Titanic

Paramount Pictures | Release Date: December 19, 1997

8.4	USER SCORE Universal acclaim based on 1505 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

python2000Aug 14, 2013

The main reason everybody likes this movie is because of the last 30 minutes where the boat sinks, it's awesome but that means the rest of the movie is irrelevant. Leonardo Di Caprio and Kate Winslet are a terrible couple and the onlyThe main reason everybody likes this movie is because of the last 30 minutes where the boat sinks, it's awesome but that means the rest of the movie is irrelevant. Leonardo Di Caprio and Kate Winslet are a terrible couple and the only chemistry is between the ship and the iceberg.… Expand

9 of 15 users found this helpful96

All this user's reviews

PetrocelliApr 5, 2015

Maybe the most overrated movie ever. Special effects meet a dopey screenplay and bad acting. The plot: Kate Winslet's boyfriend gets her the biggest diamond in the world, and takes her to NYC in the biggest stateroom in the biggest oceanMaybe the most overrated movie ever. Special effects meet a dopey screenplay and bad acting. The plot: Kate Winslet's boyfriend gets her the biggest diamond in the world, and takes her to NYC in the biggest stateroom in the biggest ocean liner in the world. She pays him back by banging a guy from steerage in front of all his friends. What a trollop. The only disappointment is that this cheap whore didn't go down with the boat. Love story? Only if you think a cheating tramp is a heroine.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

JsismsJan 20, 2023

It is a very boring movie I fell asleep watching it and the truth is that it is not enjoyable at all and the "action" scenes are very pathetic

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

BacoN_PorcospinFeb 3, 2023

Il Film è noioso, e dura 3 ore e passa. La storia è banale e sceneggiatura a malapena accettabile. L'unica cosa decente sono gli effetti speciali

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

matroycemMay 13, 2013

The story of the Titanic is well known and so the backing plot will not come as a surprise. However the Writers thought that they had to MAKE a story to make the film. This consisted in a Terrible Love story, Weak characters and a stupid runThe story of the Titanic is well known and so the backing plot will not come as a surprise. However the Writers thought that they had to MAKE a story to make the film. This consisted in a Terrible Love story, Weak characters and a stupid run time. The performances, cinematography and special effects were good. But the character development was rubbish and I really did not get emotional involved with anyone. There was no real suspense which I know can be done in a film like this if the characters get under your skin. I would have prefered to stay more with the people who were left to die rather than see the film through the eyes of the Gentry aboard the HMS Titanic. The scene with Rose and Jack and the painting... What was the point? did we need to have it other than just to make it news worthy. I cannot believe that this film grossed as much as it did. People went Back to see it. Was there something they missed? Maybe they went back to search for a plot but that went down with the ship.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

mrdr4gonDec 15, 2017

From a technical perspective this is a flawless film - in other respects however, it mostly fails through having a flat and predictably cheesy love story - a complete and almost insulting waste of the real life tragedy as a source material.From a technical perspective this is a flawless film - in other respects however, it mostly fails through having a flat and predictably cheesy love story - a complete and almost insulting waste of the real life tragedy as a source material. Mostly exists to show off the effects in it's end-sequence - but that's 100+ minutes of your life you're wasting watching Jack and Rose to see effects that would end up being dated in a few years.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

MariofanMar 17, 2015

This movie generally sucked. It is the most overrated movie of all time next to Frozen, Toy Story 3 and The Social Network. The script, acting, love story and characters are all complete garbage. The visuals and Titanic sinking part are kindaThis movie generally sucked. It is the most overrated movie of all time next to Frozen, Toy Story 3 and The Social Network. The script, acting, love story and characters are all complete garbage. The visuals and Titanic sinking part are kinda cool though. Stay away from this movie. And why did it win 11 oscars?!… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

PeteOppelSep 26, 2021

If director James Cameron had concentrated on his thesis -- that the sailing of the Titanic basically marked the transition from 19th Century ideas of classism to 20th Century notions of egalitarianism -- and had ignored the boring loveIf director James Cameron had concentrated on his thesis -- that the sailing of the Titanic basically marked the transition from 19th Century ideas of classism to 20th Century notions of egalitarianism -- and had ignored the boring love story, this could have been a far more impactful feature.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

geewahDec 12, 2020

Ordinary and and utterly predictable piece of storytelling. Special effects are great but that doesn't make up for this bloated and dull movie.
How it won the best picture oscar is anyones guess.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

williamp56Feb 1, 2023

does anyone ACTUALLY remember this movie lol, total chick flick... PASS. gave it a three because at least it had a little "something something" for the guys heh

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

JawsPapi87Sep 2, 2011

Oh do I hate this movie!!! Why did it have to center on a sappy love story? And why so formulaic? And why such a terrible script? And why such over the top and upfront heartbreak? AND WHY BEST PICTURE???

14 of 53 users found this helpful1439

All this user's reviews

pauljohnsonJun 6, 2012

11 Oscars? Why? While James Cameron's "Titanic" certainly delivers as a visual feast and a breakthrough in set design, it is bogged down by a predictable love story without anything new brought to the tired formula. The real stories of the11 Oscars? Why? While James Cameron's "Titanic" certainly delivers as a visual feast and a breakthrough in set design, it is bogged down by a predictable love story without anything new brought to the tired formula. The real stories of the real people and real heroism on board the ship are shamelessly ignored, and sometimes offensively twisted, in the film's portrayal of the Titanic's First Officer, Lieutenant William Murdoch. So offensively in fact, the film's production staff had to apologise to the entire town where Murdoch grew up. What's worse, is that this film has become synonymous with the real story of the Titanic. So, a real story of Human sacrifice, heroism, bravery and selflessness in the face of impending death has been supplanted by a third-rate teeny-bopper love story. Great.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

DravenatorLivesAug 30, 2011

James, James, James. Why did you have to be the one to direct this **** on the face of America. Titanic is a romanticisation of the Titanic tragedy. Kate and Leo do a relatively good job acting, but that's because they're the only thingJames, James, James. Why did you have to be the one to direct this **** on the face of America. Titanic is a romanticisation of the Titanic tragedy. Kate and Leo do a relatively good job acting, but that's because they're the only thing saving the movie from sinking on the review charts like the Titanic. I mean, I respect James and all, but this movie was the god-damn black sheep of them.… Expand

4 of 17 users found this helpful413

All this user's reviews

JimG.Nov 28, 2005

Muzak for the eyes. Tedious, vacuous, schmaltz.

2 of 13 users found this helpful

Steven1981Apr 22, 2020

Titanic is a 1997 film directed by James Cameron who brought us classics such as The Abyss, Aliens and The Terminator... He also brought us True Lies but that film was so bad it's unbelievable.... TITANIC has a fairly decent story but theTitanic is a 1997 film directed by James Cameron who brought us classics such as The Abyss, Aliens and The Terminator... He also brought us True Lies but that film was so bad it's unbelievable.... TITANIC has a fairly decent story but the acting from Billy Zane and Leonardo DiCaprio is ridiculous and spoils the film. The only good acting done in this film is by Kate Winslet and to me she looks beautiful and is the only good part of this film but the rest sort of spoils it and I don't like Leonardo DiCaprio anyway as an actor and to be honest the only film of his I've seen which I liked is The Quick and the Dead (1995). Of course Leonardo DiCaprio's character in Titanic dies at the end and we are meant to feel sorry for him and is so unbelievable. Of course this film is obvious, predictable until the end when you think all of the ships people will die then you think Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet will survive and only one does. Titanic has some romance, nudity and is more of an adventure film than anything that I hope stays sunk and never gets a sequel which I doubt it because this film was bad enough. Also watch out for Bill Paxton as he makes an appearance in Titanic if only short but even he couldn't save this film from sinking.… Expand

2 of 13 users found this helpful211

All this user's reviews

ChrisB.Jul 5, 2007

Worst movie ever made. Were it not for Kate Winslet being naked for a couple of minutes, I'd have gouged my eyes out. There probably would have been a class-action lawsuit against James Cameron because his movie caused blindness due to Worst movie ever made. Were it not for Kate Winslet being naked for a couple of minutes, I'd have gouged my eyes out. There probably would have been a class-action lawsuit against James Cameron because his movie caused blindness due to eye-gouging had Kate Winslet not been naked. It's a bullshit romance. Go watch Rambo or something if you want to see a real movie. You know, one where there's no character development and shit gets blown up because it's awesome.… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful

TSJul 26, 2009

Along with Braveheart and Forrest Gump, one of the worst Oscar winners of all time. Pure turgid drivel. A chick flick for the mentally defective.

2 of 15 users found this helpful

JamsB.Jun 24, 2008

I would have given it about a 5 as it is an average try-hard hollywood blockbuster but the fact that you see Kate Winslet's horrible naked body makes it a zero.

1 of 9 users found this helpful

titanicsucksJul 21, 2016

I once watched a trailer for titanic it was the most autistic gay piece of crap movie trailer there for the movie sucks i repeat the movie sucks. Also all of You haters who say i can not write a review on a movie i have not seen screw you toI once watched a trailer for titanic it was the most autistic gay piece of crap movie trailer there for the movie sucks i repeat the movie sucks. Also all of You haters who say i can not write a review on a movie i have not seen screw you to hell because titanic is crap. 0/10… Expand

1 of 15 users found this helpful114

All this user's reviews

Valentine730Jan 25, 2018

Horriable movie its a porn movie with that moment with jack humping roses so apporate for me i lost my child hood. This movie is for mastorbaters and bet you agree with me too. It had good humor too not the movie but this review.

1 of 25 users found this helpful124

All this user's reviews

StephenB.Dec 26, 2008

Mr. Cameron started his career by establishing himself as a great science-fiction writer/director, able to simultaneously be exciting and smart. He delievered on that promise with the two "Terminator" films and the completely awesome Mr. Cameron started his career by establishing himself as a great science-fiction writer/director, able to simultaneously be exciting and smart. He delievered on that promise with the two "Terminator" films and the completely awesome "Aliens". In fact, in some jurisdictions, not liking "Aliens" is considered a criminal act. However, having proved his talent at greatness, he decided to switch gears and try sucking for a change. And so we have... this... abomination. Gone are the great writing and pacing that anchored his previous sci-fi outings, instead replaced with a laughable script, incessant repetition and miscasting galore. There are no characters, just cardboard cutouts. The historic mistakes are mind-boggling. Even composer James Horner turns in a huge pile of cliched, faux-"romantic" gloop, all the more travesty if you remember he did the rousing score of "Aliens". Yes, the SFX is good and probably the only part of the film I will ever find anything positive to say. I have no idea why the director abandoned the niche he was most successful in for another where he fails. The final impression: "I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit".… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful

LawrenceY.Dec 29, 2008

If you like disaster films, this is the film for you. But if you dont like to see love in a disaster film, just leave this one alone.

0 of 3 users found this helpful

snakeordeathJun 6, 2017

You know that scene where they are at the front of the boat, they should have jumped and saved us the screentime. I want my 7 dollars back for the floppy disk I purchased this movie on. The part where they die...best part.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

NickGomesGuyJun 14, 2019

Good screenplay and without any boring scene James Cameron is a genius and a pioneer in vfx tech

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews