Universal Pictures | Release Date: August 4, 2017
4.5
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 394 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
110
Mixed:
136
Negative:
148
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
7
Astor_Aug 1, 2018
Based on the bestselling book series by highly acclaimed author Stephen King, The last Gunslinger, Roland(Idris Elba), has been locked in an eternal battle with the Man in Black (Matthew McConaughey), determined to prevent him from topplingBased on the bestselling book series by highly acclaimed author Stephen King, The last Gunslinger, Roland(Idris Elba), has been locked in an eternal battle with the Man in Black (Matthew McConaughey), determined to prevent him from toppling the Dark Tower, which hold the universe together. With the fate of the worlds at stake, good and evil will collide in the epic battle as only Roland can defend the Tower from the Man in Black.

--

I begun watching this with mixed expectation. Was a bit disappointed to see yet film based on 'kids'. That alone makes it hard to take the film seriously. It's a fact there is a limit to how well kids can act compared to full fletched young adult or adult actors/actresses.

The ideas and concepts are good. Though not exactly original, with respect to demons eyeing to dominate human world. They still make a good general concept for a good story. However the idea that kids' minds (after being strapped to machines) can be used to destroy the tower, is a really silly concept. I generally like the film as I was watching it. The pacing is alright. Actions are well choreographed. The plots lack depth, and have the problem of being kinda predictable.

Characters are all underdeveloped for the most part, except for Roland where the film shows some key aspects of his past. The villain (Man in Black) is pretty cool and ruthless, and have some nice abilities, most notably the ability to command any human to do what he commanded at will, with a simple spoken command. It would be nice if the film delve deeper into his background character and his past.

If you like The Mortal Instruments (film), give this a watch.

Plot: 3.5/5
Characters: 3/5
Action: 4/5
Worth a watch in cinema: Yes, if you like action and okay with simple plots.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
CommonsenseAug 11, 2017
Too many seriously negative reviews. Let me try to explain, I've read all the books, all 8. This movie is in no way even an adaptation of those books. It is pure Hollywood and is why so many loyal King readers feel their years of waiting forToo many seriously negative reviews. Let me try to explain, I've read all the books, all 8. This movie is in no way even an adaptation of those books. It is pure Hollywood and is why so many loyal King readers feel their years of waiting for the perfect Dark Tower movie have been cheated and crushed. Especially with the success of Harry Potter and Game of Thrones from book to screen. That being said, this movie is not poorly done. For the budget, they do a great job at bringing a wealth of action and scenery as well as a cast that does a very good job at selling what they've been given. I went with 2 people who have never read the books and both said they enjoyed the film and were now intrigued in the books especially if it is better than what they just watched, which they most certainly are. If you have never read the books, give it a try and don't bother with the negative reviews from fanboys. If you have read the books, understand the perfect Dark Tower movie may never get made and thats OK. Even an average one can bring even more into our universe and have people reading such a fascinating story, which in turn may let to more creative minds than these to develop an even better version. Expand
8 of 13 users found this helpful85
All this user's reviews
8
junky_andyAug 16, 2017
I knew nothing about The Dark Tower going into the film. I thought it was a great movie. As entertaining as any of the marvel films I've watched over the past 10 summers. It introduced a exciting universe that I want more of. Why the badI knew nothing about The Dark Tower going into the film. I thought it was a great movie. As entertaining as any of the marvel films I've watched over the past 10 summers. It introduced a exciting universe that I want more of. Why the bad reviews? Because Marvel fanboy is less critical than Stephen King fanboy. Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
7
ForeglowAug 8, 2017
The Dark Tower is nowhere near as bad as the critics and fans are making it out to be. Despite the trailers making this look like a straight up action film with bad dialogue, it is in fact a fantasy story containing acting and directing soThe Dark Tower is nowhere near as bad as the critics and fans are making it out to be. Despite the trailers making this look like a straight up action film with bad dialogue, it is in fact a fantasy story containing acting and directing so good that you will forget the script's sometimes lackluster lines. Good actors can make a bad line disappear, and these actors do just that. It's very loosely based on the books, and is considered a continuation rather than an adaptation.

The movie centers around a psychic boy named Jake, a cowboy-knight named Roland, an evil Man In Black named Walter, and a Dark Tower that holds the universe together by keeping monsters out. The Man In Black wishes to destroy the Tower so he can rule a chaotic universe. He needs Jake to destroy the tower. Jake needs to find Roland to save him from the Man In Black. Roland seeks the Man In Black for revenge. Each character pursues another, and around and around they go.

The movie does a better job of laying the groundwork than the first book in the series, in many regards. Of course, the first book is notoriously confusing. Just like the first book, 3 of the main characters have been left out. This non-departure from the source material helps to facilitate a digestable entrypoint for newcomers.

Idris Elba is wonderful as Roland. Some people argue he does not fit the description of Roland in the book, and they would be right. Roland is described as an ugly Clint Eastwood/Steven King look alike, who appears emaciated and ancient beyond belief. Mr. Elba is none of these things. However, he understands how to convey all the necessary aspects of the character. He is full of grit and grump, beleaguered, yet heroic. His performance has convinced many a skeptic to sing his praises, with good cause.

Tom Taylor plays an excellent Jake. He fully embodies the worry of a troubled boy who may be going insane, but also the innocence and excitement of someone finding a portal to another world. Child actors often get a well-deserved bad rap, but Tom Taylor delivers every line perfectly.

Matthew Mcconaughey was really and truly awful as The Man In Black despite having come so far as an actor and playing such wonderful roles in the last few years. As an all powerful wizard, he was neither intimidating nor believable, opting for an over-the-top take on the character that just doesn't work. It's understandable why he went that route. The rest of the movie allows for, and even encourages, over-the-top at times. However, that was the greatest weakness of the film, and Mcconaughey's performance is the embodiment of that weakness.

The score varied from average to well-above average, rarely grabbing your attention, but always fueling the emotions on screen. The cinematography, particularly of the first two thirds, is some of the best in years. Praise should also be cast on the editing. Contrary to the cut-per-milisecond style that has become ever so popular in modern movies--and especially action scenes--The Dark Tower does not fear lingering on a beautiful scene and letting you soak in it, or staying with a character as we see emotions fully processed through their face and body. It's as if the editor knew that they didn't need to cut haphazardly to instill a false sense of excitement, or to cut away from a less than genuine performance. They trusted the story, visuals, and acting to hold our attention, and that faith was well placed. At least, it was well placed for the first two thirds, before falling into so-so territory by the last third.

The movie should also be praised for doing with $60 million what many others fail to do with $120 milliom. I'm looking at you Assassin's Creed. The ambition of this project far surpasses others, despite the budgetary constraints.

The humour peppered here and there was phenominal as well. Marvel has the jarring idea lately that they should throw humour into every nook and cranny possible, hoping the 15 good jokes make up for the 15 that fell flat. No such philosophy is necessary here. For the first time in years, I felt like every joke worked. None of it felt forced.

Of course, the movie had its problems. The tone should have been dark. It was too over-the-top for its own good. It added the strange element of futuristic technology that was completely absent in the books, and the technology was overdone in the style of bad science fiction. The costuming department seemed to think they were making a new Matrix movie, instead of the dusty cowboy/fantasty it should have been.

It wasn't a great movie, but considering the source material is known for being unfilmable, it's a shock they made a coherent movie at all. I have newfound confidence that they can learn from the mistakes of this film and make a truly great second installment. Hopefully they do, so we may meet the other three main characters (yes, Oy the talking dog counts!), hear some ZZ Top backbeat, and maybe even meet Blaine the Train.
Expand
8 of 14 users found this helpful86
All this user's reviews
7
marcmyworksAug 7, 2017
Having never read the books I cannot compare this film as harshly as the critics have. To me it was a decent action flick, in which Idris Elba does a good job. It felt more like the prologue for a series of indepth movies, but I still respectHaving never read the books I cannot compare this film as harshly as the critics have. To me it was a decent action flick, in which Idris Elba does a good job. It felt more like the prologue for a series of indepth movies, but I still respect the effort. Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
7
chidimeOct 13, 2017
Come on. This movie wasn't that bad to have a 4.0 score. Minimum I would give it is a 6/10. Had it's issues, the most glaring of which was that it failed to set up characer backgrounds properly such that if a character died, we feel theCome on. This movie wasn't that bad to have a 4.0 score. Minimum I would give it is a 6/10. Had it's issues, the most glaring of which was that it failed to set up characer backgrounds properly such that if a character died, we feel the impact. I felt nothing when Jake's mom died or even when Walter died. If the emotional impact was felt, the movie could have been an 8 or 9. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
FiestykittenOct 10, 2017
I wasn't expecting much based on the poor reception but really enjoyed it. It seemed a tad rushed in places but as a fantasy adventure movie it hit the right notes and had strong performances. It might not compare at all to the books andI wasn't expecting much based on the poor reception but really enjoyed it. It seemed a tad rushed in places but as a fantasy adventure movie it hit the right notes and had strong performances. It might not compare at all to the books and might not be strong enough to kick off a franchise but if you just want a fun 90 minutes, give it a go. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
8
Voodoo123Oct 17, 2017
+Excellent visual style
+Keeps a good pace +Memorable action sequences
+Impressive cast deliver great performances -According to fans deviates/simplifies the plot from the book series Went in with low expectations given the negative review
+Excellent visual style
+Keeps a good pace +Memorable action sequences
+Impressive cast deliver great performances
-According to fans deviates/simplifies the plot from the book series

Went in with low expectations given the negative review from critics and book fans, however having not read the books I can say I was more entertained than I expected going in to this. As a fan of sci-fi/Stephen King adaptations/action films I can say this is an entertaining blend of all three! Highly recommend this.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
GamingNinjaMay 9, 2018
A very enjoyable movie, all the hate seems a bit harsh. Never read the books though.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
blabla88Oct 15, 2017
It's a very fun to watch fantasy movie and i loved the acting of Elba and McConaughey. I watched it without knowing it was a movie based on a book, so my score is based on the movie itself and not for being a good or bad adaptation. However,It's a very fun to watch fantasy movie and i loved the acting of Elba and McConaughey. I watched it without knowing it was a movie based on a book, so my score is based on the movie itself and not for being a good or bad adaptation. However, the movie felt a bit like it was too much story and too little time to tell it. I would've like the movie to be longer, or made with multiple parts. After the movie i looked up the books and there is much more they could do with that, a shame they didn't. But overall the movie was fun to watch. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
moviesoulAug 12, 2017
I really liked this film. I don't have the background (baggage?) of having read the Dark Tower novels - I was just looking for an enjoyable way to spend two hours on a Saturday afternoon. I found the movie fast-paced, conceptuallyI really liked this film. I don't have the background (baggage?) of having read the Dark Tower novels - I was just looking for an enjoyable way to spend two hours on a Saturday afternoon. I found the movie fast-paced, conceptually interesting, with very good acting and interesting locales (great on-location scenes in NYC). Idris Elba and Matthew McConaughey are both excellent, and the kid who plays the lead (Tom Taylor) is also very good. I can understand why those who have read the novels might have certain expectations that weren't met (after all, there were several novels and this is a two-hour film), but that doesn't explain the perplexing negative reaction of the critics, who should judging this film on its own merits. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
9
HealingToolbox1Sep 4, 2017
Cinema as mythmaking 101, pay attention. What we have here is a christian and/or metaphysical myth of a LIGHT Tower, A Tower of LIGHT, which keeps the world of waking human beings--and similar worlds--coherent and protected from an outerCinema as mythmaking 101, pay attention. What we have here is a christian and/or metaphysical myth of a LIGHT Tower, A Tower of LIGHT, which keeps the world of waking human beings--and similar worlds--coherent and protected from an outer universe it perceives as monstrous and demonic. Thats one myth-archetype.

Next myth is a TV Western gunslinger written only two-dimensionally but brought to life by Idris Elba. That's two myths-archetypes.

Next is the Satan-Devil figure, given the 2D writing, done as well as I think Marvel could do him in Matthew's fine performance. That's three myths-archetypes. Then we have the boy-coming-of-age myth, Heroes Journey myth and common sub-myths and tropes. Tried and true mythmaking is what critics get awfully tired of. However, the audience I saw it with cheered and clearly several were seeing it at least a second time. Mythmaking done well is always a crowd pleaser.

I liked it. Why? It's done with conviction. Not often do we see a POSITIVE LIGHT Tower as a mythic element in a script. Compare with LOTRings where all the towers and mountains are negative downers. The LOTR Elf kingdom is more hospitable but plays only a minor role. Could this be extended into a series on TV, on film? Hard to say. From skimming the Wikipedia article on the book series, I think making it a young adult film makes more sense than a literal translation of book plot to filmed script. However the film makes little to no attempt to suggest where a sequel to the movie might go. It may be myself and only a few other esoteric-Christian mystics who see in this Dark Tower a LIGHT Tower.
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
9
arcubalAug 24, 2017
If you want a scene-by-scene interpretation of the book: forget it. But if (like me) you appreciate the creative translation that is necessary to make a movie work, than you'll be very pleased. Way more engaging, tightly plotted and solidlyIf you want a scene-by-scene interpretation of the book: forget it. But if (like me) you appreciate the creative translation that is necessary to make a movie work, than you'll be very pleased. Way more engaging, tightly plotted and solidly acted than anything in the book (which was even to King's admission a mess) the movie also boasts a very impressive characterization by Elba and McConaughey while boasting a solid single story (if you don't like open endings) while still allowing for the sequels to be made. Everything about this movie was impressive. Must see. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
samforsythAug 10, 2017
The Dark Tower was a good movie. I feel like I’m not allowed to say that unless I explain myself, so here goes:
I think this movie should have been called “The Gunslinger” because it was about a gunslinger rescuing a boy from a bad guy. And
The Dark Tower was a good movie. I feel like I’m not allowed to say that unless I explain myself, so here goes:
I think this movie should have been called “The Gunslinger” because it was about a gunslinger rescuing a boy from a bad guy. And it does a good job of telling that story.
Calling the movie “The Dark Tower” sets up the expectation that the movie will be about the Dark Tower, but its not. We barely see the Dark Tower, and no action whatever takes place there.
I think SONY did a very awful job of properly promoting this project, and properly setting the audience’s expectations. It should have been made crystal clear that this was not an attempt to tell the stories from the novels, but rather, an attempt to tell a simple story that will introduce key characters, themes, and mysteries that exist in the Dark Tower universe.
It should have been made clear that this was an introduction to this universe, and not the beginning, middle and end of it.
It should have been made clear that the characters, themes, and mysteries that were introduced in this movie were not going to be addressed in depth in this film, but instead, will be fleshed out through upcoming TV series and movie sequels.
If a person knows all that going in, there is a much better chance that they could just relax and enjoy the show. Unfortunately, and through no fault of their own, the viewers just had no idea what to expect going in, and were turned off by a simple quick storyline, huge themes and mysteries being mentioned and then never addressed again, and feeling like they were JUST getting to know the characters just as the thing ended.
I’m super bummed about the bad reviews and the low box office, because now I fear this project will be abandoned… I certainly hope not. But Sony really screwed up.
Expand
9 of 23 users found this helpful914
All this user's reviews
10
Jsum702Aug 6, 2017
The Dark Tower series is my favorite. I've been really nervous about this movie for a long time. My hopes were dashed when the first reviews started pouring in. I knew it was a failure, but I read the positive reviews and decided I stillThe Dark Tower series is my favorite. I've been really nervous about this movie for a long time. My hopes were dashed when the first reviews started pouring in. I knew it was a failure, but I read the positive reviews and decided I still wanted to give the makers my money. I must say I was pleasantly surprised. I knew this movie would never live up to the books, but the movie actually incorporates more of the material then I would've though possible for a 95 minute movie. The story was good, not perfect, but good considering how much material they had to condense to make one movie explain what is going on. The story was a different perspective on the material that and works well as an introduction to The Dark Tower universe. I thought Mcconaughey was effective as the man in black, I still have reservations about Elba playing Roland, but it wasn't bad. All together the movie didn't let me down, and re-enforced the idea that I want to see more of this universe on the screen. Whether it be TV or the movie screen, they'd get my money again. Expand
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
10
insicknessOct 8, 2017
I read the book years ago when it first came out, so I didn't remember much. That being said, this movie wasn't bad. It wasn't fantastic but it was decent. Good acting. Good sci-fi. Good action. Good special effects. Nothing life changing butI read the book years ago when it first came out, so I didn't remember much. That being said, this movie wasn't bad. It wasn't fantastic but it was decent. Good acting. Good sci-fi. Good action. Good special effects. Nothing life changing but fun to watch if you're looking for good sci-fi fantasy adventure. Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
8
ibrahimikSep 15, 2017
this is quite an interesting project, but this film only at one time and the film is not associated with Roman only indirectly. P.S i'ts my mind
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
8
RafaelDaddioAug 24, 2017
Following in the line of thought that the book is only inspirational for the film, and that this is a new interaction in Roland's search for the Dark Tower, I must say... IT'S AWESOME!!! The only reason I did not give 5 stars for this movieFollowing in the line of thought that the book is only inspirational for the film, and that this is a new interaction in Roland's search for the Dark Tower, I must say... IT'S AWESOME!!! The only reason I did not give 5 stars for this movie is that I felt it was too short, not better explaining some of the things that are happening in the plot. But probably some of the novel's concepts were left out or only hinted in order to simplify the movie's premise. No harm with that. Given the low ratings, it'll probably won't have a sequel, which is a shame. Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
8
mirandmrAug 6, 2017
I was originally excited to see this movie when the 1st trailer came out... I hadn't read the books but researched the concepts for the film, getting a general idea of the overarching story. When all the buzz seemed to indicate the movie wasI was originally excited to see this movie when the 1st trailer came out... I hadn't read the books but researched the concepts for the film, getting a general idea of the overarching story. When all the buzz seemed to indicate the movie was a disappointment, I elected to see the film anyway and kept an open mind. If nothing else I'd probably like the leading actors' performance and would see some cool cinematography. The rest of the folks in the theater that saw The Dark Tower with me I think all felt the same way: 'this isn't getting a great buzz, but let's see what it has to offer'.

The Dark Tower gives us a glimpse into a gritty reality, one that ties into visually fantastic worlds and concepts, and portrays characters that were interesting and intriguing; characters you end up liking and if anything, you want to see more of what they have to offer. The movie makes me WANT to read the books; I’m not a filmmaker/film critic/in the film industry, but I would venture a guess that the intended outcome of this film was to get folks interested in the series and for me they succeeded. The film has a "young" director; Nikolaj Arcel has not made that many movies from what I can tell, and this I think shows: if you are looking for flaws in this film you WILL find them… I suppose I’m just willing to forgive the occasional flaw for the sake of having a good time.

We live in a day and age where people want to find things to be upset about, sadly enough. I liked The Dark Tower; it was fun, visually impressive, and only once or twice did its film-making flaws really feel apparent enough to distract.

I walked away from this film enjoying the overall movie-going experience. It's sad that the film's positive qualities are getting overlooked so much... there's a good time to be had with this film if you're willing to let yourself have it.
Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
9
missatx007Aug 5, 2017
A good dystonian romp through a world on the brink. What the movie lacked in a complete backstory it made up for with some good brooding by Idris Elba (all I needed was someone to yell that he was going to cancel this apocalypse and my movieA good dystonian romp through a world on the brink. What the movie lacked in a complete backstory it made up for with some good brooding by Idris Elba (all I needed was someone to yell that he was going to cancel this apocalypse and my movie would had been complete!) As a stand alone movie this made my cut; for all those of you who only want the movie to be like the books...this ain't that type of movie bro. Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
7
yesterdayatnoonAug 5, 2017
Having never read the books, I found the movie quite enjoyable. The action is solid, the story doesn't drag on, it sticks to one type of story without switching modes constantly and the acting is solid. The script isn't amazing. The audioHaving never read the books, I found the movie quite enjoyable. The action is solid, the story doesn't drag on, it sticks to one type of story without switching modes constantly and the acting is solid. The script isn't amazing. The audio effects are astounding. I didn't really expect to see extreme reviews of this movie one way or the other. I recommend it if you're in the mood for straightforward action/fantasy/horror. Expand
2 of 13 users found this helpful211
All this user's reviews
8
KittyWhiskyAug 4, 2017
Stephen King is probably the most filmed writer. "The Dark Tower" — his most famous work. And not without reason. The cycle consists of an eight not small books. They varied in quality, but still dragged them into his world. Rumors about theStephen King is probably the most filmed writer. "The Dark Tower" — his most famous work. And not without reason. The cycle consists of an eight not small books. They varied in quality, but still dragged them into his world. Rumors about the film adaptation began to circulate in 2007, and ten years later we got a film based on the series of novels. This film everyone was waiting for, because in books there is everything you can love a captivating story: a charismatic protagonist, interesting world, inhabited by different dangers, evil villains, and an interesting mythology of the world. But many fans and sympathizers was suspicious of the film before the premiere. Black Roland, that all sin! Yes, and the film will last only 1.5 hours. Also this film is not the film adaptations of the books of the cycle, and their continuation! This is a controversial step. For fans of the great cash not to do a "stray" audience can not understand. But the writers did it! Maybe the fans will complain, they always will be. But for me, as someone who has never read a single book from the series, though, and knows a lot about them, the film exceeded my expectations, which, by the way, was no. Roland — the protagonist of a cycle of novels. Here he plays a talented Idris Elba. Himself Stephen King praised his acting! And even cut some dialogues of Roland, as the Elba, perfectly passed all his facial expressions. I think the Gunslinger could play and Matthew McConaughey, and Idris Elba Man in Black. But we have what we have. Idris Elba has really fine job with the role. Roland is still the same charismatic, and how awesome he is with revolvers! He has his own drama, and not even knowing her backstory from the books, you're still experiencing it with the hero.

Matthew McConaughey plays the Man in Black — main villain of the film, which is pumped from the books. Playing McConaughey nice to watch. When he's on screen, it just steals the stage with her charisma. About him the villain we know almost nothing, and he wants to destroy a Dark tower, to rule the world, but thanks to the game McConaughey, he does not seem so flat villain. Roland, though the hero of the books, but not this film. He is one of the main characters. The engine of this movie is the boy Jake, who has the gift of "the shining". He foresees things and sees "the middle world" is one of the variations of Land where the lives of Roland. The guy behaves heroically, though, and is a small burden to Roland. The movie is 1.5 hours, and we began to forget what it is. Usually blockbusters are now 2 hours or more, and we are already used to this pace. But this timing does not allow the film to sagging in the dynamics. The narrative here is very dynamic and, at times, throws us abruptly from scene to scene. At first it's annoying and it feels like some kind of serial format. But you get used to it. Such dynamics is great for such a simple plot. We have a guy who is being chased by the villain, and a good shot trying to save him and kill the man in black. Everything is simple and without surprises. The series of books was large and there was always a continuation. This film though has the freedom to continue, a complete work. Of course, first and foremost it is perfect for fans of books that finally got really the end. The world of books is varied, but the film didn't show us many of its inhabitants, and in general, feel the lack of budget.

The movie "The Dark Tower " is not to be confused with the adaptation of another author. Though this film is not an adaptation of the books of the cycle, Stephen King felt here. In the books the dynamics a little, the film is completely dynamic. This is action movie in which the books of Stephen King was almost nothing left. Fans will not be happy, but for people who have not read the book the movie will make a good impression. Yes, Idris Elba is not Clint Eastwood, who Stephen King was inspired by when creating the image by hand but Idris played it well! Before watching the movie don’t have to read the book, which is good. But if you read the whole cycle, you will understand much more. Although, the audience and explain a lot. It is a dynamic, emotional film that will not let you get bored.
Expand
3 of 26 users found this helpful323
All this user's reviews
8
NoluucigAug 4, 2017
We read:
Dark tower
IT Dr. Son Radiance And then the film is like. The guys who put bad marks are guys who apparently have no idea what they're talking about. If something does not coincide with the book - they are dissatisfied. I'll remind
We read:
Dark tower
IT
Dr. Son
Radiance

And then the film is like. The guys who put bad marks are guys who apparently have no idea what they're talking about. If something does not coincide with the book - they are dissatisfied. I'll remind the little girl, who repeats almost every page: there are other worlds besides this. Hence, interpreting is still possible a little different.
For an unknowing viewer, the film will indeed be terrible.
To the knower is incomparable. The only nuance: the merged final battle. Just a break in the film. For this huge minus.
Expand
1 of 23 users found this helpful122
All this user's reviews
7
EludiumQ36Dec 14, 2017
Did NOT read the books, so not pre-influenced. The film started off with an interesting concept of the world being influenced by dire events in another dimension/world, which ever. But like all movies that feature super powers/abilities andDid NOT read the books, so not pre-influenced. The film started off with an interesting concept of the world being influenced by dire events in another dimension/world, which ever. But like all movies that feature super powers/abilities and unbridled magic, it's going to disappoint in the plausibility dept. Walter's demise was fairly clever though. On my Buy/Netflix/Skip scale, it's Netflix. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
ahwNov 4, 2017
Surprised the metascore is so low for this movie. Rented it from Redbox with 0 expectations based on critic reviews. This is not a 34/100 movie. Not great by any means, but competently written, acted, and directed.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
rjmacreadyApr 20, 2020
As someone who hasn't read the King books - and someone who gave up on Marvel movies several years ago - I have absolutely no idea why this film is so maligned in an era where the stock-standard superhero movie reigns so supreme. Nothing hereAs someone who hasn't read the King books - and someone who gave up on Marvel movies several years ago - I have absolutely no idea why this film is so maligned in an era where the stock-standard superhero movie reigns so supreme. Nothing here is terribly "new", but it's a successful mish-mash of various genres (mostly fantasy and Western) that does what a good blockbuster should: entertain. Furthermore, as someone who hasn't read the King books, I can't say I felt that anything was "missing"...but I guess it's inevitable that condensing eight beloved books into a single movie is gonna tick SOME people off.

As for claims that it's "incomprehensible" to newcomers: I'm pretty sure I understood every second of it, no problemo. It's fairly basic stuff, to be sure, but has enough flair to keep one easily engaged for a smidgen over ninety minutes. Methinks you people have gotten just a wee bit spoiled if you find this inadequate; especially given how indiscriminately you all rush off to catch the latest Marvel movie in the cinemas (several times a year, no less)! Oh: and McConaughey's delectable depiction of the villainous Man in Black is simply to die for, and well worth the price of admission alone.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
gxm143Nov 5, 2017
Wow,never listen to the critics again. I thought this was a tremendous film. Sometimes I find movies made from books are immediately panned because they don't measure up, which is a warning sign if you don't care because you haven't read theWow,never listen to the critics again. I thought this was a tremendous film. Sometimes I find movies made from books are immediately panned because they don't measure up, which is a warning sign if you don't care because you haven't read the novel or short stories. Anyways: solid performances, great visuals, original direction and a plot that keeps you engaged. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
eva3si0nNov 20, 2017
I will tell at once - I didn't read the books. Also I consider the Universe only on the basis of the movie. Yes it is not the best movie in 2017. Yes a plot at him very simple and the first half of the movie is very tightened. Characters areI will tell at once - I didn't read the books. Also I consider the Universe only on the basis of the movie. Yes it is not the best movie in 2017. Yes a plot at him very simple and the first half of the movie is very tightened. Characters are almost not revealed! It is the main failure of the movie. But 2 most favourite have acted in this movie me the actor therefore I can't soberly estimate the movie, but death of Man in Black looks too silly. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
ThaddeusDec 16, 2017
Best adaption from a book that I have seen in a long time. Matthew McConaughey was such a huge scene stealer. His southern accent was funny. As were his one liners. Idris Elba was good too. Hope they make more sequels.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
jota3cJul 15, 2020
I'm not sure why all the hate on this movie on the reviews. For me, a King fan that don't read (yet) the dark tower books (shame!), it was a good movie with good actors. It was a pity that the bad reviews killed what could be a interesting franchise
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
AgentFireAug 12, 2020
I absolutely loved it. I may be a bit cramped, but the actor play is fantastic, the actors are all cool and play their role wonderfully, action sequences are all how i imagine them to be - dynamic, short and with a couple of tide turns. II absolutely loved it. I may be a bit cramped, but the actor play is fantastic, the actors are all cool and play their role wonderfully, action sequences are all how i imagine them to be - dynamic, short and with a couple of tide turns. I really hope to see the sequels. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
AlexanderLuthorJan 11, 2018
Having read the books and The Dark Tower being perhaps my favorite story of all time, I admit I was disappointed with the direction they took in the film. That being said, as far as films go, it was a pretty fun ride with some interestingHaving read the books and The Dark Tower being perhaps my favorite story of all time, I admit I was disappointed with the direction they took in the film. That being said, as far as films go, it was a pretty fun ride with some interesting moments and I enjoyed the actors portraying both Roland and Jake. Worth the watch but don't get your hopes up. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RalfbergsJul 12, 2018
I thought it was interesting to watch and something new, but maybe that is just me and given that I have not read comics, maybe I dont know about any flaws etc, but for a regular movie goer it felt decent movie. I did not like how easy it wasI thought it was interesting to watch and something new, but maybe that is just me and given that I have not read comics, maybe I dont know about any flaws etc, but for a regular movie goer it felt decent movie. I did not like how easy it was dealt with some stuff and the kid just forgets how his mom was killed and is happy again at the end even though he lost his whole family etc and is just happy that he will be the gunslinger. Also it was quite predictable mostly, but still a fun watch. For those who have read the books or comics (not sure which), they probably dont like it because it is not true to the source or something I guess, but for casual viewer it was decent. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
teejeMar 12, 2018
The overall feel of this movie was like that of a teenage novel being transformed into a movie. Consequently viewers cannot grasp the full depth of the universe and the complexity of the characters. I believe that this film was negativelyThe overall feel of this movie was like that of a teenage novel being transformed into a movie. Consequently viewers cannot grasp the full depth of the universe and the complexity of the characters. I believe that this film was negatively received because casual movie-goers found it too hard to get into, whereas fans of the book series were disappointed that the film was 'Hollywoodized'. This was ultimately a good movie when viewed on its own. The acting was incredible, and the plot was, at minimum, intriguing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Polleke1970Sep 14, 2020
Looking at the many negative reviews I think we can conclude this movie has nothing to do with the books and this is turning off a lot of fans from this series. However out of frustration or disappointment then giving this movie a veryLooking at the many negative reviews I think we can conclude this movie has nothing to do with the books and this is turning off a lot of fans from this series. However out of frustration or disappointment then giving this movie a very negative review does not do it justice. When you can see this movie as a stand alone and look past the books this actually is a very entertaining movie. Idris Elba does a great job as Roland and Tom Taylor is doing potentially even better in my eyes. Overall I enjoyed this movie very much. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews