Acteurs Auteurs Associés (AAA) | Release Date: September 24, 1986
7.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 21 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
17
Mixed:
4
Negative:
0
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
9
sulpherJan 2, 2021
The "critics" score on this movie are laughable. The critics were simply too shallow and dumb to appreciate the movie for what it is. As soon as it isn't the average mindless Hollywood flick, they give it bad reviews.
Fact is, that this movie
The "critics" score on this movie are laughable. The critics were simply too shallow and dumb to appreciate the movie for what it is. As soon as it isn't the average mindless Hollywood flick, they give it bad reviews.
Fact is, that this movie is a pretty good "detective" story set in a very convincing, gloomy Italian monestary in the dark ages. The set and the film making of The Name Of The Rose is still stunning more than 30 years later. There are only some minor things that could have been improved - like the ending.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
gracjanskiNov 11, 2021
The setting of the movie is very interesting, something you rarely see. The dialogues and story are also interesting. The actors are great and famous.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Kai82Feb 22, 2021
A murder mystery set in a medieval abbey with a great cast and of a lot of religious and philosophical motives. It is based on the book of the same name by Umberto Eco and it is his most known work. Because Umberto Eco is a medievalist,A murder mystery set in a medieval abbey with a great cast and of a lot of religious and philosophical motives. It is based on the book of the same name by Umberto Eco and it is his most known work. Because Umberto Eco is a medievalist, philosopher and great novelist it is a great book but definitely not for everyone. Remark: It is a good movie but not an ideal adaptation as it would be hardly possible to fit in all the stuff of the book (Also the book is darker and has a different ending). The story starts when Franciscan friar William of Baskerville travels to an abbey in norther Italy with his pupil the novice Adso of Melk. There the Franciscans want to debate with papal emissaries about the poverty of Christ. This means basically if the church should be allowed to amass money and possessions (A lost cause as being pope or church dignitary is a lucrative job that no one wants to give up). Secondary the abbey is famous for its library including translating and copying books. William who is famous for his deductive skills figures out when they arrive that a monk has died shortly before his arrival and is ask by the abbot to solve this as the circumstances are puzzling. With this set up the story starts. I like it really well. It is full of ideologies or better said interpretations of believes, philosophical problems, clashing characters and has good twists. The medieval setting works great and I never doubted the atmosphere nor the setting. It feels organically crafted and the strong cast completes this movie. Lets directly continue with the cast. Sean Connery as William of Baskerville gives a great performance. He has deductive skills close to the level of Sherlock Holmes but is far more adept at social interactions (Some will say less would be hard to archive. Just ask Dr. Watson about this;-). Christian Slater plays Adso of Melk the novice and pupil of William. He is the Doctor Watson to his Sherlock Holmes but is different too. He is young and a bit naive but not stupid or lets say he has not the life experience. Another great performance by this great actor. Then there is Murray Abraham as Bernardo Gui. He is an excellent adversary or rival for William. A magnificent performance as he creates a lot of emotion in the viewer. From the rest of the cast I will praise Michael Londsdale as the Abbot (Forgot if he was even named in the movie), Feodor Chaliapin jr and Ron Pearlman (yes that one) as Salvatore. A strong cast with a lot of good actors. I must praise the sets too as everything looks authentic. Some parts were filmed in Germany in the Ebersbach Abbey, some in castle Molin de Aragon but the most impressing was a specially created set build in Prima Porta which was back then one of the biggest sets in movie history. They did a lot to archive the style and visuals and I praise them here for this. I think I continue with my final statement. Overall this is an excellent movie with lots of interesting themes. The cast fully delivers and it was enjoyable. I must also admit that it is not for everyone as it could be to complex or confusing. This makes a recommendation nearly impossible as you could fully agree or ask yourself if we have even seen the same movie. Lets say the murder mystery at least should be enjoyable for nearly everyone and the philosophical and religious themes at least for some. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
alejandro970Nov 7, 2020
Of intrigue, about a mysterious sacrilegious crime that occurred in an isolated abbey. The atmosphere provokes both chills and disgust; one of its weak points is the slow development of the plot. To see for Sean Connery in his honorableOf intrigue, about a mysterious sacrilegious crime that occurred in an isolated abbey. The atmosphere provokes both chills and disgust; one of its weak points is the slow development of the plot. To see for Sean Connery in his honorable memory. Long life. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Gamzguy17Aug 21, 2021
While Connery and Slater provide our eyes (and brains) to look into a world where power corrupts and mankind is in a state of physical and mental reduction, the film drags at a snail's pace with a climax that doesn't quite reach a satisfyingWhile Connery and Slater provide our eyes (and brains) to look into a world where power corrupts and mankind is in a state of physical and mental reduction, the film drags at a snail's pace with a climax that doesn't quite reach a satisfying payoff. Otherwise, the film is well shot and it does create an atmosphere that is discomforting while emphasizing the harshest realities of the Middle Ages. Worthy enough to see once. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
jrmartinezMI8Feb 9, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A finales de noviembre de 1327, fray Guillermo de Baskerville un monje franciscano y antiguo inquisidor y su discípulo, el joven novicio Adso de Melk, acuden a una pequeña abadía benedictina del norte de Italia. Su viaje responde a un claro objetivo: resolver la muerte de un miniaturista. Mientras permanecen en la abadía, otros monjes comienzan a desaparecer misteriosamente y, cuando poco después son encontrados muertos, el caso se complica. Mientras Guillermo investiga la biblioteca, Adso tiene otras preocupaciones cuando conoce a una joven que no tarda en seducirlo. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews