Universal Pictures | Release Date: August 1, 2008
3.8
USER SCORE
Generally unfavorable reviews based on 320 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
71
Mixed:
87
Negative:
162
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
ColinCJan 19, 2009
My least favorite of the three. A lot of spectacle, but the story and characters fall flat. It's the kind of movie that reminds you that no amount of spectacle can replace having a solid story with characters you actually care about. Is My least favorite of the three. A lot of spectacle, but the story and characters fall flat. It's the kind of movie that reminds you that no amount of spectacle can replace having a solid story with characters you actually care about. Is it too much to ask for both, Hollywood? Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
4
kevinmJan 29, 2009
This latest entry in the series kind of became a parody of itself, which is too bad because I really love the first two.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
4
JurajAug 28, 2008
The only thing good about the film are the special effects. However, without anything to support the FX, the movie blows. The humor (especially Jonathan's) is so forced at times. Oh, and the emperor - he was invincible when he was The only thing good about the film are the special effects. However, without anything to support the FX, the movie blows. The humor (especially Jonathan's) is so forced at times. Oh, and the emperor - he was invincible when he was awaken; then he drank from the well of invincible water, and then he finally became invincible once more. A few seconds later, the good guys kill him. Darn. Oh, and the actress looked nice in her dresses. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
4
TheQuietGamerFeb 15, 2011
This movie is a huge let down, even if your a fan of the series like I am you still wont like this, even the second one was better than this, don't watch this movie.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
KurisuD.Aug 9, 2008
Not a true Mummy movie, but as a general action-adventure flick I don't really have any complaints. Just go in with some popcorn; normal expectations; don't try and over analyze the movie; and you should be fine.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
6
Sosmooth1982Jan 5, 2023
My least favorite out of the series. It's a decent movie. For some reason though the kid just bothered me throughout the movie. If it wasn't for him though would have been a good movie.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
concretetesterAug 3, 2008
The story was good. The actors never jelled and the frantic action appeared pedestrian. Jet Li was subdued. Should have been a much better movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
GeorgeMAug 5, 2008
This is about the most "meh" of a movie ive seen ALL SUMMER. The first Mummy film became an instant classic in my book.....its simply simply a classic "popcorn movie" with a certain charm that dosen't tarnish over the years (ive seen This is about the most "meh" of a movie ive seen ALL SUMMER. The first Mummy film became an instant classic in my book.....its simply simply a classic "popcorn movie" with a certain charm that dosen't tarnish over the years (ive seen the movie at least 100 times). The second Mummy film choked on its own extravagance trying to top the first film by adding 100s more effects shots that held the film back more than it helped.....in other words, the second Mummy movie pales in comparison to the first. This 3rd offerring......i just couldnt think of this as a film in the "The Mummy" franchise, it just didn't feel right. The action sequences are interesting.....but they are shot so quickly and edited so poorly its simply no fun to watch. The Yetis were.....neat.....and the whole field goal thing didn't bother nearly as much as the WHOLE FILM being a clutterred mess. Rick and Eveys characters seemed to be in the right place (Maria Bello did a.....decent job) but Ricks son Alex came off as annoying and his Chinese girlfriend didn't do so well either. Jonathon (John Hannah) gets NOTHING to do in this movie but sit their and look stupid.....and freak out when say.....an avalanche happens, and thats a shame.....i really enjoyed his character in the previous films, then again his character was written SO MUCH better in those films, here he is completely wasted. Its not a TOTAL loss.....but so close to it you may not even care, see with caution......either youll "kinda like it" or "hate it" completely. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JayH.Dec 12, 2008
Granted it is not a great movie, but it is well produced with good special effects. It does entertain but it also tends to drag a bit too much and seemed longer than its hour and 52 minute length.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
RulerInc.Aug 2, 2008
If the beginning of this movie wasn't so over done and trying to look so good it would have made the movie a TON better. For the fighting scenes in the movie they were well done and so were the very popular camera angles. The story line If the beginning of this movie wasn't so over done and trying to look so good it would have made the movie a TON better. For the fighting scenes in the movie they were well done and so were the very popular camera angles. The story line was interesting it could have had so much life and excitement to it. But I'm afraid that the beginning puts you in a state of mind that they are trying to over due it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
HastyManicAug 2, 2008
This falls neatly under the category of 'big loud dumb fun.' While it is completely unmemorable, the film, in spite of itself, has a mild charm about it and some amusing dialogue and action to offset the general mediocrity of the This falls neatly under the category of 'big loud dumb fun.' While it is completely unmemorable, the film, in spite of itself, has a mild charm about it and some amusing dialogue and action to offset the general mediocrity of the proceedings. I must say, however, that Jet Li's villian has to be one of the most impotent of bad dudes in a big commercial film in as long as I can remember. OK entertainment and a decent distraction. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
MikeM.Aug 3, 2008
Replacing Rachael Weisz with Maria Bello really compromises the chemistry of this franchise. Half of the fun of the first two movies was watching the interplay of Brendan Fraser's character with Ms Weisz; Ms Bello and him have about as Replacing Rachael Weisz with Maria Bello really compromises the chemistry of this franchise. Half of the fun of the first two movies was watching the interplay of Brendan Fraser's character with Ms Weisz; Ms Bello and him have about as much chemistry as two dead fish. Once the movie gets going, about a third in, it starts to become enjoyable, as long as Ms. Bello isn't a primary focus. Fun, but could have been so much better. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JohnJul 31, 2008
Surprisingly not as bad as what the critics would make you believe. Go in with low expectations and you might have a little fun with it. The whole franchise is mindless popcorn trite so keep that in mind before you go.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
[Anonymous]Aug 15, 2008
I'll admit it. I went into the theatre not expecting much from this film, and even then I was disappointed. As my mother and I left the theatre we didn't even talk about it. It just didn't have the same fun feeling that its I'll admit it. I went into the theatre not expecting much from this film, and even then I was disappointed. As my mother and I left the theatre we didn't even talk about it. It just didn't have the same fun feeling that its prequels had. I wanted to like it, I tried to like it, but I couldn't. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
julian_zizzleAug 3, 2011
A nice sequel for the thrilling The Mummy Series. But thats all. Thats why i watched this movie. It was all good in the first 2 movies when they were after Imhotep in Egypt. But China has nothing to do about it. I wish they were still in Egypt. -_-
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Potter17Oct 9, 2011
Sometimes when a franchise is a major hit in the box-office the same franchise tends to become worse or worse. That was what happened with "The Mummy". After two delightful films, the third entry of the series was a complete flop.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
ZilcellMay 29, 2012
Sloppy it its construction, the only major things going for it are the humor and action. The story is far too unorganized.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
TyranianApr 12, 2019
Very poor third film, big mistake not having Weisz and their son is very poorly realised. Dumb.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
RikiegeJan 31, 2013
The previous two parts were entertaining, this is not so.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
JP32Jun 23, 2018
Mummy 3 lacks the energy, scale, and humor of The Mummy and The Mummy Returns, not to mention their director and star. With Rachel Weisz gone and Stephen Sommers relegated to producer, Tomb of the Dragon Emperor is clearly a lesser caliberMummy 3 lacks the energy, scale, and humor of The Mummy and The Mummy Returns, not to mention their director and star. With Rachel Weisz gone and Stephen Sommers relegated to producer, Tomb of the Dragon Emperor is clearly a lesser caliber popcorn blockbuster. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
clem666Aug 3, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The film takes the audience on a wild and action-packed ride with its efficient introduction that sets the tone for a classic adventure. However, the film quickly falters with its terrible and sometimes barely okay CGI, leaving viewers questioning the production's attention to detail.

One of the film's biggest drawbacks is its reliance on numerous deus ex machina moments and an abundance of superpowers that undermine the sense of realism and engagement. The overpowered villains are ultimately defeated by a team of nobodies, diluting any genuine sense of peril or suspense.

The film's attempts to deepen the relationship between father and son seem hopeless, and while it adds some emotional moments, it fails to truly resonate. Unfortunately, the son's character proves to be particularly annoying, and the romance he is involved in feels forced and lacks genuine chemistry.

Moreover, the soldiers appear flimsy, as they seem to be made of glass, reducing their impact in pivotal scenes. However, despite these evident flaws, 'The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor' maintains an unabashed and lighthearted approach, making it entertaining for those seeking an uninhibited cinematic experience.

In conclusion, the movie presents itself as a mixed bag of enjoyment. While the CGI, character development, and plot fall short of expectations, the movie's refusal to take itself seriously and its uninhibited approach offer an entertaining experience for audiences willing to overlook its shortcomings.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
DiptanshuApr 13, 2020
ah **** here we go again!literally uneccesarry even though action was good and great chasing sequence at start good humour!one time watch
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews