The Expendables 3
Lionsgate | Release Date: August 15, 2014
5.8
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 370 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
144
Mixed:
151
Negative:
75
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
3
BarbudezJul 20, 2015
Stallone en 2010 nos anunció la primera parte de los Mercenarios, donde reuniría a toda la creme de la creme del cine de acción, Bruce Willis, Chuache, Lundgrend, Statham etc. El resultado en términos generales fue.... aceptable y a la vezStallone en 2010 nos anunció la primera parte de los Mercenarios, donde reuniría a toda la creme de la creme del cine de acción, Bruce Willis, Chuache, Lundgrend, Statham etc. El resultado en términos generales fue.... aceptable y a la vez decepcionante, porque la película NO cumplió con las expectativas, una dirección mediocre, personajes desaprovechados,y su gran cagada... QUE SE TOMAN EN SERIO EL FILM, el resultado es un direct to dvd con demasiado Hype por detrás. Dos años después nos llego su segunda parte donde se unía al reparto Chuck Norris, Van Damme y Stallone deja la dirección al director de la fantabulosa CON AIR y abandona el rollo "Zerio, ojcuro y realishta" y no se la toman en serio, y como resultado sale algo QUE ES LO QUE STALLONE NOS PROMETIÓ, una película de tiros, acción desenfrenada y muchas coñas sobre el cine ochentero.

Y llegó la tercera....Y LA CAGÓ.

A ver Stallone, la primera no convenció, la segunda si (que es totalmente opuesta), entonces ¿Que te hace pensar que volver a ese tono que no funcionó, volverá a funcionar? Además de intentar vender un mensajillo de relevo generacional y que luego rectificas a la ultima parte del film. ¿Que intentabas sugerir? ¿Que los actores de acción de ahora son mierda?, vale, ya nos demostraste en la 2, que vosotros sois los amos del cine de acción, no nos hace falta esa burda sátira con tal escasa sutileza.

Aparte del mensajillo cutre y de la involución de la franquicia, la película esta completamente lastrada por elementos que estropean la película.

1-Un PG-13 que roza el insulto, las dos anteriores estaban calificadas R, violencia, mutilaciones, sangre (tanto bolsitas como digital) y esta NO HAY NI UNA MISERA GOTA DE SANGRE, los tiroteos parecen partidas de Airsoft, da la sensación que se les ha olvidado comprar la sangre en el ultimo momento y no podían retrasar el rodaje o que en postproducción alguien con un crucifijo colgado en su pecho, no la ha añadido.

2-El reparto de yogurines, cuando parte de un reparto que tendría que tener relevancia se pueden sustituir por sacos de patatas, macetas u Hombres-Cartel de COMPRO ORO, algo no va bien, y desearía que no volviesen a salir mas, en la hipotética (porque no ha recibido buena recepción en taquilla). Suerte que luego el reparto de abuelos arregla el percal y Banderas, porque les das a esos mastuerzos la voz cantante del film y la hunden en la mierda mas inmunda.

3-Los Efectos Especiales son UNA PUTA MIERDA, se puede pasar que tenga PG-13, que una parte del reparto sean puro relleno, es hasta soportable.... pero me parece de vergüenza que los efectos especiales sean una verdadera PORQUERÍA, No solamente ha involucionado en el estilo, sino que encima involuciona visualmente.

4-La dirección cae en manos de un patán juntaplanos sin personalidad que esta a las ordenes de lo que le dice Stallone, donde se la machaca con peliculas de la calidad de El Marine o cualquier peli random de Stone Cold Austin. Y que encima va a encargarse del remake americano de The Raid.

Lo poco potable, al menos entretiene, ves a gente jugando una partida de Airsoft y ves lo mismo y El Personaje de Antonio Banderas, que me parece el mas divertido del film (Siempre me ha caído bien ese señor).

En Conclusión, ya empiezo a entender de donde han venido las criticas negativas y me parecen muy lógicas, Una involución de la saga, malos FX, y un PG-13 ridículo. No merece la pena pena pagar por un direct to dvd de tercera regional, cosa que es este film.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
DyliebarApr 12, 2019
When there isn't any action happening, which there is a HUGE chunk of the film where there isn't any action, brace yourself, because it's a long sit.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
MovieFanMikeAug 17, 2014
This is the most disapointing movie of the year. I like the first 2 films becuase it showed a bunch of old action heroes doing stuff they really shouldnt because of how old they are. This one completely forgets that and says "let's add someThis is the most disapointing movie of the year. I like the first 2 films becuase it showed a bunch of old action heroes doing stuff they really shouldnt because of how old they are. This one completely forgets that and says "let's add some fresh faces to atract young girls." Are you people high? Dull action, script, characters. I really can't find anything I liked. 3/10 - Terrible.… Expand
9 of 12 users found this helpful93
All this user's reviews
0
imthenoobAug 18, 2014
I can stomach an action film but this one was absolute garbage and I agree with other reviews in saying that it may have well killed this once promising franchise. Terrible acting, Far too many cast members (probably would have had betterI can stomach an action film but this one was absolute garbage and I agree with other reviews in saying that it may have well killed this once promising franchise. Terrible acting, Far too many cast members (probably would have had better dialogue with thinner numbers), and a god awful plot that was painfully predictable.… Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
1
GundamMarsAug 16, 2014
So really quick, did you catch this in theaters or did you watch it online?

Stallone and crew (sort of) are back for Expendables 3 and the movie sucks horribly. It's a horrible action movie, it's a horrible Stallone movie, it's a horribleSo really quick, did you catch this in theaters or did you watch it online?

Stallone and crew (sort of) are back for Expendables 3 and the movie sucks horribly. It's a horrible action movie, it's a horrible Stallone movie, it's a horrible Expendables movie. Ask yourself, "Why do you like the Expendables?" Your answer should because it's a movie that brings together the action stars of the 80s and 90s in a explosive, action-fest we've been dreaming about. This movie throws that premise out the window quick and gives you modern action crap that's as dull and boring as modern dramas. We came to see our action favorites battle it out on screen with the bad guys, not a bunch of new nobodies no one cares about. Seriously, they toss out Stallone's team for most of the movie for the sake of introducing a load of new people you won't care about. We even get a VERY dull montage of Stallone picking up the new recruits with Kelsey Grammer's character and this is where the film dies for about 30 minutes. It was so long and boring I had trouble staying awake. We get 2 dull White guys, a girl who looks like a guy and a INCREDIBLY ANNOYING Antonio Banderas to round out the new additions. Really though, why did they make Banderas so F-ing irritating? Speaking of new additions Wesley Snipes, Mel Gibson and Harrison "I shot first!" Ford make their Expendables debut. While seeing these guys on screen for this was kinda cool they really didn't do anything, especially Ford who came off as tired and looking bored. I never expected this movie to have Oscar quality acting, but at least give a damn. The action scenes were flashy, although not interesting, seriously how come we went from the gore and guts of Expendables 1 to the no blood and knives in the back crap of Expendables 3. These movies are supposed to be love letters to the action packed movies of a begone era right? So how come they can't get the level of over the top violence right? As far as action movies go this one was bad, real bad. It's a bad action flick and it's a slap in the face to Expendables fans who like/loved the first 2 movies. If this movie were to play on TNT on a Saturday afternoon they wouldn't have to worry about editing anything out. It's that tame. Do yourself a favor and skip this one and hope the 4th one is better.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
0
sonlc360Aug 19, 2014
The movie is wrong. The concept is great though - starring all the action movie celebrities. Remember Cowboy and Aliens with Harrison Ford and Daniel Craig? Same happened here. Explosions, shooting, fake drama isn't just wrong - it'sThe movie is wrong. The concept is great though - starring all the action movie celebrities. Remember Cowboy and Aliens with Harrison Ford and Daniel Craig? Same happened here. Explosions, shooting, fake drama isn't just wrong - it's annoying! I felt like this movie forced me to become stupid so that I can enjoy it. And I would enjoy it, had they wrote a better story. Awful… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
1
djniceyAug 17, 2014
I thought this movie was a complete waste of time. It was nowhere near as entertaining as the first two Expendables that I really enjoyed. The plot was extremely weak, chock full of cliches and was completely predictable. I know that's kindI thought this movie was a complete waste of time. It was nowhere near as entertaining as the first two Expendables that I really enjoyed. The plot was extremely weak, chock full of cliches and was completely predictable. I know that's kind of the point with these films, but this one doesn't pull it off well. You always know whats coming next with this film, it doesn't have any surprises or interesting scenes. The actors are far too good for the plot.

It was also a bad idea reducing the rating to PG-13, I had a bunch of inconsiderate kids in front of me that couldn't stop texting every 5 minutes. In trying to expand the market for this film the producers have just made it suck more. I doubt I'll be watching 4, if it ever gets made.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
2
Sky-MoondriftAug 23, 2014
It's like someone put all my favorite actors into a blender with all the wrong ingredients.

The story was just pathetic and reminded me of those foreign B-grade knock-offs of action movies. The scripts were just horrible, the dialoguesIt's like someone put all my favorite actors into a blender with all the wrong ingredients.

The story was just pathetic and reminded me of those foreign B-grade knock-offs of action movies. The scripts were just horrible, the dialogues were awkward and felt forced. Jet li in particular didn't appear to put any effort into his part, not that I could blame him.

There was no chemistry going on at all and the relentless cheese-ball anecdotes made me cringe in embarrassment. Time to fold up that directors chair Sly.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
2
x295xAug 23, 2014
The end of the movie was the sigh of relief. My eyes needed to take a break probably every minute. Hilarious much? Nope. Corny as hell. Wouldn't even re-watch this piece of junk if they paid me a billion dollars.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
1
BeAwesomeOneAug 15, 2014
I saw this movie, instead of Guardians Of The Galaxy... now, I'm regretting this. This movie was pretty and it killed this franchise. Just... just watch Guardians Of The Galaxy instead.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
0
pedosupremeAug 15, 2014
Hands down worst movie of 2014! And it's only August!

there cant possibly be a worst movie than this with all the cheesy **** dialogue. Plot was hilariously bad. So many actors that were pathetic and just pointless. And **** all youHands down worst movie of 2014! And it's only August!

there cant possibly be a worst movie than this with all the cheesy **** dialogue. Plot was hilariously bad. So
many actors that were pathetic and just pointless. And **** all you idiots that pay money for dumb **** like this, don't EVER mention this piece of **** again. ****ing embarrassing… Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
1
BuffMovieguyAug 15, 2014
This movie is an absolute piece of crap! It is worst than the first and second movies put together. Never in my life have a seen such a overblown and pointless movie. The only character to watch is Mel Gibson as he makes a pretty good bad guyThis movie is an absolute piece of crap! It is worst than the first and second movies put together. Never in my life have a seen such a overblown and pointless movie. The only character to watch is Mel Gibson as he makes a pretty good bad guy but everyone else is lazy and uninteresting. Please do not send your money watching this movie.....u have been warned.… Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
0
angel1012Sep 23, 2014
this movie sucked and isnt worth watching I have seen it and the others if both my hands had nothing but thumbs id give it 10 thumbs down.....I will not recommend none of my friends or family to watch nor spend a single dime watchingthis movie sucked and isnt worth watching I have seen it and the others if both my hands had nothing but thumbs id give it 10 thumbs down.....I will not recommend none of my friends or family to watch nor spend a single dime watching it.....Expendable movie no doubt i would burn it if it was given to me.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
2
Jebu911Sep 18, 2014
I'm the kind of person that watches movies like this. My favorite guilty pleasure movies are all pretty much Arnold Schwarzenegger action movies but this movie... Seriously what the hell Stallone? I went into the movie exited to see someI'm the kind of person that watches movies like this. My favorite guilty pleasure movies are all pretty much Arnold Schwarzenegger action movies but this movie... Seriously what the hell Stallone? I went into the movie exited to see some decent action and a plot that doesn't take itself too seriously but what i got was plot recycled from the previous movies and it took itself wayyy too seriously for what it was. I dont think anyone understood what the hell was going on in stallones characters head when he was randomly ditching the old crew and recruiting some rookie ones for pretty much no damn reason. Only the end shootout was decent and I loved Mel Gibsons character and his acting skills far surpassed all the other actors. Those 2 points i give to the movie come from the few great scenes delivered by Mel and Schwarzenegger that try breaking the general stiffness of the movie but are too little too late to make this even a decent movie. I sincerely hope no more expendables movies ever come out because 1 and 2 was decent but this was just pure crap.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
yusepNov 17, 2014
I really liked the first 2 films but this 3rd one is just boring. I know this is not hamlet, but the first 2 movies had clear characters with some personality traits but in this one all the new characters are just plain characters with notI really liked the first 2 films but this 3rd one is just boring. I know this is not hamlet, but the first 2 movies had clear characters with some personality traits but in this one all the new characters are just plain characters with not personality neither importance in the plot. same for the old crew, they are just puppets that does not think or breath.
As I said, I don't expect hamlet, but Expendables and expendables had nice characters, the Expendables 3 does not.
the script is just bad, there is no clear plot, except "kill that guy" and the movie just passes with dull action sequences.
The best of the movie is Antonio Banderas character, unfortunately his character is not needed in the story ( none of them ) and is totally accesory.

Actually all the characters could be removed, except silvester Stallone and Mel Guibson and the movie could explain the same.

Really dissapointed, I loved Expendables 1 and 2. I hope the 4th one will go back to what it as before.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
flametail23Dec 1, 2014
This movie is one of the worst I have seen all year. It's not fun, there's no blood and the new Expendables really suck. The only good part about this movie is the Eminem song they have in the movie.
3/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
SpiRoOct 25, 2014
Jesus Christ this movie is a **** garbage. My expectations of this movie were low to begin with and i can assure you that this movie met my expectations in every term and exceeded them in first 40 minutes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
kratos565Aug 29, 2014
oh my god, this movie is bad, very bad. The second was much better. Do not pay for this movie. Sylvester Stallone should not make films "The Expendables" :(
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
GretchenMannSep 7, 2014
Back in my teens and early twenties, my friends and I watched the “Billy Jack” film series. We always had a great time with loud (and occasionally beer-addled) guffaws because we were sure that the Billy Jack movies were the worst that wouldBack in my teens and early twenties, my friends and I watched the “Billy Jack” film series. We always had a great time with loud (and occasionally beer-addled) guffaws because we were sure that the Billy Jack movies were the worst that would or could ever hit the big screen. We were wrong. Dave and I watched “The Expendables III” in Paris on Thursday. At first we considered finding it in its original English for better comprehension, but as it turned out, the film could have been in any or no language and it wouldn’t have made any difference at all.

If there’s anything worse than a “chick flick”, it’s a “dick flick”. The “Expendables III” was a loud shoot-em-up experience from the get go. From the opening scenes to the grand explosive finale, there was no plot, no audible or decipherable dialog, and no discernable acting. This was a movie for testosterone-fueled 17 year-old boys with pizza faces. The goal of every character in the film was to kill as many people as feasible, to destroy as many structures as possible, and to bomb and burn as much of their surroundings as imaginable. It was non-stop mayhem. As usual, the bad guys had the worst aim possible allowing for the escape of the good guys through hails of bullets from guns as big as…. well, you know…. the hardly sublimated fantasies of the targeted crowd for this film. I asked Dave if he could tell the difference between the good guys and the bad guys. He said, “Sure, the bad guys are wearing the red hats.” Now really, if you and your hundreds of fellow red hats were being annihilated by a tiny group of muscular air heads, wouldn't you just get rid of the hat? The expendables were so thick headed that they wouldn’t have known the difference - really.

The only member of the cast who showed a modicum of acting was Mel Gibson who played himself - a maniacal, malevolent nut-case. Gibson must have been gratefully willing to accept just about any role in Hollywood after having sabotaged his career by insulting every Jewish producer in town. One of the biggest and most unfunny inside jokes was when the character played by Wesley Snipes was rescued by his berserk compatriots from a top-security prison where he spent eight years for “tax evasion”. Ha Ha ha ha…. no, not really. Sly Stallone’s character strutted his stuff and I admit he looked pretty good, especially for a 68 year-old. I don’t remember what he said in the film, but the directors clearly put more importance on the fit of his military fatigues than on the importance of his script. Harrison Ford, I am truly, truly sorry to say, looked every bit of his 72 years. I love older men and find them very attractive, but Ford just appeared silly in those armored helicopters. Oh where did you go, Hans Solo? Arnold Schwarzenegger chomped on cigars and pretended to deliver clever repartees. Antonio Banderas played such a sycophantic blabbermouth that even I would have shot him with his very own gun! Terry Crews was there too. He looked good with all those oiled muscles, but I don’t think he could ever top his role of President Camacho in “Idiocracy”. Fortunately for him, he was wounded at the beginning of the movie and was mercifully spared the humiliation of further “dialog”. Lo and behold, he miraculously recovered by the end of the spectacle….. never saw that coming! Then there was a group of young whippersnappers amongst the band of the new expendables who used COMPUTERS! Of course the older, wiser and more experienced guys were only slightly impressed and taught these youngsters a thing or two about real, down-and-dirty combat when push came to shove. We don’t need no stinkin’ technology! Just give me a bigger p***s oops, I mean gun. One of the newcomers to the expendable team was a blonde bombshell in an overly tight and short red dress. I’m trying desperately to block any potential images in my mind of the pizza faces with their 3-D glasses when that actress walked onto the screen. She worked as a bouncer in a disreputable night club and regularly walloped big guys by kicking them in the face and in the groin. She laid them out cold on the floor while rolling her eyes as if she were entirely bored with the whole exercise. Even this dominatrix couldn’t speak one intelligent word.

Dolph Lundgren, Jet Li, Kelsey Grammer (Kelsey Grammer?), and all the rest were cringeworthy. In spite of it all, we just saw one person leave the theater before the end of the film. I looked after her with envy, but stayed put just in case David was enjoying the movie. I could, I suppose, point out that this was a matinee and there were only six people in the entire audience. That means 17% of the audience bailed on the show. As it turns out, Dave and I were both doing the same thing and both waiting for the film to end.

Some films are quite entertaining even if some suspension of disbelief is required. However, even that couldn't save this film. If you really feel masochistic, see a chick flick.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
uguranoOct 12, 2014
most disapointed movie i ever see it. cgi worst, look the beginning of this crap movie. xD

expendablee 1, and 2 best, 3 worst movie i ever see it, worst,worst,worst
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
NovastreamSep 16, 2014
Yeah, I kind of liked it.

Hmm? What’s that? I need to say more? Well… if I must. The Expendables 3 was an action movie that typifies the genre. It’s loud, there are frequent explosions and the protagonists survive through situationsYeah, I kind of liked it.

Hmm? What’s that? I need to say more?

Well… if I must.

The Expendables 3 was an action movie that typifies the genre. It’s loud, there are frequent explosions and the protagonists survive through situations that no mere mortal could ever walk away from.

The script is predictable, though that isn’t really a criticism. If you want an adrenaline-pumping action movie you’re not really there for the story. Which, really, isn’t bad; again, it’s predictable because it’s Action Movie: The Movie, and at that it excels. If you’ve seen an Expendables movie before, prepare yourself for some serious deja-vu.

The basic plot is that an old enemy, played by Mel Gibson, has risen from the proverbial grave and Barny, Sylvester Stallone, deems his team ‘too old’ for this line of work, replacing them with some fresh faces. Until they get predictably captured and the old warhorses have to be brought out to save them. I would say spoilers but, again, if you’re familiar with movies at all none of this will come as a surprise to you, and knowing will detract nothing from your viewing experience.

The almost-entirely-male cast is thoroughly likeable, engaging in a feature-film length contest of ‘who can be the awesomest’ (I don’t care what Word thinks, awesomest is a word), a contest which is used as the framework from which to hang countless excellent stunts and badarse moments. These moments are done exceptionally well and are, quite frankly, the sole reason this movie holds together – so any excuse to have more of them is welcomed with open arms.

The one exception to the likable cast is the sole female character. She just feels like a desperate bid in an otherwise male-dominated movie. This movie fails every possible interpretation of the Bechdel test, the now-infamous metric of just how sexist a movie is. Here’s a hint: For two female characters to have a conversation about something other than men, you need a second female character. Still, it wouldn’t be quite so bad if she weren’t the least-enjoyable screen presence, with every line delivered with an aggravating sneer that just seemed so out of place. She wasn’t as friendly as the blokes and, worse still, she lacked the rogue’s charm that her male counterparts had in spades.

The star power of this film is tremendous, though I still haven’t decided if it’s a good thing or a bad thing. A lot of the movie is about the original team being too old to play mercenary, and it comes across as a bit too… well, apt. Sylvester Stallone is 68 years old now and Arnie follows close behind at 67, and they’re starting to look and sound their age. Portions of the movie are rendered cringe inducing by this fact. Harrison Ford? We all remember that infamous line from Indiana Jones. “It belongs in a museum!” “So do you!” Shockingly, of the three, he’s probably aged the best, in spite of the five years he’s got on Schwarzenegger.

How did the young blood hold up to the old money, though?

Well, I can’t remember a single one of the replacement Expendable’s names, and I walked out of the cinema less than an hour ago as of writing this. I remember all the older, original cast’s, I remember their quirks and charm. I wouldn’t be able to pick the younger ones out of a lineup, again, with the rest of the movie still so fresh in my mind.

Oh, I also remember being really friggin’ annoyed by a couple of missiles, bombs and other miscellaneous explosives that went off right next to the protagonists, including a friggin’ thermobaric missile, and they simply rode the shockwaves and walked it off. Yes, I know it’s a staple of action movies to be pushed away from the explosion and survive it with more damage to your clothes than anything else but, I mean, come on. If someone tells you they were within two meters of of a missile the size of a truck when it detonated they are either a liar or being contacted via séance.

Those are just petty grievances though. If you want big, dumb, loud and shooty, this is definitely the film to watch. Just, for your own safety, turn your brain off at the door.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
EpicLadySpongeApr 22, 2016
When there's too much great actors (You expect Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Antonio Banderas, Jet Li, Wesley Snipes, Dolph Lundgren, Kelsey Grammer, Randy Couture, Terry Crews, Kellan Lutz, Ronda Rousey, Glen Powell, Victor Ortiz,When there's too much great actors (You expect Sylvester Stallone, Jason Statham, Antonio Banderas, Jet Li, Wesley Snipes, Dolph Lundgren, Kelsey Grammer, Randy Couture, Terry Crews, Kellan Lutz, Ronda Rousey, Glen Powell, Victor Ortiz, Robert Davi, Mel Gibson, Harrison Ford, and Arnold Schwarzenegger to come play together in one big movie and result in a great combo? Well, you're wrong), there should be too much fun. Unfortunately, the Expendables 3 failed to get this golden rule correctly.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
AngusBarbudezSep 14, 2016
"Los MEHrcenarios"

Stallone en 2010 nos anunció la primera parte de los Mercenarios, donde reuniría a toda la creme de la creme del cine de acción, Bruce Willis, Chuache, Lundgrend, Statham etc. El resultado en términos generales fue...."Los MEHrcenarios"

Stallone en 2010 nos anunció la primera parte de los Mercenarios, donde reuniría a toda la creme de la creme del cine de acción, Bruce Willis, Chuache, Lundgrend, Statham etc. El resultado en términos generales fue.... aceptable y a la vez decepcionante, porque la película NO cumplió con las expectativas, una dirección mediocre, personajes desaprovechados,y su gran cagada... QUE SE TOMAN EN SERIO EL FILM, el resultado es un direct to dvd con demasiado Hype por detrás. Dos años después nos llego su segunda parte donde se unía al reparto Chuck Norris, Van Damme y Stallone deja la dirección al director de la fantabulosa CON AIR y abandona el rollo "Zerio, ojcuro y realishta" y no se la toman en serio, y como resultado sale algo QUE ES LO QUE STALLONE NOS PROMETIÓ, una película de tiros, acción desenfrenada y muchas coñas sobre el cine ochentero.

Y llegó la tercera....Y LA CAGÓ.

A ver Stallone, la primera no convenció, la segunda si (que es totalmente opuesta), entonces ¿Que te hace pensar que volver a ese tono que no funcionó, volverá a funcionar? Además de intentar vender un mensajillo de relevo generacional y que luego rectificas a la ultima parte del film. ¿Que intentabas sugerir? ¿Que los actores de acción de ahora son mierda?, vale, ya nos demostraste en la 2, que vosotros sois los amos del cine de acción, no nos hace falta esa burda sátira con tal escasa sutileza.

Aparte del mensajillo cutre y de la involución de la franquicia, la película esta completamente lastrada por elementos que estropean la película.

1-Un PG-13 que roza el insulto, las dos anteriores estaban calificadas R, violencia, mutilaciones, sangre (tanto bolsitas como digital) y esta NO HAY NI UNA MISERA GOTA DE SANGRE, los tiroteos parecen partidas de Airsoft, da la sensación que se les ha olvidado comprar la sangre en el ultimo momento y no podían retrasar el rodaje o que en postproducción alguien con un crucifijo colgado en su pecho, no la ha añadido.

2-El reparto de yogurines, cuando parte de un reparto que tendría que tener relevancia se pueden sustituir por sacos de patatas, macetas u Hombres-Cartel de COMPRO ORO, algo no va bien, y desearía que no volviesen a salir mas, en la hipotética (porque no ha recibido buena recepción en taquilla). Suerte que luego el reparto de abuelos arregla el percal y Banderas, porque les das a esos mastuerzos la voz cantante del film y la hunden en la mierda mas inmunda.

3-Los Efectos Especiales son UNA PUTA MIERDA, se puede pasar que tenga PG-13, que una parte del reparto sean puro relleno, es hasta soportable.... pero me parece de vergüenza que los efectos especiales sean una verdadera PORQUERÍA, No solamente ha involucionado en el estilo, sino que encima involuciona visualmente.

4-La dirección cae en manos de un patán juntaplanos sin personalidad que esta a las ordenes de lo que le dice Stallone, donde se la machaca con peliculas de la calidad de El Marine o cualquier peli random de Stone Cold Austin. Y que encima va a encargarse del remake americano de The Raid.

Lo poco potable, al menos entretiene, ves a gente jugando una partida de Airsoft y ves lo mismo y El Personaje de Antonio Banderas, que me parece el mas divertido del film (Siempre me ha caído bien ese señor).

En Conclusión, ya empiezo a entender de donde han venido las criticas negativas y me parecen muy lógicas, Una involución de la saga, malos FX, y un PG-13 ridículo. No merece la pena pena pagar por un direct to dvd de tercera regional, cosa que es este film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

35 Critic Reviews

5.8 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL