Underworld: Evolution
Screen Gems | Release Date: January 20, 2006
8.4
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 642 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
528
Mixed:
60
Negative:
54
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
1
TomD.Jan 28, 2006
A million more render bars couldn't save this baby from the dingos [although count on the inevitable third film to include even more top dollar 720° camera moves]. If you're way into myspace-style goth, love dystopian mist over A million more render bars couldn't save this baby from the dingos [although count on the inevitable third film to include even more top dollar 720° camera moves]. If you're way into myspace-style goth, love dystopian mist over dark 'somewhere in Europe' landscapes and you have a sweet tooth for brainless visual stimulation, this may be the dog whistle you've been saving your ears for.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
ThomasI.Jan 29, 2006
I made a mistake. I went in trusting the user reviews on this site when I should have have known that they exist only to berate critics that know what they're talking about. I haven't made such an error since "Mission to Mars" six I made a mistake. I went in trusting the user reviews on this site when I should have have known that they exist only to berate critics that know what they're talking about. I haven't made such an error since "Mission to Mars" six years ago, and I was humiliated beyond reason then. Stupid 15 year old goth kids and their bleak, bloody, Blade / Matrix clone junk.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
AlecB.Jun 13, 2006
This is got to be the worst piece of crap in movie history.i mean come on i couldve took my video camera to my basement and filmed a better movie than this crap.the first of the series was great so i thought that this was going to be good This is got to be the worst piece of crap in movie history.i mean come on i couldve took my video camera to my basement and filmed a better movie than this crap.the first of the series was great so i thought that this was going to be good but boy was i wrong.if it wasnt for all of the voilence i wouldve gave this crap a zero.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JayK.Jan 21, 2009
I'll give it a 1 because i like the color. other than that its just blood and guts with ridiculous storyline and characters. underworld 1 is much much better.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
ChrisW.Jun 24, 2006
What the hell was that? I enjoyed the first one because it was very unique, but this one... boring! I'm only giving it a 1 because Kate is smokin' in that outfit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JasonY.Jan 30, 2006
Anyone who sees this movie should be prepared to feel just a little taken advantage of after all is said and done. Clearly it's intended for lower life forms. Although, I think even plankton or jellyfish would be bored slimeless by this Anyone who sees this movie should be prepared to feel just a little taken advantage of after all is said and done. Clearly it's intended for lower life forms. Although, I think even plankton or jellyfish would be bored slimeless by this pathetic tour de farce. They manage to make Kate Beckinsale in tight leather depressing for God's sake!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
[Anonymous] Feb 17, 2006
This sequel makes even less sense than the mediocre and boring first movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
MarcDJan 22, 2006
Another waste of time from Beckinsale. First Underworld...then Van Helsing...and now...this mess.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
ChelseaD.Jan 30, 2006
Did everyone who rated this movie so far have something to do with it or something? Even for popcorn movie bull, this movie was god awful. The first one was at least fairly decent, but I can't believe I wasted my money on this crap.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
CarlosFJul 18, 2009
Nothing new. Nothing better than the first one. Just Marcus character, but he's overacting. The lead actors are the same dumbs, Beckinsale and Speedman, who haven't much to say, but a lot to over act. The music is the same from the Nothing new. Nothing better than the first one. Just Marcus character, but he's overacting. The lead actors are the same dumbs, Beckinsale and Speedman, who haven't much to say, but a lot to over act. The music is the same from the first movie, the plot is even worse and more derivative than the first one. It's basically action scenes, which were too predictable, and CGI creatures, which were completely unreal (I mean, what the f--- were that werewolves?). So, this a boring overlong movie. And it's a ZERO.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
MottJan 22, 2006
The movie is about a 2 or 3, but I am giving it a zero because its stupid people that go to these movies and rate it 8s and 10s that make someone in hollywood make worse sequels off of already terrible movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
next
Page:
More From This Movie

36 Critic Reviews

8.4 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 71 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL