The Wolf of Wall Street

8

catcarloJan 28, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Per raccontare la vita sciagurata di Jordan Belfort, Scorsese recupera la struttura di uno dei suoi film migliori in assoluto, ‘Quei bravi ragazzi’. In entrambi i casi, alla base c’è la (auto)biografia del protagonista che racconta la propria parabola esistenziale senza risparmiarsi le peggiori abiezioni, ma lasciando una vaga sensazione di nostalgia per i giorni di gloria a dar l'impressione che il pentimento non sia proprio completo: la sceneggiatura (qui firmata da Terence Winter) la trasforma in un racconto in prima persona, con la voce sopra del protagonista che, d'ogni tanto, si rivolge direttamente allo spettatore guardando in macchina mentre attorno a lui la sua storia procede a ritmo adrenalinico, quell'adrenalina che – grazie ad abbondanti aiuti chimici – sostiene gli insaziabili personaggi che la popolano. Se Henry Hill aveva sempre voluto essere un gangster, Jordan Belfort ha come unico scopo i soldi a qualsiasi costo per fare la bella vita (non per niente, la sua ispirazione è stato il Gordon Gekko de ‘l'avidità è bella’ in ‘Wall Street’): entrambi verranno fregati, alla fine, dalla sensazione di onnipotenza che un'impunità troppo prolungata procura loro, oltre alla perdita del controllo dovuta ai troppi stupefacenti. Belfort è un ingordo: di sesso, alcool, droga e, ovviamente, del denaro che serve a comprarli. Forte di una grande capacità di venditore con un tappeto sullo stomaco, inizia a piazzare titoli spazzatura a sprovveduti piccoli investitori confidando sulla magnetica attrattiva che i soldi facili hanno su chiunque: quando, dal piccolo gruppo di disperati che ha raccolto, la sua società inizia a diventare una potenza grazie anche a commissioni salatissime, comincia una caccia all'investitore istituzionale e, da una posizione in bilico su ciò che è consentito, ci si inoltra sempre più nei territori dell'illegalità, inevitabile calamita per l'attenzione dei federali che - un po’ per testardaggine, un po’ per fortuna – finiranno per incastrarlo. Varie critiche sono piovute sul film perché non mostra le conseguenze delle azioni del protagonista e della sua società, soprattutto per quanto riguarda la gente che ha distrutto i propri risparmi inseguendo i sogni di ricchezza promessi da un pugno di truffatori senza scrupoli: sarebbe però stato uscire dal seminato del racconto, tanto più che, dalle loro azioni, si capisce benissimo che genere di persone fossero Jordan e compagnia (se non bastasse la brutale spiegazione su come funziona il brokeraggio affidata al trasformista McConaughey poco dopo l'inizio). Il giudizio su di loro è difatti spietato, un gruppo di persone moralmente abiette, pronte a bruciare le montagne di soldi malamente fatti in orge propulse da quantità industriali di droghe: i rapporti sessuali, anche di gruppo, e gli intossicamenti vari si sprecano – compreso un corso in Quaalude per chi si fosse perso quello nei romanzi di Ellroy – e non stupisce allora che il film abbia una produzione indipendente, lontana dagli studios. Di questa bella gente, Belfort è il leader assoluto, un avido e spietato bastardo dentro che distorce il mito, molto statunitense, dell'uomo che si è fatto da sé, ma che è una sorta di dio per chi lavora per lui e ne condivide gli ‘ideali’. Interessato solo a se stesso, non si limita a fregare gli sconosciuti clienti, ma chiunque gli stia intorno se solo c'è da guadagnarci in qualche modo: ovviamente fedifrago nei confronti delle due mogli (anche se la seconda ha le mirabili fattezze di Margit Robbie) e, infine, disposto a tradire i suoi soci per scampare una pena ben più dura dei tre anni che gli vengono comminati. Nei suoi panni, DiCaprio – che è stato il motore del progetto – è semplicemente perfetto, dando un'ulteriore testimonianza di una maturazione attoriale ormai compiuta: non da meno è il resto dello smisurato cast, nel quale non si può non sottolineare la bravura di Jonah Hill nei rotondi, esagitati panni del sodale di sempre Donnie. Scorsese racconta le loro avventure puntando sul registro dell'ironia acida piuttosto che su quello del dramma, tenendo alto il ritmo grazie alla serrata scrittura di Winter (sulla quale gli attori sono stati spesso liberi di improvvisare) e a scelte visive che sanno colpire per la loro efficacia, a partire dalla decisione di utilizzare un montaggio irregolare e lenti anamorfiche (la fotografia è di Rodrigo Prieto) quando i personaggi, e in particolare Jordan, sono strafatti. Ne escono così numerose scene da ricordare, ad esempio quando Belfort incontra per la prima volta l'agente Denham (Kyle Chandler) a bordo del proprio yacht oppure tutto il lungo episodio dello sballo da Quaalude. Quest'ultimo dà anche lustro a una terza ora complessivamente più debole e faticosa delle due, al limite della perfezione, che la hanno preceduta: una perdita di ritmo che abbassa di qualche decimale il giudizio complessivo anche per colpa della sconcertante banalità dell'episodio ‘italiano’ .… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TrilobiteGJul 10, 2015

Ok. The dialogue in this movie is awesome, the cinematography is awesome, the characters are awesome. This movie is a whole bunch of awesome...but it does not get a 10. This movie was WAYYYY TO LONG! 3 hours is a ridiculous amount of time toOk. The dialogue in this movie is awesome, the cinematography is awesome, the characters are awesome. This movie is a whole bunch of awesome...but it does not get a 10. This movie was WAYYYY TO LONG! 3 hours is a ridiculous amount of time to shoot this movie as. Some parts were unnecessary and felt there just as additional sex scenes. I don't mind sex scenes, but I do mind 30 minutes of them. Still, exceptional performance from EVERYONE in this film. Especially Di'Caprio… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

shpreaMar 5, 2014

Sex, drugs, and DiCaprio. That's all you need to make a good movie.
Honestly, the story isn't that good, and the movie tends to drag towards the end. However, that doesn't even matter. It's just fun to watch. There's something riveting aboutSex, drugs, and DiCaprio. That's all you need to make a good movie.
Honestly, the story isn't that good, and the movie tends to drag towards the end. However, that doesn't even matter. It's just fun to watch. There's something riveting about watching Jonah Hill masterbate publicly after seeing an attractive women while high on every drug imaginable. It's a good time from start to end, and that's all it has to be.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

nicholasbertJan 16, 2014

Most of the people here who thumbed this down did it because of the nudity and the language. The MPAA ratings were very clear about this film, and since when Scorsese doesn't use a tonne of swear words in his work? Besides, seeing MargotMost of the people here who thumbed this down did it because of the nudity and the language. The MPAA ratings were very clear about this film, and since when Scorsese doesn't use a tonne of swear words in his work? Besides, seeing Margot Robbie naked is completely a good reason.

Jokes aside, the film is lengthy but never boring, it has elements of both comedy and drama, and the acting is really strong. I always thought films (as all works of art) aren't there for you to learn a lesson out of them, or to get some goody goody morality. This film shows a reality, albeit maybe exaggerated, and it's simply something to entertain you. And it does entertain. If you want to learn things, you should read Forbes.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

8

bm2759Jan 19, 2014

My first thought afterwards was ' wow a lot of people, particularly men, are going to walk away from this and say "yeah I wanna be a stock broker too"! regardless of the message told through this movie '. Admittedly I felt the same way,My first thought afterwards was ' wow a lot of people, particularly men, are going to walk away from this and say "yeah I wanna be a stock broker too"! regardless of the message told through this movie '. Admittedly I felt the same way, especially seeing Jordan Belfort and his colleagues enjoying themselves so much. I mean c'mon booze, hookers, lavish parties, drugs, good times, who doesn't want that; at least a little bit?

But that's the hook all sales jobs promise: if you work hard, don't be discouraged by failures and have the ambition to succeed then you will. Because everyone can be a millionaire right? Wrong. Not everyone can be otherwise millionaires would be everywhere. Truth is you can bust your guts and you may not make anywhere as much as you desired. Big bosses need bums in seats to make them money not you.

And that's exactly what Jordan Belfort does. He even admits this during the film. Of course the commission paid to his workers made them a decently living but the real income goes to Belfort. And he makes a lot! To much to know what to do with.

Through all the funny situations (and there is plenty of those) we see Belfort and co. reveling in greed and success. This obvious draws the attention of the law and it's their stupidity that becomes their undoing, despite some very lucky turns of fortunate beforehand.

The first lesson I learned from this movie is to name your price and get out when you reach it. That's what a strategically minded investor would do instead of being greedy.

The second lesson is if you're doing something illegal and you draw attention to yourself you will get caught eventually. Not if but when.

It does have some shortcomings. For the sake of entertainment what they actually sell and how they do it is glossed over because the focus is upon what happens, not why. I also didn't like the pace of the film as it has so much to tell a lot of it is rushed, which explains why they gloss over details for the sake of timing.

This is a thoroughly entertaining movie about making money that has more relevance in this decade than prior films before it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

InlikeflynnJun 9, 2014

I really liked this movie...

I can't recommend it to just everybody especially considering that some audiences will be offended by some of the imagery that this film has, it can be interpreted wrong by some. I like the story here becauseI really liked this movie...

I can't recommend it to just everybody especially considering that some audiences will be offended by some of the imagery that this film has, it can be interpreted wrong by some. I like the story here because all the events that transpire feel legit and not forced at all, the actors all do an amazing job especially when you see how energetic some of the performances are, you just have to appreciate them; the cinematography is good has well.

Maybe the length of the movie will be too much for some, but I feel that is granted considering that the characters are basically jerks that treat women like objects so this is something that must always be handled with care because some audiences can, again, be offended, the beginning is a little clumsy because of the dialogue however, but I still enjoyed this movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

mbeckfordOct 18, 2020

"Wall Street" but with Leonardi DiCaprio and Jonah Hill on Quaaludes. Scorsese finally takes a a very pleasant break from gangster movies, "Wolf" is an utterly entertaining and hilarious joy ride.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

WalkingDead5640Jun 8, 2014

Outrageous and controversial, clever and filthy, but how so funny and charming. Very entertaining three hours, with terrific performances from the cast. DiCaprio has really proved himself recently as a likable actor and great leading man, asOutrageous and controversial, clever and filthy, but how so funny and charming. Very entertaining three hours, with terrific performances from the cast. DiCaprio has really proved himself recently as a likable actor and great leading man, as he fits into this real life character of Jordan Belfort perfectly. I've never enjoyed watching him as much as here. This film is overloaded with nudity and drugs so be aware. Aside from that, this movie is crazy, with great characters and is a good time.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

8

captscurvyJan 6, 2014

The Hunger
Its no secret that there are investor victims associated with Belfort and his ilk. So why make another work about THAT?! Instead Scorsese wisely provokes us with a portrayal of a modern day Caligula. Belfort is an obsceneThe Hunger
Its no secret that there are investor victims associated with Belfort and his ilk. So why make another work about THAT?! Instead Scorsese wisely provokes us with a portrayal of a modern day Caligula. Belfort is an obscene voracious mad(sales)man, but more interesting is that it takes a mass of 'everyday people' (and deregulation perhaps) to let that kind of wild predation happen. Scorsese hedges a bit but subtly reminds us that too many of us would, by choice or necessity join Belfort. It seems like the film was mostly repeated scenes of Belfort in the office, mic in hand electrifying his vast army of hungry brokers! Sitting in the theater WE become Belfort's audience. Thankfully the Wolf is no edificatory entertainment… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

Prodigy2013Jan 23, 2014

What's a great year in film without a little controversy. Said controversy comes in the form of 'The Wolf of Wall Street'; which reunites master filmmaker Martin Scorsese and actor, Leonardo DiCaprio, after a one film hiatus. It feels soWhat's a great year in film without a little controversy. Said controversy comes in the form of 'The Wolf of Wall Street'; which reunites master filmmaker Martin Scorsese and actor, Leonardo DiCaprio, after a one film hiatus. It feels so long. Anyway, DiCaprio gives a stellar performance as Jordan Belfort, a real life New York stockbroker who ran a firm that engaged in securities fraud and corruption on Wall Street in the 1990's. There was much talks about the film and the way it glorifies the explosive, hedonistic ways of the wealthy one percent. But despite all the "coolness" we are seeing on the screen, is it indeed a glorification or simply a backhanded representation of these drugged out, sex crazed "fiends". Terrence Winter's expletive laden script, was darkly hilarious! I call this the funniest film of the year. The screenplay was incredibly smart and builds a band of memorable characters; with due credit to Scorsese's direction and the supporting cast's (and ofcourse Leo's) electric performances. However I did take a little issue with the length of the story which wielded a staggering three hour run-time on film. Detailing the meteoric rise and fall of the infamous stock broker was a meteoric accomplishment for Scorsese and his usual editor Thelma Schoonmaker. There collaboration made every minute of those three hours entertaining and memorable; very good work. 'The Wolf of Wall Street' was a lot of things; sharp, crude, funny and possibly even iconic. One thing is certain, it was awesomely entertaining.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Carlsdil000Jan 6, 2014

Surprisingly hilarious. The three hour run time makes your antsy to leave the theater and get on with your day, but the pacing in the film is perfect.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

omniscientDec 27, 2013

The hectic, fast-paced Wall Street lifestyle coupled with an insatiable hunger for money present a funny but sad look into Jordan Belfort's (DiCaprio) life as it takes many twists and turns. Scorsese takes you on one hell of a ride.

5 of 68 users found this helpful563

All this user's reviews

8

FranzHcriticJan 26, 2014

While the narration and breaking the fourth wall inhibits weakness in the film, 'Wolf of Wall Street' is a repugnant recollection of one man and his journey through Wall Street, as he f**ks, drinks, snorts and smokes drugs, and cheats withWhile the narration and breaking the fourth wall inhibits weakness in the film, 'Wolf of Wall Street' is a repugnant recollection of one man and his journey through Wall Street, as he f**ks, drinks, snorts and smokes drugs, and cheats with the help of others. DiCaprio is well suited for the charismatic, fresh youg stockbroker Jordan Belfort, and Jonah Hill is hilarious as his weird and hard-partying accomplice. Both are the real threads in the film, although as a man, I couldn't look away from most scenes.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

Jack_SunshineApr 18, 2014

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)
Directed by Martin Scorsese; Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Jonah Hill, Rob Reiner
Rating: 4/5 The fifth collaboration between Martin Scorsese and Leonardo DiCaprio, The Wolf of Wall Street tells the trueThe Wolf of Wall Street (2013)
Directed by Martin Scorsese; Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Jonah Hill, Rob Reiner

Rating: 4/5

The fifth collaboration between Martin Scorsese and Leonardo DiCaprio, The Wolf of Wall Street tells the true story of the rise and fall of Jordan Belfort (DiCaprio), a New York stockbroker who made it big in the wake of the financial crisis of the late ‘80s by shady and frequently illegal means. More interesting is what he does with his new found fortune: what follows is a heady tale of excess and debauchery based on Belfort’s own memoirs.

Despite the more recent financial turmoil, or perhaps because of it, the image of the ‘80s stockbroker has resurfaced for a new generation. Belfort’s story strays into the early ‘90s, but the general aesthetic of the era has the same nostalgic feel, and the messages seem to be the same. Even if we openly loathe bankers, there’s a voyeuristic fascination in watching their decadent lifestyle – or what we imagine such a lifestyle to be like: high stress, fast living, dubious morality and plenty of drugs and sex to boot. The Wolf of Wall Street gives its audience a welcome window into this world.

The story begins when Jordan arrives in the city as a bright eyed, newly qualified broker; having already achieved his youthful dream of working on Wall Street. After an initially unwelcome brief induction into a life of cocaine and lunchtime cocktails by his new boss Mark Hanna (Matthew McConaughey) the rug is pulled out from under his feet, and he soon swaps blue chips for penny stocks, trading shares worth a fraction of a dollar from a Long Island brokerage on a strip mall.

Upon realising that these unlisted stocks can fetch a much higher commission than blue chips, he decides to go into business with a bunch of unscrupulous buddies who know a thing or two about sales, using their silver tongues to make millions by trading them on a massive scale, all the while trying to stay one step ahead of the law. For in truth he is committing outright stock fraud – the details of which are fairly complicated; even Belfort himself chooses not to bore us with the details with his tongue in cheek narration.

The stellar cast is rounded out by players including Jonah Hill, as Belfort’s toothy associate Donnie, Rob Reiner as his complicit accountant father Max Belfort, and Jon Favreau as lawyer Manny Riskin.

The movie treads a thin line between satire and glorification, but Jordan is undoubtedly the hero of the piece, and the FBI agents on his trail the antagonists he must outwit. As an audience, we are invited to his party, and we witness nothing of the effects that Belfort’s deceptions have had on those who were duped into buying his shares – bearing in mind these ‘customers’ are average people parting with their savings, not huge companies dealing in huge sums of money. This disconnection effectively puts us in Belfort’s shoes: much as they must have appeared to him, they are mere voices on the end of a phone.

But Jordan is not portrayed as completely heartless. No matter how large his company grows, swelled with a never-ending number of skilled and promising applicants, his loyal gang of hometown reprobates are never left behind, and maintain high-ranking positions until the end. Even when arrested, and forced to wear a wire by the FBI, he attempts to warn Donnie, rather than let him incriminate himself.

Gratuitous drug use and sexual content aside, the film’s vulgarity can perhaps be summed up by its smashing of the record for the most uses of the f-word in a mainstream non-documentary film, at the rate of around three a minute. The only film scoring higher is a documentary devoted to the word.

Much of the decadence is played for laughs, or at least as a showcase of extravagance, but coupled with the basic shock value of the actions themselves. One memorable sequence sees Belfort snorting cocaine to counteract the effects of a powerful sedative, paralleled with the Popeye cartoon playing on the television in the background.

The film does little to condemn Belfort – although his lifestyle unravels, and he is ultimately incarcerated, any true comeuppance is minimal. This is a reflection of the truth: Belfort’s sentence was just four years, of which he served less than two, which, if the film is to be believed, were in a comfortable minimum security environment for white collar offenders.

These days, he still makes a handsome living as a motivational speaker lecturing on sales technique, and of course, anyone who gets their autobiography made into a Scorsese picture starring Leonardo DiCaprio must have lucked out in the long run.… Expand

0 of 47 users found this helpful047

All this user's reviews

8

AndremaxSep 14, 2018

Martin Scorsese uses to produce biography very well. One of the reasons for it is putting his cinematographic identity even in its kind of film, that requires more compromises with reality than another kind of movies. The Wolf of Wall StreetMartin Scorsese uses to produce biography very well. One of the reasons for it is putting his cinematographic identity even in its kind of film, that requires more compromises with reality than another kind of movies. The Wolf of Wall Street not only has it two ones as is quite funny, even ain't being his best picture of all time.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

2thepointJan 9, 2014

Yes yes, the depictions in the film and majority of the acting was over the top, but that's precisely what it needed to be. How can you expect some boring, dull screenplay and actors to carry on and illustrate the real events that happened?Yes yes, the depictions in the film and majority of the acting was over the top, but that's precisely what it needed to be. How can you expect some boring, dull screenplay and actors to carry on and illustrate the real events that happened? This film is not just about 'corruption' by the way. Not entirely at least; it's mainly about greed. It does not 'glorify' Jordan Belfort; all this film does is portray to the audience how greed tore him and his associates apart, and it stayed true to the book. He starts out poor, and a fairy decent human being at the beginning, and all he wants to do is get ahead. Then once he gets what he wants, he starts to want more and more. This film is about the human condition. We always want more than we need and we will always try to bend the rules to get it. Once currency came in to play there were people being corrupted by it, and that won't change until our species is dead.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

8

eagleeyevikingApr 29, 2014

Overly excessive but wildly entertaining and fun, The Wolf of Wall Street finds Martin Scorcese and all the actors involved at the top of their game.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

Kyfresh1Dec 27, 2013

This is a lot like Django Unchained you will either love it or hate it... You may hate the nudity and the F bomb. To me this is a movie and people need to realize stuff like this happens.. However, Leo gives strongest performance to date.

13 of 20 users found this helpful137

All this user's reviews

8

TJADENZJan 20, 2014

One of the year's best movies thus far, This movie is long but keeps the audience on it's seat. DiCaprio blows away the audience with his gritty, party like, action packed, yet comedic performance. The trailer doesn't give this movie anyOne of the year's best movies thus far, This movie is long but keeps the audience on it's seat. DiCaprio blows away the audience with his gritty, party like, action packed, yet comedic performance. The trailer doesn't give this movie any justice however. Jonah Hill also makes this movie very humorous. A lot of foul mouthed, drug using , hooker renting "penny stock" sellers make it big on a ponzi scheme. There is a lot of foul language which might bother some and the drug use is non stop. Overall a great start to the year in movies with Scorcese flick...hopefully there are more like this. I could see this movie being up for many awards.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

cortynJan 25, 2014

Directed by Martin Scorsese, if The Wolf of Wall Street is a film focusing on the excesses, luxuries, and activities of living a worry-free life. If Wolf would have been made as a drama it might have been unwatchable. There is simply too muchDirected by Martin Scorsese, if The Wolf of Wall Street is a film focusing on the excesses, luxuries, and activities of living a worry-free life. If Wolf would have been made as a drama it might have been unwatchable. There is simply too much of everything happening at an extremely fast pace. However, Scorsese and screenwriter Terence Winter came up with the genius idea to make the movie a comedy. It’s one of the most entertaining films ever created about selfish, repugnant men. Based on the true story of Jordan Belfort, a wealthy stockbroker, The Wolf of Wall Street depicts Belfort’s rise to living an extravagant, frivolous life and his fall into crime, deceit, and corruption.
Leonardo DiCaprio’s performance outdoes all the roles in his entire acting career. This is an excessive film for people who love to indulge in excessive lifestyles. From the opening scene, which features a room filled with coked-up, stockbroker meatheads throwing dwarves at a bull’s-eye, to the scenes of shady financial shenanigans, this fast-paced film is hell-bent on making audiences grit their teeth while sitting in the theater.
To be clear: this is not a family movie. Do not go see it with your parents—unless everyone is prepared for an awkward three hours.
Belfort tried and failed to establish himself on Wall Street in the traditional way under the guidance of an extravagant sleazeball character played by Matthew McConaughey. Belfort was laid off when the stock market crashed in 1987, but he reinvented himself through a small, start-up penny stock company. From here, Belfort was able to give it the name Stratton Oakmont in order to gain the trust of middle- and upper class citizens.
Belfort and his new company specialized in artificially blowing up the value of worthless stocks and selling them to clients for big profits. Shortly after this, the value of the stock dropped dramatically and the investors lost large sums of money. This, however, was how Belfort began to make and build his name on Wall Street—leading to the extravagant lifestyle seen every five minutes throughout the movie. The only thing that matters to Belfort is making one more dollar.
Wolf is one damn thing after another for the full three hours. Once the audience is expecting the characters to lay low for twenty minutes, another binge-drinking, drug-taking, prostitute party takes place. It is a movie about appetites whose own appetite has a desire for compulsive, bottomless pleasure. It’s amazing (and disturbing) to think that the audience can watch this film for the full three hours and still find the characters’ actions to be fascinating and entertaining.
Belfort indulges in just about every crude, sexual, drug-related activity a screenwriter could possibly think to include in a movie. Belfort does it in such an obscene and outrageous way that the audience can’t help but to be completely engulfed by him and his actions throughout the film. Yes, the film pushes the limits of societal morals, and it is geared toward and favored by a higher percentage of men than women, Wolf uses its comedic aspect to engage the audience and make audience members get lost for a few hours in a world completely unlike their own.
There is a tale of Belfort’s excessive greed, lust, and sexuality. However, the film ends with Belfort getting paid to make motivational speeches, which allows him to somehow escape the judgment he otherwise would face.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Longo12Feb 20, 2014

I thought this movie was fantastic! My only complaint was that it was so long be even saying that I was never bored. Entertaining from start to finish. And yet another example of Leo being on of the best actors working today as well asI thought this movie was fantastic! My only complaint was that it was so long be even saying that I was never bored. Entertaining from start to finish. And yet another example of Leo being on of the best actors working today as well as Scorsese being one of the best directors.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

david1997Apr 18, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Martin Scorsese puts out a entertaining dark comical academy award movie. Despite on relying on the drugs and sex of jordan belforst life ..it still provides from great acting peformances and a great sense of humor and enthusiasm to make this movie fun to watch. 85/100… Expand

0 of 15 users found this helpful015

All this user's reviews

8

Christian0205Mar 30, 2014

I love human behavior. And this kind of movies just shows it in his most rough, repugnant way, just like it is. Dicaprio does a really good acting, and the story of excess could not finish in other way (oh humans)

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

lpiedadFeb 2, 2014

Intense performance from the talented actor, Leonardo DiCaprio. Amazing direction from Martin Scorsese. The movie is a bit over the top but still a good movie overall.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

cdnfilmfanJul 11, 2014

This was a surprising film - audacious, satirical but also based on a true story. Martin Scorcese is still at the top of his game and firing on all cylinders. While not always comfortable to watch, this film proceeds at a nice clip and hasThis was a surprising film - audacious, satirical but also based on a true story. Martin Scorcese is still at the top of his game and firing on all cylinders. While not always comfortable to watch, this film proceeds at a nice clip and has some terrific moments.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

OzyApr 2, 2014

What i love about this movie, is it shows us how all our invested money is played with at the highest level of the financial system. Its shocking to be honest. What's more alarming is that you would think people of wisdom, intelligence andWhat i love about this movie, is it shows us how all our invested money is played with at the highest level of the financial system. Its shocking to be honest. What's more alarming is that you would think people of wisdom, intelligence and responsibility would be running the show, only to find out, that they are just a bunch of power hungry go getter's with a 'winniiiinnngg' attitude. Brilliantly told and an absolute must watch! Could have been a little shorter though.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

mcgeetothemaxApr 5, 2014

Scorsese's latest film is an excellent fictional look into the lives of Wall Street Bankers. DiCaprio's character is certainly a role we've never seen him in before and executed perfectly. While this film contains a lot of drugs, nudity,Scorsese's latest film is an excellent fictional look into the lives of Wall Street Bankers. DiCaprio's character is certainly a role we've never seen him in before and executed perfectly. While this film contains a lot of drugs, nudity, and curse words, all are done to represent a bigger theme and convey Scorsese's message overall. While this film may seem a bit long, the story is enveloping and very entertaining to follow.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

LouisForsterApr 6, 2014

I watched this film. It stars Leonardo Di Caprio, Seth Rogans friend, and boobs. It's on for 3 hours.
Summary: Really good. Bit long. Much boobs. 8/10.

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

8

Viper8787Apr 19, 2014

A pretty well acted movie with a few memorable scenes noting to really hype to much over. I think this movie didn't deserve as much praise as it got. There were many good scenes but for it's three hour run time there weren't enough to leaveA pretty well acted movie with a few memorable scenes noting to really hype to much over. I think this movie didn't deserve as much praise as it got. There were many good scenes but for it's three hour run time there weren't enough to leave me wanting more. Leo's acting was good but I still don't thin he deserved the Oscar for best acting so I'm glad he didn't get it.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

8

DrastreApr 29, 2014

The Wolf of Wall Street is a good flick. It's fast paced, entertaing, has a LOT of energy and doesn't stop until the credits roll. It's a very enjoyable flick with lots of style but little substance. I liked it quite a bit.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

BetterOffDead_May 31, 2014

The Wolf Of Wall Street, directed by the great martin scorsese. this movie is about the life of stock worker jordan belfort, what this man goes through is very entertaining and your bound to get some laughs out of this . it really shows whatThe Wolf Of Wall Street, directed by the great martin scorsese. this movie is about the life of stock worker jordan belfort, what this man goes through is very entertaining and your bound to get some laughs out of this . it really shows what success can do to some.. along with drugs and a ton of money! the acting is great by everyone especially the two main stars Leonardo Dicaprio and Jonah Hill. two stars two big personalities. this movie runs for 3 hours and i didn't mind it, its very entertaining and well written, i thought this movie was one of the best movies of the year, defiantly recommend seeing this… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

PorkoMay 25, 2014

A great film which filled me with laughter and excitement. One of Leo's greatest movies. My girlfriend and I agree this movie deserves an 8 out of 10.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

atnairJun 2, 2014

The passion with which DiCaprio enacted the roll of Jordan Belfort is simply amazing. He and the movie deserved the Oscar if Dallas Buyers Club and 12 Years a slave was not there for the competition.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

43in2014Jun 25, 2014

Prior to watching this: I went to see because my friends wanted to.
Review:
Pros: There were some funny bits. The story does draw one in. Cons: Oh! The depravity of this film! Wanton nudity and sex! Leaves a terrible taste in the mouth.Prior to watching this: I went to see because my friends wanted to.
Review:
Pros: There were some funny bits. The story does draw one in.
Cons: Oh! The depravity of this film! Wanton nudity and sex! Leaves a terrible taste in the mouth. Di Caprio was over-acting here, like he usually does, and so was Hill. The whole film seemed over-done.
4/5 - Good enough to pay and watch it in the cinema.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

iCronicJul 11, 2014

Got that fresh Dollar Gold Blu ray Steelbook. On one hand exactly what i expected on the other hand not that masterpiece that many peoply predicted. Get this guy an oscar

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

NotoriousFraudSep 5, 2014

Sex, Drugs, and Stocks. Director Martin Scorsese's "The Wolf Of Wall Street" tells the eccentric yet true story of Jordan Belfort along with his wealth infused, drug addled escapades. In other words, It's complete debauchery from beginning to end.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

vikesh2206Nov 10, 2014

Overly excessive but wildly entertaining and very fun, The Wolf of Wall Street finds Martin Scorcese and all the actors involved at the top of their game.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

ArchonMagazineSep 20, 2014

A beast of a movie, The Wolf of Wall Street, is a monstrous three hour Martin Scorsese creation that is absolutely enthralling and mesmerizing. Jordan Belfort is the repugnant stock broker who ‘steals from the rich and gives to himself’. AnA beast of a movie, The Wolf of Wall Street, is a monstrous three hour Martin Scorsese creation that is absolutely enthralling and mesmerizing. Jordan Belfort is the repugnant stock broker who ‘steals from the rich and gives to himself’. An ostentatious super-rich man dripping in excess, achieved through deceit and fraud, and we follow along on his rise and inevitable fall.

The whole movie is garish, every single wonderful second and screams of Scorsese style. It is not for everyone and certainly not the faint of heart given the prevalence of nudity, sex and drugs (oh, the drugs!). It is loud, bold, and just shy of ludicrous but equally hilarious, anchored by the performances of Leonardo DiCaprio as Jordan Belfort and Jonah Hill, Belfort’s right hand man Donnie Azoff.

It is nominated for five Academy Awards, a sizable number worthy of pride for all those involved. Though, if it doesn’t win for at least one of the categories in which the picture is nominated, given the sheer undertaking of the film, then the whole award show is a sham because it deserves some recognition.

I want to explain why, I want to reference scenes to prove my point, I really do, but if I did I would be spoiling the experience. So just watch it and see.

More reviews of recent releases can be found at our website!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

REDWOUNov 25, 2014

To be honest, I expected worse from this movie. The Wolf of Wall Street wasn't that bad. The only reason this is an 8 is because of the unnecessary nudity and sexual content. It would've been a 10 (probably) without the sex and nudity.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

BlaKDemonaZJan 3, 2015

Filme muito bem feito, com uma aula de interpretação do Leonardo DiCaprio, na minha opinião uma das poucas coisas ruins do filme é a duração. Ele peca em ser muito extenso. Não precisava. Mas, mesmo assim, vale a pena conferir.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

Arthur_S_PoeFeb 11, 2015

Being a Scorsese fan, I can't actually say I disliked the movie or that it's bad. It's not. But, also being a Scorsese fan, I can't say it's even close to his best work or that it's as good as people claim i to be. It is not the movie of theBeing a Scorsese fan, I can't actually say I disliked the movie or that it's bad. It's not. But, also being a Scorsese fan, I can't say it's even close to his best work or that it's as good as people claim i to be. It is not the movie of the decade, not even near and it is certainly not one of the best movies made in the recent years. 'The Wolf of Wall-Street' is a good, or better than your average 'COED party meets money' movie at best, a movie with a set of very strong qualities but also with a set of equally strong weaknesses.

The actors are definitely among the strong sides of the movie. Johan Hill delivered an Oscar-winning performance, showing an ability to add drama to his usually shallow comedy roles, while Leonardo DiCaprio actually did deliver one of the best roles of his career. Exceptionally authentic and strong, DiCaprio actually manages to present the obviously 'over-decorated' story of Jordan Belfort as realistic as possible. He could've lost only to Matt and the 'Dallas Buyers Club' and so he did, but the loss doesn't tarnish the role in any aspect. The technical details are amazing and Scorsese's direction certainly made the film come out strong, despite it's obvious flaws and I'm sure that he is only one of the handful of directors that could've made this movie so good.

As far as the weaknesses go - should I even bother? The movies is certainly too long and should've been at least 30 minutes shorter. At least! The plot line is feeble and full of holes, not to mention quite unbelievable at moments. Some of the scenes were borderline porn and quite unnecessary, leaving the impression that they were filmed in order to gain popularity among the viewers because, well - sex sells. Sadly, doing the film so that the people like it, often means a loss in quality. This movie is a clear example.

The score might be disproportionally high, but 'The Wolf of Wall Street' is really not a bad movie, it's fun, it's dynamic and interesting, with great actors and direction, but there are some essential flaws that keep it on a secure distance from the best ones, which is why I've gotten angry with the commercially oriented people that labeled this film as one of the best they've seen. Despite it's inherent quality, it is far from that standard.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

ZambaFeb 24, 2015

I was a little bit disapointed by the movie. DiCaprio is great, as always, but I felt the movie was exactly what I expected. No surprises. The aggressive-perverted-addicted Wall Street type is a common stereotype. Belfort just multiplies itI was a little bit disapointed by the movie. DiCaprio is great, as always, but I felt the movie was exactly what I expected. No surprises. The aggressive-perverted-addicted Wall Street type is a common stereotype. Belfort just multiplies it ten times. This is no masterpiece, but a very good movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

MrMovieBuffMay 28, 2015

Director Martin Scorsese and his muse, Leonardo DiCaprio are back and are telling the true story of a man named Jordan Belfort in a movie titled 'The Wolf of Wall Street'.

What this movie focuses on is Belfort's (DiCaprio) journey into theDirector Martin Scorsese and his muse, Leonardo DiCaprio are back and are telling the true story of a man named Jordan Belfort in a movie titled 'The Wolf of Wall Street'.

What this movie focuses on is Belfort's (DiCaprio) journey into the world of Wall Street and how he becomes his own businessman running an illegal business, cheating his ignorant customers.

Belfort starts looking for different jobs and begins to get a sense of what it's like to work for the industry, he manages to persuade his customers to trust him and his talents are put to better use when he meets an eager business-inspiring man named Donnie Azoff (Jonah Hill). The two men hit it off together, discussing what they aspire to do and how to get there, and it's there that Jordan is introduced to smoking pot and consuming other heavy amounts of drugs.

After they kick-start their business and become established, Jordan then meets a woman named Naomi (Margot Robbie) and they buy an apartment together and quickly get married and get their lives settled.

There are many cameos in this movie from Matthew McConaughey, to Jon Favreau and Spike Jonze. But then there's Rob Reiner, who plays the father, Max Belfort in a performance so crazy and so obnoxious, he should've been considered for some awards for his role.

DiCaprio gives us one of his most charismatic performances since Steven Spielberg's 'Catch Me If You Can' (2002), here, he gives us some physical comedy and it is surprisingly funny. Jonah Hill shares fantastic chemistry with him as the over-the-top sidekick. The two actors clearly have fun in their roles which is great to see.

Martin Scorsese tells this story in a 3 hour movie, which is one main problem I have. I have seen many movies that are longer than three hours, ('Schindler's List', 'Titanic' and 'The Lord of the Rings'), but this movie has scenes that drag on for longer than ten minutes, even if it's a jokey scene, we get the punchline, but it still goes on for a few more minutes. I do not think that the infamous story of Jordan Belfort and how he cheated his way through Wall Street needed to be told in three hours, but the movie's enigma and entertaining scenes do keep you intrigued and you find yourself glued to the movie despite its vulgarity.

This movie is full of cold-hearted characters, drugs, filthy language, and many scenes of sex and graphic nudity. It's not for everyone and I can understand if one was to be offended with the movie's content. It can be a lot t handle for three hours, but once you get into the story, you'll be entertained.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

BitashMar 29, 2020

Well written and acted, there is no weak link in this movie.
People who gave it thumbs down didn’t like the nudity and language which is what makes the movie! Plus it’s based on real events This movie is super funny and interesting from minWell written and acted, there is no weak link in this movie.
People who gave it thumbs down didn’t like the nudity and language which is what makes the movie! Plus it’s based on real events This movie is super funny and interesting from min one. I have watched it several times, each time it’s on tv I leave it so I can rewatch the funny scenes which there are many. Leo is just superb in this movie and very believable. Performance of a lifetime. Just loved this movie… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeFeb 15, 2016

The Wolf of Wall Street manages to keep such a good movie at the theaters after seeing some of the movies 2013 has managed to get us. We know what to not count and what to count in this list.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

JumpmanJan 6, 2016

This movie is very entertaining , i could watch for another three hours. Leonardo Di Caprio's acting is good but not as good as everyone claims it to be.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

AaronWasserman1Mar 26, 2016

When I first saw previews for this movie I was so uninterested. However, I really enjoyed it. It was a well written, acted, and directed movie. Leo definitely shines in this movie.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

EgeBerkOct 4, 2018

Found the beginning of the film a little mixed.ok the stock market world is in a very fast and mixed world, I tried to reflect it in the film but it came to me too complicated yet.
I couldn't focus very well on some scenes.
The only negativeFound the beginning of the film a little mixed.ok the stock market world is in a very fast and mixed world, I tried to reflect it in the film but it came to me too complicated yet.
I couldn't focus very well on some scenes.

The only negative idea for the movie is that it has to be complicated in all its exceptions that have been transferred to the audience as well as everything else should be very well selected not only the very best players in the background but each player has done his job very well in the background.

When I watched the film, I didn't know it was from a real story or even a real person.
I would like to say without saying a lot of the film is very nice I was already nominated for the academy award at the same time the imdb 250 has succeeded in entering the list, ie, both critics and audiences have managed to take the note was nice.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

RalphKellyJul 29, 2019

Slightly overrated in my opinion but it could be because the subject matter didn’t hold much interest for me. Based on the real-life antics of Jordan Belfont Wolf of Wall Street is a well-paced, but overlong biography of a man who cheated andSlightly overrated in my opinion but it could be because the subject matter didn’t hold much interest for me. Based on the real-life antics of Jordan Belfont Wolf of Wall Street is a well-paced, but overlong biography of a man who cheated and scammed his way before paying the price. Leonardo Di Caprio-a Scorsese regular now is great as the main character although its not a stretch by any means. Margot Robbie looks great although she has a thankless role. Jonah Hill and others make up Belfont's crazy colleagues and more than provide a few laugh out moments. Scorsese is branching even to this day and it is great to see the legend still at it, although I'd have preferred a better subject. Regardless, for fans of Scorsese and Leo The Wolf of Wall Street is a great film.Good Scorsese movie based on real life events… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

glommanNov 1, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie shows that Martin Scorsese can also direct good movies, when he doesn't focus on Mafia themes. There's no real good or bad in this one, it's just the story of how an incredibly greedy man with the help of his wife, friend(s), and a **** of cocaine got rich and lost it all in the end, and I absolutely loved every second of it, especially the scene, where he overdoses on illegal chemicals is absolutely golden on its own.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

TheEventsOf1989Jan 12, 2020

"The Wolf of Wall Street" is probably the best example of a script's responsibility to its tone. Its over-the-top style is perfectly executed, and very purposeful. The big issue that critics had was that the film doesn't have any compelling"The Wolf of Wall Street" is probably the best example of a script's responsibility to its tone. Its over-the-top style is perfectly executed, and very purposeful. The big issue that critics had was that the film doesn't have any compelling characters. To me that always seemed to be the point. And actually, the audience doesn't technically have to be compelled by a movies characters. However, they do have to understand why the characters do what they do. In fact, most of the characters in the film start off as very compelling, the other side of their arch is when they turn into outrageous pigs.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

GarrusIsBeastJun 18, 2020

Although it may be 3 hour long "crazy" movie, Scorsese sure does make a wonderful masterpiece with its comedic scenes, the use of language, Leonardo DiCaprio's acting, and editing.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

DarthNookDec 23, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As an investment man myself, I find Wolf of Wallstreet extremely disrespectful to day traders. And that’s why I love this movie. You see, unlike other movies which require extensive knowledge of the stock market to really fully enjoy, Wolf Of Wallstreet is a tale of drugs, sex and honour (except that last part). And everyone loves drugs and sex (this is purely hypothetical mom). First, the characters of WOW are so vibrant. I constantly find myself laughing at their adorably hilarious moments, snorting white powder, doing the devils tangle and most of the time both. And the rich problems they face are just so stupid in nature that it makes the film so entertaining. Laundering money (clearly never heard of Crown Casino), cheating on their wives without them knowing, having an hour minute delay before the lemons kick in, these characters are just stupid fun. They are also emotional though. We see a drug fuelled Jorden tear his family apart when faced with losing his child and wife, when faced with death, Jorden wants to die on drugs – we even see him try to save his closest friend Donnie by alerting him that he was wired when snitching to the feds. That said, Wolf of Wall Street’ story is good but nothing revolutionary. Basing itself of Jorden Belfort’s time, manipulating the stock market and running a penny stock scam, it’s clear to any investment orientated person that WOW is not a movie directly about that. It’s sensationalised. You’re not going to learn anything about stocks, other than how corrupt the big players on wall street can be. The Story is complete though with an ending that has reasonable closure and couldn’t have been done a lot better. When it comes to cinematography, the movie doesn’t do anything too special. There are no crazy pan shots, nothing too high tech. They do a decent job of the huge orgy scenes and special effects when the characters are taking drugs. Other then that, they maybe could have done a bit more in the boat scene and used more expensive shots to really sell that multi, multi-millionaire feeling.
Overall definitely a favourite movie of mine but from a critical perspective probably about a 7-8, as while in terms of purely technical aspects, it’s really like a 6, it gains some points for being entertaining and highly pop cultural.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

It is just so so so funny, almost every dialogue will make you smile. Even though being a bit long, watching it will make you feel anything but boredom. Leo DiCaprio is MARVELLOUS

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Rudey21Sep 18, 2021

hjhgjhgjhgjnhgngfhnyhtfnyfhnbytfbyrftyhbyrfhthvrthvrtvtvfdgh hdhththgdgfggf

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JimmyReviewsMar 16, 2023

8.2

The way this film has been treated in the public eye is nothing short of fascinating. In this climate you seldom find a film so neutral. I do not believe this film normalizes the actions taken by its protagonists nor does it condemn8.2

The way this film has been treated in the public eye is nothing short of fascinating. In this climate you seldom find a film so neutral. I do not believe this film normalizes the actions taken by its protagonists nor does it condemn them. It simply lets them exist. This neutrality and rawness to everything it portrays is easily what makes the beauty of the film. In my opinion, you need to have that mindset about the title to really experience it as it is.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AxlKssJul 24, 2023

Just Martin Scorsese, goooooooooddaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmm!!!!!
And Leonardo DiCaprio

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BKMFeb 11, 2014

Martin Scorsese takes a sledgehammer approach to this over the top indictment of Wall Street by presenting three hours worth of sex, drugs, booze, greed and generally repulsive behavior. It's never a boring viewing experience, but it's notMartin Scorsese takes a sledgehammer approach to this over the top indictment of Wall Street by presenting three hours worth of sex, drugs, booze, greed and generally repulsive behavior. It's never a boring viewing experience, but it's not exactly saying anything new or insightful either. The Wolf and his minions have no moral center and no souls to boot. Welcome to the new American dream.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

tonyGreenJan 10, 2014

The drama works much better than the comedy. Perhaps that's because the characters are so unlikeable. There are some are great individual scenes however it does seem too long. At ~180 mins I guess it is pretty good value for money, andThe drama works much better than the comedy. Perhaps that's because the characters are so unlikeable. There are some are great individual scenes however it does seem too long. At ~180 mins I guess it is pretty good value for money, and manages to maintain the attention. Perhaps the fascination of watching bad behavior.

I really couldn't stand stand the jukebox soundtrack. Here's a scene, here's a massive chart hit that has a very literal connection to the subject of that scene. Paramount spent a small fortune licensing the use of the track. Here's 30 seconds or less, enjoy. FM Radio could learn a new trick.

Finally I have to say, Jordan Belfort isn't a cool dude Martin, or even an antihero Martin. He's just a prick that had an interesting life.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

7

RattrapJan 23, 2014

If you are seduced by this movie, chances are you haven't seen the superior Casino, which tells a similar story in much more interesting ways. A few scenes in WoWS are genuinely funny (Leo crawling on Q's) but things like the plane orgy feelIf you are seduced by this movie, chances are you haven't seen the superior Casino, which tells a similar story in much more interesting ways. A few scenes in WoWS are genuinely funny (Leo crawling on Q's) but things like the plane orgy feel diluted and tacked on. The screenplay isn't particularly clever or thought-provoking - Monahan's Departed script, it is not. Sex scenes feel as cheap as the characters - the only redeemable quality to them is the visual sight of beautiful Margot Robbie - but pretty much all the other women in this film are set pieces for debauchery.

That said, the energy here is authentic Scorcese, and although there's little dramatic interest, it's fairly enjoyable on a level of spectacle. No one else is making films like this. Who else can present this material in such a confident, cock-sure manner? I did enjoy the film, but next time, I hope Scorcese can show us something new.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Just1nsaneJan 1, 2014

First the biggest mistake was to make this movie 3 hours long. Martin you dont need that much character development to bore us to death. I cant remember how many times I had to look at my clock. Second thing is I understand the sarcasm isFirst the biggest mistake was to make this movie 3 hours long. Martin you dont need that much character development to bore us to death. I cant remember how many times I had to look at my clock. Second thing is I understand the sarcasm is what made this movie funny but it made it worse Jonah Hill made this movie in my point of view he was hilarious. Leonardo was good but he went over the top at times and it became kinda dull.… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

7

MikefromAngusJun 4, 2014

Watching the movie, I wasn't offended. It was interesting 75% of the time. but... It just didn't grab my total interest like some movies do. the movie was well acted and directed. but it just didn't do it for me.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

KarlthecatJan 16, 2014

Martin Scorsese is really good at making you like terrible people (Goodfellas). By far the best scenes in The Wolf of Wall Street are when Leonardo DiCaprio makes his speeches, I’m growing to like him more.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

7

quincytheodoreJan 28, 2014

More than a cult or circus than white collar con one might expect, The Wolf of Wall Street is littered with endless profanity, excessive drug abuse and possibly censored fornication, and quite delightfully so. The movie sometimes usesMore than a cult or circus than white collar con one might expect, The Wolf of Wall Street is littered with endless profanity, excessive drug abuse and possibly censored fornication, and quite delightfully so. The movie sometimes uses sarcastic tone in light of its depravity, but occasionally turns rather dark on the almost veneered anti-heroes as they rise and fall by the riches. Acting is undeniably superb, especially from the lead Leonardo DiCaprio, it keeps the long movie, in which hours spent getting high on various substances, entertaining.

Story revolves around Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his motley crew as they strive for opulence in expense of everyone else. It's a very crude display of alcoholism and addiction, Belfort is often seen bragging of his own compulsion and the cast is portrayed high for majority of the movie. This is supposed to be satiric as the downfall eventually comes preceded by uncanny signs of mental decline, but the amount of exposure to substance consumption is staggering. This is also the case with the use of expletive; the movie has delivered words that are usually bleeped in spade. It's safe to say that it's been a long time a cinema movie spams such generous amount of profanity.

The whimsical focus does attract attention; it's more relatable with realistic, albeit harsh approach. Martin Scorsese is a master of the trade, he makes such gritty black comedy and the scenes, even though corrupted, have lively charm in them. It also sports more humor than most of his works. Leonardo DiCaprio brings a top notch performance; he has done everything that could be asked of him, perhaps more. At times he looks like a raging preacher driven by wealth, other times he drools uncontrollably in his inebriated state, making audience wonder if he's actually under influence.

Some of the better moments come as DiCaprio narrates them as Belfort. It's pretty insightful to the character and practically how a person would normally react. Cast does decent job, but aside Jonah Hill as Belfort's sloppy right hand, the rest of the firm is a bit one dimensional, amplified by the everlasting plague of being stoned to death. Margot Robbie as the love interest and sex icon is admittedly gorgeous; she brings a pint of silliness, but gives a quality performance on latter scenes.

The movie's three hours span is overly lengthy; I believe there are some debauchery acts that could be reduced, for repetition of people merrily intoxicated may overstay its welcome. For a comedy, it does provide some great chuckles along the way. Script and screenplay are certainly good, but it lacks the layers of deception, and substitutes or even ignores complex trickery with abundance of drug usage and sexual indulgence.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

geedupJan 13, 2014

I was incredibly interested in this film. I actually paid attention to the hype and the obvious departure for Leo in this film. The story was interesting but could have been told/shown in 45 minutes as the other 45 minutes of this film isI was incredibly interested in this film. I actually paid attention to the hype and the obvious departure for Leo in this film. The story was interesting but could have been told/shown in 45 minutes as the other 45 minutes of this film is swearing and pure demonstration of over indulgence. Drugs, women, degeneration......these things we have seen in other films. And I understand these aspects are key to the story...but HALF the film? Scorsace's camera makes for an entertaining views.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

StaticSpineMay 4, 2014

The story is interesting, but I didn't expect Scorsese to film an epic 3 hour long comedy about drugs and sex. I mean I love the actors and the filming, but I do not dig the whole concept of the movie, I'd rather like it as a more seriousThe story is interesting, but I didn't expect Scorsese to film an epic 3 hour long comedy about drugs and sex. I mean I love the actors and the filming, but I do not dig the whole concept of the movie, I'd rather like it as a more serious movie, which are Scorsese's finest.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

JamesCannonDec 28, 2013

And you thought the bikini carwash saga was over the top!? Mediocre Scorcese, but still manages to rise above average. It is filmed more as a high octane comedy of hedonistic pleasures and Belfort cult personality that propels everythingAnd you thought the bikini carwash saga was over the top!? Mediocre Scorcese, but still manages to rise above average. It is filmed more as a high octane comedy of hedonistic pleasures and Belfort cult personality that propels everything forward. I thought Jonah Hill was actually funny in this and him Dicaprio have some funny scenes together. A couple funny scenes and few good Scorcese moments isnt really enough to hold an entire 3 hour movie about a self centered stock broker/swindler. It isnt really Dicaprio's fault or any other actors fault, the movie for me just doesnt have that compelling pull. I can only watch someone snort a line, smoke crack, screw a hooker, till he finally realizes its all going to come down (well somewhat). I enjoyed for what it was, the Animal House/Brokerage Firm and the rise and fall of a man who could sell anything and rev up his sales team as well.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

7

VinceMDec 27, 2013

This is NOT a film for everyone. Yes, it is morally bankrupt even though the good guys win in the very drawn out ending. But it's a wild and often hilarious ride to get to that end. DiCaprio show a huge range as he vividly displays hisThis is NOT a film for everyone. Yes, it is morally bankrupt even though the good guys win in the very drawn out ending. But it's a wild and often hilarious ride to get to that end. DiCaprio show a huge range as he vividly displays his skills. However, it seemed he was over-acting on many occasions. The result was a very primitive form of entertainment. And, yes, women were badly stereo-typed and exploited as passive sex objects for the overly aggressive and greedy men.… Expand

0 of 15 users found this helpful015

All this user's reviews

7

python2000Feb 10, 2014

This is definitely not Martin Scorsese's most sophisticated movie and also far from the best. But I had a very good time when watching it and was consistently entertained. All of the cast give good performances, Leonardo Di Caprio especiallyThis is definitely not Martin Scorsese's most sophisticated movie and also far from the best. But I had a very good time when watching it and was consistently entertained. All of the cast give good performances, Leonardo Di Caprio especially as the central character Jordan Belfort AKA the Wolf of Wall Street, and Jonah Hill is surprisingly good in one of his first non comedic roles. However the main and most obvious reason why The Wolf of Wall Street is so entertaining is because of how outlandish and crazy close to every scene is. In places you almost forget that it's based on true events. From the immature conversation between Belfort and his mentor, played brilliantly by Matthew McConaughey, to the hilarious but quite juvenile night where Di Caprio and Hill get the strongest high known to man, it is ridiculously entertaining. And also worryingly enjoyable due to the extreme amount of sex, nudity, violence and drugs much like the far wittier 2013 movie Don Jon. Overall The Wolf of Wall Street will keep you interested through its whole runtime despite it being 3 hours long, but may repel some more sensitive viewers due to its mature content.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

wisertimeApr 7, 2014

I found this movie enjoyable, despite some of the objections I read going into it. Felt it was very well done, even with some unbelievable parts in it, though they did not detract from it overall. Leonardo was great in his role. DirectingI found this movie enjoyable, despite some of the objections I read going into it. Felt it was very well done, even with some unbelievable parts in it, though they did not detract from it overall. Leonardo was great in his role. Directing was great. I hate Jonah Hill, but he was good, I admit. It had funny bits as well. Clever storytelling. The nudity and sex was way less than what I was lead to believe by the prudes.

I give the edge to American Hustle as the more enjoyable picture, and plot by a little. Gravity isn't even in the same league (that was a total POS). Having just seen Grand Budapest, I am grateful we still have Scorcese to show how movies should be made, even though it's not his best work....it's still good.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

TheApplegnomeNov 16, 2014

Hell yeah. Now this is what I call a wild and crazy film!

I really had a great time watching this film; it's fun and crazy at the same time. I even laughed out because it got some damn great things that I totally enjoyed to watch. The WolfHell yeah. Now this is what I call a wild and crazy film!

I really had a great time watching this film; it's fun and crazy at the same time. I even laughed out because it got some damn great things that I totally enjoyed to watch. The Wolf of Wall Street truly got me of guard; I didn't expect this film to be so realistic and incredible. I even felt a bit emotional, because some of the events in the film truly illustrate how life can be; it can be fun but also terrible. Leonardo DiCaprio as Jordan Belfort is flawless, and the main cast are incredible. This in combination with a great story results in a fantastic and realistic film, but it got some downsides. One thing is that the second part of the film is less funny, and the tempo is also a bit slower. The movie overall could have had even more entertaining things, it could have resulted in a higher grade from my perspective! The last thing is the ending, there's nothing wrong about it but it could have been more exiting or thrilling maybe.

The Wolf of Wall Street is a **** wild film, and I really recommend everyone to see it!

The Wolf of Wall Street gets a 7.5/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

LowbrowCinemaJan 22, 2014

Ambitious, wild and uneven, WOLF OF WALL STREET is at least an hour too long with scenes that seem endless especially one very unfunny scene with a telephone cord. But WOLF is also deliciously crude and dirty. WOLF brazenly depicts just howAmbitious, wild and uneven, WOLF OF WALL STREET is at least an hour too long with scenes that seem endless especially one very unfunny scene with a telephone cord. But WOLF is also deliciously crude and dirty. WOLF brazenly depicts just how vulgar and bland our culture is all at the same time. These horrible guys aren't even creative enough to have truly obsessive, inventive or obscene fantasies. Everything is banal and hackneyed. Not as pointed as it wants to be, WOLF is still a terrific spit in the face of our despicable age.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

ADM21Jan 24, 2014

I'm a big fan of Martin Scorsese and Leonardo Di Caprio, so naturally i was always going to see it. Overall, it didn't disappoint. It was smart, funny, and well acted and was quite enjoyable to watch. Admittedly, it was a little long at 3I'm a big fan of Martin Scorsese and Leonardo Di Caprio, so naturally i was always going to see it. Overall, it didn't disappoint. It was smart, funny, and well acted and was quite enjoyable to watch. Admittedly, it was a little long at 3 hours, i think 20 or 30 minutes probably could have been easily edited out without having any profound impact on the plot or themes in it, but its certainly still worth watching.

Oh and for those people who were disgusted and offended by it (some of you even walked out), you get no sympathy from me. The film received an R rating, and it did so for a reason. Maybe next time read why it was rated as such before you walk into the cinema, would have saved yourself a lot of time.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

7

michaeltranDec 25, 2013

It's just a good film but not great! This film is funny and very sexy. Leo's performance is always good. But is it too long I love Martin Scorsese ,who is great director of great films and i expect a special comeback from him. But it's notIt's just a good film but not great! This film is funny and very sexy. Leo's performance is always good. But is it too long I love Martin Scorsese ,who is great director of great films and i expect a special comeback from him. But it's not enough for me. However it's still a good film to watch.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

7

RunicDragonsFeb 5, 2014

I went to the theaters to see this movie with my friend the other day. It's a good movie, and the acting was brilliant, especially Leonardo, which usually delivers with his strong performance.
The issue I had with this movie, however, isI went to the theaters to see this movie with my friend the other day. It's a good movie, and the acting was brilliant, especially Leonardo, which usually delivers with his strong performance.
The issue I had with this movie, however, is that it is too long, there's way too many sex/drug scenes than necessary, and swears are said in every damn sentence.

I do feel like this movie is a little overrated, and in my opinion, Martin's best film is still The Departed.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

aGUYtoREMEMBERJan 2, 2014

Nice way of showing something that is:
-corrupt
-fake
-thieving
-lying
-manipulating
-etc

overall it is not great but DiCaprio does a really good job in the moive

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

poewilsonFeb 6, 2014

Scorsese does what Scorese does best. He approaches his pieces with out a filter and this concept has almost always worked for him, however in trying to allow the viewer to see the type of sleaze that comes from wall street, he has achievedScorsese does what Scorese does best. He approaches his pieces with out a filter and this concept has almost always worked for him, however in trying to allow the viewer to see the type of sleaze that comes from wall street, he has achieved his goal but in that same fragile second repulsed the viewer in such away that they end up demonizing the film instead of the characters with in.
DiCaprio gives a standard performance, but offers nothing new. Jonah Hill's performance proves he is growing even if the character he is forced to portray is two dimensional.
The poe scale:
Acting: 1.5/2
Cinematography: 1.5/2
Editing: 1.5/2
Effects and Design 1.5/2
Writing: 1/2… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

KayakMar 3, 2014

Great acting, great dialogue and some hilarious scenes. There are a few issues which drag it down slightly for me though. I do find Belfort's inclusion as a cameo a bit unnecessary and that does make me question the integrity and moralGreat acting, great dialogue and some hilarious scenes. There are a few issues which drag it down slightly for me though. I do find Belfort's inclusion as a cameo a bit unnecessary and that does make me question the integrity and moral implications of the film. I also switched off now and again in some sections, making me think it dragged slightly and certain scenes could have been left out. That being said, i did still love it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

pr211013Apr 16, 2014

The Wolf of Wall Street was excellent in aspects of story and structure. The acting was great, which is to be expected with stars, such as Leonardo DiCaprio and Jonah Hill. These actors truly outdid themselves in their respective roles.The Wolf of Wall Street was excellent in aspects of story and structure. The acting was great, which is to be expected with stars, such as Leonardo DiCaprio and Jonah Hill. These actors truly outdid themselves in their respective roles. Unfortunately, the one big problem with the movie is that it was far too long. Some of the speech scenes should have been cut shorter and although the drug-induced stupors were comical they too lasted too long. All in all, the film was great but I was ready for it to be over before it was.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

inaneswineNov 14, 2017

Featuring some great performance and full of laughs, 'Wolf' is a smart and thought-provoking insight into the chaotic lives of those who live by the dollar.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

7

BeingNickDohNov 19, 2015

The review of echoplex01 made me remember how I often I do not look for the ways women are depicted in movies... It is a normative in Holly Wood to make women weak and fragile, and usually sex objects.

However, as for story telling,The review of echoplex01 made me remember how I often I do not look for the ways women are depicted in movies... It is a normative in Holly Wood to make women weak and fragile, and usually sex objects.

However, as for story telling, humor, truth, and a great insight of an American institution (Wall Street) that gives a pretty honest look at how the greedy stay greedy until they either plateau or fall.

While thoroughly entertaining, I cannot give more than a 7 because of the reality that will follow this movie... that more will think "I want to be rich too" after watching it, rather than "being rich doesn't buy happiness." A movie to further put the wasteful mentalities of Americans further and further into the void.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

SrPepeAug 26, 2018

Esta película es muy bizarra y parece hecha por Adam Sandler, sin embargo la gente la ama. A mi no me disgusto, pero tampoco me pareció la gran cosa, dura muchísimo y es bastante repugnante. Tiene una gran producción y unos excelentes actores.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

HatersWannaHateOct 3, 2016

This movie starts off great, and you will think it is another Scorsese classic, until it goes on about 45 minutes too long. It must be said that Margot Robbie is way too hot. This film and Moneyball establish Jonah Hill as a good actor.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

RobertWangOct 31, 2018

The Wolf of Wall Street is fun, though maybe just a little bit too long. DiCaprio with yet another fantastic lead performance that we've grown accostumed to.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

harshsbMar 3, 2019

The Wolf of Wall Street exemplifies the high-speed, drug-fueled, party culture of wall street stock brokers, through the true dramatized story of Jordan Belfort, the founder of a penny-stock brokerage which operated illegally through pump andThe Wolf of Wall Street exemplifies the high-speed, drug-fueled, party culture of wall street stock brokers, through the true dramatized story of Jordan Belfort, the founder of a penny-stock brokerage which operated illegally through pump and dump schemes. Leonardo Da Vinci plays his role exceedingly well, and overall the movie is well-written and well-shot. There are great elements of comedy, the movie is clever, witty and filthy. Martin Scorsese did great with camerawork but the overall pacing of this movie seems very drawn out and at times it feels like it was made longer than it had to be, but with an intelligently written plot and great characters, The Wolf of Wall Street is solid all-around.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

loremMar 29, 2020

An extremely well constructed and executed movie, but a bit too "noisy" and sometimes exaggerated, far from Scorsese's well-known genius.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

killdrphilMar 20, 2014

Very shallow movie. With a very simplistic, tiresome plot. If you can call it a plot that is. Guy does illegal things, makes a lot of money, lives in debauchery. FBI catches on and then eventually strikes a deal with him. That's basically it.Very shallow movie. With a very simplistic, tiresome plot. If you can call it a plot that is. Guy does illegal things, makes a lot of money, lives in debauchery. FBI catches on and then eventually strikes a deal with him. That's basically it. Other than Dicaprio's performance and a few funny scenes, there isn't much to recommend here. One would think Scorcese and Dicaprio would want to aim higher at this point in their careers.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

LokathorApr 26, 2014

Moderately well off guy becomes a total sleeze bag and becomes a filthy rich degenerate. Then he goes too far and ends up not being as filthy rich by the end. I wouldn't mind the story, except that degenerate sleezebag wallstreet execs aren'tModerately well off guy becomes a total sleeze bag and becomes a filthy rich degenerate. Then he goes too far and ends up not being as filthy rich by the end. I wouldn't mind the story, except that degenerate sleezebag wallstreet execs aren't actually caught so often in real life, so that's always a damn shame.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

captaindangerJan 26, 2014

Entertaining while you're watching it, but afterwards you ask yourself "Why the **** did I watch this movie?" Unrewarding, and all of the characters are dicks.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

JawsLaxerDramaDec 31, 2013

The Wolf of Wall Steet is an outrageous, twisted, entertaining and devious film. Many say there is a glorification of sex, drugs and greed that is wrapped so tightly in the film that every five minutes there is a sex scene at a X rated level.The Wolf of Wall Steet is an outrageous, twisted, entertaining and devious film. Many say there is a glorification of sex, drugs and greed that is wrapped so tightly in the film that every five minutes there is a sex scene at a X rated level. I didn't mind, because that is how our super star, Leo Dicaprio plays with a delicious appetite. Every other word may be and at times, I wanted to leave because after 300 uses of ****ing---it loses emphasis. (506 f u c k uses) There is an important message here. The moral errosion, the twisted deceit and the overwhelming lack of a solid plot, this is what is out there in the world. Especially in the US. Now, as for my rating of six, I did not love the movie. I thought it had its pros and cons. For starters, cut the sex scenes down, trim down the use of f u c k (which I am not offended by, but it definitely loses emphasis) and show if Belfort was in any way full of remorse. The second half of the picture is better, gaining personal ground and...well,the whole point was to share this ridiculous story, to batter our minds with a genuine question of "why?". My feelings are somewhat mixed. Some scenes are too long when you get th point, entertaining here and there, and it never fails to show you. I am not a prude. I just think it went over the top, which is what is should have done, but there is something about WOWS that I couldn't connect to. If you're debating whether or not to see it, please do. There is a lot of mixed reaction on here, and especially in the theatre. Cheers.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

stoknyJan 22, 2014

I am in general a fan of Scorsese movies, and Leo is also one of my favorite actors so I really wanted to like this movie but honestly it just wasn't that great. Granted, there were some very funny moments but most of it just seemed to dragI am in general a fan of Scorsese movies, and Leo is also one of my favorite actors so I really wanted to like this movie but honestly it just wasn't that great. Granted, there were some very funny moments but most of it just seemed to drag on aimlessly for hours. They do not even really explain what is going on plot wise or what they are really doing. They make mention of several loose themes but pretty much the entire movie is just a bunch of rich d-bags doing drugs, having sex, and making fun of each other. It's okay for a while but just got old to me.… Expand

2 of 58 users found this helpful256

All this user's reviews

6

StevieB212Dec 26, 2013

I saw the trailers. I was all in. The movies was going to be bigger than life: ride the tail of a major swindler, see what life was like among the obscenely rich and luxurious. The film is uneven: it's bigger than life, but it's also sadI saw the trailers. I was all in. The movies was going to be bigger than life: ride the tail of a major swindler, see what life was like among the obscenely rich and luxurious. The film is uneven: it's bigger than life, but it's also sad and painful to watch, and it's also funny. There's lots of great scenes, but it just doesn't hang together. I was willing to bet on a winner by Scorsese. Lots of amazing performances. Leonardo DiCaprio has never been better. He's in great shape. At times, he reminded me of a young Jack Nicholson. Jonah Hill is great, and steady through out. Some wonderful small gems of parts played by Matthew McConaughey, (who doesn't seem fully recovered from the Dallas Buyers Club), Rob Reiner, Joanna Lumley and the French handsome leading man, Jean Dujardin. The film made me feel as though I'd been taken for a ride, and it's too long ride at that, at 3 hours.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

6

TheRealMcLeanJan 27, 2014

An overall fantastic film, that is ruined by moments of needless, over the top excess, that seems to steal the viewer away from the mostly excellent plot. Despite these moments, which mostly come towards the end of the film, (where it mainlyAn overall fantastic film, that is ruined by moments of needless, over the top excess, that seems to steal the viewer away from the mostly excellent plot. Despite these moments, which mostly come towards the end of the film, (where it mainly seems to fall apart and feel like the film never really decided upon its ending, resulting in a jumble of in effective twists and hollow moments), in most aspects, bar DiCaprio. DiCaprio never lets his role down once in the entire three hours and executes each scene perfectly. This film seems like a playground for DiCaprio to prove all he can to achieve that seriously deserved Oscar. For any issue there is with this film, Leo is not to blame and it is for him alone that this film will forever remain very memorable.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

zouz123Apr 16, 2014

Apart from its boring sex and drugs scenes, it has some good moments. But overall, the movie is waaay overrated and boring. We've seen it all, done it all, and more...

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

kenbramerApr 30, 2014

The Wolf of Wall Street had a lot of potential but it proved to be simply too long and too wannabe. Martin Scorsese is known for making films to this length, but this didn't work the way Gangs of New York or The Departed did. First of all,The Wolf of Wall Street had a lot of potential but it proved to be simply too long and too wannabe. Martin Scorsese is known for making films to this length, but this didn't work the way Gangs of New York or The Departed did. First of all, Leonardo DiCaprio is the main actor and narrator, and once you get used to his character's sense of humor, it becomes recycled and boring. It almost seems as though he is trying too hard to represent the wolf that was stock-market giant Jordan Belfort. The movie is an overly-exaggerated version of the actual over-exaggerated life of a scumbag whose only interest was having a lot of fun and even more money.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

borderlinefilmsFeb 5, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Voracious Bull

Every time I try to enjoy a Martin Scorcese movie post-1980 I ask myself what made Raging Bull so great? Did Marty burn out after his Jake LaMotta bio, the same way Coppola did after Apocalypse Now? These were risky movies, driven by passion, bordering on madness. Did Marty and Francis lose their natural passion for making films because industry priorities dismissed 70's-style hyper-realism for sensational summer blockbusters and CGI spectacles? And why is Scorcese considered one of the greatest director when he really only made one truly superb movie?

When I first saw Raging Bull in 1980 I immediately knew I was watching something that transcended the typical cinematic experience. Genius was shimmering out of every perforated frame flickering on the screen. Paul, Marty, Bobby, Mike and Thelma created something that was completely absorbing. The style and substance was perfectly fueled by a flawless emotional narrative. Every element was orchestrated just right. The audience was spellbound. We were watching greatness. A rare and unique organic creation. I'm still waiting for Robert Redford to correct a travesty of justice and hand his Ocscar over to it's rightful owner. And I'm still waiting for Scorcese to match his own brilliance. But that's like expecting Tarantino to top Pulp Fiction. There's a better chance Orson Welles rises up from the dead to one up Citizen Kane.

After Raging Bull, Scorcese has made a string of pictures ranging from not bad to pretty good. All well-made, thoughtful and meticulously crafted films, but nothing special; certainly nothing profound. Contrary to popular opinion, Goodfellas is not a great movie. I was not swept away by the saga. I was annoyed rather by the fragmented non-stop soundtrack and incessant up-tempo style. Marty wasn't risking anything anymore. He seemed to be afraid of boring the audience. Perhaps he was trying to revive the 1940's never-let-up screwball-bouncing farcical Preston Sturges and co. comedies. But this is a mafia film. This should have been right up Marty's alley. It's been almost a quarter of a century since De Niro got his face busted in a boxing ring. Since the raw, robust and naive will-power of LaMotta's youth plunged into the pathetic, brutal, bone-headed stupidity of his later years. Similarly, Scorsese hasn't registered a knock-out punch since. Would his ensuing movies be considered great if someone else directed them? Would I have liked them all better if Raging Bull had never been made?

The Wolf of Wall Street is another exhausting affair. It tries too hard to excite and entertain us. It's afraid of slowing down, allowing us to ponder or examine the complexities of excessive greed, shameless wealth and unbridled capitalism. It desperately wants to arouse us. Like a neglected clown at a child's birthday trying to be loved and taken seriously while draining the life out of the party. Give Leo and Jonah an "A" for effort. They couldn't have tried harder if they broke out into song and dance every ten minutes. And they convincingly appeared to enjoy themselves freely indulging in coke, ludes and naked women every five minutes. It was nice of Leo to step back while Margot Robbie took her routine and obligatory, supporting-actress hissy fit. And you know a filmmaker has a lot of faith and confidence in his work when a superfluous narration track is added, to plug those terrifying noiseless gaps. Whatever happened to poignant, suspenseful, sure-footed, gripping, emotionally-arresting dramas that take you on a nervy, wild ride to a thoroughly gratifying climax? A truly great director from Kurosowa to, well, Scorcese-(circa 1979) would have plotted the rise and fall of a maniacal protagonist along deeper and more affecting lines even at the risk boring its audience for one minute.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

DCEdmondsNov 13, 2014

"The Wolf of Wall Street" 10 Scale Rating: 6.5 (Decent) ...

The Good: DiCaprio was absolutely amazing and deserving of his Oscar nomination. Jonah Hill has really come a long way as an actor and was great as well. The cast all around"The Wolf of Wall Street" 10 Scale Rating: 6.5 (Decent) ...

The Good: DiCaprio was absolutely amazing and deserving of his Oscar nomination. Jonah Hill has really come a long way as an actor and was great as well. The cast all around deserved accolades. The story itself was interesting and Scorsese grabs your interest five minutes in.

The Bad: It is way too long and contains way too much filler. The film is about excess and I get that, but there were far too many scenes depicting it. It felt like of the three hours the movie takes to complete, two of them were lengthy sex, alcohol and drugs binges. That fact severely limited how good the film could be.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

NickTheCritickNov 4, 2021

This biopic movie is better than "The Aviator" i think, but again there is something that didn't convince me that much. The editing is great, acting too but this movie feels kind of ordinary. It straightly goes from point A to point Z throughThis biopic movie is better than "The Aviator" i think, but again there is something that didn't convince me that much. The editing is great, acting too but this movie feels kind of ordinary. It straightly goes from point A to point Z through some funny moments but it's not a movie that will stay with you for a long time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

BHBarryJan 7, 2014

“The Wolf of Wall Street” was directed by Martin Scorcese and stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Jonah Hill in the true story of Jordan Belfort, the self-made millionaire who operated a stock brokerage telemarketing operation that ultimately led to“The Wolf of Wall Street” was directed by Martin Scorcese and stars Leonardo DiCaprio and Jonah Hill in the true story of Jordan Belfort, the self-made millionaire who operated a stock brokerage telemarketing operation that ultimately led to his ruin and the ruin of his company and his duped investors. I’m no fan of Mr. DiCaprio who, no matter what adult role he plays, always reminds me of a little boy wearing his father’s felt hat. However, in this film, Mr. DiCaprio overcomes my previewing prejudices and is quite believable in his role as Mr. Belfort but, unfortunately, that’s where the kudos end. The film is 3 hours long but seems more like 6. Thelma Schoonmaker is being touted by the producers for “Best Film Editing” but her work product, at least to this viewer, is virtually unnoticed. The film is filled with gratuitous sex scenes that are more crude than craft and actually get in the way of the story and plot. Orgies may have their place in depicting a scene in a Roman harem but they simply detract from the film and like most of the unneeded scenes, add to the uncomfortable length of the picture. I give the film a 5 and recommend that, if you do go to see it, bring lunch and/or dinner, although the raunchy and tasteless scenes will probably destroy any appetite you might otherwise have had.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

5

khoinJan 2, 2014

This might be the weakest movie Martin Scorsese has ever done. I'm a huge Marty fan. I've literally seen everything the guy has done. This movie just missed the mark in so many areas. I couldn't engage with any of the characters. I had noThis might be the weakest movie Martin Scorsese has ever done. I'm a huge Marty fan. I've literally seen everything the guy has done. This movie just missed the mark in so many areas. I couldn't engage with any of the characters. I had no idea what motivated these characters other than money. It couldn't have been that simple. Damn!… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

The Wolf of Wall Street

User Reviews