The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

8

NedensoruyorsunDec 28, 2013

Sağlam görsel efektler kullanılmış bence, Yönetmen Peter Jackson yine bütün yeteneklerini bu filmde göstermiş. Özellikle kullanılan Efektler çok iyi kurgulanmış...

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

extremeswagdudeDec 28, 2013

I went into DOS expecting to see more plot and establishing characters and story lines, much like the first one. I was okay with that. And I was surprised on how well done this was. It has those aspects of the first film. But there was muchI went into DOS expecting to see more plot and establishing characters and story lines, much like the first one. I was okay with that. And I was surprised on how well done this was. It has those aspects of the first film. But there was much more. It establishes a love story, that is similar to a forbidden love, and adventure. This adventure takes you to places of Middle Earth you have never seen before. This has much more action, and adventure. It is amazing in 3D/… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

bennya98Dec 28, 2013

I mostly enjoyed the Hobbit and especially the action scenes but I felt it was unnecessarily long and could have been 30 minutes shorter. The main story felt bogged down with side-plots (the Bard and the Elves) and not enough attention wasI mostly enjoyed the Hobbit and especially the action scenes but I felt it was unnecessarily long and could have been 30 minutes shorter. The main story felt bogged down with side-plots (the Bard and the Elves) and not enough attention was paid to the title character. Overall, it was an enjoyable film with impressive CGI effects but should have focused on the most important plot line.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

zwedizhfizhDec 28, 2013

Book inconsistencies alone would have rendered this film a 7, for me it is the low quality CGI in the final fight scenes between Smaug and the Dwarves/Bilbo (maybe the 3D makes it less noticeable? I saw the film in classic 2D, as most viewersBook inconsistencies alone would have rendered this film a 7, for me it is the low quality CGI in the final fight scenes between Smaug and the Dwarves/Bilbo (maybe the 3D makes it less noticeable? I saw the film in classic 2D, as most viewers would at home), the inconsistencies with on-screen action (apparently, the average movie goer can't count barrels correctly), and the consistent mispronunciation of Smaug. It's quite obviously "smog", I don't see why it couldn't be like that in the film. This is similar to the mispronunciation of Aang as "ong" in the Avatar movie, it's wildly noticeable and degrades the experience. Overall, this has to be the weakest film in the series, designed only to make money on sub-par writing and inane extension of the middle bits. I left this film feeling only dread for the fate of the series, though I did find some enjoyment in the added story bits. This and my love of the original films are the only things holding this film from a lower score in my own personal view.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

SeniorMintsDec 27, 2013

I loved the movie. The only negative thing I can say is I didn't like where Jackson ended the second movie. I'm a fan of the book, and I realize that Jackson is going to have to add some stuff that wasn't in the book, but this doesn't takeI loved the movie. The only negative thing I can say is I didn't like where Jackson ended the second movie. I'm a fan of the book, and I realize that Jackson is going to have to add some stuff that wasn't in the book, but this doesn't take anything away from the story.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

GrumpDec 27, 2013

I won't whine and tell you the film was too long, or it was just one long snoozefest, and how I'm not sure if they can make a children story into 3 complex motion pictures... I'll tell you that what this film needs is a stronger script, and aI won't whine and tell you the film was too long, or it was just one long snoozefest, and how I'm not sure if they can make a children story into 3 complex motion pictures... I'll tell you that what this film needs is a stronger script, and a hint of the atmosphere the Lord of the Rings had. I admire how they flawlessly keep your attention for the whole 2 and half hours, and thus making the film more enjoyable, but sometimes after watching it through, you stop and think to yourself: "Wait, so over the last 20 minutes, they essentially accomplished nothing." Thankfully, the movie's flaws are overlooked by terrific performances by almost everyone. (Except a few of the side characters, you'll know what I mean when you see it), and it's strong element of creativity. (Note: following the book is not paticularly a good idea for a movie.) I'd be stunned if you didn't go and enjoy yourself at the second Hobbit film, but like I say, if the original wasn't the next Lord of the Rings, neither is this. (Lord of the Rings never had stupid cliffhangers either.) So go out and enjoy it for what it is.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Skylimit117Dec 27, 2013

We know it's not lord of the rings, but if you think of The Desolation of Smaug as a movie, it's freaking amazing. Much better than anything else I've seen this year. Awesome solid film

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

1

David_HDec 27, 2013

After doing such a nice job with LOTR, its such a sad situation and such a blatant money grab and complete disregard for J.R.R. Tolkien's original prose. The Hobbit was about 1/6th the length of Lord of The Rings, yet the producers chose aAfter doing such a nice job with LOTR, its such a sad situation and such a blatant money grab and complete disregard for J.R.R. Tolkien's original prose. The Hobbit was about 1/6th the length of Lord of The Rings, yet the producers chose a worthless and mind-numbing extension of Hobbit into two ridiculously long movies. The graphics and effects and story was so expansive in LOTR we were willing to allow the division into three films, but for the Hobbit there is absolutely no reason to split it up other than to suck more money out of our wallets.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

JacobDec 26, 2013

The Desolation of Smaug was a movie that promised excitement and epicness but instead what we got was a whole lot of nothing. The story lacks any substances consisting of lots of filler and pointless action which goes on for far too long. TheThe Desolation of Smaug was a movie that promised excitement and epicness but instead what we got was a whole lot of nothing. The story lacks any substances consisting of lots of filler and pointless action which goes on for far too long. The characters are not that interesting or developed. This movie is so focused on flashing CGI and dumb action scenes that it fails to provide any real substance to justify it being three movies. This is a two part movie that should have stayed a two part movie or been one long movie. As it is Peter Jackson has yet to convince me that three 2 hour and 40 minute movies are necessary. If you are a die-hard Lord of the Rings fan check it out but if you want something with substance there is none here. This movie is a whole lot of nothing Bland, forgettable, and excessive filler. It had an entertaining first half but once you realize this movie has nothing to offer in terms of character and story but just mindless action you will be disappointed. I’m probably going to forget about this movie in a couple days, which is shame considering how much potential it had.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Garbouw_DearkDec 26, 2013

So, I never read the book, and I never saw the first movie. Still, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, while a bit rushed at times (despite the length of the movie) was still enjoyable to watch.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

SmauggDec 26, 2013

Peter Jackson's returns to Middle Earth this time with a bang...Dwarves, elves, Hobbits, Sauron, orcs. Movie was heavier in substance than the first part. Smaug's part was astonishing, With impressive CGI and Benedict Cumberbatch's killerPeter Jackson's returns to Middle Earth this time with a bang...Dwarves, elves, Hobbits, Sauron, orcs. Movie was heavier in substance than the first part. Smaug's part was astonishing, With impressive CGI and Benedict Cumberbatch's killer vocals, we watched about 40 minutes of the finest fantasies ever. Martin Freeman did Bilbo's role with top-notch performance and Gandalf is as charming as always...… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

Jbles303Dec 25, 2013

Peter Jackson has done it yet again. If you find yourself uninterested by the movie experience Mr. Jackson continues to create for his viewers, ignore all of that and at least see Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug for the visual effects. YouPeter Jackson has done it yet again. If you find yourself uninterested by the movie experience Mr. Jackson continues to create for his viewers, ignore all of that and at least see Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug for the visual effects. You will not be disappointed.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

HeartanalogDec 25, 2013

Awesome! Not the travel channel version, like the first Hobbit where it could have been just Golum, instead we got hours of sweeping vistas. I got to admit the 3D was very clean, and it payed off when you finally see Smaug! Go see it! Fun forAwesome! Not the travel channel version, like the first Hobbit where it could have been just Golum, instead we got hours of sweeping vistas. I got to admit the 3D was very clean, and it payed off when you finally see Smaug! Go see it! Fun for the whole family!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

WhereDoiStartDec 25, 2013

Hit or miss for many people. However, users claiming the movie will not be enjoyable if you're a fan of the original LOTR trilogy are basically 100% wrong. When did movie watching become a job for people to then criticize to death a person'sHit or miss for many people. However, users claiming the movie will not be enjoyable if you're a fan of the original LOTR trilogy are basically 100% wrong. When did movie watching become a job for people to then criticize to death a person's movie for "flaws" that they perceived? Where is the objective criticism? Enjoy the movie for what it is people.

The acting is great. The CGI is great and, yes, there is a lot of it but I fail to see how this is a bad thing, especially when done so well! The characterization is far better than the first movie and the only aspect that seemed a little unnecessary is the relationship between Tauriel and Kili but it doesn't detract from the movie whatsoever. I've simply come to believe people make it their mission to nit-pick movies. Nevertheless, it is a nearly 3 hour movie that is worth the price of admission, to at least experience or distract yourself with during your free time, more so than the hour and a half movies the industry favors nowadays.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

5

DemoraseDec 25, 2013

Much better than the first one, which was unsalvageable, but the pacing is still atrocious. There's no good reason for this movie to be 2 hours and 40 minutes long, and as a result it hurts the overall experience.

The director shouldn'tMuch better than the first one, which was unsalvageable, but the pacing is still atrocious. There's no good reason for this movie to be 2 hours and 40 minutes long, and as a result it hurts the overall experience.

The director shouldn't force on the audience all this unnecessary material that degrades the overall movie, it should be the director's cut for fans. It's a shame because it could have been an excellent movie without the bloat.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Movie1997Dec 25, 2013

I remember reviewing "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" back in March of this review. It was my very first review on this website. After watching this sequel I got to say, WOW! "The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug" is surprisingly betterI remember reviewing "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" back in March of this review. It was my very first review on this website. After watching this sequel I got to say, WOW! "The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug" is surprisingly better than the first in most ways, even though I loved the first one, the story, the pacing, the action is all just jumped up a notch. It's filled with great performances, especially Benedict Cumberbatch as Smaug! What a great year for that guy! Overall, "The Desolation of Smaug" is a much more action-packed well told better paced middle earth story. The only flaw I had was a little bit of inconsistency! That's it! Other than that, it's one heck of a ride and I can't wait for "The Hobbit: There and Back Again!" I give this epic an A!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

SaltankDec 25, 2013

An absolute feast in IMAX 3D HFR. Vastly more interesting than an Unexpected Journey, seemingly longer and more fast paced, Desolation of Smaug brings fantastic directing with exciting visuals and much better use of HFR. The onlyAn absolute feast in IMAX 3D HFR. Vastly more interesting than an Unexpected Journey, seemingly longer and more fast paced, Desolation of Smaug brings fantastic directing with exciting visuals and much better use of HFR. The only disappointing thing is, I can't get HFR at home when this is released on bluray.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Jack_SunshineDec 24, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There was a time, during the early years of the twenty first century, when each December would herald a new Lord of the Rings (alongside a new Harry Potter film and maybe a Star Wars, if we were lucky). The height of this lasted only as long as the three years over which Peter Jackson’s original trilogy were released, but was already becoming something of a tradition.

With ITV serialising Harry Potter over the Christmas period, and a brand new epic trilogy in the Hunger Games series coinciding with the release of The Hobbit, it really does feel like it did all those years ago. Certainly, Peter Jackson wants to do it all over again, and why not? It’s a treat to indulge in almost three hours of fantasy on the big screen, and there can be no denying that The Hobbit is indulgent.

Much has been made of the seemingly unnecessary decision to stretch a meagre prequel out to the length of the epic three-book Lord of the Rings trilogy. Strictly speaking, this series rounds out Peter Jackson’s version of Middle Earth as both an adaptation of The Hobbit and the numerous appendices and preambles that were cut from The Lord of the Rings.

It’s been a long time since I read The Hobbit so long, in fact, that it may have been read to me by my parents. I can’t quite remember what‘s original, and what’s just filler, but these films are ticking all the boxes for me. Last year had the encounter with trolls and Bilbo’s riddles with Gollum, and this time around we visit the foreboding gloom of Mirkwood, the distant settlement of Laketown (where Stephen Fry appears as the greedy master) and the lair of the dragon Smaug.

The star of these films as always been the visual effects and epic scope, and this instalment is no exception. CGI spectacle integrates seamlessly into the breathtaking New Zealand landscape. While largely flawless, some of the green screen shots are regrettably obvious, and the final sequence, involving much molten gold, is decidedly lacklustre.

Martin Freeman shines as the unassuming Bilbo Baggins, who has much greater confidence, a result of both his experiences in the first film and the slow but steady corruption of the ring. Similarly, the deposed king Thorin (Richard Armitage) appears to come under the influence of his lost wealth as the party nears the ocean of gold below the mountain.

New material includes the presence of Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and Jackson’s original character Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly, providing the film’s only female lead) who flesh out the scenes in the Elven kingdom and provide some intrigue into the relationships between Elves and Dwarves. They also help drive the film’s most high paced action sequence, the famous barrel escape.

With a hindsight that Tolkien himself was not afforded, the film is tied neatly to Lord of the Rings continuity by Legolas, along with references to his future companion Gimli and the Eye of Sauron. The latter is the focus of an expanded sequence with Gandalf (Ian McKellen, delivering a typically winning performance) in the spooky ruins of the fortress which casts a pall over the surrounding region. The final sequence, a battle with Smaug through ruins of mighty Dwarven industry, provides another thrill ride, and prevents the film from ending with an otherwise unsatisfying cliff hanger.

Inevitably, with thirteen dwarves and one hobbit in the main party (and countless other wizards, elves and humans filling up the story) the cast is too large, and many of the characters slip into the background. Thankfully, Bilbo receives a lengthy scene one-on-one with the film’s most stunning special effect, the dragon Smaug, voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch. The performance drips with ham and cheese and the beast occupies every inch of the cinema screen.

So while this film strays occasionally into overblown fantasy dialogue, and it can be a challenge to keep up with all the characters and everything that’s going on, this is an enjoyable, if lengthy movie, at least the equal of its predecessor.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

epocDec 24, 2013

I love the Hobbit, it is my favourite book ever! So I have to say I was a little exasperated at some of the additions to the story that weren't in the book. For example Legolas! WTF? Another one the Kili and elf love scene! WTF? HoweverI love the Hobbit, it is my favourite book ever! So I have to say I was a little exasperated at some of the additions to the story that weren't in the book. For example Legolas! WTF? Another one the Kili and elf love scene! WTF? However that's not to say I hate this movie. In fact I love this movie! All of its elements are strong, with so much attention to detail. The set pieces are marvellous, making me want to live in Middle Earth and roam freely. In all aspects it is an improvement over the last film, which struggled to find its feet. But here it gets straight on course, and the atmosphere is always exciting. Also the film is very well acted, but star of the show is Smaug. Credit to Benidict Cumberbatch, he's dark and installs fear into audiences. The CGI is also fantastic, leading to some amazing visual spectical. The action is great, but takes a different tone to LOTR. Instead of giant battles, the action here involves clever tricks and wit. If these changes weren't here I could of gave this a 10, but I can't.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

ConorHatDec 23, 2013

There's so many things wrong with this movie. It's incredibly bad. I hated the first movie. I hate this one more. Thankfully, I didn't spend a penny to see this garbage.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

9

kykinsonDec 23, 2013

The movie is just amazing! it has the mix of action,adventure and fun! It makes me wanna watch the Lord of the Rings again! Really amazing everyone should see this!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

silver497Dec 23, 2013

I've heard a lot of people complaining that this movie sucks because it's not faithful to the novel. This doesn't bother me since film is a completely different artistic medium, and some things will be lost or added. That being said, I reallyI've heard a lot of people complaining that this movie sucks because it's not faithful to the novel. This doesn't bother me since film is a completely different artistic medium, and some things will be lost or added. That being said, I really liked this movie, and thought this was a huge improvement over the first. One of the most impressive things about the movie was they added Legolas and a new Elven character, and it didn't feel shoehorned or forced, it actually made sense. A problem I had with the first film in this trilogy was that the pacing was uneven and all over the place. This one, however, the pacing is consistent for the most part(except for the lake village). While many of the dwarf characters in the first one felt underdeveloped and were more like throwaways than actual characters, many of the dwarves get to shine in this. Benedict Cumberbatch as Smaug is sensational. And it looks like Bilbo is beginning to reach his full potential. In conclusion, 2/3s in, I don't think The Hobbit trilogy will ever reach the heights of the masterful Lord of the Rings, I can still enjoy the ride, especially The Desolation of Smaug. 8/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

HazzypurpllDec 23, 2013

Hollywood ruined this movie. its far too long, why a reasonably short book had been turned into three marathon movies i do not know. The film seems as though it was written lazily, leading to numerous plot holes. it also skims over materialHollywood ruined this movie. its far too long, why a reasonably short book had been turned into three marathon movies i do not know. The film seems as though it was written lazily, leading to numerous plot holes. it also skims over material from the book and instead chooses to add 30 minute action sequences which don't make sense (what was the point of all that gold?) Its poorly paced with predicable action sequences to keep the audience from falling asleep due to all the filler. It is by no means a terrible film, and if you liked LOTR its worth watching, but if you are a genuine fan of Tolkien and his books you will be disappointed.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

CageFreeGDec 23, 2013

Much has been made by professional and amateur critics alike regarding all the scenes and dialogue in the movie that didn't exist in the book. Jackson has, in fact, invented a great deal on the fly, and not all of it to the betterment of theMuch has been made by professional and amateur critics alike regarding all the scenes and dialogue in the movie that didn't exist in the book. Jackson has, in fact, invented a great deal on the fly, and not all of it to the betterment of the story. But if purists are concerned about these additions and revisions it must then be asked if having dogs and goats serving dinner to the Dwarves in Beorn's house would have met with their approval. Though this is exactly what happened in the book, I think this would have resulted with an even greater amount of eye-rolling, if not more, than has been expressed in any number of reviews.

In addition, a great many critics know nothing about the story and are disadvantaged by their ignorance. Lou Lumenick of he New York Post writes, "...character of Legolas has been interpolated into this story, which also manufactures a wan romantic triangle that pits him against hunky fellow elf Killi (Aidan Turner) for the hand of a Katniss-ish warrior named Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly)."

I agree completely with the addition of Evangeline Lilly's character Tauriel as being a WTH moment. I don't understand Jackson's compunction to create her (other than giving the orcs someone to chase all the way to Laketown). But I have two thoughts on the remainder of this controversy; 1) Legolas is actually the son of King Thranduil (see the appendices of LoTR), and since we are in Thranduil's domain, though Legolas is not so much as mentioned in The Hobbit, it's not coloring entirely outside the lines that we might encounter him here, and 2) Since "Kili" (one "l", not two...) is a dwarf, and not an elf, one must not only wonder at Lou's ability to critically follow a simple plot line, one must also wonder at what Jackson and company might have been thinking here. It's beyond me to sus this out...

Another oft cited critical failing of the movie(s) is that a trilogy seems to have been manufactured out a rather short story. This critique for me is less understandable than a great many others. The brevity in which Tolkien tells his story should in no way reflect how that story gets told in a cinematic form. Tolkien's economy of words belies a rather grand and epic story which, contrary to the assumptions of many, does not end with the defeat of Smaug; The Battle of the Five Armies being a huge set piece that occurs after the Dwarve's mission has all but been accomplished. In my opinion, three films is about right to cover all the fertile ground that Tolkien so lovingly plowed and seeded for us in this book.

Having said all that... there are certainly problems that a fan of the book must contend with. For me, the specifics of the plot line Lou Lumenick references is an issue. The insinuation of even the possibility of a romantic plot line between a dwarf and an elf makes me shake my head; but the dialogue reference to what "may or may not be hidden in Kili's pants" (as he asks why he wasn't searched) for me was a bridge too far. I was equally non-plussed by Bofur's confusing "crochet" for "croquet" in An Unexpected Journey, and saying, "It's a great game... if you have the balls for it." This kind of quasi-sexual innuendo I find to be completely out of place in these films. Not that I'm a prude... I'm not. It just seems to set the bar lower than it need be. The "Azog" plot line I also find problematic... given that Azog is, according to Tolkien, dead at the time the Dwarves attempt to retake Erebor. Another weakness in the film for me was the Beorn story line... to me this section is the perfect justification for excluding Tom Bombadi and Goldberry in the first LoTR film. Some characters, though beloved by the fans, just don't translate well to film. Was this just a bad translation or is there something inherent to the character that defies translation... you be the judge.

Overall I rather enjoyed the film. The barrel escape from the Wood Elves was a barrel of fun and the spiders of Mirkwood cast a completely compelling web. I especially like how Jackson included the fact that Bilbo could understand the spider's speach when he was wearing the One Ring. The visualization of Gandalf and the Necromancer in Dol Guldur was, for me, an added pleasure. I don't believe there is any fan of The Hobbit or the LoTR that hasn't wished in our heart of hearts that Tolkien had given us more of this story, or wanted to see that confrontation played out on film. I, for one, am hoping that Jackson will dazzle us with Sauron's eviction from Dol Guldur by the White Council in the third installment. But the pièce de résistance has to be Bilbo's verbal thrust and parry with Smaug. The anticipation built in An Unexpected Journey is paid off in spades in Desolation. Benedict Cumberbatch plays a spellbinding and villainous Smaug. I hung on every word, and when it was over felt an almost physical pain of withdrawal.

Is it a perfect film? Hardly... but it certainly satisfies this life-long Tolkien fan… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

riversusDec 23, 2013

It was a good movie. Jackson was able to developed in the right way a book like The Hobbit (that was thought for kids and not for adults). I didnt like some details, especially the romance between the dwarf and Tauriel (I'd say it was noIt was a good movie. Jackson was able to developed in the right way a book like The Hobbit (that was thought for kids and not for adults). I didnt like some details, especially the romance between the dwarf and Tauriel (I'd say it was no sense and not consistent with the rest of the plot). I also think that it should have ended in a different way but whatever. Good job anyway.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Lambo442Dec 23, 2013

This film is way too fragmented and leaves so many plot threads dangling in the wind you walk out feeling kind of unsatisfied, Smaug looks amazing but never shuts up talking when he should be scorching stuff.Also getting bored of charactersThis film is way too fragmented and leaves so many plot threads dangling in the wind you walk out feeling kind of unsatisfied, Smaug looks amazing but never shuts up talking when he should be scorching stuff.Also getting bored of characters surviving situations that they would never survive in reality, You expect that to an extent in fantasy films, but falling off of huge crumbling columns and bouncing up again to brush off the dust just makes it seem like they're all invincible. The CGI is so OTT in parts, How many more orcs does Legolas want to use as a surf board? Gone are the gritty brawls like the one Boromir had with that pack of orcs at the beginning of fellowship. Now it's all too easy. Saying all that, I still gave it an 7 because there were some beautiful moments and I will still pretty entertained,… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

kevtheobaldDec 23, 2013

For fans of the series, this a great movie if you not obsessed with the book. I have never read the book, but a common theme among those who are avid readers of the book is mixed reviews at best. If you like fantasy movies, this should be aFor fans of the series, this a great movie if you not obsessed with the book. I have never read the book, but a common theme among those who are avid readers of the book is mixed reviews at best. If you like fantasy movies, this should be a great one for you to see. If you love action movies, you will likely still enjoy this. Some of the action looks very cartoon like, but should not be a total surprise considering the type of movie it is.

Covering the basics, the acting on average is fine, the pace of the film is much improved over the previous one, the script is fine, special effects were in general very good, and since I saw it in 2D, I have no idea if the 3D is worth the extra money.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

ganoncrotchDec 23, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. you must turn off your brain for massive portions of this film if it is to be enjoyed as it is intended. Smaugs breath is both hot enough to burn rocks and wood out of the way but does not ever seem to have had any impact on all the gold in his lair... even as his flames roll over the gold to burn our crew of heroes it doesn't so much as melt a coin.
The river scene with the worst henchmen orcs in the galaxy who've only ever trained at shooting barrels is mildly unbelievable until the portion where the fat Dwarve leaves the water in the barrel, this will shatter anyone's ability to suspend disbelief.
Also the scene where the would be king rides on a tiny sheet of iron down a molten stream of gold running from the forge... yes, I think he would at least be complaining as his skin melted to it never mind the radiating heat would have burned off all his Hair and melted his skin.

Good movie tho, and you have to remember this is a Movie being made of the Story how Bilbo wants to have it remembered, them embellishing a little on how many people they killed or how far certain falls were is understandable as he is a small hobbit who likes to talk big of everything he does.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

american_hustleDec 23, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. An Unexpected Journey was pretty good for this most part, but Desolation of Smaug is very disappointing. I didn't want to see heads behind cut off every 6 seconds, nor Stephen Fry (wtf?), nor that stupid cringeworthy romance. Who's idea was it to film action sequences by throwing a handheld camera about? Who the hell is this bard bloke? Why did they feel the need to put in a token?

Jackson has lost his way in capturing the essence of the hobbit, slathered on a thick helping of cheese and colour saturation, and bloated it beyond proportion with stuff that you dont care about. So much poor dialogue and acting, and the main attraction? Smaug was ok but not that great he talked waaaay too much by the end he just seemed silly, and ffs benedict cucumberpatch?! why did they need an a-lister to voice the dragon?… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

morty20Dec 23, 2013

I watched the first movie. it was great. I watched desolation of smaug. IT WAS AWESOME! i love the movie. I love everything about it. Go out and watch this movie. it's worth it. I'm fire... i'm death! -smaug

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

MouthofSauronDec 23, 2013

The second installment in The Hobbit franchise is a fast-paced adventure flick, sure to please the average moviegoer. The visuals are fantastic, if a little over the top- some scenes seem excessive and drawn-out. It's a darker film than itsThe second installment in The Hobbit franchise is a fast-paced adventure flick, sure to please the average moviegoer. The visuals are fantastic, if a little over the top- some scenes seem excessive and drawn-out. It's a darker film than its predecessor, and certainly a stronger one.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

PuppetmanInBCDec 23, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie deviates so far from the book as to make it not really an adaptation. Peter Jackson has taken The Hobbit and turned it into a spectacle, adding violence and action where it didn't exist in the book. Legolas wasn't in The Hobbit, and he didn't slay 30 orcs inside Dale. And his female companion is also a new character and between herself and Legolas, they probably killed an entire army of orcs.

No dwarves were left behind in Dale they all went. No dwarves went looking for Bilbo as he went exploring into the halls of the Lonely Mountain the first time.

What was done well? The dragon, and that's about it. The rest of the movie was as subtle as an dwarven axe to the head. The gentleness of hobbits, the warm nuances of the book, were lost in this ridiculous pile of over exaggerated crap.

Avoid it it's ruined JRR Tolkien's legacy. Go and read the book to your kids instead.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

LokathorDec 22, 2013

Better than the first one, but still full of action that clearly has no element of real danger. The Black Arrows were changed into harpoon things instead of actual arrows, which was strange. The movie doesn't feel like a story that completesBetter than the first one, but still full of action that clearly has no element of real danger. The Black Arrows were changed into harpoon things instead of actual arrows, which was strange. The movie doesn't feel like a story that completes on its own, which is probably the result of being a Part 2/3.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Max142Dec 22, 2013

Beyond magnificent! Went to see this today with my family hoping for great things and we were all so happy to see it was even better than we hoped.

Wonderful gripping story, interesting deep characters, spectacle battle and fight scenes,Beyond magnificent! Went to see this today with my family hoping for great things and we were all so happy to see it was even better than we hoped.

Wonderful gripping story, interesting deep characters, spectacle battle and fight scenes, epic flow of events, dialogue was truly touching in places, acting superb, music was fantastic, look and feel was stunning.

I’m definitely going to go and see this again, a perfect blend of material from the book, other Tolkien works and original content to make it all mesh perfectly together for the film.

I am a huge fan of the Hobbit book and all of Tolkien’s works so I wanted a lot from this film and it absolutely delivered, I really can not praise this enough.

Wonderful film, highly recommend! A must see film!… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

9

StaticSpineDec 22, 2013

Another breathtaking part of an Epic adventure. Three hours of pure epicness. I have no idea what else to say about the movie, just go see it yourself.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

7

HayzeDec 22, 2013

Although this movie diverges from the book, Peter Jackson does a great job incorporating a good story that was never introduced by Tolkien. The tie in with Gandalf and "The Necromancer", Bard's background story, and the visually incredibleAlthough this movie diverges from the book, Peter Jackson does a great job incorporating a good story that was never introduced by Tolkien. The tie in with Gandalf and "The Necromancer", Bard's background story, and the visually incredible scene with Smaug and Erebor really shows how well they did with the extra story that was unwritten by Tolkien. Hobbit readers may think it isn't fantastic because it greatly changes from the book, but they did a great job switching the story up and making these other elements work. I even was disappointed with some of the changes, but I took into consideration the viewers that haven't read the book. For them, I believe it is excellent. And finally, was the barrel scene not the coolest display of action that you've seen in awhile? Hands down, one of the most spectacular scenes I have ever witnessed in terms of action.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

muntingprinsipeDec 21, 2013

This is way, way better than the first installment. People should really stop comparing it to LOTR because there is nothing we can do to the story of THE HOBBIT. LOTR will always be better in every aspect. I have very high respects for PeterThis is way, way better than the first installment. People should really stop comparing it to LOTR because there is nothing we can do to the story of THE HOBBIT. LOTR will always be better in every aspect. I have very high respects for Peter Jackson and I can really say that without him, all these Middle Earth movies will never ever be the same.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

dtlDec 21, 2013

Far better than its predecessor in almost every way, DoS is still not a great movie, but it is a great spectacle. I thought the CGI and 3D effect were very well done here, and the few times I particularly noticed the work they did on theFar better than its predecessor in almost every way, DoS is still not a great movie, but it is a great spectacle. I thought the CGI and 3D effect were very well done here, and the few times I particularly noticed the work they did on the sound, it was impressive. Smaug was definitely a highlight for the movie being impressively rendered and voiced in a manner that made him seem very powerful.

Neither the story nor the characters were a strong point for the movie, but both were executed better than before, and the movie didn't need those aspects to shine for it to be worth watching. If you are interested, watch it. If you aren't interested, you aren't missing much.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

moonman1994Dec 21, 2013

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug does fix some of the problems of its predecessor. It has better pacing and the story changes that are made are much more enjoyable. The acting is fine and the film manages to develop the other dwarfsThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug does fix some of the problems of its predecessor. It has better pacing and the story changes that are made are much more enjoyable. The acting is fine and the film manages to develop the other dwarfs personalities as well which is a major plus. Unfortunately the film is still much to long and has scenes that would have been better reserved for the extended edition. If you love Lord of the Rings you'll love this film if not you'll probably be bored. That said there is plenty of action but with the length of the film it might not be enough for everyone.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Gamer4life1985Dec 21, 2013

Such a damn good movie; unbelievable I definitely recommend it. Nonstop in action, brilliant storytelling, etc... It's one of those movies that shouts in your mind afterward "It was definitely worth my price of admission." Will see itSuch a damn good movie; unbelievable I definitely recommend it. Nonstop in action, brilliant storytelling, etc... It's one of those movies that shouts in your mind afterward "It was definitely worth my price of admission." Will see it again before it leaves theaters xD… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

8

rafa14Dec 21, 2013

So I read this book and the movie had some differences that is necessary to have, because the book was wrote for kids so there isn´t anything very excited in the book so Peter Jackson had to do some alterations, but I can't denied that thereSo I read this book and the movie had some differences that is necessary to have, because the book was wrote for kids so there isn´t anything very excited in the book so Peter Jackson had to do some alterations, but I can't denied that there are somethings that I didn't like it, for example the part that a Elf start to feel something more for Killi, but almost everything worked out perfectly, the actors were great and I couldn't make this review without saying how Peter Jackson was audacious to make the movie again in 48 frames per second so this is very good. The story is very rich and ambitious, in the end of the film let everybody anxious to watch the last part of the movie and the song choice "I see fire" was perfectly right. This movie was way better than the first one and also one of the best movie of 2013… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

JadProductionsDec 21, 2013

This movie was such a big improvement from the relatively weak not bad) first installment. Every aspect from the action to the dialog has been improved much. Cant wait to see if the last movie will develop as much as this one did from theThis movie was such a big improvement from the relatively weak not bad) first installment. Every aspect from the action to the dialog has been improved much. Cant wait to see if the last movie will develop as much as this one did from the first. And Smaug, oh yeah, even though he didn´t show up until the last third of the movie he still owned it. Probably one of the greatest villain of all time. Just perfect into every last detail. From the voice to the design and the way he acted.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

Compi24Dec 21, 2013

Capitalizing on every ounce of humor, majesty, and mischief that its predecessor excelled in, but also adding in an infinitely satisfying amount of second-chapter-dread, "The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug" steers the lucrative franchiseCapitalizing on every ounce of humor, majesty, and mischief that its predecessor excelled in, but also adding in an infinitely satisfying amount of second-chapter-dread, "The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug" steers the lucrative franchise into the most engrossing direction possible.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Tom_green_dayDec 21, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I kept wondering when it was going to end, there isn't going to be any material for the third film! The special effects were noticably bad and even for a kids film the stunts were goofy and the laws of science and physics went right out the window. Seriously, they surf on molten metal with A METAL WHEELBARROW. Wow. It's not as interesting as any of the other films, the music is the worst of all five LotR films so far, and it was ultimately really forgettable.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

theolambrouDec 21, 2013

great movie, in particular there were scenes that were really chilling; the necromancer vs gandalf scene awesome effects, and of course the dragon scenes

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

1

TerribleOdinDec 21, 2013

This movie is really terrible. Animation just crap, like Legolas there must not be allowed, this film like a parody, and I can not believe it took Peter Jackson. I would put 0 points, but 1 point put in more or less normal animation of orcs.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

7

dougie812Dec 20, 2013

The ending of this movie is cruel. I will leave it at that. This MOVIE is a great adaptation from the BOOK. This installment is not a recreation of the book and they do a great job taking the audience to the Lonely Mountain. To me, theyThe ending of this movie is cruel. I will leave it at that. This MOVIE is a great adaptation from the BOOK. This installment is not a recreation of the book and they do a great job taking the audience to the Lonely Mountain. To me, they carved a great impression of Smaug as something that's wise and unpredictable. The movie has the great cinematic and musical feel that all the other movies share.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

eli9494Dec 20, 2013

This movie was the best yet out of all the tolkien based movies jackson has done! A very long movie like all of them have been, but never felt like it. Constantly something happening, multiple story lines, and when they finally meet Smaug,This movie was the best yet out of all the tolkien based movies jackson has done! A very long movie like all of them have been, but never felt like it. Constantly something happening, multiple story lines, and when they finally meet Smaug, all I have to say is wow. I thought it was one of the best movies i've ever seen, and I can't wait for the third and final hobbit movie. I am curious how the film will be, as basically the sequels are not sequels they are merely breaks cause an audience wouldn't sit through a 9 hour movie (hell I would if it was this lol) anyway go see it. some people are saying it doesn't follow the book, I have never read the book, but regardless great movie whether it followed the book or not.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

0

Zardoz_TXDec 20, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This may contain Spoilers if you have read the book!

May not be the worst film ever but comes close. The only thing that matches the book is the names of the characters and places. The rest is total crap. Elf and Dwarf love story if I were the Dwarf that would be great but not in the book. The Orcs chasing down the river in the Lord of the Rings yes but not the Hobbit. The list of Major differences would take hours to write down. If I had never read the book I might have a different review.

The 3D was excellent but that is all positive that I can say about the movie!… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

idohakerDec 20, 2013

i will give any one of you a slap if you will not see the hobbit: the desolation of smaug, an amazing movie, the first hobbit is nothing compared to this masterpiece, great story, the 3d was the best i saw since avatar, the story of this onei will give any one of you a slap if you will not see the hobbit: the desolation of smaug, an amazing movie, the first hobbit is nothing compared to this masterpiece, great story, the 3d was the best i saw since avatar, the story of this one was much interesting, the movie was much action packed, well it was an amazing excpeirience and i also saw it on 4d so the chairs moved all the time and there was water all over me every time there was rain, and there was wind at me every time someone shooted a arrow, but the real treat of this movie is one thing only, smaug, you will be like wtf when you will see smaug this movie deserve a 6/10 without smaug, smaug is freakign awsome and he was the whole last hour of the movie, for conclousing i will slap to any one that will not see this movie. there is no way someone is passing on this movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

XCactusHDDec 20, 2013

This is the best film i ever seen :D
It has a lot of interesting moments and otheer great stuff,
I do not know why people rate it 62 o.o i had read the book and it was AWESOME. But the film, is something like, god came to the earth andThis is the best film i ever seen :D
It has a lot of interesting moments and otheer great stuff,
I do not know why people rate it 62 o.o
i had read the book and it was AWESOME.
But the film, is something like, god came to the earth and made the hobbit.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

10

LeZeeDec 20, 2013

The second installment of the 'Hobbit' trilogy which is the prequel to 'The Lord of the Rings' trilogy. 365 days of wait is over, last year around the same day I saw 'An Unexpected Journey'. It totally blew me away with those awesomeThe second installment of the 'Hobbit' trilogy which is the prequel to 'The Lord of the Rings' trilogy. 365 days of wait is over, last year around the same day I saw 'An Unexpected Journey'. It totally blew me away with those awesome thrilling adventures and great graphics especially to watch a favourite movie in high frame rate gave a new dimensional experience. Also to see the 'The Lord of the Rings' character in digital 3D especially Gollum was amazing.

The movie kick starts with the director Peter Jackson's cameo as he crosses over from left to right on the screen having a bite of a carrot in a town called Bree. Then the missing scene from the first part of 'Hobbit' commence where the great wizard Gandalf the Grey offers the help to the dwarfs to reclaim their kingdom. After that the narration continues from where it ended in 'An Unexpected Journey'. The nonstop exciting journey of dwarfs proceeds in the middle-earth nothing lesser than its earlier part with the company of a Hobbit, Bilbo Baggins. So the hope remains in Thorin, the next king of Erebor to fight back their enemy and take a revenge.

The missing in this movie is the Gollum, I don't think he will come back in the next installment as well. A little disappointing for Gandalf fans as well. He was not in action as much we aspired to see his magical stuffs. If you are a die hard 'The Lord of the Rings' the list goes on. In another way it is great to see new faces around. But you must remember it is not the movie(s) about the 'ring', it is the dwarfs tale where it all happens before Gimli, son of Gloin.

Like I said the good thing is the reintroduction of the Elvin prince of Woodland Realm, Legolas. Last time we saw him in the final battle of middle-earth in the movie 'The Return of the King'. The 'Lost' fame Evangeline Lilly was the newest major addition of the series and she was amazing. She lonely fulfilled the due of women's contribution of this particular movie of 'Hobbit' trilogy. Like she Luke Evans was also had a prominent role but I guess his major action sequences will come in the next part.

In this and next paragraph I gonna write some good's and bad's of this movie. I wanna begin by saying HFR was unbelievable, the picture quality was very good with no blurs in fast panning camera sequences. I know few people may get hard time to adjust with smoothness in motion but you will get used to it if you already saw the first. Compared to 'An Unexpected Journey' it had a little more drama in story narration but as usual it had the adventures that happen in a tight situation. There's a similar kind escape scene what we had seen under the mountain kingdom Goblin. Here which happen in the water I mean the river where dwarfs are getting escaped from the Elves and of course the Arcs.

"My arm is like tenfold shields, my teeth are like swords, my claws are the spear, the shock of my tail is a thunderbolt, my wings a hurricane and my breath death" is what the Smaug describes himself angrily. In this whole movie all I expected was to see the Smaug, the last great dragon of middle-earth. As we know it was an adaptation of children's book so I was curious to see Smaug to talk. In all the last four movies I have not seen talking animal as per my knowledge. The first time I got the impression of the root base of fantasy touch like we had seen in 'Narnia' and 'Harry Potter' movie series. The British actor Benedict Cumberbatch gave his incredible voice and performance through motion capture to the Smaug.

There's nothing we can do than have a peek while it is in the cinema hall. As usual this movie will bomb the box office. I am already beginning to think about the 2015 Christmas holiday, without 'Hobbit' it will be most disappointment festival season. As for now I gonna end 2013 with this masterpiece.

Tolkien would have been blown away to see his own creation in a breathtaking motion picture. He wrote it keeping in mind children, as based on a children the movie achieved the heights that no one ever imagined which attracted the adults more than children. So all the credits go to the man behind it, Peter Jackson and then the his cast and crew. Now I have to wait another 365 days to have the grand finale of the 'Hobbit' series, feels like one more decade to go. In the mean time I might see it again and wait for the Blu-ray. So what's your plan...… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

v3ntDec 20, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I got fed up of Hobbits staring open mouthed, feeling faint & ogling over rings in the first trilogy I was looking forward Jackson pulling back on the clumsy and overstated references for the Hobbit series and refining his story telling somewhat. No such luck.

The book is actually quite funny and the characters and there interactions hold the story. They seem like a second thought in this movie. Why are they all so suspicious of each other all the time? It gets so boring and repetitive and doesn't follow true to the book. And instead of trying to tackle the more difficult parts of the story that a book can do easily he just inserts loads of action scenes or even voice overs. [spoilers ahead] The first trilogy really gave the impressions of them having to get somewhere far away whereas here there's no pace and they basically walk into a wood, got caught then floated down a river to the mountain. Its more like a 3 hour domino rally.

I was looking forward to Bilbo and Smaug having a chatter but was interrupted by the dwarves which was followed by another dodgy rollercoaster of an action scene to an abrupt ending.

The Hobbit series is also starting to undermine the LOTR trilogy with endless & pointless references to the great evil, Sauron & the ring which was barely mentioned in the hobbit book. No one knew anything about it at the start of LOTR. After this movie you'd think Gandalf and the rest would of put 2 2 together as about 60 years later they fight the same villain with the same name!

I'm honestly starting to thing that it was padded out and split into 3 films so he could make 33% more profits for next to nothing and also save a massive amount of time actually editing out all the nonsense.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

4

steve0393k3kdijDec 19, 2013

1) There is NO WAY (in other words, utterly and completely impossible) that there is going to be ANYTHING even remotely resembling "romance" between and Elf-Maid and a Dwarf. Whoever wrote this Turiel and Kili stuff is an absolute IDIOT.1) There is NO WAY (in other words, utterly and completely impossible) that there is going to be ANYTHING even remotely resembling "romance" between and Elf-Maid and a Dwarf. Whoever wrote this Turiel and Kili stuff is an absolute IDIOT.

2) We already have one Orc general baddie. We don't need to invent another one.

3) Turiel. Totally uneccessary distraction. Inventing superflous characters to give little girls something to identify with is bad film making.

4) The entire battle scene under the mountain between Smaug and the Dwarves was completely ridiculous and literally unbelievable. Nothing even remotely similar happened in the book. But if you MUST invent an entirely unneccesary scene then at least make it believable. Yeah right they on the spot figured out a way to trick Smaug into smelting gold for them, and channeled it into a mold and put him in position to get covered in the melted gold when the mold bursts. Just plain stupid.

5) WE DON'T NEED EXTRA LONG MOVIES PADDED WITH EXTRANEOUS NONSENSE. OK, fine, make 3 movies out of it since you want to milk the property for everyting you can. 90 minutes each is long enough. Sitting through endless poorly conceived subplots does not make the movies better. Just longer.

Unbelievable.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

9

bearsDec 19, 2013

The second installment of this series encapsulates everything that made me fall in love with the LOTR 's series and kept me completely captivated from it's opening scene. Though I wasn't a huge fan of the first, Peter Jackson regroups with'The second installment of this series encapsulates everything that made me fall in love with the LOTR 's series and kept me completely captivated from it's opening scene. Though I wasn't a huge fan of the first, Peter Jackson regroups with' Smaug' and stays true to the formula that put Tolkien in all of our hearts. In short, it's why we go to the movies and delivers amazing performances by all. The Elves have never looked so slick and the production, especially Smaug the dragon, will make your jaw drop. I saw it last night, have been thinking about it since and will certainly see it a second time in 3D (the format in which I think it's meant to be seen). Brilliant all around.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

braedenDec 19, 2013

Comparing to disappointing first part, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is much better movie. It has better pacing, more meaningful action scenes, more character development and it was entertaining from start to finish. Only time I wasComparing to disappointing first part, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is much better movie. It has better pacing, more meaningful action scenes, more character development and it was entertaining from start to finish. Only time I was starting to feel bored was the final action scene which is a bit over the top. The extra elements (compared to book) didn't really bother me, since getting three 3 hour movies using only 300 page children's book is impossible to start with.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

victorhjklDec 19, 2013

This movie is amazing the special effects are incredible, the movie has a great story, there is good actions scenes and also drama scenes, I think that is better than the first movie, and it will make you anxious for the next one.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

firstblood2Dec 19, 2013

Many people judge this movie for being to long and for adding in some extra scenes but to me that is a positive, cause now people who have read the book wont know everything that's coming up next. The action scenes are a lot better this timeMany people judge this movie for being to long and for adding in some extra scenes but to me that is a positive, cause now people who have read the book wont know everything that's coming up next. The action scenes are a lot better this time around especially the barrel scene.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

8

PStakhivDec 18, 2013

Outstanding acting mixed with high quality CGI makes it's action scenes to become new benchmark! The movie isn't perfect, but still Second installment of Hobbit series is the best action movie if 2013, period.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

intruder313Dec 18, 2013

It's an entertaining and at times stunning movie but some of the sections which are actually from The Hobbit (as opposed to The Lost Tales) deviate quite dramatically and annoyingly.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

ForeverFallingDec 18, 2013

What a fantastic film. An Unexpected Journey was brilliant but this one just takes it to new heights, with a lot more action to boot. Thrilling and fun action scenes, great acting, beautiful scenery. The film is just shot so wonderfully too.What a fantastic film. An Unexpected Journey was brilliant but this one just takes it to new heights, with a lot more action to boot. Thrilling and fun action scenes, great acting, beautiful scenery. The film is just shot so wonderfully too. Yes, it does change certain things from the book, but that isn't a negative and shouldn't hold the film back. Some of these additions and changes make for a very entertaining movie. The only negative for me was the Kili and Tauriel romance side plot. I just thought it was a bit cheesy at times and felt like it was thrown in there just for the sake of having a bit of romance. A minor niggle though. These user's that are bashing on this film and/or giving it a ridiculously low score, simply don't understand movies. The film may not be to certain peoples tastes or you may not think it is fantastic, but it is in no way, a "bad film". Isn't it funny that there are people out there giving this film a 0 simply because it isn't identical to the book? This is a marvellous piece of fantasy Peter Jackson has delivered us, yet again. Oh, and that Dragon! Smaug is awesome in this film. He looks amazing and the voice is perfect.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

10

CrazzaGamingDec 18, 2013

The Hobbit The Desolation Of Smaug was a great movie i enjoyed every second on it. It has the story of the book with some more added features. The addition of Evangeline Lilly made the movie a top for me. If you have not seen this movie IThe Hobbit The Desolation Of Smaug was a great movie i enjoyed every second on it. It has the story of the book with some more added features. The addition of Evangeline Lilly made the movie a top for me. If you have not seen this movie I strongly suggest you go rent it buy it see it in theatres. 10/10 great movie!!… Expand

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

6

DarthSidious63Dec 18, 2013

Much like the Star Wars prequels The Hobbit suffers from the same fate. Except for Bilbo, Gandalf and Legolas there are hard to like or memorable characters. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is overlong and didn't pickup until the meetingMuch like the Star Wars prequels The Hobbit suffers from the same fate. Except for Bilbo, Gandalf and Legolas there are hard to like or memorable characters. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is overlong and didn't pickup until the meeting of Smaug the evil dragon.. It ends like Harry Potter: The Deadly Hallows Part 1 with a to be continued ending. This trilogy which is based on one book is way too long.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

0

SpazzieDec 18, 2013

This movie is different from the book. Therefore a ZERO is obligatory. The quality and beauty of the movie doesn't matter. Being entertained for over 2 hrs with an incredible spectacle doesn't matter. Having the desire to see it again doesn'tThis movie is different from the book. Therefore a ZERO is obligatory. The quality and beauty of the movie doesn't matter. Being entertained for over 2 hrs with an incredible spectacle doesn't matter. Having the desire to see it again doesn't matter. It is different than the book and deserves a ZERO. My opinion. My rules. ZERO.… Expand

4 of 24 users found this helpful420

All this user's reviews

2

donnelbrDec 18, 2013

They ruined it. I've enjoyed every one of these films to date the lord of the rings trilogy, even the first half of the hobbit. However, what they've done here is a travesty. First of all, the film ends right at the climax. That made meThey ruined it. I've enjoyed every one of these films to date the lord of the rings trilogy, even the first half of the hobbit. However, what they've done here is a travesty. First of all, the film ends right at the climax. That made me angry. As result the film doesn't stand on it's own. If one was to divide up the Hobbit into three books, book 2 would be a gigantic question mark. In addition, I've read the book a couple of times, and found the film's version of the story nearly impossible to follow. The film is filled with so much "filler" (stuff that's not in the book, but in no way enhances the story), that it gets downright boring. The challenge with the Lord of the Rings was keeping all the nuggets of the story in. In this one, they filled it with garbage. I couldn't be more disappointed.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

10

hypersonic354Dec 18, 2013

i loved this movie in many ways 1 the design of smaug 2 in the theaters the fire looked really cool. its much better then the first one. smaug is a big heat for the Movie

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

7

DukeJonDec 18, 2013

Mixed feelings about this film. A lot more action-orientated than the first, with our heroes lurching from one set piece to the next, though my main problem was that they suspended disbelief too much again as they did with the first film. TheMixed feelings about this film. A lot more action-orientated than the first, with our heroes lurching from one set piece to the next, though my main problem was that they suspended disbelief too much again as they did with the first film. The heroes seem indestructible and cut through the bad guys like they're ploughing through a load of indispensable grunts in a video-game. The combat has am unreal balletic nature to it and as such we never really get a sense that the heroes are in any danger. It's pretty far removed from the book, other than a few key scenes, and the whole thing seems laboured and drawn out as though making a short childrens book into 3 epic films wasn't stretching it enough. The love triangle is also a bit odd the she-elf seems to change her whole life for no reason other than the fact that she met fancied a bit of dwarf-rough. Stephen Fry is there for no reason other to let audiences point to him and say "Look, there's Stephen Fry!". However the pacing is better than the first film (no infamous "dwarves doing the washing up" scenes to pad it out) and although the film is a bit of a marathon to sit down to I was never really bored. So bottom line is that if you enjoyed LOTR or the first hobbit film you are sure to enjoy this.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

DemonSoulDec 18, 2013

This is 10 for OMG this movie was so good. If you're looking for an adventure with wizards and dragons, it doesn't get better than this. Epic and well told in every way with an astute attention to detail. The script and casting are excellentThis is 10 for OMG this movie was so good. If you're looking for an adventure with wizards and dragons, it doesn't get better than this. Epic and well told in every way with an astute attention to detail. The script and casting are excellent with amusingly clever and thoughtful dialogue. There's romance abrewing as well. There were also scenes that had the whole audience rolling with laughter. I enjoyed this movie immensely.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

8

FordPrefectDec 17, 2013

Just saw this movie last night and I was blown away! Jackson again keeps the tone lighter than Lord of The Rings and although it makes this a more fun filled adventure it can at times seem out of place. Overall however, this movie is aJust saw this movie last night and I was blown away! Jackson again keeps the tone lighter than Lord of The Rings and although it makes this a more fun filled adventure it can at times seem out of place. Overall however, this movie is a fantastic adventure.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

Marcus341Dec 17, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Better than 1st. The shape shifter and Dol-Guldur scenes were superb. The romance element was a good addition. Rivertown scenes OK, they are visually immaculate, but also at times comic and cheap looking, plus, who makes a pillow out of walnuts! Smaug was great. Legos was over the top though. Orcs, possibly more annoying than in the 1st, are way too easy fodder for the blade. Some of the later scenes have an element of impossibility where everyone survives while every possible thing is falling around them, that hurt the first one, but it is better done in this installment, funny at times.
I felt that Bilbo was pretty much lost in all the plot side diversions. What scenes he is in come to a point and end fast, unlike the multi-minute long slash and stab sequences lavished on others. They could have spent more time in Mirkwood, and in the halls of the elf king, and developed some action and drama there with Bilbo. The basic imagery is overly computer altered, I miss some of the natural scenery depicting middle earth Jackson put in LOTR. Overall, I enjoyed most of the film, even if there were parts I felt kept it from reaching it's true potential.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

Mole2807Dec 17, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A positive response to harsh criticism.
This film in all its glory does feel like a middle chapter of a trilogy. Though Jackson opens the movie, reappearing as his carrot-eating-cameo that bags a few laughs from LOTR movie fans in the theaters; its opening is weak. The movies ending is frustrating for anyone in the audience, but that's just because the films content is so good! The film fails to sustain any real structure so to any viewers who haven't seen the first installment or the LOTR movies, will struggle to follow the plot.
Although this film has its weak points it is a vast improvement on the first, firstly; there is tons more action, gore and evil. Then there's the CGI (best seen in the 3D format) which in this movie has some of the best achievements; Smaug is a masterpiece and is definitely worth the wait, and the orcs are truly brought to life when seen in 3D. Though there are some parts of the movie that have clearly been weakly written, this fresh take on evil and hatred festering in MiddleEarth outweighs these few flaws and gives Tolkien fans and Christmas cinema-goers what they need to restore their love for MiddleEarth on the big screen.
Look out for the spider scene in Mirkwood; for anyone who has read the book, they will realize how hard it must have been to write that scene with the spiders talking. For people who hadn't read the book this scene could have turned out to appear a little cheesy but Jackson and his team have succeeded and made the scene work better than any other in the movie!
Stronger writing and this movie could have been up there with 11 Academy Award winning, Return of the King...the film is satisfying; full of action, plenty of fantastic CGI eye-candy and a good performance from the entire cast.
8 out of 10, now wait for There and Back Again.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

1

IanArmerDec 17, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. THE DESOLATION OF SMAUG is a monumental failure on just about every level; storytelling, character development, SFX and even acting. It wheezes, aimlessly, through a CGI heavy landscape via pointless camera moves, pointless situations, pointless characters and some of the worst sets/make-up I've seen in a modern Hollywood picture. The sets look fake, one shot leaves you gawking at the heavily applied foundation on Bilbo's face, the weave of wigs and stick-on facial hair, all distracting from the already distracting and shambolic plot falling apart before your eyes over the three hour running time.

Jackson has discovered a new love of violence in TDOS here, violence is cool and sexy. It all plays out like a computer game revenge fantasy of some lonely Tolkien freak. Heads are lopped off, Elves kill like superhero's in a perverse ballet of sadistic machismo and Orcs look like fetish pain-freaks (a bizarre mash up of flesh and metal). And the gratuitous pornography of violence builds and builds throughout the picture, as if Jackson can't get enough of killing. And killing everything in the sexiest, coolest, physically amazing way imaginable.

Let's not dwell on that, however. Most things can be forgiven if one is hooked into an involving, emotive story of which TDOS has not. Bilbo our eyes and way into Middle Earth takes back seat as a ludicrous love triangle plays out with a porky looking Legolas, a dwarf I can't even remember from the first part and another female Elf called Tauriel. If only the love triangle was between the dwarf and Legolas with Tauriel side-lined it might have worked!

The plot for TDOS is atrocious. That it is the 2nd part of an unnecessary trilogy is no excuse (The Two Towers is magnificent). Events just happen for no real reason. Characters are introduced and their back story crammed into a few moments and we are expected to care for their plight. The careful time and effort put into Part 1 of The Hobbit (yes, I liked it) is thrown out of the window for one meaningless set-piece after another. Eventually, we get to the mountain and Bilbo finally has something to do, other than kill things, cut ropes, slip on the Ring and vanish now and again. He solves an important puzzle, he slips into the lair of Smaug and, briefly, the film comes alive.

The conversation between Bilbo and Smaug works brilliantly. The CGI has obviously gone into this behemoth and the lack of music and overkill ramps up the tension a mere two hours into the movie. And then, it is gone. Smaug becomes a dunce, unable to kill anything within six foot of his snout. There is also a ridiculous 'plan' set in motion by the dwarves, involving hot gold and furnaces and, blah, blah, blah... They leap around like acrobats (everybody does in this film) and concoct the most inept counter attack on a dragon ever staged. So ridiculously complex it would make Dr Evil blush. So easily brushed aside, it makes the preceding 20 minutes of acrobatics pointless. And that sums up everything about this movie. It is pointless trash. All padding with no serious regard for story telling or character development. It just wants 'moments' of cool killing and violence. The entire film is a miserable, boring, tedious, violent, unlikable and cynical exercise in making money. It's the very worst Middle Earth film. It's quite possibly one of the worst films ever made, full stop.… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

6

GigaHzDec 17, 2013

This is mostly in response to m_elders, the most helpful negative review.

I too went into H:tDoS with low expectations but also realistic expectations. The first film in the Trilogy was far from a masterpiece and didn't follow the sourceThis is mostly in response to m_elders, the most helpful negative review.

I too went into H:tDoS with low expectations but also realistic expectations. The first film in the Trilogy was far from a masterpiece and didn't follow the source material to the letter. Because of that I expected "creative liberties" and more action than digestible narrative. For better or worse, this is exactly what Smaug delivers.

First you address the writing, pacing and delivery of the dialogue. Hate to break it to you but the LotR trilogy you value so much is guilty of doing this exact same thing. Whether or not this is the fault of Hollywood or Jackson doesn't matter, there are "high fantasy" flicks across several mediums that embody this style of delivery. Even if it weren't a cliche, what incentive would Jackson have to break out of this style, especially because he's trying to maintain his established Tolkienian universe?

Regardless of pacing issues, the acting is one of the stronger aspects of this film. You complaint lies in the editing or directing and Actors can't do a thing to correct that.

You didn't notice the music until the very end? I'm sure the composer would be happy to hear this, as this is what every single one strives to do. Especially in a film such as this with wall-to-wall score (something I found kind of exhausting to be honest).

Film score, for the most part, is supposed to embody the emotion of a scene without drawing too much attention to itself. This is contrary to a Theme which grabs your attention. That's why there is a LOTR Theme, a Jurassic Park Theme, a Back to the Future Theme etc. Everyone who has watched these movies know exactly what the themes sound like. Usually a Theme is recurring or strongly accented during an important moment. I wouldn't be able to tell you what the Theme for the Hobbit is because I can't recall a scene where they've made use of it. Whether the format can't accommodate a Theme or the Theme isn't memorable doesn't matter, the score in its current state is widely varied and works seamlessly with the visuals.

The action point I'll give you. I would have preferred less action and more focus on certain aspects of the source material. There were many parts that were over way too fast, such as Beorn's scene, that I would have liked to experience in greater detail. However, many of the creative liberties seemed to work with "general audiences".

Legolas in the movie? Sure... why not? Definitely held my girlfriend's attention. Oh, and make sure that the most attractive Dwarf flirts with another attractive "creative liberty", Tauriel. Surely the girls are far too clever to fall for such an obvious trick... oh wait, they're smitten. Well, point in your favour producers.

But your 'Anything Else' section confuses me. Smaug was stupid because he looked and sounded like a dragon? Would you rather he looked like giant cat and sounded like Eddie Murphy? That's about as far from a cliche as you could get but that doesn't make it appropriate.

Smaug is supposed to look and "sound like a dragon". I'm sure there are several interpretations of what a dragon could look or sound like, but Jackson's take was appropriate. You could argue his approach was cliche but breaking news, dragons ARE cliche. I'm sure if Jackson took a chance and cooked up some more "creative liberties", people such as yourself would call him out for the same crap.

In closing, The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is a decent film if you know what to expect. It doesn't provide a lot of substance, or accuracy, or innovation but it can be entertaining and accessible. Go with friends, shut off the overly critical part of your brain and enjoy it for what it is.

Or you could just watch a terrible movie and have a critic's field day.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

iffyguyDec 17, 2013

Peter Jackson did it again. Effortlessly blending action, drama, comedy, and nerd references, we are plunged into Middle-Earth yet again. With great CGI, memorable characters, and fun storytelling, he creates another surefire hit. He nailedPeter Jackson did it again. Effortlessly blending action, drama, comedy, and nerd references, we are plunged into Middle-Earth yet again. With great CGI, memorable characters, and fun storytelling, he creates another surefire hit. He nailed what the book did, which is makes you forget that there's a FREAKING DRAGON at the end, and instead focus on the danger at hand, whether it be spiders or orcs. Then, digging into the several hundred pages of appendices at the end of LOTR, he expands on the Necromancer, who is revealed to be Sauron. All in all, a great setup for the sure-to-please finale of the trilogy. And that cliffhanger!

P.S. Peter Jackson's cameo is hilarious.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

NolaneDec 17, 2013

Coming a year after the underrated and underappreciated “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey,” Peter Jackson strikes again with the year’s best movie- “The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug.” After a brief prologue featuring an excellentComing a year after the underrated and underappreciated “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey,” Peter Jackson strikes again with the year’s best movie- “The Hobbit: The Desolation Of Smaug.” After a brief prologue featuring an excellent flashback conversation between Thorin Oakenshield and the wizard Gandalf, the movie hits the ground running and pretty much never looks back. This is a much more action packed movie than its predecessor, featuring an intense giant spider attack sequence in Mirkwood Forest, a thrilling river barrel chase sequence as the dwarves attempt to escape from Elvish captors, an intense battle between Gandalf and Sauron, and a non-stop battle with the Dragon Smaug at the end. As is to be expected, all technical credits are first rate, from the often brilliant special effects, to the stirring Howard Shore musical score, to the excellent use of High Frame Rate 3D. In addition, the film delivers some outstanding acting, with particularly good performances from Richard Armitage as Thorin Oakenshield, Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins and Luke Evans as a well-developed and sympathetic Bard the Bowman. It is also great to see Orlando Bloom’s Legolas back in action, and despite the initial controversy, the addition of Evangilne Lilly as the female elf warrior Tauriel is a welcome addition, even if she does not appear in the book. The crowning achievement of the movie, however, is the Dragon Smaug (the best dragon ever portrayed on the silver screen) and his initial reveal in the ancient kingdom of Erebor is absolutely perfect. This is followed by an Indiana Jones style climax that ends in a real cliffhanger that might irritate some. For me it just means that the final movie, “The Hobbit: There And Back Again” will launch with an absolutely incredible action sequence. Like “The Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers”, “Desolation” does not really have a beginning or an end, but like that brilliant movie, it is definitely one hell of a middle.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

6

TVJerryDec 17, 2013

Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman) and his dwarf companions travel thru several seemingly insurmountable obstacles to reach the mountain where the dragon sleeps. This continuation of the story is full of action: chases, fights and confrontations.Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman) and his dwarf companions travel thru several seemingly insurmountable obstacles to reach the mountain where the dragon sleeps. This continuation of the story is full of action: chases, fights and confrontations. Some of it's inventive, but much is just noisy and busy. Freeman manages to add some mild comic charm with his character, but otherwise the story is all serious. The visuals and threatening creatures are convincing, but there's little about this installment that's a visual wow. Mostly, it's just solid movement forward. Fans should be thrilled, while regular moviegoers will not be bored.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

10

MichaelBreaDec 16, 2013

This movie are so amazing. I think Peter Jackson do a very good job. Everything in this movie are great. I recommand this movie for every one I am not goin to tell you something of this movie. I just want to everybody watch this movie.

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

8

JamesCannonDec 16, 2013

Return of the Jackson. Finally Jackson gets it right. His post Lord of the Rings commercial films have been mediocre at best (King Kong, Lovely Bones, Hobbit 1). They seemed like they would have been sure easy slam dunks for him, but theReturn of the Jackson. Finally Jackson gets it right. His post Lord of the Rings commercial films have been mediocre at best (King Kong, Lovely Bones, Hobbit 1). They seemed like they would have been sure easy slam dunks for him, but the lack of editing in all of them, made them bloated hot messes. I like a few of his pre Lord of the Rings work as well and I knew it was matter of time till he finally directed a good film. The second Hobbit movie gives him more to work with. One you have a great creature creation that Weta can show off, but you also have great action sequences that looked amazing in the high frame rate. The problems of straining my eyes were no longer there and I was able to just absorb everything on the screen. The film still has pacing problems and the characters just aren't as lively or interesting as the LOTR. The biggest problem is the story only really offers dwarves getting in and out of shenanigans and nothing else really propels the story forward until smaug shows up. All that being said its much better than the first and it has me anticipating the final act, which hopefully will shave off another ten minutes from its running time and be ever sharper.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

0

JBBuDec 16, 2013

As a Kiwi I am embarrassed for my country. To add insult to injury the NZ government are giving tax breaks and have changing labour laws to accommodate this garbage. We keep trying out Peter Jackson's movies in the hope he will relive hisAs a Kiwi I am embarrassed for my country. To add insult to injury the NZ government are giving tax breaks and have changing labour laws to accommodate this garbage. We keep trying out Peter Jackson's movies in the hope he will relive his glory of Heavenly Creatures from many years ago. King Kong and Part Two of Lord of the Rings were not bad, but this movie will not appeal to anyone over 12 years old. A friend of ours who worked on it told us 2 years ago that Warner Brothers made sure that this series was made for children (where the money is) and instructed Jackson to essentially dumb it down. He succeeded beyond their dreams.… Expand

5 of 15 users found this helpful510

All this user's reviews

10

SkulbDec 16, 2013

For anybody who likes Tolkien`s books it is hard to imagine a more successful adaptation to the movies than Desolation of Smaug. Unlike with the LotR, where major character changes were made and major plot elements were twisted, almostFor anybody who likes Tolkien`s books it is hard to imagine a more successful adaptation to the movies than Desolation of Smaug. Unlike with the LotR, where major character changes were made and major plot elements were twisted, almost everything is spot on in the Hobbit movies. For this reason they are far better than the LotR movies, and the second one better than the first.
It is full of action, great characters, tremendous effects, sound and design, with crisp dialogue, most of which is directly from the book.. Smaug himself is a particular highlight, with perfect voice acting.
If there are any flaws they all stem from Franny Walsch`s peculiar obsession with inserting female characters into the story where none exist. The attempted love story between the entirely made up female elf and one of the dwarves was cringe-worthy and easily the low point of the movie.
I would ignore reviewers on this, as I would with all of Peter Jackson`s movies. From the first release of Bad Taste they have either failed to get his sense of humor, or failed to understand which story it is he is telling in his Middle Earth movies. It has never been just The Hobbit, since this would be an under narrated, simplistic children`s book with loads of silly songs and which would tell none of the story of what is going on in the background, which is all available in notes, appendixes and in Silmarillion.
Even Tolkien regarded the story of the rise of Sauron as the real story, and he tried to rewrite The Hobbit to include this but gave it up. Still "reviewers" to a man whine over the scenes where Gandalf uncovers this as "distracting" and "unnecessary" and even that they have been included "only to stretch the movies into three parts".
I can`t imagine being so ignorant. Go watch the movie and ignore the ignoramuses. You will not regret it.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

9

LansdenrsDec 16, 2013

The visuals were stunning! The plot was better than the first. The directing and acting was very good! I think this one was better than the first. A lot of action and intensity

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

10

Jamison12Dec 16, 2013

I loved the first Hobbit and saw nothing wrong with it. The Desolation of Smaug is a masterpiece and makes the previous installment look like crap. Peter Jackson's interpretation of Middle earth seems to be more and more breathtaking everyI loved the first Hobbit and saw nothing wrong with it. The Desolation of Smaug is a masterpiece and makes the previous installment look like crap. Peter Jackson's interpretation of Middle earth seems to be more and more breathtaking every film. This could very well be one of the best movies in the saga.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

CiaranJDec 16, 2013

Again Peter Jackson has managed to impress me. Firstly, a few niggles that I want to get off my chest. I keep seeing reviewers comparing the Hobbit trilogy with the Lord of the Rings. While this is logically understandable, it should by noAgain Peter Jackson has managed to impress me. Firstly, a few niggles that I want to get off my chest. I keep seeing reviewers comparing the Hobbit trilogy with the Lord of the Rings. While this is logically understandable, it should by no means factor into the Hobbit trilogy reviews. Why? Because firstly the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings have two distinctly different feels to them, both in terms of the movies and the books. The Hobbit is supposed to be more colorful, fantasy orientated and vivid than the later more darker Lord of the Rings. And so it is saddening to see that people use the Lord of the Rings, despite the stark contrast in the concepts, as a benchmark/basis to justify low ratings.

Which is why when I entered the cinema, and just as I sat down now to review this movie I try to dispel all the bias and judgments that may affect me beforehand. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug was more exciting, action packed and energetic when compared to the first film, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. While the first film served to introduce the characters, set the pace of the film and slowly familarise the audience; it was expected that TDoS (The Desolation of Smaug) would quicken the tempo and pace, and by God it did just that! Fans of the first film will enjoy and welcome the countless fight scenes that are magical, well choreographed and don't feel over the top. If I had to pick one aspect of the film that I would of liked more, I probably would have liked to have seen more comical moments. Again, it is understandable why there were fewer comical laughs than the first film; mainly because of the quicker pace of the film, and the darker subplot; which meant that an excess of comedy would have made the sense of urgency prevalent throughout the film seem unrealistic.

Benedict Cumberbatch as the voice of Smaug was brilliant. Sinister, yet somehow I found myself sympathising with the dragon when he retold his version of events that led to him occupying the Lonely Mountain.

While the first film lacks action and pace, it ultimately reinforces the need for character introduction. While the second film lacks the slower pace of the first film, it is squashed by the sheer speed of which this film moves at. Even the introduction to the movie, felt as though a sense of urgency was needed. Again, this is not a negative considering the fact the film is based through the middle/second half of the book.

Overall, brilliant film, didn't lose its way.... Slower in some scenes, but not necessary a bad aspect!

9/10.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

bmaster4616Dec 16, 2013

The first one was one of those movies that you hated or only though was alright. Certain things about the first one was crappy as hell (CGI orcs). This one was completely on another level. Loved it from start to finish and the ending wasThe first one was one of those movies that you hated or only though was alright. Certain things about the first one was crappy as hell (CGI orcs). This one was completely on another level. Loved it from start to finish and the ending was perfect. The music at the end should win an Oscar, because it was awesome. There were a few flaws in it like the fact that Legolas had a bigger role and the length of the movie was just way too long...other than that I loved it. The fight scenes were top notch, it was funny, the dragon scene was amazing, etc.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

EdenChiDec 16, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a great movie that offers a good moment in cinema. It does not follow the book, but only the outline. Otherwise, the film is likely to be less attractive. 3D is very well done, this is not a film made for the 3d but it is very well done, it gives good effect to some time.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

10

crawlerDec 16, 2013

I think its a good movie, different than the lord of the ring but as good if you like middle-earth and a story that dont rush at all for action. I really like the action more than the first especially smaug and the barrel-ride. Legolas andI think its a good movie, different than the lord of the ring but as good if you like middle-earth and a story that dont rush at all for action. I really like the action more than the first especially smaug and the barrel-ride. Legolas and Tauriel are nice add-on from book in my opinion. Not perfect but definitively a good movie
Cant wait to see it again and again....the third movie cant come soon enough. 9/10… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

caldepenDec 16, 2013

Much better than the first and I didn't mind the first. I saw it in high-speed and 3d. Super well done but 2 things, the glasses are smaller than they used to be so you can see the rims which is distracting (but the crowd seems way coolerMuch better than the first and I didn't mind the first. I saw it in high-speed and 3d. Super well done but 2 things, the glasses are smaller than they used to be so you can see the rims which is distracting (but the crowd seems way cooler when the lights come up) and secondly the high-speed makes the production seem amateurish during the expositive scenes for some reason. So at the bar when they are talking it reminds me of a 80's British soap opera or a Canadian video production like Littlest Hobo. I think it exposes bad acting more. So a raised eyebrow by Gandalf looks kind of silly and deliberate or when Thorin notices bad guys it is super obvious like you can almost hear the director saying "look that way, then that way...". For the most part the action scenes are pretty spectacular, although at times somewhat video-gamey.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

CosmonaustaDec 16, 2013

Although it does bother me how much they strayed from the source material (especially in regards to Legolas), I thoroughly enjoyed The Desolation of Smaug as a movie-going experience. As a film, it's action-packed, funny at times, andAlthough it does bother me how much they strayed from the source material (especially in regards to Legolas), I thoroughly enjoyed The Desolation of Smaug as a movie-going experience. As a film, it's action-packed, funny at times, and visually stunning.
The fight scenes were nothing short of incredible. Jackson was finally able to portray Legolas' agility in its full glory.
All around a very fun and gripping film.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

9

Khunter4382Dec 16, 2013

The stretching of the story is a bit more evident in this film as compared to the first, but it really isn't detrimental to the overall success of the film. This is pure cinema greatness.....engaging and beautifully filmed. Performances areThe stretching of the story is a bit more evident in this film as compared to the first, but it really isn't detrimental to the overall success of the film. This is pure cinema greatness.....engaging and beautifully filmed. Performances are all top-notch. I don't feel that the addition of Tauriel (the new elf) was necessary, but it worked. And yes, Smaug is easily the best looking (and sounding) dragon you'll ever see!… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

0

wew2Dec 16, 2013

I love the world of J.R.R Tolkien. I also celebrate a creative film maker changing a novel to bring it to the screen (Kubrick’s “The Shining” is a brilliant example). I enjoyed Jackson’s “The Lord of the Rings” immensely, but this? TheI love the world of J.R.R Tolkien. I also celebrate a creative film maker changing a novel to bring it to the screen (Kubrick’s “The Shining” is a brilliant example). I enjoyed Jackson’s “The Lord of the Rings” immensely, but this? The original source story is completely gone as well as any feeling of wonder. I remember admiring Mr. Jackson’s restrained use of CGI in the “Lord of the Rings” as a real blessing. He should take a lesson from his source (the One Ring) and realize absolute power corrupts absolutely. This film is a mess. Since when are elves Jedi’s? I disliked the first Hobbit but am such a fan I took a chance and walked out of the theater feeling profoundly disappointed and cheated. I’m done and will not be bothering with the third installment.… Expand

7 of 21 users found this helpful714

All this user's reviews

8

felipeguaranaDec 16, 2013

Everything about The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug represents an improvement over the first installment of Peter Jackson's The Hobbit. Just remember, it's not a book! It's a movie and a great adaptation from the book, don't go watch if youEverything about The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug represents an improvement over the first installment of Peter Jackson's The Hobbit. Just remember, it's not a book! It's a movie and a great adaptation from the book, don't go watch if you have in mind that is 100% equal to the book. Honestly, you're a idiot if you do this.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

9

normypDec 16, 2013

This was a lot better than the first part of the Hobbit trilogy, mainly because we had a bit of romance, a bit of live action for once and some scenes which weren't constantly CGI which was a relief. The best scenes in my opinion were nearThis was a lot better than the first part of the Hobbit trilogy, mainly because we had a bit of romance, a bit of live action for once and some scenes which weren't constantly CGI which was a relief. The best scenes in my opinion were near the end and the scenes between Killi and the She-Elf. In my opinion, there was a bit too much CGI, I much prefer real sets but for the Orcs the CGI was perfect because it felt like they were actually fighting monsters not just men dressed up as monsters. The Orcs were perfect in my opinion, just a shame they have too much elven language, I much prefer the Orcs to act stupid and speak english than speak in this poetic manner, okay it's fine for the white orc because he's badass but his little grunts should speak english. The CGI, although a lot of it, was probably the best I've seen in a film, it really allowed the filmmakers to create more of a fantasy world instead of just showing us New Zealand, which isn't bad by the way. I found it thoroughly entertaining but The Hobbit works and flows best when it's just trying to be its own film. When you clearly hear lines and jokes copied from LOTR it's kind of cringey, they don't need to please LOTR fans they need to just clear their heads and focus on the story at hand. Either way, great film just hopefully for the next film we'll see more real sets and action sequences in places like Helm's Deep, like an out door set, they're so cool.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

PHJDec 16, 2013

I don't know what to say, this movie is great obviously, by the way there is some problems witch make it worst than the 1fst one, Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug continue and follow correctly the history, and starts badly.

When the movieI don't know what to say, this movie is great obviously, by the way there is some problems witch make it worst than the 1fst one, Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug continue and follow correctly the history, and starts badly.

When the movie self develops it starts to be great, the scene of the river (witch is in the trailer, no spoiler) it's just perfect, the background music, the animation, the especial effects and the theme is great, and you will have more great scenes like this as the movie continues, so about sound track, especial effects, actuation, voiceover, background and history, the movie is great.

I think the point witch everyvbody hates in this movie is the final, but think if you was the director of Hobbit, you have a great triology to make movies, what you can do to obligate the people to continue watching the triology? No finals, you watch a 2:30 hours movie and don't see any final, it's a bad point? Is, but it's good for create an expective for the next Hobbit.

The scenes with Smaug is a little bit confusig, obviouly Bilbo will not kill the dragon alone, so the dwarfs came to help him, and they start to make a trap for Smaug, the movie shows that, but you will know that they are making the trap just when Samug is trapped, so it's confusing.

The strong points of the movie is the beatiful soundtrack and the sounds by it self, the especial effects, the background (witch is in New Zeland, and it's impressive), the great history and how the movie shows the changes of Bilbo, this is nice and a strong point of the movie. Hobbit The Desolation of Smaug is a worthy 8 8.5 movie, I recomend!… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

LensesDec 16, 2013

Take my advice and don't bother seeing The Hobbit until this time next year on DVD. You will thank me later.

The movie is fine, but the ending is so abrupt that the entire theater sighed and laughed when it ended in the middle of theTake my advice and don't bother seeing The Hobbit until this time next year on DVD. You will thank me later.

The movie is fine, but the ending is so abrupt that the entire theater sighed and laughed when it ended in the middle of the climax. I guess they need to drag it out into another movie. So. Do youself a favor and just wait. Or prepare to be dissappointed in the ending.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

0

BarakrDec 16, 2013

I first read the Hobbit in elementary school, and in the 40 years since have read it maybe ten more times. All my life I hoped and prayed that someone would make the perfect movie of the book, and I was overjoyed when Peter Jackson wasI first read the Hobbit in elementary school, and in the 40 years since have read it maybe ten more times. All my life I hoped and prayed that someone would make the perfect movie of the book, and I was overjoyed when Peter Jackson was finally named to direct the movies.

Er, movies. The-Trilogy-Inappropriately-Named-The-Hobbit. The travesty that has lost all of Tolkein's magic and wonder. The Hobbit is a book in an age of innocence, before Middle Earth realizes the darkness that's coming. There's a lightness and playfulness to the adventure, magic in the dialog and scenes. The best parts of the first movie were those that followed Tolkein most closely. In Desolation of Smaug, the best parts were the all-too-brief encounter with Beorn, the spider scene, bits and pieces of the barrel scene, and Bilbo's wordplay with Smaug. All of these were foreshortened, changed, stripped of much of their magic in favor of added fights, orcs or elves, but at least they kept some of the original.

What hubris to take a classic and destroy it.… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

5

AdamwiseGamgeeDec 16, 2013

As a massive follower of anything Tolkien I couldn't help but be disappointed by this film. To sum it up it was far too long, too disjointed, it follows characters that you just don't care about, it seemed like the quantity of the film cameAs a massive follower of anything Tolkien I couldn't help but be disappointed by this film. To sum it up it was far too long, too disjointed, it follows characters that you just don't care about, it seemed like the quantity of the film came from scenes that weren't even in the book. And finally the film is called the Hobbit but I just don't feel you saw enough of Bilbo. Instead you ended up following four separate stories which just seemed pointless.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

Praetorian75Dec 15, 2013

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is the very enjoyable 2nd part of a fantasy movie trilogy. If you can look past the fact that its not an "entirely" faithful film adaptation of the book you will most likely enjoy it for what it is a bigThe Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is the very enjoyable 2nd part of a fantasy movie trilogy. If you can look past the fact that its not an "entirely" faithful film adaptation of the book you will most likely enjoy it for what it is a big budget fantasy movie trilogy.

I went to the Cinema (HFR 3D version) to Watch this with my son. Unlike "An Unexpected Journey" my son wasnt complaining about it being long and drawn out which is also how i feel about it. Thankfully there were no singing dwarves! The visuals were quite good with the HFR 3D just as you would be expecting. I wont mention anything of the plot as it deserves to be experienced.

I would definatly recommend seeing this in the Cinema. Rating: 8/10… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

9

analogkid280Dec 15, 2013

This is like playing Skyrim but you are watching a movie. Mostly setup for the 3rd installment but has many clever twists and special effects. It reminded me of the newer Star Wars movies in a way. It was a very entertaining I have to admit.This is like playing Skyrim but you are watching a movie. Mostly setup for the 3rd installment but has many clever twists and special effects. It reminded me of the newer Star Wars movies in a way. It was a very entertaining I have to admit. That is rather surprising since I did not like the first Hobbit movie at all. This one brought me back and I will certainly be catching the last movie in the series.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

0

iSchobDec 15, 2013

The movie just feels way too long and dragged out. In addition to that the action scences are just boring, predictable and repetitive and the forced love story is just cringeworthy.

6 of 29 users found this helpful623

All this user's reviews

10

sillyputtyDec 15, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. You can't compare the movie to the book at all, since half of the movie never happened in the book, but there are some scenes that you just can't describe with words!!! The movie in and of itself was awesome except for the cliffhanger ending. If you have no patience wait till next year to buy the 2nd hobbit and watch the third right after. But i still cant wait till next year to see where they're going to go with this different storyline. I wasnt too excited to see a love story mixed in though, but that's just me.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

User Reviews