Read User Reviews and Submit your own for The Twilight Saga: Eclipse

5

royalguy07Jun 26, 2023

Mostly staying in line, a lot of backstory and set up and very minimal forward plot movement.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Sosmooth1982Jan 13, 2023

A little better of a movie from the last one. Bella is still being pursued and now they have her scent and she has to make some tough decisions. There is at least some action in this one, instead of just their boring love story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TAPRDec 20, 2022

Assistir esse no cinema confirmou o que eu pensava: todo mundo acha ruim, mas é bom exatamente por isso. Só não supera Crepúsculo em memes e falas cafonas. A sequencia da Barraca na Tempestade de Neve é a melhor coisa desse filme pra rir.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

alexandreaNov 29, 2021

How can this be considered the best by the critics? It´s easily the second worst, it loses all the charm th first two had.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

larissa26Apr 9, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Great movie! It is filled with tension and has a looot of Bella and Edward kissing scenes, finally! The scenes in the meadow are so pretty! The only thing that ruins it for me is Bella and Jacob kissing... ew.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

motionpaintingsNov 20, 2020

Well, what can I say. perfect teen pop schmaltzy film. if you don't expect anything you won't be disappointed either.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

bfoore90Jul 12, 2020

An improvement over the second one but not by much. The direction, acting and setting is solid but the problem with these movies is pretty much the screenplay. The main symphosis states, "she is forced to choose between her love for EdwardAn improvement over the second one but not by much. The direction, acting and setting is solid but the problem with these movies is pretty much the screenplay. The main symphosis states, "she is forced to choose between her love for Edward and her friendship with Jacob — knowing that her decision has the potential to ignite the ageless struggle between vampire and werewolf. With her graduation quickly approaching, Bella is confronted with the most important decision of her life" but it's not really presented as much of a struggle. Theres maybe a couple lines, a couple scenes where Jacob seems credible but it's not enough to where you actually think she's going to choose Jacob over Edward. Not a bad film, but had the screenplay and writing had taken advantage of missed opportunities it could have been better… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

FilipeNetoMar 25, 2020

Darker, with more action, it keeps the level of the previous films, which is not a very good thing.

This film was based on a series of "best seller" books about the romance between a vampire and a young human. I never read the books (nor doDarker, with more action, it keeps the level of the previous films, which is not a very good thing.

This film was based on a series of "best seller" books about the romance between a vampire and a young human. I never read the books (nor do I intend to), but if Edward and Bella's love story was supposed to be epic, something didn't work. Despite this, this film was a box office champion, the teenagers consumed it well and the studio rubbed their hands in satisfaction, just as with the two previous films.

The plot boils down to this: again together, Edward and Bella look happy, but a succession of mysterious murders in neighboring Seattle indicates that Victoria, the couple's enemy, may be trying to raise an army of newly created vampires, which may endanger the entire Cullen clan and also Jacob's pack. On the other hand, the threat of the Volturi to interfere hangs over everyone and Bella doesn't seem to know how to deal with Jacob, in love with her, and whom she doesn't want to hurt.

Again we saw a change in the director's chair, with the arrival of David Slade. From a distance, we saw an improvement in direction with his arrival, showing the lack of capacity of its previous occupants. There is an improvement in the environment and in the story told, which becomes more profound and involving as the danger and the action become more and more present in the film. The fight scenes are very good, but very fast, which helped the film acquire a somewhat uneven pace, with fast scenes and much slower sequences. In addition, there are still serious problems inherited from previous films and which are closely linked to the way the actors behaved.

In fact, each film accentuates the feeling that Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson were gross casting errors and never adapted well to the characters and each other. There is almost no chemistry between them, despite an improvement in the dialogues and the story told. Their characters' romance no longer seems like a childish crush, as in the previous two films, but it is still a long way from looking as breathtaking as it was supposed to. With the exception of some very concrete scenes, there is no involvement or depth in the way both actors worked, and the romantic scenes seem like pauses in which we can disconnect a little from what we are seeing and, for example, go to the bathroom for a minute. . Taylor Lautner is good, but not as good as in the previous film, where he had more presence and showed more talent. Bryce Dallas Howard was a pretty good Victoria and a convincing villain. Billy Burke and Ashley Greene are very good and maintain the level they had so far.

Technically, the film maintains the good CGI, visible in the work of the wolves and in the extraordinarily choreographed action scenes. Howard Shore's soundtrack is very good, dark in the right measure and helped keep the soundtrack as one of the best strengths of the films in this tetralogy. Good scenarios, props, and very good large-scale images of cold and snowy landscapes complete the technical work.

This film is the darkest and most serious in tetralogy, but also the one that gives the audience the most action. We continue to face a dull story, but the introduction of these elements was welcome and helped the film to become more palatable and less boring.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

JPKDec 7, 2019

Better Than New Moon
New Moon was pretty bad so I had low expectations, But honestly, Eclipse is okay, Not perfect, But fine.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

TyranianApr 14, 2019

This film exudes stupidity at times and is probably a low point if that's possible.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

ErikTheCriticSep 29, 2018

Despite an improvement over the god-awful "New Moon", this third instalment is still filled with wooden acting, and a poor attempt at blending fantasy action and romance together.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LinttaFlamingoNov 18, 2016

While Eclipse is a HUGE improvement over the overly serious New Moon, with real action this time and a more relaxed tone and character development, it still has the same love triangle continuing and the usual protect Bella and kill the badWhile Eclipse is a HUGE improvement over the overly serious New Moon, with real action this time and a more relaxed tone and character development, it still has the same love triangle continuing and the usual protect Bella and kill the bad vampires stuff.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

ThreeboxIndoorsDec 23, 2016

Here we go again. Twilight: Eclipse is the unwanted sequel to the unwanted sequel to the not-so-well received Twilight, and it ends setting up another unwanted sequel. Once again, we have ourselves a poorly paced, poorly edited, poorly acted,Here we go again. Twilight: Eclipse is the unwanted sequel to the unwanted sequel to the not-so-well received Twilight, and it ends setting up another unwanted sequel. Once again, we have ourselves a poorly paced, poorly edited, poorly acted, poorly written and melodramatic movie with some of the most cringey dialogue i've heard in a film. Once again we have topless teenage boys roaming around, except this time, they're more abundant. We have a horribly filmed action scene in the third-act filled with incomprehensible shaky cam that irritated me to death. I am not looking forward to the next installment, and i'm going to give Twilight: Eclipse a 3/10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

MrMovieBuffOct 13, 2016

Once again, the "Twilight" franchise still proves to be as tedious, frustrating and flat-out even more boring than ever. "Eclipse" is probably the most unnecessary installment of the franchise, for the most part, it feels like padding andOnce again, the "Twilight" franchise still proves to be as tedious, frustrating and flat-out even more boring than ever. "Eclipse" is probably the most unnecessary installment of the franchise, for the most part, it feels like padding and filler until the next chapter comes along. So we sit through the things we expect.

To sum up the plot; Edward (Robert Pattinson) asks Bella (Kristen Stewart) for her hand in marriage, but Jacob (Taylor Lautner) is not happy because he's in love with Bella, too... not to mention that Bella does have some feelings for Jacob.

What I still don't understand is; why are both Edward and Jacob so fascinated by this woman? What is so amazing about Bella that they feel the need to go out their ways to try and impress her? She isn't exactly a world-changing woman... she is pale, devoid of interest and emotion... I sometimes wonder if it's because of Stewart's performance as the character, or if dullness is something that these two guys find intriguing about her. If that's the case, then they both have bad taste in women... then again, they're not great men either.

There really is no reason to get involved in this movie... the director, David Slade and screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg try to add more to make it more exciting, but instead it leaves us with the feeling of confusion and exhaustion. Just like the films before it, 'The Twilight Saga: Eclipse' contains a story that failed to make itself interesting, and instead tries too hard to add as much as possible.

The first two films were bad... I think you know how this one will go.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

JohnMasterLAug 7, 2015

Es superior en la mayoría de los aspectos que su antecesora, Eclipse es un capitulo "relleno" que no aporta ninguna novedad a la historia, la batalla final no es épica o increíble, pero es pasable... Un capitulo sin muchas sorpresas que llegaEs superior en la mayoría de los aspectos que su antecesora, Eclipse es un capitulo "relleno" que no aporta ninguna novedad a la historia, la batalla final no es épica o increíble, pero es pasable... Un capitulo sin muchas sorpresas que llega al punto de ser un poco aburrida y tediosa.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

JosephASowellJun 5, 2015

It is a huge improvement on this franchise. For one, it actually has a plot, and though its performances are still terrible, it offers a little bit more than the first two films

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

LoRevisorJan 8, 2015

Para minha alegria deixa lua nova no chinelo e passa crepúsculo por um ponto.Já que nesse temos ação e momentos mais legais mas mesmo assim não chega a ser um grande e excelente filme só razoável.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

diogomendesAug 1, 2014

While it could've been far worse than what the audience was expecting, "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse" is still a failure in cinematic terms and only devoted fanboys/fangirls will find satisfaction.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

chwJul 20, 2014

I actually enjoyed this. It wasn't fabulous, but it wasn't so much as the other Twilight movies. It didn't have any ridiculous lines that were ridiculously acted like in the others.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

OfficialMar 8, 2014

Just because of a slight improvement, the "Twilight" series won't win over much more fans. Once again, we have a bland script and terrible acting.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

nickrovertOct 24, 2013

'The Twilight Saga: Eclipse' basically consists of some people laying in a tent and communicating through poor acting and a lackluster screenplay that they are cold and at the climax a big tree falls. That's all that happens. Nonetheless, its'The Twilight Saga: Eclipse' basically consists of some people laying in a tent and communicating through poor acting and a lackluster screenplay that they are cold and at the climax a big tree falls. That's all that happens. Nonetheless, its better than its predecessor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DibbHansenJul 18, 2013

An interesting and beautifully filmed third installment of the Twilight saga, which is not as bad as everyone says it is. It is entertaining, some dull acting (Pattinson especially), but the visuals are great and the battle at the end isAn interesting and beautifully filmed third installment of the Twilight saga, which is not as bad as everyone says it is. It is entertaining, some dull acting (Pattinson especially), but the visuals are great and the battle at the end is very entertaining. I enjoyed this movie and have enjoyed how the story is unfolding on the big screen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BrunoADJun 16, 2013

Eclipse is better than its predecessors and does not disappoint in almost anything.

Eclipse is no longer stopped to Twilight and New Moon the movie starts with a suspenseful thriller and leaves this to the end, the effects and actionEclipse is better than its predecessors and does not disappoint in almost anything.

Eclipse is no longer stopped to Twilight and New Moon the movie starts with a suspenseful thriller and leaves this to the end, the effects and action scenes have improved over the cast remains boring and poorly acted as always, the soundtrack is good with nice touches for good scenes, the film manages to change a little insight minnha Twilight, but only slightly.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

WiesyApr 5, 2013

This movie is the best of the saga, there is action in it and now the actors say something when there is happenings nothing. Thae actors can be better and the story is better then the outer twilight movies.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

worleyjamersDec 8, 2012

Almost everything about this film was a major improvement upon the first two installments, but I had a real hard time getting into this one; I found it to be slow, uneventful, and surprisingly boring.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

jordiNov 24, 2012

Una auténtica historia de amor, un buen triángulo amoroso, momentos únicos como cuando Bella necesita calor humano. Personajes bien construídos. Sabemos más de algunos de los Cullen. Impresionante el cuerpoUna auténtica historia de amor, un buen triángulo amoroso, momentos únicos como cuando Bella necesita calor humano. Personajes bien construídos. Sabemos más de algunos de los Cullen. Impresionante el cuerpo de Taylor Lautner. No se le puede pedir más: o sí, que llegue ya la boda!!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

YoursTrulyNov 21, 2012

Suffers from the noticeably lazy writing and insufferable, repetitive dialog that comes with movies about fanatic teen pop culture trends. So, basically the same type of sh*t you could expect from the Twilight series. But the characterSuffers from the noticeably lazy writing and insufferable, repetitive dialog that comes with movies about fanatic teen pop culture trends. So, basically the same type of sh*t you could expect from the Twilight series. But the character development is a little stronger, it's shot competently, and it's got some action, emotion and anticipation. An enjoyable flick...but nothing to remember.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

cameronmorewoodNov 12, 2012

This new dose of vampire mush for puss:es is the worst load yet. It offers no payoff at the end, and not even any highlights throughout its duration. The plot literally flatlines after the first frame.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

imthenoobNov 8, 2012

I am not a Twilight fan boy, I have never read the books nor watched the movies until the part 1 of the fourth book came out. That being said, I didn't mind this movie. Only bad thing about the acting was that Lautner sucked, Did not care forI am not a Twilight fan boy, I have never read the books nor watched the movies until the part 1 of the fourth book came out. That being said, I didn't mind this movie. Only bad thing about the acting was that Lautner sucked, Did not care for him at all. I like how they explained more of the characters' history as well. Also, I find this movie as well as the book a rather pointless journey. It would have been easier to kill off Victoria in the first book, deal with Bella's decision between Edward and Jacob in the second, then get married in the third. It just seemed like such a pointless journey especially when we all know how it's gonna play out (even if this wasn't based on a book series, It was rather predictable on who she was gonna choose in the end). Again, it was not that bad. A little predictable but I didn't mind it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

jetpackulleySep 8, 2012

It's very unusual that the thrid ones be the better. The Twilight Saga: Eclipse is even way better than New Moon and Twilight, more involving and much entertaining and fun to see. The action sequences were finally real and watchable and itIt's very unusual that the thrid ones be the better. The Twilight Saga: Eclipse is even way better than New Moon and Twilight, more involving and much entertaining and fun to see. The action sequences were finally real and watchable and it doesn't focus so much on the love thing, just that it gives action a little more flow and topic. I definetly liked this one and if Breaking Dawn (prts. 1 and 2) are like this, the series, I guarantee, will start to grow.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

dev92Aug 24, 2012

Despite the fact that I despise these films, I thought that Eclipse was fairly viewable. There was more action which was desperately needed in the previous film whilst the storyline was half decent. It still seems to lack imagination in termsDespite the fact that I despise these films, I thought that Eclipse was fairly viewable. There was more action which was desperately needed in the previous film whilst the storyline was half decent. It still seems to lack imagination in terms of direction and also is acted fairly poorly. It is almost like the production company has decided that they barely need to try considering the fact that they are almost guaranteed the money. I can't blame them if I am honest.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

vini1904Aug 16, 2012

With a faster pace than the first two, this film is breathtaking, the story is more interesting and can keep us watching for longer than the second, an improvement.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Jeramyd69Jun 24, 2012

Bella, just get a life or end it. We are all just done. Kind of visually stunning film. That's pretty much I and everyone else can say...

Also Bella, it wouldn't hurt to surprise us all with a different facial expression...maybe?

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

aaronpaul121May 24, 2012

No improvements from the last movie. The plot is still weird and ridiculous. Taylor Lautner is still acting funny rather than dramatic. It still has scenes that doesn't have depth. It still lacks excitement. And it is still a book series thatNo improvements from the last movie. The plot is still weird and ridiculous. Taylor Lautner is still acting funny rather than dramatic. It still has scenes that doesn't have depth. It still lacks excitement. And it is still a book series that wasn't meant to be a movie.....… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MegWhiteleyMar 2, 2012

Uff, finally, this third part of the twilight saga is better than the other two, the situation is incredible, and the fight with the neo vampires is sorpresive, an incredible film.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

PahnJan 22, 2012

Woof! This movie is so bad, so poorly written, directed, and acted, that it's actually....good? No, never. It's horrible. This whole universe of lore is so ludicrous it borders on blasphemy. Vampires sparkle & they can reproduce thruWoof! This movie is so bad, so poorly written, directed, and acted, that it's actually....good? No, never. It's horrible. This whole universe of lore is so ludicrous it borders on blasphemy. Vampires sparkle & they can reproduce thru intercourse? Werewolves imprint on their soulmate? And at the center of this world is a mysteriously special "woe is me" dullard female who takes 3 movies to choose between the jock werewolf and the sparkly emo vampire.

I give it a 2 for comedic value.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Potter17Dec 28, 2011

Certainly, "Eclipse" is a major improvement when it comes about action and romance, but Slade's direction is too apathetic to make this film a thrilling one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

heyitsmegrif4Dec 17, 2011

With still the incredibly weak performances, and still unintentionally funny moments( basically most of the film) make this the worst written yet, but boy is it entertaining. I give this film a 38% of a good movie.

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

6

grandpajoe6191Dec 10, 2011

Although Bella's still the ignorant **** and the triangular romance is baffling as the HP one, "Eclipse" is possibly the best Twilight movie so far. Using REAL action, an understandable story, and an slighter increase in character developmentAlthough Bella's still the ignorant **** and the triangular romance is baffling as the HP one, "Eclipse" is possibly the best Twilight movie so far. Using REAL action, an understandable story, and an slighter increase in character development the movie finally develops into something more of a mindless romance blockbuster, the appropriate title this **** up saga so craved for. Overall, with bitten lips, I'll recommend it.… Expand

19 of 20 users found this helpful191

All this user's reviews

8

LeewayNov 27, 2011

"This latest installment of the twilight franchise is darker and deeper, the love center continues again."
Synopsis: This time an army of vampires (lead by newborn Riley and controlled by red-hair Victoria) threatens the small town of Forks,"This latest installment of the twilight franchise is darker and deeper, the love center continues again."
Synopsis: This time an army of vampires (lead by newborn Riley and controlled by red-hair Victoria) threatens the small town of Forks, the Cullens, the Blacks and probably even Charlie especially in the concerns of Bella Swan. Bella Swan is in near of graduation, with that in mind she needs to make the choice of becoming cold. Jacob is suffering from an obvious affection which Worried Bella tries to mend but doesn't want to go to deep with him (in details too about the near future). Edward is just being Edward, a maniac that is overly cautious about everything and a strong protector/love interest of Bella.
Bella knows that her timing is short and with the newborns, it isn't helping her choose. Quietly, the movie introduces us to the characters and their backgrounds. The first story to tell is of the Quileute tribe, this storytelling takes place in which Bella is invited to a gathering and the story is about how the cold-ones got into the La Push Reserve. The story doesn't feature intense violence and mayhem but there are a few body counts and blood. The Second is of Rosalie and the Third is of Jasper, the violence is mostly of noises and sounds. These Stories add depth to the character and the movie as well, we get to slip into the skins of our beloved characters (the werewolves and their duties/position).
Jacob shares more emotion this time, he's pretty desperate and Edward tries to convince Bella to understand/not to choose to become one of him. "You're so stubborn," he says to Bella.
Victoria is played by Bryce Dallas Howard, Bryce was originally supposed to be cast as Victoria but she had other plans so the role came onto powerful Rachelle Lefevre. Rachelle Lefevre is absolutely stunning, she did such a good job in New Moon that I thought no other person can play her role. However, Rachelle gets replaced by Bryce Dallas Howard in Eclipse and I hated Bryce ever since but you know who can blame her. In Eclipse, (to my surprise) Bryce did an amazing job even though she didn't look to good with the fake wig and her clothes didn't look vicious enough she did play Victoria the best way possible (her performance was pretty good).
Eclipse has enough potential to stand on its own merits, the humor is well placed and the action is exhilarating. David Slade did an awesome job commanding this heavy load of a franchise. Melissa Rosenberg is improving with the dialogue (Particularly the tent scene. "I am hotter than you," Jacob tease.), it isn't her fault that Bella is such a wuss about her decisions but hey I'm not a girl so how would I know.
It's action-packed and ready to be watched, finally a movie for guys.
Breaking Dawn is in another Year, hopefully it will have some sort of action.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Khunter4382Nov 21, 2011

Now here is an interesting and exciting Twilight film! The franchise jumped leaps and bounds with this film! It has a nice chunk of character development, a looming sense of impending doom, and awesome action sequences. This film feels moreNow here is an interesting and exciting Twilight film! The franchise jumped leaps and bounds with this film! It has a nice chunk of character development, a looming sense of impending doom, and awesome action sequences. This film feels more "real" and the audience begins to see the truth behind its characters. Lautner's performance here is really bad however, and the Dallas Howard replacement for Victoria was a mistake.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

portia_lautnerNov 11, 2011

So much action!!!! I love action movies and if you have read my reviews on the other two Twilight movies you will see how I bring up how there is not enough action. This one did not have alot alot of action but it had alot of action comparedSo much action!!!! I love action movies and if you have read my reviews on the other two Twilight movies you will see how I bring up how there is not enough action. This one did not have alot alot of action but it had alot of action compared to the other two films! The script was not slow at all! It kept you in the movie...it kept you engaged! The actors were fabulouse! Just awesome or great. They were so good I can not explain how good they were! My favorite scene in the movie was the scene after the tent scene. The scene where Bella asks Jacob to kiss her! Well I hope that you enjoyed reading this reveiw!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

abductionOct 1, 2011

One of the best Twilight movies so far. You have to go see it. Espesially if you are a werewolf fan and I am. I can not wait untill Breking Dawn comes out. Please please please do not judje the twilight saga movies by there actors andOne of the best Twilight movies so far. You have to go see it. Espesially if you are a werewolf fan and I am. I can not wait untill Breking Dawn comes out. Please please please do not judje the twilight saga movies by there actors and actresses or any of that. Give it a chance.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

julian_zizzleSep 22, 2011

I think this movie was good. I watched all three movies of this saga in three days and loved the story overall. But before that i have never read any Twilight books. This movie is not totally filled with action, nor total romance. But theI think this movie was good. I watched all three movies of this saga in three days and loved the story overall. But before that i have never read any Twilight books. This movie is not totally filled with action, nor total romance. But the existing action and fight scenes were well played and looked good to me. Characters were nice and talented. These movies were good enough to pull me into this story. But don't expect me to say something like these were the best movies i have ever saw.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

EclectomaniacSep 10, 2011

The best of the three released movies. Even so, it still manages to be pretty bad. With terrible acting, and knowing that Kristen Stewart can do so much better (as evidenced in "The Runaways"), if you're not already a "Twihard," then don't bother.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

MaxxSwan13Aug 29, 2011

It sucks. I hate it. Anyways, me and my friend made a bet. We are going to see Breaking Dawn Part 1 and see how fast it takes me to puke. Who ever loses has to buy the winner a burger from a restaurant. WISH ME LUCK!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

HasrionaJul 20, 2011

How many more Twilight films must they make before they finally realize that they are creating an abomination of a franchise? Although Eclipse is better than its two predecessors, which is hardly saying anything, it continues its dull andHow many more Twilight films must they make before they finally realize that they are creating an abomination of a franchise? Although Eclipse is better than its two predecessors, which is hardly saying anything, it continues its dull and lifeless story with very poor acting, dull imagery and a totally boring characters. Three films, three flops. This is getting ridiculous.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

joeboggsJun 25, 2011

I thought this was very good. Interesting story, fine acting and cinematography. I think it was a vast improvement on the second movie in the series. I look forward to seeing the next part.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

work75Jun 25, 2011

A different take on tired vampire stories. I do not know what people thought was bad about the acting. They all did their jobs exactly as they are described in the book.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

new2011Jun 25, 2011

I enjoyed it. Some people take everything so seriously. Its really not bad at all but people seem to have a vendetta against it which is strange to me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

buddy15Jun 25, 2011

A very good interpretation of the book. If you dont like the book dont go to see the movie. Simple as that. Why people have to make such a song and dance about it I dont know.

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

1

PopCulturistJun 10, 2011

One of the most boring movies I've ever seen... one of the worst actresses I've ever seen seriously the girl really needs some acting classes. They sell the Lautner boy like a piece of meat is always half naked =___=. Pattinson acting isOne of the most boring movies I've ever seen... one of the worst actresses I've ever seen seriously the girl really needs some acting classes. They sell the Lautner boy like a piece of meat is always half naked =___=. Pattinson acting is about 30/100. The "great final fight" is lame, MORE THAN LAME, for me this movie sucks. The only point I'm giving is for the character of "Alice" wich I found interesting.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

TransforminatorMay 19, 2011

The Twilight Saga Eclipse is the best movie of Twilight series there is action,there is suspense and some Horror scenes.people dont like this because this movie is from twilight saga series,but i think this is great!

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

BenjaminFrazierMar 14, 2011

This movie was bad. This was the first twilight movie I saw. A lot of wooden, sometimes hammy, acting, dumb love scenes, terrible script, average special effects, and a bad story with bad characters. I do not recommend that you see this movie.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

2

MrReviewerMar 10, 2011

More generic sparkly vampire nonsense that doesn't deserve your attention. Despite being a flavour of the month thing, where vampires are periodically "cool" again for a month or two, this movie caters for screaming fangirls and nothing else,More generic sparkly vampire nonsense that doesn't deserve your attention. Despite being a flavour of the month thing, where vampires are periodically "cool" again for a month or two, this movie caters for screaming fangirls and nothing else, please avoid if you are over the age of 13… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

gm101Feb 8, 2011

While the other two Twilight movies were bad, this one sets a new low by having the least interesting plot, meaning it was so bad, I would've given this movie a -5 if metacritic let us do it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

TopvideoJan 14, 2011

I thought it was great. the actors really made me feel like they meant it, and it sorta makes your head feel abit tipsy when you try to get back to reality.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

JonnyFendiJan 11, 2011

Thiz movie is phenomenal. A lot of movie-critics pout and sneer at thiz romantic flick. But on thiz review, I want to stay neutral and trying to be objective. If you want to be fair, whoever The Director or The Casts, will be getting a hardThiz movie is phenomenal. A lot of movie-critics pout and sneer at thiz romantic flick. But on thiz review, I want to stay neutral and trying to be objective. If you want to be fair, whoever The Director or The Casts, will be getting a hard time to fill viewer great expectation since everyone pays full attention on thiz franchise. The original content wrote by a woman novelist, Stephenie Meyer. Twilight Saga schedules for quadrilogy. I think thiz third constellation is better than the second one, NEW MOON (2009). But the first one TWILIGHT (2008) is still the best bcoz its mysterious atmosphere and great introduction by former Director, Catherine Hardwicke. Thiz time, The Director is David Slade (30 DAYS OF NIGHT (2007)). Thiz sequel has good paces on story-telling. Although some people said the sequences was a little bit slow and boring. But I think if you want to get some precise romantic scenes, thiz is the only way to do it. Slade successfully captures the emotions for some moments with his Close-up cinematography. If we look at the main Casts, Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson) and Isabella Swan (Kristen Stewart) do not show much improvement than before. The better performance belongs to Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner) with his deep gaze. The surprising best performance comes from the supporting Cast, Dakota Fanning as Jane, one of the Volturi members. With her accent tone and body language, Fanning made an incredible vampire aura. The blood-thirsty Jasper character (Jackson Rathbone) annoyed me a little bit. His character evolved too much. In two earlier prequels he is almost invisible, but on thiz third one, he has changed dramatically to become vampire warrior. I observe, Thiz is an odd movie, where girls love it, boys hate it. I hope they did not come to the theater just to see some good-looking faces (I am saying thiz, it is not bcoz I am a Twilighater). In the other hand, if you look inside, no matter how corny the movie is, it will be still a story to tell (I am saying thiz, it is not bcoz my close-one is Twilighter). The formula is repeated very well, Shirtless Werewolf plus Very-cool Vampire plus Girl who cannot even make up her mind, equal to Movie that totally twilight us.

Visit My Blog on JONNY'S MOVEE : http://jonnyfendi.blogspot.com… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Libra85Jan 1, 2011

It's hard to review this movie without mentioning the other two. But I will start by saying this movie is an improvement over the last. And on par with the first. The vampire clan are a really cool set of characters that have some depth. TheIt's hard to review this movie without mentioning the other two. But I will start by saying this movie is an improvement over the last. And on par with the first. The vampire clan are a really cool set of characters that have some depth. The shapeshifters really need to find a shirt. But they aren't terrible. This movie boast some very impressive fight scenes and Alice and Victoria, this time played by Bryce Dallas Howard, look really hot. There're are a few conversations in the movie that made me laugh too. So why the 4, Bella. The whole crappy story is about the most boring and uninteresting charactor in the movie. Why should I or anyone care about who she ends up with? And everything that she said and did was just annoying. This movie is a teenage girls fantasy and I guess that's who I have to be to enjoy it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

DarkCriticDec 30, 2010

I didn't like this movie,AT ALL!!! I don't why people think that this sparkling turd of the movie is so bad that I DON"T KNOW,IT'S JUST ANOTHER STUPID TWILIGHT WITH SPARKLING OF DUMBNESS!!! I don't know why people and some stupid criticsI didn't like this movie,AT ALL!!! I don't why people think that this sparkling turd of the movie is so bad that I DON"T KNOW,IT'S JUST ANOTHER STUPID TWILIGHT WITH SPARKLING OF DUMBNESS!!! I don't know why people and some stupid critics believe that this movie is really awesome,because it's not. It's like you're going to see a movie that you think this movie is going to be amazing,but I guess that this wants to see it because the viewers and the moviegoers thinks that we are all IDIOTS for watching this this THIS Sparking Vampire! But this third one could be the least bad,it only works. Much like the two Twilight movies are bad as ever and I guess that they least embearble to the series. The scenes are too corny,the action is few of them and they actually rip-off the "30 Days of Night" because the director did this movie into fighting scene like that,wouldn't be explain about the fighting in the movie or in the book,those three annoying morons are still annoying and I can't stand listening with those bad vampire tones all the time,I mean please I wouldn't pay attention to Edward Cullen about his lovey dovey crap of all time,and the scenes are much standard that it's not quite interesting. So that's all I have to say and for the record I should think that this movie will be exactly a "JUMPING INTO SHARK"!!! Thank you,if you feel so hating that third movie into sparking crap,please avoided! If any tween girls feel drunk and crack the whole time spinning their head,feel enjoying this movie. This is the movie that the people will watch to whole time,and us PLEASE!!! (Note: I just wanted thank Owen Gilberman from Entertainment Weekly for liking this movie and I have no point that this movie could be more interesting and for idiot critic like that,I wouldn't been trusted anybody who likes this movie and for shaming liking all the time,that's too harsh to everybody else and make us bad reviewing lack of opinions that it's just not the same,screw you and Twilight,LEAVE ME ALONE!!!)… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

0

roddersj04Dec 29, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Okay, seriously? This is what some people consider to be a good film? This is what people were up at midnight to see? You gotta pray for humanity, even if you don't believe in God. Okay, opening rant aside, lets move onto the actual film review. This films plot is less stupid than New Moon. Here, it's basically Newborn Vampires VS The Cullens and Jacobs Pack. The problem with that is that the Newborns are hugely anticipated and so built up, but, the fight lasts barely a minute, and they don't even do damage against the good guys. Bella's a **** There she is stringing Jacob along, when we all know she'll choose Edward over him. Heck, they're discussing him turning her at the beginning of the film. Poor Jacob, his heart being played like some toy. The dialogue was crap. This is an actual piece of dialogue. Charlie Swan: What's going on? Jacob Black: [pause] I kissed Bella. [pause] Jacob Black: And she broke her hand. [pause] Jacob Black: Punching my face. [pause] Jacob Black: It was a complete misunderstanding. Whoever wrote dialogue like that probably wrote for Andromeda. The troubling thing is that in the theater I was in, people actually laughed at that dialogue. They'd probably have laughed if someone just got up their and jingled a bunch of keys. And we're supposed to believe that Bella and Edward are in love? They have as much chemistry as a rapist and his victim. And Edward still looks like a **** with his pale ass face, his disco ball impressions in the sunlight and hair being 95% gel I will add one positive thing: Bryce Dallas Howard and Ashley Greene are beautiful! Thats the only good thing I can say about this piece of crapola. To close this review, If you see a twilight fan who calls this the best film of the year, do the right thing. Slap them over the head, give them a copy of Nosferatu, Dracula, Near Dark or 30 days of night and hope they get immerssed into a REAL vampire movie… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

TENCATIJADec 23, 2010

So to start off, I have never read the books and I completely hated the first movie but this movie was actually something that I liked. I feel like this movie broke away from the relationship between Edward and Bella(but it was stillSo to start off, I have never read the books and I completely hated the first movie but this movie was actually something that I liked. I feel like this movie broke away from the relationship between Edward and Bella(but it was still present), and it really took on a little bit of the horror genre (thanks to the director of 30 Days of Night). This movie starts to really show its dark side and we as the audience start to connect with some of the other characters and their lives as well as Bella and Edward's. I am not a romantic and love movie type of person but the action and the plot really moved me and kept me engaged and excited for the final two movies. I recommend this movie because it was so good, that after I watched the premiere, I had to watch it again 10 hours later.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

iamtrent424Dec 6, 2010

This movie has a nice story and more blood then the last two but could have been better. I been following twilight movies since part one came out and still none of the movies measure up to the first movie. I like this movie but i can't watchThis movie has a nice story and more blood then the last two but could have been better. I been following twilight movies since part one came out and still none of the movies measure up to the first movie. I like this movie but i can't watch it over and over again. This movie isn't the type of movie I could watch over again. I like twilight , but it could be better. This movie is a huge bounce back from new moon. Twilight new moon was a bad movie. I didn't like it at all. This movie is bouncing back to being a good movie. The director did a fine job with putting more blood and gore in this movie. This movie was good but still it could have been better… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SabrinnaDec 5, 2010

Brilliant opening scene that actually looks like a real vampire movie. This makes a nice change from the first two. But unfortunately our next scene is Edward, the 110 year/old Vampire asking Bella, a 17 yr/old girl to marry him. It's a tadBrilliant opening scene that actually looks like a real vampire movie. This makes a nice change from the first two. But unfortunately our next scene is Edward, the 110 year/old Vampire asking Bella, a 17 yr/old girl to marry him. It's a tad creepy. Th forest chase was excellent, great effects and the very thing vampire fans love. The love triangle is a bit pitiful and 'same old'. Let's hope that's the last we see of it and Jacob moves on to a far more interesting girl. Overall this is better than it's two predecessors.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

OscarPicks2010Nov 29, 2010

The Twilight series are just simply not worth ranting about over the net. Sure Taylor Lautner is attractive and sure there is chemistry between Stewart and Pattinson, but the franchise is crap and we all know it. Predictably when they made aThe Twilight series are just simply not worth ranting about over the net. Sure Taylor Lautner is attractive and sure there is chemistry between Stewart and Pattinson, but the franchise is crap and we all know it. Predictably when they made a successful novel, they will probably turn it into a movie, so there born the Twilight series. Written elegantly by Stephanie Meyers and ruined by Hollywood. Even though in this particular film I admired the CGI effects and the director, it still doesn't make up for the bumpy plot and high school acting. Especially Lautner, all he is good for is pleasing the audience (girls) with his abs and that is not acting (to say the least). Twilight Saga: Eclipse has its goods but there weren't enough to cover its faults.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

FitriAmirrolNov 19, 2010

Drop the act, people. Eclipse is utter modern vampire love fantasy. Every moment is padded with tacky lines and subpar acting, and had it not been for a couple of entertaining scenes in the last 30 minutes, the whole two hours wouldâ

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

KundKNov 16, 2010

Parts 2 and 3 of the saga would be terrible if they weren't hilarious in their awfulness. The novels are poorly written tripe, a cut below Barbara Cartland-style romances and that doesn't help things. The movie version accentuates the lack ofParts 2 and 3 of the saga would be terrible if they weren't hilarious in their awfulness. The novels are poorly written tripe, a cut below Barbara Cartland-style romances and that doesn't help things. The movie version accentuates the lack of structure, pacing, unity, rhyme and reason. There's also a pack of Mononoke-huge wolves so that's a plus. Also, no comedy in tha last three year made me laugh as much as Twilight trilogy and although it was unintentionally funny, I respect funny. So... go Bianca and Godfrey and Jimbo, whatever your names are!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AxlthehunterNov 5, 2010

As yet another Husband/Boyfriend/Fiance Watching this series without any other choice, I can say that if I were to choose to watch any of the series of my own accord for some reason, so far it would be this one. The story is admitedly good,As yet another Husband/Boyfriend/Fiance Watching this series without any other choice, I can say that if I were to choose to watch any of the series of my own accord for some reason, so far it would be this one. The story is admitedly good, while the overall themes presented by said story may be generic, it is a workable and enjoyable plot if you ask me. The effects, no one, not even the most extreme opponents of the Twilight Saga can deny are incredible stacked against any movie. Also this one just has more action so really, the truth is, more guys may be able to accept this one as a decent movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

PrincessT1991Nov 1, 2010

This movie was not perfect, or anywhere near perfect at that. But I did enjoy it. Isn't that what watching movies is about? Eclipse was 10 times better than Twilight and New Moon. Sometimes the movie got to confusing, but I did enjoy it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MovieLonely94Oct 31, 2010

this is so much better than the first two movies.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

honeymoonOct 27, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I saw it with my girlfriend and she's really into this stuff (vampires etc.). Maybe that's why I found this film a little bit frivolous. I don't mind if someone like it - it's his stuff. But please, I don't wanna hear about it all time. When will the new Twilight movie hit the cinemas? Really, I don't care… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

yo_miloOct 12, 2010

I went with my little sister and my girlfriend to see the movie... My Gf was falling asleep, impresive, since she is kind of a Twilight fan. My little sister, 15 YO, watched every minute of the film, and at the end she told me it sucked...I went with my little sister and my girlfriend to see the movie... My Gf was falling asleep, impresive, since she is kind of a Twilight fan. My little sister, 15 YO, watched every minute of the film, and at the end she told me it sucked... Well, we all three concluded the movie sucks, specially the plot, and more specifically *Spoooooooooooooooileeeeeer* the promiscuity of Bella Swam...

I only liked the first book, finished the second just to kill time, and did not bother with the third... But even if you like twilight like my sis or dislike as me, this movie plain sucks... Really… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AaronMOct 11, 2010

Whereas the first two movies were very slow, this one tries to balance action and character development, and for the most part does it well. (I admit I've only read the first book and watched the first two movies on DVD). Fans seem split intoWhereas the first two movies were very slow, this one tries to balance action and character development, and for the most part does it well. (I admit I've only read the first book and watched the first two movies on DVD). Fans seem split into Team Jacob and Team Edward camps, and each will have much to cheer for in this movie. I'd say give this movie a shot if interested.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

Forrestgump1Oct 9, 2010

"It was good not great , very optimistic , the ending felt rushed and unoriginal , the acting was for the most part ok , Eclipse surpasses New Moon , The action sequence at the end was pretty moderate to , all in all this movie is reasonably"It was good not great , very optimistic , the ending felt rushed and unoriginal , the acting was for the most part ok , Eclipse surpasses New Moon , The action sequence at the end was pretty moderate to , all in all this movie is reasonably enjoyable" .. B-… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

JustinSmithSep 26, 2010

"Is it better than New Moon?" After viewing The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, this was the first question asked by most people, and the answer is "Yes.", but that doesn't mean that Eclipse is good.
The third outing into Forks, Washington retreads"Is it better than New Moon?" After viewing The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, this was the first question asked by most people, and the answer is "Yes.", but that doesn't mean that Eclipse is good.
The third outing into Forks, Washington retreads much of the same ground as the first two films, Edward (Robert Pattinson) and Jacob (Taylor Lautner) are both still fighting for Bella's (Kristen Stewart) love, which leads to discussions like, "I want to be a vampire. But you shouldn't become a vampire. I want to have sex. We shouldn't have sex until we're married. I like the cold vampire and the warm wolf, why can't they just get along?" Of course we know there's also going to be a battle, either between vampires and wolves, vampires and vampires, or a mix of vampires, wolves, and more vampires. There's more shirtless abs too, Edward even asks Bella at one point, "Doesn't he own a shirt?"
If you can sit through all this, there is about 45 minutes of worthwhile footage, mostly consisting of Jasper Hale (Jackson Rathbone) or Charlie Swan (Billy Burke). Bella's loving father, Charlie, is his usual comic-relief self, and he maintains and like-able presence while remaining concerned for Bella's well-being. Every scene with Charlie is enjoyable. Jasper is a different animal altogether, as the most mysterious, and unpredictable, of the Cullen coven, Jasper finally comes out of his shell to show that, (surprise, surprise) Jackson Rathbone can act. Rathbone never comes across cheesy or lame, and he delivers his sub-par lines in such a way that we focus not on what he's saying, but how he says it.
Another bonus in this installment of The Twilight Saga, are the featured back-stories of select members of the Cullen coven. Up til now, Edward's the only one graced with a "How I became a teenage vampire" story, and it's not just the low temperature bloodsuckers who have a history lesson to share, we also learn a little history of the Quil wolf tribe.
The actors are slightly better this time around and deliver less cringe-worthy moments. The dialogue is still uninspired, but I can't blame the director, David Slade (check out his film Hard Candy (2005), to see what he's capable of when he has a good script and actors). In Eclipse, Dakota Fanning is still shaping up to become the next Meryl Streep, I hope to see more than a few stares and harsh words from her in the next two films. Ashley Greene, my other favorite actress in the film, who plays the future seeing vampire, Alice, isn't in many scenes, but she's great, as always, in her few moments on-screen. Although I wasn't thrilled with Rachelle Lefevre in the first two films as Victoria, the red-head vamp who's set on ridding the Earth of Bella, she was a better fit than Bryce Dallas Howard, who, although a good actress, doesn't have the qualities needed to pull off the heartless soulless creature bent on destruction and revenge.
David Slade uses more static and wide shots, giving the viewer more to chew on and allowing them to take in the scene as well as the moment. On the down side several hand-held scenes were too shaky, not The Blair Witch Project (1999) or Cloverfield (2008) shaky, but it gets annoying. The CGI wolves had been vastly improved, yet still possessed an air of cartoonish quality, making them less believable in some scene.
There will never be a better score for any Twilight film than that of Carter Burwell, the masterful composer behind the score of the first film (you may recognize his talent from the Coen Brothers films, Fargo (1996), No Country For Old Men (2007), and Burn After Reading (2008)). Despite this, Howard Shore brings the score back from the depths it sank to in New Moon to a more acceptable level in Eclipse. Even the songs this time around work better in their scenes.
Eclipse isn't the Twilight film I'd hoped for, but the moments that weren't filled with Bella, Edward, and Jacob drama were decent. Plus, I now have a new actor to keep an eye on.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JemsSep 13, 2010

There isn't much blood sucking vampires in this film and half of the vampires only drink blood from animals. I have to admit I did enjoy the story and the setting which was beautiful and worked well. However I can't say much for 'KristenThere isn't much blood sucking vampires in this film and half of the vampires only drink blood from animals. I have to admit I did enjoy the story and the setting which was beautiful and worked well. However I can't say much for 'Kristen Stewart's' acting as she acts like she's stoned all the way through the movie. 'Robert Pattinson' really does his character justice and it's fair to say he has certainly made a lot of female fans. 'Taylor Lautner' has turned a few heads too and he will be appearing in the new thriller 'Abduction.' I'm also loving 'Rachelle Lefevre's' acting who portrays the character Victoria really well. All in all I'm going to rate this an eight due to most of the actor's performance's. However I have to take a point off due to it's shaky, weak start and 'Kristen Stewart's' acting which is embarrassing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

tghm1801Sep 6, 2010

Easily the best movie of the series so far, and I feel it was a mostly faithful tribute to one of my favourite books.
Eclipse was highly enjoyable and not to be missed, and I wait eagerly for the DVD.
It also happens to be one of my favouriteEasily the best movie of the series so far, and I feel it was a mostly faithful tribute to one of my favourite books.
Eclipse was highly enjoyable and not to be missed, and I wait eagerly for the DVD.
It also happens to be one of my favourite movies.
EVER.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

HOTBRUNETTE111Aug 30, 2010

I like the story and the locations where the film was shot but I think that they could have chosen better actors as Bella and Edward. There is no chemistry between them (who are supposed to be a couple) and the acting is bland and fake.I like the story and the locations where the film was shot but I think that they could have chosen better actors as Bella and Edward. There is no chemistry between them (who are supposed to be a couple) and the acting is bland and fake. everything about Kristen Steward irritates me. she cant act and surely there are better female actors who could have played bella and made it convincing that she has this big thing for edward an all the drama that she goes through.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

SonicphotoAug 29, 2010

While in general, I don't find that much excitement with this saga, this third installment is actually the best one so far. The whole drama with the romance remains here but it also puts in new villains and the return of Victoria as theirWhile in general, I don't find that much excitement with this saga, this third installment is actually the best one so far. The whole drama with the romance remains here but it also puts in new villains and the return of Victoria as their leader. The direction done with this third part is done much better and has a more interesting point of view in terms of script and overall story. Let's hope that fourth installment does the same or better.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

darkokidAug 23, 2010

i have to admit i haven't read the books, and i watched the movies just to know what's everyone so crazy about. but this movie was super-boring. it wasn't as horrible as new moon, but the acting almost made me cry with frustration. i mean,i have to admit i haven't read the books, and i watched the movies just to know what's everyone so crazy about. but this movie was super-boring. it wasn't as horrible as new moon, but the acting almost made me cry with frustration. i mean, they get paid soooo much money for this??? i just don't understand why the movies are such a big hit. it has nothing we haven't seen before!!! little advice, read anne rice, watch true blood, coz that's about real vampires. this is just a pile of crap. thank gods i'm not stupid enough to pay to see this garbage… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

markAug 22, 2010

I've just started to write a script which will make me millionaire. Here's the recipe; dig out a few Mills & Boon romantic trash novels (3 in all), re-write the romantic hero as a cutesy-wootsey werewolf, who upon the sight of a full moonI've just started to write a script which will make me millionaire. Here's the recipe; dig out a few Mills & Boon romantic trash novels (3 in all), re-write the romantic hero as a cutesy-wootsey werewolf, who upon the sight of a full moon enjoys to nothing more than to roll-over and have his belly tickled. Enter the romantic anti-hero who doesn't admire having his belly tickled so much, but rather prefers gnawing at a butcher's bone and terrifying stray kittens of an evening. Let one cute human, kitten-owning teen to be a the centre of a love triangle between said doe-eyed-beasties. Put together a cast of good-looking young people to populate the families, friends and townsfolk of this fictional village. Don't let any of the protagonists kiss until the very last 10 minutes of the final movie in order to maintain a high level of suspense among the female, pre-teen audience.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

xiuyiwangAug 20, 2010

Love all the parts in the film without Bella and Edward being lovey dovey. Jacob is better in the book. Argh. The scenes for the supporting characters are definitely interesting and the highlight of the film

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

MaxAug 20, 2010

There's something highly appealing to the Twilight saga, though I can't put my finger on it. The characters are wooden, the plot is laughable, and the direction is uninspired. Yet I found myself enjoying Eclipse much more than the first two,There's something highly appealing to the Twilight saga, though I can't put my finger on it. The characters are wooden, the plot is laughable, and the direction is uninspired. Yet I found myself enjoying Eclipse much more than the first two, but not for reasons the filmmakers would hope. It's a terrible film, but thoroughly enjoyable if you're in the right mood. Look for all of the intentional and unintentional double-entendres; their inclusion, no matter how immature they may be, are the most enjoyable thing about this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

rodericrinehartAug 14, 2010

It's teeny-bopper sheen, abs, and amateurish writing obscures what could have been a good movie. It's too bad the plot centers around a love triangle and romantic lines that would make George Lucas cringe.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

HarbingerAug 13, 2010

Eclipse is the best of the Twilight films so far, but the series still needs a lot of improvement-notably on the acting and dialogue. Anyways, it was mostly good. I enjoyed it. A 7.25/10.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

thelordoffilmAug 13, 2010

I have never been a fan of the Twilight Saga I find them boring and badly paced. However I must give credit to where credit is due and I honestly have to say I enjoyed this installment. What worries me the most is that David Slade wonâ

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

TheKennedyCurseAug 13, 2010

The majority of teenage girls and I, do not see eye-to-eye on entertainment. They enjoy things like One Tree Hill, pop music, and whatever is on MTV while they're sitting in-front of the television. Things that promote superficiality,The majority of teenage girls and I, do not see eye-to-eye on entertainment. They enjoy things like One Tree Hill, pop music, and whatever is on MTV while they're sitting in-front of the television. Things that promote superficiality, melodrama and self-absorption. Twilight is yet another of these things. It's badly written, terribly acted, superficial, and worst-of-all, boring as hell. I cannot say enough bad things about this, and the fact that this has become as popular a fad as it has, makes me want to die a slow agonizing death from cancer just to get my mind off of it. This isn't receiving a 0 because "I'm a guy and guys just hate Twilight because girls enjoy it". This is getting a 0 because it is truly earned, by a movie (and book) that have no thought put into beyond the characters appearances. There is nothing redeemable to list here.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

JularaAug 11, 2010

The film is utter nonsense, acting is horrible and the chemistry between Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner is horrible. I only tolerated this film because I like the books and that's not saying much

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ine(L)cortesJul 6, 2010

Eclipse is the greatest movie in the world. When I saw it for the first time I really wanted to watch it again and again. I went to the theare the first day it was played. At the time my friends and I got out the cinema we went and book Eclipse is the greatest movie in the world. When I saw it for the first time I really wanted to watch it again and again. I went to the theare the first day it was played. At the time my friends and I got out the cinema we went and book others tickets for us to watch it at the passing two days. I think the saga of twilight its really good and I wouldn't change anything of it.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful

6

ChadS.Jul 6, 2010

The third installment of the "Twilight" saga is another total eclipse of the genre, the horror genre, which is dominated by male narratives. "Eclipse" has a feminine one. At least the vampires and wolves and the Joan Jett impersonator The third installment of the "Twilight" saga is another total eclipse of the genre, the horror genre, which is dominated by male narratives. "Eclipse" has a feminine one. At least the vampires and wolves and the Joan Jett impersonator don't sing like the "monster" in Andrew Lloyd Webber's "Phantom of the Opera". At least "Twilight" isn't a musical...yet. So there's no need to bang on this franchise for not being Katherine Bigelow's "Near Dark", or Josh Whedon's "Buffy the Vampire Slayer", until, that is, Bella and Edward perform a love duet sometime in the future on a Broadway stage. After all, boys aren't the only one who need mythical heroes. If "Star Wars" was intended for girls, Darth Vader would have used "The Force" on Princess Leia, in a heartbeat, to lure her away from Luke Skywalker. Love would become as important as conquering the galaxy to the foes, who are, of course, both related to the only readily available female for pro-creation as a preventive measure against the sort of scene in "Eclipse" where the interspecies lovers polarize the sexes in a violet field with their languorous talk about themselves. If Leia wasn't his spawn, Vader would have definitely tried to f*** the princess, but he's locked into a male narrative which removes that possibility by default. While there's action in "Eclipse", it never gets in the way of the love that exists among this latter-day "Jules and Jim", who both pine for Catherine(played by Jeanne Morreau in the 1962 Francois Truffaut classic). Edward and Jacob, who both pine for Bella, are in perfect position to bridge the desires of the moviegoing sexes when this precarious trio are caught in a snowstorm, where the vampire, because he's a raspberry popsicle, employs the wolfboy to warm up his shivery girlfriend. If Jacob and Bella went all the way, it would, for all intents and purposes, precipitate a battle to the death, which is what the material cries out for. But the "Twilight" series is "Star Wars" for girls, and there are preventive measure in place to appease the core audience. So they cuddle. Edward can handle abs.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

2

SpencerW.Jul 6, 2010

The Twilight Saga previously consisted of 2 mediocre films.Well now it has a bad one too.My first concern with the movie is its budget.It seems that when the director was given the over 90 million budget his first tought was,ok we gotta have The Twilight Saga previously consisted of 2 mediocre films.Well now it has a bad one too.My first concern with the movie is its budget.It seems that when the director was given the over 90 million budget his first tought was,ok we gotta have an epic action.Well at the cost of some good action scenes the plot goes nowhere and the characters,especially Edward are as dimensional as a piece of paper and as intersting as a rock.This Vampire romance almost hits bottom.Do yourself a favor and don't watch it.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful

9

DaphneA.Jul 6, 2010

Great movie! Eclipse has all the intensity it promised. All of the actors/actresses are awesome and as always, I leave the theatre waiting for the rest of the story.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

FrancescaR.Jul 6, 2010

Best of all of the Twilight movies. I never got what all the rave was, now I do. Yes, its corny, its like the Clueless of Vampires but its amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

FabianK.Jul 6, 2010

The first one was mediocre, the second was bland, but Twilight franchise finally found its tone with Eclipse. Very good romance flick.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

MarkM.Jul 6, 2010

Bring a vuvuzela to a screening of this movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

NatalieS.Jul 5, 2010

I happen to like it. Isn't the point of watching most movies is to be in another place & to try experiencing something different? Alot of people don't have perfect lives, so to crash down on something that gives some hope is not I happen to like it. Isn't the point of watching most movies is to be in another place & to try experiencing something different? Alot of people don't have perfect lives, so to crash down on something that gives some hope is not very nice!!… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful

5

DeanneTJul 5, 2010

It was better than the first two, but as an overall movie, it was still horrible. Pattinson and Stewart got a little better at becoming their characters, but are still not the world's best.. They do not portray the characters very well.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BarbaraLJul 5, 2010

Good solid interpertation of the third book. Casting and characters are true to the spirit of the story, which may not be life changing but is a pleasant escape. Not sure why all the haters bothered to attend? It might be a niche, but Good solid interpertation of the third book. Casting and characters are true to the spirit of the story, which may not be life changing but is a pleasant escape. Not sure why all the haters bothered to attend? It might be a niche, but it's still entertainment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JenniferJul 5, 2010

Definitely my favourite of all of the 3. Thought it waws fanrtastic. Bryce made a great Victoria and I loved the back stories.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

TrirahayuJul 5, 2010

I appreciate all the works of the saga on screens so far, but, Twilight Saga should've been directed from earlier by the those 'cold hands' such as Peter Jackson, James Cameron or Spielberg,perhaps. I don't know if I appreciate all the works of the saga on screens so far, but, Twilight Saga should've been directed from earlier by the those 'cold hands' such as Peter Jackson, James Cameron or Spielberg,perhaps. I don't know if they've been read the books and get into them or not..but at least, we'all know how well-directed they are when combining the story(Lord of the Ring), the plot(Indiana Jones), the sci-fi(ET) or even the romance(Titanic and Avatar) into something not only worth-magic beyond the imaginations but they're all,yeah, worth seeing for the audiences (the fans and the outsiders), worth experiences for the casts, and off course definetely great-investments for all those in the principle managements.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful