The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

9

MovieGuysFeb 2, 2014

Still fresh, The Lord of the Rings series' second installment is almost as good as the first, with slight imperfections that are easily overlooked. Overall, the movie is still a great epic.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

cag11Nov 29, 2013

This movie is a perfect sequel to Fellowship of the Ring. It doesn't have the absolute perfect thing, but it's almost flawless. The acting is overall just as good as the first one,, with a bit better graphics.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

joao1198pedroOct 27, 2013

between the three movies of the series this is the worst(the less great),but still is another epical movie that deserves great scores,this is just the middle of the story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SubaqueousDreamSep 5, 2022

Out of the three in the trilogy, the Two Towers had the best mix of quiet and loud moments. Endlessly rewatchable

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DrewtheDude85May 28, 2015

While it's probably my least favorite film in The Lord the Rings trilogy (even though all three TLOTR films are almost equally amazing), The Two Tower is still another masterpiece that should not be overlooked. If you felt that The FellowshipWhile it's probably my least favorite film in The Lord the Rings trilogy (even though all three TLOTR films are almost equally amazing), The Two Tower is still another masterpiece that should not be overlooked. If you felt that The Fellowship of the Ring was rather light on action, then SEE THIS MOVIE because it has action and excitement in it that definitely feels like an improvement over it's predecessor. This film also introduces Golem (even though he did have a few minor appearances in TFOTR) and Andy Serkis did a fantastic job portraying this corrupted and messed up character. This film does just about everything right, you will be captivated the whole way through despite the film being around 3 hours long. The only thing that makes this film probably the one I love the least of the three (even though I still adore this film) is the fact that it still feels like a middle chapter making you feel a little annoyed that not all will end here. Luckily, we have The Return of the King to fix that all up. See TTT, it's a fantastic action-adventure fantasy film that you don't want to miss.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AaronWasserman2May 5, 2014

A sequel on par with its predacessor. Still and insanely fun movie, on the long side, yes, but like the first film it never lets you get bored and it introduces you to one of the best villains....Gollum

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SkyrimGuy935Jan 26, 2015

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers continues the trilogy with more fleshed out characters, the same level of emotional depth as the first, masterful, captivating storytelling, and truly epic battle sequences. I feel compelled to point outThe Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers continues the trilogy with more fleshed out characters, the same level of emotional depth as the first, masterful, captivating storytelling, and truly epic battle sequences. I feel compelled to point out the Battle of Helm's Deep, as it particularly stood out. I would even put this a slight, although minuscule notch above The Fellowship of the Ring, which is already an incredible film. However, the run time is just one measly minute shy of three hours, which may put off some viewers. If you thought Fellowship was too long, you'll likely feel the same way about this one. Needless to say though, it is still an incredible fantasy film.

Overall - 9.7/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

johnbobs1Jan 20, 2015

The second part of Peter Jackson's Rings trilogy is for me, possibly the best film of the series.
Like the others, it is truly epic in its design and in bringing Tolkien's fantastic legend to life, but this film contains a kind ofThe second part of Peter Jackson's Rings trilogy is for me, possibly the best film of the series.
Like the others, it is truly epic in its design and in bringing Tolkien's fantastic legend to life, but this film contains a kind of atmospheric tension (best seen In Sam and Frodo's story) and gritty brutality (in the battle at Helm's Deep) that the other films did not quite possess in such measure.
As in the other films, the settings and scenery of the film are outstanding: from the eerie bleakness of the dead marshes to the wild and windswept hills of the plains of Rohan, this is beautifully filmed stuff.
Much of the acting is also of a very high standard. Ian Mckellen and Christopher Lee fit their roles as wise and mighty wizard (Gandalf) vs evil and corrupted wizard (Saruman) perfectly and Elijah Wood (Frodo) and Sean Astin (Sam) really take their performances to even higher standards in this installment.
I apologise if the following actors escape me here (!) - there are also several fine additions to the cast in this movie and the characters of Theoden, Eowyn and Grima Wormtongue also shine. But perhaps the finest performance comes from Andy Serkis, who plays Gollum. Gollum is of course 100% computer animated, but such is the strength of Serkis' performance and the realism of the animation, that this is definitely the performance of the film.
The battle of Helms Deep is also truly memorable, and the finest battle in the trilogy of films. We see lots of bloody fighting, hear swords clanging, arrows twanging from bows, see ladders assailing the fortress wall and even a huge explosion shake the foundations of the wall apart. Brilliantly done. The only that perhaps betters it are the prodeeding scenes - Saruman addressing his huge army at Isengard, the bleakness of the mood inside Helms Deep, the arrival of the elves and finally the tense wait just before the start of the battle, when we see and hear the huge army of the enemy slowly making it's way towards the gates under darkened skies.
It may be a superb film, but it is not totally without fault. Some characters will tend to irritate Tolkien enthuiasts, particularly Gimli and Legolas, who seem to have been given more trivial roles in this film, especially in the battle scenes. A large chunk of the plot has also changed, or at least been moved in this film as well, and some viewers may find themselves that Sam and Frodo do not get to face Shelob until the final film of the series, rather than in the Two Towers (as they did in the book). But the gripes do not amount to nearly enough to discredit what is an immense achievement and one of the finest fantasy films made in recent years.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Kai82Jul 23, 2021

The final movie of the trilogy. I repeat myself: It is a good adaptation and really good movie. The books are full to the brim with stories, characters, lore and world building. It is a challenge to adapt these to the screen and I would haveThe final movie of the trilogy. I repeat myself: It is a good adaptation and really good movie. The books are full to the brim with stories, characters, lore and world building. It is a challenge to adapt these to the screen and I would have a hard time to do it. To clarify this: Not everything from a book can be adapted to a different medium and even with 3 long movies they have to make sacrifices. However this movie feels like they changed more from the source material than for the other two. What I deeply miss is a chapter near the end from “The Return of the King”. There you can see how the 4 Hobbits have grown and the conclusion to Saruman and Wormtogue’s story (Was added in the extended edition). Also the occurring problem between Sam and Frodo is absolute unbelievable for the readers of the book (But to be fair it is well done and enhances the movies story). Other than that I mind that they weakened Merry and Theoden’s relationship, changed Eowyn’s and Faramir’s story and that the goodbyes and characters ever afters are not shown or changed. There are other changes and these might be harsher for others or hardcore fans. There are also some good additions: There are more character interactions between Sam, Frodo and Gollum, Faramir’s attack with his men and the additions to Denethor to name a few. Story: This is the endgame. All characters are in a dire battle against Sauron’s forces. Sam and Frodo try to sneak further into Mordor and stop Saruon forever. Aragon, Legolas and Gimli are rallying all help they can get for Gondor while Merry and Pippin fought their own battles. Gandalf is trying to keep everything together as Gondor’s might will be put to a test and Rohan tries to get ass many warriors together to help them in its weakened state. Again the story works well. It is immersive, enjoyable and engaging. I repeat that they did not include a chapter that that shows the Hobbits way home and last struggle. It shows how much the 4 Hobbits had grown and even Gandalf said that they have become such great people that he does not need to worry about them or they even need him to solve issues. It the end I say it is good enough to get praised by me. Cast / Characters: I already praised the whole cast from the previous movies and repeat that nearly everyone became my definite interpretation. They nailed their roles and gave an awesome performance. For the new characters I fully praise John Noble as Denethor. An incredible performance. I think Lawrence Makoare as Witch King also deserves praise. With all these we got an awesome cast that fully delivers a great performance. Presentation: Also again New Zealand is such a beautiful location. It is no wonder that the movies raise the tourism by far. Atop on that all special effects look convincing and the sets and practical effects enhance the atmosphere too. I did not find a misstep here in this regard. Like for all previous movies we got an awesome soundtrack. Overall this is a satisfying conclusion for an epic trilogy. Definitely a must see for movie fans. A worthy adaptation to a beloved book / books.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

launchpad2132Jan 6, 2015

Undoubtedly the worst of the Lord of the RIngs movies. Certainly for me at least. And it still warrants a 10. Just increadible how Peter Jackson is able to take source materiel that is already amazing and turn it into something even better.Undoubtedly the worst of the Lord of the RIngs movies. Certainly for me at least. And it still warrants a 10. Just increadible how Peter Jackson is able to take source materiel that is already amazing and turn it into something even better. The plot is the thinnest in this one but the action more than makes up for it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SythusRATINGSOct 18, 2014

In the second chapter in J.R.R Tolkien's epic trilogy, the Fellowship faces unimaginable armies and deception while also witnessing ancient wonders and the untapped strength of their people.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JohnMasterLJul 20, 2015

The two towers conserva los mismos aspectos mágicos y épicos de su antecesora, pero es mas emocionante y grande a la vez. Mas personajes, mas historias, mas situaciones, cada una de ellas con un estilo distinto, manejado de una maneraThe two towers conserva los mismos aspectos mágicos y épicos de su antecesora, pero es mas emocionante y grande a la vez. Mas personajes, mas historias, mas situaciones, cada una de ellas con un estilo distinto, manejado de una manera increíble. Peter Jackson juega muy bien con las historias y crea una trama perfectamente entendible que conecta a un punto: El retorno del rey. Una excelente secuela que nos prepara para el gran final.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SuperkidNov 9, 2014

This movie is awesome. Though I admit there is walking which every body seems to hate in the first half with small battles all off a sudden BOOM! there is like a mini war. then it goes to the next battle which is enormous with epic deaths andThis movie is awesome. Though I admit there is walking which every body seems to hate in the first half with small battles all off a sudden BOOM! there is like a mini war. then it goes to the next battle which is enormous with epic deaths and hand-to-hand combat that is magnificent but the walking I admit could've been more interesting but it's still a really good movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

thomasljoguesNov 13, 2014

A slight hair below Fellowship's quality, Two Towers is still a masterpiece. Although it does seem to slow down at times and differ from the source material in an occasional cliché way, it has the big plus of adding a theme of end and despair.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

starwooowMar 8, 2015

long? YES . Boring? ABSOLUTELY NO. this movie are long ( all three) because there is about character development. every LOTR films has a new character especially The Two Towers. your will saying awesome when you see the battle of Helm's Deep.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

moviemaniaMar 10, 2015

This movie is so awesometacular. The battle are bigger, breathaking and thrilling. I think no word to describe this movie just my experience. Must see!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

homer4presidentMar 11, 2015

I wish every movie were like this. Epic storytelling operating on the level of mythology with the spectacle and tone of a Wagnerian opera. If only I could erase my memory of these films and watch them for the first time with every viewing, II wish every movie were like this. Epic storytelling operating on the level of mythology with the spectacle and tone of a Wagnerian opera. If only I could erase my memory of these films and watch them for the first time with every viewing, I would probably stop watching all other movies!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

VinceRocks123Jun 25, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. actually a lot better than the first installment the epic journey to destroy the One Ring continues to grow darker in this powerful gritty yet perfect continuation to the first installment of Peter Jackson's desperately faithful adaption to J.R. Tolkien's masterpiece.

Middle-Earth has been plagued by the rising threats of Orcs, the savage creatures created by the evil lord Sauron in a attempt to take back the One Ring. At the sometime the malign powers of the ring struck a small victory against its captors, the Fellowship of the Ring, Boromir is killed and Gandalf having fallen to an uncertain fate during the battle in the Mines of Moria.

Frodo (Elijah Wood) now left to face the burden of the evil ring's power and his injuries, he is still determined to fulfill his destiny to destroy it, alone. left with his faithful companion the hobbit Samwise and the unlikely trust of the creature Gollum (in a amazing screen captured performance by Andy Serkis) whose life and personality has been corrupted by the rings malign influence, he reluctantly helps guide the two hobbits through the Dark Forest towards the orc kingdom of Mordor where the mountain of Doom lies.

Meanwhile in a desperate urge for a distraction to give Frodo more time, Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen) and the surviving fellowship, Legolas and Gimli head for the kingdom of Rohan to get its armies to rise up against the tyranny of the White Wizard Saruman (Sir Christopher Lee in his most finest performance), who has sworn the kingdom of Isengard an allegiance with Mordor.

Even though its not as great as the other two, I think it was great in moral and lmmoral standards, as it demonstrates half of the difficulties of resisting the terror of the One Rings malign influence, and a worthwhile continuation of Tolkien's masterful novel, though the film lacks some faithfulness to the books, I must say I loved it very much, and thus my three part review of the Lord of the Rings soon closes in on the big one.....

also the visual effects here starts to get as great as the first one did! with bigger and more badass action with armies of magical creatures clashing with one another!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

EdwardGregoryApr 19, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Peter Jackson has always maintained that The Two Towers is "the second act" of his epic undertaking, and perhaps the true greatness of the middle chapter will only be clear when viewed in context. As a stand-alone film, however, The Two Towers is not quite as good as Fellowship. (Nor, indeed, does it extend the universe or deepen the relationships in the manner of The Empire Strikes Back.) That it still merits the full five stars is merely an indication of how high the benchmark has been set.

Picking up pretty much where Fellowship left off, this is a considerably darker film, with Frodo (Wood) falling further under the influence of the Ring (giving rise to some seriously spooky hallucinations), while Saruman (Christopher Lee) wreaks even more havoc. There's also the first appearance of Saruman's spy, the sinister Wormtongue (Brad Dourif), and the complex Gollum, a brilliant combination of computer trickery and raspy vocals from Andy Serkis (the campaign for a Best Supporting Actor Oscar starts here).

Other newcomers include Faramir (David Wenham), the understandably miffed brother of the recently deceased Boromir, and Éowyn (Miranda Otto), who spends much of her time casting winsome glances in the general direction of Aragorn (Mortensen). Eventually the plot complexities become more coherent, setting the action up for the forthcoming finale, The Return Of The King.

As we've come to expect, this is spectacular stuff - from an opening which sees Frodo troubled by dreams about the demise of Gandalf, through to the climactic Battle Of Helm's Deep, which is nothing short of breathtaking. But Jackson cleverly tempers the louder, brasher sequences with some heartstring-tugging moments - peasants despondent as they are forced to abandon their villages, Aragorn and Arwen's troubled relationship, and, of course, the return of Gandalf (Sir Ian McKellen, superb as ever), one of the film's most powerful, memorable images that may well leave Ring devotees a little misty-eyed.

However, those who still believe that the trilogy is beyond criticism may find their views challenged by The Two Towers. It's just as long as the first film, but gets the heroes no closer to a final victory. And, where the first movie developed its emotional tone from the brightness of The Shire to a darker climax, the sequel is more of a one-note affair, shadowy in both look and content.

This is particularly true of the Ringbearer's quest, which adds the not-insignifcant Gollum to the party, but suffers more than the other story strands from the cross-cutting and finishes with a nearly identical pep talk from Sam to the tearful speech that climaxed Fellowship. Of course, given the nature of the material, and Jackson's desire to be faithful, this is all understandable. And by the time we all end up under siege at Helm's Deep, it's unlikely anyone will give a toss about narrative arcs: like Gollum, this is simply gob-smacking, mind-blowing, never-seen-before stuff.

It may lack the first-view-thrill and natural dramatic shape of Fellowship, but this is both funnier and darker than the first film, and certainly more action-packed. An essential component of what is now destined to be among the best film franchises of all time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

EddyGregsApr 19, 2015

The saga continues: Hobbits Frodo and Sam press on to Mordor in the company of the mysterious Gollum. Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli travel to the troubled Rohan, while Merry and Pippin discover a new ally in the shape of Treebeard theThe saga continues: Hobbits Frodo and Sam press on to Mordor in the company of the mysterious Gollum. Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli travel to the troubled Rohan, while Merry and Pippin discover a new ally in the shape of Treebeard the tree-shepherd.

Peter Jackson has always maintained that The Two Towers is "the second act" of his epic undertaking, and perhaps the true greatness of the middle chapter will only be clear when viewed in context. As a stand-alone film, however, The Two Towers is not quite as good as Fellowship. (Nor, indeed, does it extend the universe or deepen the relationships in the manner of The Empire Strikes Back.)

It may lack the first-view-thrill and natural dramatic shape of Fellowship, but this is both funnier and darker than the first film, and certainly more action-packed. An essential component of what is now destined to be among the best film franchises of all time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MovieManiac83Apr 23, 2015

Of the three pieces of the Middle Earth puzzle, The Two Towers is the one with the biggest handicap. It is afflicted with the "middle chapter syndrome" - an inherent obstacle for the second episode of any trilogy. The Two Towers has no realOf the three pieces of the Middle Earth puzzle, The Two Towers is the one with the biggest handicap. It is afflicted with the "middle chapter syndrome" - an inherent obstacle for the second episode of any trilogy. The Two Towers has no real beginning or end. (This is as true of the book as it is of the movie.) It takes situations and characters introduced in The Fellowship of the Ring and prepares them for The Return of the King. The trick is to immerse audiences "in the moment" and keep them from looking ahead - a daunting task, to be sure, but one that Jackson is up to.

In nearly every way that counts, The Two Towers is The Fellowship of the Ring's equal. In terms of tone, pacing, character development, plot advancement, and visual splendor, there is no drop-off. More importantly, the continuity is seamless (one advantage of filming the trilogy as a single project), allowing a viewer familiar with the first movie to flow effortlessly into the second. Of course, therein lies a drawback, as well. The Two Towers cannot stand on its own. Familiarity with The Fellowship of the Ring is not just advisable, it is mandatory. Anyone attempting to watch The Two Towers without having seen (or read) the first installment is headed for confusion and disillusionment.

Stodgy Tolkien purists who disliked some of the changes Jackson made to The Fellowship of the Ring may be outraged by what he and his screenwriters have done here. The Two Towers differs much more from its written inspiration than the first movie. Yet, in tone and spirit, this remains very much Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings, although altered in a manner that makes it more of a living, breathing cinematic endeavor rather than a point-by-point regurgitation (like the Harry Potter films). The movie version of The Two Towers also ends before the book does. Certain events that occur late in the novel will be incorporated into the beginning of the film adaptation of The Return of the King.

The stunning climax of The Two Towers is the battle of Helm's Deep - a 30-minute spectacle that features the siege of a seemingly impregnable stone fortress by an army of 10,000 creatures of Sauruman (Christopher Lee). Inside that fortress is a small force of several hundred humans and elves, led by Aragorn, Theoden, Legolas, and Gimli. Although the attack occupies only a dozen pages of Tolkien's novel, Jackson has transformed it into the centerpiece of the film - an amazing, heart-stopping battle against impossible odds. And, while a huge special effects contribution is needed to make the battle such an awesome feast for the eyes, Jackson never lets the CGI work overwhelm the human element of what's going on, and there are plenty of scenes in which costumes, set design, and makeup enflame our imaginations, not computer work.

Jackson has added dashes of mirth and romance to the film - two elements in short supply in the novel. Most of the humor, which is decidedly low-key, involves Gimli, who occasionally seems to be around as much for comic relief as anything else. For example, in the middle of the battle of Helm's Deep, he is infuriated that his number of kills can't keep pace with Legolas'. On the romantic front, Aragorn, who is promised to the elven princess Arwen (Liv Tyler), finds himself the object of attention for Theoden's niece, Eowyn (Miranda Otto). This sets up a triangle.

The Two Towers starts out a little slowly, but the rousing second half, which gathers momentum like a boulder racing downhill, will leave audiences craving more when the end credits roll. Combined, The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers represent one of the most engrossing and engaging six-hour segments of cinema I have ever enjoyed. If the final third of the puzzle is the equal of the first two, this will go down as one of the crowning achievements of cinema. Like its predecessor, The Two Towers is a great motion picture, and not to be missed by anyone who appreciates fantasy adventure.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

CinemaBlendMay 6, 2015

If there is a primary quality needed to bring J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings to the screen, it is vision - an attribute possessed in abundance by director Peter Jackson. In more than 100 years of motion pictures, few cinematicIf there is a primary quality needed to bring J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings to the screen, it is vision - an attribute possessed in abundance by director Peter Jackson. In more than 100 years of motion pictures, few cinematic campaigns of this magnitude have been mounted. Not only has Jackson faced the daunting task of creating and populating an entirely new world based on Tolkien's blueprint, but he has contended with the real-word rigors of a two-year shooting schedule and an initially nervous group of purse string holders.

The popular and critical success of The Fellowship of the Ring vindicated Jackson's perseverance. Nevertheless, even as the Oscar nominations came pouring in, the director was moving on. The plaudits heaped upon the first installment would lose their luster if either of the succeeding episodes, The Two Towers and The Return of the King, failed to live up to expectations. And, considering the high ground occupied by The Fellowship of the Ring, the bar would be at an astronomical altitude for the other movies.

Of the three pieces of the Middle Earth puzzle, The Two Towers is the one with the biggest handicap. It is afflicted with the "middle chapter syndrome" - an inherent obstacle for the second episode of any trilogy. The Two Towers has no real beginning or end. (This is as true of the book as it is of the movie.) It takes situations and characters introduced in The Fellowship of the Ring and prepares them for The Return of the King. The trick is to immerse audiences "in the moment" and keep them from looking ahead - a daunting task, to be sure, but one that Jackson is up to.

In nearly every way that counts, The Two Towers is The Fellowship of the Ring's equal. In terms of tone, pacing, character development, plot advancement, and visual splendor, there is no drop-off. More importantly, the continuity is seamless (one advantage of filming the trilogy as a single project), allowing a viewer familiar with the first movie to flow effortlessly into the second. Of course, therein lies a drawback, as well. The Two Towers cannot stand on its own. Familiarity with The Fellowship of the Ring is not just advisable, it is mandatory. Anyone attempting to watch The Two Towers without having seen (or read) the first installment is headed for confusion and disillusionment.

Jackson has added dashes of mirth and romance to the film - two elements in short supply in the novel. Most of the humor, which is decidedly low-key, involves Gimli, who occasionally seems to be around as much for comic relief as anything else. For example, in the middle of the battle of Helm's Deep, he is infuriated that his number of kills can't keep pace with Legolas'. On the romantic front, Aragorn, who is promised to the elven princess Arwen (Liv Tyler), finds himself the object of attention for Theoden's niece, Eowyn (Miranda Otto). This sets up a triangle.

The Two Towers starts out a little slowly, but the rousing second half, which gathers momentum like a boulder racing downhill, will leave audiences craving more when the end credits roll. Combined, The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers represent one of the most engrossing and engaging six-hour segments of cinema I have ever enjoyed. If the final third of the puzzle is the equal of the first two, this will go down as one of the crowning achievements of cinema. Like its predecessor, The Two Towers is a great motion picture, and not to be missed by anyone who appreciates fantasy adventure.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

CinemaSinsMay 9, 2015

If there is a primary quality needed to bring J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings to the screen, it is vision - an attribute possessed in abundance by director Peter Jackson. In more than 100 years of motion pictures, few cinematicIf there is a primary quality needed to bring J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings to the screen, it is vision - an attribute possessed in abundance by director Peter Jackson. In more than 100 years of motion pictures, few cinematic campaigns of this magnitude have been mounted. Not only has Jackson faced the daunting task of creating and populating an entirely new world based on Tolkien's blueprint, but he has contended with the real-word rigors of a two-year shooting schedule and an initially nervous group of purse string holders.

The popular and critical success of The Fellowship of the Ring vindicated Jackson's perseverance. Nevertheless, even as the Oscar nominations came pouring in, the director was moving on. The plaudits heaped upon the first installment would lose their luster if either of the succeeding episodes, The Two Towers and The Return of the King, failed to live up to expectations. And, considering the high ground occupied by The Fellowship of the Ring, the bar would be at an astronomical altitude for the other movies.

Of the three pieces of the Middle Earth puzzle, The Two Towers is the one with the biggest handicap. It is afflicted with the "middle chapter syndrome" - an inherent obstacle for the second episode of any trilogy. The Two Towers has no real beginning or end. (This is as true of the book as it is of the movie.) It takes situations and characters introduced in The Fellowship of the Ring and prepares them for The Return of the King. The trick is to immerse audiences "in the moment" and keep them from looking ahead - a daunting task, to be sure, but one that Jackson is up to.

In nearly every way that counts, The Two Towers is The Fellowship of the Ring's equal. In terms of tone, pacing, character development, plot advancement, and visual splendor, there is no drop-off. More importantly, the continuity is seamless (one advantage of filming the trilogy as a single project), allowing a viewer familiar with the first movie to flow effortlessly into the second. Of course, therein lies a drawback, as well. The Two Towers cannot stand on its own. Familiarity with The Fellowship of the Ring is not just advisable, it is mandatory. Anyone attempting to watch The Two Towers without having seen (or read) the first installment is headed for confusion and disillusionment.

Jackson has added dashes of mirth and romance to the film - two elements in short supply in the novel. Most of the humor, which is decidedly low-key, involves Gimli, who occasionally seems to be around as much for comic relief as anything else. For example, in the middle of the battle of Helm's Deep, he is infuriated that his number of kills can't keep pace with Legolas'. On the romantic front, Aragorn, who is promised to the elven princess Arwen (Liv Tyler), finds himself the object of attention for Theoden's niece, Eowyn (Miranda Otto). This sets up a triangle.

The Two Towers starts out a little slowly, but the rousing second half, which gathers momentum like a boulder racing downhill, will leave audiences craving more when the end credits roll. Combined, The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers represent one of the most engrossing and engaging six-hour segments of cinema I have ever enjoyed. If the final third of the puzzle is the equal of the first two, this will go down as one of the crowning achievements of cinema. Like its predecessor, The Two Towers is a great motion picture, and not to be missed by anyone who appreciates fantasy adventure.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

mazewaxieMay 13, 2019

"The Two Towers", the second part of Peter Jackson's epic trilogy, is just as great (if not greater) as "The Fellowship of the Ring".

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

EpicLadySpongeJan 5, 2016

For 179 minutes, this is a well-worth running-out-of-things-to-say fun adventure movie despite how long it is. You'll probably enjoy it more than I have.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

gameguardian21Mar 9, 2016

While not as good as the other two, this still remains a fun and enjoyable movie that. With the movie now having two plots, it performs them spectacularly.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

CinemassacreMar 13, 2016

After venturing forth from paradise to traverse Middle-earth last year, Frodo & Co. push closer to hell in “The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers.” The middle section of director Peter Jackson’s prodigious adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien’s epicAfter venturing forth from paradise to traverse Middle-earth last year, Frodo & Co. push closer to hell in “The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers.” The middle section of director Peter Jackson’s prodigious adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien’s epic trilogy of good and evil is in some respects a more impressive film than its well received predecessor. Marked by nonstop conflict and a gargantuan climactic battle that Akira Kurosawa would have envied, the new picture has a sharper narrative focus and a livelier sense of forward movement than did the more episodic “Fellowship.” There can be no doubt that the vast majority of the worldwide public that gave the first entry an $860 worldwide gross will return for this amply satisfying second serving of fantastical adventure.

Certainly there can be few films so replete with images of death and portents of doom as is “The Two Towers.” At virtually every step, the mostly separated main characters are threatened with extinction, and looming over all is the specter of the gathering army of the dark wizard Saruman, whose victory would eliminate the last remaining bastion of significant resistance to his quest for total dominance over Middle-earth.

“It’s getting heavier,” laments Frodo (Elijah Wood) about the Ring to his genial companion Sam (Sean Astin) as they make their way across some imposing mountains en route to the dreaded Mordor, the only place the Ring can be destroyed so as to prevent the Dark Lord Sauron from establishing an empire of evil. The two Hobbits aren’t alone for long, however, as they apprehend the strange, vaguely threatening but ultimately pathetic creature named Gollum that’s been following them and now offers to guide them to Mordor.

But Gollum is an unsettling critter to have around. Naked save for a diaper-like loincloth, fidgety, skinny but large of hands, feet and skull, with strings of black hair and bulging, haunted blue eyes, Gollum looks like a preternatural Peter Lorre, a permanently scared and worried soul who’s compellingly revealed later on to be a hopeless schizophrenic, one twisted by his previous experience as a Ring bearer. “Acted” initially by Andy Serkis and subsequently reworked into exaggerated humanoid form via a dexterous CGI makeover, Gollum is a startling creation that constitutes one of the film’s major talking points.

All the same, this odd group doesn’t actually get very far in “The Two Towers,” as matters focus more on the heroic efforts of the warriors Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and Gimli the Dwarf (John Rhys-Davies) to help King Theoden of Rohan (Bernard Hill) in his seemingly hopeless defense of Rohan against Saruman’s army of 10,000 specially bred fighting beasts. All things considered, the handsome Aragorn would rather be back with his lady love, Arwen (Liv Tyler), but when duty calls, a man such as he has no choice.

Throughout, the film intercuts among a trio of story strands, the third recounting the strange detour of Frodo’s errant pals Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd) into Fangorn Forest, where they are snatched up by an ancient walking-and-talking tree called Treebeard (wonderfully voiced by the busy Rhys-Davies), who takes his own sweet time deciding what to do with the anxious Hobbits.

Without pausing to recap past action, Jackson and his co-screenwriters Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and Stephen Sinclair (the latter a new addition to the “Fellowship” trio) pick things up where they left off a year ago, and audiences will at once settle in for the yarn’s continuation in full confidence that there will be no let-down in storytelling sweep and spectacle.

Intrigue is rife in Rohan, where the king has been made into an impotent dodderer by venomous court adviser Wormtongue (Brad Dourif), who’s a spy for Saruman (Christopher Lee). All looks lost until Gandalf (Ian McKellen), who, after a fiery demise has been resurrected in angelic all-white glory, turns up to restore the king to his younger former self. Wormtongue is duly banished, while the king’s lovely niece, Eowyn (Miranda Otto), makes heavy eye contact with Aragorn.

Because of the pressure of momentous events and the lessened need for expository character delineation, the dialogue this time around tends toward the utilitarian and declamatory; with hardly an alteration, the very same words, given a different spin by the likes of John Cleese or Michael Palin, could be quite funny. But the grim mood established by the clouds of war and the muted blues, greens, grays and earth tones of Andrew Lesnie’s grand but mobile cinematography keep the proceedings sober as King Theoden and his people abandon their homes for the presumed safety of a mighty fortress, Helm’s Deep.

Thesps from “Fellowship” continue ably in the same vein here, and such newcomers as Otto, Hill, Dourif and Serkis add welcome new interest and flavor. Joining the behind-the-scenes crew are new editors Michael Horton and Jabez Olssen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MovieMasterEdMar 22, 2016

If there is a primary quality needed to bring J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings to the screen, it is vision - an attribute possessed in abundance by director Peter Jackson. In more than 100 years of motion pictures, few cinematicIf there is a primary quality needed to bring J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings to the screen, it is vision - an attribute possessed in abundance by director Peter Jackson. In more than 100 years of motion pictures, few cinematic campaigns of this magnitude have been mounted. Not only has Jackson faced the daunting task of creating and populating an entirely new world based on Tolkien's blueprint, but he has contended with the real-word rigors of a two-year shooting schedule and an initially nervous group of purse string holders.

The popular and critical success of The Fellowship of the Ring vindicated Jackson's perseverance. Nevertheless, even as the Oscar nominations came pouring in, the director was moving on. The plaudits heaped upon the first installment would lose their luster if either of the succeeding episodes, The Two Towers and The Return of the King, failed to live up to expectations. And, considering the high ground occupied by The Fellowship of the Ring, the bar would be at an astronomical altitude for the other movies.

Of the three pieces of the Middle Earth puzzle, The Two Towers is the one with the biggest handicap. It is afflicted with the "middle chapter syndrome" - an inherent obstacle for the second episode of any trilogy. The Two Towers has no real beginning or end. (This is as true of the book as it is of the movie.) It takes situations and characters introduced in The Fellowship of the Ring and prepares them for The Return of the King. The trick is to immerse audiences "in the moment" and keep them from looking ahead - a daunting task, to be sure, but one that Jackson is up to.

In nearly every way that counts, The Two Towers is The Fellowship of the Ring's equal. In terms of tone, pacing, character development, plot advancement, and visual splendor, there is no drop-off. More importantly, the continuity is seamless (one advantage of filming the trilogy as a single project), allowing a viewer familiar with the first movie to flow effortlessly into the second. Of course, therein lies a drawback, as well. The Two Towers cannot stand on its own. Familiarity with The Fellowship of the Ring is not just advisable, it is mandatory. Anyone attempting to watch The Two Towers without having seen (or read) the first installment is headed for confusion and disillusionment.

Jackson has added dashes of mirth and romance to the film - two elements in short supply in the novel. Most of the humor, which is decidedly low-key, involves Gimli, who occasionally seems to be around as much for comic relief as anything else. For example, in the middle of the battle of Helm's Deep, he is infuriated that his number of kills can't keep pace with Legolas'. On the romantic front, Aragorn, who is promised to the elven princess Arwen (Liv Tyler), finds himself the object of attention for Theoden's niece, Eowyn (Miranda Otto). This sets up a triangle.

The Two Towers starts out a little slowly, but the rousing second half, which gathers momentum like a boulder racing downhill, will leave audiences craving more when the end credits roll. Combined, The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers represent one of the most engrossing and engaging six-hour segments of cinema I have ever enjoyed. If the final third of the puzzle is the equal of the first two, this will go down as one of the crowning achievements of cinema. Like its predecessor, The Two Towers is a great motion picture, and not to be missed by anyone who appreciates fantasy adventure.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Aaron_WassermanMay 31, 2016

I am not the biggest Lord of the Rings fan, so I don't go crazy over these movies. This one really bored me and just seemed like the unnecessary middle chapter, it does have great acting, set pieces, visuals, costumes, and battles. But thoseI am not the biggest Lord of the Rings fan, so I don't go crazy over these movies. This one really bored me and just seemed like the unnecessary middle chapter, it does have great acting, set pieces, visuals, costumes, and battles. But those things can only rise this movie so far...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

superbatMay 27, 2020

The Two Towers is the worst movie in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which says a lot about the quality of this movie. All of the strengths from the previous movie are present in this film. There are more epic battle sequences. My main problemThe Two Towers is the worst movie in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which says a lot about the quality of this movie. All of the strengths from the previous movie are present in this film. There are more epic battle sequences. My main problem with this movie is that it feels like a transitional movie that drags on at times.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MasterRileyJul 20, 2016

The Two Towers continues what the first one did, greatness. It has great action, a great cast, a great story, great performances, great world building, and great music. One of the best novel to film adaptations ever.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

alejandro970Aug 4, 2019

Despite the Fellowship of the ring is broken, the task for destroying the sovereign ring goes on. The return of an important ally gives pieces of hope for the crew, while Frodo (every moment wasted by the burden) and Sam shall trust onDespite the Fellowship of the ring is broken, the task for destroying the sovereign ring goes on. The return of an important ally gives pieces of hope for the crew, while Frodo (every moment wasted by the burden) and Sam shall trust on loathsome and treacherous Gollum for get in Mordor. Pay attention for the battlefield of the Pit of Helm and the fallout of Isengard. Remarkable conceptual art and score by Howard shore. Get ready for the final strike.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheSpideyReviewFeb 5, 2018

Not as spectacle as the first, the sequel expands on the characters. It also gives new locations and characters that are important to the plot. Also it continues to show how dangerous the ring can be by showing how it's affecting him and 1Not as spectacle as the first, the sequel expands on the characters. It also gives new locations and characters that are important to the plot. Also it continues to show how dangerous the ring can be by showing how it's affecting him and 1 other character (don't know if it's a spoiler to say).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Thatonenerd2187Jan 26, 2017

The twin towers improves much on it's sequel. The action is better shot and much more exciting than fellowship. It especially works because of how tense it it. The characters shine once again, and their journey only makes them better. LegolasThe twin towers improves much on it's sequel. The action is better shot and much more exciting than fellowship. It especially works because of how tense it it. The characters shine once again, and their journey only makes them better. Legolas and Gimli for example have been much improved, since they didn't have to much to do in the fellowship. Here they both have a great chemistry together and makes the film more fun to watch. The story itself is much more dramatic than the first one, with character moments that really outshine the original, and give more depth to them. The soundtrack in this movie is very solid, with each piece of the score fitting in with the tone just fine, and it's also very memorable. The practical effects look just as good as ever and the movie still holds up to this day. Overall, the twin towers is a sequel that improves on the original, and I would recommend it to anyone who loved the first movie, or just wants to see a great film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

frederik1478Aug 19, 2023

It has some of the best moments of The Lord of the Rings but it also has the most feeling of not having a satisfying conclusion in some stories of part which is just sad thing about being the middle of the story you can't always have the mostIt has some of the best moments of The Lord of the Rings but it also has the most feeling of not having a satisfying conclusion in some stories of part which is just sad thing about being the middle of the story you can't always have the most satisfying things when you're not the ending.

A really enjoyed the theme of Hope in the movie and not giving up to despair always hoping for things to go well and keeping on it was a nice theme to have in the movie.

It's still looks fantastic. It sounds fantastic. It has some beautiful scenes with trees. I will not say anymore. It is just all around an amazing movie and the last part of it is my favorite siege in a movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

opethagallochNov 19, 2017

Why is this movie so good? How the hell did Peter Jackson manage to create such a masterpiece, and release it only one year after one of the already best movies of all time? How does it even manage to keep you hooked to the screen even ifWhy is this movie so good? How the hell did Peter Jackson manage to create such a masterpiece, and release it only one year after one of the already best movies of all time? How does it even manage to keep you hooked to the screen even if it's 3 hours long? These are the questions I always ask myself when I rewatch The Two Towers.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JPKJun 22, 2019

Nearly Equals Empire
The Two Towers is breathtaking, exciting, epic, and dark, Plus the performances are once again amazing (Especially Wood, Mckellen, and Serkis).

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ANTtheKNEEEENov 19, 2021

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018

One of the best fantasy movies ever made. The casting is phenomenal nobody feels out of place. Pretty interesting adaptation of Tolkien works. Two is my favourite of the three movies for sure. Due to a large part Théoden and Sam journey (onOne of the best fantasy movies ever made. The casting is phenomenal nobody feels out of place. Pretty interesting adaptation of Tolkien works. Two is my favourite of the three movies for sure. Due to a large part Théoden and Sam journey (on so many levels).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

PikeaxMar 9, 2019

This is based on the extended edition and encompasses all three LotR movies.
This movie is a classic. Tolkien's world is brought to life in truly epic fashion here. Sure it runs long, but that length ensures that nothing in the story is leftThis is based on the extended edition and encompasses all three LotR movies.
This movie is a classic. Tolkien's world is brought to life in truly epic fashion here. Sure it runs long, but that length ensures that nothing in the story is left out. I suggest judging all three Lord of the Rings movies as one collective whole, rather than as three stand alone movies. This trilogy was meant to be watched this way and the experience isn't complete without that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

tiagomacedsFeb 20, 2018

As Duas Torres é o filme mais inferior da trilogia mas mesmo assim consegue ser épico e maravilhoso como os outros dois, merecendo nota máxima

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

kilgrimMar 22, 2021

This was the last film/trilogy that surprised me - for me it marks the end of cinema - about no film after it I could say "that's new!"

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

spacebear1Jan 5, 2018

Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is a flawless sequel to a flawless masterpiece. I once again loved the characters and the story. The cinematography was once again flawless as well as the epic battle sequences. In the end, this is anotherLord of the Rings: The Two Towers is a flawless sequel to a flawless masterpiece. I once again loved the characters and the story. The cinematography was once again flawless as well as the epic battle sequences. In the end, this is another flawless masterpiece in this amazing trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

TheRussianatorApr 10, 2018

The sequel to the Fellowship is as good if not better as the first one. The smart development of the characters, breathtaking action sequences help this movie not suffer from the "middle chapter" syndrome and leaves the audience eager for theThe sequel to the Fellowship is as good if not better as the first one. The smart development of the characters, breathtaking action sequences help this movie not suffer from the "middle chapter" syndrome and leaves the audience eager for the conclusion of the trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Jaredc324Dec 11, 2019

Even if Two Towers doesn't match Fellowship with the same level of enticement or Magic, it still brings so much to the table, enlivening it's heartfelt focus of danger within it's heroes like never before. And it stands tall as a measuringEven if Two Towers doesn't match Fellowship with the same level of enticement or Magic, it still brings so much to the table, enlivening it's heartfelt focus of danger within it's heroes like never before. And it stands tall as a measuring stick of fantasy films and carries an undeniable breath of heroism and bravery that gives this trilogy and it's characters a sense of adversity to make it's ultimate pay off become something more than just getting the job done. Peter is creating depth from friction, and it's setting for a wondrous finale.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

drone41Feb 9, 2018

The second part of unbelievable trilogy. Much interesting and tense is on the higher level.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

FilipeNetoFeb 17, 2018

This is the continuation of "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy, based on the epic novel that J.R.R. Tolkien wrote after his passage through the trenches in First World War. This film was shot by the same cast and crew of the first, "TheThis is the continuation of "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy, based on the epic novel that J.R.R. Tolkien wrote after his passage through the trenches in First World War. This film was shot by the same cast and crew of the first, "The Fellowship of the Ring", a strategy that has given a great cohesion to the entire trilogy. In this film, the plot thickens with the division of the Fellowship: Frodo and Sam desperately trying to get to Mordor while the men, grouped around the kingdom of Rohan, begin the war against the orc's and uruk's of Sauron and Saruman. The climax of the film, the battle of Helm's Deep, is probably one of the most tense and epic battle scenes in history of contemporary cinema. From this point of view, this film surpasses in adrenaline the first of the saga. For the action scenes, the expertise of digital computerization was key. Proof of this is the character Gollum, a completely digital creation that received the voice of Andy Serkis, or Treebeard, who has the voice of John Rhys-Davies (actor who also plays Gimli).

This film helped to increase the interest of the audience for the trilogy that until then, and despite the success of the first film, had gone unnoticed for many. In fact, if we think rightly, the trilogy has even popularize Tolkien, an English writer who, until then, was an illustrious unknown to almost all those who weren't English or don't speak English as their mother tongue. Suddenly, not only everyone spoke of "The Lord of the Rings" and Tolkien, as well as the novels it had to be translated into new languages and were the subject of an important and positive revaluation.

Epic in the true word of the term, this film, and the whole trilogy, learned once again become popular this genre of cinema, that now became more affordable for studios thanks to the computerization. In fact, make an epic film in the old fashioned way, with hundreds of participants, large and elaborate scenarios etc. it's extremely expensive, more than resorting to the modern digital techniques.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

filmbuff96Mar 14, 2018

An amazing story with great action. The Two Towers keeps the trilogy alive and amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

karatistosJan 19, 2020

The Peter Jackson's director's cut of the Lord of the Rings trilogy remain as the zenith of cinematographic achievement.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Star_ScreamNov 9, 2019

Amazing movie. Beautifully filmed, wonderful score, great story and it has the best battle sequence ever filmed

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

HolyDarthYodaMay 20, 2018

This movie is just a little bit not as good as the first one. In this movie is more battles and more visual then the first one, but it is not as emotional journey as the first movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

StavNeuseJul 17, 2018

The performances better, the cinematography better, and the acting better. I mean, what more can you ask from the second movie of a trilogy. That battle scene at the end was priceless, I mean, just genius directing and performances.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

meydianarizki21Oct 25, 2022

"The Two Towers" is another excellent installment in the excellent Lord of the Rings Trilogy. The movie also features amazing special effects with Gollum, dramatic political tension in Rohan, and fantastic moments with the Ents. There's also"The Two Towers" is another excellent installment in the excellent Lord of the Rings Trilogy. The movie also features amazing special effects with Gollum, dramatic political tension in Rohan, and fantastic moments with the Ents. There's also beautiful moments between Aragorn and Arwen. The costumes, weapons, armor, props and movie sets are very well crafted. The landscapes and scenery of New Zealand are beautiful. Treebeard and the Ents are very well done in CGI. The ents are curiously wise and well spoken. The CGI incarnation of Gollum/Smeagol was incredibly emotive and powerful as it portrays Gollum as profoundly disturbing, amusing and almost lovable all at the same time. Hence, Gollum is still a CGI masterpiece. The special effects for the ents, the mumakil, the wargs, Sauron's eye and the fellbeast are very incredible. The filming locations and the movie sets for the Kingdom of Rohan look gorgeous. The Rohirrim are a sight to behold and do conjure images of the lost Anglo-Saxons.The acting is superb with an amazing cast. Sir Ian McKellen as Gandalf and Sir Christopher Lee as Saruman are flawless. Sean Astin was born for the role as Samwise Gamgee and portrays Sam's character perfectly. Andy Serkis gave an astonishing performance as Gollum. Elijah Wood Dominic Monaghan as Merry and Billy Boyd as Pippin still make for a delightful duo. Viggo Mortensen's performance as Aragorn is visceral and sensitive with physical dexterity, along with being an empathic, warmer and fundamentally human in presence and charisma. Orlando Bloom still pulls of as Legolas very well. John Rhys-Davies is still brilliant and hilarious as Gimli. Bernard Hill gives a very perfect performance as King Theoden. Miranda Otto as Eowyn and Karl Urban as Eomer were excellent. David Wenham was a very good choice for the role as Faramir. Brad Douris gives a superb performance as Grima Wormtongue. The Battle of Helm's Deep is still one of the best movie battle scenes in cinema history. The scene where Haldir (Craig Parker) arrives with an army of Galadhirm elven warrirors at Helm's Deep to aid the men of Rohan is still one of highlights of The Two Towers movie. The action and fighting scenes at Helm's deep is epic and perfectly executed. The choreography of the battle, the visual effects, the pacing, acting, cinematography, and music, all work together in perfection to achieve grand filmmaking. The downfall of Frodo as the ring slowly takes hold of him is very well done. The battles of Helms Deep and Isengard are truly breathtaking. The ents marching off to war and tearing down Isengard is still a very breathtaking and powerful moment. The scene where Gandalf and Eomer arrive with an army of Rohirrim, charging down a hill at the Uruk hai and turning the tide of battle at Helm's Deep is astonishing. Samwise Gamgee's "some good things in the world worth fighting for" speech to Frodo is very enlightening and provides positive motivation. The theme song for the kingdom of Rohan is very splendid. "Gollum's Song" by Emilíana Torrini is a haunting beautiful and suspenseful song that plays at the movie credits. Peter Jackson's "The Two Towers" is one wonderful interpretation of the epic story. A spectacular adventure action experience..… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ErikTheCriticSep 25, 2018

With Andy Serkis stealing the show as Gollum, and consisting of relentless battle sequences, "The Two Towers" absolutely lives up to its predecessor, and it is a splendid addition in the trilogy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MartyMcFlyOct 2, 2018

My score 99
Metascore / User score 87 / 90
Tomatometer / Audience score 95 / 95
IMDB 87
(92.2)

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

kaneturnerNov 3, 2018

I treat all three instalments of the Lord of the Rings trilogy as one film, because that's how they play. The sense of adventure and the enormity of the story is something that no other film has ever done.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Kirollos-NoahDec 2, 2018

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is once again directed by Peter Jackson, taken from J.R.R. Tolkien's novel, screenplay by Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Stephen Sinclair and Peter Jackson. All of them are the same from the first one,The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is once again directed by Peter Jackson, taken from J.R.R. Tolkien's novel, screenplay by Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Stephen Sinclair and Peter Jackson. All of them are the same from the first one, except for Stephen Sinclair. Starring Elijah Wood, Ian McKellen, Viggo Mortensen and Sean Astin.

The story continues with Frodo and Sam trying to destroy the ring, during the journey they met Gollum. Meanwhile, Aragorn, drawing closer to his kingly destiny, rallies forces of good for the battles that must come.

If you read my first review of The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, so you already know that I loved how they set the characters and how they made the special effects, etc... And you also know that I didn't like the performance, and the direction sometimes wasn't good for me. So I watched this one and I was hoping to see these flaws got fixed. So, did they fix it? Not that much to be noticed, but as a middle chapter of a trilogy setting all paces for the final one, The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is completely amazing, also for the fans of the book and The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers has lots of amazing special effects just like the first one, I was still amazed of how talented and unique the creators of this movie were, I mean some movies were released in the same year but the special effects weren't that good, not even close.

The performances on the other hand are the same, the only one that was brilliant is Andy Serkis as Gollum, all the others are the very same, and I didn't like them before, so it's the same problem, but Andy Serkis improved it.

I liked the direction a little tiny pit more than the first one.

So technically, as it's obvious, I liked The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers more than The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, especially the story, which was fast-paced and better than the first one. So as it's improved, it's definitely getting a higher grade, so I'm gonna give The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers an A!

I really had lots of fun, while talking with you about The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring and The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, and I'm so excited to talk to you about The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, and it's gonna be very soon.

Alright, guys thank you for reading my review, hope you like, and if you do, please, support my work to encourage me to carry one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

HunieKZSep 5, 2022

some minor changes are acceptable .the best films in the world in my opinion. i read tolkien books. it is about %90 - %95 compatible with the story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

AMasterpieceFanJan 5, 2019

Copied from the first movie review since they're all basically the same

The first movie/trilogy that really impressed me. Astonishing visuals, amazing characters, fantastic worldbuilding. Easily the best movie franchise I have seen.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

YesterJan 25, 2020

The visual and the soundtrack are so good. The technical expertise that went into some of the battle is absolutely astounding.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MurphyBrandonSep 15, 2019

In my personal opinion, "The Two Towers" was the best movie of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. I say this because the pacing was perfect, there were hidden messages, and most effects were real. We really got to know the characters better, andIn my personal opinion, "The Two Towers" was the best movie of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. I say this because the pacing was perfect, there were hidden messages, and most effects were real. We really got to know the characters better, and it maintained coherence with several moving parts all at once. Additionally, the music was phenomenal.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

glommanDec 31, 2019

One of the most thrilling and interesting movies made to this day, the battle of Helm's Deep deserves an Oscar on its own.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DiptanshuJul 1, 2020

Incredibly Epic,A Masterpiece!literally every aspect of it the music,the acting,the story and the CGI and Visuals it was pure Art.as a sequel it extends every aspect amazingly,the story line of back and forth between characters and thereIncredibly Epic,A Masterpiece!literally every aspect of it the music,the acting,the story and the CGI and Visuals it was pure Art.as a sequel it extends every aspect amazingly,the story line of back and forth between characters and there adventures are engaging,the starting continuation from prequel and the base for all story-lines it was amazing,the Frodo's meet with gollum and there journey with the Behaviour changes of Frodo because of Ring and the up's and down's handled by Sam and the friendship of both was great literally at last when Sam says we are going to be remembered as story and all it was satisfying as hell moment,the Talking tree and two Hobbits journey were amazing and fun.at end the encouragement of hobbit to trees to take part at war and all it was amazing and incredible,the Trio of elf,dwarf and men it was iconic and amazing.at start the journey to find two hobbits and then Gandalf's return it was The most satisfying moment then the city of Rohan's conflict and build-up for war and amazing love build-up for Aragon it was great,the saruman's quest for ring and the dragon rider was baddass and the other side the Sauron's army gathering and the 1st fight with Rohan's was awesome the falling scene of Aragon was surprising with the whole alert thing for people then the whole planning and build-up while the other side's the Gondor army and Frodo's thing it was engaging,the gollum's split personality talks and Sam's argument with Frodo about ring and Gollum it was emotionally strong.the all story-lines connection at end was freaking brilliant the final act was literally goosebumps its pure art the battle of Rohan's and other side at gondor's both against saruman,sauron it was breathtakingly awesome,the fight was epic,the loosing hope for Rohan's and the twist at last with help of elf's and others with Gandalf's return to fight it was literally Goosebumps moment then the action and the Goddamn visuals and music it was literally the greatest experience,the other side the tree's destroying the saruman's tower and all it was freaking satisfying and epic end,the ending was literally stunningly brilliant and amazing it automatically Hypes for next sequel.Overall its literally a greatest sequel and epic experience its a Incredible Masterpiece it's a Pure Art!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

AyiurahOct 3, 2019

Perfection does not exist, but this is so damn close to it! Thank you so much for everyone who worked on the Lord of the Rings. You have all changed my life in so many ways and I will always be able to return to this work of art. A veryPerfection does not exist, but this is so damn close to it! Thank you so much for everyone who worked on the Lord of the Rings. You have all changed my life in so many ways and I will always be able to return to this work of art. A very special mention for Howard Shore: this trilogy would not have been half as good as what it is without your masterpiece. Thank you.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Mendax89Dec 10, 2019

The best movie of the trilogy, a masterpiece, flawless.
A must watch. A true classic.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

QlachPLJan 1, 2020

top classic - one of those films that will be with us for decades. An absolute masterpiece of cinematography and soundtracks!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ereleonOct 25, 2021

Luckily due to the three films being made all at the same time, the two towers continues on the success and the momentum of the first movie without any inconsistenciess, on par with the first film for sure

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

BruterakeSep 11, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Luta boa da porra diversão dando pico nesses filme ta maluco n consigo conceber quem viu isso quando lançou devia ser a coisa mais incrível do mundo.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

RobwinzDec 11, 2020

The Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers is honestly a brilliant sequel and it's even a masterpiece and a half. The movie's got a brilliant story, which follows on straight after the first movie and it's about Frodo (Elijah Wood) and Sam (SeanThe Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers is honestly a brilliant sequel and it's even a masterpiece and a half. The movie's got a brilliant story, which follows on straight after the first movie and it's about Frodo (Elijah Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin) arriving to Mordor with the help of Gollum (Andy Serkis).

A number of new allies join their companions team to defend the well known Isengard, while Saruman (Christopher Lee) deploys an assault from his territory.

The cast are all honestly brilliant with their performances throughout this movie and the same goes with their dialogue. All of the characters dialogue which is given throughout this movie is all honestly great and non of their dialogue feels weak at all.

The cinematography which was shot by Andrew Lesnie, who did the first one's cinematography does another brilliant job at capturing the scenes so smooth and so beautifully. He does it so well and he makes the scenes look so amazing.

Also, there's a lot more of the action sequences throughout this movie and they are very clever, very graphic and very unique just like the first ones were and they are all very well choreographed.

The movie's even got such a beautiful soundtrack, the score which was beautifully composed by Howard Leslie Shore OC. He does such a great job with the soundtrack and it goes so well with the scenes they've been placed within this movie.

The movie's even got some brilliant humour, which always hits and it never misses. That's mainly from Gimli (John Rhys-Davies) his character adds some really funny humour throughout this movie, which adds to his character quite a bit.

The movie's even got more dark themes (In my opinion), they add a lot more to the different locations which we end up discovering throughout this movie and it's done so well, which I really liked.

Finally, the love interest in this movie is very well built up and it doesn't feel rushed at all, it's a very interesting one and I think it works quite a bit.

The pacing which this movie's got is all honestly brilliant and all of the moments are all built up very well and non of those scenes fail in any sort of way because they are all built up brilliantly.

The orcs throughout this movie have got more of a darker and more of a graphic look to them, which I think added a bit more of a disturbing look to them, which I really liked.

Overall, Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers is honestly a brilliant sequel. The movie's got a brilliant story, brilliant performances, great dialogue, beautiful cinematography, clever action sequences, brilliant pacing, a beautiful soundtrack, brilliant humour, dark themes, more disturbing looking orcs and an interesting love interest.

I'd honestly recommend this movie, if you enjoyed the first one and if you're into fantasy/action movie's. I think this movie is honestly worth the watch and you'll probably enjoy it as much as the first one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

r96skFeb 16, 2021

I might not have enjoyed it as much as the first film, but 'The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers' is still a terrific film no doubt.

Visually it still looks superb, I really do love the look of these films so far. The main plot is engagingI might not have enjoyed it as much as the first film, but 'The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers' is still a terrific film no doubt.

Visually it still looks superb, I really do love the look of these films so far. The main plot is engaging and very interesting, while things like the costumes et al. remain at a high level. There is also top action, including some noteworthy battle sequences.

There are, though, a few bits I found less great - still very good in the grand overall scheme, but just comparably with the 2001 release. I found the pacing to be slightly off in moments, while a few of the new cast members didn't connect to me - e.g. Bernard Hill. The side story, meanwhile, with Billy Boyd and Dominic Monaghan didn't interest me at all... they spend too much of the run time just walking through a forest.

Elijah Wood remains good though. I did enjoy seeing the journey of Frodo and Sam (Sean Astin). Andy Serkis also gets more screen time with that aforementioned duo as Gollum, which is most definitely only a major positive - a fun character! Any scene with those three = outstanding.

Overall, as noted, it is still an excellent film. One very much worthy of following 'The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring', despite a few 'issues' I have with it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Movie_FreakJun 16, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy is the greatest trilogy of all time, and all the movies are one of the best films ever made, and that's saying a big thing for movies released in the 2000s. You can simply put any of them on top if you rank the 3 films, and whichever film at the bottom won't actually be last. When I say The Two Towers is at the bottom of the list, I still think it's a freaking amazing film. I don't really know why people say it has 'middle chapter narrative problems' because there's nothing of the sort here. The sets are even more grand than the original, and the visuals are no less seamless. It has great costumes and the premise is as epic as it's predecessor.The main triumph of the film is the creation of Gollum. Nobody thought that Jackson would be able to reimagine Gollum's description in the book, but boy it's sensational. From his raspy, scary voice and amazingly created body, I'm willing to say it's one of the most amazing visual achievements for the last 20 years. While it's not quite a flawless film, with it splitting into 3 periods, it might seem awkward and overlong at times. But that definitely doesn't disguise the battles. The battle with the Wargs is a damned great sequence, and the battle of Helm's deep is one of the greatest battles of all time. A sensational sequel!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

pur__0_0__Jun 21, 2021

The Lord of the Rings is one long story divided among three movies, which is the reason why it is hard to review this movie in itself. I have already written a review for The Fellowship of the Ring, in which I talked about how awesome theThe Lord of the Rings is one long story divided among three movies, which is the reason why it is hard to review this movie in itself. I have already written a review for The Fellowship of the Ring, in which I talked about how awesome the visuals of the story are, the philosophy behind the ring and the pop culture icon that it became. That is why I won't talk about those things in this review. Rather I will talk about the characters of the movie and why it has such a huge impact in the pop culture in spite of being nearly 20 years old book adaptation.

Percy Jackson has done a really great job. The story picks up from the part where Gandalf was attacked, except this time it happens from the other point of view. This not only helps the viewer remember an incident that was important from the previous movie, but also makes it interesting by not showing the exact same shots again. While previously we believed Gandalf to be just a weak old man, over here he turned out to be a strong wizard. This is the reason why it paid off to see him return as Gandalf the White.

The thing I really like aobut Gandalf is that he is a perfect balance of powerful and emotional character. In one moment he is being spun around by Saruman where he is crying like a frail old man, and in the very next scene he is fighting a fire dragon. In the first movie he scared Bilbo for a second by threatening him with magic if he dared to wear the ring, but immediately after he joined the Hobbits in the party. This is the trait which adds character depth to him, preventing him from being a two dimensional person. This way we get to see him from multiple perspectives.

The second character I'd talk about here would be Gollum. The first time I saw him I thought he's just another one of those cringy skinny characters every fantasy movie needs to have (Jar Jar from Star Wars prequels, Dobby from Harry Potter etc). But he's very different. Earlier he was just a normal person like the rest of us. However, it was the temptation of the ring that completely ruined him, not just emotionally but physically too. Now in spite of his immortality he wastes himself searching for an addiction he has never been able to get away from. This is the reason why in spite of not actually wanting to hurt Frodo, he is unable to convince himself that what he is doing is actually wrong. This message is very clear in the scene where he is talking to himself.

Speaking of the scene where Gollum talks to himself, that scene is one of the many scenes which is able to show the emotions that the characters wanted to express. This is something that can be done only by a good cinematography, which is something Peter Jackson was able to handle. Even though that scene is ridiculed, the point behind the scene was to show how Gollum was feeling while planning to kill Frodo and not how he was actually looking like. There have been plenty of scenes where the characters have conversations, but I don't want to spoil the movie for you.

And that scene was interrupted by Sam, who is the next character I'd speak about. Sam is Frodo's best friend and he can go to any limits to make sure Frodo is safe. He is absolutely pure of mind, which was shown in the first movie when he stopped Frodo from wearing the ring. Sam had heard that Gollum wanted to kill Frodo and even though Gollum was the only one character who could actually help them reach the Mountain of Doom, Sam was ready to take the risk even if it meant having to get lost. Frodo didn't trust him or rather should I say, didn't WANT to trust him. And in spite of being abandoned by his best friend, Sam never wasted any time to get back to saving Frodo.

The movie also has many battle scenes, cool CGI, shows the Fellowship of the Ring fight alongside other kingdoms while Gandalf is not there to protect them. The action, the comic timings, the CGI, the acting, everything about this movie is absolutely great. The only mistake I made watching this was that I watched the theatrical cut of this movie. Because of this I missed a very important (and cool) scene from the story, which I was thinking would be answered in Return of the King. It has something to do with Saruman. So don't make that mistake. I'd say you should watch the long one, no matter how much more you have to watch.

The Two Towers is the most underrated movie of the trilogy and I really wish it was talked about more. Only those people know about it who have watched the trilogy. That doesn't mean it's bad. That just means this trilogy should be watched more. Since The Fellowship of the Ring is the beginning of the adventures and The Return of the King is the conclusion, The Two Towers never gets any appreciation as it is sandwiched between the two. But in reality it is the movie which bridges the two. It is an essential part of the movie since this is where the maximum amount of character development takes place.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

TuhkakasaSep 2, 2022

I just admire how they managed adapt Tolkien work into movie. You should watch extended version, so much was left out.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Cementer200Sep 27, 2020

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is one of the best movies of all time. the journey to the destroy the ring defeat sauron and save middle earth continues right were it left off in the first movie

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ParzivaISep 9, 2022

Esto si representa el mundo Tolkien, no como la nueva serie progre de prime vídeo. Aquí los elfos son rubios, los enanos barbudos y los hobbits blancos y con pies con pelo, como debe ser.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Gorbunov2004May 5, 2021

Отличный фильм всегда в нём любил смотреть на осаду хельмовой ради очень эпично выглядит!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

AreegosSep 9, 2023

My favorite part of trilogy. Great battles, Gandellf's comeback. I like that adventure!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

noob328Feb 15, 2022

The Two Towers is equally as good as the first but with bigger and better battle sequences. It has even more adeventure and even mixes in some comedy in that makes the movie flow perfectly

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

HardRockLiveSep 27, 2022

Watched it like a 100 times and will watch more. This is the best movie fantasy ever.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

iCampoRamilNov 16, 2021

Magistrales combates, magistrales actuaciones. Cine épico del bueno, yasss!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

I also share the opinion that its the worst of the trilogy. Nevertheless it has many memorable and amazing scenes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheSikvelOct 14, 2021

This part is as beautiful as the previous one, but I liked this one better. In general, everything is the same as in the first film, only larger and more interesting]

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

JJ2FAS4UDec 29, 2021

----------------------------------9.2/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

GemsicleDec 20, 2021

For the audience, it has been a year since we reached the end of the first snippet of the journey through Middle Earth, but for the characters, it has been a couple of hours, which as it happens, in terms of the beginning of the film'sFor the audience, it has been a year since we reached the end of the first snippet of the journey through Middle Earth, but for the characters, it has been a couple of hours, which as it happens, in terms of the beginning of the film's production after wrapping up the first. The second chapter introduces us with a roar as a divulged melee descends to water in the mines of Moria, when we believed that Gandalf was extinguished with the Balrog. The first film concludes with the Fellowship disintegrating on their own expedition to save Middle Earth and collide with a dilemma of their own. Frodo and Sam are resuming their hitchhike to Mount Doom to destroy the One Ring and are confidentially leaving their footprints distinguishable to a creature on their heels, known as Smeagol, or preferably “Gollum.” The exceptionally comprehended Sir Christopher Lee, who plays Gandalf’s mirror image, Saruman is continuing to multiply an army of Orcs who continue to collapse tree after tree for space to create more cocoons of Orcs. As the imminent prisoners of Saruman, Merry and Pippin flee from a multitude of Orcs during their prosperous meal time in a multitude of Ents, whom they befriend and chat about their purposes throughout their portion of the film.

One of the few reasons why I like The Two Towers more than The Fellowship of the Ring is that the characters and stories are now acknowledged and we experience more exhilarating mobs of brawl sequences that take place in the last hour of this flick in Helm’s Deep. With Gollum chaperoning the Hobbits to Mordor (wink wink), Sam begins to seek sins in Gollum’s guts because of him letting the ring out of the bag and cries the name of its bearer and have pervasive contrasting influences. With Sam’s suspicion and Gollum’s diabolical and surreptitious intentions, a “friend vs foe” for companion battle begins.

As the bridge chapter in Lord of the Rings, it unveils ways to create a positive army against the negative army, who is the only thing that is barricaded in the positives’ road to Mordor. Although there is no beginning or end, The Two Towers has pacing that is more meticulous than what you might expect and is a recommendation at the tipping point. We also get more time shown in the colossal, yet glorious mountainous surfaces integrated from New Zealand to Middle Earth.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MikhailSoloJan 12, 2022

Good sequel, very good movie.You've become more interesting to follow the characters.Mr.My Darling appeared.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

liamexeOct 13, 2022

The technically flawless second edition of the Lord of the Rings trilogy is the best representation of the Middle Earth world available. In this grand conflict between good and evil, the characters offer the audience a lot to cling onto asThe technically flawless second edition of the Lord of the Rings trilogy is the best representation of the Middle Earth world available. In this grand conflict between good and evil, the characters offer the audience a lot to cling onto as well. In this episode, Frodo and Sam continue their search for Moldor in order to destroy the ring, and they are using technology to follow Gollum, who is portrayed by Andy Serkis. We follow a few Hobbits and their tree companions, a few other fellowship members as they attempt to aid Gondor in fending off its foes, and the ascent of the wizard of Gondorf in a few of the side stories. The stories all flow together and have the same good against evil theme.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Drizzt-Do-UrdenJun 4, 2022

I love Gimli and Legolas in this movie. Theoden, Faramir, Frodo, Sam and Pippen also stand out for me. But honestlythe whole cast is perfect and I believe every performance

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JohnnyYouHitMeAug 10, 2022

Probably the best of the bunch. Mainly because we got so much of Christopher Lee and Bernard Hill. Jackson deserves credit for the way he handled the Rohirrim. It would've been so easy to make them generic, lowest common denominator 'VikingsProbably the best of the bunch. Mainly because we got so much of Christopher Lee and Bernard Hill. Jackson deserves credit for the way he handled the Rohirrim. It would've been so easy to make them generic, lowest common denominator 'Vikings on horses', but instead he stayed true to how Tolkien wrote them. In the extended version Eowyn even sings a lament for her dead brother in Old English, which was specially written for this movie. Helm's Deep is my favourite part of all three movies, so 8/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

TheGreatNikakisAug 4, 2022

The Two Towers picks up where the Fellowship of the Ring ended without ever dropping in quality. Instead, it enhances the experience of the first movie with the incredible performance of Andy Serkis as Gollum and the best battle ever put to film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

AlfadasSep 7, 2022

I can't believe I have been watching this movie for 20 years now. Thanks to everyone involved in this masterclass of using attention to detail, passion and focus on storytelling to bring a rich story to life.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MakuziSep 10, 2022

The lord of the rings trilogy are the best movies I've ever seen in my life.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Manuel189qqSep 23, 2022

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

GiugiOct 2, 2022

Second chapter of the legendary saga about the ring of power. This chapter puts a patch on the main error of the first that is the extreme and aberrant slowness thanks to some points and some gimmicks that make the film much faster and moreSecond chapter of the legendary saga about the ring of power. This chapter puts a patch on the main error of the first that is the extreme and aberrant slowness thanks to some points and some gimmicks that make the film much faster and more compelling than its predecessor. The film is very enjoyable and the fantastic characters are masterfully made, with particular attention to the trees, fascinating and reasoned characters. The continuation of the poaching path is also rendered very well with the weight of the ring becoming more and more felt and the battle in the gorge is wonderful and very well done.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Manuel89qqNov 2, 2022

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

hulkingmediaNov 23, 2022

What a Movie, What a Trilogy

EPIC... is the word that comes to mind. IF you have not yet watch these films, PLEASE do yourself the favour and go WATCH these films! To think of all the hard work that went into creating these films... And aWhat a Movie, What a Trilogy

EPIC... is the word that comes to mind.

IF you have not yet watch these films, PLEASE do yourself the favour and go WATCH these films!

To think of all the hard work that went into creating these films... And a low budget as well. Many many hand made costumes and film sets.

Big Battles, Good Acting and beautiful music. What more can you ask for in a movie. And you get to see Elves, Orcs, Dwarves, Wizards, Hobbits and Humans as well as mythical creatures.

I believe these movies are the best Fantasy films in existance!

Thank you Peter Jackson and ofcourse J.R.R. Tolkien.
HulkingMedia on Letterboxd @ boxd.it/3rlD1… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

xSubjectX420Apr 18, 2023

Easily the GOAT with one of the most epic war scenes in all of cinema's history.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

tleonFeb 24, 2023

It somewhat suffers from being the middle chapter in the trilogy, but it still manages to keep the momentum going for the final chapter of the trilogy

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Fixer84Mar 16, 2023

The "least beautiful", allow me this term, of the LOTR trilogy, but we are still talking about very high quality and an excellent product.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

NoahsNexusApr 5, 2023

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is a masterpiece of epic storytelling that never fails to captivate me. From the incredible cinematography to the unforgettable performances of its cast, this film is a true work of art. The battleThe Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is a masterpiece of epic storytelling that never fails to captivate me. From the incredible cinematography to the unforgettable performances of its cast, this film is a true work of art. The battle sequences are breathtaking and the special effects are stunning, immersing me in the fantastical world of Middle-earth. As a fan of J.R.R. Tolkien's books, I was thrilled to see the story come to life on the big screen with such care and attention to detail. I've watched this film countless times and it never gets old. Each time, I'm reminded of why I fell in love with this story in the first place. The Two Towers is a triumph of cinema and a must-see for anyone who loves epic adventures.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DinoHippieMay 12, 2023

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Battle of Helm's Deep!!! OH MY GOD! The best scene of the movie, also Smeagol is a CGI miracle and Andy Serkis made an unforgettable performance… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

User Reviews