Paramount Pictures | Release Date: June 27, 2014
4.5
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 1158 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
328
Mixed:
335
Negative:
495
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
Kostas_SpirouDec 29, 2021
Damn the action in this movie is so good, the new transformers are great and there are many cool set-pieces. Unfortunately though, there's a lot of wasted potential, specifically the first half, it takes a while for it to get decent.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
HabibiehakimApr 18, 2023
I'm still surprise on how much i really really like Age Of Extinction, once you got a good engaging story, a good fun characters, and a superb not boring action sequence, it works!, i found Mark Wahlberg character as a refreshing replacementI'm still surprise on how much i really really like Age Of Extinction, once you got a good engaging story, a good fun characters, and a superb not boring action sequence, it works!, i found Mark Wahlberg character as a refreshing replacement of Shia LaBeouf, and the fact is Wahlberg is a better actor, i also like Nicola Peltz and Jack Reynor characters, and Stanley Tucci was just great when he plays goofy, there is no long boring moment in this movie and it's a nearly 3 hour movie, no boring action compare to the awful Revenge Of The Fallen, every action was exciting and superbly execute, the villain was great, it's a nearly 3 hour movie which yes some people found it unnecessary, but i know it's gonna be a long movie so i just follow everything and i'm completely fine with it, i also personally think Age Of Extinction not gonna be one of those film that i will rewatch too because of the obvious runtime reason, but as one timer watch i would like to remember Age Of Extinction as the best Transformers movie i've watch so far not only in terms of entertainment but as a movie itself too, i really really like it, it's badass, it's epic, it's great. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
liamexeFeb 9, 2023
The first half of the film moved me deeply, and I felt a variety of emotions, including "Michael Bay should have developed qualified Transformers," "Michael Bay should have famous sequences," and "too much adrenaline emission." But as soon asThe first half of the film moved me deeply, and I felt a variety of emotions, including "Michael Bay should have developed qualified Transformers," "Michael Bay should have famous sequences," and "too much adrenaline emission." But as soon as the battleground shifted to Hong Kong, chaos and strict editing set in along with unknown dialogue and rapid brand implantation! not only had an impact on the plot, but also made me feel disgusted. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
The_D4RknesSJul 28, 2022
the critics get very heavy with these movies I don't know why because they are all great from 2007 to 2017 none are bad
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MrPajamasMay 28, 2022
I found it boring from beginning to end. I didn't find it interesting. The plot wasn't much for me. The absence of Shia LaBeouf and Megan Fox also brought the film down rapidly for me. The action was good, but it didn't hold a candle to theI found it boring from beginning to end. I didn't find it interesting. The plot wasn't much for me. The absence of Shia LaBeouf and Megan Fox also brought the film down rapidly for me. The action was good, but it didn't hold a candle to the previous installment, which was really phenomenal as far as action scenes go. The soundtrack was also significantly weaker compared to the previous films. For me, an absolute waste. I think they should have just kept the first part and not made it a series, and if they did, they should have ended it with a third part. For me, this was a mediocre film that I don't recommend. Only to the really big fans of the saga. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
realjaytheboomMar 9, 2022
Transformers Age of Extinction: 4 movie in and 3 have been really good but this, this is my favorite. The people from the first 3 gone we got a new cast. First Mark Wahlberg I hear so many people **** on him but I really like his character heTransformers Age of Extinction: 4 movie in and 3 have been really good but this, this is my favorite. The people from the first 3 gone we got a new cast. First Mark Wahlberg I hear so many people **** on him but I really like his character he is a dad that is protective for his daughter. The other is the hot girl, other hot male actor and the comic relief in the form of TJ Miller. Again cinematography great all the camera angles are awesome but the real highlight is the CGI touch ups. From the explosions to the Transformers them self’s look awesome. Once again The Transformers are the standout Prime and Bumblebee still kicking ass but we got new ones my new favorite Hound voiced by John Goodman he is really cool I don’t know why but I really like him from either the guns or just the line delivery, Drift is the samurai dude he’s cool I guess and the other one he’s good too. My friend would kill me if I didn’t mentioned the Dinobots. So Grimlock is the only one that matters he’s the T-Rex and yeah he’s ducking sweet the stuff he and Prime do make for one hell of a team up. Watch this one there is more action in this movie then the other ones it’s available on Hulu now. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
gracjanskiFeb 11, 2022
On the one side this part feels fresh, because there are new actors, characters and the focus is also Hong Kong instead of USA only. The visual effects are great as usual. There is also not much humour in opposite to the 2nd part and I likeOn the one side this part feels fresh, because there are new actors, characters and the focus is also Hong Kong instead of USA only. The visual effects are great as usual. There is also not much humour in opposite to the 2nd part and I like that, Transformers should be more serious in my opinion
But the characters are boring again, the story is just ok and superficial. Michael Bay dont know how to tell stories, only how to destroy things. So yes, the movie is too long.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021
----------------------------------5.0/10-----------------------------------
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
Kostas101Oct 18, 2021
Damn the action in this movie is so good, the new transformers are great and I love Lockdown! Unfortunately though, there's a lot of wasted potential, I think some characters needed more screentime, and there are some very stupid moments...Damn the action in this movie is so good, the new transformers are great and I love Lockdown! Unfortunately though, there's a lot of wasted potential, I think some characters needed more screentime, and there are some very stupid moments...

In the end I just wanted Lockdown to kill everyone, but sadly that didn't happen.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
DiscussionaqueoNov 17, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. One of my favourite transformers movies. It does a lot of things right that the other films get wrong. Most of the transformers are shown to have actual characters, instead of just being walking car advertisements. Drift, Crosshairs and Hound all have fleshed out characters, and get plenty of screen time, unlike the secondary Autobots in previous films. Likewise, Lockdown is one of my favourite villains from the franchise.
Unlike the previous films, I really like the humour of this film. There aren't any scenes that are so cringe I want to skip through them. Likewise, I really prefer Cade Yeager to Sam Witwicky. Shia LaBeouf was just awkward to watch.
I guess my only criticism of the film is that the stakes are quite low. Like if Galvatron got the seed, it wasn't like the world would end. He'd destroy Hong Kong and have a new army, which is where we were at half way through DOTM.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Luandino232Nov 7, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. O filme e ruim a única coisa que se salva ,eos dinobots eo lockdown ,O galvatron tem um cgi horroroso,os protagonistas são aqueles que você não se importa, resumindo é um filme de 2 horas de lançaria de robôs com roteiro fraquíssimo Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
FloroNov 3, 2021
Can't figure out if Age Of Extinction is better or worse than The Last Knight. The plot makes no sense and is boring as hell. And for a movie with the word "Transformers" in the name, it focuses on the humans way too much.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
KelvinSelimorNov 1, 2021
Transformers: Age of Extinction. A real attraction for the eyes. Michael Bay outdid himself and the fourth film came off in full. More than two hours of explosions and shots, and all this accompanied by cool music. New Autobots, many newTransformers: Age of Extinction. A real attraction for the eyes. Michael Bay outdid himself and the fourth film came off in full. More than two hours of explosions and shots, and all this accompanied by cool music. New Autobots, many new enemies that are stronger than the Discepticons and all this is Michael Bay. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
pur__0_0__Aug 8, 2021
Looking at the poster and trailer of this movie I was thinking this might be something really good. I had recently watched the first three movies of this franchise and I really liked the whole concept of Transformers; just seeing them doLooking at the poster and trailer of this movie I was thinking this might be something really good. I had recently watched the first three movies of this franchise and I really liked the whole concept of Transformers; just seeing them do something on the big screen is enough to get my attention. So when I heard that this is the worst movie of the franchise, the robot dinosaur poster refused to let me believe that. How can a movie with such a good CGI possibly be bad? And when I watched it... I now apologise to all those people I didn't trust. I'm really sorry.
The problem with this movie is that it has humans. I know, Transformers are all about Autobots and humans interacting and coming together to beat Decepticons, but the humans in this movie are terrible. I forgave Dark of the Moon since it was Sam Witwicky, the same guy we had previously seen in two prequels. But this time, it's the new guy. I don't even remember his name, so let's just call him Mark Wahlberg. Mark is such a two dimensional character. He loves mechanical engineering and hates anyone approaching his daughter. Yes, that's his entire personality.
So when Optimus Prime ends up coming to his lab, they bond together. The premise of this movie is all wrong. The Autobots are now considered criminal in this world because of the destruction that happened in the previous movie. Like, what? Dude, even the army was doing destruction in the previous movie if that's supposed to be a real reason. Also everyone saw the Autobots fight the Decepticons in the epic climax moment. And it's not like there's some communication gap between the Autobots and the humans, since Optimus Prime literally lived with the military. So if there's any problem at all, they can just talk about it.
So anyway Optimus helps Mark, his daughter and her boyfriend escape from there, and they team up with Hound and some other Transformers (I don't even remember the names at this point, because they don't give a reason to do so). Together they go to The Lost World where Optimus fights the robot T-Rex for which I watched this movie in the first place. First of all, the T-Rex is like, five times bigger than Optimus Prime. For comparison, just try fighting an elephant with your bare hands (except that elephants are herbivores and won't attack you unprovoked). And after the beating that T-Rex becomes friends with Optimus because it's a Michael Bay movie.
So then there's the epic showdown battle between Mark and some bad guys. I was doing my college project on my laptop and this movie was running on my phone's Prime Video, so I used to only look at the movie whenever something interesting would be happening, otherwise I'd just keep doing my work. I don't think I looked at the screen more than 3-4 times throughout the work. This is the reason why I can guarantee you that it's a boring movie. I don't remember most of it.
Transformers: Age of Extinction is the movie that taught me that Transformers could be bad too. Earlier I used to see Screen Rant articles which said that after a time the movies went repetitive with the CGI fighting and explosions, so I didn't understand what's bad about it since that's literally what I watch them for. But it turns out the reason why I hate it is the other way round. The big, cool robots have now turned into parodies of themselves and the humans are no longer even close to being interesting. I'd say if you haven't begun watching this franchise, just watch the first three and then jump straight to Bumblebee. That would save a lot of time and inner peace.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
anaadigiriAug 3, 2021
With plenty of deaths and dangers, this film takes on a more somber tone. But, in true Transformers fashion, it has its share of hilarious moments. It has great action sequences, heartwarming and truly epic moments, as well as some fresh newWith plenty of deaths and dangers, this film takes on a more somber tone. But, in true Transformers fashion, it has its share of hilarious moments. It has great action sequences, heartwarming and truly epic moments, as well as some fresh new faces. No matter how much I shall miss the old, like much in this movie, times change, just like much in this movie. I like how they started exploring the history in this film, I feel like it adds to the story. I also like the new characters, they feel realistic. There is the father and new protagonist, Cade Yeager, who is trying to support his family, his daughter who is worried about both her father and her future, as well as having some fun, and her fun carefree man, who can be just as serious. The new Transformers are fun as well, whether it be the snarky Crosshairs, the serious Drift, or the violence loving Hound. This movie is a new start, and a good one at that. It, like the others, is underappreciated. I adore this film, and I hope that others will appreciate it as much as I do, as it is a masterpiece of its own type. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
tanhoangbaoJul 24, 2021
Would have been the worst thing I have ever since. How could you turn a masterpiece "Transformer 2007" to a sh**house? ffs
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DunyGMar 15, 2021
Yeah, I liked it. I know it wasn't too appealing to most of you but I liked it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
TRANSFORMERSFANMar 11, 2021
this movie is one of my favorite and best movies of 2014 next to big hero 6! all michael bay transformers movies are part of my childhood!
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
Flori19Feb 12, 2021
I like Age of Extinction's new characters and the new character redesigns. I like the new story of Cade Yeager with the transformers. In over-all I like this movie.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
0
wtfamiwatchingJan 25, 2021
Good thing we can watch these online cus I couldn't see myself sitting down for almost 3 hours to watch something this boring. I feel i'd need to have my brain cut in half to enjoy whatever this movie is trying display
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
CRoger013Dec 28, 2020
Oh my god! I absolutely hate this movie! It’s my 2nd worst transformers movie ever! It’s so horrible! I like all the characters except the villains! The first transformers movie and bumblebee (2018) is better
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Efe10Dec 8, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. çok güzel bir film 15 kere izledim.kötü puan almasını anlamıyprum efsane ötesi bir film Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
MahmusSep 30, 2020
An absolute mess of a movie full of unbearably unlikeable characters, embarrasing product placement, horrible performances and even some oddly subpar effects.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
JKGamer76Sep 13, 2020
Not bad for those who watch with an open mind. The plot is complex but well explained, and comes out of the "most of the same" of all transformers films.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
GoofyGiggles23Sep 8, 2020
One of the best movies I have ever seen. Michael Bay subverted everyone's expectations and made a completely unique movie. Great dialogue, amazing acting, great science, great story.

Review by - Eshaan Tolani
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
KhareAug 30, 2020
Absolute trash of a movie , I hated pretty much everything about it , the story was messy and was really hard to get hold of transition and time gap between dark of the moon and age of extinction was huge and bay really failed to explainAbsolute trash of a movie , I hated pretty much everything about it , the story was messy and was really hard to get hold of transition and time gap between dark of the moon and age of extinction was huge and bay really failed to explain what happened in that time period properly in simple words it's just bad Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Mrman69Jul 27, 2020
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Legit_LeeJun 11, 2020
this movie made me **** cum out of my ass, it tasted really spicy and salty.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SoulstoneMar 19, 2020
While critics have valid points about why they think the movie isn't good, I found myself having a good time with it. Yes, the 165-minute run-time is unnecessary and brings the movie down some points for me, but the Transformers are just soWhile critics have valid points about why they think the movie isn't good, I found myself having a good time with it. Yes, the 165-minute run-time is unnecessary and brings the movie down some points for me, but the Transformers are just so awesome in these movies that it makes it hard to completely hate them (except for the Last Knight). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
JPKNov 26, 2019
Could Do Worse
Age Of Extinction does have it's pros with a unique new cast of Autobots (Loved John Goodman as Hound), Lockdown was f*cking awesome, Wahlberg, Tucci, and Grammer all did well, and some fun action. Unfortunately, Age Of
Could Do Worse
Age Of Extinction does have it's pros with a unique new cast of Autobots (Loved John Goodman as Hound), Lockdown was f*cking awesome, Wahlberg, Tucci, and Grammer all did well, and some fun action. Unfortunately, Age Of Extinction also has a lot of flaws such as a badly written script, 50% of the humor is not very funny, Some of the visuals are iffy, and the humans are pretty bland.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
Deanfm123456789Jul 30, 2019
Terrible, Just Terrible, Worst of the Transformers Movies, and one of the Worst Movies Ever Made, Transformers: Dark of the Moon is the Best of the Transformers Movies, But this is Really the worst out of the Bunch, Transformers: The LastTerrible, Just Terrible, Worst of the Transformers Movies, and one of the Worst Movies Ever Made, Transformers: Dark of the Moon is the Best of the Transformers Movies, But this is Really the worst out of the Bunch, Transformers: The Last Knight is Also Bad. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SerchvazJul 2, 2019
This transformers movie has a bad plot, unlike his predecessors, this one fails to tell a history, the plot is so bad that they also forgot details sold in the first 3.
It feels like a bad soft reboot.A popcorn movie to see only one time. The
This transformers movie has a bad plot, unlike his predecessors, this one fails to tell a history, the plot is so bad that they also forgot details sold in the first 3.
It feels like a bad soft reboot.A popcorn movie to see only one time. The only thing that saves this movie is the Dinobots scenes, the rest is just a mess of action sequences with a bad writing.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
TronmegaMay 21, 2019
Too long, too much plot holes.

The only decent things from this movie were the action, lockdown and dinobots.

Overall, this movie is totally not a good movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TyranianApr 14, 2019
This is more like it really, totally nuts action and the humans take a big demotion. This is what Transformers should be.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
TiagoSantosSApr 9, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Pela segunda vez, anunciado como o "Ultimo Transformers". não vou comentar nada sobre isso, a pergunta e : Pedimos outro transformers ? Nao. mas....eles nos enviaram mesmo assim. Sopoiler:

O optimus chama de honra marta o inimigo distraído. a filha de cage, não sabe fazer nada alem de ser resgatada e falar besteiras. tipico filme adolescente, cheio de explosões e diálogos bem fracos. bom, pelo ao menos os gráficos esta lindos.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
YunusKatMar 29, 2019
They tried they really did. But it fell short in my opinion. The story felt like it was just another cliché one and just Bay trying to make up for sloppy writing with his usual dose of over the top action scenes. Bad Bay.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
GedankenschmiedMar 12, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Als Kinoliebhaber ist es ein sehr schweres Unterfangen die Filme der "Transformers"-Reihe zu schauen, da diese eine Handlung aufweisen, welche auf einen Bierdeckel passt und dennoch sich in vielen Punkten widerspricht und/oder keine wirkliche Logik aufweist.
Doch fälle ich kein Urteil ohne besagte Filme gesehen zu haben und so kam es, dass ich nun den vierten Teil nachholte.
Auch wenn ich versuchte ganz unvoreingenommen an den Film zu gehen machte es einem "Age of Extinction" schon in den ersten Minuten fast unmöglich nicht abzuschalten.

Die ersten Wortwechsel sind ein Graus und die "slapstick"-Einlage mit dem Football schmolz meine Synapsen. Nicht das ich per se die Szene nicht lustig finden könnte, doch die fehlende Fähigkeit eine schauspielerische Leistung an den Tag zu legen vernichtete jede Glaubwürdigkeit. Selbst meine ungeborenen Tochter hätte den Ball besser/schlechter werfen können. Was wir als Zuschauer geboten bekommen ist dann ein Mann, welcher einen schlechten Wurf darstellen soll, dennoch zu minderbemittelt ist und somit nur in der Lage ist den Ball sich direkt vor die Füße zu werfen. Solch einen schlechten Wurf würde ich nicht mal einer Person ohne Arme zutrauen.

Nun bleibt es aber leider nicht nur bei einer kleinen und unbedeutenden Szene, sondern die Idiotie des Filmes steigert sich ins Undenkbare.
Der Film versucht dem Zuschauer ernsthaft zu vermitteln, dass die CIA ohne Wissen und Zustimmung des Präsidenten ein totalitärer Apparat mit eigener Agenda sein kann, welcher sogar ohne rechtliche Absicherung und Erlaubnis handelt und seine Ziele, sowie die Verfolgung einer bestimmten Gruppe durchführt.
Noch unzählige Szenen und Dialoge könnten in der Luft zerrissen werden, da diese in ihrer Qualität nicht ein mal mehr im "Trash"-Genre anzusiedeln wären, doch dies wäre verschenkte Liebesmüh.

Dennoch darf man nicht die Arbeit komplett als Schandfleck bezeichnen, da es auch genug Personen gab, welche bei der Umsetzung des Filmes ihr Bestes gegeben haben und nur ihrer Arbeit nachgegangen sind. Kostümdesigner, Animatoren, Ausstatter usw. sollten von der Schande befreit sein, welche der Regisseur (Michael Bay) und der Drehbuchautor (Ehren Kruger) über die Branche der Filmindustrie abermals brachten.

Wer auf Explosionen steht wird mit "Age of Extinction" bestens bedient sein, da einem schon nach wenigen Minuten das Gehirn implodiert.
So kann ich abschließend noch was gutes loswerden:
„Danke, ich muss diesen Film nie wieder schauen."
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
PauloReviewsMar 7, 2019
"Transformers: Age of Extinction" isn't just a really bad movie. It's the worst movie I've ever seen. Seriously, godawful movies like "Batman and Robin" and "The Room" are painful to watch, but they are at least 1 hour and a half long. This"Transformers: Age of Extinction" isn't just a really bad movie. It's the worst movie I've ever seen. Seriously, godawful movies like "Batman and Robin" and "The Room" are painful to watch, but they are at least 1 hour and a half long. This movie was an excruciating 3-hour experience, filled with terrible acting performances, nonsensical plot points, incomprehensible action sequences and VERY SLOW pacing.

Michael Bay doesn't have a clue how to direct a movie, much less an action movie. It's sad.

If you haven't seen the movie, congratulations. You just skipped three hours of anguish.

0/10.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Huhan12345Jan 10, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The number of goofs and bugs can cause dense phobia. The editing was in a terrible mess. The first 50 minutes were so boring. A lot of action scenes, like the scripts in this film, are foolish, stupid and clumsy. I don't hate the implants of advertisements in such movies, but I hope it will be a little bit less. After all, it still has some influence on watching the film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Logan12345Jan 10, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Too long! Advertising has also been sold to such a desperate extent! Construction Bank, Amway Nutrilite, Jiannanchun, Yilishuhua Milk, Yibao Mineral Water, Hanggen... Counting, I fell asleep... Could advertisers give people some space to watch real movies? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018
This feels totally disconnected from the first three movies with no mention of Witwicky and Oct Prime has a new best buddy that should care for him for like zero reasoning. I just don't buy it really the characters the plot. Cash grab anybody?
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DominArsenDec 8, 2018
Transformers : l'âge de l'extinction
Un film de Michael Bay se qui veut dire BOMBE, EXPLOSION .... à GOGO !!!
Surement le meilleur Transformeurs qu'on est vu jusqu’ici avec un nouveau casting, une technologie de pointe, l'intégration des
Transformers : l'âge de l'extinction
Un film de Michael Bay se qui veut dire BOMBE, EXPLOSION .... à GOGO !!!
Surement le meilleur Transformeurs qu'on est vu jusqu’ici avec un nouveau casting, une technologie de pointe, l'intégration des Dinobots, une bande sonore maîtrisée et étourdissante, une bonne OST de Steve Jablonsky avec en plus quelque musique du groupe "Imagine Dragon" et des scènes étourdissantes à foison.
Bref un mixte de bonne chose pour 2H45min de pures rigolades.
Je rajouterai une seule chose : Des scènes d'action très diversifier comparer au précédent film.
Mais un scénario qui ne tient que sur un post-it mais plus complet que les précédent
Si vous aimé tout casser, tout péter, détruire, les tôles froissées, et la beauté visuelle vous ne serrer pas déçus du voyage pour cette explosion de sensation.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
swajnugNov 23, 2018
I had created an account just to express my disgust with this trash. The plot is acceptable only by a teenager with especially low standards, both as a whole and separate scenes it just obscenely stupid and incoherent. One-liners are clicheI had created an account just to express my disgust with this trash. The plot is acceptable only by a teenager with especially low standards, both as a whole and separate scenes it just obscenely stupid and incoherent. One-liners are cliche in a way that resembles a parody rather than a blockbuster. It looks like a student project aiming to show CGI skills with worthless characters, so ungodly stupid that you actually wonder if they are not mentally impaired by design. Both main characters and power lust government workers share the same illogical insanity. It is the worst high budget production I have seen in my life, appalling beyond any measure. Even must-have hot girl character is repeatedly under 18 which leads to cringe dialogs. Unbeleviable piece of trash. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
bimmybob2001Oct 20, 2018
I found this film watchable enough despite the Problems it has, like Nicole Peltz, (who sucks like she did in "The Last Airbender") but overall, it was a fun time. I liked it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
ErikTheCriticSep 30, 2018
This film is incoherent, filled with unrealistic explosions and loud noises, and does not have anything new to offer from the previous "Transformers" trilogy.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
LivingTribunalMay 19, 2018
I will not take this as a part of transformers. Completely failed in everything, but still better than The Last Knight.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
spacebear1Dec 21, 2017
Transformers: Age of Extinction is a film that honestly doesn't quite live up to the previous film. Its nowhere near as bad as the second film. I thought the story was a mess and the characters aren't that great. I liked the CGI and soundTransformers: Age of Extinction is a film that honestly doesn't quite live up to the previous film. Its nowhere near as bad as the second film. I thought the story was a mess and the characters aren't that great. I liked the CGI and sound design and some of the humor was pretty funny but in the end, this is a minor disappointment. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
MoviesR_OKOct 22, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Literally one of the worst movies of all time. Action is the only thing this movie has going for. If you want characters you empathize with, a decent plot, and correct geographical depictions, this is the movie to avoid. Hong Kong does not just border onto forest. Mark Wahlberg should just stick to comedy as this may be his most unconvincing performance yet. What a waste of my time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Bugger217Sep 4, 2017
Transformers: Age of Extinction takes the worst elements of the previous installments in the franchise, then cranks the awful up to 11. A dull, cut-and-paste story with atrocious dialogue and terrible performances make this an absolute slogTransformers: Age of Extinction takes the worst elements of the previous installments in the franchise, then cranks the awful up to 11. A dull, cut-and-paste story with atrocious dialogue and terrible performances make this an absolute slog to sit through. Worst of all, the action actually manages to be pretty boring. It doesn't feel like Michael Bay was having any fun constructing the set pieces this time. Yet, the movie is somehow almost three hours long. As someone who found a fair amount of enjoyment in the first few movies, this was a massive letdown. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
RyanTheN3RDJul 23, 2017
This is literally the worst movie I've ever seen and whoever gave it a 10 should have their Metacritic account taken away. The visuals aren't bad, but at the fourth Transformers movie it's nothing new or exciting so it isn't a selling point.This is literally the worst movie I've ever seen and whoever gave it a 10 should have their Metacritic account taken away. The visuals aren't bad, but at the fourth Transformers movie it's nothing new or exciting so it isn't a selling point. The movie sabotages anything good it has, TJ Miller is good for the small amount he's in but is underused. To fully express my dislike for this movie, there's a scene in which the daughter's boyfriend has to explain why it is legal for them to date, and there's a lot of reasons it's creepy. First, whoever wrote it knows about this law and I don't want to ask why. Second, Michael Bay wrote a sexy character so young they had to explain why it's legal, but they don't have to explain why it's gross. Dinobots are in like 10 minutes, humor sucks, directing sucks, writing sucks, acting is good 10% of the time. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
asijfhwrwerJul 1, 2017
this is movie is absolute piece of **** **** it's just a transformer but with a chinese patriotism seriously i hate this movie so much i don't have to say again
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
Jgo77Jun 8, 2017
Terrible terrible movie. The acting was awful, the product placements made you feel like you were watching a commercial. The movie was too long. Too much action and no plot whatsoever.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
snakeordeathJun 6, 2017
10 out of 10...MASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTERPIECE
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
CineAutoctonoDec 24, 2015
"Transformers : Age of Extinction" was a very, very dull movie , Porel script and taking other roles, but leave in the first place of the worldwide box office in 2014 , it was not very convincing to me.
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
2
FuturedirectorMar 11, 2016
This new sequel to Bay's Transformers' saga offers another impressive show visual effects, but they're not enough to save this picture from a fatally cliched storytelling, characters, and a somehow disappointing result.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
3
Thatonenerd2187Jan 20, 2017
Transformers once again suffers thanks to Micheal bays formula with possibly the worst one, age of extinction. There are a couple of things to praise about it. New character designs for Optimus prime and bumblebee look fantastic, and theTransformers once again suffers thanks to Micheal bays formula with possibly the worst one, age of extinction. There are a couple of things to praise about it. New character designs for Optimus prime and bumblebee look fantastic, and the soundtrack is pretty solid. Everything else fails spectacularly, even the action. The action itself is pretty bad, especially since it's poorly shot. I can hardly tell whats going on, and it's hard to care about the characters since nothing interesting is going on. The story in this movie is poorly written and has the same problems with the other installments. It has poorly written characters who are so generic it's just pathetic. The humor in this movie is just as bad as the other two movies, which is no surprise, and the dialogue is so bad, no actor could pull this off. Plus this movie 3 HOURS LONG, it's so boring watching it was a drag. Once again, Bay just doesn't care about the project, and will continue to make these movies until he overfills his bank account. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
otakudbzOct 19, 2016
Action and CGI-wise, this movie is amazing. Now, story-wise, what the ****

Everyone knows the Transformers movies suck. That's no big deal at the moment.
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
6
AngusBarbudezSep 14, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Michael Bay,juró y perjuró que Transformers: el lado oscuro de la luna, sería el final de Transformers, (para él) y que se centraría en nuevos proyectos, peeeeero se ve que a los productores y sobretodo a Hasbro, como que eso de cerrar una saga que les genera millones y millones en merchandising, películas, series.... PUES VA A SER QUE NO. Y por supuesto, contratan de nuevo a Michael Bay o mejor dicho fuerzan, a que la dirija porque lo estipula en su contrato, Bay con desgana la dirige.

Transformers la era de la extinción, nos sitúa 5 años después de lo sucedido en la tercera parte, Los transformers son proscritos y cazados por el gobierno, por un siniestro agente de la CIA encarnado por Frasier Kelsey Grammer, que esta compinchado con un empresario que quiere crear sus propios transformers y forrarse con ello blablabla. Mientras un ingeniero y padre soltero (Mark Whalberg) encuentra un camión viejo y roñoso que parece ser... Optimus Prime. Y a partir de ese momento, es perseguido por los malos.

Orci y Strutzman ya no están en el guión, se encargó de su escritura a Ehren Kruger, Spielberg tampoco es el productor, ni Dreamworks esta detrás, el reparto de la trilogía anterior ni está, ni se les menciona. Paramount ha dado puerta a todos los implicados en la saga anterior, salvo a Bay.

Algo que destacaba las pelis de Transformers, es que siempre contentaba al espectador medio que quería un blockbuster para pasar el rato, sin olvidarse de los fans, dándole guiños, tramas y personajes basadas en la serie, cómics etc. En esta ocasión hay una serie de libertades, que bueno, son aceptables como los Dinobots que son Dioses antiguos, Lockdown no es decepticon en el film, sino un cazarrecompensas y la nula aparición de Decepticons. El resultado del film en general, es una historia menos infantil, menos humor chorra, desaparece los personajes odiosos y repelentes, algo que se agradece, viendo los antecedentes, Michael Bay en la dirección, pues le tenemos "menos" centrado en sus excesos (explosiones a tutiplen y gratuitas, banderas y 360 con atardeceres) y mas en el film, demostrándonos que para dirigir blockbusters de acción, es el boss.

El reparto, debo decir que se come con patatas a todos lo mamarrachos de la anterior, el personaje de Mark Whalberg , es un personaje que mola, no es cargante ni insoportable y hace algo mas que el señor bolsa de papel, la hija y el novio de esta, no están para rellenar y los malos son clichés con patas, tampoco se le puede pedir mas a un film de este tipo.

Peeeero, no todo el monte es orégano, la película tiene una serie de lastres, bastante molestos, que pueden perjudicar en el disfrute de este :

-La película es extremadamente larga, dura casi 3 horas, tiene demasiadas subtramas, han intentado contar tantas cosas, para que parezca mas sería, que se la toman en serio, y han cometido un gran error, convertir un blokbuster veraniego en un sopor de 3 horas.

-Debido a la larga duración de la película, como consecuencia aparecen demasiadas subtramas, que muchas de ellas, no pintan un carajo, o las desarrollan bastante mal, como por ejemplo la de Galvatron, que te preguntas...¿Hacía falta meterle? o los Dinobots que solo aparecen al final PORQUE SI.

En conclusión, un blockbuster veraniego decente, que por culpa de las mil subtramas que meten hacen que sea un disparate exageradamente largo, una puta manía de ahora, de hacer pelis que duren tanto, que yo creo que en 90 minutos tenias para contar la historia de sobra. Eso si, los Haters de este señor se van a cebar de lo lindo.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
SanDiego94Jun 29, 2016
Worst movie ever, everybody hates it because of the scene where a guy gets fried by a grenade and Optimus Prime doesn't care! Don't let everybody watch it!
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
2
diamondskullJun 27, 2016
An insult to what Dino-bots are, they know how to talk and would never let anyone ride them not even Optimus. And also a destruction of the original Galvatron that should have not been created by humans, we aren´t that advanced, there is justAn insult to what Dino-bots are, they know how to talk and would never let anyone ride them not even Optimus. And also a destruction of the original Galvatron that should have not been created by humans, we aren´t that advanced, there is just a big plot hole in here... Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
gameguardian21Jun 7, 2016
Why does bay keep raping peoples childhoods with these terrible movies. If you have seen the other transformers movies, its the exact same thing, with more explosions that bay would @#%* to, more racism, and more jokes that make adam sandlersWhy does bay keep raping peoples childhoods with these terrible movies. If you have seen the other transformers movies, its the exact same thing, with more explosions that bay would @#%* to, more racism, and more jokes that make adam sandlers look good by comparrision. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
MrMovieBuffMay 15, 2016
Michael Bay is a director who doesn't know when to stop. Every single time one of his movies gets bashed by critics and audiences, he carries on making his movies, I'm not sure if that's an inspiration, or just that's plain ignoring everyoneMichael Bay is a director who doesn't know when to stop. Every single time one of his movies gets bashed by critics and audiences, he carries on making his movies, I'm not sure if that's an inspiration, or just that's plain ignoring everyone who is offering constructive criticism.

I did not have high hopes for 'Transformers: Age of Extinction' simply because after having sat through three of his other films, what could be so different about this one? Yes, it has a new cast, but new actors doesn't always improve a franchise, as long as the people behind the scenes remain unchanged, then you're getting the same product with some cool looking features.

Mark Wahlberg replaces the noisy Shia LaBeouf as Cade Yeager, a single father who lives in Texas with his daughter, Tessa (Nicola Peltz). He claims himself to be an inventor, often collecting old scraps of metal, and taking them into his barn outside his house, and trying to create something innovative. He comes across a Transformer in the form of a van and tries to fix it. The Transformer, of course, is Optimus Prime (voiced by Peter Cullen) and after having his life saved by Cade, Optimus promises to protect the Yeager family.

Kelsey Grammer is the main antagonist here, he believes that all of the Autobots are evil ever since the events that occurred in Chicago (check 'Transformers: Dark of the Moon'), and wants to wipe out all of the Autobots. We also meet a man named Joshua Joyce (Stanley Tucci), the head of KSI who develops his own line of Transforming technology.

It seems that the plot needs to be put on hold for the sake of trying to focus on the Yeager family drama, as it seems that Cade's daughter, who is 17, is dating a 20 year old Shane Dyson (Jack Reynor). Obviously, any person will know that it is unacceptable for a man in his 20s to be dating someone under the age of 18, but there is one scene that actually lets the two love-birds explain why it is acceptable for the 20 year old and 17 year old to be dating. Shane even goes as far as to present Cade an official card which is basically saying that they are allowed to do some "naughty stuff", just because they have a card saying they could do so.

Michael Bay is known for trying to objectify women as much as he can (remember, he cast an underwear model who is not an actress in the previous installment), here, even though Peltz may have been age appropriate to appear the way she did in this, the fact that her character is under-age is just nothing more than a new low for the director. I apologize if it seems like I am going off-topic about the film's main plot, but clearly the film itself went off-topic hoping we wouldn't notice...but we did.

The action is your typical, slow-motion, low-angle, people running away from explosions and cars flipping over on a motorway style. There is nothing new, or different that makes this movie stand out from the previous installments, except that it's even more intolerable than before. Time and time again, my attention just wandered because this film is not very good at holding my interest, it is devoid of any intelligence or gripping moments.

The characters are nothing more than archetypes...the hero is your typical hero, the villain is your typical government official villain, the young blonde girl is your typical, attractive, damsel getting herself into distress.

This proves once again, that Michael Bay is a hack, cynical filmmaker, there seems to be a lack of focus and innovation in his skill as a filmmaker. He is better off directing more of those "Victoria's Secret" commercials, which is actually highlighted in this film. The product placement here is very in-your-face. Clearly to Bay, subtlety is overrated, everything has to have some form of exaggeration in case it wasn't clear to any of us.

The run time, which is at roughly 2h 40m...is way too long to keep us entertained, one minute of this film feels like 5 minutes. You just want it to end, but Bay is clearly not sick of this roller-coaster ride which stopped being fun ages ago.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
Dual2AMay 14, 2016
With all the hype surrounding this film, all I cant say, I'm a bit disappointed.
Good Things
Lockdown is a badass. Optimus Prime kicks ass. Cade Yeager, the human cast I care. Bad Things Galvatron is **** What Michael Bay usually does
With all the hype surrounding this film, all I cant say, I'm a bit disappointed.
Good Things
Lockdown is a badass.
Optimus Prime kicks ass.
Cade Yeager, the human cast I care.
Bad Things
Galvatron is ****
What Michael Bay usually does in other films.
Transfomations look ****
One **** up story, loose plot.
well, explosions
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
TuhiCriticMar 18, 2016
I am a movie fanatic, not a typical critic. So I as an audience would rate the movie quite good although I did miss the clear story line of the first part. But when you are watching sequels of a movie series, you need to understand that thereI am a movie fanatic, not a typical critic. So I as an audience would rate the movie quite good although I did miss the clear story line of the first part. But when you are watching sequels of a movie series, you need to understand that there will be changes. So rather than comparing it with its previous parts, it is better to view it as a separate movie. Yes! One do need to maintain the connection between all its parts and Age of Extinction does that. It is clear that after Sentinel Prime tried to rebuild Cybertron with his portal, there was outrage, and the hostility against the Transformers are well understood.
I guess common movie fanatics like me didn't like it because half of the Autobots were wiped out and Ratchet's encounter was surely painful. I did not miss Sam though. I mean I did miss him but it was mostly because of Bumblebee. But we have evil Lockdown and rebuilding of Galvatron was totally cool.

The only disappointing thing for me in this part was merging up of plots. I found it pretty hard to keep up with everything. In the previous series, there was Colonel Lennox, Sam and Transformers but this part seems to have the story all mixed up. First, a robotic engineer finds Optimus, then there is CIA, then there is Lockdown trying to capture Optimus. Oh and not to forget, we have the KSI and its chief running away with the seed. Well, wise people rightly say that too many cooks spoil the broth. That's what happened in Transformers 4, too much story spoiled the movie.
Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
6
futurespielbergMar 7, 2016
I would say this is one of the worst Michael Bay film. I mean I have to say the truth I actually like some of Bays films, I loved the Rock, I really liked both Bad Boys, Armagedon was not that great but still enjoyable, and the firstI would say this is one of the worst Michael Bay film. I mean I have to say the truth I actually like some of Bays films, I loved the Rock, I really liked both Bad Boys, Armagedon was not that great but still enjoyable, and the first Transformers was really fun I even liked Pain and Gain. This one is not on the list, This movie is pretty dumb, the dialouge is pretty cheesy and some of the acting is not good at all. I will say Mark Wahleberg did pretty well in the movie, I actually liked him more then Shia Lebouf , Stanley Tucci was hilarious and mad the movie more fun. Kellsy Grammar was the best actor in the whole movie and he played a pretty good villian, and I even like Titus Welliver as James Savoy the supporting villain along side Kellsy Grammar. That's all was good about the movie, I mean some of the action in the end is okay but its still not a great movie. I mean the Visual effects and set pieces are still cool but, in the end its just another explosion filled Michael Bay Film that may entertain audience members, but for me not really. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
4
nahtan1244Feb 13, 2016
While better than 2 and 3 It's nowhere near as good as 1. Now let me start off by saying I like to give movies chances Sometimes movies can redeem themseves after a couple of misfires and transformers 4 in some cases does that. For exampleWhile better than 2 and 3 It's nowhere near as good as 1. Now let me start off by saying I like to give movies chances Sometimes movies can redeem themseves after a couple of misfires and transformers 4 in some cases does that. For example the addition of lock down was fantastic. They should have gone with making him the main villain. It would have made the movie so much better. However transformers age of extinction is a predictable mess from start to finish. I have officially given up on Michel bay. Why can't he just go back to the formula that made transformers 1 so good. oh well i guess good things come and go. Anyway this movie besides Lockdown was a mess. Galvatron was a cool idea but not well executed and none of the human characters were interesting. Peter Cullen always gives his all to optimus prime but not so much this time. Plus the way he gets injured comes back to life gets injured and prevails has become so redundant I guarantee that's how there going to flesh out his character in the next movie. Yea you heard me right a transformers 5!. Oh boy Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
2
EpicLadySpongeJan 16, 2016
It's too long and boring for a guy who's been in the theaters expecting this to be over. As for the Transformers, the age of extinction should've just came out fast so no one would see this movie anyways.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
1
FilmMasterEdJan 6, 2016
Michael Bay has often said how he loves to "blow things up real good." Well, if that's his desire in life, there's little doubt that he tops himself in Transformers: Age of Extinction. This is as excruciating a movie as is likely to beMichael Bay has often said how he loves to "blow things up real good." Well, if that's his desire in life, there's little doubt that he tops himself in Transformers: Age of Extinction. This is as excruciating a movie as is likely to be experienced by anyone, anywhere. It isn't merely that the story is insulting, the characters are bland, the action is dull, and the CGI is everywhere - it's that all this goes on for nearly three hours. That's three hours of your life you'll never get back.

Bay's argument is that the Transformers movies are made for the little kid in all of us. That might be true, assuming the kid is pugnacious, antisocial, afflicted with an attention span approaching zero, and lacking in anything remotely resembling a creative impulse. My inner child often delights in silly, loud, or otherwise unsophisticated films. Parts of Godzilla gave me chills. Misgivings aside, I'm looking forward to the next Star Wars. And, despite its recent precipitous nosedive, I still adore Doctor Who. But that inner child quails at the thought of enduring even one more minute of a Transformers movie. The only thing more epic about this film than its running length is its soullessness.

Bay keeps saying he's done with the Transformers franchise but it draws him back like flies to **** This time around, the human actors from the earlier films have been jettisoned. At first glance, that might seem like a good thing until one realizes that people in Bay films are as interesting and important as background décor. It's really all about the robots, the orgiastic display of CGI destruction, and (of course) the explosions. I wish I could say "just sit back and enjoy the ride", but there's a reason roller coasters are only a few minutes long.

Is there a story here? It's not War and Peace but there's something that might be mistaken for the skeleton of a plot if viewed in dim light. For those who care about continuity, events in Transformers: Age of Extinction take place five years after those of the previous film, Transformers: Dark of the Moon. By this time, the Transformers have been virtually eliminated from Earth as a result of a ruthless cleansing scheme spearheaded by CIA Black Ops hotshot Harold Attinger (Kelsey Grammer in full Stinky Pete mode). Attinger has help from a Decepticon called "Lockdown" (voice of Mark Ryan), who has come to Earth in search of Optimus Prime (voice of Peter Cullen). The CIA bad guy has also formed an alliance with billionaire inventor Joshua Joyce (Stanley Tucci), who has figured out how to build Transformers. His pilot project is something he calls "Galvatron" (voice of Frank Welker) - a robot that looks an awful like the dreaded (and supposedly dead) Megatron.

In the acting department, Mark Wahlberg is an upgrade on Shia Labeouf, although it hardly matters. Walhberg does his job and stands around looking suitably awed, angry, or frightened, depending on what the script requires. Somehow, Stanley Tucci manages to rise above the material and leave an impression. It helps that he's used partially for comedic relief and gets to utter the best one-liner (one that uses up the movie's PG-13 single "f-word" allowance). Tucci's success is counterbalanced by Nicola Peltz's failure. The Transformers movies have had their share of annoying characters but none (not even the one played by Megan Fox) has achieved the apex occupied by Peltz's Tessa, who one-ups the worst horror movie heroine in terms of incompetence, ignorance, and irritation factor. On more than one occasion, I was actively rooting for a robot to stomp on her or for her to fall from a great height and make a satisfying splat. I guess this could be considered a step forward for Bay - he made me feel something about a human being in a Transformers film.

In the end, there's a sense that nothing much happens in Transformers: Age of Extinction, although that "nothing" is long, loud, and flashy. Bay's approach, which is technically proficient but without charm or life, bludgeons viewers into a near-catatonic state. If one takes a step back and looks at Transformers: Age of Extinction from a distance, the story isn't confusing but, while watching it, the sense of chaos is almost overwhelming. Shakespeare didn't know it, but when he wrote of "sound and fury signifying nothing," he could have been describing this franchise.

This is blockbuster moviemaking at its worst - a product so cynical that it doesn't try to pretend it's anything more than a mindless spectacle. It's endless, tiresome, and tedious, but it will make so much money that Transformers 5 is a foregone conclusion. I can't think of a more compelling reason to hate Transformers: Age of Extinction.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
Animationlover2Jan 3, 2016
Not the Best Transformers Movie really Bay you had to had to put alot of Marketing stuff, American Flags and Most thing that gives me a headache is the Explosions. Sone of the stuff were good but the rest garbage
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
McgillacuddyDec 23, 2015
Pretty much the only good thing we get out of this film is that Shia Labeouf isn't in it. Other than that, all you get are the usual Michael Bay elements: corny jokes and mindless mayhem.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
FlickFreaks83Dec 11, 2015
He promised it would be shorter. He lied. Michael Bay’s fourth Transformers film clocks in at a bum-numbing 165 minutes, making it longer even than the patience-trying Dark Of The Moon. The juggernaut success of the franchise presumably givesHe promised it would be shorter. He lied. Michael Bay’s fourth Transformers film clocks in at a bum-numbing 165 minutes, making it longer even than the patience-trying Dark Of The Moon. The juggernaut success of the franchise presumably gives Bay carte blanche to do what the hell he wants at this point. Disappointingly he’s simply opted for another baggily plotted, cacophonous three-hour migraine.

Picking up four years after the costly Battle Of Chicago, Age Of Extinction ditches its previous human cast to introduce blue-collar Texan inventor Cade Yeager (Mark Wahlberg); his daughter Tessa (Nicola Peltz); her racing driver boyfriend Shane (Jack Reynor); and Cade’s assistant Lucas (T. J. Miller). Cade has a kind of Doc Brown operation going on, building dodgy robot guard dogs and butlers in his shed. While trawling an abandoned cinema for parts he can fix and sell (the previous owner complains that audiences are now only interested in a “bunch of crap sequels and remakes”) he finds the wreckage of an old truck, which turns out to be a down-and-out Optimus Prime.

In a thrown-away political metaphor, the post-Chicago Transformers are now positioned as illegal aliens, no longer trusted to “fight American wars”. Washington’s official line is that only Decepticons are being hunted, but for rogue CIA bigwig Harold Attinger (Kelsey Grammer), “There are no good or bad aliens: it’s just us and them.” With his henchman Savoy (Titus Welliver) and the help of an alien bounty hunter of unclear allegiance, Attinger is on a Transformer eradication kick. But he’s also in cahoots with billionaire design genius Joshua Joyce (Stanley Tucci), whose company has a government contract to melt down old Transformers and build new controllable ones from the leftover programmable matter. He’s got Megatron’s head. That won’t end well. The magic metal is dubbed “Transformium”, which edges Unobtainium in the stupid-name stakes by at least being a joke coined by proud-of-themselves lab dorks.

So that’s working-class heroes; the government and CIA corruption; Big Business; outlaw Transformers; and a third set of alien robot hunters that are neither Decepticon nor Autobot. We’re only 40 minutes in. The extinction device the title refers to is a cyberforming “seed”. It’s important as a MacGuffin, but isn’t introduced until around the halfway point. There’s so much plot — much of it left hanging for future sequels, including a tantalising thread about heading off into space to kill God — that even at the length it is, sections still feel abridged: on one occasion we’re suddenly regaled with a Wahlberg voiceover explaining where he’s going and what he’ll do when he gets there. And yet, all this story is still just a loose string on which to hang the bludgeoning set-pieces.

There are car chases, the first of which actually has little Transformer action. There are smashed buildings and massive explosions (“Possible civilian casualties,” someone warns. No **** There’s a sky-chase, and a thrillingly vertiginous high-wire sequence. For seemingly no other reason than the franchise’s Eastern popularity, the film ups sticks to China for its final act. And there are copious hero shots: a father-daughter moment made epic by a Bay sunset; a meeting of the remaining Autobots in Monument Valley; a spaceship flying over the Great Wall Of China; Optimus Prime riding a Dinobot. (Oh yes, the Dinobots. Much trumpeted, they show up for the final half hour and have no distinguishable personalities or point.)

In some ways Bay does seem to have been chastened by previous criticism. While there’s still racial stereotyping afoot — Ken Watanabe’s Drift is a samurai Autobot who spouts Japanese homilies and calls Optimus “Sensei”; everyone in Hong Kong is a kung-fu fighter — there’s nothing quite as egregious as Revenge Of The Fallen’s Skids and Mudflap. The lecherous camera has also been reined in to an extent, although Bay’s low angles still can’t resist the odd Peltz arse ogle.

That this doesn’t happen more often reflects the extent to which Peltz is quickly sidelined in the narrative; female characters in general come out of Age Of Extinction poorly. Li Bingbing, though strong in the ballbreaking sense, also makes little impression, and one has to feel particularly bad for Sophia Myles, who begins the film with a seemingly important role and then disappears for two hours. When she comes back she plays no part in the proceedings except to be physically present.

In fact, it’s debatable what role any of the humans play in the story outside of Kelsey Grammer and Stanley Tucci. Tucci is the standout, despite a third-hour lurch from oily camp to broader clowning. Wahlberg, on the other hand, while a bigger presence than Shia LaBeouf ever was, inexplicably handy with a space gun and able to fly a ship at a moment’s notice, has so little effect on the film’s outcome that Optimus might just as well have left him and his clan back in Texas.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
gdiego135Dec 4, 2015
It's an okay movie, though it's way too effing long or it feels that way, i don't think Mark Wahlberg is as great as he used to be, i love him as an actor i really do, but now he's just put in movies so women want to buy tickets to it that'sIt's an okay movie, though it's way too effing long or it feels that way, i don't think Mark Wahlberg is as great as he used to be, i love him as an actor i really do, but now he's just put in movies so women want to buy tickets to it that's the only reason, overall movie is meh. Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
2
AijixeSep 27, 2015
I can't believe I'm gonna say this, but... I miss Shia LaBeouf. Dear god, why Marky Mark as the lead role? Why so much product placement? Why do you use ROBOT DINOSAURS as a major selling point and barely even show them in the film?! JustI can't believe I'm gonna say this, but... I miss Shia LaBeouf. Dear god, why Marky Mark as the lead role? Why so much product placement? Why do you use ROBOT DINOSAURS as a major selling point and barely even show them in the film?! Just stop.
The only thing that saves the movie from a 0 or a 1 is the CGI. That's fine. Next time, Michael, just give us a 3 hour robot fight, please.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
0
SirKirbyThe4thSep 23, 2015
Words cannot describe how dreadful this movie is. If you watch this, at least a year will be taken off your life. It's so bad, that I've heard someone DIED after the 5th or 6th climax. With out a doubt, the WORST movie I've ever seen. AtWords cannot describe how dreadful this movie is. If you watch this, at least a year will be taken off your life. It's so bad, that I've heard someone DIED after the 5th or 6th climax. With out a doubt, the WORST movie I've ever seen. At least Troll 2 is laughably bad, this movie just leaves you with all the negative emotions a person could possibly have. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
2
marc5477Sep 10, 2015
It is very painful to watch a beloved franchise from childhood brought down by a money grab. You would think that with all the money being thrown at movies today, they could hire quality writers with some background in science (since this isIt is very painful to watch a beloved franchise from childhood brought down by a money grab. You would think that with all the money being thrown at movies today, they could hire quality writers with some background in science (since this is a sci-fi setting)... but alas, this is yet another embarrassment to the Transformers franchise. You know a movie is very bad when you regret watching it for free... Clipping my nails would have been more exciting than this movie as we continue to see stupid plots bring outdone by even stupider plots. This time, we are going to top it off with even more hollywood cliches like a dumb scientist (when will they realize that this is a misnomer) bring led by his "responsible" tween daughter in tight shorts and heels. Yes, the scientist is the idiot of the show... well at least they got rid of the rapping retard transformers I guess... Expand
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
6
TheDude-Sep 3, 2015
In my opinion this is the best transformers sequel and is the only transformers sequel that doesn't suck it just isn't very good its got some good characters such as Stanley tucci as the head of ksi and Kelsey grammar playing a pretty damnIn my opinion this is the best transformers sequel and is the only transformers sequel that doesn't suck it just isn't very good its got some good characters such as Stanley tucci as the head of ksi and Kelsey grammar playing a pretty damn good villain another good villain is deadlock and even has some inventive action sequences such as the dinobots but of course the film is weighed down by a poor script and characterization along with even more boring government conspiracy dialogue from the last film. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
0
ShotgunMongolAug 25, 2015
HOW THE **** DO YOU MAKE A MOVIE THIS BAD?!?!? Jesus, I really don't understand how a human being with a functioning brain ban make a movie like this! The CGI is horrible, the product placement is just distasteful, the pandering (more likeHOW THE **** DO YOU MAKE A MOVIE THIS BAD?!?!? Jesus, I really don't understand how a human being with a functioning brain ban make a movie like this! The CGI is horrible, the product placement is just distasteful, the pandering (more like cock sucking honestly) to China is so prevalent, the acting is just bland, and the story is just, Jesus, it is something to behold.... If this site allowed for negative ratings I would go for a nice -10 and an actual human **** inside a jar shipped to Michael Bay. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
6
ViolettAug 23, 2015
At first I thought I see Interstellar - same fields, same house, same town. First 30 minutes of the movie was not bad, but then after Tessa's boyfriend showed up it became one bad drama movie. This parent-dislike-daughters-boyfriend themeAt first I thought I see Interstellar - same fields, same house, same town. First 30 minutes of the movie was not bad, but then after Tessa's boyfriend showed up it became one bad drama movie. This parent-dislike-daughters-boyfriend theme again? Come on, we saw this million times - at first he hates him, then he threatens him, at the end he loves him - it was plain from that very moment. Average action movie with awful plot. That was expected from Michael Bay. Well, at least there is no Shael LaBef. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
3
grandpajoe6191Aug 18, 2015
Michael Bay has officially hit the bottom, even in his standards; watch has he creates the ultimate 3 hour, repeated slow motion, Victoria's secret/ Budweiser/ beats/ Lamborghini/ other crap endorsement-filled, **** cast and their horriblyMichael Bay has officially hit the bottom, even in his standards; watch has he creates the ultimate 3 hour, repeated slow motion, Victoria's secret/ Budweiser/ beats/ Lamborghini/ other crap endorsement-filled, **** cast and their horribly bad acting movie that is "Transformers: Age of Extinction". Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
1
BoogeeFilmGuyAug 9, 2015
After watching this movie, I figured that the only thing that was on the Age of Extinction was HUMANITY! Am I right? Anyway, on with the review:

Transformers 4 is longer, stupider and duller than the past three movies. The first one was
After watching this movie, I figured that the only thing that was on the Age of Extinction was HUMANITY! Am I right? Anyway, on with the review:

Transformers 4 is longer, stupider and duller than the past three movies. The first one was watchable, the second was crap and the third was pretty bad. THIS one? This was near to unwatchable. Not worth the price of admission.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
randomthoughts3Jul 19, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The battle for human survival never been more visually catchy. Unfortunately, the camera handling, too much tilt screen display, and close-up made me dizzy. But I like the father and daughter relationship. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
Th3GreenHorne7Jul 5, 2015
I was waiting for Shia LeBauf to leave, and hey? HE LEFT! Great! nobody wants to hear him screaming anymore, and glad to have Mark Whalberg killing robots.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
0
chrisvbJul 3, 2015
I went into this movie wanting to like it. I liked the first Transformers, I thought Revenge of the Fallen was awful, and Dark of the Moon was decent. I figured Michael Bay would improve in Age of Extinction after learning from the mistakesI went into this movie wanting to like it. I liked the first Transformers, I thought Revenge of the Fallen was awful, and Dark of the Moon was decent. I figured Michael Bay would improve in Age of Extinction after learning from the mistakes from the previous movies. I was wrong. The story makes absolutely no sense. Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
7
angrynerdincJun 26, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is pretty fun. I saw this with my dad and we both liked it. I think it is the second best of the series, the best, of course, being the first one. This movie is still way too long, and the dinobots weren't in the movie enough to warrant them being on every single poster promoting the film. But Bay seemed to actually make this movie with a thought in his mind about having a plot. The animation is great in this film and the plot is actually pretty cool. It's nonsensical, sure, but it's easy to follow. This is a legitimately good picture, and does provide a refreshing new cast and tone to the series. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
1
mitomJun 26, 2015
This movie is stupid enough (from the story to the dialogues everything is really really dumb) and long enough to get annoying and then irritating

1 point out of ten because the vote for the movie itself would be -10, but special effects
This movie is stupid enough (from the story to the dialogues everything is really really dumb) and long enough to get annoying and then irritating

1 point out of ten because the vote for the movie itself would be -10, but special effects are worth 11.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
SchroederRockJun 21, 2015
The problem with Age of Extinction isn't the scope/scale and slick production. Transformers has always produced complex and large-scale sequences with mostly CGI work and pulled it off pretty well. No, the problem is substance, which hasThe problem with Age of Extinction isn't the scope/scale and slick production. Transformers has always produced complex and large-scale sequences with mostly CGI work and pulled it off pretty well. No, the problem is substance, which has been lacking ever since the first Transformers film. I maintain that the second movie is the worst of these films (so far), but Age of Extinction isn't a whole lot better. It's too long, too littered with action sequences that come off gratuitous instead of meaningful. Bay has a flair for the dramatic and can capture some incredible scenes, but the ownership of Transformers need to figure out how to tell a good story and better dialogue or they'll completely tarnish what could be a cool universe to explore (much like how the Marvel universe translates well to sequels and spin-offs). Mark Wahlberg can turn in a better performance too, he just needs better material to work with. Personally, I'd rather see Transformers can some of the silly tendencies and get a little grittier, a little more serious, instead of mercilessly tossing in one-liners to break the tension (Avengers seems to do this more tactfully than any other movie I can think of). AoE isn't terrible, but it's length and at-times overwhelming on-screen action doesn't make me eager to see it a second time. Expand
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
3
PeterAlexanderJun 13, 2015
Transformers: Age of Extinction is best watched as either a comedy or a two hour session of mockery. In this sense, the entry price was well worth the entertaining experience. My expectations going into this film were low as it was, but I atTransformers: Age of Extinction is best watched as either a comedy or a two hour session of mockery. In this sense, the entry price was well worth the entertaining experience. My expectations going into this film were low as it was, but I at least thought it would have some redeeming qualities as its predecessors did. I have never been more wrong in my life. With terrible dialogue, atrocious camera work, non-existent character development and a predictable and unoriginal storyline, Age of Extinction follows the pattern of it's previous instalments, only to a worse degree. Most of the film simply doesn't make sense, with contradictions around every corner. I found myself nitpicking everything wrong with the film, which was the vast majority. However, the real sadness comes when you start to imagine how you would re-work each conversation, each camera shot, each sequence. In doing this it occurs to you that you would be able to make a Transformer's film at least five times more powerful and exciting than Michael Bay's version. Given Michael Bay only looks like failing more and more with each film he makes, unless Transformer's changes directors, it will continue to remain the laughing stock of movie blockbusters. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
chepod8Jun 11, 2015
Justo cuando creía que esta franquicia no podía decaer más, parece que se empeñaron en demostrar lo contrario, increíble que una quinta parte esta en proceso.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
GentM2015Jun 11, 2015
Transformers Age of Extinction is overall a very good movie in my opinion.The movie isn't going for an Oscar or anything but still the Visuals and the story line were enough to keep me engaged until the very end.Maybe I just like bigTransformers Age of Extinction is overall a very good movie in my opinion.The movie isn't going for an Oscar or anything but still the Visuals and the story line were enough to keep me engaged until the very end.Maybe I just like big explosions,long running time movies and Robots fighting.What can I say,I enjoyed the movie. Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
5
oblique15May 30, 2015
It`s entertaining, but don`t expect anything beyond a popcorn movie.Do not watch it before any decent movie. ONly watch it when you can`t find anything else interesting. or you will regret it. Once again nice action, but like the previousIt`s entertaining, but don`t expect anything beyond a popcorn movie.Do not watch it before any decent movie. ONly watch it when you can`t find anything else interesting. or you will regret it. Once again nice action, but like the previous transformers unnecessary stuff. Mark Wahlbergs character has a daughter just to serve Micheal Bays needs. I f you`re gonna have a girl running around can you at least come up with a legit reason for it.Plenty of opportunity for her to get away from the chaos, but it never happens. I will say their was less of the unnecessary stuff in this one, but it was enough to annoy me. At least they got rid of Shia LaBeoufs character and all the characters that follow him along like his parents.Also it`s a very long movie, so if your not entertained the length will make it even worst. Plase never give Micheal Bay a Transformer movie again if you want them to be any good. Please don`t give him any movie with characters I want to see. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
reviewguy02Apr 30, 2015
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Mediclore. Why? Here:
* Its not too bad, but its too long, 3 HOURS!
* Exessive screaming and explosions worsen it too.
* The story is ok, but a bit sad, seeing Ratchet get killed within the first few moments as well as Lockdowns (which is cool since he is evil) brutal head ripping death.
* Too many human scenes which are mostly pointless.
* Not enough robots, too little.
* A bit too violent for little kids.
* Bad dialouge.

If there all the robot scenes are collected together, maybe the film would end up being 40 minutes long, far from 165 minutes
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
0
monster0420Apr 29, 2015
In my opinion, this is the worst out of the entire franchise. This movie has an almost 3 hour run time. The main characters you really don't care about at all. Forced humor, forced romance. This movie just gets really lazy. The CGI in it isIn my opinion, this is the worst out of the entire franchise. This movie has an almost 3 hour run time. The main characters you really don't care about at all. Forced humor, forced romance. This movie just gets really lazy. The CGI in it is really bad and very disappointing. So much product placement as well. This movie is full of Bay-isms. Explosions, racism, product placement, hot extras. It's terrible. They ruined a character that had so much potential, Galvatron. I could go on and on about it. Keeping it short, this movie sucks on every level. The worst one out of the franchise. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
1
MovieManiac83Apr 22, 2015
Michael Bay has often said how he loves to "blow things up real good." Well, if that's his desire in life, there's little doubt that he tops himself in Transformers: Age of Extinction. This is as excruciating a movie as is likely to beMichael Bay has often said how he loves to "blow things up real good." Well, if that's his desire in life, there's little doubt that he tops himself in Transformers: Age of Extinction. This is as excruciating a movie as is likely to be experienced by anyone, anywhere. It isn't merely that the story is insulting, the characters are bland, the action is dull, and the CGI is everywhere - it's that all this goes on for nearly three hours. That's three hours of your life you'll never get back.

Bay keeps saying he's done with the Transformers franchise but it draws him back like flies to **** This time around, the human actors from the earlier films have been jettisoned. At first glance, that might seem like a good thing until one realizes that people in Bay films are as interesting and important as background décor. It's really all about the robots, the orgiastic display of CGI destruction, and (of course) the explosions. I wish I could say "just sit back and enjoy the ride", but there's a reason roller coasters are only a few minutes long.

Is there a story here? It's not War and Peace but there's something that might be mistaken for the skeleton of a plot if viewed in dim light. For those who care about continuity, events in Transformers: Age of Extinction take place five years after those of the previous film, Transformers: Dark of the Moon. By this time, the Transformers have been virtually eliminated from Earth as a result of a ruthless cleansing scheme spearheaded by CIA Black Ops hotshot Harold Attinger (Kelsey Grammer in full Stinky Pete mode). Attinger has help from a Decepticon called "Lockdown" (voice of Mark Ryan), who has come to Earth in search of Optimus Prime (voice of Peter Cullen). The CIA bad guy has also formed an alliance with billionaire inventor Joshua Joyce (Stanley Tucci), who has figured out how to build Transformers. His pilot project is something he calls "Galvatron" (voice of Frank Welker) - a robot that looks an awful like the dreaded (and supposedly dead) Megatron.

n the acting department, Mark Wahlberg is an upgrade on Shia Labeouf, although it hardly matters. Walhberg does his job and stands around looking suitably awed, angry, or frightened, depending on what the script requires. Somehow, Stanley Tucci manages to rise above the material and leave an impression. It helps that he's used partially for comedic relief and gets to utter the best one-liner (one that uses up the movie's PG-13 single "f-word" allowance). Tucci's success is counterbalanced by Nicola Peltz's failure. The Transformers movies have had their share of annoying characters but none (not even the one played by Megan Fox) has achieved the apex occupied by Peltz's Tessa, who one-ups the worst horror movie heroine in terms of incompetence, ignorance, and irritation factor. On more than one occasion, I was actively rooting for a robot to stomp on her or for her to fall from a great height and make a satisfying splat. I guess this could be considered a step forward for Bay - he made me feel something about a human being in a Transformers film.

n the end, there's a sense that nothing much happens in Transformers: Age of Extinction, although that "nothing" is long, loud, and flashy. Bay's approach, which is technically proficient but without charm or life, bludgeons viewers into a near-catatonic state. If one takes a step back and looks at Transformers: Age of Extinction from a distance, the story isn't confusing but, while watching it, the sense of chaos is almost overwhelming. Shakespeare didn't know it, but when he wrote of "sound and fury signifying nothing," he could have been describing this franchise.

I understand that this is a "fanboy" driven production intended only to please those who either play with Transformers toys or have fond memories of doing so in their youth. However, it's disappointing to see how contemptuous the filmmakers are of anyone who pays good money to see a movie in the hope that it will offer more than cool special effects (that become progressively less "cool" the longer the film runs). This is blockbuster moviemaking at its worst - a product so cynical that it doesn't try to pretend it's anything more than a mindless spectacle. It's endless, tiresome, and tedious, but it will make so much money that Transformers 5 is a foregone conclusion. I can't think of a more compelling reason to hate Transformers: Age of Extinction.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
VinceRocks123Apr 7, 2015
Michael Bay for sure had blew away more than we can suffer on his table of torturous Ka-Boom!
an insult to a generation which tends to have you vomiting on your popcorn and choking to the point you won't be talking for days
Director
Michael Bay for sure had blew away more than we can suffer on his table of torturous Ka-Boom!
an insult to a generation which tends to have you vomiting on your popcorn and choking to the point you won't be talking for days

Director Michael Bay has returned and has officially ruined the Transformers franchise by taking a much larger tsunami dump into his faltered grade B- trilogy with a solid grade F reboot fourth installment

the film had more lazy direction that you can notice most of the scenes weren't visually edited, more explosions, domestic violence that will scar your kids for life, more of Bay's signature explosive trademarks, hot girls with no shred of shame or morality, more favorite autobot deaths, gory retribution, new but unimpressingly lame Autobot characters, and probably Mark Wahlberg's biggest mistake since The Happening, starring alongside alongside new Bay girl of the year Nicola Peltz from the much more painful the Last Airbender, the film is so bad they found a lazy excuse to cut the filming and shift the entire remainder of filming to Hong Kong (also in an unedited shot you can see the Chicago Sears Tower WHEN YOUR SUPPOSED TO BE IN HONG KONG!!) a terrible gimmick to get more money at the Box Office by buying foreign nations to buy the film by filming it in their country overseas, that as an average american viewer, you can't stop it from being an elaborate staged box office success

the franchise has suffered enough by the hands of the f@#% dyne-rector Bay who is probably the only director who gets away
Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
4
tjman09Mar 30, 2015
This film epitomizes commercialism over art, and that's the reason I hate it. The film as a film is terrible, the poor is incoherent, the film is loaded with dumb humor, poorly developed characters, terrible dialogue, laughable acting, andThis film epitomizes commercialism over art, and that's the reason I hate it. The film as a film is terrible, the poor is incoherent, the film is loaded with dumb humor, poorly developed characters, terrible dialogue, laughable acting, and even more explosions in slow motion. All of this plus the fact that it feels like an almost 3 hour bud light commercial, is why I hate it. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
9
CherryxldMar 29, 2015
Transformers: Age of extinction, con sus avances en los trailers, podemos ver bastante acción y explosiones, por tanto es lo que probablemente varios espectadores esperaron, y es lo que en gran parte se vio en este film.

Esta película se
Transformers: Age of extinction, con sus avances en los trailers, podemos ver bastante acción y explosiones, por tanto es lo que probablemente varios espectadores esperaron, y es lo que en gran parte se vio en este film.

Esta película se podría decir que era una de las más esperadas en su año y que al final en donde se esperaban varios explosiones, acción, peleas, y grandes transformers (como fué en las anteriores entregas), y, al fin al cabo, no los entregó de una manera potente. Sí, es cierto de que tiene un guión un poco flojo y que resulta bastante larga (más de 160 minutos) por tanto se podría decir que la primera hora llega a ser un tanto pesada., pero al final toda la acción que nos ofrece y la potente carga de efectos visuales (merecedores de al menos una Nominación al Oscar) logran darle mucha más vida a este largometraje bastante explosivo, por así decirlo.
Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
6
DreadLordAvatarMar 12, 2015
Perfect title for a long-dead series, but AoE is the best out of the Bay films. Bought the Bluray for the Atmos soundtrack and the film is highly enjoyable. Wahlberg is brilliant, and the cgi visuals are eye popping. Alternatively forPerfect title for a long-dead series, but AoE is the best out of the Bay films. Bought the Bluray for the Atmos soundtrack and the film is highly enjoyable. Wahlberg is brilliant, and the cgi visuals are eye popping. Alternatively for Transformer fans wishing more, watch reruns of the 80's classic and that's all she wrote. Expand
7 of 14 users found this helpful77
All this user's reviews
1
MattBrady99Mar 10, 2015
Oh my god this movie was 3 hours long!!. The movie is about the government has decided to cut all ties with Autobots. They may be forgotten - but they are not gone - and a mechanic and his daughter discover one of the most powerful of theOh my god this movie was 3 hours long!!. The movie is about the government has decided to cut all ties with Autobots. They may be forgotten - but they are not gone - and a mechanic and his daughter discover one of the most powerful of the Autobots in their possession and it ignites a full-blown showdown between the Decepticons, Autobots and the government. This movie has terrible looking visual effect's and the characters are forgettable as always. The only good thing in this movie is Optimus prime and Mark Wahlberg, but anything else is crap. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
7
Arthur_S_PoeFeb 17, 2015
I actually considered the film a step forward compared to installments two and three. Surely, one cannot expect much from this franchise - it is an action packed film with giant robots and giant dinosaur robots without any artistic value orI actually considered the film a step forward compared to installments two and three. Surely, one cannot expect much from this franchise - it is an action packed film with giant robots and giant dinosaur robots without any artistic value or depth whatsoever. Whoever expected more is quite gullible. Now, compared to the earlier installments - I actually thought this one was better than most of them, with the exception of the first one. It doesn't elevate the animation, the story is basically the same with a wonderful variety of holes and WTF moments, but all in all - it does deliver the anticipated and expected adrenaline burst you'd want to get when watching giant robot dinosaurs (finally, Michael, finally - the Dinobots!). The Mark Whalberg-plot is better than the one with Shia, Stanley Tucci is charming as always and the plot itself is pretty much digestible. As far as a major minus goes, the new Autobots are just... what? why? I mean, we've seen three movies and I'm all for bringing in new and original characters (I mean, John Goodman was brilliant!), but with an already developed franchise it looks exceptionally dumb to introduce new characters that haven't been mentioned before... ever. That was my biggest objection to the movie.

To sum it up, another shallow action packed adrenaline rush delivered by Michael Bay, but certainly something better than some of the earlier installments. Unlike the others, this is watchable for both fans and those who just like to see things get smashed but with no Hulk around...
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
2
AussieOfSteelFeb 11, 2015
Terrible movie. No plot, horrible acting (except Wahlberg) and bad screenplay and too damn long! Once again, Michael Bay delivers a blow to childhood memories
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews