Summit Distribution | Release Date: November 21, 2008
4.9
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 1091 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
416
Mixed:
226
Negative:
449
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
AlexandraT.Nov 24, 2008
Great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
GearoidMNov 24, 2008
From around half way through onwards people were laughing. I wasn't sure if it was a comedy or not. That's 2 hours of my life I won't get back, unfortunately. The acting was poor and it was sooo slow. My wife enjoyed it -From around half way through onwards people were laughing. I wasn't sure if it was a comedy or not. That's 2 hours of my life I won't get back, unfortunately. The acting was poor and it was sooo slow. My wife enjoyed it - mostly because she spent the entire movie drooling over the lead actor. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
adrianavNov 24, 2008
this movie was verry porly made, the acting was not the best, the makeup looked obviously way overdone. it looked like a low budget film. the setting was not belevable. I beleve that the director does not demand more of the actors, becausethis movie was verry porly made, the acting was not the best, the makeup looked obviously way overdone. it looked like a low budget film. the setting was not belevable. I beleve that the director does not demand more of the actors, because when you have a demanding director you can get the worst actors to look like the best. the story draged on too long, and felt boring, the vampires acted way too depressing, and sure a little depresing is okay but they way over did it. in one ocassin I saw the main character who is not suposed to be in derect sunlight ouside in a cloud free sunny day,their is no way that this group of teenagers could have gone to a normal school without raising some crazy suspicions. alot of girls went to see the movie, but it was the book that made them go. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
CarinNov 24, 2008
I loved this book, but I went into the movie with low expectations because of the previews.
Alas, it didn't even live up to those low expectations. This really is the worst movie I have ever seen. Now I haven't seen Plan 9 from
I loved this book, but I went into the movie with low expectations because of the previews.
Alas, it didn't even live up to those low expectations. This really is the worst movie I have ever seen. Now I haven't seen Plan 9 from Outer Space, so it may not be the worst movie ever made, but it's pretty close.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
PrestonMelbourne-WeaverNov 24, 2008
The acting was not that great. The lead actress, whom i usually enjoy to watch on screen, seem constipated every time she was overcome with emotions. Pretty boy Cedric just looked solemn the whole time, as if he went to the Nick Cage schoolThe acting was not that great. The lead actress, whom i usually enjoy to watch on screen, seem constipated every time she was overcome with emotions. Pretty boy Cedric just looked solemn the whole time, as if he went to the Nick Cage school of acting. Plus, i don't know if it was the director of the cinematographer, but they did WAY too many circular shots. Yet, i still found myself entertained throughout the movie, sometimes for the wrong reasons, sometimes for the right ones. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
LouE.Nov 24, 2008
Bram Stoker must be turniing in his grave!!!!!!!
But I know I'm not the intended audience, I never read t he book, I'm not a tween, I'm a guy and I have a brain, it might as well been brought to us by Disney. All in all just a
Bram Stoker must be turniing in his grave!!!!!!!
But I know I'm not the intended audience, I never read t he book, I'm not a tween, I'm a guy and I have a brain, it might as well been brought to us by Disney. All in all just a buch of pretty white kids pretending to act. totally messed up the Vampire genre
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
AllisonGawareckiNov 24, 2008
Just like the rest of the girls in America, I was sucked into the cult of Stephanie Meyer. I read all the borrowed books and even bought Break Dawn. I fully enjoyed the series for what it was: fluff. The problem with some people's viewJust like the rest of the girls in America, I was sucked into the cult of Stephanie Meyer. I read all the borrowed books and even bought Break Dawn. I fully enjoyed the series for what it was: fluff. The problem with some people's view on the film is that they are going to see it expecting gold, or on the other end of the spectrum, crap. This movie fully lived up to my expectations and actually a little higher. Yes I know many people think that Pattinson was miscast and Stewart was "too pretty" for the role of Bella but who cares? Their line delivery was fantastic. Even one of my straight male friends was laughing out loud at points. I will agree however that if you didn't read the book(s) you didn't get the full (for lack of a better word) "experience" of the movie. But that doesn't mean it deserves a 2 out of 10 rating. You don't go to Disaster Movie expecting to be floored by their original jokes and Oscar worthy acting do you? Then don't go into Twilight expecting to see Cohen film and you won't be disappointed. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MoniqueCantwellNov 24, 2008
Omg, Twlight was Amazing =] !
Ive never read the books but my sisters have and they said the movie&th e book are very similiar.
Twlight was amazing, the guy that plays in Harry Potter he was incridibly HAWT! I was very fascinated with the
Omg, Twlight was Amazing =] !
Ive never read the books but my sisters have and they said the movie&th e book are very similiar.
Twlight was amazing, the guy that plays in Harry Potter he was incridibly HAWT! I was very fascinated with the movie, i plan on going to see the movie again this weekend because it was soo good. A few of my friends saw the movie and they were also very fascinated with the movie. Im telling you the seris of the movies are going to be wonderful and im looking forward to seeing it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
KenzieP.Nov 23, 2008
Ok so I knew it wasnt going to be like the book but im mean come one they took for ever to get to where they dieside to be together then flew pass everything for the rest of the movie. Hello for a mive such as twilight people are willing toOk so I knew it wasnt going to be like the book but im mean come one they took for ever to get to where they dieside to be together then flew pass everything for the rest of the movie. Hello for a mive such as twilight people are willing to sit a watch longer so make it good (look at harry potter) they missed important information that needs to be in the movie. No offence butt really the girl that played bella pissed me off the whole movie. everyone eles did great but she sucked at being Bella. So i liked it to a point ! i just cant think of the book when i watch it!!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
jenniferjohnNov 23, 2008
I'm a big fan of the books. However, the movie did not satisfy me. Harry Potter was great and the Lord of the Rings amazing. What happened with this movie? Well, some of the supporting actors were stiff, the cinematography was awesomeI'm a big fan of the books. However, the movie did not satisfy me. Harry Potter was great and the Lord of the Rings amazing. What happened with this movie? Well, some of the supporting actors were stiff, the cinematography was awesome and I loved the music, but the screenplay was the killer. The screenplay did not adequately build the romance nor the suspense and left me wanting so I read the book for a fourth time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
KylBNov 23, 2008
They did an excellent job capturing the book in this movie. at no point did i find myself wanting to scream at the screen "no way! that isn't supposed to happen" like with some of the harry potter movies. i agree they totally suck at theThey did an excellent job capturing the book in this movie. at no point did i find myself wanting to scream at the screen "no way! that isn't supposed to happen" like with some of the harry potter movies. i agree they totally suck at the speed effects, having them run fast could have been done (and has been done before) so much better. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
DanielleGNov 23, 2008
Over all the movie was ok but it could have been a lot better. i didnt think the actors were that good and the movie was too funny. i didnt really see the whole love at first sight going on. the skipped too many parts and didnt build theOver all the movie was ok but it could have been a lot better. i didnt think the actors were that good and the movie was too funny. i didnt really see the whole love at first sight going on. the skipped too many parts and didnt build the whole relationship with edward and bella that well. also they needed to introduce the cullen family more. alice plays such a huge part in the next book. AND they didnt put the 'do i dazzle you' line in the movie. which was a big line me and my friends were assuming would be a must. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
AgnesNov 23, 2008
A High School Play has better acting than this. Make that a Middle School ! The audience was actually laughing at how stupid this was. Save your hard earned money to buy a new book. Let's see a vampire that is out in daylight,A High School Play has better acting than this. Make that a Middle School ! The audience was actually laughing at how stupid this was. Save your hard earned money to buy a new book. Let's see a vampire that is out in daylight, doesn't bite his victims, and looks in the mirror. And to think we all thought that Dracula was the exact opposite. Live and Learn! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
RyanNov 23, 2008
I've read the entire Twilight series, and I have to say that the movie is terrible. That isn't to say the books are any better, but this is just atrocious. All I can say is: you know something is wrong when your audience is laughingI've read the entire Twilight series, and I have to say that the movie is terrible. That isn't to say the books are any better, but this is just atrocious. All I can say is: you know something is wrong when your audience is laughing in a gothic vampire romance movie. Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful
0
ConnorNov 22, 2008
Absolute garbage...

It's nearly impossible to relate to ANY of the main characters, they screwed up the entire vampire concept, and the female lead is dumb as a sack of bricks. Not only that, but their relationship did nothing for me.
Absolute garbage...

It's nearly impossible to relate to ANY of the main characters, they screwed up the entire vampire concept, and the female lead is dumb as a sack of bricks. Not only that, but their relationship did nothing for me.

Don't get me wrong, I'm normally a sucker for this kind of thing, but this movie just left me with a feeling of disgust.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JuanPabloGonzalezNov 22, 2008
If you like romantic vampire stories such as classic Coppola's 1992 Bram Stoker Dracula masterpiece movie then you are going to love this contemporary vampire film by all means, every minute of this 120min film will keep you glued to theIf you like romantic vampire stories such as classic Coppola's 1992 Bram Stoker Dracula masterpiece movie then you are going to love this contemporary vampire film by all means, every minute of this 120min film will keep you glued to the big screen.
To put it simple since Coppola's Bram Stoker Dracula film I have never seen any vampire movie as good as Twilight.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
2
KellyNelsonNov 22, 2008
I have read the book 3 times, and was very disappointed, most of the actors didn't fit the charaters, the acting was mostly bad, imporant info was left out which I think will make the next movies difficult, worthless things wereI have read the book 3 times, and was very disappointed, most of the actors didn't fit the charaters, the acting was mostly bad, imporant info was left out which I think will make the next movies difficult, worthless things were added...not impressed. They relied to much on teeny-boppers looking for eye candy and not enough on the actual story which could have been an amazing movie if they had stuck to the book. Didn't appear the screen writer had read the other books since items that become very important in the next book were left out, rushed through, or changed dramatically. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CMNov 22, 2008
I was pleasantly surprised. I'm a 33 year old woman who loved the book, but director Catherine Hardwicke gave the movie an edge I wasn't expecting but found refreshing. It didn't pander to those who wanted something glossyI was pleasantly surprised. I'm a 33 year old woman who loved the book, but director Catherine Hardwicke gave the movie an edge I wasn't expecting but found refreshing. It didn't pander to those who wanted something glossy with cgi effects. The story wasn't about the action anyway, it was about the relationship. Loved it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LindseyHNov 22, 2008
I did love this movie. At the very beginning I was positive I was going to hate it because it was so different from the book, but once we meet Edward almost everything is great. Edward kind of acted like a creeper in the beginning, the way heI did love this movie. At the very beginning I was positive I was going to hate it because it was so different from the book, but once we meet Edward almost everything is great. Edward kind of acted like a creeper in the beginning, the way he scolded Bella for tripping and the way he just walked away after blaming his eye color change on the "flourescents". And the girl who plays Alice is perfect for Alice. Like seriously.
You may want to read the book first, because parts were a little confusing to my friend who didn't read the books, but this was a great movie.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JoeSkotzkyNov 22, 2008
Overall, it was fairly good. If you read the book, there were some parts missing others added in, and some things that left you going "Wait, what?" If you didn't read the book, it was a good movie. I find it strange how the vampiresOverall, it was fairly good. If you read the book, there were some parts missing others added in, and some things that left you going "Wait, what?" If you didn't read the book, it was a good movie. I find it strange how the vampires don't burn in sunlight, or when they're near a cross. They can see their reflections too. The jumping around looked very wired, as it was too straight and incredibly unnatural (we're talking about vampires here). There was absolutely no reason why this couldn't be PG. The "one scene of sensuality" is where Bella dn Edward kiss on a bed, and the fighting is overall a rather big "meh". The acting was mediocre; no standouts there. Pretty much a good movie, but there is room for imporvement. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
fhalloNov 22, 2008
People tell either it's the best movie ever made, others say it's one of the worst. And for those ones who hate it usually tell me they'd rather watch 'Eragaon', (that crappy book adaptation of the excellentPeople tell either it's the best movie ever made, others say it's one of the worst. And for those ones who hate it usually tell me they'd rather watch 'Eragaon', (that crappy book adaptation of the excellent bestseller). I thought that was a joke. I was laughing up to the point of seeing Twilight Saturday afternoon with my friends. IT"S AWFUL! Don't see it! Don't waste your time or money on it, I am going to regret seeing this for the rest of my life. yes, it is AMAZINGY OVERRATED! And so bad, and 2 times worse than Eragon. Believe me, if you plan on seeing this, if your a fan, plan on walking out in tears, for those who don't care, you will have a grudge against Twilight forever. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
AnonymousMCNov 22, 2008
The acting was stilted at best. There was no basis for the attraction between the main characters. Besides, how can you fall in love with your food? Also, why would someone who is 108 years old go back to high school? The vampires inThe acting was stilted at best. There was no basis for the attraction between the main characters. Besides, how can you fall in love with your food? Also, why would someone who is 108 years old go back to high school? The vampires in Underworld, a parallel movie concept, were much better thought out. And yes I watched the movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
MelissaM.Nov 22, 2008
I am a HUGE fan of the Twilight series and I was so very disappointed at how the movie turned out. The acting wasn't that great. The chemistry between Edward and Bella was definitely not there. The way their love for each other isI am a HUGE fan of the Twilight series and I was so very disappointed at how the movie turned out. The acting wasn't that great. The chemistry between Edward and Bella was definitely not there. The way their love for each other is written in the books I felt was not shown at all in the movie. Key points from the book were missing. Like Carlisle's story of how he became a vampire for example I felt was very important and I was upset when that wasn't seen in the movie. The extra scenes with James, Victoria and Laurent killing people were not necessary since it Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ShelleyN.Nov 22, 2008
I have read all 4 of the books and though i expected this movie to be a huge let dow, because after all, its hard to live up to the book, it did suprisingly well. The acting has some flaws from time to time but the movie overall was I have read all 4 of the books and though i expected this movie to be a huge let dow, because after all, its hard to live up to the book, it did suprisingly well. The acting has some flaws from time to time but the movie overall was amaziing! I think its great because anyone can watch it and fall in love with the story even if they haven't read the book. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BrazR.Nov 22, 2008
This movie surpassed Stephanie Meyer's vision of the intensive Love and devotion of the two main characters. I was enthralled by directors results in bringing this to life. I LOVED IT, LOVED IT AND LOVED IT AGAIN. From an 63 year old This movie surpassed Stephanie Meyer's vision of the intensive Love and devotion of the two main characters. I was enthralled by directors results in bringing this to life. I LOVED IT, LOVED IT AND LOVED IT AGAIN. From an 63 year old lady who enjoys romance in her life still!!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
JoeNov 22, 2008
Terrible acting... people in the theatre were laughing at the acting.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CatieDNov 22, 2008
This movie was amazing. Although some parts were quite different from the actual film, it kept you watching. It interested you enough to want to keep watching. It was awesome.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
PaulaD.Nov 22, 2008
The movie will probably satisfy fans, but will not do much to attract those who have not yet read the book.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MNov 22, 2008
Probably just for 15 y.o. girls. Very TV movie-esque with the acting, filming, long thoughtful stares, even the special effects. Hopefully will improve as the movies progress.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JillDNov 22, 2008
Twilight was excellent. I saw it yesterday and plan to go again. The movie it quite different from the book and as a movie I think it is a must see. However, I don
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NelleneR.Nov 22, 2008
Twilight is spectacular .. although it has its downs, and i know every movie adaptation is not hat same as the book .. twilight goes for high!! sure thing, it's in the box office although there are negative reviews .. We love it!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
RoseW.Nov 22, 2008
The movie did exactly what Vampires do, suck. The only reason it made as much money as it did is because of their millions of loyal fans who have read the book plus the girls who have swooned over Pattinson since his appearance in Harry The movie did exactly what Vampires do, suck. The only reason it made as much money as it did is because of their millions of loyal fans who have read the book plus the girls who have swooned over Pattinson since his appearance in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Overall, the film is funny, though unintentional, and has ruined the idea and fear people have had for vampires for many generations of young tween girls. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ChristianVNov 21, 2008
This movie is cool, cant really complain, i havent read the book yet.. hahaha... but i will.. is a cool movie.. my girl liked it too.. haha, well, more than me.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
MikeR.Nov 21, 2008
It seemed half the audience in the theater had already read the book and had already made up their minds--the rest of us came to mock it. Between the awful score, makeup, special effects, dialogue and (the worst of all) directing, there was It seemed half the audience in the theater had already read the book and had already made up their minds--the rest of us came to mock it. Between the awful score, makeup, special effects, dialogue and (the worst of all) directing, there was no shortage of opportunities to laugh out loud (and everyone did) during what I assume should have been dramatic sequences. Maybe this will appeal to die-hard fans of the book, but certainly not anyone who appreciates any kind of coherent cinematography or character depth. I can say with a high degree of certainty that we won't see another movie this bad for a very long time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
[Anonymous]Nov 21, 2008
Twilight was a very fast paced movie comparing it with the book. The movie should have been longer since fans were hoping for an exact or close to exact replica of the book. If the scenes were longer then it wouldn't seem like a longer Twilight was a very fast paced movie comparing it with the book. The movie should have been longer since fans were hoping for an exact or close to exact replica of the book. If the scenes were longer then it wouldn't seem like a longer version of a preview. What was great about the movie were the actors and how they took they're rolls with perfection. I am a big fan of all things twilight. Thank you. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ArianaNov 21, 2008
I read the book seris and i thought it was good but not excelent, but i really thought this was a good movie. I think it apeals more to girls and people who have read the book, but i do know some guys that saw the movie and said it was I read the book seris and i thought it was good but not excelent, but i really thought this was a good movie. I think it apeals more to girls and people who have read the book, but i do know some guys that saw the movie and said it was really good. So i do recomend. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JimC.Nov 21, 2008
A beautiful love-story ! Good performance for Kirsten Stewart & Robert Pattinson ... Compliments at Hardwicke, great director !
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
KatieNov 21, 2008
It was just amazing! The romance in this movie was beautiful!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
CarlyN.Nov 21, 2008
I went with 9 of my friends to see the movie and none of us liked it. We came knowing it would be different from the book but didn't think it'd be that bad. The acting skills of the actors weren't that good, the music I went with 9 of my friends to see the movie and none of us liked it. We came knowing it would be different from the book but didn't think it'd be that bad. The acting skills of the actors weren't that good, the music didn't fit the scenes, they mixed scenes from the book together....overall it was a big disappointment. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
7
AngelinaM.Nov 21, 2008
Like most movies made from books it dint follow the whole story line wich was dissapointing- they also really needed a bigger budget to bring the special effects more into play- otherwise I loved it simply because its "Twilight" the book Like most movies made from books it dint follow the whole story line wich was dissapointing- they also really needed a bigger budget to bring the special effects more into play- otherwise I loved it simply because its "Twilight" the book moved me emotionally so the movie helped me see more visually- I have great hopes for the next movie to blow our socks off! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
claap567toyouNov 21, 2008
It has way too many little Vampire flaws, but at least it hist its target audience, but to me, I thought that there were so many flaws that I just think I should steady out the reviews because here I go. Twilight is the worst movie Ive ever It has way too many little Vampire flaws, but at least it hist its target audience, but to me, I thought that there were so many flaws that I just think I should steady out the reviews because here I go. Twilight is the worst movie Ive ever seen! Sometimes chick-flicks are fun (like Juno), or there just sappy or unrealistically cheesy, This turns out not to be a chick-flick, but everyone seems serious, the romance, the characters. Lame. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BillbillyNov 21, 2008
I give it a 2 because at least it had all of the characters and the adaptation was somehwat accurate. I was extremely dissapointed with Twilight. I've read all the books, and this ones the best. But believe me, it is even worse than I give it a 2 because at least it had all of the characters and the adaptation was somehwat accurate. I was extremely dissapointed with Twilight. I've read all the books, and this ones the best. But believe me, it is even worse than "Eragon"! You might think that's a joke, it ain't. This is probably the boringest movie I have ever seen. It felt like poor-quality entertainment all the way through. Like everything is in there, but it would have been nice if they'd try to entertain us, then make a daring epic. Twilight isn't a daring epic!!!!! It's a chick Flick!!! For gods sakes how can they get that wrong? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
GeorgeC.Nov 21, 2008
I'm not kidding, its like the worstest movie of the year by far. It is so pale, dull and boring. Nothing exciting ever happens. It is emotionless, and you just can't wait for it to end. And the visual effects, they were awful! But I'm not kidding, its like the worstest movie of the year by far. It is so pale, dull and boring. Nothing exciting ever happens. It is emotionless, and you just can't wait for it to end. And the visual effects, they were awful! But most of all, why would you make a movie adapted from the lamest hit chick flick novel out there. And the story: Booooo. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful
10
HannahL.Nov 21, 2008
Robert pattinson is the perfect edward cullen. I couldn't have asked for a better interpretation of the movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
DrakeR.Nov 21, 2008
Crapy book. Crappy movie. Plot is cliched and boring. Save your money and see something decent.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JordanF.Nov 21, 2008
Unexpectedly good.I think the caasting could've been a little better but overall a solid flick for just about anyone.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
SandiH.Nov 21, 2008
I love the books. The movie was close to it. THE DIRECTOR AND MUSIC STUNK! she made it seem like a complete acid trip, the cinematography was all over the place and crude....and there was never a point in which the music ever STOPPED. or I love the books. The movie was close to it. THE DIRECTOR AND MUSIC STUNK! she made it seem like a complete acid trip, the cinematography was all over the place and crude....and there was never a point in which the music ever STOPPED. or matched the actual scene. and there was an actual montage. and a quote form the Lion King. (yes, really) his sparkling was weak. over all, the director had no idea what the hell she was doing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful