The Twilight Saga: Eclipse
Summit Entertainment | Release Date: June 30, 2010
5.1
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 521 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
189
Mixed:
152
Negative:
180
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
6
grandpajoe6191Dec 10, 2011
Although Bella's still the ignorant **** and the triangular romance is baffling as the HP one, "Eclipse" is possibly the best Twilight movie so far. Using REAL action, an understandable story, and an slighter increase in character developmentAlthough Bella's still the ignorant **** and the triangular romance is baffling as the HP one, "Eclipse" is possibly the best Twilight movie so far. Using REAL action, an understandable story, and an slighter increase in character development the movie finally develops into something more of a mindless romance blockbuster, the appropriate title this **** up saga so craved for. Overall, with bitten lips, I'll recommend it.… Expand
19 of 20 users found this helpful191
All this user's reviews
4
rodericrinehartAug 14, 2010
It's teeny-bopper sheen, abs, and amateurish writing obscures what could have been a good movie. It's too bad the plot centers around a love triangle and romantic lines that would make George Lucas cringe.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
DarkCriticDec 30, 2010
I didn't like this movie,AT ALL!!! I don't why people think that this sparkling turd of the movie is so bad that I DON"T KNOW,IT'S JUST ANOTHER STUPID TWILIGHT WITH SPARKLING OF DUMBNESS!!! I don't know why people and some stupid criticsI didn't like this movie,AT ALL!!! I don't why people think that this sparkling turd of the movie is so bad that I DON"T KNOW,IT'S JUST ANOTHER STUPID TWILIGHT WITH SPARKLING OF DUMBNESS!!! I don't know why people and some stupid critics believe that this movie is really awesome,because it's not. It's like you're going to see a movie that you think this movie is going to be amazing,but I guess that this wants to see it because the viewers and the moviegoers thinks that we are all IDIOTS for watching this this THIS Sparking Vampire! But this third one could be the least bad,it only works. Much like the two Twilight movies are bad as ever and I guess that they least embearble to the series. The scenes are too corny,the action is few of them and they actually rip-off the "30 Days of Night" because the director did this movie into fighting scene like that,wouldn't be explain about the fighting in the movie or in the book,those three annoying morons are still annoying and I can't stand listening with those bad vampire tones all the time,I mean please I wouldn't pay attention to Edward Cullen about his lovey dovey crap of all time,and the scenes are much standard that it's not quite interesting. So that's all I have to say and for the record I should think that this movie will be exactly a "JUMPING INTO SHARK"!!! Thank you,if you feel so hating that third movie into sparking crap,please avoided! If any tween girls feel drunk and crack the whole time spinning their head,feel enjoying this movie. This is the movie that the people will watch to whole time,and us PLEASE!!! (Note: I just wanted thank Owen Gilberman from Entertainment Weekly for liking this movie and I have no point that this movie could be more interesting and for idiot critic like that,I wouldn't been trusted anybody who likes this movie and for shaming liking all the time,that's too harsh to everybody else and make us bad reviewing lack of opinions that it's just not the same,screw you and Twilight,LEAVE ME ALONE!!!)… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
5
HOTBRUNETTE111Aug 30, 2010
I like the story and the locations where the film was shot but I think that they could have chosen better actors as Bella and Edward. There is no chemistry between them (who are supposed to be a couple) and the acting is bland and fake.I like the story and the locations where the film was shot but I think that they could have chosen better actors as Bella and Edward. There is no chemistry between them (who are supposed to be a couple) and the acting is bland and fake. everything about Kristen Steward irritates me. she cant act and surely there are better female actors who could have played bella and made it convincing that she has this big thing for edward an all the drama that she goes through.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
heyitsmegrif4Dec 17, 2011
With still the incredibly weak performances, and still unintentionally funny moments( basically most of the film) make this the worst written yet, but boy is it entertaining. I give this film a 38% of a good movie.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
6
ChadS.Jul 6, 2010
The third installment of the "Twilight" saga is another total eclipse of the genre, the horror genre, which is dominated by male narratives. "Eclipse" has a feminine one. At least the vampires and wolves and the Joan Jett impersonator The third installment of the "Twilight" saga is another total eclipse of the genre, the horror genre, which is dominated by male narratives. "Eclipse" has a feminine one. At least the vampires and wolves and the Joan Jett impersonator don't sing like the "monster" in Andrew Lloyd Webber's "Phantom of the Opera". At least "Twilight" isn't a musical...yet. So there's no need to bang on this franchise for not being Katherine Bigelow's "Near Dark", or Josh Whedon's "Buffy the Vampire Slayer", until, that is, Bella and Edward perform a love duet sometime in the future on a Broadway stage. After all, boys aren't the only one who need mythical heroes. If "Star Wars" was intended for girls, Darth Vader would have used "The Force" on Princess Leia, in a heartbeat, to lure her away from Luke Skywalker. Love would become as important as conquering the galaxy to the foes, who are, of course, both related to the only readily available female for pro-creation as a preventive measure against the sort of scene in "Eclipse" where the interspecies lovers polarize the sexes in a violet field with their languorous talk about themselves. If Leia wasn't his spawn, Vader would have definitely tried to f*** the princess, but he's locked into a male narrative which removes that possibility by default. While there's action in "Eclipse", it never gets in the way of the love that exists among this latter-day "Jules and Jim", who both pine for Catherine(played by Jeanne Morreau in the 1962 Francois Truffaut classic). Edward and Jacob, who both pine for Bella, are in perfect position to bridge the desires of the moviegoing sexes when this precarious trio are caught in a snowstorm, where the vampire, because he's a raspberry popsicle, employs the wolfboy to warm up his shivery girlfriend. If Jacob and Bella went all the way, it would, for all intents and purposes, precipitate a battle to the death, which is what the material cries out for. But the "Twilight" series is "Star Wars" for girls, and there are preventive measure in place to appease the core audience. So they cuddle. Edward can handle abs.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
5
OscarPicks2010Nov 29, 2010
The Twilight series are just simply not worth ranting about over the net. Sure Taylor Lautner is attractive and sure there is chemistry between Stewart and Pattinson, but the franchise is crap and we all know it. Predictably when they made aThe Twilight series are just simply not worth ranting about over the net. Sure Taylor Lautner is attractive and sure there is chemistry between Stewart and Pattinson, but the franchise is crap and we all know it. Predictably when they made a successful novel, they will probably turn it into a movie, so there born the Twilight series. Written elegantly by Stephanie Meyers and ruined by Hollywood. Even though in this particular film I admired the CGI effects and the director, it still doesn't make up for the bumpy plot and high school acting. Especially Lautner, all he is good for is pleasing the audience (girls) with his abs and that is not acting (to say the least). Twilight Saga: Eclipse has its goods but there weren't enough to cover its faults.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
royalguy07Jun 26, 2023
Mostly staying in line, a lot of backstory and set up and very minimal forward plot movement.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
TrirahayuJul 5, 2010
I appreciate all the works of the saga on screens so far, but, Twilight Saga should've been directed from earlier by the those 'cold hands' such as Peter Jackson, James Cameron or Spielberg,perhaps. I don't know if I appreciate all the works of the saga on screens so far, but, Twilight Saga should've been directed from earlier by the those 'cold hands' such as Peter Jackson, James Cameron or Spielberg,perhaps. I don't know if they've been read the books and get into them or not..but at least, we'all know how well-directed they are when combining the story(Lord of the Ring), the plot(Indiana Jones), the sci-fi(ET) or even the romance(Titanic and Avatar) into something not only worth-magic beyond the imaginations but they're all,yeah, worth seeing for the audiences (the fans and the outsiders), worth experiences for the casts, and off course definetely great-investments for all those in the principle managements.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
RhiannaJul 3, 2010
honestly, i'm a massive fan. book fan before the movie, anticipated twilight the film as soon as the cast was announced. but eclipse is a thick book and it came out as only a two hour movie. this franchise has die hard fans that will go honestly, i'm a massive fan. book fan before the movie, anticipated twilight the film as soon as the cast was announced. but eclipse is a thick book and it came out as only a two hour movie. this franchise has die hard fans that will go see it at midnight and it was only two hours. i think if they added an extra half an hour into it, they would of had some time for transition scenes. it flicked from one story to the other with no inbetween. it was hard to get into character development because it just chopped and changed. harry potter 2 and 4 did it and they definatly weren't the best ones and i think thats what made eclipse not quite hit home as it should. i still loved it and when you first see jacob in it and the attitude he gave off made me want to switch sides. i think actually the bigger the book the more they freak out about cutting it down. all i can say is thank god the next one is being split. david your direction was excellent though particularly in the fight scenes. perfect touch. and to all the actors awesome. but i also would of been happy if jane asked for bree's name like the book. because it would of been slight aknowledgment of the novella which i thought would of been cool. can't wait for the next one. thank you everyone who brought these to life. they're awesome.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
JesseJ.Jul 4, 2010
Okay, I am going to try and be a little bit more fair to this movie than some people here (especially the ones that give it 10s). This movie is absolutly mediocre, generally mediocre movies are ones you watch any ways just to have a great Okay, I am going to try and be a little bit more fair to this movie than some people here (especially the ones that give it 10s). This movie is absolutly mediocre, generally mediocre movies are ones you watch any ways just to have a great blast (like A Team or Quantum Solace). But this has neither that or a deep understanding story line. Its almost as bad as Romeo and Juliet, a bunch of hormone fueled teenagers who think they are in love. Let me tell you something before we continue folks, there is no such thing as love. Any ways, I think they should've put a gun to Quentin Tarantino's head and told him to write the lines for them because the words they used were almost as bad as The Last Airbender. Over all, average movie, only thing merely good about it is the love between two characters, I never said good, I said merely good. I guess thats the only thing that stands out about it showing how much of a failure it was.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
MadariaAJul 1, 2010
It moved to quickly from one thing to the other and it was nothing like i'd thought it was going to be . Thought it would be more like the book and not just the love gooshy between bella,edward and jacob.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
LynnWJul 1, 2010
I loved Twilight, really liked New Moon, and hated Eclipse. I'm so disappointed. David Slade must have been too far out of his comfort zone. Where were the great action sequences he promised?
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
NicoleJul 2, 2010
The script and actors are it's largest downfault; Edward and Bellas love is frankly unbelievable and just boring.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
EvinCJul 2, 2010
The twilight movies have got interesting. I guess the 3rd time is really a charm. Incredibly better than the 1st 2. And sadly enough one of the better films of the year.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
DeanneTJul 5, 2010
It was better than the first two, but as an overall movie, it was still horrible. Pattinson and Stewart got a little better at becoming their characters, but are still not the world's best.. They do not portray the characters very well.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
MaxAug 20, 2010
There's something highly appealing to the Twilight saga, though I can't put my finger on it. The characters are wooden, the plot is laughable, and the direction is uninspired. Yet I found myself enjoying Eclipse much more than the first two,There's something highly appealing to the Twilight saga, though I can't put my finger on it. The characters are wooden, the plot is laughable, and the direction is uninspired. Yet I found myself enjoying Eclipse much more than the first two, but not for reasons the filmmakers would hope. It's a terrible film, but thoroughly enjoyable if you're in the right mood. Look for all of the intentional and unintentional double-entendres; their inclusion, no matter how immature they may be, are the most enjoyable thing about this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
JularaAug 11, 2010
The film is utter nonsense, acting is horrible and the chemistry between Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner is horrible. I only tolerated this film because I like the books and that's not saying much
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
KundKNov 16, 2010
Parts 2 and 3 of the saga would be terrible if they weren't hilarious in their awfulness. The novels are poorly written tripe, a cut below Barbara Cartland-style romances and that doesn't help things. The movie version accentuates the lack ofParts 2 and 3 of the saga would be terrible if they weren't hilarious in their awfulness. The novels are poorly written tripe, a cut below Barbara Cartland-style romances and that doesn't help things. The movie version accentuates the lack of structure, pacing, unity, rhyme and reason. There's also a pack of Mononoke-huge wolves so that's a plus. Also, no comedy in tha last three year made me laugh as much as Twilight trilogy and although it was unintentionally funny, I respect funny. So... go Bianca and Godfrey and Jimbo, whatever your names are!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
FitriAmirrolNov 19, 2010
Drop the act, people. Eclipse is utter modern vampire love fantasy. Every moment is padded with tacky lines and subpar acting, and had it not been for a couple of entertaining scenes in the last 30 minutes, the whole two hours wouldâ
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
xiuyiwangAug 20, 2010
Love all the parts in the film without Bella and Edward being lovey dovey. Jacob is better in the book. Argh. The scenes for the supporting characters are definitely interesting and the highlight of the film
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Forrestgump1Oct 9, 2010
"It was good not great , very optimistic , the ending felt rushed and unoriginal , the acting was for the most part ok , Eclipse surpasses New Moon , The action sequence at the end was pretty moderate to , all in all this movie is reasonably"It was good not great , very optimistic , the ending felt rushed and unoriginal , the acting was for the most part ok , Eclipse surpasses New Moon , The action sequence at the end was pretty moderate to , all in all this movie is reasonably enjoyable" .. B-… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
iamtrent424Dec 6, 2010
This movie has a nice story and more blood then the last two but could have been better. I been following twilight movies since part one came out and still none of the movies measure up to the first movie. I like this movie but i can't watchThis movie has a nice story and more blood then the last two but could have been better. I been following twilight movies since part one came out and still none of the movies measure up to the first movie. I like this movie but i can't watch it over and over again. This movie isn't the type of movie I could watch over again. I like twilight , but it could be better. This movie is a huge bounce back from new moon. Twilight new moon was a bad movie. I didn't like it at all. This movie is bouncing back to being a good movie. The director did a fine job with putting more blood and gore in this movie. This movie was good but still it could have been better… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Libra85Jan 1, 2011
It's hard to review this movie without mentioning the other two. But I will start by saying this movie is an improvement over the last. And on par with the first. The vampire clan are a really cool set of characters that have some depth. TheIt's hard to review this movie without mentioning the other two. But I will start by saying this movie is an improvement over the last. And on par with the first. The vampire clan are a really cool set of characters that have some depth. The shapeshifters really need to find a shirt. But they aren't terrible. This movie boast some very impressive fight scenes and Alice and Victoria, this time played by Bryce Dallas Howard, look really hot. There're are a few conversations in the movie that made me laugh too. So why the 4, Bella. The whole crappy story is about the most boring and uninteresting charactor in the movie. Why should I or anyone care about who she ends up with? And everything that she said and did was just annoying. This movie is a teenage girls fantasy and I guess that's who I have to be to enjoy it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
JonnyFendiJan 11, 2011
Thiz movie is phenomenal. A lot of movie-critics pout and sneer at thiz romantic flick. But on thiz review, I want to stay neutral and trying to be objective. If you want to be fair, whoever The Director or The Casts, will be getting a hardThiz movie is phenomenal. A lot of movie-critics pout and sneer at thiz romantic flick. But on thiz review, I want to stay neutral and trying to be objective. If you want to be fair, whoever The Director or The Casts, will be getting a hard time to fill viewer great expectation since everyone pays full attention on thiz franchise. The original content wrote by a woman novelist, Stephenie Meyer. Twilight Saga schedules for quadrilogy. I think thiz third constellation is better than the second one, NEW MOON (2009). But the first one TWILIGHT (2008) is still the best bcoz its mysterious atmosphere and great introduction by former Director, Catherine Hardwicke. Thiz time, The Director is David Slade (30 DAYS OF NIGHT (2007)). Thiz sequel has good paces on story-telling. Although some people said the sequences was a little bit slow and boring. But I think if you want to get some precise romantic scenes, thiz is the only way to do it. Slade successfully captures the emotions for some moments with his Close-up cinematography. If we look at the main Casts, Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson) and Isabella Swan (Kristen Stewart) do not show much improvement than before. The better performance belongs to Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner) with his deep gaze. The surprising best performance comes from the supporting Cast, Dakota Fanning as Jane, one of the Volturi members. With her accent tone and body language, Fanning made an incredible vampire aura. The blood-thirsty Jasper character (Jackson Rathbone) annoyed me a little bit. His character evolved too much. In two earlier prequels he is almost invisible, but on thiz third one, he has changed dramatically to become vampire warrior. I observe, Thiz is an odd movie, where girls love it, boys hate it. I hope they did not come to the theater just to see some good-looking faces (I am saying thiz, it is not bcoz I am a Twilighater). In the other hand, if you look inside, no matter how corny the movie is, it will be still a story to tell (I am saying thiz, it is not bcoz my close-one is Twilighter). The formula is repeated very well, Shirtless Werewolf plus Very-cool Vampire plus Girl who cannot even make up her mind, equal to Movie that totally twilight us.

Visit My Blog on JONNY'S MOVEE : http://jonnyfendi.blogspot.com… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
aaronpaul121May 24, 2012
No improvements from the last movie. The plot is still weird and ridiculous. Taylor Lautner is still acting funny rather than dramatic. It still has scenes that doesn't have depth. It still lacks excitement. And it is still a book series thatNo improvements from the last movie. The plot is still weird and ridiculous. Taylor Lautner is still acting funny rather than dramatic. It still has scenes that doesn't have depth. It still lacks excitement. And it is still a book series that wasn't meant to be a movie.....… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Potter17Dec 28, 2011
Certainly, "Eclipse" is a major improvement when it comes about action and romance, but Slade's direction is too apathetic to make this film a thrilling one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
EclectomaniacSep 10, 2011
The best of the three released movies. Even so, it still manages to be pretty bad. With terrible acting, and knowing that Kristen Stewart can do so much better (as evidenced in "The Runaways"), if you're not already a "Twihard," then don't bother.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
TyranianApr 14, 2019
This film exudes stupidity at times and is probably a low point if that's possible.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
imthenoobNov 8, 2012
I am not a Twilight fan boy, I have never read the books nor watched the movies until the part 1 of the fourth book came out. That being said, I didn't mind this movie. Only bad thing about the acting was that Lautner sucked, Did not care forI am not a Twilight fan boy, I have never read the books nor watched the movies until the part 1 of the fourth book came out. That being said, I didn't mind this movie. Only bad thing about the acting was that Lautner sucked, Did not care for him at all. I like how they explained more of the characters' history as well. Also, I find this movie as well as the book a rather pointless journey. It would have been easier to kill off Victoria in the first book, deal with Bella's decision between Edward and Jacob in the second, then get married in the third. It just seemed like such a pointless journey especially when we all know how it's gonna play out (even if this wasn't based on a book series, It was rather predictable on who she was gonna choose in the end). Again, it was not that bad. A little predictable but I didn't mind it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Jeramyd69Jun 24, 2012
Bella, just get a life or end it. We are all just done. Kind of visually stunning film. That's pretty much I and everyone else can say...

Also Bella, it wouldn't hurt to surprise us all with a different facial expression...maybe?
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
dev92Aug 24, 2012
Despite the fact that I despise these films, I thought that Eclipse was fairly viewable. There was more action which was desperately needed in the previous film whilst the storyline was half decent. It still seems to lack imagination in termsDespite the fact that I despise these films, I thought that Eclipse was fairly viewable. There was more action which was desperately needed in the previous film whilst the storyline was half decent. It still seems to lack imagination in terms of direction and also is acted fairly poorly. It is almost like the production company has decided that they barely need to try considering the fact that they are almost guaranteed the money. I can't blame them if I am honest.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
YoursTrulyNov 21, 2012
Suffers from the noticeably lazy writing and insufferable, repetitive dialog that comes with movies about fanatic teen pop culture trends. So, basically the same type of sh*t you could expect from the Twilight series. But the characterSuffers from the noticeably lazy writing and insufferable, repetitive dialog that comes with movies about fanatic teen pop culture trends. So, basically the same type of sh*t you could expect from the Twilight series. But the character development is a little stronger, it's shot competently, and it's got some action, emotion and anticipation. An enjoyable flick...but nothing to remember.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
worleyjamersDec 8, 2012
Almost everything about this film was a major improvement upon the first two installments, but I had a real hard time getting into this one; I found it to be slow, uneventful, and surprisingly boring.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
WiesyApr 5, 2013
This movie is the best of the saga, there is action in it and now the actors say something when there is happenings nothing. Thae actors can be better and the story is better then the outer twilight movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
LoRevisorJan 8, 2015
Para minha alegria deixa lua nova no chinelo e passa crepúsculo por um ponto.Já que nesse temos ação e momentos mais legais mas mesmo assim não chega a ser um grande e excelente filme só razoável.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
DibbHansenJul 18, 2013
An interesting and beautifully filmed third installment of the Twilight saga, which is not as bad as everyone says it is. It is entertaining, some dull acting (Pattinson especially), but the visuals are great and the battle at the end isAn interesting and beautifully filmed third installment of the Twilight saga, which is not as bad as everyone says it is. It is entertaining, some dull acting (Pattinson especially), but the visuals are great and the battle at the end is very entertaining. I enjoyed this movie and have enjoyed how the story is unfolding on the big screen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
bfoore90Jul 12, 2020
An improvement over the second one but not by much. The direction, acting and setting is solid but the problem with these movies is pretty much the screenplay. The main symphosis states, "she is forced to choose between her love for EdwardAn improvement over the second one but not by much. The direction, acting and setting is solid but the problem with these movies is pretty much the screenplay. The main symphosis states, "she is forced to choose between her love for Edward and her friendship with Jacob — knowing that her decision has the potential to ignite the ageless struggle between vampire and werewolf. With her graduation quickly approaching, Bella is confronted with the most important decision of her life" but it's not really presented as much of a struggle. Theres maybe a couple lines, a couple scenes where Jacob seems credible but it's not enough to where you actually think she's going to choose Jacob over Edward. Not a bad film, but had the screenplay and writing had taken advantage of missed opportunities it could have been better… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
chwJul 20, 2014
I actually enjoyed this. It wasn't fabulous, but it wasn't so much as the other Twilight movies. It didn't have any ridiculous lines that were ridiculously acted like in the others.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
diogomendesAug 1, 2014
While it could've been far worse than what the audience was expecting, "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse" is still a failure in cinematic terms and only devoted fanboys/fangirls will find satisfaction.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JohnMasterLAug 7, 2015
Es superior en la mayoría de los aspectos que su antecesora, Eclipse es un capitulo "relleno" que no aporta ninguna novedad a la historia, la batalla final no es épica o increíble, pero es pasable... Un capitulo sin muchas sorpresas que llegaEs superior en la mayoría de los aspectos que su antecesora, Eclipse es un capitulo "relleno" que no aporta ninguna novedad a la historia, la batalla final no es épica o increíble, pero es pasable... Un capitulo sin muchas sorpresas que llega al punto de ser un poco aburrida y tediosa.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LinttaFlamingoNov 18, 2016
While Eclipse is a HUGE improvement over the overly serious New Moon, with real action this time and a more relaxed tone and character development, it still has the same love triangle continuing and the usual protect Bella and kill the badWhile Eclipse is a HUGE improvement over the overly serious New Moon, with real action this time and a more relaxed tone and character development, it still has the same love triangle continuing and the usual protect Bella and kill the bad vampires stuff.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
JosephASowellJun 5, 2015
It is a huge improvement on this franchise. For one, it actually has a plot, and though its performances are still terrible, it offers a little bit more than the first two films
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
JPKDec 7, 2019
Better Than New Moon
New Moon was pretty bad so I had low expectations, But honestly, Eclipse is okay, Not perfect, But fine.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
alexandreaNov 29, 2021
How can this be considered the best by the critics? It´s easily the second worst, it loses all the charm th first two had.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
FilipeNetoMar 25, 2020
Darker, with more action, it keeps the level of the previous films, which is not a very good thing.

This film was based on a series of "best seller" books about the romance between a vampire and a young human. I never read the books (nor doDarker, with more action, it keeps the level of the previous films, which is not a very good thing.

This film was based on a series of "best seller" books about the romance between a vampire and a young human. I never read the books (nor do I intend to), but if Edward and Bella's love story was supposed to be epic, something didn't work. Despite this, this film was a box office champion, the teenagers consumed it well and the studio rubbed their hands in satisfaction, just as with the two previous films.

The plot boils down to this: again together, Edward and Bella look happy, but a succession of mysterious murders in neighboring Seattle indicates that Victoria, the couple's enemy, may be trying to raise an army of newly created vampires, which may endanger the entire Cullen clan and also Jacob's pack. On the other hand, the threat of the Volturi to interfere hangs over everyone and Bella doesn't seem to know how to deal with Jacob, in love with her, and whom she doesn't want to hurt.

Again we saw a change in the director's chair, with the arrival of David Slade. From a distance, we saw an improvement in direction with his arrival, showing the lack of capacity of its previous occupants. There is an improvement in the environment and in the story told, which becomes more profound and involving as the danger and the action become more and more present in the film. The fight scenes are very good, but very fast, which helped the film acquire a somewhat uneven pace, with fast scenes and much slower sequences. In addition, there are still serious problems inherited from previous films and which are closely linked to the way the actors behaved.

In fact, each film accentuates the feeling that Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson were gross casting errors and never adapted well to the characters and each other. There is almost no chemistry between them, despite an improvement in the dialogues and the story told. Their characters' romance no longer seems like a childish crush, as in the previous two films, but it is still a long way from looking as breathtaking as it was supposed to. With the exception of some very concrete scenes, there is no involvement or depth in the way both actors worked, and the romantic scenes seem like pauses in which we can disconnect a little from what we are seeing and, for example, go to the bathroom for a minute. . Taylor Lautner is good, but not as good as in the previous film, where he had more presence and showed more talent. Bryce Dallas Howard was a pretty good Victoria and a convincing villain. Billy Burke and Ashley Greene are very good and maintain the level they had so far.

Technically, the film maintains the good CGI, visible in the work of the wolves and in the extraordinarily choreographed action scenes. Howard Shore's soundtrack is very good, dark in the right measure and helped keep the soundtrack as one of the best strengths of the films in this tetralogy. Good scenarios, props, and very good large-scale images of cold and snowy landscapes complete the technical work.

This film is the darkest and most serious in tetralogy, but also the one that gives the audience the most action. We continue to face a dull story, but the introduction of these elements was welcome and helped the film to become more palatable and less boring.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
ErikTheCriticSep 29, 2018
Despite an improvement over the god-awful "New Moon", this third instalment is still filled with wooden acting, and a poor attempt at blending fantasy action and romance together.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Sosmooth1982Jan 13, 2023
A little better of a movie from the last one. Bella is still being pursued and now they have her scent and she has to make some tough decisions. There is at least some action in this one, instead of just their boring love story.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

58 Critic Reviews

5.1 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL