The Great Wall

Universal Pictures | Release Date: February 17, 2017

5.7	USER SCORE Mixed or average reviews based on 267 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

iCronicAug 9, 2017

If it weren't for the very good 3D Action scenes this would be a 1/2 star film. I got goosebumps of how bad the rest was. I also watched this in D-Box seats, fun at the beginning but annoying later on, definitely not worth it

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

shpostalFeb 18, 2017

I thought that if Matt Damon was in this movie it may not be too bad. That's what I get for thinking. The movie has its moments, particularly in the settings, including some beautiful badlands that really do exist there, and theI thought that if Matt Damon was in this movie it may not be too bad. That's what I get for thinking. The movie has its moments, particularly in the settings, including some beautiful badlands that really do exist there, and the pageantry of the armies in the wall fortifications was impressive. But sooner or later we have to get to the plot. Ewwwww. Ultra bad lizard beings try to breach the wall and kill and eat everything and everybody. So much for the spoiler, because that's basically it, and Damon's role as a mercenary turned good guy to help the Chinese beat these greenies. The dialogue couldn't be more lame, and even the presence of a very pretty commander doesn't help. I really don't understand Hollywood. How they can turn out brilliant work one minute and then take a movie that could have been better if it had more than a video game plot and make us groan is a mystery. Damon can and has done so much better - this is one of his low points in his career. This turkey will be hitting the pay cable channels and DVD's fairly quickly like other Hollywood bombs do. I wouldn't even wait to see it then.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

AvodeskormFeb 27, 2017

I believe this director is known for making beautifully shot action-romance films, but you wouldn't be able to tell as the film fails to deliver on all aspects. I think the director just thought, this would look cool with CGI. TypicalI believe this director is known for making beautifully shot action-romance films, but you wouldn't be able to tell as the film fails to deliver on all aspects. I think the director just thought, this would look cool with CGI. Typical conventional trashy hollywood film.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

XelanakMar 3, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The special effects were good,the musics and costumes were great but...
It was really boring, Matt Damon wasnt really that good here and why him ??? Only the first battle made me enjoy but after this ...
i was really dissapointed.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

imthenoobMay 25, 2017

Unoriginal story, Terrible over acting, and awful looking visuals. If Matt Damon's name wasn't attached to this, No one would have even bothered seeing it. It's absolutely trash. I honestly don't know why they bothered making this film.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

dcutlerApr 2, 2017

I thought that this was an Awful movie that tried way to hard to make the movie serious. I thought that because they had a couple good actors in there that it might be okay, but No it was horrible.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

Generarl_ZassFeb 24, 2017

An American came to china search for the cure of Mexicans. What a racist reflection!
The characters are hollow
no development
weird frame
60 years of preparation

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

KadeemluvmusicFeb 17, 2017

It was boring. Absolutely boring. Why did Hollywood wanted to choose Matt Damon with this cheese-fest? The thing is, I felt that The Great Wall should've been the next Last Samurai of greatness, but it's now turned it into Gods Of Egypt 2.0:It was boring. Absolutely boring. Why did Hollywood wanted to choose Matt Damon with this cheese-fest? The thing is, I felt that The Great Wall should've been the next Last Samurai of greatness, but it's now turned it into Gods Of Egypt 2.0: How to whitewashed an actor's character. It made no sense at all. The characters are annoying, wasted CGI, the story is a jumbled turd, and way too many cringeworthy plot holes. Yeah, this should probably be the worst movie of 2017. Skip it.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

ourtimehascomeNov 27, 2017

The Great Wall is entirely unnecessary. With terrible acting (especially Matt Damon), tedious action, and awful SFX, it creates yet another Hollywood bore.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

LeZeeAug 18, 2017

Decent visuals, but has no fresh vision.

I always thought what they call the great wall of China is the symbol of the Chinese scary-ism against the mighty Mongolians in the ancient time. So when I first saw this trailer, I shocked and then IDecent visuals, but has no fresh vision.

I always thought what they call the great wall of China is the symbol of the Chinese scary-ism against the mighty Mongolians in the ancient time. So when I first saw this trailer, I shocked and then I said: what the heck. You can't just hide the truth and recreate whatever new thing you want. But That's how the China and Chinese evolved for thousands of years. Like it could be martial arts, rice, noodles or the dragon, all of them came from outside. Then when I saw the film, the first scene itself cleared my doubt. It states the film was based on the legend. I thought it was a good start after the misleading promos.

So this is China's effort to make a product at home par with Hollywood. They had hired top technicians from the west, that's including Matt Damon. With this kind of attempt, they should have triumphed. Yeah, the graphics were good and then if you check it out the end credits, it was actually not a pure Chinese made product as what we see on the screen, which was 99 per cent Chinese cast. 'Kung Fu Yoga' is a fine example, what the made in China looks like.

The director is known for traditional films, like mixing art, martial arts and culture, particularly the middle age. I like his films of the 00s, but this one was utterly commercial crap. When it comes to the ideas for the scenes, every segment and every frame reminded me some Hollywood's greatest graphic film from the recent decade. Particularly the monsters as the zombies from 'World War Z' and the Chinese soldiers totally replicates the Elves of Woodland Realm. That proves, the Chinese are masters of copying/duplicating. IT HAS A DECENT VISUAL, BUT NOT FRESH VISION. They should have handed it over entirely, except producing it for the better outcome.

It is the early 11th century, at one of the sections of northern China wall, where a couple of white men caught by the Chinese army after they were chased by a group of bandits. They have come with an agenda, but there's something big is going on. First, they have to win the Chinese trust and so they succeed on that, but things changes as the weather of the place has changed. Besides, they have no choice than to cooperate with them, but then the differences divide the two men. Who takes what path and their fates are decided at the film's climax.

❝They have trained all their lives for this war.❞

Many western actors, filmmakers had tried their luck in Chinese filmdom, but not all were succeeded. Tapping Chinese market is not that simple. There are too many complications like restriction in thematic and using content in the story. If that complies, then they must use Chinese cast and crew for some percentage. From all, the greatest surprise was, like Jimmy Kimmel said, why would Damon had given up the Oscar award winning role from his own production for this cheap flick from the east.

I always appreciate the good films, no matter where it had come from. It all depends on the quality and the contents, but sometimes there is exemption if the production was under a limited, small cost. There's no such excuse for this film. Besides my issue was not the graphics, except borrowing the ideas from others, but it was the poor screenplay. You can clearly say that I'm not happy with this one. This is just another film that looks like a computer game as similar to the 'Resident Evil' film series.

The west had given up on digital 3D, but China has a special obsession with that, and so am I. That is the reason those failed films, bet against the Dollars, which were strongly influenced by that technology, such as 'Age of Extinction', 'Warcraft' et cetera survived by earning Yuan. Like I mentioned, the director is not this kind of cheap filmmaker. But it clearly understandable that he wanted to give what the domestic audience wanted, a good digital 3D film. For that, it has to be full scale action-adventure, not filled with drama kind he's famous for.

This film lacks character developments, as well as the story. You might enjoy it if you like actions. Even though, many of them are silly like acrobat women jumping down to just kill one-two monsters. On the other hand, they are the baits without followup strategic offense. Hence well planned suicide. Like that, they just wanted to give some actions without any logic behind. The common man like Chinese people (Common means Communism; definition) might be fooled, not the rest of the world. So this film is not everybody's suitable. It is a watchable film, but why? No worth at all.

3/10… Expand