The Great Beauty

Janus Films | Release Date: November 15, 2013

8.1	USER SCORE Universal acclaim based on 209 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

AkumaJackApr 27, 2018

This film has almost no purpose. There's no clear meaning at the end of the day and it doesn't talk about anything. I think that was the idea of Sorrentino because he also says something along those lines with Jep as a mouthspeaker. But theThis film has almost no purpose. There's no clear meaning at the end of the day and it doesn't talk about anything. I think that was the idea of Sorrentino because he also says something along those lines with Jep as a mouthspeaker. But the fact is that this film is quite boring and slow, with a lot of meaningless shots that are typical of Sorrentino's works. Great aesthetics but overall pointless.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

DawdlingPoetNov 27, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is very much an arty film, a bit like The Square. There are some nice instances of cinematography present. Some scenes are surprisingly quiet and the visual imagery sort of speaks for itself, in a sense. I liked the classical style/operatic music played at times. It did seem to be a bit pretentious and I think it's fair to say that some of the script is a little...quirky, shall I say. I reckon its about identity, self-identity and the identity of the area its set in (Rome, Italy). There is a seediness to some of it. The main characters are mostly middle-aged to elderly men, Italian men and I certainly didn't feel much in the way of empathy towards them, given some of what's talked about. It's somewhat thoughtful and I suppose it is a bit atmospheric. There's an interesting scene featuring a young-ish child, a girl all but attacking a large white sheet with a variety of different coloured paint, as if defending herself against it. It is not the most...clear or accessible film as such, I think its fair to say but its certainly not without any interesting aspects. There is a certain poignancy in the 2nd half of the film too, certainly towards the end of the film, although i won't go into any details so as not to spoil it for others. Some scenes are quite darkly lit, adding to the sombre sense it has.

Overall, its certainly not a bad film but its not an especially great one as such, certainly from the get go. Its ok, with some pretty good moments but its not one of the most memorable films I've seen overall. I wouldn't go out of my way to see it as such but if you enjoy films of this type then its probably worth catching if its on TV, that sort of thing, otherwise perhaps not. I liked the end credits for the background shown while their on screen. I hope this helps.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

TVJerryFeb 10, 2014

This Italian nomination for Best Foreign Film follows a man who's just turned 65. He wrote one successful novel years ago and still spends his days moving in society's circles: dancing at wild parties, having useless conversations, viewingThis Italian nomination for Best Foreign Film follows a man who's just turned 65. He wrote one successful novel years ago and still spends his days moving in society's circles: dancing at wild parties, having useless conversations, viewing performance art and questioning it all. If you're familiar with Fellini you'll see his touches all over: sumptuous images of Roman life and locations, freaky characters and incongruous imagery all combined in glimpses, not in linear narrative. On the other hand, the film is missing the master's magic. If you're into art films, this might appeal. I found it beautiful to behold, but oh so tedious, labored and indulgent. (At Criterion Cinemas only.)… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

netflicDec 21, 2013

There is plenty of beauty in this movie, no doubt. I think the director of this movie was trying to make a Fellini-like film, in which he (to some extent) succeeded. The cinematography is brilliant there, but in my opinion, a good movie needsThere is plenty of beauty in this movie, no doubt. I think the director of this movie was trying to make a Fellini-like film, in which he (to some extent) succeeded. The cinematography is brilliant there, but in my opinion, a good movie needs not only a form, no matter how outstanding it is, but some substance as well. And there is none of it, just a stream of consciousness, which is quite popular among professional critics. But I am not a critic, I am just a guy who likes good movies, and this is not one of them.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

NightReviewsFeb 13, 2014

“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” This remains to be one of my favourite idioms of all time. The beauty of art is very rarely understood unanimously or collectively, instead it becomes an expression of human beings that flourishes“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” This remains to be one of my favourite idioms of all time. The beauty of art is very rarely understood unanimously or collectively, instead it becomes an expression of human beings that flourishes through argument, rebuttals and questions. Fortunately, the same can be said with the film in review. One of the many beauties of The Great Beauty remains to be it’s amazing ability to allow the perceptions of many to decide the beauty and horror that is contained in it’s small, avant-garde shell.

More often than not, the film is a collection of images, situations and nuances where it’s meaning is just as dumbfounding or interpretative as any abstract portrait or painting. From scenes involving a magician disappearing a giraffe where the payoff is never explained, an opera choir singing whilst an Asian tourist falls face-first, dead, or the image of a capsized boat in the water off the coast of Rome, there are more than just a few instances where the film itself is a colourful and fantastical ode to the late great Federico Fellini. Rather than just being a Fellini wannabe film, writer/director Paolo Sorrentino gives us a glimpse into the many questionable lifestyle formulas within the epicentre of Italy’s posh social elites, the city of Rome.

The film is driven by way of high-class professional socialite Jep Gambardella (Toni Servillo), a rousing misogynist, or what he prefers to be called, a misanthrope, whose life since the age of twenty-six has surrounded the snobby upper-class Italian elite and their artistic appetites. Jep is a writer who is still riding the waves of success from his first and only book, L’Apparato Umano (The Human Apparatus), and whose presence is still heavily felt in Rome. Like so many great writers, Jep is completely aware of his potential to impact the lives of others, yet rather than embrace his talent, he prefers to use his status as a dignified God-like scribe for the sake of…nothing really. As he struts his fine-tailored suit throughout the underbelly of Rome’s busy nightlife and sleeps while Rome’s financially struggling lower and middle class work, Jep enjoy his life drinking, smoking, sleeping, eating, socializing, and complaining about the trivial matters that plague the Italian upper-class. As Jep narrates, “It’s all settled beneath the chitter chatter and the noise, silence and sentiment, emotion and fear. The haggard, inconstant flashes of beauty. And then the wretched squalor and miserable humanity. All buried under the cover of the embarrassment of being in the world”. Exactly.

Contrary to it’s marketing and promotional material, the film itself is beautifully shot, but far from following any sort of linear storyline. Jumping in and out of flash-backs of Jep’s youth, the film is a vessel to understanding Italy’s obsession with keepin up appearances, and actually has less to do with Jep’s life as a whole. The film is loaded with scenes involving examples of ridiculous high art practices; from wall-slamming nude women, knife-throwing gypsy men, and volatile little girls throwing paint cans onto a blank canvas. The Great Beauty is a film whose commentary on the ridiculousness of Rome’s posh few are questioned and palpable, not because of it’s unbelievability, but more-so for it’s deep-rootedness in truth and reality. I have personally never been to Rome, or Italy for that matter, but much like the film itself, Sorrentino allows audience members to envision Rome in the same way he uses it; as a portable backdrop for the countless fashion photo shoots, bizarre street art performers and a stage for the operatic.

Aside from the people, there is a richness underneath The Great Beauty, which is its commentary on beauty itself. Dabbing into the world of plastic surgery, clubbing, and high-art, Sorrentino’s lens is a tell-all opening to the very haggard and inconstant flashes of beauty that become borderline repulsive and monstrous. Eventually, everyone surrounding Jep becomes more and more inhuman and almost caricature like, far from Jep’s initial desires. It is not until one of Jep’s previous lovers dies where Jep is, pulled back into the world where everyone, including himself, is in search for the great beauty of life.

Although it’s title may be The Great Beauty, the film itself becomes a de-glamourization and far-fetched reality of the abusive and overindulgent spectacle of a frivolous and uncaring class of socialites. The Great Beauty is undoubtedly an intricate and wholly cinematic apparatus, but, as Jep says, it is also just a film that highlights Italy’s “blah, blah, blah…” in high manner and fashion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews