Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) | Release Date: June 28, 2000
6.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 184 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
124
Mixed:
35
Negative:
25
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
1
JonAOct 14, 2005
The dialog is so embarressingly corny that my father and i laughed at scenes that were suppose to be heartbreaking. some of the action scenes were alright looking but we've seen it all before, truly awful.
2 of 2 users found this helpful
1
dxnldJun 23, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Perhaps the most horrendous depiction of 'history' I've ever witnessed. Never, ever, in all my days, have I seen a movie so reckless in it's portrayal of history. The first problem the movie contains is a lack of any recognition of Slavery in America. The main character is based of a revolutionary hero who, owned, raped and killed his slaves as he wished. In fact American Slavery is completely ignored and the arrogant slave owning masters are now British... Just bizarre. The second problem lies in the portrayal of the British Army as Nazi's. A war crime is created (the burning church scene) in order to paint the British as monsters. This event did actually happen might I point out, in 1944 by the Nazis against a French town, literally making the British Appear as Nazis! People do take away lessons from movies and the blatant Anglo-Phobia and rampant lies this movie sells, in a shocking attempt to shove propaganda down your throat, making me feel physically sick.

I mean the battle scenes were good I guess so 10/10
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
NeedForsleepAug 19, 2014
Such a great movie the story is awesome alot of action and every fight scene is dramatic the characters are great Mel gibson and Jason issacs are both really great actors who made this movie alot better! one of my favorite movies of all time!
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Voodoo123Aug 4, 2018
Throw the history books away and feel immersed in a dogmatically written somewhat overlong story of Americas revolutionary period tweaked to full action film mode. 2000's the patriot is beautifully shot with a rousing Jwilliams soundtrack andThrow the history books away and feel immersed in a dogmatically written somewhat overlong story of Americas revolutionary period tweaked to full action film mode. 2000's the patriot is beautifully shot with a rousing Jwilliams soundtrack and excellent cast with good pacing and style. Was suprised it didn't fare better on release and with the critics back in the day but for my money its worth a watch for the cheesy feel good factor alone! Jason Isaac's Tavington ia almost as special as Alan Rickman's sheriff of Nottingham.... almost.... Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Meth-dudeAug 8, 2018
Although it is very cheesy and melodramatic, it's still a solid movie. The acting is great, the cinematography is beautiful, the fight sequences are quite spectacular and despite it's rather long running time, it still manages to beAlthough it is very cheesy and melodramatic, it's still a solid movie. The acting is great, the cinematography is beautiful, the fight sequences are quite spectacular and despite it's rather long running time, it still manages to be entertaining all the way through. If you're looking for a good, historical, war drama you will probably enjoy the movie. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
FilipeNetoJun 28, 2018
Roland Emmerich saw Mel Gibson's "Braveheart" and what did he do? He thought the US should have its own Braveheart and called Gibson to help, giving him the lead role. This film begins badly: as I had occasion to refer to when I reviewedRoland Emmerich saw Mel Gibson's "Braveheart" and what did he do? He thought the US should have its own Braveheart and called Gibson to help, giving him the lead role. This film begins badly: as I had occasion to refer to when I reviewed "Braveheart", Gibson's film is terribly bad as far as historical accuracy is concerned, however appealing and cinematic it may be (and it is, its undoubtedly epic). This film is unfortunately not better, at least historically and with regard to the English, who are portrayed in an almost insulting way. Okay, there are atrocities in war but everything has limits, and the British still had, at this time, a mentality very much for the gentlemen's war, at least the officers. I accept the argument that its fiction and not a documentary, but even if it is, it should respect more its historical background. I believe that many Englishmen did not accept the way this film portrayed their army. Despite this, the film has some historically correct details, as is the case with all the well built and elegant colonial settings and the costumes, in particular the military uniforms. The way the soldiers fought, quite formal in its essence, is also historically accurate. As a piece of entertainment, the movie works well. The epic way it was designed is nice, looks great in movies and even on TV. It has an extraordinary soundtrack by John Williams and cinematography, colorful and vivid, looks great. I also give a word of praise to the actors, Mel Gibson particularly. This actor had an interpretive tone very similar to what he kept in "Braveheart" but without that horrible fake Scottish accent. Here, Gibson seems more at ease with his character, a man seeking personal revenge in the midst of all the conflict he engages in. Heath Ledger, still young, also gives serious evidence of talent. Joely Richardson and Tom Wilkinson met what was expected of them, even though their characters did not require much. Jason Isaacs gave life to the villain and, although his character is not credible at all, he can be very sadistic and scary, showing the cruelest side of the war. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
PlutoIcecreamMay 31, 2021
Yeah, it was pretty dang good. This film was extremely satisfying with good character arcs and it instills patriotism.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
VirtualnerdMar 21, 2023
One of the greatest American movies ever made. There has been a great anti-American effort to slander this movie, but you can be assured this is one of the best movies you will ever watch. Stellar acting, epic action, and excellent pacing.One of the greatest American movies ever made. There has been a great anti-American effort to slander this movie, but you can be assured this is one of the best movies you will ever watch. Stellar acting, epic action, and excellent pacing. For sure worth a watch... or two... or every year! Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
2
G_Thomas_BostonApr 25, 2013
Director Roland Emmerich plus music by John "The Big Schmaltzy" Williams plus screenwriter Robert Rodat (Saving Private Ryan) plus Mel Gibson equals Overblown Hollywood Wanna-Be Epic

There was so much slow motion in this film that if the
Director Roland Emmerich plus music by John "The Big Schmaltzy" Williams plus screenwriter Robert Rodat (Saving Private Ryan) plus Mel Gibson equals Overblown Hollywood Wanna-Be Epic

There was so much slow motion in this film that if the director had shot the scenes in real time, this 2 hour and 45 minutes of torture would have ran (mercifully) about 12 minutes.
Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
3
LansdenrsJun 3, 2013
I can't believe people think this is good. Acting wasnt great moments are stretched and I felt like I was watching a soap opera. Every scene has someone crying. By the end of it I was bored.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
0
PaulHOct 14, 2005
I really really hated this movie, that's the only thing i can even think to say about it.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
1
CatDec 2, 2006
Terrible movie...the best part was the costumes. Virtually plotless, blatantly pandering, and more like the real Mel Gibson than the real American Revolution, shall we say.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
8
JPKMar 6, 2018
Good History Film
It's No Masterpiece, But It Successfully Shows An Important Time In American History.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
CRLSep 28, 2011
The Patriot is a little too long, a little too predictable, a little too ahistorical, and a little too focused on bloody battles, revenge-fueled plot lines, and slow-motion fights to be truly enjoyable. However the excellent performancesThe Patriot is a little too long, a little too predictable, a little too ahistorical, and a little too focused on bloody battles, revenge-fueled plot lines, and slow-motion fights to be truly enjoyable. However the excellent performances turned in by all of its actors (especially Jason Isaacs) and it's occasionally enjoyable cinematography make it a watchable yet typical Mel Gibson flick. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
1
pauljohnsonNov 23, 2011
Totally predictable "one man's revenge" melodrama plot. Some outrageous moments that are so hard to swallow, and are obviously designed to tug at the patriotic heart strings of Americans. The dialogue was horribly written and so obviouslyTotally predictable "one man's revenge" melodrama plot. Some outrageous moments that are so hard to swallow, and are obviously designed to tug at the patriotic heart strings of Americans. The dialogue was horribly written and so obviously scripted you could tell even the best of actors were struggling to deliver it convincingly. Almost no attention is paid through the entire movie to fleshing out the characters beyond a bit of their back stories and roles in the film. Heath Ledger is completely wasted in this thing, and Mel Gibson delivers the same bland performance as he does in any other movie; in fact during an ambush scene in the forest, I had trouble telling his character apart from the trees, his performance was that wooden.

The movie relies on so painfully obvious set ups, story twists and cringe worthy cliches, that it makes you want to stop the movie so you can go to the bathroom and vomit. A complete disservice to the memory of the Revolutionaries. Congratulations, George Washington, you and your men's cause has been boiled down to a pathetic, cliched, pandering, unconvincing, shocking manipulative excuse for a film. Roland Emerich, stop making movies. You cannot direct.
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
Spielberg00Dec 2, 2011
Bottom Line: Mel Gibson is a powerful war hero in Roland Emmerichâ
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
saccyindJul 29, 2011
The Best Roland Emmerich Film.The Best Film On American War Of Independence The Best Acting Work Of Mel Gibson Overall The Patriot Is A Great Film.Definitely In My Top 10

10/10.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
poily45May 26, 2011
The greatest movie i have ever seen Great cast Great STORY Great action AND drama !!!! well DONE one of my favourites! it is phenomenal, fantastic and surprisingly a GREAT romance between the two characters!!!
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
9
MithaqDec 31, 2013
Epic Movie, i think it deserve a better rating.
This movie shows you how horrible the revolutionary war was, and how many Innocent People Died at that time.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
TyranianApr 12, 2019
Really good Gibson film with strong acting and epic scope, plus Ledger and Isaacs are excellent.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
beingryanjudeAug 24, 2014
One of the most spectacular depictions of early wartime America. Roland Emmerich creates an inspiring epic. Not often does a story and performance allow us to deem a fictional character a true hero. We must thank Mel Gibson for that. On topOne of the most spectacular depictions of early wartime America. Roland Emmerich creates an inspiring epic. Not often does a story and performance allow us to deem a fictional character a true hero. We must thank Mel Gibson for that. On top of that, Jason Isaacs proves himself as one of the most treacherous villains. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
DibbHansenJul 18, 2013
A very well written script full of emotional context and intensity that makes it all feel real. The acting in this film is applaudable and the music is sensational (John Williams does it full of heart and patriotism). The film isA very well written script full of emotional context and intensity that makes it all feel real. The acting in this film is applaudable and the music is sensational (John Williams does it full of heart and patriotism). The film is beautifully filmed and really makes you appreciate the sacrifices of the people who helped form this amazing free country. Amazing film. Best historical war film out there. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
GanstersOct 19, 2013
Compelling. Values. One could only live long enough to experience life long tragedy, prosperity and conflicts to understand this story's meaning. Great actors. There is a long list of experienced and new a great actors.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
notlawMay 5, 2016
Another awesome movie from back when mel used to smash them outta the park. Fantastic story great action all round and set in a very interesting time for the world.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
kyle20ellisMar 28, 2022
I'll start with the good things, the scenery, costumes and cinematography are fabulous, the battle sequences are very well staged and the score is wonderful. However, everything else didn't work for me. The film does suffer from a number ofI'll start with the good things, the scenery, costumes and cinematography are fabulous, the battle sequences are very well staged and the score is wonderful. However, everything else didn't work for me. The film does suffer from a number of things(similar problems I had with Braveheart actually), and the historical inaccuracy is pretty much the least of its problems. This film does distort history, and badly, but it also suffers from too many subplots that prove superfluous in some cases, trite dialogue that make little impact and a truly pantomimic villain played by the usually excellent Jason Isaacs. The direction is nothing special, the pacing is too slow and the film is 10 minutes too long. The acting is lacking too, Mel Gibson tries hard with a very one-dimensional and unlikeable character but he struggles. In fact, only Heath Ledger gives a glimmer of hope and that is because he is the only character you feel sympathy for. Overall, I tried to like it, but too many flaws brought it down. 3/10 Bethany Cox Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
viuuiuvyDec 2, 2015
A violent, bloody, and evil movie. What a shame that someone had to make something so gory & weird. This movie is seriously way too violent & bizarre.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
timoneJul 17, 2019
Okay so I know what people are thinking if I was going to review The Patriot when they're thinking about the Steven Seagal version of The Patriot which has nothing to do with historical Revolutionary War. Mel Gibson gained on BraveheartOkay so I know what people are thinking if I was going to review The Patriot when they're thinking about the Steven Seagal version of The Patriot which has nothing to do with historical Revolutionary War. Mel Gibson gained on Braveheart before this came out. Why did I say that? It's because the battle scenes are similar. Hey, I haven't seen it I just know it. Mel Gibson plays Benjamin Martin the veteran of the French and Indian War and a widowed father of seven children. He refuses to go to war but his eldest son, Gabriel played by Heath Ledger goes to war to join the Continentals against his father's wishes. Colonel William Tavington played by Jason Isaacs and his army of British redcoats arrive to the house, captured Gabriel, Thomas tried to stopped them but is shot dead by Tavington calling him a stupid boy. So when their house got burned down, it's up to Benjamin to take down the redcoats. He and Gabriel joined up with his army of friends to take down a bunch of British redcoats once of for all to protect their family. So it's not that long for an epic war film but it does have some slow-paced moments that do fit for some part. As much as I enjoyed most of the action in the war it gets bloody. What people like especially women is the costume design. But there's only one scene that got to me in tears is where Benjamin's daughter, Susan telling him not to leave and she'll say anything he wants but he promises her he'll be back. That scene gets me anytime it gets emotional. I'm not gonna lie, it really did get me. Years ago this is something I checked out before I checked out the Lethal Weapon films now that's saying something 'cause I said before that Mel Gibson is one of my favourite actors of all time. I know there are people out there who don't really like the movie mainly because of it's antics of the American's hatred on the British and the Britain's hatred on the Americans especially when those redcoat b*****d's murdering innocent people, destroying their homes and families. But I'm not one of those people who hate this film, I liked it. It may not historically accurate but it is a fantastic war film with some good cinematography which really made the film look real in the war. Actually I heard somebody in the film mention the word "accurate". Mel Gibson, his character said it and the second time somebody else said it. Well, that's just the fact. I'd say give it a watch if you haven't already. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
gracjanskiDec 28, 2020
I liked how this movie showed some guerilla tactics against a Goliath of an enemy and also how to counter it. Other than that the movie is on a top level also: the equipment, the actors.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Kai82Nov 29, 2020
Basically this is a weaker version of Braveheart adapted to the American Revolutionary War. If you do not believe me just make a comparison from characters, motivations and story arcs. It is the story of Benjamin Martin played by Mel GibsonBasically this is a weaker version of Braveheart adapted to the American Revolutionary War. If you do not believe me just make a comparison from characters, motivations and story arcs. It is the story of Benjamin Martin played by Mel Gibson who is a former soldier who is dragged into the Revolutionary war by dire circumstances and with this also the story of the war and struggles. Within. While the character is fictional I learned recently that he is also a mixture of historical characters. Again it is the Hollywood version of events full of emotion, glory and black and white morality. The truth is less nice but never point this out to US citizens as it is glorified and nearly a dogma. The reality was grim as there is no glory in war and both sides committed horrible crimes (which is a textbook definition for war by itself). However this is an entertainment movie and not a documentary so for me it does not influence my rating. I am not sure if it is as intense and emotional for non Americans as me. To shorten it the movie uses all the techniques to get immersion like Braveheart. This is show not tell, giving emotional impact, make the bad guys (enjoyable) evil, great scenery and breathtaking battles. However I think they have overdone it as there is to much pathos, patriotism and melodrama. It weakened the experience as it gave sometimes a disbelieving feeling that got me out of the immersion. There is nothing for me to criticize for the actors. The cast is well chosen and delivers their roles. I will praise Mel Gibson and Jason Isaacs as best performers in this movie. Both accomplish each other as their respective antagonists / nemesis. There are also some good jokes sparingly used in the movie. The main question that remains is why does this movie not work as good as Braveheart does? For me it is mostly that they overdone some aspects and we have seen it done better in other movies (The Braveheart comparison and similarity did also not help). Maybe Roland Emmerich is not as good as director too but I must remark that I see also no serious mistakes. Overall it is enjoyable but fast forgotten movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
homer4presidentApr 29, 2015
Cliched to the max but still undeniably likable due to Emmerich's sound direction (the only time I can say that, since his other movies are mostly terrible) and a star performance from Mel Gibson. Heath Ledger also gives a memorable turn asCliched to the max but still undeniably likable due to Emmerich's sound direction (the only time I can say that, since his other movies are mostly terrible) and a star performance from Mel Gibson. Heath Ledger also gives a memorable turn as Gibson's oldest son. Sure, the battle between Gibson and bad-guy Isaacs is completely Hollywood-ized, but the end result is absolutely satisfying. The acting is a cut above the norm, thanks to four terrific talents such as Gibson, Ledger, Chris Cooper, and Tom Wilkinson being in the cast, and the result is a well-constructed American epic that deserves a view Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FuturedirectorApr 25, 2016
An inflammatory, bloody and well-made picture, where the cast fights against a mound of melodramatic characters and a surprisingly corny-written script.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
alejandro970Feb 27, 2021
Emmerich compensates for the fiasco made with Godzilla (1998) with a plot of historical context that at least does not pretend to be totally attached to the mold, combining a filial love story. The climax battle takes the entire movie, whichEmmerich compensates for the fiasco made with Godzilla (1998) with a plot of historical context that at least does not pretend to be totally attached to the mold, combining a filial love story. The climax battle takes the entire movie, which can be seen with pleasure. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
sooper_walrusAug 29, 2017
The Patriot is hard for me to review, because it has received a lot of negative attention for being historically inaccurate and allegedly "pandering" to americans by making the British characters unrealistically evil. I agree that the movieThe Patriot is hard for me to review, because it has received a lot of negative attention for being historically inaccurate and allegedly "pandering" to americans by making the British characters unrealistically evil. I agree that the movie is, at times, far too exaggerated in many ways. I also concede that the movie has many glaring inaccuracies. However, I still enjoyed The Patriot immensely as a film. The acting by Gibson and Ledger is, of course, fantastic. The antagonist, played brilliantly by Jason Isaacs, is an absolutely loathsome scumbag, but in a way that makes you want to keep watching to see what he does next and what happens to him in the end. The film is emotional, intense, and exciting, with loads of adrenaline-pumping action scenes that all have a very real importance to the plot. That being said, many aspects of the film are far-fetched and a little bit ridiculous. I would not, however, disregard The Patriot only because of the controversies behind it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
alexandreaDec 1, 2021
Not an American, not a supporter of their system but I love this movie it is so awesome.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
beeanadouApr 4, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The stars are for the ink tea scene; besides, there are too much drama and I could hardly find the main theme. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MichaelB1May 3, 2020
It was such a good movie. Any and all true Americans should watch this. It shows the reasons Americans are so patriotic.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ThePixelCriticJul 20, 2020
Thrilling and dramatic, this film was an excitement to watch throughout. Gibson delivers yet another conflicted hero and portrays his struggle in an impressively tender but strong way. Isaacs also brings us a fantastic villain performanceThrilling and dramatic, this film was an excitement to watch throughout. Gibson delivers yet another conflicted hero and portrays his struggle in an impressively tender but strong way. Isaacs also brings us a fantastic villain performance once again. While a joy to watch throughout, the film foes occasionally drag and could have done with a few more scene cuts. The script can be a little lackluster and clunky in terms of dialogue at times, and the storyline is relative predictable. However, the action and drama is enough to overshadow these flaws. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews