão bem interessante e necessária. Claro que já vimos um cenário parecido com o do filme naInteresting at all

Toda iconografia relacionada ao V é, no mínimo, interessante. Acredito que nos dias de hoje, o filme leve o público a uma discussão bem interessante e necessária. Claro que já vimos um cenário parecido com o do filme na vida real diversas vezes. Mas porque o repetimos? E nessa década em específico, nunca foi tão fácil encontrar um grupo de ódio sobre diversos assuntos.

A voz de V é muito peculiar e bem interpretada. Gostei muito de não terem mostrado seu rosto, o que seria um apelo hipócrita. Natalie Portman não me convence muito, mas devo admitir que ela é esforçada. Gostei também de Stephen Rea como uma espécie de Detetive. Se tratando do personagem, acredito que o desenvolvimento deve deveria ter sido mais impactante, mas eu entendo que o propósito foi entregue e concluído.

Por fim, o filme tem um enredo gostoso de se acompanhar. A face misteriosa do V carrega um suspense imenso. "O que, quando e porque?"
Aqui as respostas são satisfatórias e refletem muito bem a realidade.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MarcillisMar 3, 2020

I find this movie rather ambiguous. On the one hand, almost all laws of the genre are observed in the film. On the other hand, the plot cannot be called straightforward, and the actions of the heroes make you think about how justified theyI find this movie rather ambiguous. On the one hand, almost all laws of the genre are observed in the film. On the other hand, the plot cannot be called straightforward, and the actions of the heroes make you think about how justified they are and cause associations with the real world. After this movie, I started using the Utopia p2p application. The pluses can also be attributed to high-quality and sometimes exciting shooting, the game of actors, some interesting details.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JJ2FAS4UDec 29, 2021

----------------------------------7.3/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

HappyliveMay 7, 2022

anarşi zulüm haksızlık ve tüm konuları ele alan bazı sahneleriyle gerçek hayattaki sorunlara selam çakan kült yapımdır yetişkin ve idrak etme gücü olmayan insanların anlamayacağı yapımdır

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

V for Vendetta

User Reviews