The Jungle Book

8

smodcastApr 28, 2016

New yet, familiar characterizations, Funny and heart warming. This doesn't disappoint. The first in a dozen live action remakes from Disney that actually delivers the goods.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Antgiog1202Apr 27, 2016

The Jungle Book, directed by Jon Favreau and written by Justin Marks was an outstanding film with it's compelling storyline to it's marvelous use of CGI. This is probably one of the best looking films I've ever seen -- below The recent PlanetThe Jungle Book, directed by Jon Favreau and written by Justin Marks was an outstanding film with it's compelling storyline to it's marvelous use of CGI. This is probably one of the best looking films I've ever seen -- below The recent Planet of the Aps films and the Star Wars films. I read recently that they've used the entire set in one location and that no actaully forests were used during the procces of development. This -- to me -- is brilliant because it'll show inspiring directors that you don't always have to travel much to find that perfect location for that perfect scene. Speaking of directing, Jon Favreau made a humungous turn-around from Iron Man 2 and Cowboys & Aliens. He basically did the impossible as he is a CGI maniac with his films.

The only problem I have with this film is the lead actor: Neel Sethi. His acting was kind-of stale; which is understandable since this is his first time on the job. He didn't seem to know what he was doing since the entire duration of the movie was a big bowl of CGI.

I do recommend you guys watching The Jungle Book. Maybe take your kids on a nice sunny day, they'll defiantly enjoy it and so will you!

Rating: 8/10

A+ = 10
A = 9
A- = 8
B+ = 7
B = 6
B- = 5
C+ = 4
C = 3
C- = 2.5
D+ = 2
D = 1.5
D- = 1
F = 0… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

ElectroNickApr 26, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. After hearing all of the critical praise of the remake to Disney's animated Classic I decided to check it out for myself. My personal conclusion is that it is a mixed bag. This film will keep your children entertained and it will keep you interested in a visual sense. However if you are looking for a film that has a solid script and a film with a clear focus on what it wants to be you will be disappointed. As I said before the visuals are really stunning with an excellent use of CGI for the animals. The film looks gorgeous as the jungle really feels alive and the animals look as realistic as they have ever been. The wolves and Bagheera in particular look realistic and it feels that you can reach out and touch him. The color palate also pops up with bright and beautiful colors. The score is also grand with reworking of classic songs. The part of the soundtrack which really stood out was the instrumental rendition of "Trust In Me" when Mogli was discovering his past through Kaa's hypnosis. The actors give a valiant attempt to bring life to the characters with great performances from Christopher Walken, Ben Kinglsey, Bill Murray, and Idris Elba. The film is unfortunate held back by a script which lacks any focus. It is unsure if it wants to be an adaption of the original book or a remake of the animated film. It tries to combine elements from both works but it creates a jumbled script. For example when Mogli meets Kaa she helps Mogli get her memories back and gives him sage advise like her book counter book. However in the next scene though she tries to eat him like in the animated film. Another example was that Shere Khan kills the eldest wolf and holds them hostage like a thug but than tries to act suave like in the original cartoon making it seem like they are two completely different characters enrolled into one. Another main problem is the lack of connection to the characters because the script moves from set piece to set piece without any time to let the characters develop their relationships. As a final note this film will keep children entertained and will fulfill your needs if your looking to purely be immersed in the jungle and will keep your kids entertained but it is unfocused. The original animated film may not have been a faithful adaptation but it had a clear focus on what it wanted to be. Aside from its score and impressive visuals it is really nothing more than an average family movie. It is fine from any other company but from Disney I expected better.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

10

sgy0003Apr 25, 2016

Absolutely loved it.

The movie's aesthetic and setting borrows from the original book, while the story follows somewhat close to the original animated movie. Now, it has its own share of dark moments, but it is not enough to be reallyAbsolutely loved it.

The movie's aesthetic and setting borrows from the original book, while the story follows somewhat close to the original animated movie. Now, it has its own share of dark moments, but it is not enough to be really called "scary". If you have children, it should be a safe and great film for me.

The VA was superb. Everyone sounded the part. Scarlett Johanson as Kaa was especially great IMO. But the true star of the movie is the main star, Mowgli. Keep in mind the kid was talking to the thin air when they were shooting the film. He did amazing job.

The music and the sounds were on par as well. Bare Necessities, I want to be like you, and Trust in me all does really good job of taking the older audiences on a nostalgic trip, while they add their own variations to stay relevant to the younger audiences.

10/10. It's a must see… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

7

BananaGamer12Apr 25, 2016

O filme é lindo e tem uma diversão garantida para quem assistiu as versões anteriores,porém falha em muitos aspectos como dublagem,elenco e direção,mas no resto é um bom filme

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

chad326Apr 24, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As someone who loved the original jungle book as a kid, this was definitely a dissapointment for me, and not just because they took a very different tone than the original. While they made a valiant attempt, and there was clearly a good chunk of effort put into the movie, it definitely fell flat for me.
First off the format that they chose is extremely hard, because literally the whole movie is 1 kid on a green screen for the whole movie. think about that for a moment, the entire movie rests on the shoulders of Neel Sethi's acting, who while i think he did a very good job, he's still just a kid and that really really limits the quality of the movie, because no matter how good of an actor, no matter how much practice Neel has had, he's still just a 12 year old kid, he's not a professional actor. Now this worked just fine in the original jungle book because it was a kids movie, and everyone knew it was a kids movie. The new jungle book really tried to be a serious movie that adults would enjoy as well, and that's where i think its biggest flaw is.
This brings me to my next point which is the "realism" that they chose to implore. Now having life like animals that talk has always been a very rocky slope, there a lots of examples where it can go horribly wrong and not very many where it goes right. From the very opening scene that shows mowglie running through the forest, until the end of the movie you could pretty easily tell that even a lot of his movements
were cgi, which also took away from the experience for me, but my biggest qualm with the realism is that they tried so hard to make the movie realistic and then continued to allow very large plot holes. Mowglie is a human whos lived with animals all his life, and so because he's a human with no education of any kind he's a boy genius? without even pausing to think, he comes up with very intricate ways to engineer situations to his advantage, within the movie they just call it "his tricks" but i mean seriously, he suspends himself from a cliff with a vine as a rope, anchored by animals with a system of how the animals should move in order to put him in the right position to use a saw that he made to cut down chunks of honey, all without getting stung, but when he does he just completely brushes it off like it never happened, all of which he thought about for literally 30 seconds, less even, it took him 30 seconds to engineer and begin making this very intricate plan to get honey for baloo, and this is just the tip of the ice berg. throughout the movie the fact that he was such a boy genius and able to completely ignore pain (he was stung by at least 20 bees but still managed to get the honey, and then miraculously healed in 1 minute, and towards the end he gets a huge gash across his chest from shere khan (the antagonist/ tiger) says ow and then continues on as if nothing happened.
this was probably the biggest turn off for me, they seemed to try so hard to make the movie believable, but its a story about talking animals and a boy who's apparently the next genius of an era, and has the pain tolerance of 2 grown men combined. the original movie was just a fun kids movie that didn't try to be real, and i think thats the biggest distinction between the two.
I did think that the casting was exceptional, but i am a little biased against christopher walken, i think that the character of king louie could have been portrayed differently, and played a little better.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

7

SpangleApr 24, 2016

The Jungle Book is everything it ever should have been. A truly magical experience, The Jungle Book features stunning visuals, a great score, and fantastic special effects. This classic tale of a boy living in the jungle has been told beforeThe Jungle Book is everything it ever should have been. A truly magical experience, The Jungle Book features stunning visuals, a great score, and fantastic special effects. This classic tale of a boy living in the jungle has been told before obviously and its certainly not the most original plot nowadays to boot, but this does not prevent the film from still sweeping you up in its truly heartwarming tale. The Jungle Book bears its soul for all to see and the result is a truly touching and thoroughly emotional film. I honestly had to fight back tears repeatedly while watching, a feat that does not happen much. Yet, when director Jon Favreau is in control, this seems to be a regular occurrence. He honestly may be a master at emotional manipulation and touching your heart through his films, as evidenced here, as well as in Elf and Chef. Though this one is a big budget film, it feels wholly intimate. Ben Kingsley, Bill Murray, and Idris Elba, are all phenomenal here as voice actors. Neel Sethi is about as good as you can expect of a child actor. He never soars above expectations, but never disappoints either. Overall, The Jungle Book is about as good as a film of this type can be. It can be a little cardboard cutout at times, but it really touches your heart and entertains throughout thanks to great writing, direction, and voice acting.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

beezballApr 24, 2016

It took itself too seriously in the beginning and end, the middle was wonderful. Also, the changed ending, I very much disliked it. I thought it was unnecessary and probably politically motivated, as were the humans suck (typical) themes.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

wanraoApr 24, 2016

Disney give us an another incredible live-action movie! The Jungle Book has a decent script and history and brings classical elements from the animation. The photography with hot shades is great and makes the movie looks so natural. TheDisney give us an another incredible live-action movie! The Jungle Book has a decent script and history and brings classical elements from the animation. The photography with hot shades is great and makes the movie looks so natural. The animals do not look artificial and express emotion like humans. The performances are great, specially Lupita Nyong'o who express so strong maternity in her speech. The only problem in The Jungle Book is the musical elements that are inserted in a forced way, and makes the movie lose its propose of being a serious or a musical movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

ToFewViewsApr 24, 2016

The Jungle Book is a odd movie, It's trying to bring back a animated movie from most people's childhood but this time it's much more violent and has a lot less singing. With the amount of violent/action scenes in this movie it doesn't feelThe Jungle Book is a odd movie, It's trying to bring back a animated movie from most people's childhood but this time it's much more violent and has a lot less singing. With the amount of violent/action scenes in this movie it doesn't feel much like the original other then a few odd parts in the movie. One thing that was done right was CGI, They did a great job at keeping it seem realistic when working with humans and CGI. They also kept some human charm to the main characters to even that they are animals. The voice acting is also done well, Bill Murray, Christopher Walken and Ben Kingsley are just a few of the people who worked on this film. All together I'm confused by what Jungle Book wants to be. Dose it want to bring are childhood movies into a realm of violent action films? or still try to bring back what made it so special when we were younger.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

horrorliefhebApr 24, 2016

-The Jungle Book is a 2016 American fantasy adventure film directed by Jon Favreau, written by Justin Marks and produced by Walt Disney Pictures. Based on Rudyard Kipling's eponymous collective works, the film is a live-action/CGI remake of-The Jungle Book is a 2016 American fantasy adventure film directed by Jon Favreau, written by Justin Marks and produced by Walt Disney Pictures. Based on Rudyard Kipling's eponymous collective works, the film is a live-action/CGI remake of Walt Disney's 1967 animated film of the same name.

-The Jungle Book stars and introduces Neel Sethi as Mowgli, an orphaned human boy who, guided by his animal guardians, sets out on a journey of self-discovery while evading the threatening Shere Khan. The film also features the voices of Bill Murray, Ben Kingsley, Idris Elba, Lupita Nyong'o, Scarlett Johansson, Giancarlo Esposito and Christopher Walken.

-Favreau, Marks, and producer Brigham Taylor developed the film's story as a balance between Disney's animated adaptation and Kipling's original works, adapting elements from both into the film. Principal photography commenced in 2014, with filming taking place entirely in Los Angeles. The film required extensive use of computer-generated imagery to portray the animals and settings. The Jungle Book was released in North America in Disney Digital 3D, RealD 3D, IMAX 3D, D-Box, as well as premium large formats, on April 15, 2016.

--Critical response:

-The Jungle Book received critical acclaim, with praise aimed at its visual effects, Debney's musical score, the performances of the voice cast, Favreau's direction, and its faithfulness to both the animated film and original Kipling works. On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 94%, based on 204 reviews, with an average rating of 7.8/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "As lovely to behold as it is engrossing to watch, The Jungle Book is the remake that actually improves upon its predecessors – all while setting a new standard for CGI." On Metacritic, the film has a score of 77 out of 100, based on 48 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews". Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale. 97% of the audience gave the film an A or a B. It got A's from both the under and over 25 crowd and A+ among those under 18 years of age, and also for the over-50 audience.

--Sequel:

-Following the film's early financial and critical success, the studio has begun work on a sequel film. Favreau is reported to return as director and Neel Sethi is reported to reprise his role of Mowgli, while screenwriter Justin Marks is also in negotiations to return.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

thethoughthereApr 23, 2016

A film almost overwhelmingly deserving of praise, The Jungle Book is, by quite a large margin, the best live-action adaptation of any animated story ever put to film. With impeccable CGI renderings of not only gorgeous landscapes but also aA film almost overwhelmingly deserving of praise, The Jungle Book is, by quite a large margin, the best live-action adaptation of any animated story ever put to film. With impeccable CGI renderings of not only gorgeous landscapes but also a wide array of different animals, near-perfect voice acting from the entire cast, a surprisingly believable and likable child star at the helm, balanced dialogue, a de-emphasis on the musical numbers of the previous versions and above all, a more thematically-structured and well-conceived plot than its predecessors, The Jungle Book hits every note and Jon Favreau has delivered a film which will set a new standard for not only CGI technicians but also live-action adaptations of anything which was initially animated. I look forward to purchasing the Blu-Ray upon release, and I may be too impatient to wait that long for a second viewing. I predict a number of technical awards going to this film during the Oscars next year.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

lucbevibrasilApr 23, 2016

Spectacular visual effects, amazing performances of the voice cast (and Sethi, of course), good direction of Favreau and magic fidelity to the animated film. It's a wonderful movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

mrmonsterApr 23, 2016

Yet another absolutely perfect Disney movie. The story was perfect, the voice acting (especially from Christopher Walken, Scarlett Johannson and Idris Elba) was perfect, the CGI effects were perfect, the music was good (not great but good),Yet another absolutely perfect Disney movie. The story was perfect, the voice acting (especially from Christopher Walken, Scarlett Johannson and Idris Elba) was perfect, the CGI effects were perfect, the music was good (not great but good), it was an all around fantastic movie. I had huge expectations, and I was still impressed at just how good it was. Definitely the best of all Disney's live action remakes so far.
Andy Serkhis is really going to have to step up his game if he wants Jungle Book: Origins to top this.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

Silverscreen91Apr 22, 2016

I was never a big fan of the original Jungle Book. I found it very boring, with only the songs being anything memorable. That said, Disney’s live action remake of their classic movie was, at the very least, a wonderfully entertaining film.I was never a big fan of the original Jungle Book. I found it very boring, with only the songs being anything memorable. That said, Disney’s live action remake of their classic movie was, at the very least, a wonderfully entertaining film.

As you probably guessed, it follows the story from the animated film almost to the letter. There are several changes, a few things watered down, completely left out (no hippie vultures here), or their purpose in the film altered. It’s more engaging to watch, but the pacing seems a little off. Some points are glanced over and others are focused on for some time, though honestly that’s a minor nitpick. I will say that the action in the movie really made it much more interesting. In the original, there was hardly any action at all. If you took out the King Louie bit and climax, it was a very mellow film. So having the additional action scenes really helped.

I was worried that the celebrity voice acting would be distracting. Thankfully, I was wrong…for the most part. the majority of characters voiced by celebrities fit just fine. I especially loved Ben Kingsley’s Bagheera and Scarlet Johansson’s Kaa. In the case of Bill Murray as Baloo, however, it was bizarrely distracting. It’s ironic because I thought Murray would be the best casting choice, but each time he spoke it seemed out of place for some reason. I think it’s mostly because he spoke more like a city dwelling con artist than he did a jungle dwelling animal. A comparison made even more obvious if you see this film shortly after seeing the character Nick Wilde in Zootopia. That said, the issue may be more with the writing than the actor himself.

I will say that one of the biggest improvements from the original film is Neel Sethi’s performance as Mowgli. In the original, I always saw Mowgli as being a bland, typical child character. He was just an observer of the jungle, his personality defined by the situation that he was in. Mowgli in this movie was a much more defined character. He’s a man-cub with a surprisingly intellectual and curious mind that wants nothing more than to continue living in the jungle that he’s been raised in, preferably with the family that helped him grow. Now it can be argued that Mowgli’s character didn’t really grow or change much throughout the movie, but I think his character didn’t need it since several of the other characters have their own developments instead.

The other major concern I had with this movie was the fact that it’s live action and nearly 100% of the animals in it are CGI. I was seriously worried that they would look completely and utterly fake. Once again, I was gratefully mistaken. The CGI on the animals is fantastic. It’s not perfect and I would have preferred a few more practical effects to make them more realistic, but at the very least I can totally believe that they’re in the same scene as Sethi is, which is more than can be said for films like Jurassic World. All that said, however, there is absolutely no purpose in seeing this movie in 3D. The film doesn’t benefit from it at all. It’s a shame because, with most of it done in CGI, you’d think they would take advantage of it. But no, there is literally one, just ONE brief scene where the 3D works for the film, and it’s just a stupid jump scare. Don’t bother paying the extra bucks on the glasses.

The biggest pitfall that this movie has is the songs, or lack thereof. Don’t get me wrong, they do appear, but they’re handled in a very unpolished fashion. Bear Necessities, while getting a whole scene to it and sung well, is boiled down to just Mowgli and Baloo chilling while singing it. It’s kind of boring. Wanna be Like You was just odd in its presentation in the film, especially when you hear the fantastic rendition that they play over the end credits. Trust in Me and the Elephant March songs don’t appear in the movie at all. The first is just referenced with a line and only sung over the end credits while the second is completely removed (thought, to be fair, it was removed for a very understandable reason once you see the film). I hope we get these songs properly in an extended edition, because they do sound good.

The story is good though it has a slight pacing problem, helped a lot through the additional action sequences. Almost all of the characters fit perfectly in the film, with the main character being a really great improvement on the original. The CGI is just amazing. It’s an overall great film that I totally recommend seeing it in theaters…in 2D.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

Rutger-KikkertApr 22, 2016

This movie is great. All the acting and voice acting, the writing, the storytelling, the CGI etc.
New comer Neel Sethi does a great job, considering this is his first movie and that he had to interact with CGI animals and that he had to actThis movie is great. All the acting and voice acting, the writing, the storytelling, the CGI etc.
New comer Neel Sethi does a great job, considering this is his first movie and that he had to interact with CGI animals and that he had to act on only sets and no real locations.
The only down sights are that the sequence with Kaa the Snake could have been much more. and I also was a bit disappointed with the lack of screen time Idris Elba's character Shere Khan had, even though his character was a very intimidating villain.
In conclusion a very entertaining, beautifully looking flick that is really worth watching.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

homer4presidentApr 21, 2016

The animals are the ones that steal the show, the animals looked authentic and real! Mogli's acting seemed a little forced, but I can understand if you're the only human character working with CGI animals.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

3

Nobilis1984Apr 21, 2016

To understand why I do not like the movie you have to know that I was born in the 80s and thus know the original. It was even more beautiful and lovingly gezeichneteUnterhaltung. It had a special charm and loving characters.
This one looksTo understand why I do not like the movie you have to know that I was born in the 80s and thus know the original. It was even more beautiful and lovingly gezeichneteUnterhaltung. It had a special charm and loving characters.
This one looks really great and is also displayed realistically. But Bagira and Co are a disappointment.
Since the special charm missing I mentioned. Everything what makes the Disney classics so famous is not found. The humanity of animals is no longer there. Bagira one imagines the original as a buddy by your side before. Here he is just only an animal for which one does not feel any great sympathy.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

7

TVJerryApr 21, 2016

Even though this looks like a live action film, it's completely animated, with the exception of the real boy who plays Mowgli (Neel Sethi). He's been raised by a pack of wolves, but must leave his home when they're threatened by the evilEven though this looks like a live action film, it's completely animated, with the exception of the real boy who plays Mowgli (Neel Sethi). He's been raised by a pack of wolves, but must leave his home when they're threatened by the evil tiger Shere Khan. On his journey, he meets some new animals (most enjoyably Bill Murray as Baloo) and has some perilous adventures. They've even tossed in 3 songs from the original film (plus a fun 2nd version of "Bare Necessities" by Dr. John during the credits). As the final frame of the credits states, "This film was shot in downtown Los Angeles," but the lovely landscapes and slew of creatures is eye-catching and beautifully designed. The action is well-staged and the story comes together with lively energy. Still, it lacks that extra punch that would have made it wondrous and emotionally satisfying (and Sethi's performance could have been a bit more charming).… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

horizonbtsApr 21, 2016

OK with all the buzz I had to check it out for myself, I am a 59 year old male. Yes probably a little old to go see these kind of movies, but I am not too old to remember what Jungle Book was all about. It's so amazing what they can do theseOK with all the buzz I had to check it out for myself, I am a 59 year old male. Yes probably a little old to go see these kind of movies, but I am not too old to remember what Jungle Book was all about. It's so amazing what they can do these days with a movie and make you totally believe that it is actually taking place. No doubt Walt Disney would have been very proud to have his name on this one!! Don't miss out just because of your age or your pride, go see it I promise you won't be disappointed as Jungle Book comes to life!!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

TornadoCreatorApr 20, 2016

I went into this not sure what to expect but found it to be a pleasant surprise. This re-imagining of the classic story, while actually closer to the book, manages to set a tone quickly and keep everything fun and lively all the way through.I went into this not sure what to expect but found it to be a pleasant surprise. This re-imagining of the classic story, while actually closer to the book, manages to set a tone quickly and keep everything fun and lively all the way through. The child actor playing Mowgli was exceptional and really held this film together, while certain nods and small bits where attention to detail was particularly high, made me feel shockingly engrossed. There where some unfortunate concessions. In order to make this kid friendly the film glosses over anything that would be realistically gruesome, but the jungle still feels threatening at least. The casting of Scarlet Johansson as the snake Kaa was an interesting choice, and I can see why the song "Trust in me" was relegated to playing over the credits as it would have slowed the pace of the film and left younger children bored. Hopefully a directors cut will put in a scene where the song is placed into the film itself. The slightly selfish nature of Baloo works really well, and makes him oddly more endearing and funny.

Ultimately this is a great family film and one I recommend whole-heartedly. It was great fun and, while the CGI can be a little distracting at times, it's rarely a big problem. Even adults should enjoy this.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

Compi24Apr 20, 2016

Featuring quite possibly the most groundbreaking use of CGI to date, "The Jungle Book" is as much a testament to Jon Favreau's superior directorial prowess as it is a suitable interpretation of the Rudyard Kipling tale we've all come to knowFeaturing quite possibly the most groundbreaking use of CGI to date, "The Jungle Book" is as much a testament to Jon Favreau's superior directorial prowess as it is a suitable interpretation of the Rudyard Kipling tale we've all come to know and love. Thanks in no small part to the brilliant imagery, invigorating set pieces, and devoted voice acting work from every cast member, the resulting product is easily Disney's finest live action remake to date.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

CrocsxApr 20, 2016

I wasn't hoping for much, but this film is very very good.

The CGI are amazing, you will forget that everything is CGI after like 5 mins.

It fit for all ages, and will be perfect for every one that grew up with the cartoon version.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

terrynabetApr 20, 2016

I normally am not a fan of CGI, mainly because it can be overdone and rushed; however, this was done perfectly. The character that plays Mowglie did an outstanding job considering he is the only physical person on the set having to act aroundI normally am not a fan of CGI, mainly because it can be overdone and rushed; however, this was done perfectly. The character that plays Mowglie did an outstanding job considering he is the only physical person on the set having to act around imaginative characters and scenery. Acting, directing, cinematography and writing were all superb. If I were to have one criticism, it was the one song that was played in the movie. I won't say what it was but it just kind of out of place and felt a little off putting when I watched the movie. But that's a very small negative point that is overshadowed by an overall well done film. I will piggy back off my first sentence of this review, the CGI looks real.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

10

likethatgirlApr 19, 2016

Behold- a unique entry to the Disney classics. The best thing about it is that it does not try so hard. The Jungle Book swings between Kipling's darkness and Disney's hopes. A new breed of film-making is introduced from it, actually. ABehold- a unique entry to the Disney classics. The best thing about it is that it does not try so hard. The Jungle Book swings between Kipling's darkness and Disney's hopes. A new breed of film-making is introduced from it, actually. A ground-breaking art piece in the contemporary. Wonderful and engaging! Don't ever miss it..… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

7

RobBob99Apr 19, 2016

The Jungle Book is the most visually engrossing movie I've seen since Gravity. The voice cast including Bill Murray, Idris Elba, Ben Kingsley and Christopher Walken and many others are all outstanding additions to the film. That being said IThe Jungle Book is the most visually engrossing movie I've seen since Gravity. The voice cast including Bill Murray, Idris Elba, Ben Kingsley and Christopher Walken and many others are all outstanding additions to the film. That being said I do feel as if The Jungle Book is overrated. Neel Sethi is fine as Mowgli but there are a few awkward moments. The story to me wasn't that investing even though it stays true to the source material (which I appreciate), just to me, I wasn't completely into the whole story.It's without a doubt a good movie but not the great one everyone has been making it to be.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

SSH83Apr 19, 2016

CG is amazing. 7 star purely for the CG. If the CG wasn't so good, the acting, story and Music would take this to 2 star.

I liked the original "I want to be like you," this version is very... offensive to the ears. Like someone triedCG is amazing. 7 star purely for the CG. If the CG wasn't so good, the acting, story and Music would take this to 2 star.

I liked the original "I want to be like you," this version is very... offensive to the ears. Like someone tried too hard to mimic the old one but overacted. For story, they followed the skeleton of the original, but lost a lot of the charm and spirit of the original. The acting... well... just think anakin skywalker from phantom menance, but 100 times WORSE.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Iky009Apr 19, 2016

A classic nostalgic review 1967 Mowgli: The Wolf Boy or The Jungle Book, enchants for its visual beauty and so realistic visual effects that scare, something I have not seen since Life of Pi, and is sure to delight both children and adults,A classic nostalgic review 1967 Mowgli: The Wolf Boy or The Jungle Book, enchants for its visual beauty and so realistic visual effects that scare, something I have not seen since Life of Pi, and is sure to delight both children and adults, and can even thrill so beautiful it is.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

Chazd3Apr 18, 2016

This was without question the finest talking animal film I've ever seen. (I'm 66) Disclaimer, I saw it in 3D which I highly recommend. Visuals were jaw-dropping. They did a presentation in real world realism that has heretofore only beenThis was without question the finest talking animal film I've ever seen. (I'm 66) Disclaimer, I saw it in 3D which I highly recommend. Visuals were jaw-dropping. They did a presentation in real world realism that has heretofore only been possible in animation. A spectacular visual and a story filled with enough drama and moral themes for child and adult alike. This is an instant classic!… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

VipraApr 18, 2016

If you have read the original book and/or seen any earlier animations, you may safely stay away. You won't miss anything. You're better off doing anything else - may be just sleeping!
Unlike the irrelevant superhero animes, The Jungle BookIf you have read the original book and/or seen any earlier animations, you may safely stay away. You won't miss anything. You're better off doing anything else - may be just sleeping!
Unlike the irrelevant superhero animes, The Jungle Book could have a lot of educational value wrapped in excellent entertainment. But no, the makers of this movie decided to make a run-on-the-mill grand animation movie with some cliched humor and some unnecessary violence sprinkled at random.
The movie fails at many levels - from the glaring ones, like the incoherence of narration; to the counter-educative disproportionate animals, a Grizzly in an Avatar-esque rainforest hit by a drought, and an inexplicable temple structure. The "humane" innovations by Mowgli take the cake here, though!

I probably would not be so disappointed had they just created another stereotype animation, instead of creating a garbage out of a good kids' story.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

BikerjamesApr 18, 2016

First it was all the Princess movies. Now Disney is cashing in by making live action films of all their old animated classics. I enjoyed this remake, although I still think the original fully animated film has more charm. This is a darkerFirst it was all the Princess movies. Now Disney is cashing in by making live action films of all their old animated classics. I enjoyed this remake, although I still think the original fully animated film has more charm. This is a darker version, and in fact some of the sequences may be too much for young children. The boy who plays the lead, Neel Sethi, does a fine job and does not overact like so many children his age tends to do. The visuals are the true star of the picture. Animation keeps getting more and more detailed as time goes on which can create controversy. If it is too realistic looking, you don't even feel you're watching an animated film anymore. The voice-over work is also fine across the board. Overall a winner.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

NerdConsultantApr 18, 2016

The Jungle Book is an excellent remake, I actually think it’s superior to the 1967 film and while that may seem sacrilegious to some, I actually felt like this one was much more of an interesting film and it had a really good cast, amazingThe Jungle Book is an excellent remake, I actually think it’s superior to the 1967 film and while that may seem sacrilegious to some, I actually felt like this one was much more of an interesting film and it had a really good cast, amazing effects, a really good film score, some amazing performances, especially from Neel Sethi and a plot that I could really get in to. I don’t think this film will change anyones opinion on which version is the better, I still think a lot will still view the 1967 animated film as the iconic version, but I think anyone who has nostalgia for the previous one should check this out. It’s a really good one for the whole family. John Favreau makes this film with real heart and passion and while I think some people will be putt off by the changes most likely the different ending and slightly darker tone but I preferred this and can really recommend this film. Oh and stick around for the credits they’re fantastic.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

dharmaApr 18, 2016

The Jungle Book is a technological breakthrough, and another blockbuster for Disney. While the plot is predictable, the performances are great. You will believe that top notch actors such as Bill Murray, Ben Kingsley and Christopher WalkenThe Jungle Book is a technological breakthrough, and another blockbuster for Disney. While the plot is predictable, the performances are great. You will believe that top notch actors such as Bill Murray, Ben Kingsley and Christopher Walken can elicit believable performances as talking animals! See it on the big screen if you can.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

8

UrbanlistenerApr 17, 2016

Good family movie, a fairly well-made adaptation of the 1967 classic. Great performance by the young kid who had to act in front of green screens, great vocal work by the voice actors, except that Scarlett Johansson was kinda wasted, she wasGood family movie, a fairly well-made adaptation of the 1967 classic. Great performance by the young kid who had to act in front of green screens, great vocal work by the voice actors, except that Scarlett Johansson was kinda wasted, she was only there for one 2 minutes scene... The CGI is what makes this movie special, it is absolutely fantastic, exceptional work, there is some breathtaking scenes where you really wonder if it is real or not, the best CG I have ever seen. This movie is good for what it is, its worthy of the original and mostly tons of fun for all ages.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

morninstarApr 17, 2016

Well, that took you down nostalgia lane, didn't it? I am one of those people who grew up on the Jungle Book cartoons, although I watched them in Hindi(chaddi pehen ke phool khila hai :P), but all the great characters I remembered were allWell, that took you down nostalgia lane, didn't it? I am one of those people who grew up on the Jungle Book cartoons, although I watched them in Hindi(chaddi pehen ke phool khila hai :P), but all the great characters I remembered were all there. The best one though, Bill Murray as Baloo, hands down. He was snappy, he was funny, he was Baloo as I knew him. And I guess I don't have to say anything about Idris Elba as Shere Khan. You put the guy in anything, it becomes good automatically. Case in point, Pacific Rim(people who've watched it know what I'm talking about). The story was good, the execution was good, and Neel Sethi was amazing as Mowgli. Just keeping in mind that nothing around him was, well, actually there, he did a terrific job. To summarize, get off your butts and go watch the movie, in 3D, because that's where the fun lies. Enjoyment guaranteed!… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

10

aadityamudharApr 17, 2016

Disney’s live action adaptation of their animated classic, The Jungle Book, is a brilliant remake that gives a different take on the well known story. Watching The Jungle Book, it’s clear that Disney was trying to go for a more mature tone,Disney’s live action adaptation of their animated classic, The Jungle Book, is a brilliant remake that gives a different take on the well known story. Watching The Jungle Book, it’s clear that Disney was trying to go for a more mature tone, while still honoring their animated film. The Jungle Book is visually stunning, features brilliant voice acting, and updates the Disney classic with a modern twist. It should be noted how impressive this film is when considering that the entire film was shot in a studio in Los Angeles.
When you think of films that are groundbreaking in terms of special effects, you may think of Avatar or Star Wars, but possibly this movie may be one of the most groundbreaking. Considering that everything in this film, except the actor portraying Mowgli, is computer generated, and that the effects are seamless is extremely impressive. The Jungle Book may open a door for other films that originally seemed impossible may become possible. Most impressive is that the film looks gorgeous, regardless of the backstory, the film’s look is never dull, and always impressive.
The casting department deserves a ton of credit for this film as well, because the voice cast was perfect. Perhaps the best casting was Bill Murray as Baloo, who could literally have played this character in his sleep. However, that’s not to take away from the other voice cast members. Idris Elba was perfect as Shere Khan, Ben Kingsley nailed the stern Bagheera, Scarlett Johansson’s voice lent itself perfectly to Kaa the snake, and even Christopher Walken as King Louie fit perfectly. It’s not everyday that a cast comes together so well, but every voice cast member fit their role perfectly.
One major thing to note is that while the film honors the original film (which was quite silly) very well, the tone and look is quite different in the updated version. They still break into song occasionally, but the overall tone of the live action remake is darker overall, and more mature. That’s not to say that the film isn’t family friendly, it is, but the film isn’t as harmless as the original was, but the film isn’t afraid to scare the audience, and pulls no punches. This is simply because of the timing, in the 60’s animated films weren’t as dark as live action films today seem to have to be.
Overall The Jungle Book is an exciting, gorgeous, solidly crafted, and more mature entry to the growing list of Disney classic remakes. The film juggles the new audience’s expectations with the classic elements of the original beautifully, and what it creates is truly amazing. The film isn’t perfect, but is a great entry to the Disney live action canon. Above those who love Disney, and Disney classics, this is just in general a great retelling of this story, and should be seen in cinemas, where the visual effects are showcased at their best.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

NickLikesMoviesApr 17, 2016

A visual masterpiece with a completely engaging, energetic, and emotional story that hooked me. I am blown away with this movie. The voice acting, the characters, Neel Sethi, the action, the music, the cinematography, and most importantly,A visual masterpiece with a completely engaging, energetic, and emotional story that hooked me. I am blown away with this movie. The voice acting, the characters, Neel Sethi, the action, the music, the cinematography, and most importantly, the breathtaking visual effects. Everything in this movie works perfectly. I was worried that the songs would feel out of place and awkward, but I was wrong, they really work well. Jon Favreau has made something very special with "The Jungle Book", and I can't wait to see it again.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

fukutopiaApr 16, 2016

I'm a fan of all of the live-action adaptations Disney has been releasing of their animated classics, but Jon Favreau has left us with something much, much more in The Jungle Book. It's quite literally a perfect film in every way—production,I'm a fan of all of the live-action adaptations Disney has been releasing of their animated classics, but Jon Favreau has left us with something much, much more in The Jungle Book. It's quite literally a perfect film in every way—production, cinematography, acting, effects, writing…you name it. This may be the best Disney movie I've ever seen, and it's definitely one of the best films I've seen. You know the story, so I won't bore you there. This is an excellent adaptation by Justin Marks, making a serious film with talking, singing animals that doesn't come off as ridiculous. It just feels natural, like something you see in your everyday life. It's a story full of action, adventure, suspense, humor, and most importantly—heart. It's a story about man's place in the world, but also about how much our learned behavior can triumph our nature. It's a story about family, and how there are ties that bind much stronger than blood. Do yourself a favor & see this film. See it on a massive screen if you can. I look forward to seeing Jon Favreau on stage at The Academy Awards next year.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

tjman09Apr 16, 2016

Disney’s live action adaptation of their animated classic, The Jungle Book, is a brilliant remake that gives a different take on the well known story. Watching The Jungle Book, it’s clear that Disney was trying to go for a more mature tone,Disney’s live action adaptation of their animated classic, The Jungle Book, is a brilliant remake that gives a different take on the well known story. Watching The Jungle Book, it’s clear that Disney was trying to go for a more mature tone, while still honoring their animated film. The Jungle Book is visually stunning, features brilliant voice acting, and updates the Disney classic with a modern twist. It should be noted how impressive this film is when considering that the entire film was shot in a studio in Los Angeles.
When you think of films that are groundbreaking in terms of special effects, you may think of Avatar or Star Wars, but possibly this movie may be one of the most groundbreaking. Considering that everything in this film, except the actor portraying Mowgli, is computer generated, and that the effects are seamless is extremely impressive. The Jungle Book may open a door for other films that originally seemed impossible may become possible. Most impressive is that the film looks gorgeous, regardless of the backstory, the film’s look is never dull, and always impressive.
The casting department deserves a ton of credit for this film as well, because the voice cast was perfect. Perhaps the best casting was Bill Murray as Baloo, who could literally have played this character in his sleep. However, that’s not to take away from the other voice cast members. Idris Elba was perfect as Shere Khan, Ben Kingsley nailed the stern Bagheera, Scarlett Johansson’s voice lent itself perfectly to Kaa the snake, and even Christopher Walken as King Louie fit perfectly. It’s not everyday that a cast comes together so well, but every voice cast member fit their role perfectly.
One major thing to note is that while the film honors the original film (which was quite silly) very well, the tone and look is quite different in the updated version. They still break into song occasionally, but the overall tone of the live action remake is darker overall, and more mature. That’s not to say that the film isn’t family friendly, it is, but the film isn’t as harmless as the original was, but the film isn’t afraid to scare the audience, and pulls no punches. This is simply because of the timing, in the 60’s animated films weren’t as dark as live action films today seem to have to be.
Overall The Jungle Book is an exciting, gorgeous, solidly crafted, and more mature entry to the growing list of Disney classic remakes. The film juggles the new audience’s expectations with the classic elements of the original beautifully, and what it creates is truly amazing. The film isn’t perfect, but is a great entry to the Disney live action canon. Above those who love Disney, and Disney classics, this is just in general a great retelling of this story, and should be seen in theaters, where the visual effects are showcased at their best.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

SkullBallCorpApr 16, 2016

I went in fully expected to hate everything about this movie. I really did, I think part of me even WANTED to hate it.

So after seeing the trailer before pretty much every film for the last 5 or so months and being annoyed at having to seeI went in fully expected to hate everything about this movie. I really did, I think part of me even WANTED to hate it.

So after seeing the trailer before pretty much every film for the last 5 or so months and being annoyed at having to see it so much I was left unimpressed, the cg did not look great and I just did not care about the movie at all, also making Kaa a female now? that confused me.

However. I went to see the movie to form a valid opinion and was absolutely shocked and blown away. Firstly the trailer does not do the cgi justice it as absolutely breathtaking from the actual design to the mannerisms of the animals its just s believable. The only real tell that its not real animals is their mouth movements which are cleverly hidden for much of the movie.
The story is nothing special it tells the Kipling story decently well and minus a few characters being shown very little its all around very well done. Shere Khan is absolutely brilliant and menacing as they could possibly make him while keeping the age rating down. He is straight up bloodthirsty in this and the voice actor did a solid job, as did all the actors in this.
The tone is also great not straying too much into the serious side of things but not breaking out into song constantly either, they got it just right.

If I had to say anything negative, the actor playing Mowgli just wasn't that good in my opinion, he was decent enough but some of his reactions etc. were a little off to me and the kid cant sing, I don't know if they thought having him singing rather than dubbing another person would make it more believable or something but it really takes away from a potentially great scene.

Other than that the cast is great as I said and despite my rash judgement of the movie from the trailer and pre release stuff it turned out great. Far from a 10/10 film like some are claiming but a very worthy entry into the disney catalogue and a very solid reboot of a classic movie.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

VadertimeApr 16, 2016

Very well done CGI effects with Sher Khan at his most menacing in any version. Story moves along and scenery is spectacular. Another masterpiece from Jon Favreau. Good job.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

Can7onaLegendApr 16, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Jungle Book is amazing great features and great ending with believable Characters
WELL DONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

MrMovieBuffApr 16, 2016

Disney nails another live action remake yet again. This time, director Jon Favreau ('Elf' and 'Iron Man') decides to take on the story written by Rudyard Kipling, and remaking the original 1967 animated classic. It's also worth mentioningDisney nails another live action remake yet again. This time, director Jon Favreau ('Elf' and 'Iron Man') decides to take on the story written by Rudyard Kipling, and remaking the original 1967 animated classic. It's also worth mentioning that the 1967 animated Disney classic was also the last animated feature film produced by Walt Disney before his death in December 1966. I wouldn't be surprised if that boosted the attention of 'The Jungle Book' (1967) for film-goers everywhere.

The movie stars Ben Kingsley as Bagheera the Black Panther who found a little, abandoned boy named Mowgli (a very talented and young Neel Sethi) and decided to let a family of wolves raise him.

We see Bagheera raising and training the little Mowgli who still has a lot to learn, but with him being the only "man cub" within the jungle, that doesn't seem to pass the attention of the villainous Shere Khan (Idris Elba) who plans to kill the young boy. This is seen as an opportunity for Bagheera to take Mowgli to where the humans are, but Mowgli feels that he only belongs in the jungle, he comes across different animals along the way including; a group of marching Elephants, a scheming snake named Kaa (Scarlett Johansson), but he also meets the fan favorite, Baloo the Bear (Bill Murray).

One thing I will say about Murray's performance is that, while certainly great and never failing to provide the laughs, this vision of Baloo is very different to the one in the original animated classic. The animated one was more clumsy, and maybe a bit more simple minded. Murray's version seems to stretch down the more sarcastic side, if anything Bill Murray is basically playing Bill Murray the Bear. But he is likeable and yes, they do sing the iconic "Bear Necessities" which bring back childhood memories of hearing the 1967 animated classic for the first time.

What mainly surprised me the most about this movie was how it accelerates more towards the second half, I felt that the first half was more deliberately paced from time to time, but once the action starts, director Jon Favreau knows how to keep you entertained and invested throughout. The CGI in this film and the setting looks so fantastic, that I can really imagine Disney remaking 'The Lion King' (1994) into live action soon, and it would look something like this. Perhaps Jon Favreau should do the honors of directing that as well if he wouldn't mind.

Much like 'Cinderella' (2015), I cannot say that 'The Jungle Book' is a "must see" film, because you have seen it before. However, if you are looking to taking your children to the cinema, or if you just want to watch a full-blooded, animal adventure film that also is not afraid to be too sentimental, then this is the movie you're looking for. It is another "better than your average live-action remake".… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

TimW001Apr 15, 2016

The special effect were incredibly stunning. It was a beautiful movie. A fantastic adventure throughout, well paced action, great voice acting. Don't expect a remake of the original film. Have an open mind to a new story with new adventures.The special effect were incredibly stunning. It was a beautiful movie. A fantastic adventure throughout, well paced action, great voice acting. Don't expect a remake of the original film. Have an open mind to a new story with new adventures. A must see for movie go-ers.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

papadrew7Apr 15, 2016

Fantastic CGI and great 3d made this movie a technological marvel. The story was good too but the kid's acting took me out of it in some scenes, you could tell he was spouting verbalized lines in some scenes and others said you could tell heFantastic CGI and great 3d made this movie a technological marvel. The story was good too but the kid's acting took me out of it in some scenes, you could tell he was spouting verbalized lines in some scenes and others said you could tell he was acting in front of a green screen in some moments, BUT those scenes were few but it was a enough to warrant a two point reduction for an overall ranking of 8 out of 10. Personally, I don't know if its bias sense I grew up with the cartoon version but I liked the cartoon movie better. I also didn't like ( SPOILER ALERT) the kid doesn't go back to the man village so its like they are setting it up for a sequel instead of having a proper ending like the original.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

BrianMcCriticApr 15, 2016

While there aren't many differences from the animated classic, The Jungle Book is still an amazing accomplishment. Jon Favreau really puts a loving stamp on this beloved franchise. A-

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

10

TheSaintAllanApr 15, 2016

Awesome movie in 3D. This very thrilling and exciting fun, my kids love it and I love it too. Esta es la mejor película del año .. The jungle book3D es siempre divertido que no quería dejar la selva . Grrrr .. its 10/10. damn!

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

3

autcheApr 15, 2016

Total rubbish movie. Just as boring as the original; can't decide if it wants to be suspenseful, scary, comedy or musical. Don't worry, it does all things equally crappy - except for being boring; that it excelled at. Only redeemingTotal rubbish movie. Just as boring as the original; can't decide if it wants to be suspenseful, scary, comedy or musical. Don't worry, it does all things equally crappy - except for being boring; that it excelled at. Only redeeming quality was Bill Murray & Ben Kingsley. I swear, the kid has to be the son of the guy that played Anakin Skywalker in episode 1.. Most kids within a 10 foot radius were sleeping; heard more than a few times kids asking what time is it and is it almost over. Ugh...this was almost completely awful (sans Bill Murray & Ben Kingsley).… Expand

6 of 19 users found this helpful613

All this user's reviews

10

hyorennApr 15, 2016

This amazing was simply brilliant. Everything on it is just stunning, the CGI is the best thing on a movie, and the original songs were a great choice, I felt so nostalgic. Neel Sethi is great, and god, those character voices, flawless. ThisThis amazing was simply brilliant. Everything on it is just stunning, the CGI is the best thing on a movie, and the original songs were a great choice, I felt so nostalgic. Neel Sethi is great, and god, those character voices, flawless. This movie is a must see.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

10

moviechecker_21Apr 15, 2016

Here is a film that stands as a perfect rendition of the Jungle Book tale. It may not be as savvy as the 60's Disney animation or Kipling's material, but it is still considered a jaw-dropping classic on its own! Director, Favreau quietlyHere is a film that stands as a perfect rendition of the Jungle Book tale. It may not be as savvy as the 60's Disney animation or Kipling's material, but it is still considered a jaw-dropping classic on its own! Director, Favreau quietly blends the roaring environment of Kipling and the musicality of Disney. What it produces is a significant homeostasis against the overly inorganic digital Hollywood...

All praises to Favreau, Marks and the entire cast & crew!!!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

CineAutoctonoApr 15, 2016

"The Jungle Book" in the animated film has excited us a lot, and the version live-action , has left outstanding , special effects , characters and actors , it has been a very good movie with the signing of Disney and Jon Favreau director of"The Jungle Book" in the animated film has excited us a lot, and the version live-action , has left outstanding , special effects , characters and actors , it has been a very good movie with the signing of Disney and Jon Favreau director of "Iron Man".… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

6

dpaudiophileApr 15, 2016

amazed at how overrated this movie is... I mean its okay, but to give it 10/10 or 4 stars or anything close to that type of praise is insane.

This is a decent family movie, that should hold kids attentions and leave parents and youngeramazed at how overrated this movie is... I mean its okay, but to give it 10/10 or 4 stars or anything close to that type of praise is insane.

This is a decent family movie, that should hold kids attentions and leave parents and younger adults saying, "meh, that wasn't the worst thing in the world..."

For anyone who wants a good jungle book experience, go read the original book from the late 19th century. The 60s animated film is better than this 2016 version, and yet I would still say that the 60s film (barring the music) wasn't a masterpiece.… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

8

foxgroveApr 15, 2016

From its wonderful opening as the camera draws back from the Disney logo into the magical Los Angeles created Jungle, one has a positive feeling that the film is going to be something special. It doesn’t disappoint. In fact, it is actually aFrom its wonderful opening as the camera draws back from the Disney logo into the magical Los Angeles created Jungle, one has a positive feeling that the film is going to be something special. It doesn’t disappoint. In fact, it is actually a lot better film, story wise, than the mythically lauded 1967 animated cartoon version which is remembered more due to the strength of its musical numbers. Director Jon Favreau has done a fantastic job here in creating both a visual treat, keeping things fast paced and snappy in the set pieces, as well as honing in on all the major characters and keeping them in sharp focus. As the man cub Mowgli, Neel Sethi may not have to flex his acting muscles a great deal, but he at least keeps the character sentiment free and believable, which is in itself no mean achievement for a child actor. Voices for the animals are uncannily good especially those of Scarlett Johansson as the snake Kaa; Ben Kingsley as black panther Bagheera and Bill Murray as the celebrated Baloo. Best of all, though, is the Shere Khan of Idris Elba which is sheer magic.
As already mentioned the set pieces are fantastic, but in know way unbalance the rest of the film. Particularly impressive are the opening scenes of Mowgli training; the encounter with Kaa; Mowgli’s snatch by the monkeys; the mudslides and the climatic fire. All this is well served by CGI work that is just stunning and, if reports are to be believed, was all filmed in Hollywood’s concrete jungle far from anywhere ‘GREEN’. The cinematography is also beautiful and the 3D adds immeasurably on this occasion to the labyrinth of grass, trees and caves that make up the landscape. Be sure to stay for the end credits where the book itself is opened to add yet another inspirational touch to a very accomplished film that everyone can enjoy.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

10

johnmich_123Apr 15, 2016

From a Theatre artist’s perspective, music speaks for things at sort here...

The Jungle Book is a roaring success! With its CGI, actions and emotions all intact, there is nothing more I could ask from it. While others whine about howFrom a Theatre artist’s perspective, music speaks for things at sort here...

The Jungle Book is a roaring success! With its CGI, actions and emotions all intact, there is nothing more I could ask from it. While others whine about how absurd the injection of the two short musical pieces “Bare Necessities” and “I Wanna Be Like You” turned out in the film, I’d rather those were the evoking and gentle areas in the story; likely serving as asides for the emotionally-larger than life characters, Baloo and King Louie. In fact, I could even hum a tone for Shere Khan, the chilling and villainous Bengal Tiger who would do everything to eradicate Mowgli from the jungle.

Technically, music speaks for things at sort here- hatred, fear, love, frustrations, etc. We can’t entirely get away from it. And music, as a good old piece from musicals and other theatrical conventions, gets a fresh touch in this non-musical live-action adventure. Nonetheless, even with the wolf pack’s stoic pronunciation of the “Laws of the Jungle”, familiar notes are already rung in the audience’s hearts. But, had it been that they decided to turn this into a full musical, the film would definitely flop!

A well-presented story…
Eventually, for the first time since Avatar and Life of Pi, I enjoyed a seamlessly presented story. A story that stands on its own- the Jungle Book will always be remembered as it is. It may not be an utter classic, but it is enough a masterpiece to behold.
Ultimately, the Jungle Book goes beyond the Disney branding as a distinct collaboration of talents, Jon Favreau (Director), Justin Marks (for the characters’ well-paced dialogue), Ben Kingsley (voice of Bagheera), Bill Murray (voice of Baloo), Lupita Nyong’o (voice of Rakhsa), Scarlett Johansson (voice of Kaa), Idris Elba (voice of Shere Khan), Giancarlo Esposito (voice of Akela), debuting actor Neel Sethi (as Mowgli) and most of all, Rudyard Kipling for penning the classic story of the same title.

A wholesome package!
The Jungle Book has everything in it. It could be a political satire when it wants to, or a dark and grim propaganda. It may relieve the intense atmosphere off with a wry humor or tearful goodbye, a little bit of music and jovial monkey dancing as “verfremdungseffekt” and even perhaps a wild chorus of primitive growls that speak of more serious human agenda at hand.

Magnanimously, the Jungle Book reawakens the Lion King in its head-docking stampedes, resurrects the Passion of the Christ in Mowgli’s bearing of the weight for the greater good and stupendously animates Alice Walker’s Flowers in Mowgli’s rite of passage, symbolized by the Red Flower (Torch of Fire) he carries facing Shere Khan.

As mentioned earlier this film will roar at all ages since it is more than just a children’s action, adventure and entertainment tale. It will snarl at you, shaking and swinging you from the gut.
(One last note though: Don’t bother watching this if not in IMAX 3D. Otherwise, you might only end up cheating yourself of the spectacle.)… Expand

17 of 27 users found this helpful1710

All this user's reviews

9

wcrosherApr 15, 2016

With a darker tone, some of the best visual effects ever put on screen, and excellent voice work from the entire cast, The Jungle Book may actually improve on the 1967 original. It's funny, it's dramatic, sometimes it's even a little scary,With a darker tone, some of the best visual effects ever put on screen, and excellent voice work from the entire cast, The Jungle Book may actually improve on the 1967 original. It's funny, it's dramatic, sometimes it's even a little scary, but I think Favreau nailed it with this remake.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

7

PipeCApr 15, 2016

Favreau is the director of the umpteenth installment of the classic, this time with CGI special effects and an unusual vocal group.

Once more, the adventures of Mowgli in Indian jungles written by the young Rudyard Kipling are adapted byFavreau is the director of the umpteenth installment of the classic, this time with CGI special effects and an unusual vocal group.

Once more, the adventures of Mowgli in Indian jungles written by the young Rudyard Kipling are adapted by Disney under leadership of Favreau with a significantly attractive result. Together with visual quality, the vocal team is exceptional, these qualities can overshadow the theme background and development of the plot without purpose that accompanies the film during its progress. Summarizing the results of previous deliveries of the "The Jungle Book" around the world, it can be affirmed the support of audience with animals of the jungle, and it seems that this will not be the exception, because its previous evidence.

It's important to remember that this will not be a of the last times we listen to Kipling animals in the cinematography, since the production company Warner Bros will finance "Jungle Book: Origins" under the direction of Serkis and will be full of stars like Christian Bale, Cate Blanchett, Benedict Cumberbatch and Serkis himself as Baloo the bear ( itself delayed lately by the producer until 2018, apparently due to lack of time for proper development by the "ambition" of the project).

From the unforgettable opening scene of the old style of the castle of Disney where then the camera opens road between branches of fruitful trees of the jungle, start something that seems to be a chase human against animal, from that moment ,the realism (excellently illustrated 3D) pervades to perfection in an image that appears in pure manner. It is characteristic of Disney products resume in the form of remake or remastering classics already enshrined in the minds of adults. This strategy, beyond of reborn a memorable story, its second intention is to generate more money, due to which stimulate both the minds of adults and infants who are anxious to be dazzled with the film itself.

I think if the film was dumb would be spectacular, but the eccentric accompanied by Ben Kingsley or Scarlett Johansson is converted in which could be a more masterpiece for its financier. Mowgli (Neel Sethi) is an Indian boy who grew up in the jungle pleasures along with a pack of wolves. After an unexpected enemy re-appeared in animal life, the boy must embark on a sea of adventures and dangers, where he will find a spiteful tiger (I.Elba), a betray snake (Scarlett Johansson) or an unconditional "lazy" bear (Bill Murray) to discover his true family (he ultimately finds it).

Justin Marks' script tends to stumble and ago decline the continuous progress that the film presents. The dialogues are well executed, what it feels like to loose and inconsistent is the intent of the story, (spoiler) the guy is fired from the herd to go to where he truly belongs, but suddenly he's fighting with a tiger face to face for save the animals of the jungle, summarize the aspects of the plot are feel superfluous.

Disney never ceases to die one of its characteristic hallmarks, humor. Each film should have its load identifiable humor. After a slightly dark and dramatic tone in the opening, at the time that Baloo (Bill Murray) appears everything changes. Remarkable is the effort of each line written to the bear, where half of that dialogue has a load of humor. And speaking of Baloo, the homage made by Murray to recreate the 1967 song is really emotional.

Even more admirable is the delicate and precise design of the grotesquely beautiful animals, it is a disproportionate beauty, it's a beauty that stands out, it's a natural beauty, this is truly an animal beauty.

A tiger majestically managed and drawn that looks real. An extremely large snake, where each flake has a pinch real. A giant orangutan in a forgotten temple , accompanied by several monkeys shows the fear and respect for the King of the jungle. A Black Panther give fear or a bear that has no words of description. All this is highlighted and praised as with a magnifying glass with IMAX 3D.

All this cinematic perfection is weakened once more by an end of fairy tales. I think that for be a product of Disney must not have a happy ending or at least repetitive end of death of the villain in all of its films. But well, we all knew it was going to be, after all this is an adaptation

As well as his script and plot are increasingly more monotonous, the audio-visual quality of the project is very promising and exceeds limits of what has been done so far in this type of real action products.

Favreau and Pope produce a sumptuous and delicate visual experience that brings the best of CGI technology in a movie where the animals are the main feature. Interesting and realistic, Jon's work exceeds the requirements of the tape, but the tape itself is carried to the monotonous and incomprehensible. Again, Disney takes advantage of this move, while Warner Bros. and Andy Serkis are adjusting pants to try to overcome its main competitor. Warner'll let us dumbfounded. I'm sure.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

6

EpicLadySpongeApr 15, 2016

Did you guys hear the news? Disney's remaking their very own Jungle Book and changing things just for the best of their own decisions. Changing Kaa's gender surprises me because that's normally one of the things that's going to cause my scoreDid you guys hear the news? Disney's remaking their very own Jungle Book and changing things just for the best of their own decisions. Changing Kaa's gender surprises me because that's normally one of the things that's going to cause my score to go down. What's normally great about this is that it's better than the Rudyard Kipling version which, also, is a critical success. Not enjoyable for me but for you moviegoers and Jungle Book fans will enjoy this without any doubt. A friendly adventure seems stale enough and that's not even possible with Disney's family-friendly adventures.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

The Jungle Book

User Reviews