Unknown White Male
Wellspring Media | Release Date: February 24, 2006
3.9
USER SCORE
Generally unfavorable reviews based on 14 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
4
Mixed:
2
Negative:
8
Watch Now
Buy on
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
2
[Anonymous]Mar 12, 2006
Even if it wasn't a hoax, it felt like reality TV at its most hokey.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BenJ.Oct 1, 2006
While the film was well constructed -- it was very much presented as if the subjects case of amnesia were authentic; briefly mentioning false cases exist without exploring the possibility in this instance. Case-in-point: the subject could While the film was well constructed -- it was very much presented as if the subjects case of amnesia were authentic; briefly mentioning false cases exist without exploring the possibility in this instance. Case-in-point: the subject could not recall people, places, or the taste of any food -- re-learning what a strawberry was in one scene. Interestingly, the ability to speak, read, write, etc. are all intact. Hmmmmm.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DanK.Sep 7, 2006
While many of the criticisms of this film and Doug Bruce have some merit, for example, Murray
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RitaL.Sep 5, 2006
A compelling documentary. The interviews were fascinating but the director often failed to elicit interesting follow throughs. The filler footage was often rather pointless, with shots of plastic bags on the street and the like. The bottom A compelling documentary. The interviews were fascinating but the director often failed to elicit interesting follow throughs. The filler footage was often rather pointless, with shots of plastic bags on the street and the like. The bottom line is that this was extraordinary documentary material in the hands of a filmmaker with only average filmmaking skills. Nonetheless, some of it is strongly emotional. Cut down to 60 minutes, it could be much stronger.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AlexFeb 23, 2006
Unconvincing, in the extreme.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
HerbertA.May 15, 2007
Pretty fake in my opinion because he forgets some cute concepts( the taste of chocolate) and yet retains the understanding of some very complex concepts, such as governing, value of money, friendship and so on.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
MorriBeyMay 7, 2011
Nah. Whilst it has an excellent story the reluctance of the person to be involved in the project lets the entire documentary down. This can be seen by how the director tries to fills the void with 'vanilla sky' time lapse sequences but withNah. Whilst it has an excellent story the reluctance of the person to be involved in the project lets the entire documentary down. This can be seen by how the director tries to fills the void with 'vanilla sky' time lapse sequences but with an reluctant and somewhat boring subject matter. it fails to pass as a documentary worthy of even a final film student.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

65 Critic Reviews

3.9 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL