Read Positive User Reviews for The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies

10

AsyulusDec 17, 2014

The movie was good, i loved the visual effects, great work from Freeman and Armitage, exhilarating battle sequences and apleasing connection to LOTR.

19 of 36 users found this helpful1917

All this user's reviews

10

OrwDec 17, 2014

A great ending to one of the best trilogys in its genre. I loved every part. Great in every possible way. We will all miss this characters, Middle Eart and Peter Jackson audacity and creative vision. All six films are now part of the greatestA great ending to one of the best trilogys in its genre. I loved every part. Great in every possible way. We will all miss this characters, Middle Eart and Peter Jackson audacity and creative vision. All six films are now part of the greatest fantasy films ever made. I'm glad i had the chance to witness them all.… Expand

49 of 101 users found this helpful4952

All this user's reviews

10

rman1256Feb 9, 2015

wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

8

DanBurritoSep 15, 2015

In all honesty, I only saw this because I was curious. But I wasn't expecting much. The trailers displayed a cgi-heavy, overlong movie that was basically one big climax. So imagine my surprise when it turned out to be an intriguing film thatIn all honesty, I only saw this because I was curious. But I wasn't expecting much. The trailers displayed a cgi-heavy, overlong movie that was basically one big climax. So imagine my surprise when it turned out to be an intriguing film that is undoubtedly the best of the three. Of course, it was still ridiculous in some parts but the script makes up for that. And I did not think I'd say that about this movie. Trust me, it's better than the trailers tell you, even if you didn't enjoy the first two, this one will surprise you.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

8

MattBrady99Mar 10, 2015

Time to say goodbye to middle earth for the last time.

The story is about Dwarven party led by Thorin Oakenshield finally reclaims their kingdom of Erebor, the vast treasure draws out now only the wrath of Smaug but also the army of menTime to say goodbye to middle earth for the last time.

The story is about Dwarven party led by Thorin Oakenshield finally reclaims their kingdom of Erebor, the vast treasure draws out now only the wrath of Smaug but also the army of men and elves, who want the fortune for their own.

Let me give you a quick feed back of the other two films then to this one. A unexpected Journey I thought was pretty amazing... when I first sawed it, after a couple of watchers later it's not as amazing as the first time, but I still enjoyed it even with the problems showing. Desolation of smaug in my opinion was way better and way more fun and better film paste then Unexpected Journey, and Smaug as the villain was icing on the cake. Now we got Battle of the Five Armies and I can conform that the movie is actually pretty good and it's a solid finale to The Hobbit series.

Peter Jackson directs this movie in a way that middle earth feels like a real pace that we can go to anytime we want and I got to give him that. Jackson clearly adores middle earth as he really doesn't want it to end and I can see why, it probably makes him feel at home directing these movies and sometimes leaving you home behind sucks.

The visual effect's at times looked really good and once again this movie had that shiny mix with grey color with the character's Armour and the background of beautiful New Zealand. But I like the Lord of the Rings effect's a little better, why you may ask. because the effect's in that movie still holds up today but that's just me... maybe.

The all the cast members did a outstanding job, Ian Mckellen will always be Gandalf because his the best, Martian Freeman did a fantastic job playing Bilbo Baggins and to be honest I like Bilbo Baggins more then frodo in my opinion.

My biggest problems with the film is some of the visual effect's in the movie looks very noticeable and I had the same problem with the other two films. The love story between Kili (The Dwarf) and Tauriel (The Elf), I didn't find their romance plot to really needed for the film and when something bad happens to the two of them I just sitting thinking "Well stuff happens".

Overall The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies is a solid final to the Hobbit series with some problems there and then. Good action scenes, good performances and a brutal fight scenes.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

potatoes351Nov 23, 2015

Peter Jackson's Hobbit trilogy has so far been entertaining yet a disappointment in comparison to it's Lord of the Rings bigger brothers. However after a promising final act in the Desolation of Smaug things were looking up for The Battle ofPeter Jackson's Hobbit trilogy has so far been entertaining yet a disappointment in comparison to it's Lord of the Rings bigger brothers. However after a promising final act in the Desolation of Smaug things were looking up for The Battle of the Five Armies...luckily that pulled through.
The Battle of the Five Armies takes place immediately after the events of the Desolation of Smaug, beginning as Smaug reaches Laketown. As Bilbo (Martin Freeman) the dwarves retake the city of Erebor in the Lonely Mountain, war is on the horizon as Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage) becomes blind with wealth and power; the citizens of Laketown are left without a home; the woodland elves seek a treasure stolen from them and the Orc's led by Azog the defiler (Manu Bennett) want to claim Erebor to give them an upper hand in the coming age of the Orc.
The majority of the film is action sequences, beginning with Smaug's destruction of Laketown and culminating in the titular battle of the five armies. As such the pacing for the film is much faster than that of any of the previous Middle Earth films, allowing much less room for downtime and filler. The shorter runtime also lends in it's favour as the Hobbit films thusfar have been rather bloated with relatively pointless and at times boring sequences with little relevance to the actual plot.
My biggest problem with the two previous Hobbit films is the overuse of some shoddy CGI effects, BoFA does improve it's CG quality somewhat but ultimately pays the price again by literally swamping the film in CGI, particularly the opening sequence and the entire five armies battle. The CGI is so excessive in the film that it even produces frame rate stutter, something relatively unseen in the film industry but something extremely common in the video games industry. This could be due to the use of 48FPS over industry standard 28, but whatever the reason it does lower the quality of the film.
That being said this is the best Hobbit film in the trilogy, what it lacks in particular defining moments (such as AUJ's Gollum scene & Dos' Smaug scenes) it makes up for in scale, pacing and a very satisfying and brutal battle sequence that lasts most of the films second half; the biggest in Peter Jackson's Middle Earth films to date.
A fitting farewell to Middle Earth, Bilbo, Gandalf and the rest of the characters we have come to know and love over the past 13 years and despite it's faults an extremely enjoyable film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

NecrophatDec 18, 2017

Amazing, amazing trilogy. Wow, what an add on to Lord of the rings, this entire new trilogy is just adding to the masterpiece that is Middle Earth, a must watch.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

Th3GreenHorne7Oct 28, 2015

This movie was great, but, it reached for the stars and missed by only an inch. The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies was very great to watch due to it's visually striking CGI which is no surprise to me, which also adds up to theThis movie was great, but, it reached for the stars and missed by only an inch. The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies was very great to watch due to it's visually striking CGI which is no surprise to me, which also adds up to the extraordinary performances of the entire cast. This movie really got me going on it's climatic battle at the end which had me at the edge of my seat, but then I was very disappointed with the length of the film, unlike the other middle-earth movie that were almost 3 hours long, but this was only a mere 2 hours and 24 minute film which made the film feel a little rushed. In the future, if there is a future for the franchise, I hope the next films are just as great as the whole saga.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

mohamad91hkAug 13, 2019

One of the best trilogy I have ever seen, in sum it's a masterpiece, composed of a blending action and humor - and even a bit of romance - to create a well-paced tale that ends up being almost as satisfying. "The Hobbit" is visually stunningOne of the best trilogy I have ever seen, in sum it's a masterpiece, composed of a blending action and humor - and even a bit of romance - to create a well-paced tale that ends up being almost as satisfying. "The Hobbit" is visually stunning in all its three-parts, beside the Oscar-worthy performance by Freeman as a Bilbo (Freeman was born to be a hobbit), also I couldn't ignore the great performance of all cast, the amazing music by Howard Shore that reprised from the previous trilogy and the genius director Peter Jackson who gave us this masterpiece trilogy.

The disadvantage of "The Hobbit" is the ending of part 1&2, where the film ends with ellipses rather than a period, we know the story will be continued, but with a little effort and some clever writing, Jackson could make each chapter feel like its own complete story. The result is probably the most dissatisfying element of the film.

"The hobbit" is surely worth to watch, just let your senses enjoy, even If "The Hobbit" doesn't equal the achievement of Jackson's earlier Middle-earth movies.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

CasualCoolsebMay 8, 2016

A very Good Movie from 2014/2015. I enjoyed each and every scene that was part of the movie. I mean, it has great sound, great effects and great acting. It is a very great movie that i recommend checking out.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Luca1Jan 18, 2017

Very good film. According to my opinion, the film allows to explore well the different characters, sometimes with inventions from Peter Jackson (like for the saga's movies) but this additions are generally very good. Simply I love this story.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

CoreGamer1408Dec 16, 2018

Read the Hobbit it is unlike the more sophisticated Lord of the Rings trilogy. Well the hobbit is one simplistically written children's book. They did a good job of fleshing out these films and characters from one children's book. Not as epicRead the Hobbit it is unlike the more sophisticated Lord of the Rings trilogy. Well the hobbit is one simplistically written children's book. They did a good job of fleshing out these films and characters from one children's book. Not as epic as LOTR movies, but a darn good try considering the limited and simplistic source material they had to work with.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Endercraft124Dec 10, 2018

The Battle of the Five Armies is definitely the best of the Hobbit trilogy. Amazing special effects, great actors and epic battles. One of Peter Jackson's best movie

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

SaythatDec 15, 2018

The timekeeping of the movie is pumped, though quite skillfully. This is the reason I give it 8 instead of 10. Simultaneously I am quite surprized how childish and even humble "The Hobbit" was changed to nearly a saga. I really appreciatedThe timekeeping of the movie is pumped, though quite skillfully. This is the reason I give it 8 instead of 10. Simultaneously I am quite surprized how childish and even humble "The Hobbit" was changed to nearly a saga. I really appreciated the Torin's part of the story, and a wonderful play of all actors.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

RonantheAccuserMar 30, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie was everything it should have been, and the extended edition is even better. It mostly focuses on the reunion of the different species on Middle-earth to avoid destruction and save themselves from the threat of the Great Eye (aka Sauron, an all-powerful ball of flame with a dark pupil). He returns to the battlefield and battles sorcerers in one of the best scenes in fictional history. It would seem any scene is scary as long as the Great Eye is involved in it. The only real buzzkill is knowing Smaug is making a comeback only for him to appear for like a minute and be defeated, just like Ronan the Accuser in the boring, forgettable "Captain Marvel".… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

SoapNuggetJul 14, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The film definitely suffers from it's theatrical release so if you do watch this go for the extended release, other than that the film is not as good as it's predecessor but offers a nice conclusion to a trilogy on the downside it takes 5 pages from the book and try's to make it an epic story that seems to go on for to long featuring a lame subplot about Legolas finding the 5th army which takes away from the main plot of the film, though still has unnecessary CGI which distracts you from the great battle but the film manages to make it boring halfway through… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

YellowKirbySep 25, 2015

Easily the best of the trilogy... while jam-packed with action (which is quite ridiculous at times), Battle of the Five Armies also has one of the best stories in the series, an Martin Freeman and Ian McKellen shine as Bilbo and Gandalf.Easily the best of the trilogy... while jam-packed with action (which is quite ridiculous at times), Battle of the Five Armies also has one of the best stories in the series, an Martin Freeman and Ian McKellen shine as Bilbo and Gandalf. Benedict Cumberbatch does an epic Smaug, and although the orcs are too easy to kill, this is still a fun and enjoyable movie.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

7

HighChroniclerDec 17, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies Review

Okay, it’s HighChronicler’s Review Time.
The Battle of Five Armies is the epic conclusion to Peter Jackson’s Hobbit Film Trilogy. I am a HUGE Lord of the Rings (LOTR) fanboy, HUGE. Like I will engage people in hours long conversations about it and they don’t even want to hear it. I am also a purist, I think that the Book should be reformatted and adopted to be the Screenplay, and from there reformat it to be the Script (Easy, right? Would save Millions of Dollars this way – you already have the script/screenplay/book.) I am willing to accept Peter Jackson’s adaptation of LOTR as the best book-film translation that we will ever see. EVER. As in Tenn’ Ambar-Metta. That’s right, unto the Ending of the Earth.
This Latest Hobbit does little to disappoint. It delivers in film format the thrilling final third of Tolkien’s book. (With a few changes, not all are bad.)
The cinematography is strange, but since I saw in 3D with enhanced Framerate, I’m going to attribute the choppy shots and scenes to the weird format. Also with the 3D the environment doesn’t exactly hold up. It looks fake, I don’t know if looks fake with the Standard viewing, but I would expect that it would be better. All-in-All The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is a really, really good movie, with two MAJOR, GLARING, UNACCEPTABLE FLAWS.
Rating: 7.5/10, 3.75 Stars, 75% whatever scale you use.
IN CASE YOU HAVE NOT READ, HEARD, LISTENED TO, OR SEEN THE HOBBIT IN THE 77 YEARS IT HAS BEEN OUT: SPOLIER ALERT, STOP READING IF YOU DO NOT DESIRE TO HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THIS FILM’S CLIMAX.
Geez, I can’t believe I have to do that.
Okay, I went into the movie with three major things on my mind: The Death of Smaug; Fili, Kili, and Thorin’s Death; and Thorin, Fili, and Kili’s funeral.
First Ten Minutes, Smaug went down with near enough identically to the book, it was different, but wasn’t a bad different. It was fine, checkmark on my list.
Thorin, Fili, and Kili’s Death Scene. Oh boy, this one. I was highly disappointed when they did not pull the text directly into the film here. Thorin’s fight with Azog seemed to go on forever and Fili and Kili did NOT fall defending him. I was upset when I realized that the Dramatic Death of the King’s Nephews was not even close to the way it was. Thorin’s mortally wounded body was found by Beorn surrounded by many corpses of Orc and Goblins. Fili and Kili had fallen defending him. It was tragic, it was Dramatic, and it was perfect. But not in the Movie. NOT ONE BIT!
Here is text taken from The Hobbit for The Royal Death:
“Then Beorn stooped and lifted Thorin, who had fallen pierced with spears, and bore him out of the fray. Swiftly he returned and his wrath was redoubled, so that nothing could withstand him, and no weapon seemed to bite upon him. He scattered the bodyguard, and pulled down Bolg himself and crushed him. Then dismay fell on the Goblins and they fled in all directions. But weariness left their enemies with the coming of new hope, and they pursued them closely, and prevented most of them from escaping where they could. They drove many of them into the Running River, and such as fled south or west they hunted into the marshes about the Forest River; and there the greater part of the last fugitives perished, while those that came hardly to the Wood-elves' realm were there slain, or drawn in to die in the trackless dark of Mirkwood. Songs have said that three parts of the goblin warriors of the North perished on that day, and the mountains had peace for many a year… … Of the twelve companions of Thorin, ten remained. Fili and Kili had fallen defending him with shield and body, for he was their mother's elder brother. The others remained with Dain; for Dain dealt his treasure well.”

NOT COOL. Did I even mention that Beorn shows up for all about 10 seconds.

Then the Funeral. Oh my, it could have been such a scene, IF IT WAS EVEN IN THE MOVIE!

These two things alone are why my rating is dropped from a 9 or 10. The Two most important things to me were botched. Granted the Death scene was not as bad I was thinking while watching it, but It still wasn’t what it should have been.

Mayhaps the Extended Edition will have Thorin’s Funeral, and Beorn have more screen time. If so the ratings will spike to 8.75/10, 4.5 Stars and 85%.… Expand

10 of 15 users found this helpful105

All this user's reviews

8

nms1215Dec 18, 2014

This movie is probably the best of each. While the complaints are still there--over the top CGI, laughable stunts, and too much freedom with the source content. They are all still there, but to a lesser degree--the CGI has definitelyThis movie is probably the best of each. While the complaints are still there--over the top CGI, laughable stunts, and too much freedom with the source content. They are all still there, but to a lesser degree--the CGI has definitely improved, the stunts are still laughable but much much shorter, and they spent less time trying to make this about The White Council (they have just one real scene together).

My complaints are simple: the love triangle was awful and never worked, despite Tauriel being a decent character; there are times where the movie (intentionally) makes you laugh only to instantly cut to the slaughter civilians (it was very awkward); they also were very heavy-handed with the corruption of greed (we got it, a million times over); not enough Dwarf character development (something they have continually failed at).

It was still a good, fun movie. It did a good job of emphasizing events that did lead to the LOTR series--especially with showing how the ring is slowly and subtly corrupting Bilbo--without taking away from the there and now. However, this is a battle movie. There is action, combat, explosions and destruction. Peter Jackson, IMO unfortunately, focused on these instead of the great characters he had to work with. To this day, none of the fans of the films (that have not read the books) know the names of the dwarves besides Thorin and Kili (and by extension, Fili).… Expand

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

9

StaticSpineDec 17, 2014

An epic ending to the trilogy, it's not story-heavy, but it turns out a tense action-packed conclusion to the events of preivous parts. Totally worth going to cinema ti watch it.

9 of 14 users found this helpful95

All this user's reviews

9

THEkerimbankaDec 17, 2014

Maybe not quite the best of the three (close competition with Desolation), but it is definitely a fun and enjoyable experience. Sit back and allow Jackson to play with his action figures and I guarantee you will be amused.

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

8

petrocsDec 17, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Peter Jackson faced some staunch criticism from fans when he announced he was splitting his announced Hobbit adaptation into a trilogy. Many cited the sheer size of the book as a cause for concern but the underlying belief was that the move looked more like a cash grab for the studio who were facing their final trip to Middle Earth. The Battle Of The Five Armies posed the biggest challenge for Jackson simply because of the subject of the film was presented to readers as a footnote that takes places place after the story (The story was published in the back of The Return of the King), but Jackson has put all the speculation to rest and released his best film in the Hobbit trilogy.
Picking up right where The Desolation of Smaug left off, we find the dragon Smaug (voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch) arriving at Laketown to exact his wrath on the people of this small fishing village after losing Erebor the the dwarves. Bard (Luke Evans), witnessing the destruction of his home, decides to take matters into his own hands and take on the mighty beast with a lowly bow and arrow, a move which would lead him to come face to face with the villainous monster. Accepting that his effort as a failure, one last chance is awarded the bowman after his son arrives with an ancient ironclad arrow just strong enough to pierce the tough hide of the beast.
Thorin (Richard Armitage) has begun to feel an abundant amount of lust for gold, which is referred to as dragon sickness. The once proud, would be king has begun hell bent on finding the Arkhenstone and demands the dwarves to search until they find it. Thorin begins to lose the loyalty of his kin as they fear his sickness has clouded his judgement. Bilbo (Martin Freeman) finds the stone but fears it effects on his friend and decides to hide it. Meanwhile, the men and woman of Laketown are facing a harsh winter and no place to live. Bard and his villagers journey up the Lonely Mountain to Erebor to ask for Thorin to honor his promise and provide the people of Laketown their fair share of the gold to help rebuild their homes. Thranduil (Lee Pace) and his Elven army arrive at the same time to claim what is rightfully theirs from the mountain as well, a alliance is formed between the Elves and man to storm the gates of Erebor and take their share.
Bilbo decides to find a peaceful resolution to this conflict and offers the Arkhenstone to the invaders to bargain for their share in exchange for Thorin's prize, a bargain he quickly refuses and the arrival of reinforcements from the Iron Mountains arrive to help Thorin fortify his compound and his treasure. War is inevitable and the armies prepare for battle, but the arrival of Gandolf the Grey (Ian McKellen) brings word that their is a more pressing danger coming for the combatants. Azog (Manu Bennett) and his Orc army have arrived and are determined to wipe the three armies off the face of Middle Earth. As Bilbo tries to convince Thorin and the dwarves to join the fight and drive back the insurgents, Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly) arrive to warn Gandolf of even more danger lurking to the North. The need for a unified front and a leader who can turn the tide of the battle is demanded. Thorin must face his demons head on and become, once again, the true king under the mountain. But will it be enough to defeat the coming evil?
Peter Jackson has taken an after thought and turned it into one of most exciting films of the year. The very CGI heavy battle sequences are astounding and the choreography of the hand to hand combat scenes is breathtaking, the film has taken effects to a new level and its awe inspiring to witness. The director keeps the film from slowing down by keeping the story moving along, unlike the previous two films which tended to lag at times. The tie-in scenes to the Lord of the Rings trilogy are nicely done and Jackson completes his Hobbit journey with near perfection.
Richard Armitage continues to portray Thorin to absolute perfection. The actor has etched his legacy into Tolkien lore. Martin Freeman continues to impress with his portrayal of Bilbo Baggins. Freeman's character arc has taken him on the most interesting of all the characters journeys. Ian McKellen is the complete embodiment of Gandolf. The mannerisms, the voice, the delivery of every line is done elegantly. The remaining cast including Luke Evans, Orlando Bloom, Cate Blanchett, Lee Pace and Evangeline Lilly to name only a few, were astonishing. The physical work alone deserves an enthusiastic applause but each brings an amazing range to their characters and delivers fantastic performances that would make Tolkien proud.
Overall, The Hobbit will not be looked upon as fondly as the Lord of the Rings trilogy, but the movies are extremely enjoyable and worthy of a viewing. The Battle Of The Five Armies is a truly astounding achievement on its own and a perfect ending to Bilbo's story.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

9

hackmoleDec 17, 2014

Great cap to the adventure.
Yes, some of the CGI could have been a little better, but the story is there and the necromancer story arc is quite awesome.
Yes, some of the scenes seem a little overdrawn, but I found it was to give time toGreat cap to the adventure.
Yes, some of the CGI could have been a little better, but the story is there and the necromancer story arc is quite awesome.
Yes, some of the scenes seem a little overdrawn, but I found it was to give time to give characters time to interact more and really love them.
For the fan, you will love this movie and you will find some great moments.… Expand

14 of 23 users found this helpful149

All this user's reviews

10

talhalafciDec 19, 2014

An epic goodbye to Middle Earth, Peter Jackson gave us (or me) almost everything we expected in the Battle of Five Armies, though we're all agree that The Hobbit trilogy could have been better, but I never expected something like the originalAn epic goodbye to Middle Earth, Peter Jackson gave us (or me) almost everything we expected in the Battle of Five Armies, though we're all agree that The Hobbit trilogy could have been better, but I never expected something like the original trilogy, there is and there will be no films (made by Jackson or not) like The Lord of the Rings trilogy.The Battle of Five Armies is better than first two films, better visual effects, better acting and of course great fight choreographies.I never expected Richard Armitage to be that good, his portrait of Thorin is truly worth to watch.I think that the best scene of the whole trilogy was the one that Saruman, Lord Elrond and Galadriel at Dol Guldur, the fight scene against the Nine was a delight to watch, and of course Cate Blanchett fascinated all of us with her only scene in the film, she steals it.As our thirteen years journey of the Middle Earth ends, all I can say is that it has been a great journey and I'm very happy witness all.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

8

ToFewViewsDec 18, 2014

This is visually beautiful movie, with action coming out the ears. It's the complete opposite of the first hobbit movie with the first being called "Slow" this one is anything but that. The story feels like it slightly takes a backseat inThis is visually beautiful movie, with action coming out the ears. It's the complete opposite of the first hobbit movie with the first being called "Slow" this one is anything but that. The story feels like it slightly takes a backseat in this film, with the huge amount of focus on action you feel the story progress but no where near as much as the others. But any fan of middle earth will love this movie, I feel it's a great conclusion to the series that leaves you excited to even go back and watch LOTR.
And of course this is a movie you must see in the theaters Peter Jackson's use of 48FPS is visually amazing and changes the whole experience.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

vikesh2206Dec 23, 2014

While events in The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies feel stretched out, this final chapter of the Middle Earth saga closes with a grim tone and suitably epic battle sequences.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

therowbertDec 18, 2014

great action packed ending with somewhat weaker story.
pro:
-the action -beautiful scenery -awsome details and effects con: -story on the weaker side when compaired to the previous movies - Bilbo is a little useless throughout thegreat action packed ending with somewhat weaker story.
pro:
-the action
-beautiful scenery
-awsome details and effects
con:
-story on the weaker side when compaired to the previous movies
- Bilbo is a little useless throughout the movie (i know it's just a hobbit but still)

I totally enjoyed this movie,it's a worthy part of the series and it realy kept my eyes on the screen.
The story for me was a little underwhelming though but far from terrible.
If you're a fan of the hobbit you won't be dissapointed at all.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

10

mikhailduongDec 26, 2014

Another masterpiece of Peter Jackson ! Awesome epic CGI. Although this episode has too much fight but it did its part of The Hobbit trilogies. A great novel & a great film that everyone should read & watch in their life.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

jaizon727Dec 23, 2015

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is a 2014 fantasy action film, it is the third film in the Hobbit trilogy, the prequel trilogy to the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Having reclaimed Erebor and vast treasure from the dragon Smaug, ThorinThe Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is a 2014 fantasy action film, it is the third film in the Hobbit trilogy, the prequel trilogy to the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Having reclaimed Erebor and vast treasure from the dragon Smaug, Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage) sacrifices friendship and honor in seeking the Arkenstone, despite Smaug's fiery wrath and desperate attempts by the Hobbit Bilbo (Martin Freeman) to make him see reason. Meanwhile, Sauron sends legions of Orcs in a sneak attack upon the Lonely Mountain. As the fate of Middle Earth hangs in the balance, the races of Men, Elves and Dwarves must decide whether to unite and prevail -- or all die. (Google). It is directed by Peter Jackson and stars Ian Mckellan as Gandalf the Grey, he is great and super committed to portraying his role, Martin Freeman is excellent as the title charcter, Bilbo Baggins, who brings light and charm to the current dark situation going on in middle-earth, Richard Armitage is great as Throian Oakelsheild, he is the Annakin Skywalker (kind-of) of the film. Hugo Weaving, Christopher Lee, Luke Evans, Evangeline Lilly, Orlando Bloom and Cate Blanchett also star in the film as lead charcters, and i think the casting choices were ALL so good.

The visual effects are magnificent, some of the best i've seen in all of 2014, the CGI looks great and the film has a great color tone. The film is action packed, it has the most action in all of the Hobbit trilogy, and i enjoyed how the film set itself up to lead into The Fellowship of the Ring... Kind of how Revenge of the Sith led into A New Hope. The film is also fun, the battle sequences are amazing and well choreographed, and the film has very outstanding cinematography work.

The pacing was not an issue like it was in the first two films, but the film did begin to get boring during the battle scenes that went on and on, by the 1hr. 45m. mark in the film, it began to drag and get super dull, the film began to build on itself to a certain point when it finally started to wind down, it could not do it. Peter Jackson's direction is amazing in the film, he makes it work, just like he does with all his films, he is such a visionary director.

I liked the characters and they were all developed well, the film introduced some things that got Lord of the Rings fan exited, things that tie into the Lord of the Ring trilogy. The film also has some emotion to it, when Kili the Dwarf dies, I felt the emotion that Turiel felt, and I liked that about the film, it makes you feel good.

The film has great writing, and amazing dialogue, some of the best dialogue of all time in a film, the Howard Shore score was excellent as always, it started to feel like the Lord of the Rings and it felt amazing, Howard Shore is my second favorite film score composer, behind John Williams.

In conclusion, The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies may fall dull at points, and may also get to a high plot point and then fall on what it was trying to bring, but it's still an epic, fun adventure with very good acting, fascinating visual effects and great writing.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

GustavoTalainiDec 17, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman) encerra sua inesperada aventura com os 13 anões e o mago Gandalf (Ian Mckellen) em uma épica, matadora e hollywoodiana batalha dos cinco exércitos; a escolha de fazer este o filme mais curto da terra média foi a mais sensata possível, o final da trilogia torna-se imparável, tenso e certamente fará aos fãs um grande e bem vindo adeus.

O Hobbit: A Batalha Dos Cinco Exércitos começa exatamente de onde a desolação de Smaug terminou com o dragão em fúria trazendo o caos a cidade do lago, a cena é rápida e fantástica, Smaug mostra sua vingança e é completamente arrebatador.

O elenco novamente mostra fortes atuações, mas desta vez com destaque a Richard Armitage no papel de Thorin que se mostra corrompido pela doença do Dragão e torna-se insano, o clima de batalha começa logo após a queda de Smaug, com Brad (Luke Evans) se tornando o líder dos desabrigados da destruída cidade do lago em busca do seu prometido ouro para reconstrução da cidade, Thranduil (Lee Pace) o rei élfico em busca das suas pedras brancas e os orcs liderados por Azog que querem tomar Erebor a cidade dos anões, mas antes de tudo isso acontecer temos o mago Gandalf preso em Dol Guldor não que isso seja ruim, pelo contrario a cena é formidável e também não podemos esquecer-nos da Elfa Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly) e o Legolas (Orlando Bloom) uma das adições de Peter Jackson que na maioria das vezes são eficientes, mas em certos casos desnecessários.

Temos 45 minutos de pura batalha, não ela nunca fica chata pelo contrário, Peter Jackson certamente sabe fazer batalhas ela simplesmente só vai ganhando intensidade e emoção, inúmeros clímax aparecem um tentando vencer o outro por mais que seja exagerado funciona e é espetacular.

Tecnicamente o filme é incrível e praticamente impecável, a edição, os sons, as mixagens, a trilha sonora, a produção e os efeitos especiais são fortes candidatos para o Oscars e torna este épico filme com grandes cenas de luta, momentos e personagens um eficiente final para a Terra média.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

10

BlaccyDec 17, 2014

Peter Jackson saved the best to last, the thrilling Defining Chapter made everyone applaud the movie when the credits were rolling. Despite the ending for the middle earth saga Jackson had taken The Hobbit to a whole new level with amazingPeter Jackson saved the best to last, the thrilling Defining Chapter made everyone applaud the movie when the credits were rolling. Despite the ending for the middle earth saga Jackson had taken The Hobbit to a whole new level with amazing cinematic effects. This is defiantly one movie worth seeing!… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

10

SHORTFINGERDec 17, 2014

well i have not seen the other 2 in the theaters my brother gave me the dvds. so i went to see this one. it is suppose to be 21/2 hours long before i new it it was over usually i`m always looking at my watch to see how much time is left thiswell i have not seen the other 2 in the theaters my brother gave me the dvds. so i went to see this one. it is suppose to be 21/2 hours long before i new it it was over usually i`m always looking at my watch to see how much time is left this is one of those movies that keep my attention to the end. i thought it was just great cannot wait for the blue ray to come out. yea a few scenes i was wondering about but that did not ruin the movie for me had a nice time at this movie… Expand

7 of 14 users found this helpful77

All this user's reviews

8

TheFilmFanaticDec 17, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. First and foremost I would like to point out that I'm incredibly biased towards Jackson's Tolkien films given my love of Lord of the Rings and despite the shortcomings of the first two Hobbit films, I still believed that Peter Jackson could strike gold yet again. When this film was changed from There and Back Again to The Battle of the Five Armies, I became hesitant about the finale of the trilogy, but thankfully I was wrong.

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies (BotFA) is a visually-stunning, action-packed and tear-jerking finale to the action adventure trilogy by J.R.R. Tolkien. Peter Jackson brings us a Lord of the Rings-esque final film, unlike the previous two Hobbit films, with style, grace and aesthetics potentially better than those of the original release of Return of the King. Although the premise diverted from the book's content by adding other characters and changing the focus of the narrative, the overall story in the end was better suited for a big screen adaptation that acted as not only the finale of the Hobbit trilogy, but the end of the Jackson era of Tolkien films.

Unfortunately I was still disappointed with the CGI-laden fight scenes, particularly the use of CGI orcs, goblins and other humanoid creatures rather than full-scale, large cast fight scenes like Lord of the Rings. However, outside of that criticism there is not much else negative to say about this film. Even with the CGI-induced Middle Earth, we are given one of the more realistic representations of a dragon in any film. Smaug is unbelievable, and that creation alone is Oscar worthy. The cast is phenomenal, I mean talk about star-studded. I found that some characters were a bit one-dimensional as an attempt to help keep Bilbo and company as the focus of the film, but Thranduil stole every scene he was in. I would love to see Peter Jackson do a standalone film surrounding the painful backstory of the king of Mirkwood.

In the end The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is more than the finale of the Hobbit trilogy, but the end of Peter Jackson's era of Tolkien films bringing a sense of nostalgia to fans of any age sad to see their favourite characters and the visually stunning Middle Earth for the last time.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

10

RufatDec 18, 2014

Peter Jackson made a perfect ending for his middle earth odyssey. And Martin Freeman was awesome. Best of Hobbit series. More action and more fun. And more disappointing because of it is the last.

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

7

MaxsonDec 20, 2014

Definitely a solid ending for the Hobbit series. Despite the massive usage of cgi effects, the movie still looks great in my opinion. The action and fight scenes were all action packed and well-executed. The story was......pretty linear withDefinitely a solid ending for the Hobbit series. Despite the massive usage of cgi effects, the movie still looks great in my opinion. The action and fight scenes were all action packed and well-executed. The story was......pretty linear with some fillers, but overall it was still exciting to watch. Is it better than Return of the King's ending? Hell no!!!! The Hobbit Trilogy is average if you would compare it to the amazing and epic scale of Lord of the Ring. Still, the hobbit trilogy was fun and exciting, but just not on the epic level of LOTR.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

AS97Dec 29, 2014

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is the 3rd and final instalment in the 'Hobbit' series and it is easily the best for me. The movie does a fantastic job in concluding the 'Hobbit' series, and then leading on to the 'Lord of The Ring'The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is the 3rd and final instalment in the 'Hobbit' series and it is easily the best for me. The movie does a fantastic job in concluding the 'Hobbit' series, and then leading on to the 'Lord of The Ring' series. Almost all aspects of this film were excellent, the music score, the writing and the action sequences throughout the movie. All actors and actresses do a superb job in their roles. But my only real problem with the movie is that the bit with the dragon 'Smaug' felt a bit anti-climatic. Overall it's a movie that I highly recommend you all to watch and it's a great ending to one of the best trilogys in its genre.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

banjohorseDec 23, 2014

I've been reading these reviews and I don't think they do it justice. I wasn't sure to give this film a 10, a 0 or a 5 because: this movie is so bad, it may be the best bad film I've ever seen. Scene after scene I was gripping my jeans,I've been reading these reviews and I don't think they do it justice. I wasn't sure to give this film a 10, a 0 or a 5 because: this movie is so bad, it may be the best bad film I've ever seen. Scene after scene I was gripping my jeans, stifling laughter in a struggle not to upset my fellow movie goers. There are so many horribly ridiculous scenes that you are not treating this movie right if you take it seriously. Anyway who claims it's good legitimately hasn't seen a good movie. Anyway who claims it is bad should've noticed the red flags in the first two films. Step aside The Room, you've been beat.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

10

DavidWardenDec 24, 2014

I'm a Hobbit 10/10 .

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

PontificatorJan 31, 2015

A good film with superb acting and great effects. Out of all the Hobbit films, this should have been the one to blow the doors off the hinges. Instead I came away with a sense of unfulfilled opportunity and thoughts how it could have beenA good film with superb acting and great effects. Out of all the Hobbit films, this should have been the one to blow the doors off the hinges. Instead I came away with a sense of unfulfilled opportunity and thoughts how it could have been better. That alone has this film cleaving only seven (7) busted blocks as the rest escape in battle… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

grandpajoe6191Aug 27, 2015

Though the movie seems to be a bit rushed and brusque in manner, "The Hobbit: The Battle Of The Five Armies" does not fail to deliver the epic finale to its newest Peter Jackson trilogy.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Gamed2longDec 21, 2014

Is this as good as the Lord of the Rings? No. But its as close as the Hobbit films could possibly come. Unlike the first 2 films which had whole subplots that were filler and bad filler at that, this is at least one whole movie. And while notIs this as good as the Lord of the Rings? No. But its as close as the Hobbit films could possibly come. Unlike the first 2 films which had whole subplots that were filler and bad filler at that, this is at least one whole movie. And while not perfect, it does do middle earth some justice.
The good. The acting by character leads. There is a scene where Legolas is fighting some orcish spawn, and you just know minus the CG its probably all green tennis balls. But he makes it feel convincing.
The scenery is beautiful. The mine. The town they move into. The world feels real and material.
There are some things I'd like to complain about. It seems like there is one scene in each film of the hobbit trilogy which is required to defy all belief. Such as the "dwarf barrel roll" of the last film. This film has that too. Not to spoil anything, but there is a tower and a falling staircase reminiscent of early Nintendo games. Also the film is a bit excessive (to the point of ridiculous) on the animals. I'm thinking the war "hog," the bats, and of course the bunny sled makes a return.
All in all. You know exactly what you are getting into watching this movie. And its a good bridge between the Hobbit films and LOTR… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

MouthofSauronDec 20, 2014

I must say, this film was a whirlwind of emotions for me. After three films, I've come to accept the Hobbit movies for what they are. They're not the same calibre as LOTR, but then again, very few films are. BOTFA is, like its predecessors,I must say, this film was a whirlwind of emotions for me. After three films, I've come to accept the Hobbit movies for what they are. They're not the same calibre as LOTR, but then again, very few films are. BOTFA is, like its predecessors, exhaustive and often over-the-top. It falters in some places. But, for all the preposterous battle scenes, there're some very touching and emotionally charged moments in this film, moments that were missing in its predecessors. The tie-in with FOTR is exceptionally well done.
I think these films will become more loved with time. The criticisms aren't unfounded, but I think they're in many ways exaggerated. Unfortunately, reality didn't meet our expectations. But for all its flaws, the Hobbit trilogy is still enjoyable and each film shines in its own way. I certainly enjoyed BOTFA, and I think most people will enjoy it as well.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

BshopDec 20, 2014

Great finish to an epic trilogy. Great movie for LotR fans, and any fantasy adventure fans.
The overall movie wrapped it up nicely, making the bridge possible to the first LotR movie. While watching, was really saddened by the characterGreat finish to an epic trilogy. Great movie for LotR fans, and any fantasy adventure fans.
The overall movie wrapped it up nicely, making the bridge possible to the first LotR movie. While watching, was really saddened by the character losses, and equally felt the proud moments when everyone realized the true nature of their predicament. Never thought I could feel that for imaginary characters.
In summary, see if you like LotR, the previous Hobbit movies, or any adventure films.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

genericusenameJan 6, 2015

Could have been a lot better, but it was still a fun movie. A bit too much CGI for my tastes, but there were still a lot of good action sequences. I also liked the portrayals of Thorin and Bilbo very much, though the female elf was reallyCould have been a lot better, but it was still a fun movie. A bit too much CGI for my tastes, but there were still a lot of good action sequences. I also liked the portrayals of Thorin and Bilbo very much, though the female elf was really shoehorned into the movie. Still, it's better than Desolation, though not quite as good as Unexpected Journey. A solid end to a trilogy that, while respectable, never quite lived up to its hype.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

SimpleReviewzDec 22, 2014

Here we are. The end of the Hobbit trilogy, including the entire Middle-Earth saga. Sure, there's probably going to be a reboot or something like that in the future for this franchise, but I doubt it will reach the same highs that PeterHere we are. The end of the Hobbit trilogy, including the entire Middle-Earth saga. Sure, there's probably going to be a reboot or something like that in the future for this franchise, but I doubt it will reach the same highs that Peter Jackson's movies have reached. The Hobbit movies of course don't have the same legendary reputation of the Lord of the Rings films, but they've been a fun ride. Does The Battle of the Five Armies go out with a bang? YES. You have to expect this movie is going to have A LOT of action from the title, and it indeed does. These five armies are all battling each other out for the treasure in the Lonely Mountain. It feels very much like The Return of the King with the legendary battle sequences here, and Peter Jackson once again proves that he is so, so good at directing action. Yes, CG (or CGI) is used here more than any other Middle-Earth film, but for the most part, I appreciated it. Needless to say, I had a blast with the action here and the set pieces. Martin Freeman and Richard Armitage were great and had very good character moments and chemistry. I do wish Ian McKellen had more to do here, though (not a flaw). Legolas has always been one of my favorite characters (if not my one favorite) in the Middle-Earth saga and he's just as awesome here. However, the drama here falls flat at times. Plus, some of the characters' deaths don't have as much punch as they should. I saw it in IMAX, and the movie is one of the greatest IMAX experiences of the year, if not the best. I highly, HIGHLY recommend seeing this movie in that format. The Hobbit The Battle of Five Armies is a fitting end to the Hobbit trilogy and Middle-Earth movies as a whole. Now, as a special feature, I will rank all the Middle-Earth films based on my own opinion. #6 Desolation of Smaug (this movie is around a 6 or 7 for me), #5 An Unexpected Journey (8), #4 The Battle of the Five Armies (8), #3 The Fellowship of the Ring (9), #2 The Return of the King (9.4), #1 The Two Towers (9.7) . It is worth mentioning that I'm kinda on the fence about what to rate THIS movie, but for now, it'll be an 8, but it may be changed to a 7. This movie is the best of the Hobbit trilogy.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

A1K4PWN3DJan 29, 2015

While I am sad to see a second Peter Jackson Middle-Earth trilogy come to a close, this one felt as good as Return of the King did when I first saw it. While it does tell a slightly different story than the book, it still makes for anWhile I am sad to see a second Peter Jackson Middle-Earth trilogy come to a close, this one felt as good as Return of the King did when I first saw it. While it does tell a slightly different story than the book, it still makes for an exciting film and great conclusion. #OneLastTime… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

SkullKidFeb 27, 2015

This movie was amazing! Maybe even the best in the Hobbit series!
The acting was perfect- Richard Armitage's performance as Thorin was one of, if not the best, in all 6 middle earth movies. His descent into madness is played very well- youThis movie was amazing! Maybe even the best in the Hobbit series!
The acting was perfect- Richard Armitage's performance as Thorin was one of, if not the best, in all 6 middle earth movies. His descent into madness is played very well- you understand his motives and even feel a little bad for him as his greed and paranoia slowly take over him, and when he charges forth from the mountain with his company to save the day is one of the most rousing, epic scenes of 2014.
Martin Freeman is also perfect, and the chemistry between him and Thorin is at the heart of the film and lends it many emotional scenes. Two of the best scenes are the moment Bilbo reveals his betrayal to Thorin and Thorin's death scene.
McKellen is as great as ever, and two other highlights are Bard and Thranduil. Luke Evans is great as Laketown's reluctant leader, and Lee Pace makes Thranduil one of the most complex characters in this seires- cold, bitter, and flawed, he is one fo the few "grey" characters in these films.
Another stand-out was Billy Connolly's ferocious, foul-mouthed, ill-tempered Dain Ironfoot, who wipes out entire legions of orcs with his headbutts and rides a top a boar into battle. I could write a whole review on how epic the Scottish, mowhawked dwarf commander is, but all I'll say is he provided one off the most enjoyable performances.
The action scenes are truly epic. The battle, divided into three main acts, is the best action sequence of 2014, hands down. Starting off on the fields of Erebor, where we have all sorts of fantastical war beasts and large scale, epic warfare between the armies of elves, dwarves, and orcs, it then moves into Dale, which has less focus on cgi and more on gritty, personal combat between the main characters. Those who criticize the hobbit for its over reliance on cgi will enjoy these scens more. The final act, on the snowy ruins of Ravenhill, is the best however, with several epic duels (including a truly amazing and tense battle between Thorin and Azog on the ice as it begins to break apart), tragic death scenes, and epic brawls. Those who are a fan of Legolas's stunts are in for a treat as well!
The music is another highlight, more epic and LOTR-like than the rest of the Hobbit movies, with Dain's theme and the music played while Thorin charges out of the mountain the best bits.
The CGI is as always flawless- I really don't understand how people say its bad. For example, you never once think of Smaug as a cgi creation- WETA has done such a phenomenal job that you truly believe he is a flesh and blood creature. Azog, a bit rough in the first movie at times, is now flawless, as is the extensive cgi that went into the battle scenes (including some truly terrifying colossal were-worms).
This is definitely the darkest movie in the Hobbit series. The whole thing is set in a bleak, winter landscape, with gloomy skies and falling snow reflecting the sombre tone. Those who preferred lotr's more mature feel as opposed to the first 2 Hobbit's more childlike tone will be satisfied. The themes of greed and friendship and portrayed very well through out, as are the several story arcs established in the first films.
I do have one slight problem with the film- the supporting dwarves were not given enough screen time. Kili, Fili, Dwalin (who gets a truly heart-breaking scene with Thorin), and Balin are in it a decent amount, but the others are practically ignored, even James Nebitt's Bofur, who was one of my favourite characters in the first film! The supporting dwarves are in this one even less than the others, which is disappointing, but as the collective character of "the dwarves" all in all they were a memorable bunch all through out the trilogy, and I'm sure every one has their favourite "dwarf moment in the Hobbit."
The Battle of the Five Amires is just packed with amazing, powerful scenes- epic, emotional, tense,and some that are truly heart-breaking. Some of the best and most memorable are: Smaug's assault on Laketown, the Battle of Dol Guldor, the scene with the negotiations for the Arkenstone before the walls of Erebor, Dain's arrival, the Battle, and Thorin's duel with Azog and his death scene. Also, Kili and Tauriel's sublot is wrapped up very nicely, and Legolas's character is given more depth. The movie moves at a very brisk pace as well. The whole movie is filled with a sense of urgency and tension as all the races gather for war and then battle it out. Over the course of the battle, the advantage constantly sways back and forth, and you're held on the edge of your seat the whole time.
All in all, this movie was near-perfect and the number one movie of 2014 in my opinion. It is not just a great finale to the Hobbit trilogy (and entire Middle Earth series), but a great stand alone film, and I would recommend it to every one.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Le__XenomorphDec 29, 2014

An amazing conclusion to an extremely satisfying trilogy. It has great effects, silky smooth frame-rate, great acting, and breathtaking battle scenes. The Hobbit: the Battle of the Five Armies is an extremely satisfying conclusion to anAn amazing conclusion to an extremely satisfying trilogy. It has great effects, silky smooth frame-rate, great acting, and breathtaking battle scenes. The Hobbit: the Battle of the Five Armies is an extremely satisfying conclusion to an overall awesome trilogy. 9/10 (Awesome)… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

AllacinJan 11, 2015

Hats off to Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Guillermo del Toro, Martin Freeman, Richard Armitage, Cate Blanchett, & Co. for Hobbit 3! After lecturing on J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis for 10 years at my kids' high school, IHats off to Peter Jackson, Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Guillermo del Toro, Martin Freeman, Richard Armitage, Cate Blanchett, & Co. for Hobbit 3! After lecturing on J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis for 10 years at my kids' high school, I appreciate the obvious love and respect for the Lord of the Rings books they have (contrasted with how the last 2 Narnia books were treated). THEY HAVE WOVEN A SEAMLESS GARMENT OUT OF TOLKIEN'S SILVER THREADS with sparkles of their own, inspired by Tolkien's own appendices and indexes. It will take more than 2015 to think through all the connections they made between Hobbit 1-3 and LOTR 1-3!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

ExtremeTroll54Feb 12, 2015

How do some of you rate this so poorly. its fantasy so yeah its supposed to be fake. frhfdsjfhkjdshfkj dshfkjhdskjfhdskjfhdsfkjdshkjfhdskjhdsjkfndskjfdsk

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

SpongeBobfan13Feb 14, 2015

I LOVE the Hobbit and Lord Of The Rings! They are my favorite movies. The Battle of the Five Armies is a really good movie. It has a lot of fighting throughout the movie! Peter Jackson did a good job of making the Battle of The Five ArmiesI LOVE the Hobbit and Lord Of The Rings! They are my favorite movies. The Battle of the Five Armies is a really good movie. It has a lot of fighting throughout the movie! Peter Jackson did a good job of making the Battle of The Five Armies long since it is only about 4 or five chapters long in the book!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

evtsoaresDec 17, 2014

Does not exceed the " Desolation of Smaug " . Still, a true work of art, because in a year like 2014 where we had several films that generated expectations and frustrated , Hobbit is a show that the public needed . It closes with a flourishDoes not exceed the " Desolation of Smaug " . Still, a true work of art, because in a year like 2014 where we had several films that generated expectations and frustrated , Hobbit is a show that the public needed . It closes with a flourish this epic franchise movie .… Expand

9 of 19 users found this helpful910

All this user's reviews

10

AnarionDec 17, 2014

An awesome ending to an already brilliant saga. While I will admit the battle was somewhat lacking, the scene with the dwarf wall, and then the elves jumping over was just too epic. Also, small references back to the original trilogy add someAn awesome ending to an already brilliant saga. While I will admit the battle was somewhat lacking, the scene with the dwarf wall, and then the elves jumping over was just too epic. Also, small references back to the original trilogy add some interesting points. And lastly, that song at the end adds such a depressing note, as you finally realize that a great saga is coming to an end.… Expand

6 of 13 users found this helpful67

All this user's reviews

10

Beowulf4862Dec 17, 2014

Terrific final episode of the Hobbit adventures. Despite the naysayers, Jackson's film is very character dependent and showcases the acting of a number of fine actors from across the globe. A fitting ending to an epic journey of discovery,Terrific final episode of the Hobbit adventures. Despite the naysayers, Jackson's film is very character dependent and showcases the acting of a number of fine actors from across the globe. A fitting ending to an epic journey of discovery, loss, and growth. Visually arresting and emotionally satisfying.… Expand

10 of 22 users found this helpful1012

All this user's reviews

10

benoskiDec 18, 2014

I'd say critic reviews of this film were largely exaggerated. A brilliant end to a great trilogy and the perfect farewell to one of the biggest sagas in film history.

8 of 18 users found this helpful810

All this user's reviews

7

akino1Dec 21, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Minus one for the quick and easy death of Smaug at the start of the film. I agree with people saying he should have died at the end of DOS. It would have been much more meaningful. Or he should have been given more minutes at the start of the film. Such a fun character.

Minus one for the terrible acting of Martin Freeman and Luke Evans. At times I asked myself what is wrong with these guys?

Minus one for everything happing in fast-motion. It's like a 4-hour movie cut to a 2.5-hour highlights. The clever slow and fast pacing found in the LOTR films and even the DOS can not be found here. Also the ability of everyone (including children) to take down full-grown armored orcs so easily is very very disappointing. This is not a movie for the kids if I am right.

On the bright side Ian McKellen, Richard Armitage and Lee Pace show their awesome acting skills. The scene including Sauron and The White Council is unprecedented. I must also mention the final battle between Thorin and Azog was incredible, like the last battle between Obi-wan and Anakin at the end of ROTS, close and personal.… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

7

silverdragonautDec 17, 2014

Whats good?
well played by the actors, nice visual effects and a incredible Battle of the Armies...
Whats bad? The Legolas Scenes are so ridiculous! Sometimes the Picture is so clear that it cannot be unseen, that its made with Computer...Whats good?
well played by the actors, nice visual effects and a incredible Battle of the Armies...
Whats bad?
The Legolas Scenes are so ridiculous! Sometimes the Picture is so clear that it cannot be unseen, that its made with Computer... Especially the Armies of the Elves and the Dwarves.

Well its a nice ending for the middleearth saga... But some should not expect a new Lord of the rings...… Expand

6 of 14 users found this helpful68

All this user's reviews

10

suncokretDec 17, 2014

Fantastic ending to this trilogy. People that criticize this film often forget how Return of the King was made when it reached the theaters. Full of holes, I will tell you. Unnecessary scene with Frodo doing ninja u-turn on the cliff withoutFantastic ending to this trilogy. People that criticize this film often forget how Return of the King was made when it reached the theaters. Full of holes, I will tell you. Unnecessary scene with Frodo doing ninja u-turn on the cliff without one finger in Mount Doom, anti-climatic Eowyn "I'm no man" scene, absence of Saruman, swift ghost battles, rushed ending with many many stuff missing, etc. Extended edition fixed most of these gaps and made the film much more enjoyable, but theatrical cut was flawed and much worse than Two towers and Fellowship.
So be more realistic. I enjoyed it much more than watching ROTK in cinema back in 2003. The story of Hobbit is small and represent Tolkien's early writing, but PJ did a marvelous job in making this journey amazing. Thums up! Can't wait for the Extended edition!… Expand

10 of 24 users found this helpful1014

All this user's reviews

9

ProteusDec 17, 2014

Beautiful to watch among other virtues. Compare this to say, Exodus and see pure excellence vs. shoddy CGI laden cinematography. Bravo to Peter Jackson for immersing us in a lovely world.

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

10

ThegodfathersonDec 29, 2014

Five Armies tops the previous films in every sense, providing us with a great amount of depth into its characters and giving us spectacular battle sequences. But is it a good movie? Well, the answer is yes. This final film in the long runningFive Armies tops the previous films in every sense, providing us with a great amount of depth into its characters and giving us spectacular battle sequences. But is it a good movie? Well, the answer is yes. This final film in the long running and awesome trilogy is really a large spectacle I call it. The situations are FAR more emotional, the acting is still the same as An Unexpected Journey and Desolation Of Smaug, but what this chapter improves is that it has a better, satisfying ending because the last two ended horribly. This is total fan service and Peter Jackson steps up his game. Middle Earth just got better.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

10

sundaymovieDec 17, 2014

This movie is basically just a huge battle. It is everything that is promised. 5 armies fight, and they battles are amazing. you can either enjoy an amazing battle or you can nitpicking it for having the things you wanted from lord of theThis movie is basically just a huge battle. It is everything that is promised. 5 armies fight, and they battles are amazing. you can either enjoy an amazing battle or you can nitpicking it for having the things you wanted from lord of the rings. more action and no walking around. stop being so hypocritical.… Expand

6 of 16 users found this helpful610

All this user's reviews

7

adpirtleDec 17, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies closes out Peter Jackson's re-imagining of JRR Tolkien's novel in a manner consistent with its two predecessors. Like the first two Hobbit films, it's overlong, bulked up by more of Jackson's fan fiction, and so over-reliant on CGI that at times it feels like watching a video game. But, as was also the case with the previous films, it succeeds more often than it fails.

The film opens very strongly, rendering the destruction of Lake-town by the dragon Smaug and his battle with Bard (finally the Bowman) in breathtaking fashion. Luke Evans makes for a compelling hero throughout the film, though he's apt to be overlooked with so much else going on. Then it's off to Dul Guldur, where Gandalf the Grey is being held prisoner by Sauron. This side-plot is polished off surprisingly quickly, with Elron, Galadriel, and an unexpectedly agile Saruman showing off the Dark Lord and his undead minions while Radagast spirits Gandalf to safety.

The middle of the film is, unfortunately, less consistently engaging. Back at Lonely Mountain, Thorin Oakenshield's transformation from noble leader to gold-crazed lunatic is too abrupt and over-the-top, though Richard Armitage is able to lend pathos to Jackson's unsubtle writing. The elf-king Thranduril is similarly cartoonish, and Lee Pace isn't a talented enough actor to rise above the material. The strongest character in this portion of the film is, rather surprisingly, given how much he's been pushed into the margins, Martin Freeman's titular hobbit, Bilbo Baggins, as he struggles to find a way to bring Thorin to his senses and prevent the inevitable war.

Finally we get to the battle itself, and it's a bit of a mixed bag. The scale of Jackson's computer-generated conflict seems less impressive than excessive, though he is a good as ever at managing massive conflicts while highlighting individual moments. However, the film only manages to become truly compelling again after Thorin snaps out of his madness and leads his company of dwarves in pursuit of the head of the orc army. Azog the Defiler looks better rendered than ever, and his duel with Thorin makes for a rousing climax, only slightly diminished by having to share screen time with another, slightly less successful, physics-defying fight between Legolas and Bolg (who is as awkwardly rendered as ever).

In the end, the sixth (!) and almost certainly final Jackson-directed Middle-earth epic manages to deliver, if not quite the weight of The Lord of the Rings pictures, at least the same level of spectacle, and returning the focus of the film somewhat to Bilbo's relationship with Thorin is one of Jackson's better decisions.… Expand

4 of 12 users found this helpful48

All this user's reviews

9

michael1208Dec 21, 2014

Being the final installment of The Hobbit's franchise, the film itself does leave some nostalgic impression to the audiences; and having to split it into a long trilogy to build up everything seems to be fine even though the last part is aBeing the final installment of The Hobbit's franchise, the film itself does leave some nostalgic impression to the audiences; and having to split it into a long trilogy to build up everything seems to be fine even though the last part is a bit lacking of sub-plots to support the main story. It is the shortest chapter of 144 minutes, starting off straightforward from the happening at the end of Desolation of Smaug, moving immediately to treasure conflicts at Erebor, the not quite strong love triangle between the Elf and Dwarf, and then the unstoppable wars with thrilling action scenes of Legolas and Thorin that last for almost half of the running time. The performance of Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins is still promising as his fear, courageous and emotions are strongly inspiring across the trilogy while Richard Armitage also portrays well with his change of behavior as Thorin, the visual effects are undeniable dazzling and stunning, but there is a few part that seems to be just semi-real, not to miss out Howard Shore's scores are awesome as always for all the six entries. While the story line moves in an extreme fast pace with short conversations and it may seems somewhat diverts from the usual tradition of the middle earth saga, The Hobbit trilogy is pleasing at it is, serves a decent connection bridge to Lord of the Ring and the ending with theme song "The Last Goodbye" drives audience's emotion to feel reluctant for farewell. Overall, The Hobbit franchise is worth for one last time although it loses some of the magic compared to Lord of the Ring Trilogy.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

8

JohnMasterLJan 4, 2015

Un final épico, cargado de acción, divertida y entretenida en todo momento, 140 minutos que los fans y no tan fans disfrutaran, El Hobbit se auto nombra como otro clásico fantástico, Bien Hecho Peter Jackson, ojala dentro de los próximos añosUn final épico, cargado de acción, divertida y entretenida en todo momento, 140 minutos que los fans y no tan fans disfrutaran, El Hobbit se auto nombra como otro clásico fantástico, Bien Hecho Peter Jackson, ojala dentro de los próximos años se animen a hacer el silmarillion y los hijos de hurin.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

RealPeopleDec 21, 2014

I LOVE the LOTR trilogy. I cried when it ended. I thoroughly enjoyed Unexpected Journey. The Desolation of Smaug turned me off( I rated DOS 6/10.) I was not looking forward to the final installment of the Hobbit. I, of course, was going toI LOVE the LOTR trilogy. I cried when it ended. I thoroughly enjoyed Unexpected Journey. The Desolation of Smaug turned me off( I rated DOS 6/10.) I was not looking forward to the final installment of the Hobbit. I, of course, was going to see the movie no matter what. This was a blessing. The reverse of expectation. Instead of expecting something special I went in without high demands. If you start to compare this movie to the beloved book your experience is doomed. If you want a three hour roller-coaster ride thinly based on the book your in for a treat. I saw the movie on Imax. Of all three movies you would expect this movie to be the best for Imax, it was not. A good sound system, a comfy seat, go for that, not 3D. I am a fan of the higher frame rate. The fact that it makes the scenes with practical effects look like a BBC documentary do not bother me. The fact that we get added scenes of high fantasy(elf on dwarf love) while leaving out touching fantasy like talking birds and wargs from the book do not bother me. This is not the Hobbit, this is the battle of the Five Armies from the director of King Kong 4.0. I had a blast, well worth the price of admission, the series will be missed. I also feel that practical effects will make a huge comeback due in part to this movie and others, and that is not a bad thing either. I shall look back on these Hobbit films fondly, for what the are, for what they lack. I did not get the sense of awe as I did with the LOTR films. I had no vested interest in Bilbo or the Dwarves this time around, and maybe that's for the best. I will re-read the book. I will watch Fellowship on blue-ray. The trilogy ended with a big smile on my face, no tears, but no regrets. A solid 8/10 for movie experience.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

zanithanJan 15, 2015

Reasonably engrossing and entertaining. No, it is not as good as the LOTR trilogy. But it is suspenseful and fun.

For those looking for a good action movie with fantasy elements then this is worth renting or going to the theaters to see ifReasonably engrossing and entertaining. No, it is not as good as the LOTR trilogy. But it is suspenseful and fun.

For those looking for a good action movie with fantasy elements then this is worth renting or going to the theaters to see if you have some cash and nothing better to do.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

FrogfisherFeb 25, 2015

The final chapter in the Hobbit-trilogy and Jackson's last Middle Earth film (for now), is a full out war brawl film in the vein of The Two Towers and Return of the King, and although not very faithful to it's own predecessors or the book itThe final chapter in the Hobbit-trilogy and Jackson's last Middle Earth film (for now), is a full out war brawl film in the vein of The Two Towers and Return of the King, and although not very faithful to it's own predecessors or the book it is based on, it is one hell of an action ride, far more to the point than the two prior films. While focus is misplaced on Bard and Thorin again, Bilbo gets some saying in the film and sets up the next trilogy a lot more subtle than one would expect from this trilogy. Issues come down to too many loose ends of which some are big obvious ones, actor performances, some confusion over various story elements and a truly cheesy "revelation scene" for Thorin. But the action and emotional impact makes the film stronger than Desolation of Smaug.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

WJSDec 17, 2014

This movie is very long...well it seems very long as it seems to be coming to end about 3 or 4 times and then on it goes, just like the third installment of "The Lord of the Rings" as it never wants to end. Mind you it looks and soundsThis movie is very long...well it seems very long as it seems to be coming to end about 3 or 4 times and then on it goes, just like the third installment of "The Lord of the Rings" as it never wants to end. Mind you it looks and sounds amazing and it's quite romantic. It's epic in its scope and it's visually stimulating but if you haven't seen "The Lord of the Rings", it might be confusing. The whole time I was watching I was thinking that Peter Jackson must be really tired of directing the same movie again, just like I was getting tired of watching the same movie over again. Unfortunately, I just didn't get into this movie as much as I hoped I would as I've been looking forward to seeing it for quite awhile...and although I was impressed with HFR 3D visual aspect it just seemed overwrought and heavy handed to me. Once you've seen one Orck get his head lopped off it all becomes quite redundant.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

ZarkanaDec 18, 2014

Among my friends no one takes the Middle Earth films more seriously than I do. Growing up with LOTR, and following the Hobbit through all of it's production, my anticipations were set very high. I genuinely loved the first movie, but did notAmong my friends no one takes the Middle Earth films more seriously than I do. Growing up with LOTR, and following the Hobbit through all of it's production, my anticipations were set very high. I genuinely loved the first movie, but did not like the pacing of the second. Honestly, I did not think the series would end on a good note. I was however proven wrong. The Battle of the Five Armies was a strong finish for the controversial hobbit films, and certainly made me excited to include them along side the Lord of the Rings series. Let's just wait for the extended editions!… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

8

BertoflyingfoxDec 21, 2014

I would say it's the weakest movie of all six films, but even then it's still good. The battles were spectacular, the dwarven army and it's leader Dain were great fun to watch on screen. Even though some of the sub-plotting wasnt to myI would say it's the weakest movie of all six films, but even then it's still good. The battles were spectacular, the dwarven army and it's leader Dain were great fun to watch on screen. Even though some of the sub-plotting wasnt to my liking, there were constant scenes sprinkled in-between that brought a smile to my face.

Beorn's scene and the overall final battle will be in my memory for a long while. Definitely watching it again.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

WARCHILDJan 13, 2015

Watched this one from the 3rd row, in high frame rate 3D. It was amazing detail and the best 3D experience I've had in a decade. Times running out if you haven't already had that experience, I fully recommend it.

The movie itself wasWatched this one from the 3rd row, in high frame rate 3D. It was amazing detail and the best 3D experience I've had in a decade. Times running out if you haven't already had that experience, I fully recommend it.

The movie itself was unsurprisingly great! You have to forgive the writers for their liberties and you have to read between the lines in the book to appreciate the movie. If you're "The book was better" type -- don't go. In the end, Tolkien would have either loved or hated all of the first and second trilogies. I for one thought the Hobbit was just as good as LOTR. No matter what the writers did, the acting in all three of the Hobbit films is superb.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

7

TVJerryDec 19, 2014

As you can discern from the title, there's a lot of action in this concluding installment: humans, dwarves, elves and one little hobbit face the evil Orcs in a massive fight for Middle-earth. Director Peter Jackson is a master storyteller,As you can discern from the title, there's a lot of action in this concluding installment: humans, dwarves, elves and one little hobbit face the evil Orcs in a massive fight for Middle-earth. Director Peter Jackson is a master storyteller, able to deftly weave massive spectacle with moments of personal sentiment. Martin Freeman (in the title role) charms with his whimsical personality. The fantasy world is visually dazzling and the pacing seldom lags, although the battles and the concluding drama go on too long. If you're a fan of the genre, you'll be thrilled with this grand finale.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

7

TheQuietGamerApr 23, 2015

The "defining chapter" turns out to be the weakest. If you were expecting Jackson to fix the complaints many had with the Hobbit trilogy here prepare to be let down. Even with it's flaws though there is still enough excitement here to make itThe "defining chapter" turns out to be the weakest. If you were expecting Jackson to fix the complaints many had with the Hobbit trilogy here prepare to be let down. Even with it's flaws though there is still enough excitement here to make it worth a watch for fantasy fans. Especially those with a love for Middle-Earth.

One of the biggest issues is evident right from the beginning. The film picks up right where the last left off with Smaugs attack. The opening just serves as a rather brief conclusion to that event. It is over so abruptly that it all feels anticlimactic. You quickly realize how this all should have been wrapped up in the last film while the intensity of Smaugs arrival was still fresh in our minds, rather than picking up where an unnecessary cliffhanger left off. The dragon just feels wasted.

From there we are left with waiting while a big battle builds up. The moments before blades start clashing deal with Thorin's descent into madness. These moments are slow, but deal with an interesting theme regarding the corruption of money.

Things pick up in the big battle, and believe me they pick up. Action is everywhere. One-on-one battles pack a level of excitement, tension, and absurd moments that are just a blast to watch. Just like the previous Hobbit movies Jackson has infused the combat with a certain amount of over-the-top goofiness. This at times gets in the way of the seriousness of the overall conflict, but it doesn't make the huge, lengthy battle any less fun to watch.

There is a more solemn tone when compared to the previous Hobbit movies that does more often than not clash with the more light-hearted tone of the trilogy. This leads to a movie that feels uneven. Thanks to the way it handles and wraps up the different plot threads it also can feel rushed.

However despite all of this I can't deny that I enjoyed another trip to Middle-Earth. Even if it wasn't as enjoyable as the others I've taken. The conclusion to the Hobbit trilogy wraps up on a pretty flawed note, but one that should still be enjoyable to those who have hung around this world.

I give "The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies" a 7.4/10.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

SkulbJan 3, 2015

To address one or two points from the other reviewers first:
1: Yes there were five armies: dwarves, humans, elves, orcs and eagles, as I think Tolkien himself explains either in The Hobbit, or quite possibly in LotR appendixes.
2: Yes theTo address one or two points from the other reviewers first:
1: Yes there were five armies: dwarves, humans, elves, orcs and eagles, as I think Tolkien himself explains either in The Hobbit, or quite possibly in LotR appendixes.
2: Yes the death of Smaug is an anti climax. It is therefore one of the most accurate adaptations of the book itself, in which the death of Smaug manages to be even more anti climactic.
3: The size of the respective armies was about right if you read Tolkien`s description of the battle. It was a much smaller affair than Dagorlad or even Helm`s Gate. And it was a hell of a lot smaller than Pelennor, and basically a skirmish by comparison. If anything the Battle of the Five Armies was too grand in the movie.
4: Tauriel is not a Tolkien character at all, but she and her absurd dwarf-elf love story have been invented and added by the deranged Fran Walsh, solely to appeal to the female demographic. It therefore doesn`t matter if she survives or what she might or might not do in the LotR story. She doesn`t exist and is the single most embarrassing thing about the Hobbit trilogy. I squirm with discomfort every single time I see her ridiculously pining face. If anything could tempt me to give these movies a low score it would be Tauriel. She is an insult to anyone who likes Tolkien.
5: The tired argument that a trilogy isn`t warranted. It`s not just The Hobbit but the prelude to LotR. One would have been a blur, two a rush and three fine. At least if it had been done right.

Apart from these confusions on behalf of other reviewers, the movie was a bit of a letdown after the previous two. Perhaps there just wasn`t a whole lot there once the dragon was dead. Whatever the case you get a bit too much orc vs architecture/humans/elves/dwarves slapstick CGI, Fran Walsh romance and for some odd reason a battle, which is supposedly the centerpiece of this movie, which has been altered in basically every single detail. To the best of my knowledge there was NO fighting of any kind inside Dale. Rather, there were supposed to be these two hills or ridges, humans holding out on one and elves on the other, and with the orcs coming down from the mountain along both ridges and in the valley between them. Instead the worms from Dune (Google it kiddies) made a surprise appearance as tunnellers for the orcs while the last parts of the battle took place on top of some CGI friendly ruin/pond I can also not remember ever hearing about before.
It`s a visually exciting but at times tedious movie which changes too many things for no reason. For instance, the master of Lake Town does not die at all in the book, but survives as Bard`s second in command. Still Jackson kills off Stephen Fry, one of the best comic assets available to him, after about ten minutes. Why? Orcs are feeble and unable to parry anything, which makes the audience start cheering for the hapless cretins instead of considering them credible threats. Every stinking time they get close to anyone with a name they go into slow motion, miss and die unceremoniously. Apart from Azog and Bolg they are all utterly useless and pathetic. They even get killed by women and children.

But most of the negatives concern small and essentially insignificant niggles with the narration and the script. The movie does so much right, both visually and audibly, is reasonably faithful to the source material, leads nicely into LotR like it was supposed to and produces some good performances by the actors, that all the 1s and 0s here are laughable. Bitter little haters out in force in time to gnaw at Peter Jackson like the maggots they are. The truth of the matter is that The Hobbit is not a particularly good book, at least not if you`re above twelve. Many of the shortcomings of the Hobbit trilogy stem from this fact, and from Tolkien`s inability or unwillingness to flesh things out with any sort of detail. Everything he ever did took a bird`s eye view of ME and was ridiculously understated. The exceptions are LotR which gets this part just right and The Hobbit, which is Bilbo`s navel gazing extravaganza for the children. If Bilbo doesn`t personally see it, it isn`t happening. And that`s why The Hobbit manages to not describe the Fall of Smaug or the Battle of the Five Armies at all. The first happens too far away from Bilbo and the second while he`s unconscious. This fact seems to be lost on the fake purists though.
So I don`t blame Jackson for imposing the LotR perspective on The Hobbit. In fact I don`t think he had any choice if he wanted to make a halfway watchable movie.
The worst part of the movie though was that the awful Orlando Bloom didn`t die this time either. I have been cheering for every orc he`s fought for six movies and have finally given up. Apparently this fart-smeller is just something you have to endure in stoic fashion if you want to watch PJ`s Middle Earth movies. I suppose it could have been worse. At least Jeff Goldblum isn`t in it.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

emirbudMar 18, 2015

I am actually quite content with the series. More so than the LOTR series, and the main reason is - I like the casting much better in this series. Choice of actors is far better that the LOTR. Martin Freeman is excellent as Bilbo (as opposedI am actually quite content with the series. More so than the LOTR series, and the main reason is - I like the casting much better in this series. Choice of actors is far better that the LOTR. Martin Freeman is excellent as Bilbo (as opposed to Frodo in LOTR who was awful), and Luke Evans should have been Aragorn in LOTR, however he's excellent as Bard. The others are just fine. I did not read the book - Hobbit (I tried, I just couldn't go on), and I think the movie is much better than the book, as opposed to LOTR where it's quite the opposite. Overall, fine trilogy.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

quincytheodoreDec 21, 2014

It may not rise to legendary prestige, but it is a fitting, and quite spectacular end to the trilogy. Like the prequel, The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies is rather long, some scenes are deliberately prolonged to buff the movie's length.It may not rise to legendary prestige, but it is a fitting, and quite spectacular end to the trilogy. Like the prequel, The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies is rather long, some scenes are deliberately prolonged to buff the movie's length. However, it does so with crisper action sequences and slightly faster pace. There are many characters in play, each taking turns for their moments in spotlight. They are not the fellowship, yet they mash together sufficiently well to ensure a dynamic cast. With good choreograph and special effect, even though it's longer than it needs be, the movie will still entertain till the end.

Story revolves around a recently dragon plagued mountain, the valuable gold residing there and its strategic position attract many armies to fight for its claim, hence the title. It gives some intricacy and politic maneuvering for the backdrop, none too overly complicated and they push the plot nicely. The movie switches attention neatly between Ian McKellen, Luke Evans, Richard Armitage, Orlando Bloom and Martin Freeman, all capable of leading a movie on their own. The prequels often had a character running in circle, thus wasting ten to fifteen minutes. Fortunately, this one divides the scenes with more focus, while it doesn't solve the plodding pace entirely, it ensures smoother transition between characters and their respective battles.

Visual is splendidly done. Both the large scale shots as well as the skirmishes have fluid motion to them. The orcs look pretty humanoid, the slimy giants are convincing as they nudge bricks and stones in their path. Some scenes do look digitized, but considering the height difference and intricate details involved, the movie does a good job of portraying the mythical battle. It doesn't rely too much on CG for closer combat, one of the better aspects it has over the predecessors is the scale of combat differs and it simply has more. Choreograph for these scuffle look good since it mixes CG and real stunt efficiently, it also utilizes 3D effect better.

The main issue is the same persisting one, it's too thin a script to divvy into two and half hour movie. There's bound to be some padding here and there, like how Thorin wallows in the mountain or shenanigans of some comedic relief, although it's not as bad as forty five minute soiree on Bilbo's house or needless hide-and-seek with Smaug. It fortifies the playtime with incredible feat of acrobat or destruction, few of them are quiet the reminiscence of Lord of the Ring. As half of the it consists of heated battle, it manages to not be dangerously tedious.

The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies can be faulted for not delivering what it's promised on the title. It certainly could trim some of its unnecessary dawdling, yet it delivers a marvelous enough last act for The Hobbit trilogy.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

Bruce722Dec 27, 2014

Unfortunately each successive installment of this Hobbit trilogy not only failed to build on the previous film but actually left even more to be desired. Yes, this is the film where the resolution finally comes to fruition. Yes, they did aUnfortunately each successive installment of this Hobbit trilogy not only failed to build on the previous film but actually left even more to be desired. Yes, this is the film where the resolution finally comes to fruition. Yes, they did a fantastic job connecting this trilogy to the amazing Lord of the Rings trilogy through this film. Yes, the action sequences, the special effects, and the acting were all top notch. But I can't help but feel like this movie just missed in a few key areas. The characters, for example, feel less authentic than in the previous films and, being that this is the movie where a lot of death and tragedy occurs, you're not connected or attached to them because of that. It also didn't have that key character who carries the movie. While Bilbo was this trilogies Frodo and they carry the narrative, neither actually carried the film through the action. In the LOTR films, Aragorn and Legolas did that. The problem with this trilogy is that Thorin is no Aragorn and Legolas isn't featured enough to compensate for that. You end up with Dwarves without sufficient development and essentially faceless elves and humans and none of it connects to the viewer on an emotional level. I also thought they didn't develop certain characters enough in this trilogy. I'm sorry but you shouldn't have to read the book or the expanded lore in order to appreciate a movie. Peter Jackson should've done a better job there. That being said, I think this movie, when marathoned with the previous installments, will resonate better. I just don't think it stood alone enough to live up to the epic standard already established in the universe.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

gamerzxJan 23, 2015

Brilliant movie. Based on what it's not.

Good movie good script. Deserves an 8. It's brilliant in what it isn't. It isn't the first 3 movies. The Fellowship etc. is a masterpiece of drama and action. The Hobbit series is not. What theBrilliant movie. Based on what it's not.

Good movie good script. Deserves an 8. It's brilliant in what it isn't. It isn't the first 3 movies. The Fellowship etc. is a masterpiece of drama and action. The Hobbit series is not.

What the Hobbit series is solid storytelling. From an unexpected party to Riddles in the dark. To Beorn's house to Bilbo's waking of smaug. The Battle of The Fiv Armies could have had more drama. It could have had more sorrow. More epic combat. It didn't. Waiting for Dwalin to swing a maul in epic fashion turned into Dwalin as an emotional wreck at the change in Thorin. Thorin could have led his Company in epic combat and fallen in battle slicing down Bolg's bodyguard. He didn't. He died in single combat. Not dramatic not epic. But brilliant.

The love story added is,well, Hollywood. It leaves the story intact, but it's bringing in an element of what might have been (and some women) to the movie. It also brings the elf army and dwarf army to light in solid fashion. The men are a little weak. Original and on the surface dull. All told Peter jackson and crew have lost nothing. Peter Jackson's directing neither takes from other movies nor outdoes them. Solid storytelling. Reminding us that the actors and audience as well as the genre lose nothing from these movies. They only gain.

I would have like to give it a 9 or 10. It doesn't deserve it. It deserves what is offered to us from the actors and crew. Something we can enjoy. Something they can be proud of achieving… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

beingryanjudeFeb 10, 2015

When looking at any of the three films in the Hobbit trilogy, it is unfair to constantly compare them to the brilliance of the original Lord of the Rings trilogy--we all know those are masterpieces. While the Hobbit series may not be, thisWhen looking at any of the three films in the Hobbit trilogy, it is unfair to constantly compare them to the brilliance of the original Lord of the Rings trilogy--we all know those are masterpieces. While the Hobbit series may not be, this final installment manages to capture much more of the adventure and excitement of the Hobbit novel. Peter Jackson and Co.'s decision to expand the Hobbit is justified very much so in this grand finale.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

theofficeDec 28, 2014

Probably more of a 7.5. The movie focused almost soley on the battle sequence and while pretty good still was drawn out with basically no character development. One thing I will never understand is how such a small force can beat back oneProbably more of a 7.5. The movie focused almost soley on the battle sequence and while pretty good still was drawn out with basically no character development. One thing I will never understand is how such a small force can beat back one about 100x larger. The orcs must be the most incompetent group ever. But really I still like the movie but probably more just because of the universe and characters. Of the bunch in the 6 movie series it is the worst but still very enjoyable and better than most movies out there. Just don't get that sense of awe and wonderment that I did with some of the others.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

JamesCannonDec 31, 2014

Simillarion! Simillarion!....5 season tv series. Told as a history of Middle Earth before the Lord of the Rings. All new actors. Five season to match the five chapters.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Jan 3, 2015

A proper sendoff to one of cinema's greatest worlds, "The Hobbit: The Battle Of The Five Armies" is rousing, well-paced, emotionally resonant, and chock-full of some truly fantastic sprawling set pieces.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

xTobyMcDec 23, 2014

I was surprisingly disappointed with this movie, it didn't live up to expectation. The movies now rely so heavily on animation/CGI that the realism is stripped away. I felt like Lord of the Rings (made over 10 years ago) had better visualI was surprisingly disappointed with this movie, it didn't live up to expectation. The movies now rely so heavily on animation/CGI that the realism is stripped away. I felt like Lord of the Rings (made over 10 years ago) had better visual appearance, the use of animated characters and scenery made this far to 'cartoony' for my liking. Of course The Hobbit isn't as brutal as Lord of the Rings, but I still feel it could have been a bit darker at times. This was like watching an action movie for 12 year olds, and of course people will disagree, but that's just my view of it.

The other thing that frustrated me was the cheesy behaviour of some characters. The dragon scene for example was pathetic, they made such a deal out of the dragon in the second movie, yet when he finally rises to the occasion he's completely underwhelming. For spoilers sake I cannot explain the particular scenes in detail, but you'll realise after watching it that some of the decisions and actions characters take lack so much common sense.

Overall the movie was satisfying, but nothing more. It really was the emphasis on CGI which ruined it for me as it wasn't even done to a good standard. Scenery looked unrealistic at times and enemies didn't feel real on the screen.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

callumjsouthDec 20, 2014

The Battle of the Five Armies is a good ending to Peter Jackson's Hobbit trilogy. We follow Bilbo Baggins for the last time, although in truth, Thorin Oakenshield feels like the major player in this instalment. The opening sequence isThe Battle of the Five Armies is a good ending to Peter Jackson's Hobbit trilogy. We follow Bilbo Baggins for the last time, although in truth, Thorin Oakenshield feels like the major player in this instalment. The opening sequence is brilliant and really does force you to raise your expectations immediately. It is masterfully executed and gives the film a strong platform. The acting is stellar in the most part, particularly from Freeman and Armitage. Unlike the previous instalments though, the final chapter lacks sufficient character development and seems too focused on attempting to brainwash our critical mind with numerous action sequences that are suffocated by CGI. These sequences certainly get the pulse raising, but cannot match the ever building suspense that made The Desolation of Smaug so good. The Desolation of Smaug had the right balance between action, suspense and characterization. The Battle of the Five Armies lacks this balance and appears to take a lot of emphasis away from suspense and characterization in favour of action, in order to create a film that can easily entertain kids. This is disappointing from a critical standpoint. From a customer standpoint though, you will feel satisfied that you easily got your money's worth.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

LeatherwoodJan 3, 2015

Fun movie to watch with alot of fighting and action. What more can you ask for, a good story. The story is pretty good, entertaining, and deep sort off. The transition between the Desolation of Smaug and the battle of the five armies wasFun movie to watch with alot of fighting and action. What more can you ask for, a good story. The story is pretty good, entertaining, and deep sort off. The transition between the Desolation of Smaug and the battle of the five armies was done well. My girlfriend dont even like fantasy, but she loves the hobbit. So take your girlfriend to the movies with a small popcorn, pop a hole at the bottom an enjoy.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

lukechristianscJan 11, 2015

The last Hobbit was a good til the twisted ending which i hated! But the i enjoyed the final chapter of J.R Tolken's series and i will miss Jackson's franchise. The battle sequences in The Battle of the Five Armies were so exciting,The last Hobbit was a good til the twisted ending which i hated! But the i enjoyed the final chapter of J.R Tolken's series and i will miss Jackson's franchise. The battle sequences in The Battle of the Five Armies were so exciting, thrilling to watch and so were the characters, Bilbo is still the same (which is good), Martin Freeman has the energy for Baggins. The Story is what put the popcorn in my mouth! and that's why we see this movie; Fans of the book will most likely dislike it cause some characters that aren't suppose to be in this one (a not needed), but don't blame screenwriters (Philppa Boyens,Fran Walsh, Peter Jackson and acclaimed Guillermo del Toro)!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

jacob4Jun 8, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A some what disappointing conclusion to The Hobbit trilogy filled with inaccuracies such as: characters dying the wrong way compared to how they died in the book, more than five armies battling each other, Tauriel and Legolas are still not part of the story, you only got to see Beorn fight as a bear for like five seconds and not kill Bolg like he did in the book, the Earth Eater worms that weren't even in the book, and the Eagle showing up to the rescue even though they didn't show up to the battle in the book. But still the movie had awesome battle scenes, spectacular effects, interesting characters, and heart tugging moments. Even though this movie wasn't like The Return of the King, it still would be nice to finish The Hobbit trilogy and see how it all ends. You know, this might just be the last Middle Earth movie you'll ever see. Unless they reboot the franchise, or make Shadow of Mordor or The Silmarillion into movies/… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

CPD98Dec 23, 2014

Aunque en los primeros 40 minutos hay palabrería que me sobra, el resto ofrece un buen espectáculo para cerrar de una vez las sagas de Tolkien. La saga de los anillos podría haber ido un poco mas al grano como a hecho el Hobbit, personalmenteAunque en los primeros 40 minutos hay palabrería que me sobra, el resto ofrece un buen espectáculo para cerrar de una vez las sagas de Tolkien. La saga de los anillos podría haber ido un poco mas al grano como a hecho el Hobbit, personalmente no me habría importado.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

JFaddJan 28, 2015

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. Spectacular. What else is there to say? It has Smaug's demise, the battle for the lonely mountain, and Bilbo returning home. That's all that needed to happen and that's what did...besides a fewThe Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. Spectacular. What else is there to say? It has Smaug's demise, the battle for the lonely mountain, and Bilbo returning home. That's all that needed to happen and that's what did...besides a few filler scenes with Radagast, Galadriel, and Saruman, but that's okay! Peter Jackson gave us something he said he would never do, and it is just as good as the Lord of the Rings.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

launchpad2132Dec 21, 2014

Allthough not as good as any LOTR movies, it had its moments. It also had its dull ones. There were times I felt Like it was a ten at times and a four at others. Thats why seven seems fair. I just felt like between the lack of effort put in,Allthough not as good as any LOTR movies, it had its moments. It also had its dull ones. There were times I felt Like it was a ten at times and a four at others. Thats why seven seems fair. I just felt like between the lack of effort put in, and the fact that threw 80% of the movie I wish it would have been just one movie. All in all though, this part of the book was so good, that even though the movie couldn't have been worse, the plot was still so epic it was worth seeing it.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

mrshoes74Jan 2, 2015

How the hell can anyone give a score of zero?!?!?!?!? Just because it was nothing like the book it gets a big fat zero. When are movies ever like the books hardly ever. I am sick and tired of idiots picking holes in movies when there isHow the hell can anyone give a score of zero?!?!?!?!? Just because it was nothing like the book it gets a big fat zero. When are movies ever like the books hardly ever. I am sick and tired of idiots picking holes in movies when there is nothing wrong with them. They are made for entertainment they are there for us to loose ourselves in. They are an experience and for me the LOTR movies are a triumph to be hold. The final part was spectacular it had everything in it. Great action set pieces terrific acting and a grand finale. To those who scored this zero you are pathetic.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

WRRJan 22, 2015

One of my favorite movies, The Hobbit the Battle of the Five Armies was a chapter from the end of the Hobbit book made into a whole movie. Epic, perfect computer animation, you will find it here. Sure, it had it's issues. Azog was notOne of my favorite movies, The Hobbit the Battle of the Five Armies was a chapter from the end of the Hobbit book made into a whole movie. Epic, perfect computer animation, you will find it here. Sure, it had it's issues. Azog was not supposed to be in the movies. But that was (in my opinion) one of the two best movies of 2014.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

Ryzoft_StipeJan 26, 2015

The movie is unfinished, and completely looks like rushed. Most of the things were unexplained, but overall, is good. To be honest, I was dissapointed, especially when they devoted very little time to the scene Gandalf tells Bilbo he knowsThe movie is unfinished, and completely looks like rushed. Most of the things were unexplained, but overall, is good. To be honest, I was dissapointed, especially when they devoted very little time to the scene Gandalf tells Bilbo he knows about the ring.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Go_LogicDec 23, 2014

A spectacular ending to a brilliant saga. The dragon is destroyed and the battle of the five armies commences.

It differs in textual origin from other pieces in the trilogy and eventually ends up winding down the clock, but with suchA spectacular ending to a brilliant saga. The dragon is destroyed and the battle of the five armies commences.

It differs in textual origin from other pieces in the trilogy and eventually ends up winding down the clock, but with such ferocity that it barely goes unnoticed. But I gave it an 8; It being produced by Peter Jackson, and we all know how much work he has put into this masterpiece.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

PenguenPrensDec 20, 2014

The last chapter of the trilogy the Battle of the Five Armies makes a strong entry. While I have to say I agree with some critics complaining about the opening scene and it's necessity of being in this chapter rather than the previous , IThe last chapter of the trilogy the Battle of the Five Armies makes a strong entry. While I have to say I agree with some critics complaining about the opening scene and it's necessity of being in this chapter rather than the previous , I personally did not have much issue with this. In any case, the BotFA makes a terrific beginning and turns into a disaster movie like Titanic with the dragon and its destruction added.

The things we see until the battle actually starts builds up the tension quite nicely but as soon as the battle starts, things become to fall apart. Never-ending one on one fights, meaningless dialogs and some scenes during the battle that don't tie up very well pull the movie down. While the CGI is not a big issue this time and looks clean enough, there are still some cartoonish action scenes that don't make sense. The Desolation of Smaug had lots of scenes that weren't in the book and they were pretty much all bad and didn't add anything to the story. This chapter though presents some of the best newly invented scenes in all six Peter Jackson movies.

The Battle of the Five Armies is not the Return of the King to a trilogy that isn't the Lord of the Rings. The battle and the struggle don't make you feel excited like the battle for the One Ring. It's not just because you hardly feel like choosing a side in this selfish war but also because PJ couldn't make his magic work this time and everything you see feels like overly done and it only proves that no matter how big of a fan you are of Tolkien, you can only take so much.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

KoshkDec 23, 2014

Best Movie of the year!!!!
This is an epic ending to the Hobbit saga. It stays true to the book and makes you want to watch the whole Lord of The Rings Trilogy all over again. The effects were really great and made me want to go to MiddleBest Movie of the year!!!!
This is an epic ending to the Hobbit saga. It stays true to the book and makes you want to watch the whole Lord of The Rings Trilogy all over again. The effects were really great and made me want to go to Middle Earth myself. All the Hobbit movies were great. From Bilbo finding the One Ring to Smaug getting shot by Bard and flying dead into Lake Town. The amazing story of the Hobbit has been brought to life by Peter Jackson in an Amazing way.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

BillEffinMurrayDec 23, 2014

I rather enjoyed it. A little too much CGI for my tastes, but I definitely had fun seeing the movie and would watch it again. Don't look too much into the people giving it a 10 or a 0 for a score. Trust me.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Thestew4088Dec 26, 2014

The Hobbit is a fitting end to the Middle earth legend. Great battle scenes made the movie. Like most people, I think the The hobbit should've been two movies, but Peter Jackson has made the last visit to Middle Earth an enjoyable one.

TheThe Hobbit is a fitting end to the Middle earth legend. Great battle scenes made the movie. Like most people, I think the The hobbit should've been two movies, but Peter Jackson has made the last visit to Middle Earth an enjoyable one.

The CGI was so bad that I thought that i was watching a Video Game walkthrough at some stages. Nevertheless, Peter Jackson has brought a great middle earth based movie and, in my opinion, he hasn't dissapointed.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Splinter129Dec 27, 2014

An epic, sad, and fitting final chapter to the trilogy! Lots of people, especially critics, have missed the big picture of the movie especially the franchise. I have been a fan of Middle-Earth since LOTR: The Fellowship of the Ring, and inAn epic, sad, and fitting final chapter to the trilogy! Lots of people, especially critics, have missed the big picture of the movie especially the franchise. I have been a fan of Middle-Earth since LOTR: The Fellowship of the Ring, and in 2012, seeing the first Hobbit movie, I was full of excitement and was thrilled. The second one had more tension build and was just a bowl of fun to watch with a terrifying ending knowing that Smaug has went in full rage mode, wondering what exactly is going to happen; and the third one just left us with a jaw dropping and battle- raging conclusion to the triology, and connects well with The Fellowship of the Ring. Sure there was not much of a huge plot in this final film, but have you read the last few chapters of The Hobbit book that the movie is based of from? Its nothing but a battle and a goodbye from Bilbo returning back to the Shire, just as the movie shows. Now my true rating to the movie is a 8.5/10, as there were some flaws in the film itself like the love scenes with Kili and Tauriel, even though it could of been worse (a better love story than Twilight no doubt), and there is not that much closure to the ending of the film. I think critics have been too harsh on the film that I have to bump the film's rating up to a 10. But the Extended Edition could very much likely make the movie itself better, just as the Extended Edition for The Return of the King did. Overall, I love the Hobbit trilogy, despite the flaws, will still prefer the LOTR trilogy, but it is a fitting prequel, and should NOT be compared to the Star Wars prequels.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

AndImJavertDec 27, 2014

Well, we're sadly at the end of another journey into our beloved Middle Earth. While the Hobbit trilogy is obviously not as grand or great as the Lord of the Rings films were, I think they get far more hate than they deserve. I loved AnWell, we're sadly at the end of another journey into our beloved Middle Earth. While the Hobbit trilogy is obviously not as grand or great as the Lord of the Rings films were, I think they get far more hate than they deserve. I loved An Unexpected Journey, had quite a few problems with Desolation of Smaug, and went into Battle of the Five Armies with both absurd amounts of hype and doubt. Let me start of by saying that Battle of the Five Armies is definitely worth your time and money and you should go see it as soon as possible.

After the disappointment of Desolation, I went into BOTFA expecting it to be one long visually exhausting CGI filled action scene with characters that didn't have enough development or emphasis. I was partly correct. If you like action scenes then this is the movie for you. Once the battle gets started, it stops for nothing. My problem with all of this however, is that it was hard to get invested in the majority of the battles. I was seeing all of this carnage and action, but it all felt boring. A lot of the action was between people we don't know or care about. Obviously we're routing for the Elves/Dwarves/Men but when they're just a bunch of iffy looking CGI characters that we haven't met, it's hard to invest yourself in the battles. I'll take Aragorn struggling to take down Lurtz any day of the week over the vastest green screen battle that could be created on a computer. Sometimes, less is a hell of a lot more.

That being said, the action scenes with characters that we've met and care for, are simply amazing. Most of us have read the book, but even still it's difficult to not feel tension when Bard hops across rooftops to avoid Smaug's fiery breath. It's hard to not hope against all odds that a certain three Dwarves won't meet their deaths in battle. It's just my personal preference, but I prefer action that is rooted in characters. I'm not a huge fan of action for the sake of action. That's the great thing about BOTFA though, it has plenty of both and it is sure to please people on both sides of the spectrum.

Strangely enough, the strongest aspects of BOTFA are the moments that I thought would be done the worst. The characters. The main reason I loved An Unexpected Journey was because of all the little moments with the characters. When the characters, especially Bilbo, took a backseat to let the CGI action take over in Desolation of Smaug, I was concerned about how BOTFA would turn out. To put it bluntly, I could not have been more wrong. The performances in Battle of the Five Armies are the strongest in the entire trilogy. Martin Freeman is wonderful as Bilbo as per usual, I only wish we got to see more of him. Richard Armitage, the actor who plays Thorin Oakenshield, deserves an Oscar nomination for his performance in this. To restate it, BOTFA appeals to not only the action lovers but the character lovers as well.

At this point we should all realize what the Hobbit movies really are. They're well intentioned Middle Earth adventure movies that really only want to make us smile. They're not malicious, lazy cash grabs like the Star Wars prequels, which for some reason people love to compare the Hobbit movies to. The Hobbit trilogy wasn't made for the sole purpose of making money, they were made to tell a story, even if the story got a bit too bloated and heavy for it's own good. They were made so that we could all revisit the beautiful land of Middle Earth one last time. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Although it's not perfect, Battle of the Five Armies is a well crafted, emotionally wrenching, action filled ending to a slightly flawed but still excellent trilogy.

Pros:
- Excellent performances
- Emotionally involving
- Sense of payoff
- Fan service (Hey it's not a bad thing, okay.)
- Tied in well to Lord of the Rings

Cons:
- Visually exhausting and cluttered battles
- Some moments of very noticeable/bad CGI
- Lack of Martin Freeman… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews