Read User Reviews and Submit your own for The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

7

Fixer84Mar 16, 2023

In my opinion it is the best of the trilogy, Smaug is graphically well rendered and is a mysterious and interesting villain.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JP32Nov 16, 2022

You get your money’s worth from Jackson, who still proves to be one of the tippy top action directors working.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Manuel89qqNov 5, 2022

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Manuel189qqSep 27, 2022

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Bene213Sep 11, 2022

Ist ein sehr guter Film Der Film hat eine gute Story Und sieht auch super aus

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

ThunderMonkeyJun 16, 2022

I can only think of one expression for this, cheap.
You can tell that the film was produced quickly and did not cost much money.
No comparison, not even close to Lord of the Rings.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

iCampoRamilNov 16, 2021

A pesar de ser, para mi, la peor de las 3, sigue siendo una obra magistral en todos sus aspectos.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

clem666Jun 17, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Second part of the second trilogy, 'The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug' keeps a similar artistic direction as the first episode of the series. The humor is more forced than ever with effortless and clichéd dialogues that try desperately to be quotable. The acting is particularly poor, as if almost all the characters were trying to be as unemotional as possible. I found Thorin (Richard Armitage), Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly) and Kili (Aidan Turner) trying to be as uninvolved as possible here. Fortunately Bilbo (Martin Freeman) saves it all with his incredible and nuanced acting. The romance is terribly tasteless, cheesy, predictable and poorly written and exposed.

We get to know the characters better, but it's not always for the better: Smaug appears to be much dumber than expected and described previously, Gandalf is useless and can't help but make the worst decisions, and Azog spends all his precious time riding around, searching and finding no one. Dwarves spend their time trying to be stealthy or quick to escape situations but come on, we all know those actions are what dwarves are worst at doing! Their overall choices and behaviors don't match the fantasy lore at all. There are way too many factors depending on luck to help the plot move on. Thorin clearly drove me mad as he tries to be charismatic, loud and royal during numerous scenes. Did we really see him navigate a river of molten gold on an iron wheelbarrow? Seriously? The ring and its powers are overused and always (and I mean always) help Bilbo to get out of many tricky situations.

Some of the special effects are pretty bad, although there are some wonderful landscapes here and there, as well as many easter eggs that deepen the story.

In conclusion, "The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug" is more a visual adventure than an interesting story, as inconsistencies and senseless scenes are overrepresented. The ending clif-hanger is predictable and as forced as many other major scenes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

r96skFeb 20, 2021

Still very good, but I found 'The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug' to be a step below the preceding 2012 release.

The conclusion is what affects it the most, in my opinion. It isn't anything bad, but it goes on for too long - yet the endingStill very good, but I found 'The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug' to be a step below the preceding 2012 release.

The conclusion is what affects it the most, in my opinion. It isn't anything bad, but it goes on for too long - yet the ending itself comes out of nowhere a little. It's iffily crafted, with the entertainment value not enough to cover it up. Again, nothing anywhere near terrible... just not as great as I wanted/expected.

I also kinda wanted more scenes with Martin Freeman (Bilbo) across the midway point. I like the focus on Richard Armitage (Thorin) & Co. but I felt there needed to be more with the lead - and with Ian McKellen (Gandalf), for that matter.

I've led with my negatives first, but I have many positives too. I enjoyed the scenes in Esgaroth with Luke Evans (Bard), all of the stuff there looks awesome. The character of Tauriel, played by Evangeline Lilly, is cool. Orlando Bloom (Legolas) remains fun to watch. Everything else, including the score, is very nicely done - as anticipated.

Love the end credits song ("I See Fire") by Ed Sheeran, by the way. Not quite as grand and great as "May It Be" from LOTR, but it's pretty close!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MmmsyJan 9, 2021

Its just a very good movie. Not the best but worth watching. Maybe it is not the same as book but still very good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Mikibruno02Nov 8, 2020

It's not a bad movie overall, but being used to a flawless Middle-earth, this movie makes me turn up my nose. So ... script that begins to wobble more than the first film and in fact I start to worry about the final film ... Until I arrive inIt's not a bad movie overall, but being used to a flawless Middle-earth, this movie makes me turn up my nose. So ... script that begins to wobble more than the first film and in fact I start to worry about the final film ... Until I arrive in the city and in Erebor, the plot is boring and devoid of the typical magic of the first film. What destroys this film for me is the presence of Orlando Bloom with Legolas, which is senseless and leads this film to be a fan-film and not a sacred monster of cinema. The soundtrack is not bad but it begins to decay. On the bright side of this film is Benedict Cumberbatch doing a crazy (!) Job for Smaug. The scene inside the mountain is really beautiful, and actually this is what brings my rating from 6 (just enough) to 7.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

NikopooOct 15, 2020

These movies are a huge cringe-fest, albeit as far as a terrible series who insults the movies before it goes with clearly just trying to fill their pockets with money, this one was moderately entertaining.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Cementer200Sep 27, 2020

The Hobbit The Desolation of Smaug is a good movie. The movie continues on The Hobbit journey to kill the dragon.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SoapNuggetJul 14, 2020

The film is definitely an improvement over the first one but still suffers from trying to stretch a small book into a 3 hour long epic but still is fun.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DiptanshuJul 4, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Amazingly Entertaining and Adventurous movie!its the best in the Prequel's.the music,the visuals and CGI it was literally an Art.the acting was great.the new characters were amazingly showcased and they're great,the story and screenplay was brilliant unlike 1st one it didn't slow the pace or got bore even for a moment it was engaging and entertaining.the build-up of last movie was amazingly continued in it with more awesome situations and surprises.the starting intro and flashback 1st meet of Dwarf king and Gandalf it was amazing start from then on the adventure begins the close to mountain sight with the heated situation from the Azog and upon that the Gandalf's leaving for different quest and the Journey of Dwarfs without him it was challenging for them and it was amazing and engaging.the little little helps for journey from the transformed men and then sailor and elfs it was great,the Spider fight was amazing and awesome as a reference to Frodo's in LOTR,the Elf's saving the day with surprising Appearance of Legolas it was great and then Elf's taking dwarfs as prisoner's and there interaction it was amazing,the Gimli's reference was awesome as hell!the love relation build-up of She-elf and killi was sweet,She-elf was literally a Bad-ass fighter.the Bilbo's help for escape and the whole escape sequence with the awesome fight between dwarfs,Elf's and the Azog's army it was literally amazing and breathtaking literally each and every fight in this movie is incredibly epic and a piece of Art,the other side The Gandalf's journey and the Glimpse of Sauron and past-set-up for sequel Trilogy it was literally mind-blowing,the Sauron's Epic Glimpse is enough for chills it was awesome as hell!the further journey of Dwarfs with the Sailor man with the fish thing and refuge it was fun to watch the whole island thing and closest to mountain it was amazing,As a supporting character the sailor men and his family was amazingly showcased.the last act was literally goosebumps and incredible the key scene along with the entrance of mountain and Gold Flooded Room of Dwarf's it was amazing,then the conversation of Bilbo and Dragon and whole glimpse of Dragon it was fantastically shocking and awesome scene,on other hand the island attacks from Azog's person to Killi and then the rescue by elf's and all it was amazing,the King Dwarfs Pride moment with the House thing and whole ending standing against the dragon scene and at last the Gold pouring revenge scene it was full of excitement and amazing moment then the end with dragon escape and about to attack the city it was a jaw-dropping cliff-hanger at last it was a amazing end.Its a brilliant movie its adventurous,fun and entertaining with incredible visuals,fights and music it's better than 1st one and literally a Amazing sequel and best in prequel trilogy its a Great Movie!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

robertoiglesiasMay 21, 2020

I think it's a big improvement over The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, or as I like to call An Unexpected Filler. This film is a little overlong, but I still enjoyed it. 7.5/10

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Jaredc324Dec 11, 2019

Desolation of Smaug picks up the pace and enthralls us in maybe the most enticing parts of all the book, and leaving us in a place of perfect disclosure. But it does seem to drag from moment to moment, but equally gives us an insight on whatDesolation of Smaug picks up the pace and enthralls us in maybe the most enticing parts of all the book, and leaving us in a place of perfect disclosure. But it does seem to drag from moment to moment, but equally gives us an insight on what this trilogy could've been had it just been 1 or 2 films. i found myself connecting with this one more than the first due to the power of a love dynamic that brought a new found life in this story, Tolkien never intended on exploring. And the Dragon, voiced virvaciously by Benedict Cumberbatch, elevated the movie to an unforgettable level.
But in the end, it's just a shade better than the first being the most intruging part of the story, but still carries the same issues in length and over-conveyed character exposition that makes it lose it's mysticism. But a fine sequel nevertheless.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

BeatrixKiddoSep 14, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Less fascinating than the previous movie but still enjoyable. It was very adventurous and entertaining. Also, "I See Fire" was a great soundtrack. I liked this film a lot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JPKJun 24, 2019

Better Than An Unexpected Journey
Desolation Of Smaug has brilliant visuals and amazing performances (Especially Cumberbatch), and a decently written script.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

TyranianApr 11, 2019

The second Hobbit film has an awesome dragon but is otherwise worse than first film. Very disappointing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

RonantheAccuserMar 30, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There's so many things to say about this movie, I don't know where to begin. Even though the plot is easy to follow, it's still epic, has a great storyline, and a lot of character development absent from "The Lord of the Rings." Giant spiders, Orcs, a great dragon, a Necromancer revealed to be the Great Eye of Mor-I mean, Dol Guldur, really keeps Bilbo and Thorin's hands full. The Great Eye is a terrifying figure depicted as a mighty eyeball wreathed in perpetually emanating fire that commands bloodthirsty monsters and tortures and cages trespassing fools. Endless courage and determination are major themes and Bard is an amazing role model. And don't forget the innocent and adorable romance between Kili and the impossibly gorgeous Tauriel.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

PikeaxMar 9, 2019

This is based on the trilogy as a whole.
The Hobbit is a wonderful book but it simply doesn't have enough content to be spread between three movies. Each movie doesn't really tell a cohesive story on its own and while I judged the Lord of theThis is based on the trilogy as a whole.
The Hobbit is a wonderful book but it simply doesn't have enough content to be spread between three movies. Each movie doesn't really tell a cohesive story on its own and while I judged the Lord of the Rings as a whole because it improves an already amazing experience, The Hobbit has to be judged as a whole because the movies make no sense in any other method of viewing. Even still they hit middling at best and never truly great.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018

Read the Hobbit it is unlike the more sophisticated Lord of the Rings trilogy. Well the hobbit is one simplistically written children's book. They did a good job of fleshing out these films and characters from one children's book. Not as epicRead the Hobbit it is unlike the more sophisticated Lord of the Rings trilogy. Well the hobbit is one simplistically written children's book. They did a good job of fleshing out these films and characters from one children's book. Not as epic as LOTR movies, but a darn good try considering the limited and simplistic source material they had to work with.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SaythatDec 11, 2018

The movie is very spectacular. Many scenes do not look plausible (such as why barrels did not sink), but I am charmed with the dragon. This is a paradox because at the same time I am deeply dissatisfied that Bilbo's communications with theThe movie is very spectacular. Many scenes do not look plausible (such as why barrels did not sink), but I am charmed with the dragon. This is a paradox because at the same time I am deeply dissatisfied that Bilbo's communications with the dragon differ from the classic version, and I like the classic variant more.

The movie is slightly long. But it is well done.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ErikTheCriticSep 25, 2018

This sequel improves on the first film's pacing and is a more well-balanced movie as a whole. It is more stirring, exciting and intense, and has perhaps one of the coolest CGI dragons ever put to film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

FilipeNetoApr 29, 2018

This film continues "The Hobbit" trilogy, which is a prequel to "Lord of the Rings". However, after the hard failure of the first film, with obvious CGI exaggerations, miserably basic cinematography and several flaws concerning actors, it wasThis film continues "The Hobbit" trilogy, which is a prequel to "Lord of the Rings". However, after the hard failure of the first film, with obvious CGI exaggerations, miserably basic cinematography and several flaws concerning actors, it was hard to do worse with a millionaire budget. Thus, "Desolation of Smaug" is a general improvement without doing miracles. In this film, the company of Thorin Oakenshield finally reaches the lonely mountain, after some difficulties with the elves and a forced visit to Lake Town. However, increasingly powerful forces maneuver in the shadows and covet the gold of the dwarfs without them knowing.

I can not comment on how Peter Jackson and his team adapt the original material of J.R.R. Tolkien because I never read it. The actors were well. Ian McKellen plays Gandalf without much news to add. Martin Freeman continues to look like a solid Bilbo and plays his part without major flaws, as can be said of Richard Armitage (Thorin). This actor does an excellent performance, showing the gradual change of his character, more and more selfish and insensitive. Orlando Bloom returns to the role of Legolas, heir to the Elven throne, but it seems much more impersonal, mechanical and hard than it was in LOTR. Evangeline Lilly looks excellent as the sensitive Tauriel, just like Lee Pace, flawless in the role of King Thranduil, whom the misfortune of the dwarfs never moves. Smaug, the dragon, is not represented by any actor, its an artificial creation, but its an well thought-out character with a cruel personality, selfish and true hatred of the dwarfs. The action scenes are plentiful but continues to suffer with incompetent cinematography and a lamentable abuse of special effects that make everything artificial, pointless and devoid of emotions. The soundtrack, created by Howard Shore, is powerful, impactful and meets the expectations of the public.

"Smaug's Desolation" is not necessarily bad, it's even better than the first film of the trilogy. But it still looks like a show-movie, full of background noise, impersonal, artificial and unable to reach the audience. The sense of danger, the emotion, all that made "Lord of the Rings" a successful trilogy, has disappeared and only comes at very precise scenes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SirKrustyMar 8, 2018

This is a great movie, Imagine playing a really intense action game, and putting it all in a movie. GO SEE THIS!!!!!!!!!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(87/100)
Stunning CGI and very exciting action sequences. Thrilling end too.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

spacebear1Jan 4, 2018

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is another fantastic film in this amazing franchise. Once again the cinematography is marvelous and all of the characters are fantastic, especially Bilbo, Gandalf the Grey, and the one and only Legolas. IThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is another fantastic film in this amazing franchise. Once again the cinematography is marvelous and all of the characters are fantastic, especially Bilbo, Gandalf the Grey, and the one and only Legolas. I also loved Benedict Cumberbatch as both, the Necromancer and Smaug the dragon. In the end, I love this film even more than the past and I have very little problems with this film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

wiiy71Dec 30, 2017

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Mihael_Prislin0Dec 27, 2017

I enjoyed this one even more that the first one! The best moments were The fight scene with Smaug and the river scene where the Orcs are attacking the fellowship and Tauriel is helping them with Legolas! reat casting choises, excpecialy withI enjoyed this one even more that the first one! The best moments were The fight scene with Smaug and the river scene where the Orcs are attacking the fellowship and Tauriel is helping them with Legolas! reat casting choises, excpecialy with Cumberbatch performing Smaug! The last scene is so tense that I couldn't wait the final chapter to come into theatres!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

NecrophatDec 18, 2017

Amazing, amazing trilogy. Wow, what an add on to Lord of the rings, this entire new trilogy is just adding to the masterpiece that is Middle Earth, a must watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Jack97Dec 16, 2016

Desolation of Smaug improves on An Unexpected Journey's shortcomings. The pacing is much better thus the film never drags, the CGI is mostly excellent but especially Smaug the dragon which is one of the greatest motion-capture/CGI creationsDesolation of Smaug improves on An Unexpected Journey's shortcomings. The pacing is much better thus the film never drags, the CGI is mostly excellent but especially Smaug the dragon which is one of the greatest motion-capture/CGI creations to grace the big screen. On top of all of that the film is very exciting which always helps. Easily the best of The Hobbit trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

CinemaphileJul 29, 2016

Sadly, Walsh, Boyens and Jackson opted to remove most of the interesting materials from Tolkien's heartfelt work in this installment in favor of inserting irrelevant interspecies love stories, pointless politics and endless, shiny CGSadly, Walsh, Boyens and Jackson opted to remove most of the interesting materials from Tolkien's heartfelt work in this installment in favor of inserting irrelevant interspecies love stories, pointless politics and endless, shiny CG violence. The desolation of this installment is the lack of growth of the film's protagonist, who is relegated to supporting player and foil for a visually impressive, but soulless CGI dragon. The crux of this film's problem lies in the decision of Jackson, Warner Brothers, New Line and MGM in turning a two-picture-at-best story into a generic action film which appeals to a broader demographic. The collaborators' decision to include appendix material isn't the problem - it provides welcome explanations for Gandalf's seemingly fairweather loyalty to the party. The problem is that new materials, specifically the romance and the politics are mundane and hamfisted. Much of the wonder of An Unexpected Journey and The Fellowship of the Ring are missing from The Desolation of Smaug. The accessibility of Tolkein's The Hobbit lies in the fact that it is a first person narrative. Unfortunately, due to the deep cynicism of the entertainment industry, in an effort to emulate other action film franchises, it has produced another generic e-ticket ride to nowhere.

Skip the full ticket price showing of this flick, catch a matinee and only pay extra for 3D if that's your thing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

SpangleApr 20, 2016

Overstuffed and packed to the brim with logic holes, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug spends too much time trying to add onto its already bloated storyline with side plots and side journeys in an attempt to extend one book into threeOverstuffed and packed to the brim with logic holes, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug spends too much time trying to add onto its already bloated storyline with side plots and side journeys in an attempt to extend one book into three movies. From what I understand, Legolas was not in the book and this is made abundantly clear here when all of his scenes literally add nothing to the movie and the adventures of the dwarves or Gandalf. Heck, even Gandalf's side journey (which is in the book) adds nothing here to this story. It just serves as distraction from what the movie is allegedly building up to, only to then cut off and not do anything until the third movie. Film is not television. Cliff hangers should not be allowed like this. In film, it makes the product feel entirely unfinished and prevents the film from being able to standalone from the rest of the franchise. Instead, The Desolation of Smaug willingly plays in the problems faced by many middle entry stories in that it is neither the beginning or the end. Even worse, the film repeatedly does shoutouts to Lord of the Rings. Again, I know it is a prequel, but I also know that every little shoutout it does is not in the book. More than anything, these moments feel as though they are simply trying to garner goodwill based on the success of the Lord of the Rings films. Unfortunately for Desolation of Smaug, this does not work and the end product is simply a thoroughly average film that may entertain at times, but has serious pacing issues and drags from beginning to end.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

aadityamudharApr 18, 2016

Improvement in drama & action over the prior film. Cool new characters.
Great fight sequences, particularly the barrels set-piece.
My only complaint would be there's some odd pacing at times.
Overall much better than an unexpected journey.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

gameguardian21Mar 20, 2016

This sequel remains better than the first. While it stile isn't close to being good as the lord of the rings, this still offers some entertaining moments, and action that kept me interested.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

nahtan1244Mar 12, 2016

A improvement over a very good first movie. Here the pacing issues have been mostly fixed martin freeman shines once again as the titular hobbit. This movie is much faster paced and darker than the first. We finally get to see smaug who isA improvement over a very good first movie. Here the pacing issues have been mostly fixed martin freeman shines once again as the titular hobbit. This movie is much faster paced and darker than the first. We finally get to see smaug who is terrifically voiced by Benedict cumberbatch. He and our hero exchange some clever word play. We get introduced to legleos more nods to the previous lord of the rings movies. We also get introduced to a new cast member and her name is tourial and she is a bad ass. With it's pacing issues mostly fixed i found The love story stupid and unnecessary also the laketown politics should have been cut down significantly. The fact that some of the characters in laketown were annoying ahem Alfred did not help either. Other than that The second movie returns with what you love elves, wizards men legeos giant spider battles the necromancer and a brilliant finale battle with smaug the terrible. This movie is a bit of a improvement over the first but with an unnecessary love story and laketown politics that seem to drag on forever keeps this movie from being great.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeJan 26, 2016

Aw, did 2013 had to end so early? Why, 2013? You'll never see 2013 ever again; however, you can see this movie a whole load of times if you want to. The Desolation of Smaug feels like an improvement critics say and it feels like a decreaseAw, did 2013 had to end so early? Why, 2013? You'll never see 2013 ever again; however, you can see this movie a whole load of times if you want to. The Desolation of Smaug feels like an improvement critics say and it feels like a decrease from users. I say it still look the same.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

JosephFret14Jan 11, 2016

A visually stunning sequel that includes some very intense scenes, mind blowing visuals and a story that has so much wonder and mystery you can't get it out of your head. Another fantastic movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

potatoes351Nov 22, 2015

Peter Jackson's 2nd part in his trilogy of films based around The Hobbit and extended Lord of the Rings fiction is considered by many to be the highlight of the prequel trilogy, whilst this rings true for some sequences of Desolation ofPeter Jackson's 2nd part in his trilogy of films based around The Hobbit and extended Lord of the Rings fiction is considered by many to be the highlight of the prequel trilogy, whilst this rings true for some sequences of Desolation of Smaug, the product as a whole is on par with An Unexpected Journey in many respects.
Continuing the story of Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman) as he, Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen) and a band of dwarves travel across Middle Earth to reach the Lonely Mountain, a former dwarven city that 60 years previous had been claimed by a dragon called Smaug. Now with the mountain in sight, the journey begins it's final stages as the group of travellers travel through enchanted forests, elf & human settlements and ultimately come face to face with Smaug (Benedict Cumberbatch) himself.
The Desolation of Smaug is easy to summarise in one sentence; great opening, solid ending, wobbly middle. DoS opens with an action scene closely followed by a tense and mind bending scene set in an enchanted forest, however upon arriving at the elven settlement the film takes a nose dive into boredom for over an hour until we eventually reach the Lonely Mountain. Even then, the scenes with Bilbo & Smaug are far greater than the scenes that cut away to show what the rest of the group in either the human settlement or outside the mountain are doing.
Much like An Unexpected Journey, DoS is filmed in 3D and at 48FPS and personally the film uses them to much greater strengths than AUJ ever did. However the problem with crappy CGI is still present in DoS as it was in AUJ. Smaug is the exception to this statement however, being one of the most fearsome and highly detailed creatures in the entire Peter Jackson Middle Earth saga.
Desolation of Smaug is a solidly entertaining fantasy action film, though it again fails to meet the expectations set by the Lord of the Rings trilogy and barely surpasses the previous film in terms of quality. Plus was there any point of Legolas in this movie other than to provide pointless fan service and a below average sub-plot with little depth or meaning to the overall story? No...I din't think so.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Th3GreenHorne7Nov 18, 2015

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is the pinnacle of the Hobbit Trilogy and it's early and long climax as Bilbo's journey gets intense very quickly. The color of this film is very dark and grim, and it's tone makes your spine tingling asThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is the pinnacle of the Hobbit Trilogy and it's early and long climax as Bilbo's journey gets intense very quickly. The color of this film is very dark and grim, and it's tone makes your spine tingling as certain things sneaks up on you. The voice acting from Benedict Cumberbatch who voiced Smuag and The Necromancer. The Special effects were really special because I was impressed with the CGI of Smaug. The movie is quite the masterpiece and something i could watch over and over again just for the fun of it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DanBurritoSep 15, 2015

I honestly don't see why people always refer to this as the best. It's got moments and Benedict Cumberbatch makes a good Smaug (same for Freeman as Bilbo) but really I think the third one is better. Not saying this one is bad though. It's aI honestly don't see why people always refer to this as the best. It's got moments and Benedict Cumberbatch makes a good Smaug (same for Freeman as Bilbo) but really I think the third one is better. Not saying this one is bad though. It's a decent enough film. Like the first. I haven't seen any of The Lord of the Rings movies so I don't know how it compares to them but I suppose it might please LOTR fans.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

grandpajoe6191Aug 27, 2015

"The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug" follows on through the first Hobbit film with its creativity, intelligence, and visuals as the movie continues on Peter Jackson and the audience's journey towards reclaiming the home of the Dwarfs from"The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug" follows on through the first Hobbit film with its creativity, intelligence, and visuals as the movie continues on Peter Jackson and the audience's journey towards reclaiming the home of the Dwarfs from the evil Smaug.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

BoogeeFilmGuyAug 9, 2015

Smaug. Bloody Smaug. Smaug looked AMAZING in this. The movie looked amazing. Everything was amazing! Peter Jackson 100% still has it, baby. Definitely a must-see.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DanilSirotkinJul 31, 2015

В августе 2013 я увидел первый трейлер к Хоббиту: Пустоши Смауга (The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug), (название этого фильма я предугадал ещё до того, как узнал официальное). Как и ожидалось, этот трейлер мне очень понравился, и я сталВ августе 2013 я увидел первый трейлер к Хоббиту: Пустоши Смауга (The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug), (название этого фильма я предугадал ещё до того, как узнал официальное). Как и ожидалось, этот трейлер мне очень понравился, и я стал ждать выхода очередного фильма "Дядюшки Джексона" по Толкину. Естественно я ожидал, как и в прошлых картинах, полного перенесения духа Толкина из книг на экран. Осенью вышел второй трейлер, который, конечно, ТОЖЕ мне понравился (а как вы думали?). И я уже полностью удостоверился в идеальности этого фильма. Кстати, книгу я на то время ещё не читал (прочитал я её только в 2014), и не знал, что он довольно сильно будет отличаться от книги. (Поэтому появившиеся в трейлерах Леголас и Тауриэль меня не смутили ("Лего" я даже обрадовался, так как этот персонаж нравился мне в ВК.)) Вышел ещё один ролик (не трейлер, а как бы дополнение, превью, не знаю как сказать), и ДА, да-да-да, он тоже был классным, атмосферным, хорошо поставленным, с отличной музыкой. Да и вообще, все три ролика были дико атмосферными и "Толкиновскими". Итак, в декабре вышел фильм, однако, посмотрел я его только спустя несколько месяцев, и то пиратку, а на экране телевизора примерно через пол года после выхода. Мне всё равно, где смотреть фильм, если он отличный. Но, оказалась ли отличной "Пустошь"? - Не совсем, как бы тяжело мне не было это признавать. Если прошлые фильмы были ШЕДЕВРАЛЬНЫМИ, этот оказался просто ХОРОШИМ. Итак, СЮЖЕТ. - Команда, видимо, уже спустившаяся с Каррока (Джексон не решил показывать спуск с горы) продолжает свой путь. Она ночует в доме оборотня Беорна, добирается до Лихолесья. Гэндальф покидает гномов с хоббитом, и они, уже без него, с трудом преодолевают Великий Лес. Попадают, в качестве пленников, во дворец Трандуила, короля лесных эльфов, сбегают от него на бочках, приплывают в Эсгарот, Озёрный город, потом наконец достигают своей цели - Одинокой горы. Затем следует беседа со Смаугом и его вылет в Озёрный город. КОНЕЦ. Вроде бы, всё по книге, скажете вы. Нет, скажу я вам, - я ведь рассказал только самый основной сюжет, самое главное. На самом деле, фильм просто ИСПЕЩРЁН различными ДОПОЛНЕНИЯМИ, ПЕРСОНАЖАМИ, КОТОРЫХ НЕ БЫЛО В КНИГЕ, НЕНУЖНЫМИ СЮЖЕТНЫМИ ЛИНИЯМИ. Понятно, что без всего этого не получилась бы ТРИЛОГИЯ, а только, максимум, 2 двухчасовых фильма, но так перебарщивать... Я уже не говорю про ненужную любовную линию... (Хотя, сама Тауриэль получилась симпатичная :)) НО, я даже вытерпел бы всё это, если бы в фильме была такая музыка, КАК В ТРЕЙЛЕРЕ и подобная ей. НО, Шор написал довольно красивую, но АБСОЛЮТНО НЕ ПОДХОДЯЩУЮ (в большинстве случаев), по моему мнению, музыку для фильма. К тому же, её здесь СЛИШКОМ много. На эпизоде с Озёрным городом от неё начинают болеть уши -(Правда). Фильм потерял из-за этого всего почти всю свою сказочность. Но нет, он не бездушный, абсолютно! Просто, фильм стал пропитан не духом Толкина, а духом Джексона.-(Он тоже хорош). И лишь в некоторых моментах проскальзывает тот самый дух Толкина. Вообще, Хоббит с дополнениями смотрелся бы неплохо, но это уже перебор... Джексон с женой видимо замечтался и стал слишком много экспериментировать с уже готовым отличным материалом (я имею в виду книгу). Сценарий, видимо, много раз переписывался, и далекооо не только Джексон приложил к нему руку. Тут замешана и его жена, и Дель Торо (который остался в качестве сценариста) и Филиппа Бойенс, и ДАЖЕ АКТЁРЫ и частично съёмочная группа. В итоге - фильм перегружен. Прибавилось экшна. Погоня на бочках хороша. _ Кстати, ещё одна проблема: если в книге гномы просто спокойно плыли по реке в закупоренных бочках, - то в фильме это СУПЕРМЕГАПОГОНЯМЕСИЛОВОСОРКАМИИСЭЛЬФАМИКРУТЫЕСПЕЦЭФФЕКТЫ и тд. Если в книге Бильбо беседует с драконом, а потом он улетает, то в фильме после разговора идёт длиинный эпизод, где ПОГОНЯГНОМОВОТДРАКОНАГНОМОВЗАДРАКОНОМБИТВАСНИМТЕЛЕЖКИПОКАЗЫВАНИЕНАМВНУТРЕННЕГОУСТРОЙСТВАГОРЫИОБЛИВАНИЕДРАКОНАЗОЛОТОМАТАКЖЕДРАЗНИЛКИТОРИНАПООТНОШЕНИЮКДРАКОНУ и тд... Гномов в Эсгароте зачем то разлучают, явно не для того, чтобы показать, что Торин не прочь ради достижения цели пожертвовать близкими (ещё в первом фильме он говорил, что готов принять любого из этих гномов вместо целой армии), а ради намешивания в дальнейшем ряда других персонажей, ВТОМЧИСЛЕДРАКИСОРКАМИЛЕГОЛАСА и дальнейшего развития ЛЮБОВНОЙЛИНИИКИЛИ+ТАУРИЭЛЬ=ДЕГРОДАЦИЯПИТЕРАДЖЕКСОНА. Ну а зачем пролог? Ну что это я, только ругаю и ругаю фильм... Поговорим о его плюсах. Актёры как обычно хороши, кроме медведя-оборотня. Спецэффекты на высоте, правда теперь их слишком много. И, самое большое достоинство этого фильма - это сцена С БАБОЧКАМИ. Боже, КАК ОНА ПРЕКРАСНА. Только ради этого стоит смотреть этот фильм, разумеется, в расширенной версии, ибо она добавляет духа Толкина, и моменты из книги, которые были вырезаны ради вставки боевых сцен в фильм. К сожалению, Хоббит перестал быть шедевральным фильмом, а стал просто хорошим. Но всё равно лучше, чем большинство современных фильмов. 85/100 или 8/10, 4/5, 3/4.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TrilobiteGJul 20, 2015

Ah yes, the best movie out of the Hobbit Trilogy. What an adventure! From start to finish it was just action, action and more incredible action. This movie is better than it's previous because the dialogue (although some of it unnecessary) isAh yes, the best movie out of the Hobbit Trilogy. What an adventure! From start to finish it was just action, action and more incredible action. This movie is better than it's previous because the dialogue (although some of it unnecessary) is cut down magnitudes less than the predecessor. And of course Smaug, what a villain, actually intriguing dialogue with a sinister presence whilst watching it, props to Cumber batch because that was amazing. Best one!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

PeterAlexanderJun 10, 2015

The Desolation of Smaug is a much improved instalment of the Hobbit franchise. The movie adopts a frenetic pace that captures the viewer whilst also exploring welcomed new fantastical themes within Middle Earth. It is clear that Peter JacksonThe Desolation of Smaug is a much improved instalment of the Hobbit franchise. The movie adopts a frenetic pace that captures the viewer whilst also exploring welcomed new fantastical themes within Middle Earth. It is clear that Peter Jackson has taken a much more colourful approach in his story telling of Middle Earth. The film never reaches the emotionally gripping and dark aspects of the Lord of the Rings, and rather takes a more vibrant and fun route. Whilst this provides a great film for the most part, it once again does not live up to the ridiculously high expectations set up by the Lord of the Rings. A good film nevertheless, ending on a painful cliffhanger that sets up the third film expertly.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Iky009Jun 3, 2015

On the first beat a little, but the many fault corrected Serém, plus the second chapter of The Hobbit is fun ... . .

.

.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MovieManiac83Apr 23, 2015

Special effects have always played an important role in Peter Jackson's adaptations of J.R.R. Tolkien's books but, with The Desolation of Smaug, the middle chapter of The Hobbit movie trilogy, they take center stage. This isn't necessarily aSpecial effects have always played an important role in Peter Jackson's adaptations of J.R.R. Tolkien's books but, with The Desolation of Smaug, the middle chapter of The Hobbit movie trilogy, they take center stage. This isn't necessarily a positive development because it comes at the expense of things many film-goers value, like character development and narrative thrust. Filmed and exhibited primarily in 3-D with lengthy computer-created action sequences, The Desolation of Smaug often looks and feels more like a video game than a motion picture. There are things to like about the second Hobbit film - the director's vision of Middle Earth is as beguiling as ever - but the bloating that was a problem with An Unexpected Journey is an even bigger issue here.

The Desolation of Smaug is too long and too visually busy to be loved by any but a die-hard fan. Purists - those who treat Tolkien's written word with Biblical reverence - may be horrified. A lot of the running around that consumes the running time bears no resemblance to anything in the books. Although Jackson doesn't change the core story, he treats it like an outline. Less than 50% of what's on screen during the course of The Desolation of Smaug comes from The Hobbit. The rest is culled from Tolkien's notes and Jackson's imagination.

One evident improvement over An Unexpected Journey relates to pacing. This movie doesn't bog down the way the previous one did. It shifts from one action sequence to the next, sometimes without taking time to breathe. Unfortunately, Jackson's overreliance on computer-generated imagery during many of these high-octane sequences diminishes the experience. Action works best when there's an identification with the characters and a real sense of danger. Those elements are absent here. Many of The Desolation of Smaug's high profile sequences feel either like elaborate video game cut-scenes or templates for an amusement ride. An example is the barrel escape, which feels like a hyper-real animated sequence. By spending so much time extending action sequences (there's one in the bowels of The Lonely Mountain that lasts for 30 minutes), Jackson is forced to end the film on a cliffhanger. It's an awkward stopping point that may anger some viewers.

Admittedly, the dragon looks great - quite an achievement, especially when seen in its full glory on the big screen. Benedict Cumberbatch provides Smaug's voice (giving him an opportunity to interact with Sherlock co-star Martin Freeman) with appropriate gravitas. Still, what was a high point becomes distended for no purpose other than to highlight the technical proficiency of the special effects wizards. The movie's look is odd; color is so desaturated during the second half that there are times when The Desolation of Smaug appears monochromatic. And Howard Shore's normally praiseworthy score is disappointingly flat.

Fans of The Lord of the Rings will welcome the return of Legolas (Orlando Bloom). Although he is not mentioned by name in Tolkien's book, this is an example of effective artistic license. The same can be said of the inclusion of Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly), a creation of screenwriters Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, and Peter Jackson. Tauriel at least gives The Desolation of Smaug a female presence and her character arc, limited though it may be, is intriguing. The best new addition to The Desolation of Smaug is Bard the Lake Town hero (Luke Evans), whose story has been expanded beyond the one provided by Tolkien.

As spectacles go, The Desolation of Smaug delivers, at least in its ability to provide eye candy. It fails to excite on a deeper level, however, lacking the emotional impact delivered by The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King. It's epic fantasy for those who thinks the term means monsters, chases, fights, and little else. One can argue that it's unfair to judge the middle chapter of a trilogy until all three volumes are available, but Jackson hasn't done an especially good job of making The Desolation of Smaug work as a stand-alone project. Like the dragon's treasure hoard, it's pretty and vast but lacking in substance.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Soma9840Apr 16, 2015

Peter Jackson, you are so amazing. You are the greatest director in the history of ever. Having loved the first movie so much, I was super excited to see this sequel. And it did not disappoint. Better music! Better special effects! (I didn'tPeter Jackson, you are so amazing. You are the greatest director in the history of ever. Having loved the first movie so much, I was super excited to see this sequel. And it did not disappoint. Better music! Better special effects! (I didn't think it was possible!) Better everything! And to top it all off... Smaug. Freaking Smaug. He's just what you think of when you think of big, scary dragon. And his freaking voice! And new locations were also great! Thranduil's Kingdom! Laketown! EREBOR!!! This is my favorite movie. Of all time. Seriously.

What's that? Favorite character, you ask? I have a couple: EVERYBODY. (Except Alfrid.)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

PfenderStrat621Apr 2, 2015

Oh god! This movie is a giant piece of s**t. Out of the three Hobbit movies this is by far the most awkward, poorly-written, inconsistent, ridiculous, unbearable, and boring of these. Every scene, dialogue and plot devices felt like i wasOh god! This movie is a giant piece of s**t. Out of the three Hobbit movies this is by far the most awkward, poorly-written, inconsistent, ridiculous, unbearable, and boring of these. Every scene, dialogue and plot devices felt like i was watching Peter Jackson screaming that he needs money. It was made in such an uninspiring and sloppy way that made it hilarious and at the same time obnoxious. The Hobbit franchise is a giant failure, and this one is the worst of them.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

MiawMixMar 25, 2015

I love the first movie, i think the story is exciting and the craracter are charming. But everything good about the first movie vanished here. There're certain two characters (i call them Gary Stu couple) clearly doesn't belong in this story.I love the first movie, i think the story is exciting and the craracter are charming. But everything good about the first movie vanished here. There're certain two characters (i call them Gary Stu couple) clearly doesn't belong in this story. They fell really out of place, and the worst thing they change my view about the main character group. They make what is a reckless brave warrior before in to a bunch of incompetent melancholic midget. My other complain is the pace, it feel really streched in the most part of the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

homer4presidentMar 11, 2015

The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug is a great movie I recommend to fans of the LOTR and avid readers of Tolkien in general. Unlike the first addition in this trilogy, Desolation of Smaug is fast paced and brimming with action almost to the pointThe Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug is a great movie I recommend to fans of the LOTR and avid readers of Tolkien in general. Unlike the first addition in this trilogy, Desolation of Smaug is fast paced and brimming with action almost to the point of being busy. There are some parts where CGI is not as good as it could be, but upon seeing the dragon Smaug, you soon realize that it was worth it all along.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

emlugo123Feb 22, 2015

No doubt the best out of the 3 Hobbit movies that were released. Smaug's voice was intimidating and was done perfectly by Benedict Cumberbatch. The pace of the movie was vastly improved from the last movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

A1K4PWN3DJan 29, 2015

More action than the first, but not as much as the third, The Desolation of Smaug is the best kind of movie for a trilogy like this. It is a nice bridge between movies, that also has it's important moments in the timeline of the book. PlusMore action than the first, but not as much as the third, The Desolation of Smaug is the best kind of movie for a trilogy like this. It is a nice bridge between movies, that also has it's important moments in the timeline of the book. Plus seeing Orlando Bloom as Legolas again, was just a cherry on top the sundae.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

imthenoobJan 27, 2015

The extended edition really did this one justice. Added so much more content, Built on a lot more to the story. It made a lot more of a satisfying movie than the original version of it. It's such a major step up from the first one. StillThe extended edition really did this one justice. Added so much more content, Built on a lot more to the story. It made a lot more of a satisfying movie than the original version of it. It's such a major step up from the first one. Still relies a bit too heavy on CGI but I can deal with it thanks to the improvement in the dialogue.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

6

johnbobs1Jan 16, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Peter Jackson adaptations of Tolkien's Middle Earth books have always made epic viewing, even if often receiving mixed reviews from Tolkien enthusiasts and film critics alike. The Desolation of Smaug is no different, and in this aspect, I guess no one expected it to be.
It has all the plus points of it's Peter jackson siblings; Stunning and atmospheric scenery and backdrops, generally strong character acting, interesting story and depth. But it also has all the minus points of the previous films; Added and often irrelevant storylines and characters, poor scripting in some scenes and over the top CGI, not to mention a few hammy attempts at humour thrown in for bad measure.
Unfortunately, Jackson seems to have expanded on the negatives rather than the positives in this film.
The plot now deviates hugely from the original works of Tolkien in places; so much so that it is difficult to regard this as an adaptation, more a Jackson interpretation. We also have characters such as Legolas taking up a lot of screen time and stealing scenes, when they were barely mentioned in the book.
Tauriel is an example of a character who has been entirely created for the purposes of the film. Needless to say, as a character she doesn't work and the scenes involving her are needless additions to the plot.
One of the film's major triumphs is it's recreation of Smaug; Brilliantly animated, menacing and superbly voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch, But even his scenes are someone spoiled when the storyline deviates from the book strongly once again. I could also go into the scenes involving Gandalf and Sauron at Dol Goldur, but I won't. Just to say that although interesting, they also didn't appear in the book....
So that's it then - if you like over the top CGI, daft battle scenes and didn't read the book then you'll love this. Otherwise, it's an entertaining but slightly disappointing stab at the work of a literary genius. I hoped for more from Peter Jackson as a film maker, but didn't necessarily expect it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JohnMasterLJan 4, 2015

La segunda Parte de El Hobbit es espectacular! una obra maestra, supera en todos los aspectos a "un viaje inesperado" con mas acción, mejor desarrollo de la historia y un ritmo cargado de entretenimiento increíble. Bravo de nuevo Jackson.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

oDjentoJan 3, 2015

I'll just do a short review for this. Definitely the best out of the 3, with the best pacing, and more characters getting to do things for themselves and not just being there (like dwarves just standing doing nothing in other films). FramingI'll just do a short review for this. Definitely the best out of the 3, with the best pacing, and more characters getting to do things for themselves and not just being there (like dwarves just standing doing nothing in other films). Framing is a bit off as well (dragon stutters in one shot). The film was great as it had 3 main focus points in the film to distinguish itself nicely: 1st half make the dwarfs the main focus, making a bit more character development, the 2nd half being focused on bilbo and the excellent encounter he has with smaug (favourite scene easily!). Then the sub plot is gandalf going to find out what is happening at Don Guldor. This one was as close as it came to the LOTR trilogy, but still just missed it's quality. A slightly darker tone than the previous film and just overall made far better. In retrospect, they could've done this trilogy in two films to miss out all the bull **** they have!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

WheelzFourReelzDec 29, 2014

It definitely goes a little too over the top, but The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is a very fun, fast paced, fantasy movie with one of the coolest movie dragons ever.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Le__XenomorphDec 28, 2014

The Desolation of Smaug is the second entry in the Hobbit trilogy. This movie managed to be way more impressive than the first one and had awesome visuals and action scenes. Especially the final act. This movie is a fine example of a hugeThe Desolation of Smaug is the second entry in the Hobbit trilogy. This movie managed to be way more impressive than the first one and had awesome visuals and action scenes. Especially the final act. This movie is a fine example of a huge improvement. 9/10 (Awesome)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

THEkerimbankaDec 17, 2014

What an exciting improvement upon the first instalment. A fabulous dragon (both in look and voice) that frightens as much as it excites. As usual the acting from the three main leads, McKellen, Ermitage, and Freeman is superb.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

callumjsouthDec 13, 2014

An Unexpected Journey eased us into the story of Bilbo Baggins which did have merits. The Desolation of Smaug takes a different path and throws us in amongst it all, which makes it a more significant and more entertaining chapter. The questAn Unexpected Journey eased us into the story of Bilbo Baggins which did have merits. The Desolation of Smaug takes a different path and throws us in amongst it all, which makes it a more significant and more entertaining chapter. The quest to the Lonely Mountain continues and concludes in epic fashion. The story is breathlessly told just as any great fantasy story should be. The lack of quantitative source material begins to become a positive in the second instalment, as the film feels well paced and appropriately long. The pacing of the film allows it to flow well which enhances the story's presentation. As a result, the plot never feels stop-go or overly congested like the LOTR trilogy did. Nor does it feel too bare like An Unexpected Journey. The Desolation of Smaug is home to well paced plot development, many strong characters and ever present danger which is complimented by some very convincing antagonists. All of which allow for a thoroughly entertaining and impressively compelling film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheApplegnomeDec 9, 2014

This second installment of The Hobbit is greater in almost every aspect. Unfortunately that does not include CGI.

This is the second installment of the new trilogy in our beloved Middle-earth. It quite spectacular when you see the extendedThis second installment of The Hobbit is greater in almost every aspect. Unfortunately that does not include CGI.

This is the second installment of the new trilogy in our beloved Middle-earth. It quite spectacular when you see the extended version, and you realize how big the franchise really is. It got so much extra material and things that really connect all the Middle-earth films together. The biggest thing with this movie is that it got much more action than in An Unexpected Journey, especially when it comes to Smaug and “The Necromancer”. Some of the action sequences though, are boring. There’s just nothing unique with them. But there are much more unique and epic scenes, that I can tell you! Therefor it feels much more like Lord of the Rings. The plot is very entertaining and last act of the film is superb. You really want to see the continuation. The characters in The Desolation of Smaug are very good, and combined with an awesome cast like in An unexpected Journey: do I really have high expectations of The Battle of The five Armies. But the thing with this trilogy is that the CGI is very odd. In this film are the CGI very good when it comes to Orcs and Smaug. But at the same time is there much terrible and awful CGI when it comes to natural objects. It didn’t feel real at all. There’s also a big mix of CGI and real recorded scenes. They aren’t working well together. There are much dark scenes; witch didn't work well while using 3D-glasses. The computer-generated light that’s included in some parts in the movie is also terrible.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is much better than the previous film in this new trilogy. The action is greater, better music and a lot more LotR-feeling. But the movie is a bit slow at some places, and the CGI are just terrible sometimes.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug gets an 8/10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

joao1198pedroNov 27, 2014

People say this movie is much better than the first one, i badly disagree with that, because this movie is the most useless in the franchise so i hope they fix the next one with most useful stuffs.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

BlaccyNov 22, 2014

Taken me somewhere I have never been before! i love it. Peter Jackson just took me on a journey through unreality and it blew me away! If this isn't the best movie of 2013 i don't know what is. CANNOT WAIT FOR BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES !

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

thomasljoguesNov 13, 2014

For those who do not read the Tolkien books, this is a great movie and a must watch. It is an epic fantasy and filled with many mythological themes. However, to those who are familiar with the Opuses of Tolkien that even surpass the OcarinaFor those who do not read the Tolkien books, this is a great movie and a must watch. It is an epic fantasy and filled with many mythological themes. However, to those who are familiar with the Opuses of Tolkien that even surpass the Ocarina of Time, this is excruciatingly painful to watch. Unfortunately, I fell in the second category, believing this to be The Desecration of Smaug.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

vikesh2206Nov 9, 2014

Desolation of Smaug corrects the pacing issue that plagued the first installment and despite its lengthy runtime, still provides fascinating visuals, delivers the sense of adventure and sets things up nicely for the final movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

DannyGNov 8, 2014

Milking Tolkien For All He's Worth! See What Happens When Greedy People & Corporations Sink Their Teeth Into A Great Story! Sorry! But I've lost my patience! Watching The Hobbit was quite demoralizing! Unfortunately, The Hobbit has beenMilking Tolkien For All He's Worth! See What Happens When Greedy People & Corporations Sink Their Teeth Into A Great Story! Sorry! But I've lost my patience! Watching The Hobbit was quite demoralizing! Unfortunately, The Hobbit has been turned into a commodity like toothpaste and underarm deodorant! There is ZERO justification for turning the Hobbit into a trilogy, if you are going to drag out the story and do such a poor job. The Tolkien family - who I assume controls the rights to J.R.R. Tolkien's works - should be ashamed of themselves.They could have insisted in putting the story first instead of letting director Jackson create such a vapid and mediocre second Hobbit film. It's really quite sad! How can a director who made 3 masterpieces out of Lord of the Rings stoop so low and turn The Hobbit into something so trite and empty that, at times, it's like watching a Saturday morning breakfast cereal commercial on T.V.?

I badly wanted to like this movie. At least the first movie of The Hobbit trilogy had some interesting moments despite its many flaws. But now the Hobbit has been turned into a cartoon with mostly boring two-dimensional, cardboard characters. The acting was so poor at times it ruined the illusion. But worst of all, there's very little heart, unlike the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which is the epitome of passion and adventure and good storytelling.

I also think part of the problem is that director Jackson is trying to turn The Hobbit into another The Lord of the Rings, which is quite stupid. They are very different stories. From what I have read, Tolkien wrote The Hobbit essentially for fun and wasn't even going to have it published until his friend, the great writer, C. S. Lewis convinced him otherwise. The Tolkien family should have went with a different director. Since when does one man own a storytelling giant like Tolkien?

Then I was forced to watch this awful movie in 3D or drive elsewhere. I noticed about 30 seconds of special 3D affects. How can that be called a 3D movie? I call it a rip-off and I wish the Federal government would call such a claim fraud, so filmmakers would think twice about ripping off the public!

Hollywood pulled the same stretching-out-the-story-stunt with Harry Potter, but at least I was smart enough to never have watched the last film. I eventually became so disgusted, I could care less what happened to Harry Potter. The same storytelling destruction non-sense has now captured the Hobbit. When I started hoping that Smaug would snap Bilbo Baggins and the King of the Dwarfs in a half, I realized I'm now done with all things Hobbit movie related!!… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

SythusRATINGSOct 19, 2014

Thorin and company have reached Lake-town and it is time for the hobbit Bilbo Baggins to fulfill his contract with the dwarves. The party must complete the journey to Lonely Mountain and burglar Baggins must seek out the Secret Door that willThorin and company have reached Lake-town and it is time for the hobbit Bilbo Baggins to fulfill his contract with the dwarves. The party must complete the journey to Lonely Mountain and burglar Baggins must seek out the Secret Door that will give them access to the hoard of the dragon Smaug. If Bilbo and the others are able to gain the treasure, will they be able to keep it? And will they discover what has become of the wizard Gandalf?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

pierremSep 28, 2014

This film is as good as "Attack of the killer tomatoes". The plot is as near to The Hobbit as Killer Tomatoes is to pizza making; the action scenes are just as laughable (yet higher technical quality). If Jackson had come to Tolkien's tombThis film is as good as "Attack of the killer tomatoes". The plot is as near to The Hobbit as Killer Tomatoes is to pizza making; the action scenes are just as laughable (yet higher technical quality). If Jackson had come to Tolkien's tomb and shat inside, it would be less of an insult to his memory.
As a comic film, it could be good. I really laughed when I saw a hobbit on a metal plate surfing over molten gold. He's made of asbestos!… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

8

horcrux2007Sep 26, 2014

Not surprisingly, "Desolation of Smaug" is exponentially better than its shaky predecessor, "An Unexpected Journey". Every scene is exciting and entertaining, and the visual effects are absolutely amazing; Smaug looked especially visuallyNot surprisingly, "Desolation of Smaug" is exponentially better than its shaky predecessor, "An Unexpected Journey". Every scene is exciting and entertaining, and the visual effects are absolutely amazing; Smaug looked especially visually beautiful. The one problem this film had was that it condensed the best chapters in the book to just a few minutes such as the spider attack scene.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

beingryanjudeSep 3, 2014

I'll admit being one of the first to criticize stretching The Hobbit into thirds. That would mean this middle chapter was complete rubbish. The Desolation of Smaug is both an achievement on its own as well as a bridge into the final installment.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

BshopAug 16, 2014

Better than the first one by a long shot. I enjoyed every scene, except the ones with the Bard (who seems mild-mannered and not too leader-esque) and the barrel-river scene (which also was a bit long and somewhat ridiculous), but I digress.Better than the first one by a long shot. I enjoyed every scene, except the ones with the Bard (who seems mild-mannered and not too leader-esque) and the barrel-river scene (which also was a bit long and somewhat ridiculous), but I digress.
From Lonely Mountain on it was a great show indeed. Can't wait for the Battle of Five Armies.
In summary, rent if you can. Buy if you like the LOTR and Peter Jackson/Tolkien series thus far. 3D not really worth the price honestly.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

adpirtleAug 15, 2014

The second film in this trilogy dispenses with the relative reverence of the first, and that turns out to be a good thing. Its predecessor suffered a bit because it couldn't decide whether it wanted to be a scene-for-scene retelling of theThe second film in this trilogy dispenses with the relative reverence of the first, and that turns out to be a good thing. Its predecessor suffered a bit because it couldn't decide whether it wanted to be a scene-for-scene retelling of the novel or a looser, action-oriented adaptation. This film resides firmly in the second camp, and everything works better for it. For example, the escape from the Woodland Realm is every bit as over the top as the last film's escape from Goblin-town, but it doesn't feel so out of place, so it's easier just to kick back and enjoy the ride. The changes from the book once again mostly work, and in this case actually make more sense. Bard the Bargeman might not be as awesome as Bard the Bowman, at least not yet, but he is much more fleshed out, and the film finally gives the Company a decent reason for needing a burglar. I could have done without the dwarf-dragon battle at the end, I really liked the addition of Tauriel.

My biggest objection continues to be the over-reliance on CGI. Make no mistake, the Smaug of the title is every bit as incredible as I ever imagined he could be, but decision to animate Azog's son doesn't work out so well. I understand that it was a late decision to give what was originally a live performance a computer makeover, and it shows in how unrealistic he looks next to Daddy.

Overall, this is another fine addition to Jackson's Middle-earth saga, expanding on the previous film while avoiding its pacing pitfalls.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Nick114Aug 7, 2014

Excellent movie Series..!! thanks a lot for making an extra ordinary movie :) you have really worked hard as well as amazing. hope to watch an unfinished tale as well.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

HarmonicAug 6, 2014

There was a great cast : Ian McKellen ! Martin Freeman ! Richard Armitage!
Peter Jackson was the director of The Lord of the Rings ; King Kong ; Lovely Bones...
There was an amazing composer for the soundtrack : Howard Shore... So ? WhatThere was a great cast : Ian McKellen ! Martin Freeman ! Richard Armitage!
Peter Jackson was the director of The Lord of the Rings ; King Kong ; Lovely Bones...
There was an amazing composer for the soundtrack : Howard Shore...

So ? What happened ? The 3D is useless, the picture is often illegible. The set smells the green screen and the numeric with full nose. And, I know a movie can be brilliant without respecting the work of origin but : Legolas ? Seriously ? What the hell is he doing there if it's not to make a useless allusion to Lord of the Rings...
To my mind, here is that is that movie : a far too long useless allusion to Lord of the Rings, a work which suffered from the Peter Jackson's numerical megalomania for, in the final, a result close to the disgusting.
Without forgetting the useless sub-plots added to the screenplay (an emancipation towards the book, okay, why not, but from there to change all the weft it...) ; some strokes of humour which completely fall flat ; the completely ridiculous look of the dwarfs and, naturally, unspeakable campaign of communication and advertisement made around films (planes, immense sculptures in stations and.), amounting to a degree of nonsense which exceeds the imagination !!
In brief : Much Ado About Nothing !… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Tessara_VejganAug 4, 2014

And I thought the first one was boring, well, this sequel is worse. There is almost nothing going on for the most of the movie. The effects are great, beautiful environments and all that but it doesn't matter since the story is booooooring.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

yanks45a1Jul 17, 2014

I enjoyed The Hobbit II much better than the first film. The Hobbit is my favorite book, so Im biased, but It was very enjoyable. The scenes with the dragon are the best. I used to call my ex Smaug behind her back so seeing Smaug in the filmI enjoyed The Hobbit II much better than the first film. The Hobbit is my favorite book, so Im biased, but It was very enjoyable. The scenes with the dragon are the best. I used to call my ex Smaug behind her back so seeing Smaug in the film was special for me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TokyochuchuJul 13, 2014

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is a really awesome LotR movie. It feels significantly fresher than 'An Unexpected Journey' but also retains that films delightful fairy-tale edge. And Smaug himself was a fantastic creation. More please!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MagicManRAWJun 30, 2014

I don't know if I am just getting used to the storyline of Middle Earth, because this one seemed a bit tired with that been there done that theme. I take away one point. Largely a very entertaining film and large quality. Love all the newI don't know if I am just getting used to the storyline of Middle Earth, because this one seemed a bit tired with that been there done that theme. I take away one point. Largely a very entertaining film and large quality. Love all the new elements not in the book. I cant wait for the third one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

TheSquirrelJun 27, 2014

I try not to rate anything too low, because thing has to be something that you point to and say, "This was good, right?"
Wrong, because The Desolation of Smaug was horrible start to finish. Where The Hobbit was a slap in the face toI try not to rate anything too low, because thing has to be something that you point to and say, "This was good, right?"
Wrong, because The Desolation of Smaug was horrible start to finish. Where The Hobbit was a slap in the face to Tolkien, TDoS was a burning bag of crap left at his doorstep. I went into this movie with low expectations and only 15 minutes in realized that even so I had expected too much.

First, why it's not a good movie:
They do a very poor job of portraying the time frame of this movie and by you end you think to yourself, "Oh, they were only three days from the mountain including jail time, I wonder why they make this out to be such an undertaking?" because in the book they took Months!
The Characters are impossible to relate to as each one has not had a proper time frame to develop, so you end up with a cast of 15 or so completely forgettable characters.
This movie is essentially four staged areas with nothing in between and ends up feeling like a cobbled together selection of short stories that don't connect properly.
Wacky Willys Barrel ride down the river scene is one of the worst displays of directing excess I have seen since Micheal Bays Transformer movies.
The script is poor/rushed with no memorable conversations or lines in two and half hours of run time.

Second, why it's a horrible adaptation:
Significant, memorable scenes from the book (the introduction of the dwarves to Beorn, the pursuit of the Elven feasts in the forest, the true ending to Bilbo's conversation with Smaug) have been replaced with horrible scens that aren't in the book (Filli chatting up Elven lady in Dungeon, Orcs attacking Laketown, Dwarves battling Smaug).
The ring, which was asleep in the book and had no effect on characters apart from turning Bilbo invisible, is now awake and wrecking Bilbo. Add to that every evil character in the movie basically proclaiming the coming of Sauron even though it's supposed to be a secret. Anyone with even a cursory knowledge of the Tolkien universe would know that this is completely incorrect and creates continuity issues. Why does Sauron not sense the ring is in the forest right beside him? Why does his eye not appear when Bilbo puts on the ring? Why do elves and men not react appropriately knowing that Sauron is back but not at full strength?
Upon close examination, not a single scene or event has been left unaltered from the book which means that this movie is not an adaptation, but rather some loose tribute using similar characters and settings but retaining nothing of the original.

I give the one for the excellent casting of Cumberbatch as Smaug as well as the CG on the dragon. (The rest of the scene is complete garbage as the idea of the Dragon sensing the ring and Bilbo removing it is a complete deviation.)

Save yourself from this and just rent the Trilogy again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

jacob4Jun 23, 2014

The movie was epic, adventurous, funny, and enjoyable. An absolute must see. I can't wait for the last Hobbit movie to come out. But after the third Hobbit movie, this will probably be the last live action adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien'sThe movie was epic, adventurous, funny, and enjoyable. An absolute must see. I can't wait for the last Hobbit movie to come out. But after the third Hobbit movie, this will probably be the last live action adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien's works. Unless Peter Jackson finds another work by J.R.R. Tolkien and makes it into a movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DarthPreampJun 23, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Fairly awful treatment of Tolkien's work. Why did Jackson add so many stupid things? I mean, a love affair between a dwarf and an elf? C"MON!!! If he'd done it in a way that was mature it still would have been barely acceptable, but the mediocre and degradingly juvenile way in which he did it here was really in low taste. Then there is the giant dwarf statue made of molten gold? Huh? No really, simply awful. I really liked the first movie, this one was really bad.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

IntroduceJun 15, 2014

The Hobbit: The Desolation of....whatever.
The final result of a trilogy dying on it's knees,
Who really ever never cared about a hobbit enough to devote 3 films
to there kind,

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

9

bradtheman123Jun 12, 2014

I don't understand how this got a bad metascore. I think this was better than the first because it was full of so much action and suspense. Not only was it almost just like the book but it actually portrayed it. The best part was by far whenI don't understand how this got a bad metascore. I think this was better than the first because it was full of so much action and suspense. Not only was it almost just like the book but it actually portrayed it. The best part was by far when he was in the palace with all the gold and treasure trying to find the special crystal. Then when the dragon woke up and it was learking around looking for him, it was talking to him saying things like, "I can smell you", and "Come out come out wherever you are." And at that point it just had so much suspense and actually wowed me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

dharmaMay 30, 2014

Still a cash grab in my opinion, but a well made one. Of course, the dragon delivers with great effects and all, but the pacing is off and it moves too slow, until the next exciting set pieces that is.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

thehawkMay 21, 2014

I knew before seeing the film that it would take a different direction to the book. This didn't worry me at all. However once the party of dwarves left Beorn's house, this film disintegrated into nonsense. The Smaug scenes involving theI knew before seeing the film that it would take a different direction to the book. This didn't worry me at all. However once the party of dwarves left Beorn's house, this film disintegrated into nonsense. The Smaug scenes involving the dwarves, the elf-dwarf love story, all of Lake Town and Bard, the stupid orc-elf fight at the river were all pitiful. The film dragged on way too long. I just hope the third film has realistic battle scenes e.g. something like Romans vs German tribes the start of Gladiator. Warhammer-esque dwarves make my brain hurt. The Moria Gimli dressed in 20th Century German soldier harness would be preferable, please.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Ayrton25May 21, 2014

It was a good movie. I enjoyed it a lot and liked the fact that peter Jackson brought back legolas. I liked the changes from the book to the movie and disliked some, I admire the way they designed smaug.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

Rawr_CriticsaurMay 17, 2014

God the movie was so damn bad.Having read the book i can tell you first hand that the director and the writers did not even read the book.Half the sruff did not happen.Legolas?Not there.Gandalf side story?Not there.Kili romance withGod the movie was so damn bad.Having read the book i can tell you first hand that the director and the writers did not even read the book.Half the sruff did not happen.Legolas?Not there.Gandalf side story?Not there.Kili romance with tauriel?No no no no.The dwarves trying to kill smaug the way drogo killed viserys?COME ON THE PEOPLE ARENT EVEN TRYING

And let's skip how they ruined the mirkwood scene...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

vlahoponMay 16, 2014

Good movie but still far away from LOTR . Benedict Cumberbatch is amazing as Smaug's voice . The only problem with this movie is the elf-dwarf love story

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

TheQuietGamerMay 7, 2014

The tales of Middle Earth continue, with all the spectacle and epic moments we have come to expect from the Peter Jackson movies. It's a huge improvement over the already great first movie. The characters are just as enjoyable as always, andThe tales of Middle Earth continue, with all the spectacle and epic moments we have come to expect from the Peter Jackson movies. It's a huge improvement over the already great first movie. The characters are just as enjoyable as always, and the story does an excellent job of providing it's own story whilst showing us events that lead up to the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Overall I was blown away. I only have one minor complaint, and that is that the over-the-top action and goofy moments this movie provides is at odds with what I have come to expect from the Tolkien universe. It's not bad, it's just that some times it can feel out of place. Still this is one excellent movie, and one that any Middle Earth fan will love. I do recommend that newcomers experience the first Hobbit before jumping into this one though. I give the movie a near-perfect score of 9.9/10.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

psyberdelicMay 7, 2014

A whole lot of extra and, IMHO, unnecessary stuff to get three films out of one short book... However, worth $1.26 at Redbox but somewhat irritating if you loved the book... Too much like Lord of the Rings in tone and substance...

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

JekSpaceyMay 3, 2014

This second chapter devoted to the adventures of Bilbo is clearly our most upbeat and dynamic than the first, which was preparing , instead , only to usher in a land of fairy-tale and a half more joyous than we had seen in "The Lord of theThis second chapter devoted to the adventures of Bilbo is clearly our most upbeat and dynamic than the first, which was preparing , instead , only to usher in a land of fairy-tale and a half more joyous than we had seen in "The Lord of the Rings ."
In "The Desolation of Smaug ," the fairy-tale atmosphere of the first was slowly dissolved, As the figure of the magician is to emerge in the future Sauron , the symbol of pure evil .
Despite having a script slightly weaker than the first episode , which was almost poetic , is much more convincing in terms of narrative and this time the scenes and additional characters are not at all out of place.
Doubled the action scenes , the fights ( some a little ' forced I admit) , but above all the characters, the story has not in fact a single thread as in the first chapter , but it follows the fortunes of different groups of characters .
Although this film has taken a little 'space Bilbo , who was the protagonist in the first , this new feature has helped make " The Desolation of Smaug " more like the old timeless Jackson trilogy , which also had a multitude of characters and situations.
A praise is due to the realization of Smaug do it , which is really something fantastic, impressive , magnificent, superior.
In my opinion this movie had all the papers in order to reach the level of the first three masterpieces by Jackson, but unfortunately was hit from the soundtrack (which despite being epic is not remotely comparable to the work done by the old trilogy ) , and the script, which convinces , but not jaw-dropping .
I want to clarify that I have not read the book , so I can not comment on the film at 360 degrees, but the emotions that made me feel while watching were really intense , and at times I felt like I really go back to the first trilogy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

RamonGuerreroMay 1, 2014

This movies tries to deliver us an interesting plot, but turns out to be tedious and slow, with action sequences that fail in entertaining us, or being visually outstanding, and tries to keep us up to the third part by bringing us aThis movies tries to deliver us an interesting plot, but turns out to be tedious and slow, with action sequences that fail in entertaining us, or being visually outstanding, and tries to keep us up to the third part by bringing us a cliffhanger ending.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

ScepticMay 1, 2014

Except for the following;Bilbo,Gandalf,Beorn,Dwarf-names,Spiders,Elf-King,Barrels,Laketown,Bard,Master,Key,Smaug,Arkenstone and a few other words,this disgrace has little to do with the great mans work.For the only time in my entire life,asExcept for the following;Bilbo,Gandalf,Beorn,Dwarf-names,Spiders,Elf-King,Barrels,Laketown,Bard,Master,Key,Smaug,Arkenstone and a few other words,this disgrace has little to do with the great mans work.For the only time in my entire life,as well as millions of others,I'm glad he is dead.This would have surely killed him to see.Pray Hollywood don't get their filthy hands on the Silmarillion...… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

3

TroublewalkingApr 30, 2014

If your not a fan of the Hobbit series, don't waste your time watching this movie. It is by far the worse in the series.

If your a Hardcore Hobbit fan, this movie would have to be rated hypocrisy. This movie takes the way Disney changesIf your not a fan of the Hobbit series, don't waste your time watching this movie. It is by far the worse in the series.

If your a Hardcore Hobbit fan, this movie would have to be rated hypocrisy. This movie takes the way Disney changes stories to something unrecognizable, to whole new levels. Except Disney creates entertaining movies. At least half of the movie, has nothing to do with the actual Hobbit story.

My family and I had to laugh at how absurdly off this movie was. Half of the fun was making up more absurdly inaccurate Hobbit tales. Laughing at Jackson's "Desolation of the Hobbit" tale was the only reason I give this a 3.

The only reason to watch this movie, is because it uses more frame rates than most. This "Historical" factor, has to be the only reason "Movie fans" are rating it highly. However, most won't notice it, unless watching it on an absolutely top of the line system.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

kingabbenApr 21, 2014

First off, as a movie relating to the books, it's terrible; beyond awful. I mean seriously, Legolas and Tauriel (who should not even be there) literally stole the spotlight from Bilbo (keep in mind that the movie is called the HOBBIT), andFirst off, as a movie relating to the books, it's terrible; beyond awful. I mean seriously, Legolas and Tauriel (who should not even be there) literally stole the spotlight from Bilbo (keep in mind that the movie is called the HOBBIT), and further pushed a ultra-cheesy love story with Killi? I mean seriously?!

Second, as a movie itself, it is also awful. The pacing is off once more, and the special effects just make the movie look fake.

Congratulations Peter Jakcosn, aka the new George Lucas, for screwing up the prequels after making a brilliant LOTR Trilogy.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

CaestusApr 21, 2014

Although not bad, i dont get rid of the feeling that peter jackson and co. don´t do the Hobbit movies with the same love and detail like they did the Lord of the Ring Trilogy. This said, Desolation of smaug is not a bad movie

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews