The Gentlemen

8

GazMoviesSep 29, 2020

If you don't like Guy Ritchie movies I don't think you will like this. It couldn't be anyone else's film very stylised. British gangster movie that doesn't take itself to seriously. Hugh Grant was really good in this it is a different roleIf you don't like Guy Ritchie movies I don't think you will like this. It couldn't be anyone else's film very stylised. British gangster movie that doesn't take itself to seriously. Hugh Grant was really good in this it is a different role for him to play.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

CalledByCthulhuOct 16, 2020

We don't appreciate Guy Ritchie enough. He's produced the goods yet again. The script is funny and fresh. The direction is brilliant. Grant, McConaughey and Hunnam are captivating. Don't miss this (unless you are allergic to profanity).

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

MryousefpourJan 3, 2021

Excellent movie, beautiful acting, amazing ending.
I would like to give it 8 because it kept surprising me with great happenings and special type of comedy

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

RathlanMay 2, 2021

I've watched this twice now and have been genuinely entertained both times. Each character is brilliantly conceived, well scripted and well acted. You do need to concentrate but the pieces all come together well at the end. We ended upI've watched this twice now and have been genuinely entertained both times. Each character is brilliantly conceived, well scripted and well acted. You do need to concentrate but the pieces all come together well at the end. We ended up taking about this the next day, which is always a good sign.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

FearinatorMay 8, 2021

Great active with epic Guy Richie dialog. Brilliant chemistry between the three main actors. Fun pacing and great action. Must see!

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

Gamzguy17Aug 21, 2021

With some preposterous plot moments aside, "The Gentlemen" is diabolically entertaining with director Ritchie deliberately being cynical.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

liamexeAug 19, 2022

I didn't have high hopes when I saw this. I am a fan of Ritchie, and I had heard excellent things about the movie. However, after seeing a few trailers, I didn't feel very excited.

I'm happy I gave it a shot. The script for the movie isI didn't have high hopes when I saw this. I am a fan of Ritchie, and I had heard excellent things about the movie. However, after seeing a few trailers, I didn't feel very excited.

I'm happy I gave it a shot. The script for the movie is superb. It's absurd that Hugh Grant is the star when there are so many outstanding performances. Give this movie a chance if you're on the fence as I was. You won't be sorry.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

puqMay 16, 2022

Sets the story up for a brand new sequel. Story was super nicely set up for commoners of the "manly men movies". Very well filmed, some confusing story elements, and some weird shots, but nothing that needed changing looking how the storySets the story up for a brand new sequel. Story was super nicely set up for commoners of the "manly men movies". Very well filmed, some confusing story elements, and some weird shots, but nothing that needed changing looking how the story turned out. The director obviously had a big part of this movie and I really respect it. Many fight scenes that are fully respected by me. Very good movie. Can't wait for the sequel (if there is one)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

bean141Jul 1, 2022

Its not perfect but was mostly a really fun film. Some story points, and scenes felt a little shallow, but the really good acting, entertaining characters and just overall enjoyable style, made it a well above average and enjoyable film

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TVJerryJan 25, 2020

Matthew McConaughey heads this mostly-British cast as an American in London, who runs a very profitable marijuana empire. When he decides to sell it, all manner of schemes comprise the twisty plot. Given that the director is Guy Ritchie,Matthew McConaughey heads this mostly-British cast as an American in London, who runs a very profitable marijuana empire. When he decides to sell it, all manner of schemes comprise the twisty plot. Given that the director is Guy Ritchie, whose career started with this kind of brash, violent, streetwise scenario, it's interesting to see him back at it. Albeit, a bit more restrained in the pacing and violence. There's still plenty of fun in some of the characterizations (esp. Hugh Grant) and some moments of cinematic snazz. Even though Ritchie has certainly mellowed a bit, he hasn't lost his ability to craft an enjoyable, offbeat caper.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

dharmaMay 29, 2021

Ritchie's return to the crime caper flicks that made him a household name is essentially what you expect. Well acted, talky, and a lot less smarter than it actually is. Its biggest weakness is that Ritchie has always tried to emulateRitchie's return to the crime caper flicks that made him a household name is essentially what you expect. Well acted, talky, and a lot less smarter than it actually is. Its biggest weakness is that Ritchie has always tried to emulate Tarantino's style and his mixed up timeline, but never really getting it right. It took such a long time setting things up that I literally got bored on its first half. After that though, things started to move at a more brisk clip, with a pretty good finale to wrap things up. A good watch, but nothing new here.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

Compi24Feb 4, 2020

Though some have found "The Gentlemen" to be a showcase of writer/director Guy Ritchie at his most entry level, it just so happens to be exactly what this reviewer was asking for all along. As someone who's clung so unabashedly to the notionThough some have found "The Gentlemen" to be a showcase of writer/director Guy Ritchie at his most entry level, it just so happens to be exactly what this reviewer was asking for all along. As someone who's clung so unabashedly to the notion that his "Sherlock Holmes" films are the best things he's ever done, I was wary of this return to the early days for Ritchie. I don't particularly dislike movies like "Lock, Stock," "Snatch" or "RocknRolla." I just find them a bit too showy and brash for my tastes. However, it seems the skills accrued via those jaunts through studio-dom have perhaps melded with the indie sensibilities that were already so present within the man. And the movie's all better for it. Yes, "The Gentlemen" is still undeniably Ritchie, but with just the right amount of focus, tact and accessibility to make even the most fervent of Ritchie-deniers leave the theater feeling satisfied. As shocked as I am to say this, I have to admit - I honestly think this is my favorite of the "proper" Guy Ritchie gangster flicks.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

mrc_brnJan 27, 2020

Thoroughly enjoyable gangster flick with great dialogues, wacky characters, surprising and often funny plot twists and a creative and dynamic story telling. A bit uneven perhaps, some scenes absolutely hilarious, but also a few tedious ones.Thoroughly enjoyable gangster flick with great dialogues, wacky characters, surprising and often funny plot twists and a creative and dynamic story telling. A bit uneven perhaps, some scenes absolutely hilarious, but also a few tedious ones. Biggest knock for me was that I didn't care for the main character (McConnaughey) as I did for the fringe ones. Collin Farrell and his 'crew' and Hugh Grant in particular stole every scene they were in. Very worth while watch.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

MattBrady99Feb 3, 2020

“You really can't unsee it once you've seen it.” Guy Ritchie returns to his gangster roots in the underbelly of jolly good England. It’s crazy to think that this is the same guy who brought us last years ‘Aladdin.’ But this time Ritchie isn’t“You really can't unsee it once you've seen it.” Guy Ritchie returns to his gangster roots in the underbelly of jolly good England. It’s crazy to think that this is the same guy who brought us last years ‘Aladdin.’ But this time Ritchie isn’t on a leash.

I honestly didn’t expect to enjoy ‘The Gentleman’ as much as I did. A little muddle and sometimes confusing to follow, but the movie has a certain sharpness to it that kept me interested throughout. It’s more in vein with ‘Lock Shock’ and ‘Snatch’. Ritchie has made a successful career being influenced by the work of Quentin Tarantino, hence his given title “British Tarantino”. The cast are all having an absolute blast with the material and I can tell everyone wants to be there. Hugh Grant is my personal favorite out of the cast and it’s great to see his enthusiasm in acting again. He plays Fletcher, a gay detective who documents the events in the story into a screenplay he’s writing, so in a way it’s told from his perspective. While debatable if everything in the movie was made up or not, cause “every movie needs a bit of action”. The thing I love about Grants performance is that he isn’t playing "typical Hugh Grant", but an actual character. Although I thought the running gag of him being openly gay and constantly makes flirty hints towards other male characters got old and awkward after awhile. A joke that out stay’s it’s welcome...kinda like Fletcher.

I’m not a big fan of Charlie Hunnam as an actor, as I usually find him bland in everything I’ve seen him so far. However I thought Hunnam delivered a solid performance in this movie and might be his best. He plays Ray, Mickey’s (McConaughey) right hand man who is professional when it comes to business despite the countless idiots in his path. Imagine Russell Bufalino from ‘The Irishman’, but more physical and incredibly British. His comedic timing was pretty good as well that maybe if you give him the right material and character, he’s a better actor than I thought.

Colin Farrell was terrific as Coach and my second favorite out of the cast. He’s ridiculously cool and shows who’s boss, but also display’s some comedic chops. Matthew McConaughey was chilled as Mickey, who is the weed Lord of England that likes things in green, which is money and marijuana. Out of all the colorful characters in the movie, I thought Mickey was the least interesting if I have to be honest. Either because of McConaughey's chilled nature or the less exciting material given to his character. The style and overall tone of the movie made the whole experience so fun to watch. Everything about the movie is quick. The dialogue is snappy and there’s plenty of clever banter between characters. It’s incredibly clear that Guy Richie loves cinema whenever he’s not held back like some of his previous projects and gets to freely express his passion behind the craft. The humor and jokes ain't for the faint of heart, but luckily I’m not that soft. Some of jokes didn’t quite land the mark and often times left me puzzled in terms of waiting for the punchline. Overall rating: A disjointed, but entertaining movie. Misleading title though. There’s plenty of man, but not so much on gentle.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

andre27Apr 12, 2020

Um bom filme, que boas reviravoltas. Um bom elenco de actores e algumas cenas que marcam.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

miccaelFeb 24, 2020

I have no idea what is wrong with the critics, but this is not a "mixed" movie in terms of review score. It's quite good, not average. It has a lot of modern UK as well as oldschool references as Guy Ritchie once again shows that he can makeI have no idea what is wrong with the critics, but this is not a "mixed" movie in terms of review score. It's quite good, not average. It has a lot of modern UK as well as oldschool references as Guy Ritchie once again shows that he can make great gangster movie when his hands aren't tied.
Great cast! Maybe not all English international or US audiences understand British words in the movie but it is still enjoyable.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

DeanomiteJun 4, 2020

nice photography, snappy dialog. Hugh Grant nearly unrecognizable. fun and light pot mafia tale. I think of Guy Ritchie as what Nicolas Winding Refn would be if Madonna had him neutered.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

JLuis_001Feb 27, 2020

You will never receive a lesson nor will take something deep into your being after watching a Guy Ritchie movie but when the guy comes back to this style, things work pretty good for him. Can be a little repetitive but still solid andYou will never receive a lesson nor will take something deep into your being after watching a Guy Ritchie movie but when the guy comes back to this style, things work pretty good for him. Can be a little repetitive but still solid and honestly I needed a carefree film like this one, that demands nothing from you but to sit down and have fun.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

ahmedaiman1999May 26, 2020

Less than the sum of its parts; cool action scenes, decent performances, interesting characterisations and bits of witty dialogue here and there, but the structure is deeply flawed and messy, and the plot is too convoluted for its own good --Less than the sum of its parts; cool action scenes, decent performances, interesting characterisations and bits of witty dialogue here and there, but the structure is deeply flawed and messy, and the plot is too convoluted for its own good -- I guess Ritchie thought his film is way smarter than it really is.

What really bogged this movie down for me though is Ritchie's persistence to veer away from his early style which he presumably, to some degree, returned to here. I get that he wanted to return to form without making yet another version of Snatch and Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels (both of which I liked, especially the former), but I'm quite not sure whether most of the choices he made here in order to render the film a refreshing feel worked together. Regardless, The Gentlemen is a good fun with enough clever touches to satisfy Ritchie's fans.

(6.5/10)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Experiment626Dec 26, 2020

Wasn't sure what to expect from this one. But the ensemble cast is perfect for the movie. One of Ritchie's movies that I highly recommend.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

MahmusSep 25, 2020

Fast paced, convoluted in a good way (the Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch way) and with an excellent cast. This is Matthew McConaughey's best performance in quite a while.
Hugh Grant and Colin Farrell in particular steal theFast paced, convoluted in a good way (the Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch way) and with an excellent cast. This is Matthew McConaughey's best performance in quite a while.
Hugh Grant and Colin Farrell in particular steal the show.

It's Guy Ritchie going back to his roots and it's really fun to watch.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

JJPJan 30, 2020

I honestly don't know how this movie gets a yellow, maybe it was the cruder elements of the script. However, this was a SUPER enjoyable movie. Not boring whatsoever, and containing interesting plot twists. Don't let the middling criticI honestly don't know how this movie gets a yellow, maybe it was the cruder elements of the script. However, this was a SUPER enjoyable movie. Not boring whatsoever, and containing interesting plot twists. Don't let the middling critic reviews fool you, this is a really fun movie.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

7

BatMiteFeb 7, 2020

A fun return to the British gangster film by Guy Ritchie that is not unlike Snatch and Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels although never quite achieves the same light. The movie is well written and stylishly shot with a web-tangle storyA fun return to the British gangster film by Guy Ritchie that is not unlike Snatch and Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels although never quite achieves the same light. The movie is well written and stylishly shot with a web-tangle story that comedically unfolds through Hugh Grant's wonderful narration to Charlie Hunnam's mild amusement and annoyance. Matthew McConaughey stars as the king of the streets and delivers a great performance that demands the screen like no other as they twist and turn through the mystery of the story. The pace tends to slow a bit but is never boring due to the writing and sheer madness of the characters we meet throughout. Standouts like Grant and Colin Farrell elevate the material they are given and Hunnam's straight man performance is enough to have fun when he finally does get involved in the violent chaos of the movie.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

OlympianLadyJan 27, 2020

Now, this wasn't an artistically great movie, but I would consider it to be a rather enjoyable one. Matthew McConaughey was highly convincing in the part, with a brilliant supporting cast that is really able to sell their roles and theNow, this wasn't an artistically great movie, but I would consider it to be a rather enjoyable one. Matthew McConaughey was highly convincing in the part, with a brilliant supporting cast that is really able to sell their roles and the accompanying banter. I would say that it's definitely not for everyone - it is something of a gangster movie - but still amounts to something like a crime comedy, which Guy Ritchie is naturally good at. It isn't something that absolutely needs to be seen immediately in the theater, for sure, but it definitely is one to catch at some point for people into movies.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

akhilanMar 26, 2020

I think Ritchie is back in action with his favorite genre, anyway The Gentlemen was a refreshing joining from the man who made this level of subjects. He was in the slot of making fantasy and adventurous things for a couple of his works butI think Ritchie is back in action with his favorite genre, anyway The Gentlemen was a refreshing joining from the man who made this level of subjects. He was in the slot of making fantasy and adventurous things for a couple of his works but now I think the original Ritchie is back. Not up to the mark of Snatch and Lock, Stock... but this is also a quite interesting one. Narration is good and the cut back formula that he is always using in his movies. Nice on to watch for all Ritchie fans.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

eutohiusFeb 12, 2020

It is definitely not a masterpiece. Either is it not a movie that I will review in a year or two. Still, an enjoyable work, with a great cast, and solid writing as well. If you liked Ritchie's earlier movies (which unfortunately didn't ageIt is definitely not a masterpiece. Either is it not a movie that I will review in a year or two. Still, an enjoyable work, with a great cast, and solid writing as well. If you liked Ritchie's earlier movies (which unfortunately didn't age well), you'll probably like The Gentlemen.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

7

geewahDec 20, 2020

No mistaking this is the work of Guy Ritchie.
Entertaining without breaking any new ground.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

moviemitch96Jan 26, 2020

I'd only consider myself a casual Guy Ritchie fan, having enjoyed some of his previous British crime films, such as 'Snatch' and 'Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels' just fine. The cast and premise of this film were enough to intrigue me toI'd only consider myself a casual Guy Ritchie fan, having enjoyed some of his previous British crime films, such as 'Snatch' and 'Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels' just fine. The cast and premise of this film were enough to intrigue me to give this latest outing of his a go. Matthew McConaughey plays an American-born drug lord residing in England, who plans to retire and sell off his business. However, it doesn't go so simply, as he's marked for death by many hitmen and criminals who want in on his fortune and position of power, which in turn, involves various other criminals throughout England. The cast is easily the best thing about this film! McConaughey gives an always reliably charismatic lead performance, along with some rather humorous supporting turns from Charlie Hunnam, Colin Farrell, and Hugh Grant to name a few. The action and fights are quite fun to watch, and there are some funny moments to be had. However, story-wise, it came up a bit short for me. Things get a little overly convoluted and the movie dragged itself out a little longer than I would've liked. The film took its time with a couple plot points longer than necessary too in my eyes. Overall, it's a welcome return to form for Guy Ritchie, as he's mainly been focusing on big budget fare like 'King Arthur' and the live-action 'Aladdin' as of late, and there's some funny lines and moments throughout, but the story's a little too convoluted and dragged out for its own good that it didn't quite justify the handful of moments I did enjoy. I anticipate those who are bigger fans of Ritchie's British crime films will enjoy it a little more than I did.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

Danny7878Feb 17, 2020

It was rather slow. However it was intelligent, and the acting was excellent!!

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

marklaing1Dec 22, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Bizarre casting, (Hugh Grant as a gay paparazzi stringer when he is a superb upper middle class twit, why fight it?), Matthew McConaughey completely miscast, almost everyone in the wrong roles here. No chemistry or anything between the American gangster and his beloved moll wife. There were fun moments but how did the Black London boxing guys become expert with automatic weapons, especially when Colin Farrell just told us they're his pupils at a boxing gym? How did McConaughey survive a hhigh-speed crash with a lorry, with nary a scratch. Why didn't someone in makeup shave that nasty rash of a beard off his face? The opening credits were the best moment, it was trying to be Snatch but was typically Richie overdone.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

Iamcritical86Jul 21, 2020

Oh my GOD! Just one convoluted scene to another! It's like every segment of the film insisted upon itself. The story line was all over the place, making the film PAINFUL to follow and brutally confusing. I gave "The Gentlemen" a generous 5Oh my GOD! Just one convoluted scene to another! It's like every segment of the film insisted upon itself. The story line was all over the place, making the film PAINFUL to follow and brutally confusing. I gave "The Gentlemen" a generous 5 strictly under the premise that it "had it's moments". Every dramatic scene was like throwing glitter on something that could never be a star!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Mauro_LanariDec 3, 2020

(Mauro Lanari)
Ritchie is left with just a bit of style, while poetics, screenplay, dialogues and metacinema are now a copy of Quentin's ones. At least also his musical taste is still valid: "In Every Dream Home a Heartache", Roxy Music 1973.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

kamgeforceMar 29, 2020

For once I agree with the critics. Snatch and Lock, Stock(and the rest) were incredibly entertaining movies with both brutal action and hilarious comedy. The Gentlemen is pretentious, predictable, completely unoriginal but worst of allFor once I agree with the critics. Snatch and Lock, Stock(and the rest) were incredibly entertaining movies with both brutal action and hilarious comedy. The Gentlemen is pretentious, predictable, completely unoriginal but worst of all incredibly boring. Good cast, but the acting was adequate at best. Grant stood out simply because his character of a sleazy cuck was very believable, I wonder why. Farrell did decent job as well, his character was the only one bordering on interesting. No iconic characters that will be remembered years from now though. I am glad i didnt watch this in a theater because I would walk out, took me a day to finish this in between watching something more interesting and even still i think it was a waste of time.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

4

GinaKJan 28, 2020

An organized crime comedy with many well-known actors, some clever dialogue, and a few surprises, but with a plot that often limped along noticeably. Not a lot of wit and originality but satisfying enough for a January movie when the weatherAn organized crime comedy with many well-known actors, some clever dialogue, and a few surprises, but with a plot that often limped along noticeably. Not a lot of wit and originality but satisfying enough for a January movie when the weather is gloomy and the holidays are over. I don’t mean this as sarcastically as it sounds, but you can do a lot worse in January if you’ve seen all the films nominated for various awards.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

4

hnestlyontheslyMar 2, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Gentlemen is done dirty by a January opening. It's an April, at least. The movie is more of an experiment in ASMR sexual harassment on the part of some attractive no good doers from Ritchie's past projects. The story is a bit of a mousetrap of chronologies and unreliable narration, which makes it fun and tightly packed, well-paced, and oddly both more and less self-aware than some of his previous projects.

I have a soft and blind spot for Guy Ritchie films. I don't usually know I'm watching one unless Charlie Hunnam is in it. I've passively consumed a lot of Ritchie's big budget films in my childhood and early adolescence. I am continually surprised by the ways that his aesthetic both parodies and plays along with some themes of toxic masculinity: the gestures toward gay- and race-baiting for humor, the way that self-aware British culture clashes with American sensibilities about masculinity, and the unexpected joy of a bro-y film that doesn't need to feel like a game of Cards Against Humanity with your edgelord friends from college. The Gentlemen is a who's who of Ritchie's oeuvre of caper and gangster flicks along with actors on the rise like Henry Golding and Michelle Dockery (of Downton fame), and Matthew McConnaughey saucily eye-fing the camera the entire movie. Spoilers ahead. Ritchie makes moves toward metatheatrical storytelling in his editing, his occasional illustrated captioning, an inset narrative, and the not-so-subtle parables wrapped in trailer material. The opening shot of this movie, in which McConnaughey dies, is startling, and the rewind and reconstruction of events, which has the room for embellishment and authorial focalization, are elements of novel direction, but there are other things that are less innovative, notably the rape threat, which amounts to maybe the biggest missed opportunity for a rewind. One cannot help but think of moments like these as unforced errors. It's not our job to explain away the sloppiness of these choices for "time" or "movie length," because when you're movie has a full on music video of fight porn, you lose the excuse of having trimmed the plot to its barest bones. It can't be fun to be the critic finger wagging at the twee racist jokes of a much beloved genre director of dark comedies. I expect that everyone's sensitivities will be tested at some point or another in this movie, but I'm personally a lot less guilty about laughing at the casually racist jokes in this movie than I am about the constant undercurrent of faux homosexual tension that's pervasive in this movie. If this is a directorial decision that's supposed to satirize the BDE of the genre heroes, I am open in being persuaded to like it. In terms of fun ways that Ritchie defuses my anxieties about racist accents and the rest: the movement of our sympathies from the first time we meet The Toddlers and their original entry versus the final scenes or the Three Strikes joke (I'm reading this in my notes, I don't know what these means anymore) shows how Ritchie can play on our expectations of what a Bro-y movie with a lot of Anglo strongmen would think about a bunch of black and brown tykes with GoPros strapped to their heads. Even the way that Colin Ferrell educates the kids in the shop is an excellent twist to his own character, because it feels like he's toying with some inner city hooligans, in part, to deflate their egos, but we then learn that this is sort of his whole deal. The way Ferrell responds to his Toddlers when they ask, "Is everything OK, Coach?" with "No, it's not fine" and admonishment for their past actions does a lovely job of injecting their relationship with the pathos of a mentor. I guess there's some insidious racism implicit in the idea that the only thing standing between these boys and crime is a rough tongued Irishman, but honestly the conversation on race that the Coach and his student have does enough to show that the film is at least aware of criticism. Laugh out loud moments in this movie were reserved for the dragon fable and it’s rewind--Wife and Friend were both tickled by it and Wife went in unaware of the trailer, so I think it was doubly funny for her. The rewinds on Dry Eye's introduction are a way of being able to build character for the narrator and create a sense that our story is unreliable. The way that the inset narrative eventually leads to the present moment of storytelling is an excellent control of plot. The foiling of blackmail and new relationships that are blended together post the journalist's initial run through of the story makes for a powerful second act. I like the twisty chronology of the beginning moment of the McConnaughey's murder and the way that Hugh Grant's twist with the Russian oligarch changes the trajectory of the story. Might have to think on this one a little harder, but I definitely recommend.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

MaksymilianJul 9, 2020

This movie was bizarre. It didn't involve me at all and was a bit boring but have amazing actors.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

gracjanskiJan 3, 2022

I didnt laugh even once. The characters didnt interest me at all, I didnt care about the story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

iamdavyboiFeb 10, 2020

Boring! Kind of forgot where I was and what I was watching about 40 mins in. The movie attempts to come off like Oceans 11 or something of that nature but ends up seeming like a long-form Lincoln commercial.

2 of 13 users found this helpful211

All this user's reviews

2

GreatMartinJan 28, 2020

Within one movie I broke my 2 and only New Year's resolutions: 1) I will not go to a movie just for the sake of going to a movie especially if I know I won't like it and 2) I will walk out of a movie that I don't like! Yes, I like MathewWithin one movie I broke my 2 and only New Year's resolutions: 1) I will not go to a movie just for the sake of going to a movie especially if I know I won't like it and 2) I will walk out of a movie that I don't like! Yes, I like Mathew McConaughey, Hugh Grant, Charlie Hunnam, Colin Farrell, Jeremy Strong and since "Crazy Rich Asians" Henry Golding but nothing could save this movie.

At first, it was interesting seeing Grant playing against type but 15 minutes in his heavy put on English accent (Yes, I know he is English but never like this) so I was glad he was working with/against Charlie Hunnam but that wasn't enough.

I am not a fan of Guy Ritchie and believe I have seen only one of his movies but his having directed, produced and written the screenplay for this movie I have no desire to see them or anymore by him. This is an old type gangster movie with a few twists and turns, a lot of violence, racial comments against Asians, throw in some anti-Semitism along with homophobic darts not to forget the f, the many c words plus pig porn and blood and more blood and then some more blood!

The theatre was full and a few people laughed at some of the lines but I broke my 2 and only New Year's resolutions!… Expand

3 of 19 users found this helpful316

All this user's reviews

2

georgiadrewFeb 9, 2020

Some good acting but lots of unnecessary nasty language which the perverts in the audience liked. matthew mcconaughey gave a pathetic performance and should go back to making car commercials which is what he is best at doing.

3 of 17 users found this helpful314

All this user's reviews

2

MferrisJan 26, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I didn’t realize how sick I have become of Matthew McConaughey. The movie was boring. McConaughey’s character revealed a familiar smarter than anyone else in the room trait, that he tends to gravitate toward, in his roles. I have to admit, that I was disappointed, when the character he portrayed, wasn’t killed during the attempt on his life, at the start of the movie. Hugh Grant must be really struggling to have accepted that role in that movie, my has his career taken a nose drive. I would rate this only slightly better than “Beach Bum” another recent Movie he released.… Expand

4 of 21 users found this helpful417

All this user's reviews

1

neeeeeeiinFeb 26, 2021

Stupid W.A.S.P centric gangster schlock that you've seen a thousand times before from Guy Ritchie. Ofcourse it's the White, Anglo gangsters that are the more ethical, honourable and competent ones, that come out on top because of plot armourStupid W.A.S.P centric gangster schlock that you've seen a thousand times before from Guy Ritchie. Ofcourse it's the White, Anglo gangsters that are the more ethical, honourable and competent ones, that come out on top because of plot armour and other rubbish. The users reviews seem to be spamming people with downvotes who didn't like this film for being crass and bigoted towards anyone that wasn't white or Anglo in this film and I can kindly tell those users to go **** them selves ;) Critics should've actually been more harsh.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

1

jacks109Mar 5, 2020

Strange racist overtones that didn't serve any purpose. Black C@#$, Chinaman, Pound of Flesh, it was off putting.

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

1

Sed8edFeb 11, 2020

Horrible. I walked out. Hard to follow, dumb plot. Weak and annoying storyline.

3 of 23 users found this helpful320

All this user's reviews

1

nixster555Dec 24, 2020

Horrible ending. Every main character had immense amounts of plot armour. It was okay up till the ending then got increasingly worse.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

0

morovianMar 26, 2022

An extremely anemic attempt to bring back the success of Lock, Stock & Snatch. Anemic is actually an understatement. If you can make it through the first half hour without using your popcorn bag as a receptacle for the contents of yourAn extremely anemic attempt to bring back the success of Lock, Stock & Snatch. Anemic is actually an understatement. If you can make it through the first half hour without using your popcorn bag as a receptacle for the contents of your stomach, then you, like most of the viewing public at this point in the history of humanity, have lost all ability to discriminate...notice the difference between inspired creativity and a desperate formula. Matthew McConaughey is who he always is in every film, unwatchable. The script is supposed to be engrossing but it just doesn't deliver. It's like a train off the rails the entire time, plowing forward anyway, grating noise, going nowhere. The plot and dialogue are so utterly contrived and lame that I actually felt sorry for the actors, some of whom are quite talented, struggle to bring vitality to this total P.O.S. I can't even finish my review because it is making me ill to recall everything worth criticizing, suffice to say that this is more a public service announcement to not waste your time. It's really one of the worst films of this genre I have ever seen.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

mastertigraMay 4, 2020

Ещё во время просмотра данного фильма возникло ощущение, будто меня обманули. В некоторых сценах подкрадывался "испанский стыд". Ожидал увидеть очередной стильный и смешной криминал (как "Карты, деньги...") либо глубокий, эстетическиЕщё во время просмотра данного фильма возникло ощущение, будто меня обманули. В некоторых сценах подкрадывался "испанский стыд". Ожидал увидеть очередной стильный и смешной криминал (как "Карты, деньги...") либо глубокий, эстетически выверенный "Револьвер".

Честно, не знаю, как "Джентльмены" могли понравиться людям, которые были в восторге от просмотра "классики" Гая Ричи, приведённой выше.

Совершенно незамысловатый, обделённый хорошим юмором, а местами даже нудный (чего уж стоит бубнёжь Хью Гранта на протяжении всего фильма) фильм Гая Ричи, пропитанный нелепым пафосом и совершенно не вызывающий желания пересматривать его ещё раз.

Увы.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

The Gentlemen

User Reviews