Netflix | Release Date: November 1, 2019
8.1
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1250 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,034
Mixed:
121
Negative:
95
Watch Now
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
JohnTYDec 26, 2019
DeNiro and Pacino are poorly cast here as Irish- and Anglo/German-Americans. And their respective ages doesn't work for me (regardless of the anti-aging tech).. Until the final act, which is very solid. It's like Scorcese's apology forDeNiro and Pacino are poorly cast here as Irish- and Anglo/German-Americans. And their respective ages doesn't work for me (regardless of the anti-aging tech).. Until the final act, which is very solid. It's like Scorcese's apology for glorifying mobsters all these years. But just like Frank seeking his daughters' apologies, I think it's all too little, too late. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
fanglemeisterDec 24, 2019
Only made it 29 minutes in, couldn’t take any more. The so-called talent phoned in their performances; these guys are all ready for retirement and it shows. Please spare us from more of the tough guy schtick.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
VitorlancastreDec 21, 2019
O filme-testamento no qual Scorsese imprimiu o seu cinema para contemplação das gerações futuras.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DerekReideDec 20, 2019
A well-done adaptation, done by the legendary Martin Scorsese. Although a very slow movie, it works so well to keep your attention all throughout the three and a half hours of storytelling that probably could never be achieved by any otherA well-done adaptation, done by the legendary Martin Scorsese. Although a very slow movie, it works so well to keep your attention all throughout the three and a half hours of storytelling that probably could never be achieved by any other director. I’ve heard a lot of people bash the movie for being too slow and too long, but I wasn’t in that category. For what it was, I thought this was a great pace for this type of film. Granted, this could be one of the last films that bring back the vibes of 70’s cinema, although this genre of the slower-paced, deeper toned film may never die down. Overall the acting was superb, the visuals, especially the de-aging, was great for the most part, and the story really took its time to tell itself, which I really appreciated. Definitely a one-time watch, though. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
zNeverSleepingDec 20, 2019
Esse talvez seja o filme mais impecável que já vi!

Tendo em vista que estamos falando da direção de Scorsese, é normal que as expectativas estivessem altas. Para quem gosta do gênero, ou ao menos aprecia o cinema como de fato uma arte, vai
Esse talvez seja o filme mais impecável que já vi!

Tendo em vista que estamos falando da direção de Scorsese, é normal que as expectativas estivessem altas. Para quem gosta do gênero, ou ao menos aprecia o cinema como de fato uma arte, vai se apaixonar pelo filme. O roteiro é incrivelmente rico, trazendo com detalhes a trajetória de Frank, do inicio ao fim, mostrando como oportunidades podem mudar as pessoas e até onde isso as leva - abordando como tema a Mafia. É simplesmente majestoso assistir algo que está sob controle. Aqui toda cena me parece meticulosamente pensada. Em momentos específicos, um plano mais aberto - dando um ponto de visão como se você estivesse lá - deixa tudo mais real e tenso. Os cortes são precisos, e quando há, não nos deixam perdidos. A trilha sonora é fenomenal. Além de casar muito bem com as cenas, ouvir musica boa sempre é ótimo para os ouvidos.

Quanto as atuações, Robert De Niro passa muito bem seus sentimentos sem dizer uma unica palavra. Al Pacino e Joe Pesci entregam o que é preciso para personagens tão marcantes.
E é claro, não posso deixar de mencionar alguns detalhes que impressionam, como: O movimento que é feito ao disparar as armas, o envelhecimento/rejuvenescimento surrealmente detalhado, a atuação dos figurantes - que muitas vezes é negligenciada, mas aqui teve devida atenção.

Enfim, se esse realmente foi o Ultimo filme de Scorsese... terminou o seu legado dando tudo de si e nos entregando sua arte de maneira magistral.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
gabrielrodvilDec 20, 2019
This is the worst film of 2019. The worst movie from Scorsese. The greatest waste of movie budget in the history of movies. This is the film that the characters from The Producers would've made if instead of Springtime for Hitler they decidedThis is the worst film of 2019. The worst movie from Scorsese. The greatest waste of movie budget in the history of movies. This is the film that the characters from The Producers would've made if instead of Springtime for Hitler they decided to make a film. That's how bad this movie is. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
KrakenOfPepsiDec 20, 2019
Everybody Loves Raymond and The CGI Godfather boys talk in a meeting and forget to have interesting personalities or character development for three and a half hours. Couldn't finish this one, I just couldn't do it. This felt like watchingEverybody Loves Raymond and The CGI Godfather boys talk in a meeting and forget to have interesting personalities or character development for three and a half hours. Couldn't finish this one, I just couldn't do it. This felt like watching one of those really boring history dramatisations in school. I've loved every Scorsese film I've seen, but this ain't it. It just ain't it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CinemaCrushDec 19, 2019
To start out, I'm going to have to agree with fellow user-reviewer shoulderoforion with most things. The thing I kept thinking most while watching Scorsese's new 10 lbs slowburner in a 5 lb wet bag, was 'how can the critics be giving thisTo start out, I'm going to have to agree with fellow user-reviewer shoulderoforion with most things. The thing I kept thinking most while watching Scorsese's new 10 lbs slowburner in a 5 lb wet bag, was 'how can the critics be giving this perfect scores. Did someone pay them off?' We've seen much better in the same style coming from Marty. And as shoulderoforion mentioned, the CGI young faces just aren't working for the film. Especially with De Niro. Al Pacino really shines in this. Giving a performance that I feel the rest of the cast just couldn't muster up. It's disjointed and longwinded and these are not adjectives I'd normally use for a Scorsese picture. This isn't going to be a popular sentence, but I really feel like this was a bit of a cheap shot. You don't really have any reason to care for most of the characters but Pesci & Pacino. Even Ray Romano gave a more "there" performance than Bobby. I would say watch it, and will even give it a 6 just for the big save by Pacino (but that's only a fraction of the film), and Joe Pesci's about-face to stoic, rather than his usual Goodfellas/Casino loud mouthing lovable weasel. The Irishman works on an odd recipe that is missing so much proverbial seasoning that you get from Goodfellas, Casino, the Departed and even Mean Streets despite it's coldness and preliminary nature in the grander picture of Marty films. Watch The Irishman. Definitely. Contort your, face puzzled at the blatant CGI. Take breaks out of boredom.... it's all worth it to see Pacino bring real sentiment to the table, and sell the role so well. That's the best thing I can say about Irishman. Pacino rocked the role of Hoffa. And the rest is all quite forgettable and at times cringeworthy with the de-aging CGI. 6 out of 10. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
3
shazbot_nzDec 18, 2019
This movie is unbelievably long and dull. Filled with pointless dialogue and it is clearly only getting great reviews because the big name actors are there. Their performances are solid, but just needed a better story. Perhaps more moreThis movie is unbelievably long and dull. Filled with pointless dialogue and it is clearly only getting great reviews because the big name actors are there. Their performances are solid, but just needed a better story. Perhaps more more fiction to grip the audience. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
RalfbergsDec 18, 2019
While I found this movie really good, I still think it could've been shorter plus was slow paced at times. But other than that GREAT actors and director and plot (even though people from those times say not truly depicted what happened, butWhile I found this movie really good, I still think it could've been shorter plus was slow paced at times. But other than that GREAT actors and director and plot (even though people from those times say not truly depicted what happened, but still great story) Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
Colig54Dec 17, 2019
Hard to watch, tried but couldn't finish several times, slow, weird sfx, cliched to the extreme. Totally boring and way too long.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
Gustavo2003Dec 16, 2019
O Irlandês é filme épico maravilhoso, cansativo, mas compreensível as três horas e meia, pois precisa desse tem tempo para desenvolver seu belíssimo roteiro ,e seus personagens profundos e cheios de questões sobre suas vidas. Melhor montagemO Irlandês é filme épico maravilhoso, cansativo, mas compreensível as três horas e meia, pois precisa desse tem tempo para desenvolver seu belíssimo roteiro ,e seus personagens profundos e cheios de questões sobre suas vidas. Melhor montagem do ano, roteiro profundo e belíssimo e direção de Scorsese perfeita! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
superfieldsDec 16, 2019
As this is Martin Scorsese doing a gangster film with the Italian heavy weights, i gotta say i was left wanting more. It lacked conviction and that Scorsese flair we have come to love from Goodfellas and Casino. But despite this Pacino andAs this is Martin Scorsese doing a gangster film with the Italian heavy weights, i gotta say i was left wanting more. It lacked conviction and that Scorsese flair we have come to love from Goodfellas and Casino. But despite this Pacino and Pesci were outstanding Deniro was a bit too aloof and didn’t really make it memorable. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
AbhijeetsahaNov 8, 2019
Perhaps the best film of the year and one of the best in the last 2 decades. One of the greatest crime films ever. The actors are phenomenal and Martin Scorsese is truly a genius. Deserves Oscars in almost every major category
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SammaDenDec 16, 2019
This movie is an absolute masterpiece, a must watch and a one of its kind. You can really feel the heart and soul put into this film both by the actors and the director.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
snickers01Dec 15, 2019
This movie was a disappointment on a every level. The acting was pretty good in parts, but the story was incredibly boring and the characters were completely unlikable. I know a three is harsh, but I feel I have to balance out the idiotsThis movie was a disappointment on a every level. The acting was pretty good in parts, but the story was incredibly boring and the characters were completely unlikable. I know a three is harsh, but I feel I have to balance out the idiots who are heaping praise on this crap just because. Compared to other Scorcese classics like Goodfellas, Wolf, Departed, Casino, Raging Bull, etc this is pure garbage. Hopefully he gets back on track with that new Decaprio feature he is prepping to shoot. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Arnold_ZiffelDec 15, 2019
TERRIBLY long.. and usually, tedious. A Who's Who of old Mafia actors; DeNiro an adenoidal caracature of himself.. repeating his lines, repeating his lines.. In the end, just a DEPRESSING excersize in Mafia bleakness; you don't care about ANYTERRIBLY long.. and usually, tedious. A Who's Who of old Mafia actors; DeNiro an adenoidal caracature of himself.. repeating his lines, repeating his lines.. In the end, just a DEPRESSING excersize in Mafia bleakness; you don't care about ANY of these people. There are moments of sudden, gory violence, all with no value. It's as if Scorcese is trying to give a Morality Lesson after all the "glamourous" Mob films of the past. The ending sucked...and I was just happy to get out of the theater. Nicely FILMED, though.. Wait to see it for free. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
Compi24Dec 14, 2019
Martin Scorsese frees himself from the bonds of typical studio parameters with "The Irishman," his first foray into alternative media distribution, and -- to be sure -- a solid one. I would, however, be lying if I said I wasn't a bit let downMartin Scorsese frees himself from the bonds of typical studio parameters with "The Irishman," his first foray into alternative media distribution, and -- to be sure -- a solid one. I would, however, be lying if I said I wasn't a bit let down by the certain elements in play here. Perhaps, it's the media-fuelled hype train powering this movie into the heights of my "most anticipated for the rest of the year" list, but a lot of the fuss made over the length, tech and certain cast members in this movie just didn't come across the way I worry they were supposed to. Was the de-aging impressive? I mean. Not really? It's nowhere near the level of distractingly bad that some have been saying it is, but, again, the impression it made in any direction was slight. Was the three-and-a-half hour runtime justified in the end? Startlingly, no. There are numerous moments, bits of dialogue, and even scenes that either repeat ideas we're already well-acquainted with or add nothing to the overall product as a whole. So why did I like this movie so much? Enter the final act, which tries (and mostly succeeds in) contextualizing the whole of what you've just watched, ultimately shaping the movie at large into one of the more mournful dirges on lost life, time and innocence that I've seen in quite some time. It really gave me pause to see Scorsese and Co. wax so pensively on the subject matter and characters at hand. It approached a plane of near-meta proportions and I was deeply taken by it all. I just wish we got there a tad quicker.

All in all, this is (I assume) a fitting end to Scorsese's reign as gangster movie maestro in chief. Sure, I've seen him do more with less in the subgenre, but it was nice to see the big man step up to the plate one last time.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
G_KeeperDec 14, 2019
Once great actors walk through their parts in a meandering tale with occasional gore and violence. A 90 minute film might have worked. This bloated 3.5 hour film does not.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
ThePeoplesVoiceDec 13, 2019
I loved it! Classical film making, a pure master class. Yes it's very lengthy, but you don't want movies like these to end.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
oneniggoDec 13, 2019
While having certain good dialogues the film is just too lengthy. I recommend you to first read some information about the topic like the Wikipedia article about Frank Sheeran because it will help you with watching the film. Maybe I'll add aWhile having certain good dialogues the film is just too lengthy. I recommend you to first read some information about the topic like the Wikipedia article about Frank Sheeran because it will help you with watching the film. Maybe I'll add a full review in the future. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Dariush2001Dec 13, 2019
Wonderful! What else can I say?
Robert and Al both were amazing! Name a better due than these two I'll wait...
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
gcatharinoDec 12, 2019
A slow-paced epic movie with superb acting by legendary actors (Pacino and Pesci, specially). Excelent directing, beautiful cinematography, solid screenplay and a Oscar-level editing. A instant classic and a modern masterpiece. But not forA slow-paced epic movie with superb acting by legendary actors (Pacino and Pesci, specially). Excelent directing, beautiful cinematography, solid screenplay and a Oscar-level editing. A instant classic and a modern masterpiece. But not for all tastes (aka. young people in era of Marvel empty but fast-paced movies). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TheRealSantaDec 12, 2019
This became one of my favorite films ever. I´d say that The Irishman is the best movies that Scorsese has ever made.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DMLYxCriticDec 12, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Slow-paced, brooding and violent. This is Scorsese, still at his best, delivering another gangster movie that will surely never be forgotten. The Irishman successfully blends in Scorsese's old and new style, albeit too long. Too long, that sometimes, the viewer loses track of the movie and drift away, and it certainly does not help that there are too many characters to remember. But it does well in the acting department, showing that Pesci, Pacino and de Niro can still deliver such powerful performances. Not their best, but certainly one of them. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TechhuisDec 12, 2019
Not a bad movie but too long and nowhere near Goodfellas or The Godfather so most people here who give a 9 or a 10 do not know a good movie
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
KeepzepackDec 9, 2019
The major reviewers were afraid to knock a movie so studded with stars, so they praised this movie when they should have panned it. Here's Scorsese longing for the Goodfella glory days and using the same cast to try to recapture it. This isThe major reviewers were afraid to knock a movie so studded with stars, so they praised this movie when they should have panned it. Here's Scorsese longing for the Goodfella glory days and using the same cast to try to recapture it. This is no Goodfellas. It's derivative. It's badly edited. It's boring. And worst of all, the movie keeps interrupting itself with captions under various characters that say things like: "Shot in the head in his driveway, July, 1980." These ridiculous captions take you out of the movie. It's 3 1/2 hours long, fercryingoutloud. It gets interesting in the 3rd hour, but it'll take a 2 1/2 hour slog to get you there. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
TaogodDec 11, 2019
This is the most over rated movie since Cameron's Titantic. It is impressive looking, but that's what $150 million movie should be. The overly repetitive dialogue - how many ways can Pacino/Hoffa tell us that he takes no s...? - made theThis is the most over rated movie since Cameron's Titantic. It is impressive looking, but that's what $150 million movie should be. The overly repetitive dialogue - how many ways can Pacino/Hoffa tell us that he takes no s...? - made the overly long movie boring. Sure, big name actors doing their final kick at the can together(?)is a draw, but another movie where a psychopath is the anti-hero is just one too many times. Don't worry if you miss it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
PrennerDec 11, 2019
Easily one of the greatest movies of all time, a true instant classic and exposes how poor cinema has become in recent years. Its a must watch.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
HTGamerDec 11, 2019
The Irishman is a great crime drama film directed by Martin Scorcese, starring Robert de Niro, Joe Pesci, Al Pacino and many others. It tells the story of a real mafia gangster (the eponymous Irishman) based on a book published some yearsThe Irishman is a great crime drama film directed by Martin Scorcese, starring Robert de Niro, Joe Pesci, Al Pacino and many others. It tells the story of a real mafia gangster (the eponymous Irishman) based on a book published some years ago.

The Irishman is a very well-made film, every actor is amazing. The plot is about the influence of organized crime in the post-WW2 era America. The story even touches on the human side of what it means to be a killer working for the mafia, how it affects the person and its family, and the aftermath of the truth getting out. And since this film is set in decades past, we see some amazing de-aging technology implemented to restore de Niro, Pesci and Pacino to their relative youth.

But while viewing The Irishman I couldn't escape the feeling that I was basically watching a modern version of The Godfather films or some other influential mafia movie. That's why I'm not awarding this awesome film a full 10/10 score. It just doesn't feel original.

Maybe if you haven't watched The Godfather you'll appreciate The Irishman more than I did. But I repeat, this is an awesome movie directed by a master director and starring great actors.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
TJH1Dec 10, 2019
Pervasive and extremely foul language gets in the way of the story. After the first 30 or 40 F bombs and MFers it gets a bit tiring. Story line is of interest although not factual but....the....movie....just....drags... on and on. Pesci isPervasive and extremely foul language gets in the way of the story. After the first 30 or 40 F bombs and MFers it gets a bit tiring. Story line is of interest although not factual but....the....movie....just....drags... on and on. Pesci is good, Pacino okay, DeNiro fair. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MarkHReviewsDec 9, 2019
In a recent “New York Times” op-ed piece, Martin Scorsese wrote that “cinema was about revelation — aesthetic, emotional and spiritual revelation. It was about characters — the complexity of people and their contradictory and sometimesIn a recent “New York Times” op-ed piece, Martin Scorsese wrote that “cinema was about revelation — aesthetic, emotional and spiritual revelation. It was about characters — the complexity of people and their contradictory and sometimes paradoxical natures, the way they can hurt one another and love one another and suddenly come face to face with themselves.” By Scorsese’s definition, “The Irishman” is a sober success.

The film centers on Frank Sheeran (Robert DeNiro), a low-level Philadelphia mobster. Early on, Sheehan catches the eye of mob boss Russell Bufalino (Joe Pesci) and becomes his enforcer and fixer. Eventually, he enters the orbit of Jimmy Hoffa (Al Pacino) and, under Hoffa’s patronage, rises through the ranks of the Teamsters Union.

One of the most interesting and powerful elements of “The Irishman” is its fascinating shift in tone. (With a running time of 3:29, there’s plenty of time for shifting tonality.) The first 2:30 offers consistent, relatively straightforward character development interspersed with Scorsese’s trademark penchant for brutal violence. After the climactic action scene, the final forty-five minutes of the film take on a gray, mournful, almost wistful tone that is all the more powerful because it stands in such stark contrast to the rest of the film. The ultimate power of this film resides in Sheeran’s reckoning, or lack of reckoning, with himself in the final act.

Clearly, the all-star cast is key to the success of “The Irishman.” The juxtaposition of acting styles is particularly gratifying. As Hoffa, Al Pacino chews the scenery in an occasionally over-the-top performance that is reminiscent of his early work in 1975’s “Dog Day Afternoon.” In stark contrast, Pesci offers a master class in understatement, as the viewer soon learns that the raise of an eyebrow or a small hand gesture can signify the difference between life and death. Harvey Keitel, Ray Romano, Anna Paquin and Bobby Cannavale lend their skills to slight roles along the way.

CGI is another star of the film. Seen most recently, and much more gratifyingly, in this year’s “Terminator: Dark Fate,” computer-driven de-aging of characters appears to be the next big thing. In this film, however, it’s clear that, unlike Norma Desmond, this technology is not yet ready for its close-up.

Critiquing films is, at its best, an exercise in subjectivity. It’s impossible not to be influenced by the previous body of work of the director, the writers and the key actors. It seems likely that this film, if associated with an unknown director and cast, would not have garnered the universal acclaim bestowed on “The Irishman.” This film, particularly the funereal tone of its final act, may rise to emotional heights not fully earned because viewers ultimately see “The Irishman” as an anticipatory elegy for a renowned director and a set of beloved actors who are much closer to the ends of their careers than to their beginnings.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
For3ver666135Dec 9, 2019
I understand that the movie is very long, but this movie portrays the time, so this time is needed for what the movie addresses, and Scorsese does it in a unique way that enchants me, this is one of the movies I liked best about my life.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
TachDec 9, 2019
Capolavoro senza tempo. La nuova opera di Scorsese mi ha tenuto incollato allo schermo per tutta la durata del film. Trama, scenografia, recitazione e doppiaggio semplicemente incredibili.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
3
JamesBurtonDec 9, 2019
The Irishman is a convoluted mess, no where near Scorsese's best work and nothing he hasn't done before. The plot leaves large gaps causing the audience to become confused, whereas the CGI on De Niro lands often in the uncanny valley.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
TratatatataDec 9, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The most scandalous film, barely watched, the feeling that I spent three hours in the house of the elderly, not because of the age of the heroes, but because of the burdensome plot. Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
10
Proteus7xDec 8, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Scorsese has outdone himself with this love letter epilogue called "The Irishman". It seems as if the older Scorsese gets, the more he manages to master art and nuance of film. This mafioso period piece with remnants of politics, betrayal and survival documents the life of Frank Sheeran, a WW2 veteran who had a close affiliation with the Bufalino crime family and Jimmy Hoffa.

Based on the non-fictional book "I Heard You Paint Houses" the film, clocking in at 3 hours and 30 mins, does a brilliant job at luring the viewers into the various characters and does not feel like a lengthy film at all. The film spans over 50 years from 1950 to 2000.

Robert De Niro who plays Frank Sheeran, the main character within the film, delivers an enthralling performance from start to finish. Joe Pesci, who has stayed away from the spotlight, delivers an astounding performance playing Russell "McGee" Bufalino who's demeanor is more calm, mellow but commanding as opposed to Goodfellas and Casino. However, it is Al Pacino who plays Jimmy Hoffa that steals the show delivering a stupendous performance who has links with the mob and ultimately befriends Frank Sheeran.

Scorsese's cinematic chops are in prime form in the film, paying attention to detail in every sequence of the film, allowing the film's sequencing to run as smoothly and adequately as possible. The screenplay by Steve Zaillian is as enticing, gripping and poignant as a film can get leaving audiences with questions of their own by the end of the film. The editing, costume design and cinematography among other elements all complement each other in order to bring about life to the screen. The best way to see the film is on the big screen for the full experience, the TV screen just wont cut it but it boils down to preference.

Some people have complained about the film's length, which I have found surprising because I thought the runtime was perfect and I would not have minded if the film added an extra 10 to 20 minutes. Films like Once Upon A Time in America, Schindler's List and The Godfather 1 and 2 have all shared similar lengths and at the time of release, the length of the films were not criticised as much as this film. It shows how the attention spans of today's audience has changed. Other complaints were to do with CGI de-aging that Scorsese used on all three characters. I personally thought the technology was excellent and it really de-ages the characters really well. Viewers are able to notice the technology in the first flashback scene where Pesci and De Niro are having a conversation about the truck. However, others thought it looked phony on the characters and that it was annoying to observe. I rate this film 5/5 and urge people to see the film without any interruption. I would also emphasize that audiences see the film twice due to various information and elements in the film being missed in the first screening. I would recommend that the viewer wait a week to view it a second time. Martin Scorsese is my favorite director and I must say The Irishman has become my favorite film by the director. Congratulations Scorsese on this masterpiece!
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
eded9999Dec 8, 2019
Very well made.
Amazing cast.
The Story is not that interesting.
Wayyyyy too long.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
saitoroi147Dec 8, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Ótima atuação de Robert De Niro, ótima composição de cenas além de o roteiro ser bem desenvolvido. Apesar de longo, o filme mostra como as gangues trabalhavam e como elas influenciavam e eram influenciadas . Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
BHBarryDec 8, 2019
“The Irishman” stars Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Al Pacino in this epic saga of mob life in post World War II America. Based on the book by Charles Brandt and screenplay by Steven Zaillian, and ably directed by Martin Scorcese, the film“The Irishman” stars Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Al Pacino in this epic saga of mob life in post World War II America. Based on the book by Charles Brandt and screenplay by Steven Zaillian, and ably directed by Martin Scorcese, the film traces the life of Frank Sheehan (Mr. De Niro) as he rises from meat truck driver to a confidant of Jimmy Hoffa with ties to the “bosses” of the underworld. The film relies upon and uses “flashback” techniques which, if not done properly, might otherwise interfere with the viewer’s experience. In this instance, however, Mr. Scorcese masterfully utilizes the process to tell a story that, in spite of its 209 minutes of screen time, moves smoothly and rapidly from scene to scene. I give the film an 8 for affording the audience a gratifying theatrical experience and, in addition, for giving it the opportunity to witness the extraordinary acting talents of its 3 main stars as they perform under the magical wand of its director. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Mohammad-YaghiDec 8, 2019
Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci are incredible !!
Its really that the gold never rusts
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
nanohulkDec 8, 2019
Scorsese Masterpiece is one of his best movies that he has made in his whole life
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
3
SturmhardtDec 8, 2019
Actors playing roles they should be at least 30 years younger for to be believable. It's like an olg people's home from hollywood.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
RochyrochDec 8, 2019
Visually incredible, the effects work in ageing and making the actors younger is just amazing. I'm under the impression that this is also a rather accurate historical movie with most respects, the attention to detail is also impressive.
My
Visually incredible, the effects work in ageing and making the actors younger is just amazing. I'm under the impression that this is also a rather accurate historical movie with most respects, the attention to detail is also impressive.
My only problem with the movie is that the middle drags on with very little happening apart from creating scene after scene of cliched mob dialogue, someone said something about you, oh did he well you tell him I said blah blah atc, and to be honest if it was split up and you put those scenes into other mob movies they would be great, but it's just a tab monotonous and loses its impact when you get the feeling that the mob is a little bit like mean girls. It's not Goodfellas.
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
BcattacbDec 7, 2019
One of Scorsese's best, and the relationship between Pacino and Deniro may be the real heart of the film, Joe Pesce's brilliant performance grounds the whole story.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
Mats2468Dec 7, 2019
One of the most overrated movies ever created, period. I don't get why this film got so praise. The fact that it is so many legendary actors in this film is awesome, no doubt but it dosen't make it a good movie. The story however, is quiteOne of the most overrated movies ever created, period. I don't get why this film got so praise. The fact that it is so many legendary actors in this film is awesome, no doubt but it dosen't make it a good movie. The story however, is quite confusing because how De Niro tells it. While you watching this movie, like everyone said, is that it is very easy to get bored thanks for it's film's pacing. I think that a 4/10 is a perfect score to give. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ApolscDec 7, 2019
It is a mafia movie homage. It has got all the cliches. And some of the new things are really bad, like making de Niro s face look younger but making him fight like his old self. It is also a homage for Pacino, he doesn't play Hoffa he onlyIt is a mafia movie homage. It has got all the cliches. And some of the new things are really bad, like making de Niro s face look younger but making him fight like his old self. It is also a homage for Pacino, he doesn't play Hoffa he only plays himself like he s been doing it in at least ten years. Joe Pesci is fantastic. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Jd0rnDec 6, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Long, very long movie. Took me two times to really watch it. But I remember every great mob movie growing up, I always wished they went into more detail. This movie doesn’t skimp. They cover the entire story and if you have the patience, you will truly appreciate the great cinematic story they are conveying. 10/10 just don’t even start the movie unless you are in the right mindset to watch for 3 hours. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
3
Metacritic1908Dec 6, 2019
Slow hard to follow, drawn out. Not engaging enough to get excited about. The actors characters are ok but it’s all over the place and overrated.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
opeloDec 6, 2019
One of The best movies of The year, Maybe even of decade. Must see for those how like criminal dramas.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
6
Lost-SockDec 6, 2019
Ultimately this film is a tad on the boring side, and utterly self indulgent. I enjoyed the last hour or so, but the first hour in particular was a real slog to get through and I actually watched the film in 3 sittings, not due to timeUltimately this film is a tad on the boring side, and utterly self indulgent. I enjoyed the last hour or so, but the first hour in particular was a real slog to get through and I actually watched the film in 3 sittings, not due to time restraints, purely as I became too bored to continue twice. The casting of Combo from This Is England (I forget his name, some scouser) was dreadful, his attempt at the accent - I think it was New Jersey or similar, is absolutely dreadful and really stands out, easily the worst part of the film for me and he ruined every scene he was in. The real travesty in the film was the anti-aging used, it simply doesn't work. It's OK making De Niro look 50 again, but when he moves like an old man it's unintentionally hilarious, a scene where he beats someone up had me in stitches, you could blatantly tell it was an old man doing it, with some silly Toy Story style cgi making his face look younger. Of course you get the standard Rolling Stones song thrown in as per usual as well, I'm not sure if the director is unaware it's a parody now how he crowbars the same damn tune into every film he makes or he's in on the joke. I've given it a 6/10 as like I said, I enjoyed the last hour, and Joe Pesci is fantastic in it, it's really a shame he doesn't act anymore and I've really missed him the past two decades. Pacino however, well he's the same old hammy, shouty, over-acting self and it's clear why Scorsese hadn't worked with him previously - the guy can't act, and De Niro is De Niro, the man has one style no matter what role he's taking and his constant sniffing and breathing in only gets worse now he's ancient. All in all though, it's clearly a vanity project by Scorsese, and a last chance for him to get all his doddery old fart friends together before they all start dying. I'm baffled how this film is being lauded so highly, it's very mundane and in parts will make you almost fall asleep, De Niros performance is phoned in, Pacino is as awful as ever, the CGI is immersion breaking, when Gimme Shelter comes on AGAIN in a MS film you'll either laugh or roll your eyes, the Scouser playing an American stands out like a sore thumb and it's at least an hour too long. The only redeeming feature is the excellent Joe Pesci. If not for him appearing, and a decent last hour then I don't think I'd rate it any higher than a 4. It's clear to see why this ended up on Netflix, it's simply not good enough for a theatre release and people would have either walked out through sheer boredom, or fallen asleep. It'll be a real shame if this ends up being the last Scorsese film, or the last time you see Pesci and De Niro together as quite frankly, the film is dogsh**. Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
8
BrunoVn00Dec 5, 2019
Yes, it is TOO LONG. I didn't feel like the movie needed to be three and a half hours long to tell the story it wanted to tell. I feel like the main theme and the point of the movie could've fit perfectly in a two and a half hour long movie.Yes, it is TOO LONG. I didn't feel like the movie needed to be three and a half hours long to tell the story it wanted to tell. I feel like the main theme and the point of the movie could've fit perfectly in a two and a half hour long movie. At points it seemed like the movie dragged too much. There were a lot of scenes that were just boring because of the uninteresting situation, but those scenes were saved by wonderful performances. That is a point I will not deny: The performances are just fantastic. Probably one of the best acted films I've seen all year. This is a movie in which I don't know how to feel, because, like I said, at points it lost my interest, but at other points I thought it was the best film of the year. Its good moments are fantastic and to me, the ending saves the movie completely.

Besides the overly long runtime, I noticed some editing and sound issues. I don't know but at points I noticed that the ADR was poorly edited. At some points I saw a character move his lips and there was no audio or it was delayed. There was one point in the movie where there was an editing mistake that felt so amateur: There was a shot and then abruptly cut to another shot, like if the editor messed up. Also there is a scene where the characters are at like a party and, while it's not a crowded and loud place, the scene sounded as if the characters were in a quiet room with a radio playing music in the background, so distracting.

Other than that, I feel like this movie was great. I know this might not be a movie for everyone. It has tons of complicated dialogue and the movie relies heavily in dialogue and narration. There's little to no visual storytelling or music (specifically, original score). This movie is tedious but I don't think it's bad or boring.
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
10
MrNightOwlDec 5, 2019
This film is masterpiece. Yeah no for everbody but it is. Fantastic work with camera and music. Fantastic work Mr.Scorsese
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
Alex_ColDec 5, 2019
No hay nada nuevo... es más nostalgia nada más.
En cuanto a los CGI no se encuentran entre los mejores.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
BerikDec 5, 2019
The Irishman is a movie based on a novel, describing a theory about the dissapearance of Jimmy Hoffa. It stars actors like Robert De Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci, making for an interesting cast. As for the result though, i was expectingThe Irishman is a movie based on a novel, describing a theory about the dissapearance of Jimmy Hoffa. It stars actors like Robert De Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci, making for an interesting cast. As for the result though, i was expecting something more thrilling.

The movie does its job of characterizing the several characters, but fails in creating a sense of excitement, tension or atmosphere. Lots of scenes feature very slow, awkward dialogues, and it doesn't help that the CGI that is supposed to make characters look younger and older looks very fake. De Niro looks like a freaking alien with his green eyes. It was enjoyable enough, but just enough as there isn't much in this movie to make it memorable (except the incredibly fake and creepy green eyes). Also, 3,5 hours is way to long considering how little excitement is in it. I give this movie a 7/10.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
ger89Dec 4, 2019
Una película de mafiosos más basada en la amistad que en el poder en sí, aunque este tema se mantiene fuerte en toda la película. Es larga, y por momentos te perdés, pero la fuerza de la historia y el final, la hacen una película merecedoraUna película de mafiosos más basada en la amistad que en el poder en sí, aunque este tema se mantiene fuerte en toda la película. Es larga, y por momentos te perdés, pero la fuerza de la historia y el final, la hacen una película merecedora de una alta nota Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
9
gustavoriquelmeDec 4, 2019
And Scorsese did it again. I'm gonna talk about The Irishman in three words: What a picture.

Besides that, it's one of the greatest 2019 films for sure. An amazing direction, a great script, and memorable performances are enough to make this
And Scorsese did it again. I'm gonna talk about The Irishman in three words: What a picture.

Besides that, it's one of the greatest 2019 films for sure. An amazing direction, a great script, and memorable performances are enough to make this film a masterpiece.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
wevertonaguiiarDec 4, 2019
Obviamente esse é um bom filme, porém poderia ser ótimo. Dá pra sentir facilmente as 3h30; a família do personagem principal poderia ter sido mais bem explorada; e falta tensão aqui. Mas o elenco e o roteiro são bons e conseguem carregar oObviamente esse é um bom filme, porém poderia ser ótimo. Dá pra sentir facilmente as 3h30; a família do personagem principal poderia ter sido mais bem explorada; e falta tensão aqui. Mas o elenco e o roteiro são bons e conseguem carregar o filme. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
JamanDec 4, 2019
I thoroughly enjoyed every minute of The Irishman. OK, the age-rectifying CGI wasn't convincing - even off-putting at times - but otherwise it is a brilliantly made, engrossing film with superb performances all-round. I can't vouch for it'sI thoroughly enjoyed every minute of The Irishman. OK, the age-rectifying CGI wasn't convincing - even off-putting at times - but otherwise it is a brilliantly made, engrossing film with superb performances all-round. I can't vouch for it's historical accuracy, but who can? Joe Pesci deserves all the plaudits coming his way, he was mesmerising. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
ciuciuriatkaDec 4, 2019
old pricks same ticks ..boring.not worth watch even 30min. champagne who does finish this "epic" thing. scorsese need take his young lads and retired so we could see some fresh faces.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
devilsdesignDec 4, 2019
The majority of the negative comments about this film originate from people who disagree with De Niros politics, namely his outspoken criticism of Trump. The New York posts Andrea Peyser is a clear example of this type of fake journalism.The majority of the negative comments about this film originate from people who disagree with De Niros politics, namely his outspoken criticism of Trump. The New York posts Andrea Peyser is a clear example of this type of fake journalism. Make sure to write the new York post that this woman should be fired for allowing her political views to dictate how she writes movie reviews. Make no mistake, Scorsese is at the top of his game with this one. its long but not slow and adequately fast paced condensing 50 years of history into a few hours. If you like gangster films of any type than you'll love this one. It has just about everything. Sometimes the CGI is noticeable but it doesn't really detract from the film and after a few minutes you don't even realize it's there. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
JumpCut_OnlineDec 4, 2019
If it isn’t hyperbolic to say, The Irishman is yet another masterpiece from the master filmmaker, and one which can quite easily stand alongside the films previously mentioned here, and of course all of the other incredible pieces of work inIf it isn’t hyperbolic to say, The Irishman is yet another masterpiece from the master filmmaker, and one which can quite easily stand alongside the films previously mentioned here, and of course all of the other incredible pieces of work in Scorsese’s filmography. It is perhaps worth knowing that this might not be the “gangster” film you’re expecting from Scorsese, but it is exactly the sort of gangster film he should be making at this point in his career. It’s reflective, powerfully, surprisingly emotional and a perfect tribute to both his films that have come before this, and the man himself. Truly exceptional. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Filmix16Dec 4, 2019
Le scènario est très bien développé dans son ensemble. L’histoire et les personnages évolue tous au même niveau. Al Pacino est plus que incroyable, Joe Pesci est très bin et Robert DeNiro est remarquable et Martin Scorsese nous offre unLe scènario est très bien développé dans son ensemble. L’histoire et les personnages évolue tous au même niveau. Al Pacino est plus que incroyable, Joe Pesci est très bin et Robert DeNiro est remarquable et Martin Scorsese nous offre un chef-d’œuvre. Le film a de bonnes idées et de la bonne musique. La fin est tout aussi surprenante pour seu qui connaissait la tragique fin de Jimmy Hoffa et seu qui ne la connaissait pas. Le vieillissement des acteurs est très réaliste et le rajeunissement n’est pas parfait. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
egoBorderDec 4, 2019
Aside from the awful CGI de-aging effects, which don't work at all except to constantly remind the audience they're watching a famous old actor pretending to be younger, this movie is just off somehow. It doesn't have the greatest ofAside from the awful CGI de-aging effects, which don't work at all except to constantly remind the audience they're watching a famous old actor pretending to be younger, this movie is just off somehow. It doesn't have the greatest of introductions, and it suffers from bad pacing throughout. As it is, it's a challenge to remain invested in the story despite good characters and subject matter. Scorsese seems distracted here, and his usual energy is missing. Worth a watch, but given its length it will feel like a slog at times. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
TedDawsonDec 4, 2019
A good one. De-Age-Technology was weird - especially on the eyes - To me De-Niro looked like Face-Swapped-Deepfaked with Robert Patrick. If you also put aside the question if Frank painted that much houses and esp. painted that ONE house -A good one. De-Age-Technology was weird - especially on the eyes - To me De-Niro looked like Face-Swapped-Deepfaked with Robert Patrick. If you also put aside the question if Frank painted that much houses and esp. painted that ONE house - you can watch a good mobster movie that also gave me a lot of emotions and connection to the characters. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
GLADIADORDec 4, 2019
Acho que pelas cenas de tiro e mortes em camera lenta vale, mais o filme é muito longo e cansativo, poderiam corta uma hora desse filme facilmente
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
NemosDec 4, 2019
It's rare in this day and age to see a movie actually warranting a 10, but this is one. It's a long movie, but it is as long as it needs to be and never goes flat. A must see!
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
WellanSmysseDec 3, 2019
The Irishman ...

Sans doute LE film que j’attendais le plus en cette fin d’année ! A ce niveau là, ce n’est plus un film mais un chef d’œuvre, un diamant poli par l’art de Scorsese avec un magnifique De Niro
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
BaowDec 3, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. We all age, we all know that, thanks for the reminder Mr Scorcese. But you didnt have to put us through this 3.5hrs long movie to make your point. It iq not a type of film that I would willingly watch again, it is disapointing, glad it is on Netflix Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
kevinCHONDec 3, 2019
This film followed the same script as any other mob movie by Scorecese: "look how bad, violent, and petty these guys are". The movie is full of cliche lines that are meant to seem deep, but fall very short. If you are entertained by the movieThis film followed the same script as any other mob movie by Scorecese: "look how bad, violent, and petty these guys are". The movie is full of cliche lines that are meant to seem deep, but fall very short. If you are entertained by the movie done better a hundred times over, this movie is for you. Nothing new here. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ryang1790Dec 3, 2019
Scorsese's latest masterpiece is also his most ambitious work to date, a tour-de-force of historical intrigue, compelling performances, and a razor-sharp script. While the 3 1/2 hour runtime may be a detriment at first, it quickly becomesScorsese's latest masterpiece is also his most ambitious work to date, a tour-de-force of historical intrigue, compelling performances, and a razor-sharp script. While the 3 1/2 hour runtime may be a detriment at first, it quickly becomes irrelevant as each scene slowly unfolds into the wider narrative, culminating in a final hour climax that is some of the best cinema ever to be filmed. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
AndremaxDec 3, 2019
Before watching The Irishman, the impression left is that Scorcese is repeating his several movie's formula but in a three-and-a-half hour tiring. But again, director proves us opposite, movie not only makes us creating an emotional loop withBefore watching The Irishman, the impression left is that Scorcese is repeating his several movie's formula but in a three-and-a-half hour tiring. But again, director proves us opposite, movie not only makes us creating an emotional loop with characters as history is driven naturally and spontaneous. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
HobbinatorDec 3, 2019
Simply put, this movie is not for me. A movie that is 210 minutes long, with actors WELL past their prime. The CGI makes the actors look fake. Simply do what they have been doing for decades, have someone else play the actors in their youngerSimply put, this movie is not for me. A movie that is 210 minutes long, with actors WELL past their prime. The CGI makes the actors look fake. Simply do what they have been doing for decades, have someone else play the actors in their younger years. I love football, but I don't want to see a 63 year old Joe Montana take the field. Where are all the up and coming directors and actors? Retro is cool as retro. But when you try to make it a part of today, it folds like a cheap chair. This movie is a one time watch for me. Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
10
razvtDec 3, 2019
I expected this movie to be good since it has such a good cast and Scorsese as a director. But I didn't expect it to be a masterpiece. Outstanding movie from all aspects.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
AnUserDec 3, 2019
Like every other work of Sir Scorsese it's very good crime /action /drama and... even can't be understand by 1 time watching , but know that it was a grate piece or effect and real work of art that could see from a good teamwork with netflixLike every other work of Sir Scorsese it's very good crime /action /drama and... even can't be understand by 1 time watching , but know that it was a grate piece or effect and real work of art that could see from a good teamwork with netflix and their stuffs for young actors part but could work more on Mr.Pesci but any way best. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
3
MccuskyDec 2, 2019
Not much difference between other mob movies, kinda dull and uneventful. I would probably have enjoyed it more if it was my first gangster movie but this just about rolls through every cliche there is. Although performances were good INot much difference between other mob movies, kinda dull and uneventful. I would probably have enjoyed it more if it was my first gangster movie but this just about rolls through every cliche there is. Although performances were good I couldn't find the characters that convincing Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
9
SaharMDec 2, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. That is one of the best mobvie in dicade. The acting is perfect and when you wach the movie you want follow it Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
1
JRknowsfilmDec 2, 2019
Wow that was terrible...could not get through the first hour. Thank God it was on Netflix and I didnt have to spend a dime on it.
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
9
SphericalDec 2, 2019
A harrowing tale. Plays great on a TV, regardless of what some might say.

The movie is almost a full reunion of all the actors we’ve grown accustomed with seeing in mobster cinema—and boy can they act!
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
ZlatanDec 2, 2019
Like Martin had a bet with Quentin Tarantino on making the longest, most boring movie and he won this year.
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
10
BuongiornoPaulDec 2, 2019
I admit before watching The Irishman I was intimidated by the 3.5 hour run time, so I kept holding it off. Let me just say there is no reason to be intimidated, those 3.5 hours flew by extraordinarily quickly and made me wish more films wereI admit before watching The Irishman I was intimidated by the 3.5 hour run time, so I kept holding it off. Let me just say there is no reason to be intimidated, those 3.5 hours flew by extraordinarily quickly and made me wish more films were like this. Side note, the 'de-aging' technology was absolutely incredible, did not take me out of the moment and kept me in the movie. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
ArthuuDec 2, 2019
Outstanding writing served with top notch themed noir plot and memorable characters played by holywood's greatest; big tribute to Goodfellas and a must watch in general
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
LouAnnDDec 2, 2019
This is a rare film that continuously captivates. Acting is superb. Every frame seems lovingly filmed. Reminds of the good old days of good movies.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
ericrendeiroDec 1, 2019
3 hours and a half of pure slow story building. None the less, Martin Scorcerse has surpassed himself once again.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
Alex_1996Dec 1, 2019
A masterclass in storytelling. Scorsese employs flashes of his usual visual style, but this film is reliant on the performances and the layering and complexity of the decades-spanning story. Schoonmaker is on top of her editing powers as perA masterclass in storytelling. Scorsese employs flashes of his usual visual style, but this film is reliant on the performances and the layering and complexity of the decades-spanning story. Schoonmaker is on top of her editing powers as per usual. Not only is this an instant classic, but it serves as a wonderful addition to his oeuvre. Whereas GoodFellas is kinetically dynamic in its camera movement and editing, this film contrapuntally unravels with subtle flourishes and a slow-burn methodology, making for a contemplative film. By the film's conclusion you’ll come face-to-face with your own mortality and how you’d like to look back at your earlier life, which beckons a re-evaluation of life in the present moment. In the end, there is no doubt that this film surpasses its genre tropes and achieves what few films do: greatness. Scorsese delivers a classic to close the decade, and considering his being three years away from 80, I wonder what other tricks he may have up his sleeve, because if he can make something like this there is no telling what's to come. I'm deeply grateful to be on the receiving end of his art. Did I mention how great, Robert De Niro and company are? Folks this film is for all-time. Enough said. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
1
cubanmuscle9Dec 1, 2019
Worthless, senseless, violent, predictable, boring, walked out of the movie 45 mins into it. Deniro used to be a great actor but now he is a prost!tute making films that contradict everything he says he hates about Trump. Its the 21st CenturyWorthless, senseless, violent, predictable, boring, walked out of the movie 45 mins into it. Deniro used to be a great actor but now he is a prost!tute making films that contradict everything he says he hates about Trump. Its the 21st Century and here Deniro romanticizes life as a loudmouth, racist, bully CGI old man who uses Catholicism as a predictable prop. Pity he wasnt offed in the first 30 mins. Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
9
FalzalatDec 1, 2019
The music selections were great. The shooting scenario is great. all the scenes were like a work of art. a great film with great attention to detail. From the smallest player to the leading roles, everyone has performed perfectly.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
psyberdelicDec 1, 2019
I only got through the first 20 minutes or so before i gave up. It's a workman like film with a whole lot of "been there done it better" vibe. And it's loooooong. The critics are obviously praising the director and actor for their pastI only got through the first 20 minutes or so before i gave up. It's a workman like film with a whole lot of "been there done it better" vibe. And it's loooooong. The critics are obviously praising the director and actor for their past performances. Long and boring. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
2
BroyaxDec 1, 2019
Scorsese retourne à ses amours, à savoir la grande saga mafieuse dont il a le secret ou plutôt dont il avait le secret dans le temps, jadis... il a convié à cette réunion nostalgique les comparses d'antan comme Joe Pesci et Robert de NiroScorsese retourne à ses amours, à savoir la grande saga mafieuse dont il a le secret ou plutôt dont il avait le secret dans le temps, jadis... il a convié à cette réunion nostalgique les comparses d'antan comme Joe Pesci et Robert de Niro ainsi qu'un petit nouveau, Al Pacino !... sans compter Harvey Keitel qui avait joué dans Taxi Driver !

On l'a compris, c'est un film de **** jeunes ici... qu'il a fallu rajeunir vraiment par ordinateur, l'histoire se déroulant sur quelques décennies. Alors, il ne faut pas s'étonner si nos vieux mal photoshopés ressemblent un peu aux frères Bogdanov ! c'est clairement raté et rien à faire, on n'arrive pas à s'y faire...

L'autre souci -énorme aussi celui-là- concerne la narration et le rythme qui se traînent lamentablement, car le film déambule à **** pas comme un fossile sur son déambulateur : il ne faut pas moins de 3h30 pour y arriver... éventuellement mais au bout d'un heure, les paupières se font déjà lourdes alors que cette saga tourne en rond sur elle-même comme un pépé sénile d'Alzheimer.

La réalisation reste naturellement très soignée et souvent élégante, la voix off est bel et bien là mais l'humour féroce des Affranchis ou de Casino a quasiment disparu, dilué dans les 3h30 de ce long gala d'anciens combattants qui n'en finit pas...

A dormir debout, mou et dépassé, The Irishman n'est qu'une ombre très pâle et pauvrette des gloires du temps d'avant mais la nostalgie n'est plus de saison, camarade, même si Netflix met la main à la poche, balançant le fric par les fenêtres... en vain.
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
PopovalexDec 1, 2019
Идеально! Есть фильмы после которых ты просто смотришь титры и не можешь осознать, что произошло. А произошел великолепный фильм
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
theredskyDec 1, 2019
Martin Scorsese is still at the top of his game even after directing for more than 50 years. This is one of my favorite Scorsese films that he has directed behind Goodfellas and Taxi Driver. This film came so close to becoming a masterpieceMartin Scorsese is still at the top of his game even after directing for more than 50 years. This is one of my favorite Scorsese films that he has directed behind Goodfellas and Taxi Driver. This film came so close to becoming a masterpiece if it wasn’t for the first 30 minutes being a little too confusing. It was a little hard to understand what was going on but I eventually caught on to what was happening. There is not one bad performance in this film. Every actor brings their A-game especially Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci, and Al Pacino. Each of them is incredible in their roles and adds many different layers to their respective characters but I felt Joe Pesci did the best job. He made Russell Bufalino seem like an intimidating but kind character that was always intriguing to watch. Robert De Niro made his character, Frank Sheeran, seem like a hardcore badass who didn’t make enough time for his family and Al Pacino made Jimmy Hoffa feel like a kind yet hotheaded and naive man. The script and de aging effects done on these characters is great also. Most films that use de aging and aging effects don’t like that great in the light but Martin Scorsese found a way to make it look really good. The actors make these effects even better. When they are made to look younger, the actors use their physical performance to look younger and the same when they are aged to look older. They use their physical performance to make themselves feel older. Even though the movie is 3 and a half hours long, I never felt the runtime. The story is always investing even when it is confusing. I was never bored throughout the course of the film. The last hour of the film was fantastic. If you have seen the trailers then you know the film has Jimmy Hoffa in it played by Al Pacino and the last hour “deals” with him. It’s beautifully executed and acting and the final scene is heartbreaking yet intriguing. Although this is far from Scorsese’s first look at mobsters and gangsters, this film does enough that is unique to differentiate itself from his other works. The soundtrack choices were great and fit the tone of the film pretty well and all the other technical aspects were done pretty well. Overall, The Irishman is yet again another great look at mobsters with fantastic performances, a compelling story, and fantastic direction from Martin Scorsese. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
CrimsonFlushDec 1, 2019
Great movie, but Frank Sheeran was a pathological liar, not a pathological killer. Movie should get an oscar nod, brings back some of the old crew from Goodfellas
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
Joe627487136Nov 30, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It is a movie that will teach people something.. A lot of people dislike De Niro's wooden acting... Maybe it is just because they do not understand...

The acting and story is just pure gold. If you remember when JKF being assassinated and J Hoffa and Frank knowing this from a small restaurant through television broadcast... Their reaction is just pure gold (especially Hoffa).

There are a lot of interesting facts inside the story as well. Robert Kennedy failed to accused Hoffa but once JFK got his presidency and Robert immediate being promoted and took down Hoffa...

Tbh to understand this movie, it would need the audience to know a bit about politics and history (which I think is very necessarily required and this additional requirement would be my reason for 9/10 but not 10/10) but besides that is just a pure masterpiece!
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
FaultlinespineNov 30, 2019
Very well made, character-driven drama with extraordinary performances by all. The world building and attention to detail really invests you in the story. It manages to balance realism and no frills grit with entertainment value very well.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
Thejaw221Nov 30, 2019
This movie was so absolutely boring I didn’t even wait to get to the end. I shut it off. the Robert De Niro we fell in love with well...he has departed for places unknown. Unfortunately one of his worst movies.... This film was so badThis movie was so absolutely boring I didn’t even wait to get to the end. I shut it off. the Robert De Niro we fell in love with well...he has departed for places unknown. Unfortunately one of his worst movies.... This film was so bad Hollywood didn’t even want it Expand
7 of 22 users found this helpful715
All this user's reviews
5
gxm143Nov 30, 2019
Great performances, but best movie of the year? Not even in the top 5, imo, amongst what I've seen. Very little drama, suspense, or emotion. And the women in the film speak about 5 lines. I was supremely disappointed.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
10
Lonejumper23Nov 30, 2019
This is an outstanding movie and to see these 3 epic actors portray these roles was outstanding!!! 3.5 hrs went by in 2 hrs and the story is captivating and entertaining. To capture that era like this and to show the true reality of thatThis is an outstanding movie and to see these 3 epic actors portray these roles was outstanding!!! 3.5 hrs went by in 2 hrs and the story is captivating and entertaining. To capture that era like this and to show the true reality of that crime world to this level was surreal. DeNiro should get an Oscar for his acting and well done! Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
matthewmirlianiNov 30, 2019
It’s definitely worth the hype, and definitely worth the 3 1/2 hours of viewing time. Set against the backdrop of the industrial Mid-Atlantic during some of the country’s most turbulent political and social events, The Irishman is 2019’sIt’s definitely worth the hype, and definitely worth the 3 1/2 hours of viewing time. Set against the backdrop of the industrial Mid-Atlantic during some of the country’s most turbulent political and social events, The Irishman is 2019’s first perfect film - one that is so good, it doesn’t even feel like it belongs in this decade, but rather feels like a masterpiece unearthed from decades earlier. De Niro, Pacino, Pesci are everything you want them to be and more in their performances; the writing, pacing, and editing are tight; the humor is dark, fast, and intelligent; and the story unravels beautifully . While the running time may require patience and dedication, there truly is no wasted moment - no extraneous or lagging scenes - as everything fits together seamlessly to deliver a payoff that is truly worth it. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
4
katezoeNov 30, 2019
Disappointed and I am a huge fan of Scorsese since the beginning of his career and have loved his prior mob films. Movie is too long. Stylistically unstylish picture without the luridness of “Casino”, pulse-pounding narrative of “TheDisappointed and I am a huge fan of Scorsese since the beginning of his career and have loved his prior mob films. Movie is too long. Stylistically unstylish picture without the luridness of “Casino”, pulse-pounding narrative of “The Departed” or madness/brutality of “Goodfellas.” Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
4
carldamnitNov 30, 2019
I don't understand what's happening and I keep rewinding and I still don't know and it's become a five hour movie at this point and it's boring and I feel stupid and I want to die and it's still not over yet I'm not even watching it right nowI don't understand what's happening and I keep rewinding and I still don't know and it's become a five hour movie at this point and it's boring and I feel stupid and I want to die and it's still not over yet I'm not even watching it right now some epic, epically boring! King of Comedy was better Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews