Rogue Pictures | Release Date: March 13, 2009
6.1
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 122 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
57
Mixed:
40
Negative:
25
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
JayHAug 13, 2009
Far more graphic than was necessary, but it's a compelling story and the acting is better than average. The pacing is relentlessly quick. Very suspenseful, good score. It is unlikely to bore the viewer.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
TaylorASep 6, 2009
I think the story line was great. But, the way they went about the whole thing was wrong. It started off slow and the rape scene was just horrible. Couldn't they have made it obvious she was being raped without being so graphic about I think the story line was great. But, the way they went about the whole thing was wrong. It started off slow and the rape scene was just horrible. Couldn't they have made it obvious she was being raped without being so graphic about it. I do have to say I got more into it after Mari showed up on the porch though. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
RyanSAug 18, 2009
I guess this film was supposed to be shocking. It wasn't. It was another uninspired Hollywood remake of an old horror movie. It's so maddeningly bland, so predictable, that watching it was almost a chore.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
moviegrabbagJun 12, 2011
This movie was kind of out of left field to me. As somebody who never saw the original I was excepting this to be like "The Strangers" with Liv Tyler. This movie was nothing like that though. This movie is very in your face with a lot ofThis movie was kind of out of left field to me. As somebody who never saw the original I was excepting this to be like "The Strangers" with Liv Tyler. This movie was nothing like that though. This movie is very in your face with a lot of horrible imagery. Everything from a girl being stabbed in the stomach to an outright rape. The movie does a great job of building the characters and the acting is solid with the exception of Paige (Martha McIsaac) and Sadie (Riki Lindhome). The thing that actually bothered me the most was the very last scene. The move had a very solid ending and it fades to black only to come back on a microwave and the villain. I'm not here to spoil it to you but it was one of the only useless moments that was only in the movie to pad running time and add gore. Overall this movie is pretty solid and well worth a watch. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
dev92Aug 25, 2012
This film surprised me in the fact that I wasn't bored by it. Still it wasn't the best thriller/horror remake I have ever seen but it is no where near the bottom either. The tension built through the film really well.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
JorchkingJan 2, 2019
Una película con una trama interesante sobre 2 chicas que son secuestradas en el bosque y deberán pedir ayuda a sus parientes más cercanos donde cobrarán venganza.
La actuación es muy buena, tanto de la protagonista como de los padres. Las
Una película con una trama interesante sobre 2 chicas que son secuestradas en el bosque y deberán pedir ayuda a sus parientes más cercanos donde cobrarán venganza.
La actuación es muy buena, tanto de la protagonista como de los padres. Las escenas de acción están muy bien logradas (como la parte de secuestro y violación en el bosque, mismo con la venganza). El guión está bien y nos mantendrá enganchado durante toda la película.
Calificación: 6. Aprobado.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
juliankennedy23Nov 16, 2014
Last House on the Left: 5 out of 10: Close but no cigar. Honestly anyone who remembers 1972’s shocking version of the Virgin Spring had to know this remake would pull back the reigns. It would be like a remake of “I Spit on your Grave”...Last House on the Left: 5 out of 10: Close but no cigar. Honestly anyone who remembers 1972’s shocking version of the Virgin Spring had to know this remake would pull back the reigns. It would be like a remake of “I Spit on your Grave”... just not likely in these conservative and commercial times. Well at least they did not make it PG-13.

They screw up they remake early with two changes. The bad guys are bad guys from the start. There is no connection with the audience. No sense that they are travelling down a path as well; they do not connect with the audience as the hippies of the first film did. There is no sense that they are exploring there boundaries or challenging themselves. They start fully formed as black hats.

The second mistake is moving the story out of a regular middle class neighborhood and into a millionaires’ nature retreat. There is something shocking about violence among the shag carpeting and wood paneling of suburbia (The original movie was from 1972 after all) that is lost with the large Architectural Digest house perfectly clean and decorated. (Though with the filmiest wooden furniture this side of a thirties Western).

The rape is much less graphic than the original and the sense of sadism and intimacy of the first film is lost. On the plus side, Tony Goldwyn and Monica Potter give great performances as the parents and the revenge scenes are not completely without a sense of fun.

If this film was called something else, I might have gone easier on it. As a Last House on the Left film, it is a glossy shadow of its predecessor.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
inaneswineNov 14, 2017
After a failed attempt at sitting through the original version - due to boredom, abysmal acting and overwhelming 70s camp - I approached this one with fairly low hopes. And for the first half, it seemed to confirm my fears. The script seemedAfter a failed attempt at sitting through the original version - due to boredom, abysmal acting and overwhelming 70s camp - I approached this one with fairly low hopes. And for the first half, it seemed to confirm my fears. The script seemed shoddy and pointless, and the characters were so unrealistic it began to annoy me. But just as I was about to turn this one off too, Mari shows up at the house. And things take an eventful and scary turn. The second half of the film is well paced, well acted and very tense. On the whole, I'm glad I watched it - it's certainly a better class of horror remake. The cinematography is atmospheric, John Murphy's soundtrack is very good and only occasionally intrusive, and it knocks the original film out of the water. But with all that said, Aaron Paul's promising career may stand more of a chance if he quietly leaves this one off his showreel. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
FilipeNetoJun 29, 2018
This movie is a remake of another movie, older and forgotten. The story revolves around three sadistic criminals who kill mercilessly and who decide to hide in a quiet middle-aged couple's vacation home, hours after they raped and tried toThis movie is a remake of another movie, older and forgotten. The story revolves around three sadistic criminals who kill mercilessly and who decide to hide in a quiet middle-aged couple's vacation home, hours after they raped and tried to kill their daughter. The story is really good and the environment is tense from start to finish. The rape scene is one of the hardest to watch I've ever seen. However, from the middle, the film loses some interest because it becomes predictable and similar to other horror films like "You're Next", for example. What saves the film, at that moment, is the sympathy that we have already felt for the couple and their daughter. This connection allows the public's attention not to be scattered because we still want to see the bad guys punished. Garret Dillahunt is incredible in the role of the gang boss, managing to make his character an unbearably disgusting presence. Riki Lindhome and Aaron Paul were more restrained but no less competent. Sara Paxton was reasonable, but her role gradually becomes secondary, giving way to Tony Goldwyn and Monica Potter, a good duo who really did a great job. In the end, what we have is a good remake that, while not surprising, is able to entertain and cause some shivers. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
akshatmahajanJul 3, 2021
The Last House on the Left (2009) remake is better than original. The execution better than rhe original and the plot was also improved. Movie was 25 minutes longer than the original and they used this time to show the story which wasn'tThe Last House on the Left (2009) remake is better than original. The execution better than rhe original and the plot was also improved. Movie was 25 minutes longer than the original and they used this time to show the story which wasn't shown in original. I think they took correct decision to include these scenes but 25 minutes could have been shortened to 10 minutes. Also, the torture scenes felt rushed.

The performances by the girls was not upto the mark but the roles of villains were performed better. I also loved that they changed the ending instead of nonsense ending original had.

Overall, this remake was improvement over original but don't think this one was excellent. It was average movie which you should watch instead of the original one.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews