United Artists | Release Date: July 27, 1955
8.3
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 135 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
114
Mixed:
12
Negative:
9
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
ekolite82Jul 10, 2012
One of cinema's miracles.
This movie put in me in a trance mid-way. It just sucks you in. The plot, directing, acting, casting, character development. I could go on and on. A most classic of classic movies. Might not be for every person
One of cinema's miracles.
This movie put in me in a trance mid-way. It just sucks you in. The plot, directing, acting, casting, character development. I could go on and on. A most classic of classic movies. Might not be for every person in the world, but, to me, this movie is just as important to cinema as The Wizard of Oz or 2001: A Space Odyssey. Right up there with them.
Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
10
ryancarroll88Aug 27, 2010
One of those movies that if I had seen as a child it would have terrified me to no end, and having seen it now, it just sits eerily in the back of my mind. It is truly a perfect thriller.
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
10
LordNasebySep 27, 2011
Pretty much as brilliant as movies get. Mitchum plays the serial killer preacher(his favorite role he said) with absolutely no morals(except get money). The scene on the porch at night is probably THE most brilliant movie scene in history.Pretty much as brilliant as movies get. Mitchum plays the serial killer preacher(his favorite role he said) with absolutely no morals(except get money). The scene on the porch at night is probably THE most brilliant movie scene in history. Good acting, good story, good movie. this is film making at it's very best. A suspenseful masterpiece. there are moments where i am actually worried that he would catch the kids. An excellent film. I particularly like how he would fool his victims and their friends. He has more or less memorized the basics of Christianity and he uses that for his own ends. He is so evil that you like him a lot. also I like how this was Laughton's first attempt at directing. It was his first time and he came up with this. the only other time that I have seen that is with Citizen Kane. A masterpiece that will never fade into the ages. It has and will continue to stand the test of time. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
10
cutnshootApr 9, 2011
It is too bad that Chas never got to direct again. This is one of America's great films.....told as a fairytale "once upon a time" style. I saw it on late night T.V. in the 60's and have seen it many time since, (big time screen and T.V.)It is too bad that Chas never got to direct again. This is one of America's great films.....told as a fairytale "once upon a time" style. I saw it on late night T.V. in the 60's and have seen it many time since, (big time screen and T.V.) and it never gets old. One of Mitchum's best and unusual turns. There is nothing mediocre about this film at all. Doesn't get any better than this! Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
1
UncleEarlDec 1, 2013
There has never been a more overrated movie to ever waste space in a film reel. I'm pretty sure everyone who gives it a good review is attesting it solely on mitchum's acting. He carries the movie alone and even then, it still sinks to rockThere has never been a more overrated movie to ever waste space in a film reel. I'm pretty sure everyone who gives it a good review is attesting it solely on mitchum's acting. He carries the movie alone and even then, it still sinks to rock bottom. Every single other actor is annoying, incompetent, or both. The plot rarely resolves anything it introduces in the story, like it's dragging its legs over jagged rocks and not trying to correct this. The conclusion came from absolutely nowhere. It's like everyone who was apart of this was hired to make a movie together and none of them had actually seen one before. This whole thing worked better as a novel where you don't have to accordion everything into a short 2 hour video and rely on actors to convey the work. I give it a 1 because mitchum wasn't God-awful in this. Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
2
DHEJan 8, 2011
Overall, this movie is a mess. It was badly acted, badly directed, and the plotting was plodding. Suspenseful? Give me a break. The child actors were especially annoying and the extras were just plain silly. I like classics, so it's notOverall, this movie is a mess. It was badly acted, badly directed, and the plotting was plodding. Suspenseful? Give me a break. The child actors were especially annoying and the extras were just plain silly. I like classics, so it's not just that it's an old movie. This could easily be the worst movie I ever watched all the way through. I would give it a zero except for some interesting camera work (for which Laughton may or may not deserve credit). Expand
1 of 10 users found this helpful19
All this user's reviews
0
carldamnitNov 18, 2018
I'm giving it a 0 because it had beautiful shots but all the conspiracy theories about why it wasn't a success in its day bother me, it's not a good movie.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
ovi_bzJan 9, 2011
Great movie. A lot of tension in it. Very good acting. The plot is a little bad regarding the money: it's the link that put all the movie in one piece but in the end it is not mentioned what happened with the money; did the police took theGreat movie. A lot of tension in it. Very good acting. The plot is a little bad regarding the money: it's the link that put all the movie in one piece but in the end it is not mentioned what happened with the money; did the police took the money or did John keep them? Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
LWFYMSep 27, 2013
Around the time this film came out, it did not have too many good reviews and did not do so well at the box office. It was not until later when people found the beauty in it, like finding a lost treasure. The film's plot seems simple enough,Around the time this film came out, it did not have too many good reviews and did not do so well at the box office. It was not until later when people found the beauty in it, like finding a lost treasure. The film's plot seems simple enough, but the way they do certain scenes and acting makes it creepy, Some people say the acting is not good at all, but that's for the better of the film. There are shadows and silhouettes that seems like it shouldn't be there, but that's to give the scene feeling and saying what's going on and a character's mood. There is no good way to describe this film other than a masterpiece in the thriller/noir genre. This is something you should see for yourself. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
daviddelnorte23Aug 22, 2017
Fui arrastrado a la filmoteca a ver esta película, no porque no me guste este tipo de películas, este cine tan clásico, sino porque esta es la típica película que tiene un toque "moñas" que hace que no sea mi tipo de cine. He de decir que noFui arrastrado a la filmoteca a ver esta película, no porque no me guste este tipo de películas, este cine tan clásico, sino porque esta es la típica película que tiene un toque "moñas" que hace que no sea mi tipo de cine. He de decir que no me aburrí en ningún momento del metraje y se me pasó bastante rápido, ¿Quiere decir esto que me gustó la película? La respuesta es, en general, no. Hay alguna parte como allá por el final que se vuelve bastante oscura por momentos y, después, una vez vista tiene cositas interesantes que cuenta. Mitchum tampoco me impresionó demasiado, y los niños se pueden ir... Pero en definitiva, estoy contento de haberla visto, siempre es bueno ver este cine, aunque... NO ES MI TIPO DE CINE. Pero es un clásio la película, hay que verla. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
mattkerr494Apr 8, 2018
Watched Feb 25, 2018

Matt Kerr’s review published on Letterboxd : One month into my personal film-watching challenge and this may be the best film that I have discovered this month. Robert Mitchum's performance as the shadowy, terrifying
Watched Feb 25, 2018

Matt Kerr’s review published on Letterboxd :
One month into my personal film-watching challenge and this may be the best film that I have discovered this month. Robert Mitchum's performance as the shadowy, terrifying Reverend Harry Powell is a reason to watch this movie alone. Love and hate tattooed to his knuckles, it is almost more terrifying to see him work his way into becoming a loved member of the community than it is to see his dark and murderous side unleashed. He haunts the screen with his presence, the shadows of his iconic hat and cheery sing-song lacing itself with the sinister undertone of his intent.
Fantastically scored and directed, and with one of the most terrifying and iconic villains of classic cinema, its no wonder that this film is rightfully revered as one of the all time greats, and with time may solidify itself as one of my all-time favourites.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
TimHMar 27, 2006
Awesome lone directorial effort by the great Laughton.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SpangleMar 22, 2017
They say that Satan knows the Bible just as well as God, for he uses its words to trick believers and people of the world into following a path of destruction. By knowing the words of the Bible, Lucifer can easily trick people into thinkingThey say that Satan knows the Bible just as well as God, for he uses its words to trick believers and people of the world into following a path of destruction. By knowing the words of the Bible, Lucifer can easily trick people into thinking his voice is that of God and that his words are godly ones. Unfortunately, far too many people fall for this trickery and are led astray. It is in this world that a film such as The Night of the Hunter is born. One where a Preacher is the antagonist and with good reason. He is a cruel and evil man whose only goal is to find money stashed away by a bank robber on death row. He uses his position as a Preacher to find favor with the townsfolk and the man's widow. All that is standing in his way is a couple of kids sworn to secrecy by their father.

Moving in the shadows to try and woo their mother and the townsfolk, Reverend Harry Powell (Robert Mitchum) is a truly brutal man. Arrested at the beginning of the film for being in possession of a stolen car, he is a wolf in sheep's clothing, sent to lead the righteous off the right path. He talks the talk and shows everybody he knows the Bible, but behind closed doors, he is ruthless. From murder to theft, this is not your father's Reverend. Instead, he is a manipulative and evil man that is deftly portrayed by Robert Mitchum. In my recent forays into older classics, I have become well acquainted with Mitchum and it is hard to see him playing so against type because, inherently, I want to root for him. Mitchum is a terrific actor and The Night of the Hunter really stands as a testament as to why that is the case. He chills the room by simply entering it and his dark figure seems to tower over all of those in his presence. He simply radiates evil and makes the perfect guy for this role as a false prophet. By casting Mitchum, it makes the audience immediately comfortable with Harry Powell, just as the townsfolk are considering his status as a preacher. However, we quickly see Mitchum's brilliance as he turns on a dime between God fearing preacher and the ruthlessly greedy soul he hides within.

As a tale of religion, the film is incredibly strong. On one hand, we have the wolf in sheep's clothing and on the other, we have Rachel Cooper (Lillian Gash). A woman of faith, she takes in both John (Billy Chapin) and Pearl (Sally Jane Bruce) - the children who Harry Powell tries to trick into giving him the location of their father's money - as well as other children. Though rejected by her own son, Rachel takes in children rejected by their parents or who are orphans and gives them a loving home. Reading often from the Bible and instilling a fear of God in her children, she stands as a beacon of light in the film and the true embodiment of faith. In the Bible it states, as Harry Powell quotes from Matthew 10:34, "Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword." Rachel, though bringing peace and happiness to this children, is defensive. When she catches wind of Harry's presence and finds out he is not John's father, she immediately defends her home and her children with a gun. Reasoning that this is a harsh world for small ones, she puts herself in harms way to defend the children in her charge against a brutal enemy. In its entirety, the Night of the Hunter is a deeply spiritual affair. It boils down to a man of evil fighting a woman of purity. He is the equivalent of a Holy War on Earth between the left hand of hate and the right hand of love and turns out exactly as illustrated by Harry Powell throughout the film with love conquering hatred.

Its tale of morality is not just limited to the main characters either, as even the Hangman (Paul Bryar) suffers greatly from his job. In hanging the children's father Ben Harper (Peter Graves), he once more finds himself grappling with the weight of his job and being unsure of its justification. A man who's job it is to kill people for the state may just be a job, but what is its impact on his salvation? Though working in the coal mines would likely kill him, he constantly expresses his regret over his job and wishes he had stuck with coal mining. It is a compelling debate and one that the film introduces with grace alongside its main story that raises a lot of questions. Is it better to die young and leave your family to fend for themselves or is it better to be the man in charge of hanging convicted criminals with blood on your hands? The answer is certainly not one that anybody would have a quality answer for.

As a film noir, director Charles Laughton heavily uses shadows, silhouettes, and lighting to create incredible cinematography. The highlight of the bunch being a shot of Harry Powell riding along the horizon on his horse. Silhouetted by the moon, the two young children can see him from a distance and can hear him singing. With the moment filled with tension due to its ominous presence, the film demonstrates how a simple
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
cameronmorewoodDec 20, 2012
Robert Mitchum gives a blistering and bone-chilling performance as a psychotic preacher, but the twist of the film as a whole, is that the movie isn't even about him. It's about two children, forever plagued by the sins of the father.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Compi24May 28, 2015
Charles Laughton employs some badass imagery in his only directorial effort "The Night Of The Hunter," a fitting love letter to German Expressionism and Aesop's fables on good and evil.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
gracjanskiAug 28, 2021
I didnt like this movie much: Many scenes are looking very cheap and the characters are clear. Sure, the preacher is intelligent and his two face way to achieve his goals is interesting, but the rest are simple characters.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
badwebdiverSep 11, 2014
This is a classic story practically everyone should get. It's one of those rare gems where the serious critics and most casual viewers can agree what a great story it is. It's thrilling, dramatic, well-paced, great characterization andThis is a classic story practically everyone should get. It's one of those rare gems where the serious critics and most casual viewers can agree what a great story it is. It's thrilling, dramatic, well-paced, great characterization and top-notch high-stakes tension, that is really good to watch.

This really is an all-round top story that is highly deserving of its acclaim. Total shame the director was never appreciated for his work here.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MattBrady99Sep 24, 2021
“It’s a hard world for little things.”

The story is about a religious fanatic marries a gullible widow whose young children are reluctant to tell him where their real daddy hid the $10,000, he’d stolen in a robbery. ‘The Night of the
“It’s a hard world for little things.”

The story is about a religious fanatic marries a gullible widow whose young children are reluctant to tell him where their real daddy hid the $10,000, he’d stolen in a robbery.

‘The Night of the Hunter’ is a movie that perfectly encapsulates the spirit of dread in every frame. I went into this knowing only the small plot description (the same one above the paragraph), and certain shots that I have seen around on social media through film related sites. What surprised me the most is how uncomfortable and eerie the movie is, which at first, I wasn’t sure if it was just me that was experiencing this. But when it finally clicked with me, then I knew I was in for something...interesting. The character Harry Powell, an evil charlatan preacher who takes advantage of anyone in his sight, played brilliantly by Robert Mitchum. Mitchum is terrifying and the whole “preacher” thing is just a character he puts on to trick people. He talks with a strong commanding southern voice that makes his preachy words easily take control of anyone in his presence. Powell would do anything to get his filthy hands onto some money, even going as far as marrying the children's mother, a naive widow (played by Shelley Winters) who was hoping for some happiness in her life with Powell, but she's only a part of his scheme of things. He is the big bad wolf with a hypnotizing singing voice. There’s no other way of describing him; he’s just an evil son of a **** I will never forget that terrifying Satanic roar from the monster called Harry Powell.

Even if people haven’t seen the movie, but some may recognise the famous tattoo of 'L-O-V-E' on his left hand & 'H-A-T-E' on his right hand, where he tells an animated story of love and hate through his hands. The most visual way of showing love and hate at war with each other and I can see where director Spike Lee got the idea for the Radio Raheem scene in ‘Do the Right Thing’.

A great supporting performance from Lillian Gish as Rachael Cooper, a religious woman, who unlike Harry Powell, practices what she preaches and has a hard as nails, no nonsense attitude, but also shows a loving and caring nature towards the already traumatise children. If you want a strong female character that shows you that they are strong rather than telling you, then this is it. If you come around looking for trouble, then you better kiss your ass goodbye and say hello to a barrel of a gun when it’s pointed at your face by Mrs. Cooper. The scenes between her and Powell were the most fascinating aspects of the movie. This is the first and sadly only feature film directed by Charles Laughton, which is a tragedy that he never made another movie after this, because the fact this is his first stab at a motion picture, as he was mostly a stage and screen actor, is beyond impressive.

The cinematography by Stanley Cortez is excellent and Gothic, as he gets to play around with the lighting and shadows, especially one shot of a wheel of a car at the bottom of the river with a dead body in the vehicle, with the blonde wavy hair dancing gently in the water, which made it look like a painting of a Gothic fairy-tale, while it also feels strangely peaceful, but very Brother’s Grimm. I would imagine this must have been shocking for people back in 1955, the same how it’s still shocking today. The River Boat scene is another sequence that’s just candy to the eyes. What the movie does so brilliantly is how it makes you feel the sense of danger, even from a distance. There were a couple of times when I said “wow” at certain details and how it was executed. Movie magic baby! Overall rating: A marvellous mix of beauty and horror. Go check it out! It’s great!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
VinceRocks123Apr 18, 2015
A modern biblical interpretation based on the tale of the Wolf, the sheep, and the good shepherd of the field, its probably the defining moment in cinema history, a gothic tale that will inspire directors from Scorsese to Lynch.

Robert
A modern biblical interpretation based on the tale of the Wolf, the sheep, and the good shepherd of the field, its probably the defining moment in cinema history, a gothic tale that will inspire directors from Scorsese to Lynch.

Robert Mitchum stars in one of his most of his most darkest and relentless performances, as Harry Powell, a sadistic misogynist serial killer posing as a traveling pastor who plots to uncover a private stash of money hidden by a recently executed convict, however no one knows where he buries it except the convict's children.

Soon the children's innocent childhoods are shattered when Powell murders their mother (Shelly Winters) causing them to flee into the woods in terror when they become they're next target for the money, their trail will come to an end when they meet Ms. Cooper (Lillian Gish), the keeper and finder of lost children who wields a gun as her weapon, and the children's only hope for retribution.

soon Good and Evil will settle out their differences in one final battle for the victory in the film's memorable climatic shootout.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
EpicLadySpongeApr 18, 2016
Can't tell whether I'll see the Night of the Hunter again or spread the word about it to everyone and then see it again. It's funny because all of the options have 'seeing it again' meaning that I love this movie so much and that means you too.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
BroyaxJul 20, 2018
Robert Mitchum sait parfois être un type épatant et inattendu : il se révèle en effet diaboliquement drôle dans son rôle de faux prédicateur et de véritable ordure, prêt à poursuivre des enfants innocents pour récupérer le magot... "love"Robert Mitchum sait parfois être un type épatant et inattendu : il se révèle en effet diaboliquement drôle dans son rôle de faux prédicateur et de véritable ordure, prêt à poursuivre des enfants innocents pour récupérer le magot... "love" sur une main, "hate" sur l'autre, ce gars a inventé le tout premier salopard bling-bling à dire vrai... Mais en vérité, le film en entier est une image d'Epinal à lui tout seul avec ces mômes qui peuvent tout "endurer", échapper au vilain et rester mignons tout plein chez Mamie Zinzin.

Mitchum est tellement sympathique qu'on lui donnerait le bon dieu sans confession et qu'on souhaiterait qu'il récupère le putain de fric très promptement, peu importe les moyens... et Dieu sait qu'il ne recule devant rien pour parvenir à ses fins le loustic... mais ne doit-on pas pardonner le pécheur mécréant, faux homme de Dieu à ses heures perdues ?... et euh... non, pas possible, ça ne passera pas. Surtout dans les années 30, ça ne rigolait pas. Avec la chaise électrique.

En tout cas, la psychologie des mômes est assez juste, surtout le plus malin qui ne se laisse jamais berner comme les adultes par le prêchi-prêcha du manipulateur... Puis, malgré sa durée somme toute très raisonnable (1h30 environ) qui en paraît finalement deux fois plus, le film s'enlise dans une niaiserie épouvantable teintée d'un optimisme béat à bailler aux corneilles. Quelques raccourcis de scénario sont aussi fort discutables, pour ne pas dire plus. Mais le pire reste cette lenteur, ce marasme qui s'empare soudainement du film pour ne plus le lâcher jusqu'à la fin...

Non pas qu'on ait pris au sérieux cette comédie à l'insu de son ignorance (loin s'en faut et bien au contraire) mais la drôlerie de Robert se retrouve hélas noyée dans le nunuche envahissant et décidément ravi de la crèche. Dommage donc... mais le film vaut encore le coup d'oeil en dépit de toutes ses maladresses réunies.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
_KeikoAug 1, 2017
good .
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JLuis_001Oct 18, 2017
I started to watch the new Netflix show Mindhunter on monday, I'm on episode 2 and I was talking with some guys on Facebook about serial killers and thrillers about them, I love the genre, it's one of my all-time favorites. Someone mentionedI started to watch the new Netflix show Mindhunter on monday, I'm on episode 2 and I was talking with some guys on Facebook about serial killers and thrillers about them, I love the genre, it's one of my all-time favorites. Someone mentioned this film and while I've heard about it before, I never actually got the chance to watch it.
It has nothing to do with the show but the film is the adaptation of a novel inspired on a real-life serial killer.

And how is the film? it's incredible, it's so good, the story, the way in which was filmed, the noir style, the narrative, the performaces, especially Robert Mitchum, who's at the same time charming and a bastard, this film is really, really good.
Also something interesting is that while the film it's actually really old somehow it looks older, that doesn't mean it looks bad at all is just that the style doesn't fit to the style of other films I've seen from the 50's.

The Night of the Hunter it's a bleak film, I've heard some consider it a horror film and maybe it fits the category in some way but it's more a dramatic and suspenful experiencie than a horror one. Anyway, I really loved it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
KenRNov 3, 2019
The strange fact-based story about “Reverend” Harry Powers, written by Davis Grubb, was turned into this equally strange film by first-time producer Paul Gregory. Gregory gave the directorial responsibilities to his friend Charles LaughtonThe strange fact-based story about “Reverend” Harry Powers, written by Davis Grubb, was turned into this equally strange film by first-time producer Paul Gregory. Gregory gave the directorial responsibilities to his friend Charles Laughton and the task of adapting the screenplay to Pulitzer Prize-winning author James Agee (AKF: “A Death in the Family “an
autobiographical novel). Laughton claimed part-writing credits but this has been heavily disputed since the finding of Agee’s original screenplay - showing the film to be shot as written by Agee. While Laughton has chosen to give his 1955 film (set in the 30s) the look of something that may have been produced in the silent era – he sometimes adds the odd unintentional laugh – these come via curious characters dotting the equally strange sets and situations. It was also evident Laughton had trouble with the kids. Perhaps the real power of this bizarre work should be credited to Director of Photography Stanley Cortez. Cortex has fused the film with striking visual atmosphere - adding an ethereal mood to the already dark story of a psychologically deranged ‘preacher’ serial killer. Whoever called the shots, between the two of them, they certainly left us with a haunting visual treat – who could ever forget the long blond hair flowing within the river currents, intertwined with the long wisps of river growth! The casting of stars from the silent era also gives the film an older look but there are undoubtedly many superb scenes to be enjoyed throughout this, at times, unsettling story. There’s an effective music score by Walter Schumann along with an odd casting choice of Mitchum as the hideous ‘reverend’ but at least the horror elements were subtle and not in-your-face like the current cheapies some have become used too.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AndrewHordMay 29, 2020
It is the example of utterly skillful play by Mitchell .Film is very great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
royalguy07Jan 21, 2023
Lost me a little in the final 20 minutes, but the lead performance was so well crafted and haunting and the overall structure was perfect.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews