The Rage: Carrie 2

United Artists | Release Date: March 12, 1999

4.0	USER SCORE Mixed or average reviews based on 159 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

FilipeNetoJul 8, 2018

Making a sequel to a famous movie shouldn't be only an excuse to make a movie but that's what we have here. "Carrie" was a remarkable film when it debuted but was being forgotten over time. This was a sequel attempt but any resemblance toMaking a sequel to a famous movie shouldn't be only an excuse to make a movie but that's what we have here. "Carrie" was a remarkable film when it debuted but was being forgotten over time. This was a sequel attempt but any resemblance to "Carrie" is mere coincidence, as it repeats the same story with another girl, Rachael Lang, blending everything with the usual ingredients of the obnoxious teen movies. And just like "Carrie" or any slasher teen movie, everything ends in carnage, with gore to the liking of teenagers without brains and who use their genitals to think. Boring and predictable are two adjectives we can use for it Frankenstein plot, as strange as the breeding of a mare with a zebra. The ending is rather exaggerated and forced. The main character, Rachael, never really gets connected with the public, so her life or death is something that doesn't bother us. The film makes a lot of effort to look scary but it's like a magician show: huge show off that brings nothing new. The actors aren't necessarily good but their work is OK. Conclusion: Its a teenage film that is on the borderline between mediocre and bearable, using the fame of an old film in an inglorious way.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

Spielberg00Nov 14, 2011

Bottom Line: Irrelevant to the classic, a good one for even Carrie fans to skip.

Itâ

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

barnet42Oct 18, 2013

I give 2 for this movie it wasn't too bad to be a Sequel and Carrie 2013 is the same movie as Carrie 2002 Bad acting and i'm sure they make another remake movie of Carrie in 4 years

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

DollisOct 22, 2012

There is nothing worse than watching a bad movie while being constantly reminded of a great one , Wait for another Carrie movie this is the 4th movie Carrie 2013 , The Carrie 2013 is gonna be the same as Carrie 2002.There is nothing worse than watching a bad movie while being constantly reminded of a great one , Wait for another Carrie movie this is the 4th movie Carrie 2013 , The Carrie 2013 is gonna be the same as Carrie 2002. http://www.facebook.com/ElvisPresleySonElvisAaronPresleyJr… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

mijxeroFeb 13, 2014

I really liked this movie. It brought a new spin from the original while still maintaining the essence of a revenge movie. Both films were very enjoyable and I got what I asked for in a sequel, a lot of the same with a new coat of paint.I really liked this movie. It brought a new spin from the original while still maintaining the essence of a revenge movie. Both films were very enjoyable and I got what I asked for in a sequel, a lot of the same with a new coat of paint. If you loved the first one and are hoping for something completely different you will be disappointed.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

PanchogulJun 24, 2021

La original Carrie estuvo llena de magia y esplendor, era de esperarse que una secuela genérica y cargada de estereotipos no iba a dar buenos frutos, pero rescato lo bueno, la chica que hizo de Rachel estuvo bastante bien en comparación delLa original Carrie estuvo llena de magia y esplendor, era de esperarse que una secuela genérica y cargada de estereotipos no iba a dar buenos frutos, pero rescato lo bueno, la chica que hizo de Rachel estuvo bastante bien en comparación del resto de personajes, el personaje de Sue fue mero fan service y pasó sin pena de gloria, pero al menos es una película bastante entretenida como mucho.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

Rcavey92212Mar 15, 2020

So I saw this film in theaters when it was first released in 1999. Despite the overall quality of it, I really connected to it. I found Rachel played by the than unknown Emily Bergyl ( Marvelous Mrs. Maisel to be very relatable. And the wholeSo I saw this film in theaters when it was first released in 1999. Despite the overall quality of it, I really connected to it. I found Rachel played by the than unknown Emily Bergyl ( Marvelous Mrs. Maisel to be very relatable. And the whole love affair with football stud Jessie played by a sexy Jason London to be quite the tragedy like Romeo and Juliet. I was also obsessed with the finale look and even copied it into a boy version for Halloween that year. Also I was bullied alot in school and really liked how she got back at all the kids who tortured her. That being said watching it all these years later. I find it kind of lifetime moviesh. It's a bad film with decent performances and a super bad ass finale which has Rachel's tattoo growing into a sort of tribal vine that flows with her power. The religious stuff feels a little forced as does the Sue character which Amy Irving reprises. It doesn't come close to being anywhere near it's Superior predecessor but it doesn't feel completely unnecessary. I do feel like it was a decent effort to explore the teen angst of it's time period but none of the characters or storyline are fleshed out enough to be truly memorable. As it stands, it's a somewhat entertaining, overly mediocre genre flick of the 90s.

3/5… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

JakeH.Feb 7, 2008

Ok this film is basically a remake but it brings forward the ideas of past generations into the now was presently surprised by this film would have liked a bit more fresh material but the again don't fix what isn't broken also star Ok this film is basically a remake but it brings forward the ideas of past generations into the now was presently surprised by this film would have liked a bit more fresh material but the again don't fix what isn't broken also star Emily Bergl manages to easily portray her character and would have liked it to have delved deeper into the troubled Rachel White as This actress has the skills and talent to handle a role like this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

maskedrider29Oct 24, 2022

This is a guilty pleasure of mine. I know it's bad, I know it was an unecessary sequel, that no one was asking for, but I think it's a movie that is so bad, it's good. I do enjoy this movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews