Urban Legends: Final Cut

Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) | Release Date: September 22, 2000

3.4	USER SCORE Generally unfavorable reviews based on 74 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

AlliBMar 15, 2007

One of the scariest movies I've ever seen with a great plot and scarily convincing death scenes!

1 of 1 users found this helpful

Sosmooth1982Jan 14, 2023

Not as good as the first. Just an ok movie. Some of the kill scenes were pretty cool though. A director for a college is practicing with his students and filming a horror film in a amusement park type theme. That's when murders start happening.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

LuchidorAug 11, 2023

aqwwrtomvodmdinjbfyfygjgjfgfugugugughgugjhjhjguftdtfyfygjifydtuoommhhgdcsethknknohivyxrgsbjh

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

RikiegeNov 17, 2012

A great sequel that features comedy and terror.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

benderrodriguezMar 12, 2015

A Scream clone that was set in Trent University. It's nothing more than a retread of other teen scare movies. Trent University was perhaps the most redeemable feature about the movie with its beautiful scenery and modern architecture.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

AndrewM.Apr 4, 2004

Close to the worst film I have seen. I agree with most of the critics who rightly say this is rubbish. Only gets a point or two for the couple of mildly genuine scares it delivers but really, don't bother wasting your time watching it. Close to the worst film I have seen. I agree with most of the critics who rightly say this is rubbish. Only gets a point or two for the couple of mildly genuine scares it delivers but really, don't bother wasting your time watching it. Ohh, and other than being really bad it's really boring too!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

ElizabethPSep 27, 2005

Who decided that EVERY IDIOT gets to produce a movie? It's so GOD AWFUL and cliched!!!!! I wanted to cry and gouge out my own eyes after seeing THE WORST piece of crap in the world!!!!!!!!! Forget lethal injection or life imprisonment, Who decided that EVERY IDIOT gets to produce a movie? It's so GOD AWFUL and cliched!!!!! I wanted to cry and gouge out my own eyes after seeing THE WORST piece of crap in the world!!!!!!!!! Forget lethal injection or life imprisonment, make murderers watch this movie!!!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Meth-dudeNov 16, 2017

While not being as bad as it's predecessor, Urban Legends: Final Cut is still a below average slasher flick. The acting was average at best, the twin aspect of the movie is silly and completely unnecessary, the movie tries so hard toWhile not being as bad as it's predecessor, Urban Legends: Final Cut is still a below average slasher flick. The acting was average at best, the twin aspect of the movie is silly and completely unnecessary, the movie tries so hard to establish one of the characters as the obvious killer, that it's obviously not him and the characters were so stupid that it became infuriating. At least the movie as a whole was quite entertaining.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

FilipeNetoJun 25, 2018

After seeing the first "Urban Legends" movie, I wondered if it would be possible to do better, or even repeat the dose, without the second film being invariably disastrous. The answer is no.

In this film, Amy Mayfield, a young film student,After seeing the first "Urban Legends" movie, I wondered if it would be possible to do better, or even repeat the dose, without the second film being invariably disastrous. The answer is no.

In this film, Amy Mayfield, a young film student, has to make a short film as an end-of-course work. She decides to make a film in which a murderer kills his victims by recreating famous urban legends. Everything is going well until people really start to die, at the hands of a mysterious murderer.

Well, what we have here is the same recipe used in the first film. The difference is that, as we have already seen it, it does not surprise us. It's just another horror movie for teenagers, with a plot so weak that it's not even worth talking about it. It will shatter at the first pull as if it were a rotten rag. The cast is very weak, almost amateur. Jennifer Morrison, the lead actress, does nothing particularly good. She just does what has to be done. There are, however, some moments where it seems that the film makes some little veiled criticisms, but quickly leaves that aside. The ending is perhaps the best part of the film.

Despite being, in general, a frankly bad and forgettable film, it was a step forward in the career of many of those involved. Actresses like Eva Mendes, Matthew Davis or Jennifer Morrison had, shortly after, the opportunity to do more serious work: Mendes, for example, will have the opportunity to appear in "Once Upon a Time in Mexico" and Davis will cost to establish himself but, after years of small appearances, he will finally did it with "Vampire Diaries". Even the director, John Ottman, will discover that he is a terrible director but has a knack for other things in cinema, as music. So, I think this film fulfilled an objective and served a purpose, although perhaps many of those involved hide it on the bottom shelf of their filmography.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews