Underworld: Evolution
Screen Gems | Release Date: January 20, 2006
8.4
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 642 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
528
Mixed:
60
Negative:
54
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
4
grandpajoe6191Oct 1, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "Underworld: Evolution" is just annoying. Why are the vampires and Lycans just fighting consistently? No plot twists, witty script, or even chilly scares. It's a movie you'll get to watch and forget in a few moments.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
DavidM.Jan 21, 2006
Another mediocre entry into the ever growing modern vampire movie list. Like all of its counterparts it strives to bring something "new and cool" to the genre but ends up reheating the same leftovers and becomes indistinguishable from the Another mediocre entry into the ever growing modern vampire movie list. Like all of its counterparts it strives to bring something "new and cool" to the genre but ends up reheating the same leftovers and becomes indistinguishable from the likes of Blade(1, 2, and 3) and Bloodrayne. If you enjoy seeing the same story but with marginally updated effects, this is the movie for you. If you want original and engaging cinema, look away and hope they don… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
RyanD.Jan 21, 2006
There were far too many flash backs in this movie to maintain any fluidity. There were also far too many errors, Lycans and Vampires went from being almost impossible to kill, to being as fragile as mortals. And worst of all the two original There were far too many flash backs in this movie to maintain any fluidity. There were also far too many errors, Lycans and Vampires went from being almost impossible to kill, to being as fragile as mortals. And worst of all the two original brothers were killed with any of the myths holding true.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JGJan 21, 2006
It was o.k. There was long sex scene. I thought it would have meaning to the film i.e. baby hybrid or something. No nothing at all. The brother feud was weak storyline at best. Michael was supposed to get weaker because lack of blood but It was o.k. There was long sex scene. I thought it would have meaning to the film i.e. baby hybrid or something. No nothing at all. The brother feud was weak storyline at best. Michael was supposed to get weaker because lack of blood but Selene gives him a few drops here and there he is a stallion. This was almost a complete waste of film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
ValerieL.Mar 21, 2006
Lots of chances, to tell an interesting dark Vampire story...but lots of blood, a long love-scene and too long fight-scenes do not compensate the worse and confusing story. Just another bad Vampire B-movie. What a waste of time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
PatC.Aug 27, 2007
From a plot standpoint, unengaging to the point of inducing naptime. Despite the colorless light, some pretty precise special effects work. The two romantic scenes between Kate & Scott where actually quite tasteful, with good music and no From a plot standpoint, unengaging to the point of inducing naptime. Despite the colorless light, some pretty precise special effects work. The two romantic scenes between Kate & Scott where actually quite tasteful, with good music and no dialogue. Could have fooled me, but it was almost like the two of them had some kind of chemistry going.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
GusJan 21, 2006
If you're not a fan of the genre and walk in with modest expectations, you will not be disappointed. the action, dialogue, and bouncing around is all according to type, with zero innovation and mild excitement. while the writing isIf you're not a fan of the genre and walk in with modest expectations, you will not be disappointed. the action, dialogue, and bouncing around is all according to type, with zero innovation and mild excitement. while the writing is formulaic and the plot forgettable, the film is finely paced and rather kinetic. it moves speedily along. the acting is decent for the genre. one or two of the supporting players stand out above the otherwise banal proceedings. the director and the editor deserve the only superlatives for setting the film's smooth rhythm.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
ChrissyFeb 11, 2006
Im somewhat surprised at how high the users have rated this movie. Although it most likely will greatly appeal to certain groups of people. It definately has an immature flavor to it. Not unlike the first movie, it makes little sense when Im somewhat surprised at how high the users have rated this movie. Although it most likely will greatly appeal to certain groups of people. It definately has an immature flavor to it. Not unlike the first movie, it makes little sense when you watch it. Not one of the worst movies of the year, but hardly worth the money. Definately find a better movie to go see.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
ERG1008Aug 23, 2010
More vampires vs werewolves nonsense but this time the big, top, head cheese vampire is back & he's annoyed & trying to find his brother.
Much better than the first in that the story is a lot stronger, the effects are more convincing & lessMore vampires vs werewolves nonsense but this time the big, top, head cheese vampire is back & he's annoyed & trying to find his brother.
Much better than the first in that the story is a lot stronger, the effects are more convincing & less pouting from Kate Beckinsale.
One or two silly moments but the opening scene is very good indeed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
imthenoobNov 9, 2012
Plot is much better this time around, Don't see how it's confusing at all unless you haven't seen the first film. Acting is a little better due to lack of secondary characters. Once again, Special Effects suck. I hate how they switch fromPlot is much better this time around, Don't see how it's confusing at all unless you haven't seen the first film. Acting is a little better due to lack of secondary characters. Once again, Special Effects suck. I hate how they switch from werewolf costume to cgi, It's so annoying. The film would have been much better if all of them were guys in CGI suit (like Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes). I also hate how the hybrid Michael looks in this film. It's pretty much just him with black paint on. I expected the hybrid Vampire/Werewolf to have a good, original look but sadly he doesn't. Action was rather weak as well. Overall, while it's improved in some areas (the plot), It's also gone down in other areas (the action) as well. I have given it a chance but I am done with this series. I honestly do not see how users can actually like this trash.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
CineAutoctonoDec 25, 2015
I have never seen the whole saga "Underworld" but if it is not disgust this is the unca I saw but wrong cost was very boring , as will be worth the crude scenes and uncensored , but it will be worth watching the saga "Underworld".
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
timoneJun 12, 2018
Okay, so after the first Underworld which I unexpectedly not a fan of however I finally did watch the sequel Underworld: Evolution making sure I find it to be good than the first and, no. I didn't find it to be as good but yet not a bad filmOkay, so after the first Underworld which I unexpectedly not a fan of however I finally did watch the sequel Underworld: Evolution making sure I find it to be good than the first and, no. I didn't find it to be as good but yet not a bad film per say but I expect far more from this. Underworld: Evolution follows after Underworld previously where Selene fights werewolves and now in Evolution, she has to go and fight Markus Corvinus to protect the future from his hidden past. And he remember the flashbacks by stabbing and biting someone. Yeah I know Selene does the same thing. Okay, not the stabbing. Did I forget to mention that Underworld is the same thing as Resident Evil? No, I haven't. Other than that, I can't remember a thing about Underworld: Evolution apart from the constant werewolf fights and they're not as enjoyable but what can I say? It's for the fans. As much I find the first Underworld to be just okay, this one is mediocre but still all right but I wasn't a fan like I said. Will I watch it again? I don't know. I might have the same reaction if I did decided to watch it again. However I'm glad I've watched the first one twice and this one once. But if you do like Underworld: Evolution like the first one then this is probably for you and the fan base. Pop it in and judge for yourself.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
alexandreaNov 26, 2021
Yhea there´s a lot of missed oppurtonities in this movie. It could have been so much more.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

36 Critic Reviews

8.4 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL