The Rite

New Line Cinema | Release Date: January 28, 2011

5.5	USER SCORE Mixed or average reviews based on 134 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

GlitterAug 30, 2013

Two hours of a Vatican infomercial, as presented by Colin O'Donoghue's sideburns and Anthony Hopkins lack of interest. Featuring cats, frogs, demons, and blaspheming soon-to-be priests, The Rite works best at dedicating itself as a paidTwo hours of a Vatican infomercial, as presented by Colin O'Donoghue's sideburns and Anthony Hopkins lack of interest. Featuring cats, frogs, demons, and blaspheming soon-to-be priests, The Rite works best at dedicating itself as a paid sponsorship for your own future exorcism. Perhaps you should also invest in a lawyer, suing for fraud in false advertising as a Horror film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

BartJan 29, 2011

By half way through the film I was ready to start worshiping Satan if he would bring the film to an end quicker. What a waste of a talented actor on a real stinker of a script. If I had to point a finger at the cause on this piece of crud,By half way through the film I was ready to start worshiping Satan if he would bring the film to an end quicker. What a waste of a talented actor on a real stinker of a script. If I had to point a finger at the cause on this piece of crud, it would be at the writer.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

boxenford92May 14, 2011

I was somewhat disappointed with the final product of this old story but i still enjoyed the hell out of it. Anthony Hopkins did a great job in my opinion. And Mikael Hafstrom was a perfect fit for directing this material

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Spielberg00Dec 2, 2011

Bottom Line: Dumb, demonic, and unintentionally funny. Passing recommended.

Welcome to the twenty-first century. Or the cinematic era when nearly every horror film HAS to revolve around either â

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

MeritCobaJun 5, 2019

Possibly the most unsettling part of this movie about exorcisms is at the end. We are told that the structural abuse of hapless victims, condoned by the Catholic Church, is not only a continued practice today, but is seen as somethingPossibly the most unsettling part of this movie about exorcisms is at the end. We are told that the structural abuse of hapless victims, condoned by the Catholic Church, is not only a continued practice today, but is seen as something warranting praise. At least enough to make a movie about it that proclaims such abuse as a good thing. So we are told that one victim was starved of water and food for eight weeks before the devil was driven out. This might be a case of: operation successful; patient died. We aren't offered details. But it is even worse. It isn't just condoned: the Church has actually a list of official exorcists and a training program that teaches this stuff to promising priests.
One of those promising priest is our main lead, who is actually a doubting Thomas. Only in this case he is called Michael. Doubting Michael turns priest because, according to him, it is the only other alternative to becoming a mortician. And as Doubting Michael wanted to be away from his parental home, seminary school was the way to go. Believing in the almighty daddy isn't sufficient reason in fact. God doesn't hold any sway in this movie about driving out the devil through abuse.

In all irony, the portraying of the opportunistic Michael as agnostic, if not downright as an atheist, who wings it through seminary school backfires as it shows that the Catholic Church is bereft of a functional selection mechanism when picking priests and just about anyone can get A grades and get handpicked for the elite exorcists training course irrespective of the strength of their convictions. But to top it all: the years of seminary school does nothing to sway Doubting Michael one way or the other. He is as unconvinced about the Catholic truth at the end as he is at the start. Seminary school fails to turn doubters into believers. It attest to its utter failure as an institution. The proof is in the pudding.

I see something special in you, says some teacher of his, just when the main lead is about to hand in his collar as it was never about becoming a priest. And in the next scene he finds himself signed up to a satan kicker course over in Rome. What that special is(it isn't the fervor of his belief) goes undemonstrated. You might even say that there is more evidence for the contrary as the whole time our hero demonstrates his disbelief. It is like saying that a guy wearing coke-bottle glasses must make an excellent sniper, without showing his accuracy in previous scenes and him refusing to even touch a weapon out of principle. I guess we just believe it without evidence.. shall we? It is what religion is about.

Now I can't fault you for thinking that from reading the above that it must be a comedy, but it really isn't. It is nothing more that a straight telling without any mirth. The whole thing is about the exorcisms and the script rushes towards that part and just gives us a cursory nod towards establishing a background and personality for the lead. Since Hopkins has enough personality upon entry without any need of establishment, the difference between him and the lead is so great that you can drive a truck through it, sideways. Was there anyone else in the room? Or even the picture? Even the extras and the support cast have more personality than Doubting Michael. Of course, we all known that this lack isn't surprising as Michael isn't a real person. He is the stand in for all the doubters and atheists who will become believers overnight when confronted by an 88 mm gun.. eh the evils of Satan, just like Michael is. There are no atheists in foxholes! Funny enough, at best the movie demonstrates that a being named Ba'al exists. If you take that to be proof that god exists, this is because you have been doggy-trained to make that connection. Turning a believer because of an illogical conclusion or because you are afraid doesn't say anything about existence of the almighty. In rational reality it is more likely that any sane person, whether atheist or not, will prefer to have the victims transported to the nearest decent hospital, Hopkins incarcerated for his own good and that of societies, and the Catholic Church outlawed until they stop actively supporting this kind of abuse. Like that will be the day!

A remarkably disturbing movie that confronts you with the fact that while witch hunts and burning heretics has seen better days, institutional craziness and abuse is still rife in the Catholic Church. It once more shows how well-meaning people can do evil things if they just believe hard enough that their delusion is factual and they have movies telling them so.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

LoRevisorJan 28, 2015

Religião ah sim religião nem pra filme essa porcaria serve,Anthony Hopkins arrasa com sua super atuação e é tremendamente engraçado nas suas quase últimas falas no filme,mas esse filme é idiota,besta,inúltil enfim igual a religião.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

BroyaxJan 22, 2017

A première vue, l'approche "réaliste" (un bien grand mot pour ce folklore de dévôts) ou à tout le moins sceptique est intéressante. Ainsi ce jeune prêtre en formation qui doute et suit un vieux de la vieille dans ses exorcismes hebdomadairesA première vue, l'approche "réaliste" (un bien grand mot pour ce folklore de dévôts) ou à tout le moins sceptique est intéressante. Ainsi ce jeune prêtre en formation qui doute et suit un vieux de la vieille dans ses exorcismes hebdomadaires à Rome, ville bénie de Sa Sainteté et sanctuaire séculaire du catholicisme.

Puis, comme il est décidément impossible de résister (la voie du Malin sans doute), le film se vautre dans la foire des clichés mâchés et remâchés de l'exorcisme au cinéma (cf L'Exorciste, l'un des pères fondateurs) un cortège de simagrées, un florilège de contorsions et toutes les litanies qui s'ensuivent. Par ailleurs, les lenteurs sont légion, ce qui n'aide pas un film déjà passablement mollasson.

Anthony Hopkins tire toujours son épingle du jeu mais cela ne suffit pas pour absoudre cette ridicule diablerie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews