The Fountain

9

roxwordroxwordJun 29, 2007

Sometimes I'm amazed by all the closed down minds on this planet. this film is a love song, a deep tone poem about mortality, heart, soul and science and their relationships to each other. perhaps that's too much for the averageSometimes I'm amazed by all the closed down minds on this planet. this film is a love song, a deep tone poem about mortality, heart, soul and science and their relationships to each other. perhaps that's too much for the average viewer to absorb, but this viewer could have watched another 2 or 3 more hours of this. I'll probably end up buying it and screening it over and over and then I'll wish I had given "the fountain" a ten. don't miss it.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful

0

AnnR.Jun 29, 2007

I'm usually intrigued by time travel movies, which is why I purchased this DVD, but The Fountain was simply awful. I think the producer was on drugs, it just didn't make any sense. Worse 20 bucks ever spent!

0 of 2 users found this helpful

0

MonicaSFJun 28, 2007

This was the worst film I've seen in long time. Can't believe two of my fav. actors (Jackman & Weisz) and the director of Pi & Requiem for a Dream (I absolutely loved both movies) could make such a BORING film! I hate MTV and fast This was the worst film I've seen in long time. Can't believe two of my fav. actors (Jackman & Weisz) and the director of Pi & Requiem for a Dream (I absolutely loved both movies) could make such a BORING film! I hate MTV and fast paced modern visuals, but this movie sucks big time!!!! The story set in the future is meant to be a space ship!? Give me a break! And I'm the sort of person that never leaves a movie theatre or stops reading a book half way through. I'm so upset for the time wasted on this.... grrr.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

2

WilliamB.Jun 27, 2007

It was a complete mess, not engaging at all, and there was no chemistry between Jackman and Weisz.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

7

MatthewF.Jun 17, 2007

While it seems like a rather illogical, incoherent, and too smart to grasp film, Darren Aronofsky

1 of 1 users found this helpful

6

HIramG.Jun 11, 2007

Director added too many things that takes you out of the main theme of the movie.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

2

AnonymousSeattleJun 3, 2007

Although visually stunning and stylistically beautiful, this was a terrible film. It was the kind of movie that "looks really good" and then has no plot, cheesy and insincere feeling characters, and goes absolutely nowhere. And I'm not Although visually stunning and stylistically beautiful, this was a terrible film. It was the kind of movie that "looks really good" and then has no plot, cheesy and insincere feeling characters, and goes absolutely nowhere. And I'm not one to usually need a lot of plot or action to be enthralled. This was deeply disappointing- it seemed more like an art project than a film.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

10

RyanJun 3, 2007

I think the director was trying to send a heartfelt message about love and life, and that those touched by it would enjoy this film, and that's why I give it a 10, it's a matter of opinion, you don't have to be so uptight mr. I think the director was trying to send a heartfelt message about love and life, and that those touched by it would enjoy this film, and that's why I give it a 10, it's a matter of opinion, you don't have to be so uptight mr. "Anonymous H".… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful

2

RyanMJun 2, 2007

Darren Aronofsky

1 of 5 users found this helpful

5

IanPMay 31, 2007

Unquestionably a bad film, despite its visual splendor. Not bad in a way you can sink your teeth into, bad for its incredibly vague, cloyingly sentimental, new agey, breathtakingly empty, pseudo-philosophical jibber jabber. Bad in a way that Unquestionably a bad film, despite its visual splendor. Not bad in a way you can sink your teeth into, bad for its incredibly vague, cloyingly sentimental, new agey, breathtakingly empty, pseudo-philosophical jibber jabber. Bad in a way that makes me suspect that the people who made it don't really know the difference between a powerful statement about life and death (however ambiguous: that is NOT the issue here) and a conglomeration of impressive images hung together on the feeblest and most pretentious of threads. Which would make this a horrof film, of sorts, but emblematic of an age that will doubtless be remembered above all for its sheer vacuity.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful

8

AnonymousHMay 29, 2007

Jimmy stop giving 10's to movies just because they are original. If you really like a movie give it a 9, especially if you admit there is argument for flaws. It's people like you that rate movies 10's or 0's that give Jimmy stop giving 10's to movies just because they are original. If you really like a movie give it a 9, especially if you admit there is argument for flaws. It's people like you that rate movies 10's or 0's that give objective criticism a bad name. The movie is good and original. Not perfect. Check it out.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful

10

JImmyHMay 27, 2007

Terrific film! It's magical, hypnotic, breathtaking. I was left confused yet intrigued and wanting to find out more and search. It's hard for me to understand why so many critics are panning this movie. I mean, with movies like Terrific film! It's magical, hypnotic, breathtaking. I was left confused yet intrigued and wanting to find out more and search. It's hard for me to understand why so many critics are panning this movie. I mean, with movies like "Spiderman 3" scoring better on Metacritic than "The Fountain" I am left scratching my head. Do the critics hold Arnofsky to a different standard? My opinion is that with all of the trash that is heaped into theaters these days, we should appreciate when a movie like this comes along. Some may find it flawed, I don't doubt. But should we not give credit where it's due? Anyway, I thought it was a true work of art and will watch it repeatedly.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful

8

JoeAverageMay 26, 2007

It's too bad Aronofsky deals in pretty images (thematic and visual), rather than develop his arguments (yes Darren, I have questions on Immortality, Life and True Love as well, but what's your take?) At least in Pi, he attempted to It's too bad Aronofsky deals in pretty images (thematic and visual), rather than develop his arguments (yes Darren, I have questions on Immortality, Life and True Love as well, but what's your take?) At least in Pi, he attempted to tackle his subject matter straight on. It's all a lovely trip to soak in though. Although, all the lotus position stuff does look rather stupid and out-of-place.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

AndersL.May 21, 2007

A minor masterpiece. Bears repeated viewings. The soundtrack is also gorgeous.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

8

JohnB.May 18, 2007

Movies this deep don't deserve to be seen by people who don't wish to better understand it and what it stands for. This movie is really something to wrap your head around and it even leaves enough room for imagination left for the Movies this deep don't deserve to be seen by people who don't wish to better understand it and what it stands for. This movie is really something to wrap your head around and it even leaves enough room for imagination left for the viewer. The visuals in the Fountain are an absolutely stunning work of art. Now I could easily call this movie pretentious yet at the same time without that pretense, there wouldn't be much to see here. My only complaints of the Fountain were the excessive amounts of scene changes which I felt were not properly executed, and the poor script that neither worked for the characters or for the audience. Those mistakes alone take this down a notch from being truly exceptional but a movie of this magnitude deserves to be seen provided you are willing to go into it with an open mind.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

SeanD.May 18, 2007

Every time I watch an Aranofsky movie, it is a life-changing experience. There's something about his style of writing and filming that is extremely memorable. Even with it's focus on death, I left this movie extremely uplifted. I Every time I watch an Aranofsky movie, it is a life-changing experience. There's something about his style of writing and filming that is extremely memorable. Even with it's focus on death, I left this movie extremely uplifted. I can't get it's visuals out of my mind & can't wait to watch it again. Not many movies these days challenge thought and ideas. I can't believe the critics pounded this one. A memorable, beautiful movie, but I guess it's not for everyone.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

EricC.May 16, 2007

The bad reviews are suprising, since critics were suckers for Aranofsky's first two films, also complex and surreal. Shockingly beautiful, and yeah, occasionally confusing as all hell, but doesn't deserve the brutal reviews. How The bad reviews are suprising, since critics were suckers for Aranofsky's first two films, also complex and surreal. Shockingly beautiful, and yeah, occasionally confusing as all hell, but doesn't deserve the brutal reviews. How can you praise someone for doing something twice before, and then try to punish him when he does it again with even more grace and skill? Mark F is right. It doesn't topple 2001 as the deffinitive mind-bending sci-fi epic. But if you give it a chance, it'll come pretty close. Just don't overthink it.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

5

MarkF.May 15, 2007

First off, my rating is VERY generous. Even if Aranofsky is considered a visionary, this is one of the darkest, most downbeat, isimplistic, yet incoherent messes of a "film" I've seen recently. I've heard from several college age First off, my rating is VERY generous. Even if Aranofsky is considered a visionary, this is one of the darkest, most downbeat, isimplistic, yet incoherent messes of a "film" I've seen recently. I've heard from several college age students that this is this generation's "2001". Well, if this is true, that's even more pathetic than this film is. I will admit that I only give Aronofsky's previous films a 6, so maybe you can go ahead and make fun of me now, but I've never clipped for any money or pretended that I had anything to share with you except for common sense.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

RobertTheBruceMay 14, 2007

It never ceases to amaze me how hypocritical movie going audiences can be. For years we hear people complaining about how movies are too formulaic, predictable and narrative like. But when a movie, that truly reaches beyond the conventions It never ceases to amaze me how hypocritical movie going audiences can be. For years we hear people complaining about how movies are too formulaic, predictable and narrative like. But when a movie, that truly reaches beyond the conventions of the typical Hollywood blockbuster finally comes forward, it is shunned, as people flee back to their tried and true formulas and trilogies. This it seems is the story of the Fountain. The film is truly a work of art, combining some of the most beautiful cinematography and music yet seen in a movie theater with an idea that is so simple, so common place, but at the same time so utterly life changing. Like the theater of Brecht, the Fountain is not so much about the narrative, but how what we are seeing communicates to us. It is for this reason that i feel the movie has had such a bad showing. The ideas its presents are so raw, so completely human, that it is hard to see them presented to us in this fashion. The ideas, for for average movie going joe, are to big and at the same time, close to heart to contemplate in a movie theater. For this reason, the Fountain should ONLY be seen by those who are able to watch a film without everything being spelled out for them, and by those intelligent enough to analyse the films message and how it is conveyed. Is truly one of the most original, innovative and moving films for a long time. 10/10… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

MixsyG.Apr 8, 2007

I loved to watch The Fountain. Finally someone expresing openly in a movie those allways Human-Spiritual issues that we are IN and we will, liking it or not. I enjoyed it cause also is reach in simbolism and it gives the unique I loved to watch The Fountain. Finally someone expresing openly in a movie those allways Human-Spiritual issues that we are IN and we will, liking it or not. I enjoyed it cause also is reach in simbolism and it gives the unique interpretation for each detail. And as other comment i read here i think "It takes a special kind of person to enjoy this very special movie"… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful

10

JamesT.Apr 3, 2007

Darren Aronofsky film captures many facets of human emotion and coming to terms with death and all that may mean to us.all of this is not easy too think about let alone portray but just for sheer thought provoking beautyfull cinematography Darren Aronofsky film captures many facets of human emotion and coming to terms with death and all that may mean to us.all of this is not easy too think about let alone portray but just for sheer thought provoking beautyfull cinematography and music it wins hands down.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful

8

HenrikO.Mar 29, 2007

Criticism was also hard on Kubrick's "2001" in its day. I wonder whether there is some connection to this, another wildly philosphical piece of film art, and its criticism - similar to "2001"'s - and again, not supprisingly enough, Criticism was also hard on Kubrick's "2001" in its day. I wonder whether there is some connection to this, another wildly philosphical piece of film art, and its criticism - similar to "2001"'s - and again, not supprisingly enough, by old farts.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

RonS.Mar 2, 2007

It takes a special kind of person to enjoy this very special movie, I can understand pepole who didnt connect to it's stand on love and death, and I can see why pepole are saying Aronofsky over-reached, but it is so beautiful and It takes a special kind of person to enjoy this very special movie, I can understand pepole who didnt connect to it's stand on love and death, and I can see why pepole are saying Aronofsky over-reached, but it is so beautiful and touching, the actors fill you up with a warming sensation, flawless work of cinematic art, a true masterpiece.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful

10

MariR.Feb 19, 2007

A movie ahead its time! Future will show!

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

JoeC.Feb 18, 2007

I loved this film. As I walked out of the theatre, all I could think about was seeing it again. Does that make it good? Not necessarily. But it changed the way I view cinema. And that is just fine with me.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

0

DianeR.Feb 13, 2007

This film poses as a education on alternative faith while borrowing fact from the Original. The Tree of Life is Biblical, but here it seems like it's alternative medicine. In dealing with the fact people physically die and our This film poses as a education on alternative faith while borrowing fact from the Original. The Tree of Life is Biblical, but here it seems like it's alternative medicine. In dealing with the fact people physically die and our powerlessness to stop it will not be solved by diverting our attention to think powerful thoughts. The connection between the couple seemed beautiful, but time wasted on trying to be her savior instead of savouring their last momments was irritating and egocentric. In the end, it seemed like mind-trip escapism was the only thing left to do to cope with the loss. How sad.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful

4

TJW.Feb 12, 2007

Ah, Mr. Aronofsky...where did you go wrong? The director of two of the best films of the last ten years, Pi: Faith In Chaos and Requiem For A Dream, released his latest, the $80 million dollar sci-fi epic The Fountain this week, and while it Ah, Mr. Aronofsky...where did you go wrong? The director of two of the best films of the last ten years, Pi: Faith In Chaos and Requiem For A Dream, released his latest, the $80 million dollar sci-fi epic The Fountain this week, and while it starts off pretty well, it finishes up by proposing 500 different questions and not answering ANY of them. The movie tells three different stories; of Tomas, a 16th century conquistador searching for the tree of life; Tom Creo, a man desperately searching for a cure to his wife's brain tumor before she dies; and Tommy, a 26th century astronaut who is trying to do...something. The movie starts off pretty well, as it focuses mainly on the story of Tom. As he spends all his time searching for a cure, trying to extend his wife's life, he doesn't realize that he is wasting all the time that he does have with her, and is going to regret it in the end. I really liked this story (it was one of the few things I did like in this movie) and I think, had he not tried to do so much and instead JUST focused on this story, he could have had a great modern romance story on his hands. Unfortunately, he decides to stick two other stories in; this is where the movie completely fails. No one I know who's seen this really understood the point of either of these stories, and, sadly, there are going to be plenty of people who saw this movie who claim that you aren't supposed to understand everything, that's how it's supposed to be; don't believe them. This is just a copout because no one wants to admit that this great director has made a bad film. The acting here is pretty good. Rachel Weisz, who won an Oscar last year for The Constant Gardener, is great as Tom's wife, who is eternally optimistic about her death, although she cannot convince her husband of the same. Ellen Burstyn is also good as the fellow doctor of Tom, trying to convince him that he needs to embrace the time his wife does have instead of trying to create more. Hugh Jackman, however, is a different story; as Tom, the obsessed doctor trying to save his wife, he is pretty good, but when he switches to Tomas or Tommy, he makes some facial expressions that, although they are meant to be deep and moving, end up being almost laughable. The script is a completely muddled mess; Aronofsky tries to toss in deep theological question after deep theological question, but the script just ends up just coming off incredibly pretentious with lots of complex babble. One thing, however, almost completely redeems this film; the cinematography. Included are lots of Aronofsky's trademark EXTREME close-ups, which gives a lot of the scenes more life. You also see some amazing shots where the camera starts upside down, seemingly under the ground, and as a vehicle speeds over it, it completely flips to a normal shot; VERY cool. And the 26th century story, while it never makes sense, and is never explained what is going on, is absolutely beautiful; you'll stare at awe at some of the effects here. In the end, however, The Fountain is a complete disaster; had Aronofsky not attempt to tell the most epic story ever, he may have had a good film on his hands. As it stands, however, it is nothing more than a good-looking film with a completely ridiculous story.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

AlexA.Feb 11, 2007

Who are the retarded dweebs who are impressed by this picture? Rarely have I seen such a laughable, adolescent, poorly wrtten, style over substance ego-trip. EXCRUCIATING.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

8

JeremyWillmottFeb 11, 2007

This movie is gloriously pretentious and unapologetically incomprehensible, being mired in philosophy and religion. Most of the movie goers left scratching their head or laughing. For me though this movie was a lot more than that. It is This movie is gloriously pretentious and unapologetically incomprehensible, being mired in philosophy and religion. Most of the movie goers left scratching their head or laughing. For me though this movie was a lot more than that. It is flawed for sure. But the essence of the message is something that resounds deeply within me. Gorgeous art direction and underpinned by a sumptuos score by Clint Mansell, this film is a must for film fanatics. It feels much like the personal movies of the 60's. It explores themes of love, death and immortality whilst touching on old testament stories such as the Tree of Life from the garden of eden (the other tree was the tree of knowledge that Adam and Eve ate from). If The Fountain doesn't leave you chattering about the meaning of life you probably shouldn't have gone to see this movie in the first place. It is cerebral. It is challenging. But ultimately very rewarding. Did I mention it was beautiful to look at. Check out my full Aronofsky review over at tweenbetween.blogspot.com… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

MansurS.Feb 6, 2007

It's a difficult movie at times, but with focus and understanding something beautiful emerges from the film.

3 of 3 users found this helpful

10

ZephyrJ.Jan 26, 2007

The Fountain is not meant for casual viewing. It takes a stream-of-consciousness approach, and it was not until my third viewing that I was able to completely figure it out. I can not speak for anyone else, but I am sure of my own opinion, The Fountain is not meant for casual viewing. It takes a stream-of-consciousness approach, and it was not until my third viewing that I was able to completely figure it out. I can not speak for anyone else, but I am sure of my own opinion, and this is one of the finest movies I have ever seen.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

DavidD.Jan 13, 2007

Alas, the majority of critics are too Hollywood oriented to know genius when it stares them in the face. Mindblowing and beautiful, this movie will make you think too.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

3

leirisJan 6, 2007

You have got to be kidding me. Aronofsky seems to be trying to prove something with this one, but it falls flat on its face. But you've got to give him credit for trying something different...at least he is not just pumping out some You have got to be kidding me. Aronofsky seems to be trying to prove something with this one, but it falls flat on its face. But you've got to give him credit for trying something different...at least he is not just pumping out some generic tripe like most young directors.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

JacobC.Jan 3, 2007

I can understand the hesitance from some people about liking this film or not. Certainly it is not for the casual film goer. Darren Aronofsky's The Fountain requires the viewer to place themselves outside of the norm and rethink the way I can understand the hesitance from some people about liking this film or not. Certainly it is not for the casual film goer. Darren Aronofsky's The Fountain requires the viewer to place themselves outside of the norm and rethink the way films are made and viewed. It may seem a difficult task for some, but with the best acting Hugh Jackman has ever shown, flawless editing and a beautiful script, the pay-off is well worth the extra effort. With his ever-changing style and artistic vision, Aronofsky has proven his role as a staple in film history.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

ChadL.Jan 3, 2007

While I can certainly say that for me, this is one of the best films I've seen this year, movies of this profundity and caliber really deserve consideration at the level of what movies I have *ever* seen that have been this good. While While I can certainly say that for me, this is one of the best films I've seen this year, movies of this profundity and caliber really deserve consideration at the level of what movies I have *ever* seen that have been this good. While I have certainly spent a good deal of time deconstructing the film (themes, symbols, etc) I think thie real impact of The Fountain is as an experience, approached with the heart rather than the mind. But I don't mean to belittle the careful way in which Aranofsky has put this film together- its magnificence is abundant in all aspects of this film. Like other reviewers, I find it pretty shocking that so many people are panning this movie. I've read a number of reviews where it is obvious that the reviewer missed the whole point of the movie (not that it is all that complex), or took a too literal approach to the 3-part story line; I even felt that some wanted to trash the film in an attempt to be hip, by ragging on a hip new director coming into his own (transcendental meta-hipness?). And that's too bad, as they really missed taking in a marvelous movie.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful

10

AustinD.Dec 29, 2006

This is best film ever I seen. I can't hold my tears.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

GrahamB.Dec 26, 2006

This is one of the best films I've seen in a LONG time.

2 of 2 users found this helpful

3

RobertDec 24, 2006

A pretentious mess of a movie. Every line is either whispered or screamed to add nonexistent weight to an already sloppy script. Basic narrative techniques are eschewed for the sake or "artiness," but without them, the film becomes a A pretentious mess of a movie. Every line is either whispered or screamed to add nonexistent weight to an already sloppy script. Basic narrative techniques are eschewed for the sake or "artiness," but without them, the film becomes a mishmash of unclear scenarios and one dimensional characters Although some scenes were visually impressive, the flatness of the characters and the one note performances of the leads left me cold. .Jackman cries or acts bitter for the entire film, and Weisz basically stands around and smiles. How can I care about the characters when they have zero personality and development? Basically, I thought this movie had a rather simple idea (death is only the beginning, the circle of life, etc.) that reeked with self-importance, making the concept seem more insightful than it actually was. None of the questions Aronofsky poses are answered, which, instead of leaving room for the viewer to interpret things, is simply sloppy film making. The viewer shouldn't be spoon fed all the answers for a film, but the director, when dealing with weighty concepts like life and death, should provide more than just a cache of flashy images with little to no context. Giving the audience no explanation of the who, what, where, when, and why of a scene and forcing them to sort out the details is plain irresponsible. This is a movie designed for the self-congratulatory art house crowd. Those who like it feel "smart" and those who don't are made to feel "stupid" or inferior in some sort of way. I've never seen a film so convinced of its own importance. Instead of fretting over striking angles and nifty camera tricks, Aronofsky should have actually directed his actors or added some coherence to his screenplay. This was an overly ambitious movie that was hurt by its own ambition.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

10

SteLDec 17, 2006

Wonderful and very moving. Easily the best movie I've seen this year. Don't go into this movie not expecting to think (as some of these critics obviously did).

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

DavidH.Dec 11, 2006

I honestly can't figure out why this one is getting such a panning from the critics. I think many of them are defensively rating this low as to not be accused of being pretentious. The film is fantastic though, and not nearly as I honestly can't figure out why this one is getting such a panning from the critics. I think many of them are defensively rating this low as to not be accused of being pretentious. The film is fantastic though, and not nearly as confusing as people are making it out to be. I went in with my attention cranked up to ten, expecting something along the lines of 2001: SO, but honestly this movie is actually slightly guilty of spoon-feeding the viewers it's symbolism, and shouldn't be confusing to anyone with the least bit of an attention span. The ending could have been edited slightly tighter, though, maybe ending five minutes earlier or so.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

3

MikeDec 10, 2006

I loved the music from this movie! Great job. The acting by Hugh Jackman is amazing! What an amazing actor! this guy gets better and better the more movies he play in! But here's the bad part, the Director failed at putting it all I loved the music from this movie! Great job. The acting by Hugh Jackman is amazing! What an amazing actor! this guy gets better and better the more movies he play in! But here's the bad part, the Director failed at putting it all together. Kind of like Lynch had so many failures till Mulholland Drive. I think it is the same with this movie. The director, just didnt deliver what he wanted, I was waiting for the movie to get more deep, but it didn't happen.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

10

ChadS.Dec 8, 2006

"The Fountain" is, hands down, the best science-fiction film since David Cronenberg's "Existenz". The ascencion of that crystal ball, and the world inside it, is truly astonishing. The special effects in "The Fountain" has a quality "The Fountain" is, hands down, the best science-fiction film since David Cronenberg's "Existenz". The ascencion of that crystal ball, and the world inside it, is truly astonishing. The special effects in "The Fountain" has a quality that differs from most films. They're emotional. They're also used as metaphor. "The Fountain" is not completely unlike "Fantastic Voyage". Tommy's journey that seemingly is going beyond earth's sphere, in actuality, is a journey of an internal sort. It's a trek through his inner space(I think). "The Fountain" is not for everybody. A facetious description of this visionary film is that it's "Solaris" on crack. But if you're into eastern religions, have the dexterity to process three narrative threads, and might possibly be a little in love with Rachel Weisz(this time, when I close my eyes, I don't hear Kate Winslet), "The Fountain" might be the best film you see this year.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

LPC.Dec 8, 2006

One of the most stirring pieces of drama I've seen in years, on screen, on stage, or on tv. Jeweled elegance. I can't get over the passion with which some people disliked it. Did we see the same film? No matter. I consider it an One of the most stirring pieces of drama I've seen in years, on screen, on stage, or on tv. Jeweled elegance. I can't get over the passion with which some people disliked it. Did we see the same film? No matter. I consider it an early holiday gift.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

NicholasB.Dec 8, 2006

By far my favourite movie of the year. No matter who I see this movie with, everyone has a different interpretation of what is happening in the film. Whether its all, half, or no truth, it doesn't matter. Not only is the movie visually By far my favourite movie of the year. No matter who I see this movie with, everyone has a different interpretation of what is happening in the film. Whether its all, half, or no truth, it doesn't matter. Not only is the movie visually stunning, it really is a romance movie hidden in a sci-fi epic. Just beautiful.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

4

SpongeeeDec 8, 2006

Requiem was a classic, The Fountain is not. Bad story, script, sets, drama, music, camera work, even acting. Besides the cool galaxy/star images toward the end, the movie was an overall bore. Maybe Aranofsky took all the praise from Requiem Requiem was a classic, The Fountain is not. Bad story, script, sets, drama, music, camera work, even acting. Besides the cool galaxy/star images toward the end, the movie was an overall bore. Maybe Aranofsky took all the praise from Requiem to the head because he seemed to make this movie with no regard except for the fact that he thinks anything he does has to be good. Half the crew/and 1 actor were hold overs from Requiem...and Huge JACKman...I knew it was too good to be true when I saw the poster, but at least I gave it a shot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

MikeC.Dec 8, 2006

A turgid, pretentious, pseudo philosophic mess. Nothing here is credible, nor moving or interesting. Dialogues are often ridiculously laughable. Simply because they won't be able to understand the movie, or because they will be A turgid, pretentious, pseudo philosophic mess. Nothing here is credible, nor moving or interesting. Dialogues are often ridiculously laughable. Simply because they won't be able to understand the movie, or because they will be fascinated by the "visuals", some "intellectuals" will say it's brilliant or fantastic. It's completely shallow and poorly written. The "oeuvre d'art" of a fart.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful

9

MeredithL.Dec 7, 2006

I thought that this movie speaks to Aronofsky's daring filming techniques. I think that he really sets the bar for other directors to live up to.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

7

DW.Dec 7, 2006

You have to give this film high marks for aspiration, even if it fails to be truly engaging. At least Aronofsky isn't parlaying his success into making competent sequels of comic book movies, and is trying to move us forward. Beautiful, You have to give this film high marks for aspiration, even if it fails to be truly engaging. At least Aronofsky isn't parlaying his success into making competent sequels of comic book movies, and is trying to move us forward. Beautiful, elemental, just maybe too many closeups of earnestness rather than people nakedly engaged in the struggle. Next time, Darren. I'll be there.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

TiC.Dec 5, 2006

One of the most beautiful films I have ever seen.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

4

WesJ.Dec 5, 2006

Visually appealing but the muddled plot kept me from enjoying it. Perhaps if I had seen it in a better theater I would have enjoyed it more.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

JessicaG.Dec 4, 2006

2 of 3 users found this helpful

10

MichaelE.Dec 3, 2006

This film doesn't place the answers right in front of you, but it is a mystery easily solved by audience that cares about the characters. This isn't hard to do, as it has great acting, wonderful visuals, and excellent pacing.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

BettyE.Dec 3, 2006

A masterpiece. Ambitious, thought-provoking, and meaningful, it drives you to question your own justifications for existence. With phenomenal direction by Aronofsky, fantastic and realistic performances all-around, and a heartfelt story, The A masterpiece. Ambitious, thought-provoking, and meaningful, it drives you to question your own justifications for existence. With phenomenal direction by Aronofsky, fantastic and realistic performances all-around, and a heartfelt story, The Fountain is a film that demands repeat viewings to truly absorb the director's vision. See it with an open mind and savor its sublimity.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

JayDDec 3, 2006

A prime example of a movie that critics just don't get. It calls into question the intelligence of the people writing about it, particularly those who say Aranofsky's 'reach exceeds his grasp.' This is a complicated and A prime example of a movie that critics just don't get. It calls into question the intelligence of the people writing about it, particularly those who say Aranofsky's 'reach exceeds his grasp.' This is a complicated and assured film, one without easy answers. Everyone said these same types of criticisms about Kubrick films. The critical lambasting here just goes to show how little we expect from our films, how shocked we are when we're challenged by them, and how negatively we react when we can't understand them. Don't listen to the media static - see this movie.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful

10

JamieK.Dec 2, 2006

I'm first of all so glad that I just went to see this movie instead of trusting the low score on Metacritic and the bad reviews. I don't think that I will ever trust any reviewers ever again for that matter. This is a beautiful I'm first of all so glad that I just went to see this movie instead of trusting the low score on Metacritic and the bad reviews. I don't think that I will ever trust any reviewers ever again for that matter. This is a beautiful movie and made me feel something deep while waching it. The relationship of the two main characters was very genuine and I was glad to see that for a change. This movie is very artistic and emotional without being pretentious, and I felt very satisfied after seing it. Do see this movie; Aronofsky deserves the support for all the work he put into this one.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

ArtiP.Dec 2, 2006

Rarely does a film come by that is a true work of art. That is because of the multi-dimensionality of the system. In my observation, art is best exhibited in a uni-dimensional medium, because it lets the observer imagine the other Rarely does a film come by that is a true work of art. That is because of the multi-dimensionality of the system. In my observation, art is best exhibited in a uni-dimensional medium, because it lets the observer imagine the other dimensions. Like admiring a beautiful painting (visual), or listening to Beethoven(sound), or reading great literature - these art-forms offer great depth in one of the dimensions and let you imagine the rest. When a director is creating a movie, especially a feature film the coming together of the various mediums imposes the need to create a solid structure. In the process he tends to lose the raw emotions that art inspires. "The Fountain" is a great exceptation - as Darren Aronofsky has somehow magically retained the art in the movie. It does different things for different people, evokes different emotions, and does not end with your exit from the movie hall. My heart loved the movie (i watched it 4 days ago), and my mind is still processing it. Kudos to the Jackman, Aronofsky and Clint Mansell for bringing this masterpiece to life.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

6

BarryR.Dec 2, 2006

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

ozp.Dec 2, 2006

If you like simple, plain stories that dont represent a chellenge for your mind then dont look at this movie.

3 of 3 users found this helpful

9

jamesm.Nov 30, 2006

It was a bit confusing at the beginning, but everything fell into place eventually. in my opinion is not about a man in 3 seperate lives, as most people say. but instead 1 man's life from 3 different perspectives. very interesting. a must see

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

WillR.Nov 30, 2006

A gorgeous movie; atypical Hollywood narrative. Has to be viewed more as a parable or a visual poem, though the acting is phenomenal (Jackman should win best actor for this). Alludes to Solaris, 2001, Herzog, Buddhist philosophy, various A gorgeous movie; atypical Hollywood narrative. Has to be viewed more as a parable or a visual poem, though the acting is phenomenal (Jackman should win best actor for this). Alludes to Solaris, 2001, Herzog, Buddhist philosophy, various other religious icons and themes. Not an easy movie, but deserves much more praise than it has gotten.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful

4

MikeKNov 30, 2006

While the imagery is admittedly impressive at times, it simply cannot carry the weight of an overly ambitious, DRAGGING plotline. The movie transitions are abrupt, and the slow points truly crawl...to the point where you want to roll your While the imagery is admittedly impressive at times, it simply cannot carry the weight of an overly ambitious, DRAGGING plotline. The movie transitions are abrupt, and the slow points truly crawl...to the point where you want to roll your eyes. Jackman does a great job, although for me Weisz was over dramatic and fake.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

1

BenJ.Nov 29, 2006

This movie is terrible. There is three stories, but only one makes sense, and all are very depressing. The only redeemable quality is Hugh Jackman, but even he can't save a movie this bad.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

8

AlexNov 29, 2006

The Fountain, for some, is a movie that has to be seen a couple times before its finally understood. for others, its a visual masterpiece that actually lets you think freely about what it was really all about. it probably would have done a The Fountain, for some, is a movie that has to be seen a couple times before its finally understood. for others, its a visual masterpiece that actually lets you think freely about what it was really all about. it probably would have done a little better on the independent film circuit, since there are some concepts in the movie that the mainstream probably won't be able to grasp, and some will probably pass it off as a "thin plot". in order to truly enjoy the movie, you have to think deep, and keep an open mind. some of the acting was a little over done in certain places, but the overall feel of the movie grabs hold, and stays until long after the movie is over. 8 out of 10.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

MiguelC.Nov 28, 2006

Thought provoking and extremely original. Love it or hate it. I loved it!

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

AlanR.Nov 28, 2006

This movie was fantastic. I was happy that for once a company didn't spoon feed me the same crap that they've tried to give us for years. I've always respected Aronofsky because he never holds your hand through a film he lets This movie was fantastic. I was happy that for once a company didn't spoon feed me the same crap that they've tried to give us for years. I've always respected Aronofsky because he never holds your hand through a film he lets you draw your own conclusion. If someone is confused by details of this movie it's only because for the first time in years a character in a movie didn't tell us what's going on. I'm sick of this happening in films, it's like the movie industry believes the audience doesn't have enough intelligence to draw their own conclusions. It's a beautiful film, and it's definitely worth seeing. I will and have recommended it to everyone. I think it's the best movie that I've seen come out this year.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

ZachRNov 27, 2006

Anyone who thinks this is some watered down love story involving two people who live for thousands of years is missing alot. Alot of the reviews I have read seem to miss the central theme of this movie which is esentially coming to terms Anyone who thinks this is some watered down love story involving two people who live for thousands of years is missing alot. Alot of the reviews I have read seem to miss the central theme of this movie which is esentially coming to terms with things you cannot control and letting go of that which you cannot. Rather than being like the usual Hollywood drivel that trys to spoon feed themes to you, The Fountain lets you try to interpret the beautiful imagery for yourself. The three plotlines are arbitrary, not directly connected as too many people seem to think, and serve to tie the themes together. All of this is complimented by incredible special effects and a haunting score (Aronofsky brings back Clint Mansell and the Kronos Quartet along with Post-Rockers Mogwai) which leave this movie etched in your mind long after you've left the theatre. This movie reminds me of Tarkovsky's "Solyaris" on many levels and I'm interested to see how that would be reviewed if it were released today (oh wait, it was remade with George Clooney and was met with mixed reviews similar to this movie, though the original is far superior). Do not let the jaded, short-sighted, Zombified critics dissuade you from viewing this movie, it is brilliant.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JesseR.Nov 27, 2006

An awesome trip into the duality and enigma that is life/death.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

3

PunkR.Nov 27, 2006

I went for the visuals and I was not impressed. The story line is thin and the dialog sappy. Everyone here giving the film a 10 must have seen a different movie or they are PR plants. Honestly not worth seeing.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

10

CamiloCNov 27, 2006

I believe this film will be considered in terms of, for example, the Sistine Chapel or Handel's Messiah as one of the great achievements of human creativity. Magnificent.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

jNov 26, 2006

Rather than focus on the movie's faults and inability to quite match its ambitions, critics should instead see how this movie's reach and invention distance itself from the banal indie-fare oft-praised and quickly-forgotten.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JonH.Nov 26, 2006

One of the most lyrical, poetic movies I've seen in years. It left me drained and full and I loved every beautiful minute. I'll go see it again. Its terribly romantic, and I mean that in a more classical sense, and brimming with One of the most lyrical, poetic movies I've seen in years. It left me drained and full and I loved every beautiful minute. I'll go see it again. Its terribly romantic, and I mean that in a more classical sense, and brimming with heart. The movie really isn't that hard to follow, you just have to have some patience and let it unfold before you. I was fearful it might be pretentious, but it's not by a long shot. The true nature of the different eras (other than the present day) were a surprise to me and made so much sense. A wonderfully imaginative, heartfelt film that should be treasured, but that will probably only become well loved by a select group. Maybe that's as it should be.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JeffCNov 26, 2006

One of the most beautiful movies I've seen in a while. Even if someone has trouble following the narrative, I can't see how you could fault the score, art design, or cinematography of the film. That alone is worth seeing. This One of the most beautiful movies I've seen in a while. Even if someone has trouble following the narrative, I can't see how you could fault the score, art design, or cinematography of the film. That alone is worth seeing. This movie met my expectations on every level, and is highly recommended to anyone looking for a challenging film that raises questions about large themes in life. Its a unique movie experience.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

JakeR.Nov 26, 2006

It's not perfect. But what movie is? The Fountain is beautifully shot, well-acted, compelling entertainment. It's only hard to follow if you're used to having your stories spoon-fed to you, as some critics seem to be. I It's not perfect. But what movie is? The Fountain is beautifully shot, well-acted, compelling entertainment. It's only hard to follow if you're used to having your stories spoon-fed to you, as some critics seem to be. I can't recommend The Fountain universally, but a good metric is this: if you enjoyed Solaris, you'll like this one. If you thought Solaris was "pretentious" or "silly" for daring to put a little romance in their sci-fi (or vice-versa), then turn Deal or No Deal back on and skip this one.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

6

TyeN.Nov 26, 2006

Okay....I'm giving this film a six out of ten. Here's why: It drove me mad! It's the first film I've ever seen where nearly everyone in the theater booed when the credits started rolling. I heard someone shout, "I want my Okay....I'm giving this film a six out of ten. Here's why: It drove me mad! It's the first film I've ever seen where nearly everyone in the theater booed when the credits started rolling. I heard someone shout, "I want my money back!", and others yelling about how "This movie is horrible!" Here are my problems with it. First of all, the cinematography is moody, and I get that, but it's almost too dark that it becomes depresssing. The movie makes you work harder than any other film only to reach your own conclusion without any real sense of closure on it's own merits. This is maddening. But the most maddening aspect? The overall theme. What is it? Is it a morality tale about whether you should live forever if given the opportunity? Is it about love and it's endless bounds between two soul mates? Is it about the cycle of life and death? All of these themes pop up, but none are clearly designated to the plot. Speaking of which, here it is (without any real spoilers): Tommy Creo (Hugh Jackman) is a scientist who is working on a cure for a cancerous tumor that is killing his wife Izzi (Rachel Weisz). This is the central plotline. The second is the story of a conquistador named Tomas (again, Hugh Jackman) searching for the tree of life to save Spain and his queen Isabel (Rachel Weisz again). This story is actually a book that current day Izzi is writing, but can't seem to find an ending for. Finally, the third storyline is set in the future and is given no explanation at all. All you know is that Tommy (still Hugh Jackman) is floating through space in a clear bubble with nothing but a tree. He keeps having flash backs of Izzi and the book she was writing. Now that all of that is out of the way, let's get to what's good. I like that Darren Aronofsky is trying to do something different and epic. This is a romance that spreads across time and beyond. However, the execution just isn't as good as it could have been (or tries to be). The real high point is the acting. Weisz is beautiful and effective as Izzi, but her character just doesn't have the time to become three dimensional. She makes her affectionate and still worth caring about. But the real star and the film's highest point is Hugh Jackman. This is definitely his finest performance. He brings menacing anger to Tomas, and subtle beauty in the futuristic scenes. But the central plotline is where he shines. Tommy is a complex man that is so in love with his wife that he is willing to do the seemingly impossible. After 'The Prestige', Hugh Jackman deserves to be nominated for Best Actor for this film. He gives stand-out performances in both, but he owns the screen in 'The Fountain'. The other big stand-out is Ellen Burstyn. Her screen time is fairly short, but she is fierce as Dr. Lillian Guzetti, the head of the project that Tommy is desperately leading. I think that she is more Oscar worthy for Supporting Actress than Weisz is. I think that the film is worth seeing for sure, but it is not the masterpiece that Aronofsky so stubbornly believes it is. But if he keeps trying, I think he may eventually make that masterpiece.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

0

JoeNov 26, 2006

Sure, The Fountain has some great visual scenes and is filled with themes and zen principles. But for me it was not movie, there was no plot or reasoning for any actions that take place. While you may compare this to 2001: A Space Odyssey, Sure, The Fountain has some great visual scenes and is filled with themes and zen principles. But for me it was not movie, there was no plot or reasoning for any actions that take place. While you may compare this to 2001: A Space Odyssey, don't. 2001 was a great movie that could be watched by anyone and not just for it themes or beliefs. This is probably why The Fountain currently scores as a 50 and "2001" scores at an 86 on Metacritic. Whats even worse is that I wasn't able to fall asleep with all the screaming and choppy scenes that kept waking me up. Personally, if this wins an Oscar, I'll feel like stabbing the closest person. Do not go to see this if you want to see a good movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

10

DrewK.Nov 26, 2006

Incredible. Both Hugh Jackman and Darren Aronofsky deserve Oscars, to say the least.

2 of 2 users found this helpful

10

VcohedaNov 25, 2006

The Fountain by Darren Aronofsky is a very interesting film, dealing with the great themes (and dichotomies) of life & death, science & religion, temporality & eternity, and especially of love and how it intersects through all of these. It The Fountain by Darren Aronofsky is a very interesting film, dealing with the great themes (and dichotomies) of life & death, science & religion, temporality & eternity, and especially of love and how it intersects through all of these. It is also a movie which pushes the narrative technique to its farthest boundaries. At first, the movie seems strange and bizarre, incomprehensible (at times), yet it is always visually hypnotic and stimulating. However, once you figure out that the three stories of past, present, and future actually all take place in the present -- that is, that they are all just different perspectives of one man (Jackman the scientist), and that the story in indeed very linear -- the movie starts to come together and make sense. I would agree that some of the dialogue is poorly written, especially between the two leads, but the movie as a whole is undeniably rich, extremely ambitious (blending the conscious and unconscious, reality and fiction) and most importantly, original. Highly Recommended!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

8

ChrisB.Nov 25, 2006

I didn't really like it, but the imagery was beautiful and I left the theater feeling very different than when I went in.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

PaulF.Nov 25, 2006

If you are at all philosophically and or spiritually minded it is a good chance you will love this movie. This is not the type of movie for those who relish

1 of 1 users found this helpful

0

JenniferNov 25, 2006

This movie is like the naive romantic fantasy of a precocious and pretentious11-year-old girl who is writing about topics that she hasn't actually experienced. It may be the most pointless movie I've ever seen. Insulting to This movie is like the naive romantic fantasy of a precocious and pretentious11-year-old girl who is writing about topics that she hasn't actually experienced. It may be the most pointless movie I've ever seen. Insulting to everyone, especially the great actors who signed on for this silliness.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

10

BillyS.Nov 25, 2006

Quite simply, The Fountain is the most breath-takingly stunning visual journey I've witnessed in a movie theatre since I was 18 and saw 2001: A Space Odyssey (and this time I wasn't even high!) Darren Aronofsky is, in my opinion, Quite simply, The Fountain is the most breath-takingly stunning visual journey I've witnessed in a movie theatre since I was 18 and saw 2001: A Space Odyssey (and this time I wasn't even high!) Darren Aronofsky is, in my opinion, the new Kubrick and The Fountain is his version of an old fashioned love story that literally spans centuries and, like 2001, its wide open for any interpretation. Matthew Libatique's cinematography and James Chinlund's production design create one awe-inspiring image after another and the music by Clint Mansell sets free the "oohs and aahs" as you watch the celluloid poetry in front of you. The Fountain is not for everybody, but for this body, it's the Best Film of 2006 so far!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JayP.Nov 25, 2006

Visually stunning, and emotionally moving. That being said, it's not a movie for everyone. I adored it, but it does present the problem of the current level of intelect in this day and age.... it's going to go over most Visually stunning, and emotionally moving. That being said, it's not a movie for everyone. I adored it, but it does present the problem of the current level of intelect in this day and age.... it's going to go over most people's heads.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

8

SG.Nov 24, 2006

Incoherent? Head scratching? Pretentious? Hard to follow? Did I watch the same movie as many of these critics? I don't want to take any unnecessary or pointless swipes at intelligence, but I cannot help but wonder what was so confusing Incoherent? Head scratching? Pretentious? Hard to follow? Did I watch the same movie as many of these critics? I don't want to take any unnecessary or pointless swipes at intelligence, but I cannot help but wonder what was so confusing about this movie. To me, this was simple story. A movie about the most basic human experiences (love and death), and as such is naturally expansive due to the timelessness of these themes. It echoes the feel of the folklore it is based on. There is nothing pretentious or confusing about that. Perhaps the narrative was unclear at first, but it does not take long to determine what the significance of each narrative strand is. While I do argue that the 16th century narrative was the essential flaw of the movie, I will let others feel out their own opinions there. This movie should just be felt and experienced. It is our humanity that makes it easy to identify with the moment we stop trying to make it something it isn't. It is not puzzling, confusing or pretentious and in my opinion not even mind blowing. A visual feast and a simple myth with a sci-fi edge. Abandon the critical analysis and let your gut feel this one out.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

RileyWebsterNov 24, 2006

One of the single greatest movies I've ever seen. Absolutely breathtaking.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

NandoP.Nov 24, 2006

Masterpiece with one of the most beautiful and meaningful message of life in the foreground (although not many critics worry to understand) (or, as David Lynch said, "the movie is its own explanation"). A urgent contemporary manifesto of art Masterpiece with one of the most beautiful and meaningful message of life in the foreground (although not many critics worry to understand) (or, as David Lynch said, "the movie is its own explanation"). A urgent contemporary manifesto of art for life with technical excelence. Applause.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

A-robNov 23, 2006

I could talk all night about this movie. If it has any flaws, I forgive them. The concept and visuals alone are enough for me to fall in love with it.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

DougRNov 23, 2006

Those who weren't moved by this film must have never loved anyone at a level beyond middle school crush.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

FiatluxNov 23, 2006

Not for everyone, but not for the usual reasons. I don't think it's a question of getting it or not getting it, but more a question of how much you are willing to go with it. It's not without its problems: it feels twice as Not for everyone, but not for the usual reasons. I don't think it's a question of getting it or not getting it, but more a question of how much you are willing to go with it. It's not without its problems: it feels twice as long as it is, and it's like being in a state of intense mourning for the duration. It is also a brave and beautiful piece of filmmaking. Aronofsky wears his heart on his sleeve like red wet stain, and I'm glad he fought for this project.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

0

MarkMNov 23, 2006

The 10

0 of 3 users found this helpful

8

DanB.Nov 23, 2006

It's not exactly entertaining, but it *is* good. Or, it's not good, but it's kinda great? I don't know, really. Aside from some high-emotion moments that came off as mawkish rather than affecting, this movie was It's not exactly entertaining, but it *is* good. Or, it's not good, but it's kinda great? I don't know, really. Aside from some high-emotion moments that came off as mawkish rather than affecting, this movie was definitely worthwhile. For it's flaws, it's a hundred times more interesting/better than 90% of what's on screen.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

MichaelS.Nov 23, 2006

Just perfect. But make no mistake, the film is just relentless. Relentlessy cheesy, deep, melodramatic, over-the-top, unflinching, unashamed. There were two specific moments in particular, where all the people sitting directly around me in Just perfect. But make no mistake, the film is just relentless. Relentlessy cheesy, deep, melodramatic, over-the-top, unflinching, unashamed. There were two specific moments in particular, where all the people sitting directly around me in the theatre started laughing. One of those moments, was the climax. Had there not been "intellectuals", artists, art-house filmgoers, mainstream filmgoers or immature emotionally undeveloped people in the audience, I would have enjoyed it even more without people around me laughing at the brilliance onscreen. That being said, it definitely felt like Aronofsky deliberately went out of the way to make a film that very specifically panders to not a single demographic or crowd. It completely depends on the person. But generally, I think most artists intellectuals and art-house cinemaphiles (and especially critics) will absolutely loathe this movie, because it is relentlessly emotional, and completely unashamed. But the themes and concepts, the imagery, it is so cyclical, and all fits perfectly together. I can easily wait 6 more years for Aronofsky's next film, because then I know it'll be at least half as good as this incredibly moving piece of work.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful

8

JimmyC.Nov 22, 2006

I've read a number of preofessional reviews stating that the film is difficult to follow and that the ending is way beyond anything we lowly movie-goers might be able to grasp. I went into the film prepared to leave utterly perplexed-- I've read a number of preofessional reviews stating that the film is difficult to follow and that the ending is way beyond anything we lowly movie-goers might be able to grasp. I went into the film prepared to leave utterly perplexed-- but this was simply not the case. The film is not difficult to follow, and the ending is quite satisfying. There are obviously a number of metaphors throughout, but they are not so complex as to be beyond one's understanding. Certain parts of the film may be interpreted differently, but as a whole it has a rather straight-forward and powerful message about love and death. The visuals and acting are great. The music was appropriate. It's not the best movie of all time, but it's definitely worth seeing.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

YasharZ.Nov 22, 2006

This is a truly strange film. Love it or hate it, it WILL consume you. In my eyes, a true masterpiece.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

daveg.Nov 22, 2006

Mind-blowing.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

1

howellg.Nov 22, 2006

A visually interesting film cannont compensate for inane dialogue. The level of writng seems appropriate for a high school project. A major waste of time.

1 of 3 users found this helpful

10

JeffS.Nov 21, 2006

I know i felt differently than much of the audience but I was transfixed. The movie just washed emotion over me, and even though its narrative flaws and cheese factor were obvious... it still worked amazingly. A powerful experience I will I know i felt differently than much of the audience but I was transfixed. The movie just washed emotion over me, and even though its narrative flaws and cheese factor were obvious... it still worked amazingly. A powerful experience I will not soon forget.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

HorenS.Nov 21, 2006

I was lucky enough today to be able to catch The Fountain at the film festival downtown. To start off, I have always been a huge Aronofsky fan, I introduced my friends to Pi and Requiem, and they are two of my favourite movies. From The I was lucky enough today to be able to catch The Fountain at the film festival downtown. To start off, I have always been a huge Aronofsky fan, I introduced my friends to Pi and Requiem, and they are two of my favourite movies. From The Fountain's inception in the early 2000's, I have followed all of its foibles and developmental issues. The script was originally approved with Pitt and Blanchett to star in the leading roles. Pitt left to film Troy and the project was thrown on the back burner. In 2004 the film re-emerged with a budget half of the original and was cast with Jackman and Weisz. As is expected when one follows things for such a long time, excitement builds and there is always the wish for what you are about to experience to be spectacular. This is one of those instances where one is awestruck and that excitement has not been crushed by the feeling of disappointment. Without a doubt, The Fountain by Darren Aronofsky is one of the best films I have seen this year, if not one of the best films of the decade. Future viewings and time will tell if the latter holds true. I'm not even sure where to begin, essentially the plot is set in three different time periods, with Jackman playing a conquistador, a modern scientist/doctor, and a intergalactic voyager all while trying to find a way for Weisz to live as she is terminally ill. The visuals in The Fountain are dazzling. The cinematography is some of the best I have ever seen in my life. The shots are all perfect and the lighting immaculate. Aronofsky seems to have gone with mostly centered shots, which may sound dull at first glance, however, they most definitely are not. It is not as gimmicky or manipulative as Requiem or even Pi were, but the visuals could take your breath away. They are that stunning. To make things even more impressive, they chose not to use CGI for much of the film and instead filmed chemical reactions and formations on petri dishes and were able to extrapolate that into fantastical imagery. As far as the acting goes, this is without a doubt the best work of Hugh Jackman and while Rachel Weisz is also very good, it is mainly Jackman that carries the movie as he is the lead role. I actually enjoyed the rest of the supporting cast even in their small roles. Specifically, Ellen Burstyn, Mark Margolis, and Cliff Curtis. The musical score is just another thing on its own. Clint Mansell, having collaborated in the past for both Pi and Requiem for a Dream creates a most ethereal musical score. The Kronos Quartet, who had the theme song for the movie Requiem for a Dream, entitled Lux Aeterna, and Scottish post rockers Mogwai fill out most of this blissful soundtrack. The music meshes wonderfully with the movie even though there are, three different periods so to speak. Furthermore, the explosions in music, re: Mogwai and the whole post-rock genre completely gels and interlaces with the revelations experienced and ideas expressed within the film. I won't reveal too much as to what unfolds in the movie, however, it is a beautiful story of love, and what one discovers about himself and the world in this quest of undying love. There are so many facets, so many nooks and cranies that this film dares to explore all at once in such majestic fashion it is truely unbelievable. It connects emotionally with the viewer, my heart started palpitating at various points and near the very end my eyes watered up for a good five minutes. Aronofsky explores my ideas and themes in this movie, though the main ones I think are acceptance and duality. The movie is incessantly deep and heavy and therefore requires repeated viewings for sure. Those of you who have seen Pi, this is in many ways a sister movie to that. Just as Pi attempts to understand natural surroundings and life through mathematics, The Fountain follows suit but on the path of spirituality and philosophy. In closing, I still require many hours to ponder the ideas in this movie, in fact I have been watching the trailer nonstop since I got home. Aronofsky possesses immense testicular fortitude to be able to make a film like this for wide release. He has my utmost respect for attempting such an ambitious film that has come across to me at least as highly successful.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful

10

JeffA.Nov 21, 2006

The BEST movie of 2006!!!

1 of 1 users found this helpful

The Fountain

User Reviews