The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

0

SteveI.Jan 8, 2004

ZZzzzZzZzZzZzZz, thank god this boring trash is done and finished with. I didn't think this movie would ever end. We won't have to deal with it next year. THANK GOD.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

3

brandonbMar 27, 2004

i enjoyed the previous two but as i was watching ROTK, i started to ask questions like what is the eye going to do with a ring?, or if it was forged from the other rings, then why it it better than the other rings? it's a fake!, andi enjoyed the previous two but as i was watching ROTK, i started to ask questions like what is the eye going to do with a ring?, or if it was forged from the other rings, then why it it better than the other rings? it's a fake!, and lastly, why diddnt they go to the ghosts sooner? it would have saved everyone a whole lot of work and agony since the ghosts killed ALL the bad guys in 5 minutes without casualty. someone please explain these things and maybe i'll reconsider. maybe i wasnt paying attention, maybe im thinking too much, or maybe i should read the books. till then, this movie definetely doesn't deserve 11 oscars and it definetely won't get a 10. it was long, cheesy, and dissapointing.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful

6

MichaelRamseyJun 4, 2004

While all-in-all was a decent conclusion to the series. I agree with Mr. Phipps in his (Jackson's) not adding the "Scouring of the Shire". There are moments in it which let us understand what it all was about, at least for the Hobbits. While all-in-all was a decent conclusion to the series. I agree with Mr. Phipps in his (Jackson's) not adding the "Scouring of the Shire". There are moments in it which let us understand what it all was about, at least for the Hobbits. And that wisdom does come from experience... not age. … Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

D.B.Feb 5, 2006

Boring, melodramatic, laughably cheesy at the end. And "The Days of our Lives" has more believable, authentic acting. When there are so many interesting things to watch, why spend (a ton of) your time watching this? It's proof that Boring, melodramatic, laughably cheesy at the end. And "The Days of our Lives" has more believable, authentic acting. When there are so many interesting things to watch, why spend (a ton of) your time watching this? It's proof that movie critics have become so jaded that they are only impressed by size, glitz, and visual grandeur ("Oooh! Look at the big mountain!). That's the only way I can explain the outpouring of praise for this mediocre, boring, self-absorbed, self-indulgent piece of second rate epic tripe. My precious? Not in the least.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

4

StefanMar 5, 2006

A magnificent fantasy film, but I can't bear to watch it. Jackson invents unnecessary scenes which makes it apparent that he hasn't understood the original story, or deemed it more important to cater for his own visual and A magnificent fantasy film, but I can't bear to watch it. Jackson invents unnecessary scenes which makes it apparent that he hasn't understood the original story, or deemed it more important to cater for his own visual and dramaturgical interests. This is ok when it comes to King Kong, but Tolkien's book has a much different, and imho superior quality of atmosphere: more wise, more witty and more... magnificent.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

9

StarrettBJan 2, 2007

The acting by many of the characters was excellent and the cinematography was unparalleled. Congrats to Peter Jackson for accomplishing such an amazing epic in film especially with such a difficult series of books to convert to screen. While The acting by many of the characters was excellent and the cinematography was unparalleled. Congrats to Peter Jackson for accomplishing such an amazing epic in film especially with such a difficult series of books to convert to screen. While I would not call it the greatest movie of all time, I definitely would say that it holds its own against a vast majority of films. Oh and to Taco M...if you took the time to view any of the documentaries on the film, it would become evident to you that they read all three of Tolkien's books (including the Silmarrion) multiple times and in great detail in order to get as much as they could out of the stories. To include every minute detail and story within the books would result in at least three 6 hour movies (which no one would watch). The trilogy was an adaptation of the books, not a visual representation of them.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

JacksonG.Jan 4, 2007

Although it does have some gems, overall I'm glad that the trilogy is FINALLY OVER!!! I felt all three of them were incomparably boring.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

7

JasonJ.May 30, 2007

I love this series. The entire story is well organized and keeps the three long movies feeling short. Upon watching all three (again) recently, I have determined that the 3rd is the weakest. Maybe it was director fatigue. Maybe it was the I love this series. The entire story is well organized and keeps the three long movies feeling short. Upon watching all three (again) recently, I have determined that the 3rd is the weakest. Maybe it was director fatigue. Maybe it was the fact that all of the genius was spent. The ending of this movie was the disaster that pulled it down from a 9.5 to a 7. Too much crying and too many endings. It was like watching the extra Napoleon Dynamite scene (the wedding). It must be man's instinct to try and ruin something that was otherwise perfect.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

6

JackSJul 26, 2007

My wife and step daughters loved the books and the films, but I could never get into them. Granted, the acting, cinematography and attention to detail are there, but in my opinion, this movie drags on and on. My family was riveted and loved My wife and step daughters loved the books and the films, but I could never get into them. Granted, the acting, cinematography and attention to detail are there, but in my opinion, this movie drags on and on. My family was riveted and loved every second, but I was reaching for the No-Doze.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

AMJan 2, 2004

Obviously, this is a well-made, often thrilling, and gorgeous looking movie, but I must admit to a feeling of "is this it" afterwards. The battles were wonderfully shot, and aside from Eowyn, Theodan and Merry's contributions, entirely Obviously, this is a well-made, often thrilling, and gorgeous looking movie, but I must admit to a feeling of "is this it" afterwards. The battles were wonderfully shot, and aside from Eowyn, Theodan and Merry's contributions, entirely devoid of emotion. Denethor's character was muddled, to say the least. Orc deaths took precedence over the ringbearer himself. Something in this movie is distressingly off kilter, unbalanced. I realize it was an enormous task to translate such a literary work to such a visual medium, and applaud Jackson's zeal in making it work to some extent, but really: best motion picture of the year? Of all time? A perfect film, this is not.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

AnonymousMCJan 3, 2006

If "Fellowship" and "Towers" were considered epic filmmaking, "The Return of the King" is super-epic. The battles are bigger, the emotions are stronger, the scenery is grander. You don't want the story to be over quite yet, and JacksonIf "Fellowship" and "Towers" were considered epic filmmaking, "The Return of the King" is super-epic. The battles are bigger, the emotions are stronger, the scenery is grander. You don't want the story to be over quite yet, and Jackson does his best to stretch it out as long as he possibly can! It's a culmination right to follow the previous two films and worthy of the awards bestowed on it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

ChristopherJ.Mar 17, 2007

The trilogy is pretty good, but this one dragged. "I know how we can fend off evil!! With an army of ghosts!! Yeah!!" What a lame ending!

0 of 1 users found this helpful

4

MarionmMay 1, 2008

The music is the best ever for any relaxation therapy !!!! Its kinda like church MUSIC!!!!!! sadly most of these people think this movie is GREAT!!!! its aint trust me folks!!! It was boring and REALLY REALLLY CHEESY. It might have passed asThe music is the best ever for any relaxation therapy !!!! Its kinda like church MUSIC!!!!!! sadly most of these people think this movie is GREAT!!!! its aint trust me folks!!! It was boring and REALLY REALLLY CHEESY. It might have passed as a when-you-have-nothing-to-do FILM!!!! but ist just wayyyyyyyyy tooo long!!!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

9

sdMar 28, 2009

To everyone who rated this at 0 or 1(and used the word hoopla)I physically shudder to think of the movies you rate highly.White chicks springs to mind.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

ButtahBiscuitDec 12, 2003

Amazing! I am the 41st reviewer of a movie that has 5 more days to be released! This is almost like Minority Report - we find you guilty of being about to see this movie and rate it with a 9. Remarkable - What'll they think of next?

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

LegionODorkSDec 19, 2003

This ZERO is for the pinheads rating this movie as 'BEST MOVIE EVER'. Yes, if you've seen only three movies in your life-- including the first two installments of this outrageously overrated series-- than yes, FANBOY, this isThis ZERO is for the pinheads rating this movie as 'BEST MOVIE EVER'. Yes, if you've seen only three movies in your life-- including the first two installments of this outrageously overrated series-- than yes, FANBOY, this is the best picture ever. If, on the other hand, you're over 3 years old, you may have seen... oh... I don't know... 200 better films, conservatively? Let me guess: George W. Bushole.. best President EVER?!? I thought so...… Expand

0 of 18 users found this helpful

5

DaveDec 21, 2003

I must say i'v read Rick's review, and although i don't agree, i was laughing my a** off. The moive did start to drag ALOT in the middle, and it seemed like everyone was kinda forcing there acting(script) parts. The effects I must say i'v read Rick's review, and although i don't agree, i was laughing my a** off. The moive did start to drag ALOT in the middle, and it seemed like everyone was kinda forcing there acting(script) parts. The effects however, is the most superior to date than any other movie.Absolutely demolish?s matrix special effects. I did however understand what Rick meant by "nerds". I think it was geared to more of the hardcore fans. With such length, thats why it kinda fell in the middle and picked itself back up again. I don't think it was that bad though, in consideration of the whole film, and its length. I know it's based on a book but i lowered my score based on the ending as well, it could have been better. I do feel that Ebert's review was dead on. And Tyler G., you don't have to read all the books to tell if this movie was good or not. It's like looking at Matrix Revolution(without seeing the pervious installments) and saying Matrix Revolution was a perfect movie. Its not, it was horrible. The return of the king, stands by ITSELF as not such a great movie. And no i didn't compare it to Hogwarts and what Middle-Earth stands for, and bla bla bla, cuz im not that much of a diehard fan.I just thought the movie really disappointing.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

0

KevinM.Jun 23, 2004

That was an awesome movie, you can really attach to the charactors, you feel that you know them. The battles are great and also the acting. Overall, one of the best movies I have seen in my life.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

0

PaulShoomanJun 23, 2004

Peter Jackson seems to specialize in making uncalled-for remakes of moribund 1950s movie genres that aren't exactly aching for callbacks. House of Ghouls was a fitfully funny, successfully stupid pothead gloss on the Dracula moviePeter Jackson seems to specialize in making uncalled-for remakes of moribund 1950s movie genres that aren't exactly aching for callbacks. House of Ghouls was a fitfully funny, successfully stupid pothead gloss on the Dracula movie series. This one, however, fails on just about every level. Not only have Wes Craven, the Wachowski brothers and Ed Wood (of all people!) pretty much squeezed every drop of blood out of the Fantasy concept, but ROTK commits the unforgivable sin of movie trilogy endings: it eventually becomes the exact same thing it's a sequel of! To add insult to injury, the brilliant 1950s spoof Cheaper By the Dozen, which almost completely reinvents the movie-parody genre and was released at virtually the same time, makes this mess look even more like a total failure than it already is. I guess Petey J can go for lambada movies as his next target.
… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful

0

PeterJacksonJun 23, 2004

Hello, Peter Jackson here. Just wanted to apologize for this terrible piece of crap I made. Looking back, I realize how stupid it was of me to make this movie. First of all, I really need to learn how to direct and make real characters in myHello, Peter Jackson here. Just wanted to apologize for this terrible piece of crap I made. Looking back, I realize how stupid it was of me to make this movie. First of all, I really need to learn how to direct and make real characters in my movies. Sorry about that. I guess if you want to see one of my good movies, see House of Ghouls. I musta had an extra bottle o scotch when we started making this movie. Again, I apologize, and I hope you ignore my crappy movies in the future. I'm only out for the money, you silly lorries.
Love,
Peter Jackson… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful

9

patrickd.Nov 12, 2005

Beautiful camerawork, breathtaking shots, majestic action and a perfect fantasy enviroment make up this conclusion. It's really long though, and I still believe it's overrated.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

JamesMNov 19, 2005

What rubbish! After first and second chapters of magnificence and beauty, Peter Jackson inexplicably ruins the epic trilogy with a boring and overlong third installment.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

6

NikkoC.May 19, 2006

Crying, weeping, applauding - the movie had come to an end.......and finally, I could leave. Jackson's inability to 'kill his babies' in the diting process means an exercise in ticking boxes and presents, because of the Crying, weeping, applauding - the movie had come to an end.......and finally, I could leave. Jackson's inability to 'kill his babies' in the diting process means an exercise in ticking boxes and presents, because of the world's inherent fantasticness and ymtholigical landscape, characters one simply cannot care for becuase they are clearly total bollocks in any real sense. So if the premise is ridiculous, yet is subsequently treated seriously and with the most mundane of affection (clearly caring for 1d characters who he does not give enough to for us to do the same), the movie is undited nd almost seven hours long.......why wouldn't anyone, as I did, stand and applaud in sheer relief at its conclusion (about an hour late)....I mean shit! Boot camp was finally over....and this kiwi (but no dim one) could finally fly home. A movie review is not about judging a film's vision or the child-like sinserity of its maker...NO!...It is about the merits of the film as they sit objectively and whether it stacks up in all the genral areas and any we didn't see coming...this does neither.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

NinjaMafiaDec 23, 2003

Ah, RoTK, the last film in the LoTR trilogy. So how does it stack up, well let us find out. Okay, the storyline everyone should have down by now, Frodo goes to Mt. Doom Gandalf and everyone else try to hold back an army of orcs and trolls Ah, RoTK, the last film in the LoTR trilogy. So how does it stack up, well let us find out. Okay, the storyline everyone should have down by now, Frodo goes to Mt. Doom Gandalf and everyone else try to hold back an army of orcs and trolls and the like. I never read the book Return of the King, so I thought I would be a bit lost here and there, and I was. While I didn't get lost in the story, a few of the characters had me bewildered. Like who the hell was that one girl by the boat at the end and who told Frodo to get up when he dreamt (?) he was in a field? I know this is targeted for people who have read the books, but I think a good book to movie transfer shouldn't have you questioning about who or what people are. Also, they didn't have enough of Arwen in this movie, hell, they didn't have enough of Arwen in all three movies. She was only at the begining and end of this one, hardly fitting for her. Also, during the big battle sequence beteween the orcs/trols and Gandalf and the elves and humans and such, there was one part of it towards the end that had me thinking, wow that is really cheap and extremely un-dramatic, I mean, they couldn't lose because of this. There also wasn't a lot that happened in this movie. It was three and a half hours long yet it seemed that movies that are and hour and a half long (not going to name any to protect myself, and those movies) seemed to have more done within them than this. Despite all these complaints, the movie does deliver on quite a few levels. The acting was great to begin with. The action was also really good. A few things here and there didn't make me like the action as much as I could have, but still, it was good. The movie's plot was also kind of good. But it feels that you need to have to watch all three movies in a row to get it, or you need to have just read the book. The entertainment was also pretty high. I found myself almost laughing at a few parts of the movie (It takes alot to actually make me laugh). I think alot of people will like this movie. Hell, a lot of people do like this movie. I just don't think that it should get as much praise as everyone is giving to it, maybe some of it, but I know someone out there has got to think that this is just an average movie. Also, to adress a few people here, King.... Mountain, first off, people like this movie a hell of alot more than Gothica, open your eyes, also, it is called fantasy, not role play. To everyone else out there that praises Peter Jackson, I have a little thing to tell you. Have you seen any other Peter Jackson movies? If not than stop crediting him as the best director of all time( although I have seen some of his other movies, like Dead Alive, and still find them extremely entertaining). Also, Carlos H., every emotion possible is not just Thrills, happiness, and sadness. There still fear and regret and a ton more. Also, I didn't feel alot of sadness when I watched this movie, maybe thats just me though. Anyway, I hope everyone goes and sees this movie, it is just a movie to be seen, even if you hate it . b… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

FastpooseDec 30, 2011

Great, masterful work, would have given it 10 but Elijah Wood, Liv Tyler and the awful Cate Blanchett have way too much cheese in their acting, other than that, an epic adventure, and one of the best fantasy movies of our time. Funny though,Great, masterful work, would have given it 10 but Elijah Wood, Liv Tyler and the awful Cate Blanchett have way too much cheese in their acting, other than that, an epic adventure, and one of the best fantasy movies of our time. Funny though, George RR Martins 'Game of Thrones', is a far better book and far better on screen...… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

gm101Mar 29, 2011

In a way, this was better than the last two movies, but the reason I'm giving it the same score as the last two was because Christopher Lee's scene was deleted (which is such a big shame, considering he is one of the best actors ever).

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

Andys_ReviewsOct 13, 2012

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The book could very easily have been made into two films; there is such a lot that happens and so many twists in the plot that it might have benefitted if that were the case. But we… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

arbohcik1393Dec 26, 2010

You guys who gave this a 0 are trolling, right? I've read the books, watched the films, both are amazing, really can't see how people are giving this 0s and 1s.. that's about all.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

ZegilgameshDec 28, 2012

Though the ending is padded a bit, it is still another brilliant Lord of the Rings adaptation,and will forever stand as an example of quality big-budget cinema with impeccable acting and a satisfying climax.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

FrostAidenMar 17, 2012

To be honest, "The Return of the King", is truly a spectacular movie, however I can see why people dislike it, due to it's fantasy based story-line, and it's slight differences between the novels. However, it is still truly a stunning movie,To be honest, "The Return of the King", is truly a spectacular movie, however I can see why people dislike it, due to it's fantasy based story-line, and it's slight differences between the novels. However, it is still truly a stunning movie, both visually and mentally. It does an amazing job in capturing the sense of both dread and hope, particularly in the siege of Minas Tirith. However I have to admit that it's epilogue is almost 20 minutes too long, and slightly "cheesy". But the main kill for this movie not being a 10, is the placing of the climax, the movie flows almost perfectly throughout the first half of the movie, then a truly amazing scene takes place, and due to the length of the scene and the emotions flowing through the audience, one really does feel that "this is it... that's the climax, the best part of the whole film", however it isn't and the rest of the hour was just looked at as a epilogue, which makes it boringly dull afterwards, also the true climax is nowhere close to the power shown in the previously mentioned scene. And this kills the movie's epilogue for me.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Riflenator1234Sep 12, 2012

While this movie is enjoyable, it leaves out the ending of the book. This was one of my favorite parts of the book and ruins the movie for me. The movie is also overrated, It really isn't special.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

MonsieurEamesJul 12, 2012

A terrific ending to one of cinema's greatest movie series'. A nearly flawless installment. The battles are terrific and done in superb detail that only Jackson can do. My only complaint is I wish there was a little more talking and a littleA terrific ending to one of cinema's greatest movie series'. A nearly flawless installment. The battles are terrific and done in superb detail that only Jackson can do. My only complaint is I wish there was a little more talking and a little less fighting, but really, being an action freak, that statement is hardly anything at all.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

quesadillaOct 11, 2012

This is easily one of the greatest movies of all time. Stays true to the book, and in some areas, outdoes it. The speech at the black gate is also one of the most epic, chilling scenes in history. Considering I watched the extended edition,This is easily one of the greatest movies of all time. Stays true to the book, and in some areas, outdoes it. The speech at the black gate is also one of the most epic, chilling scenes in history. Considering I watched the extended edition, which fills in gaps and adds humor and story not seen in theaters, the movie was well over 3 hours. I had to watch in 2 sittings to get through it. I am glad the producers went this route instead of cutting hours and story off the final cut. If you are a fan of the books, or just like epic fight scenes and a good story (recommended you watch the first two or have at least read the books beforehand though) this a movie that is well worth the time you will out into watching it.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Compi24Jan 4, 2013

Rounding off a trilogy on the right note is no easy task, but Peter Jackson and co. pull it off with ease in this third and final installment of their adaptation of the classic Tolkien tale - it's bursting with marvelous set pieces,Rounding off a trilogy on the right note is no easy task, but Peter Jackson and co. pull it off with ease in this third and final installment of their adaptation of the classic Tolkien tale - it's bursting with marvelous set pieces, heart-wrenchingly emotional drama, and that same plethora of charming characters that rightfully bring it all home.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

WhiteTalpaDec 27, 2012

An epic ending to one of the best trilogy ever made. Some of the best battles I've seen in a film. LOTR The Return of the King is a real masterpiece.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

mds03Apr 15, 2013

What's good about this final film in the franchise is that it's action scenes, script, direction, and the ending all work fine. The last hour of it was especially entertaining and intense. Like the first film in the franchise, almostWhat's good about this final film in the franchise is that it's action scenes, script, direction, and the ending all work fine. The last hour of it was especially entertaining and intense. Like the first film in the franchise, almost everything works except for the runtime and probably something else. I mean come on, a 201 minute runtime. It feels like I could run a marathon of 100 miles and the movie would still have 30 minutes left when I got back home!!!!!!!!!! The other problem is that the camera shifts far too many times and far too fast between Frodo's group and The Fellowship while the movie is going. The camera will show the Fellowship fighting off the bad guys for 30 minutes and then shift to Frodo, Sam, and Gollum's point of view for barely 5 minutes!!!!!!!!!!!! It's still good but it has almost the same exact problems as the first two.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

relaxzz73Jan 1, 2017

The best movie I've ever seen. And maybe it is the best of the all future.
This movie won 11 Academy Awards. My Enlish is not good, I can't read any more things.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

cinemabonApr 8, 2018

Best Picture film by Peter Jackson is one of the few in cinema history to win every category in which it was nominated. Jackson, along with his wife, bring JRR Tolkien to life with a rich display of images all supported by Howard Shore'sBest Picture film by Peter Jackson is one of the few in cinema history to win every category in which it was nominated. Jackson, along with his wife, bring JRR Tolkien to life with a rich display of images all supported by Howard Shore's brilliant score.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MethosTRAug 16, 2014

Arguably one of the greatest fantasy movies of all time. Peter Jackson conducted a master-stroke of cinema that managed to captivate an entire generation. With this movie and its prequels, Tolkien's magnum opus has become the definitiveArguably one of the greatest fantasy movies of all time. Peter Jackson conducted a master-stroke of cinema that managed to captivate an entire generation. With this movie and its prequels, Tolkien's magnum opus has become the definitive fantasy legendarium that others aspire to.

But.

Return of the King is not THE perfect movie. There are some flaws in it, albeit minor, that detract from the experience and may dismay hardcore LOTR fans.

None of these flaws lie in the production or direction in and of itself, but rather some continuity issues and some questionable additions and omission of some material from the books.

However, only one flaw is really worth mentioning, and that is the inclusion of the Army of the Dead in the Battle of Pelennor. This move conveys the notion that PJ sought to sway people who either didn't care about LOTR or fantasy in general, or simply to add cinematic flair and "awesomeness" to the movie.

An understandable move, for sure. But this scene may leave some hardcore fans dissatisfied with the experience. However, I myself wasn't put off by the scene itself, as it served the purpose of ending the battle and ushering in the conclusion of the movie. Again, understandable, considering the fact that an entire book had to have been "crammed" into a ~210 minute-long movie.

In general though, I was immensely satisfied with the movie and its prequels. Return of the King will be immortalized as one of the greatest movies of all time, and I doubt that this feat will be replicated in the future.

I give The Return of the King a score of 10, despite the minor flaws I mentioned above. They were not enough to detract from my wonderful experience with the movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

WheelzFourReelzDec 29, 2014

The trilogy ends with the best film, in my opinion. Everything about this movie is done perfectly, like the other previous films, but this movie adds in even more heart, even more action, and even more character development. All thoseThe trilogy ends with the best film, in my opinion. Everything about this movie is done perfectly, like the other previous films, but this movie adds in even more heart, even more action, and even more character development. All those aspects, combined with an ending that made me cry, definitely makes this a shining example of what films should strive to accomplish; an epic in every sense of the word. This is my favorite movie of all time.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

andreekaMar 6, 2015

the best film i've ever seen in entire my life. stunning effect and great visual, the music score from howard shore is fu*cking beautiful especiallt concerning hobbits.

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

ZawMineMay 11, 2015

Undeniably one of the best movies in the cinema history. Such an amazing fantasy film. Return of the King is my favourite in the LOTR trilogy. I think most people's favourite is this one. All in all, Return of the King is awesome.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

PanchogulAug 21, 2020

El Retorno del Rey confirma una sola cosa: La Trilogía de El Señor de los Anillos es la mejor trilogía de todos los tiempos, el conjunto completo es la perfección absoluta, pero esta tercera entrega es una obra maestra de otro mundo, es loEl Retorno del Rey confirma una sola cosa: La Trilogía de El Señor de los Anillos es la mejor trilogía de todos los tiempos, el conjunto completo es la perfección absoluta, pero esta tercera entrega es una obra maestra de otro mundo, es lo que Avengers Endgame siempre quiso ser y nunca pudo ser, una película de extrema calidad y auténticamente ÉPICA bien construida, personajes bien entregados a la magnitud de los acontecimientos acompañados de una bellísima banda sonora y un apartado técnico y actoral de proporciones bestiales.

Mi corazón explota de emoción cada vez que veo estas obras maestras.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

drone41Feb 9, 2018

Absolutely the best and the most interesting part of Tolkin's trilogy. One of the greatest movies ever.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MarvelJoeJan 15, 2019

If a movie makes you feel excited and emotional, the filmmakers did a good job. This is one of a hell of a masterpiece. MUST DEFINELY WATCH THIS MOVIE! That's all I have to say.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

HeroicAge616Oct 26, 2021

Largely dropping any pretense of being an epic character-driven yarn, Return of the King stays enjoyable as an action movie, if you don't think about what could have been.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

NandiJul 16, 2022

Amazing in every aspect, the amount of dedication and love this project had is astonishing