Warner Bros. | Release Date: April 19, 2019
4.5
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 140 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
25
Mixed:
66
Negative:
49
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
ayarlettApr 21, 2019
It wasn't that bad. Just your run of the mill horror movie with jump scares and a reasonably scary monster. 6 out of 10 for me.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
Daniel_EndureApr 19, 2019
Predictable? Yes. Entertaining, though? Also, yes. Everything about The Curse Of La Llorona screams "average." The acting is good only half the time, the script is good half the time (particularly with the horror thrills), and even thePredictable? Yes. Entertaining, though? Also, yes. Everything about The Curse Of La Llorona screams "average." The acting is good only half the time, the script is good half the time (particularly with the horror thrills), and even the cinematography goes from top-notch one moment to near trash the next. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
5
joeyabukiApr 19, 2019
VERY BAD this new installment of The Conjuring Universe. All the cliches of the genre, the weeping woman turns quickly and it breaks bones, that even shows up in the trailer when the child sees her, jump cheap scares and all the same oldVERY BAD this new installment of The Conjuring Universe. All the cliches of the genre, the weeping woman turns quickly and it breaks bones, that even shows up in the trailer when the child sees her, jump cheap scares and all the same old things that people of today like, like for example everything is silent, suddenly a loud sound and she appears behind you in the shadows. TOTALLY PREDICTABLE. When the girl looks out the door I already knew it was for her doll and voila, that was it. Everything is fortuitous. The stupid shaman that is trying to be funny, the kids behaving so foolish that everyone in the room wanted to punch them, people laughed and they were angry (but that's the script's fault). The other mexican crazy lady that becomes bad and vindictive in order to finish the others, and in the end is redeemed from one moment to another because the plot says. This movie is like a Mexican fast food in the USA that you find in a corner, which is not the REAL FOOD in Mexico. It has good things and I know that there are people who like this kind of cheap fear, and there were some who got scared in the room and even shouted and covered their faces.

SPOILER: In the end they kill La Llorona, that's like killing The Bogeyman, totally absurd, that's an urban legend in all Latin America, a folklore, a woman who lost her children and is walking around kidnapping others. You can't kill Baba Yaga.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
TheQuietGamerJun 8, 2021
By far the strangest entry in the Conjuring Universe. The only connection it shares with the other films in that world is a brief appearance from Tony Amendola as Father Perez, who you may remember from the first Annabelle. It's a fairlyBy far the strangest entry in the Conjuring Universe. The only connection it shares with the other films in that world is a brief appearance from Tony Amendola as Father Perez, who you may remember from the first Annabelle. It's a fairly insignificant tie-in however, as outside of that one small reference getting made it largely does its own self-contained thing. So if you're solely interested in watching this to ensure you don't miss out on any aspect of the bigger picture this web of interconnected horror is creating, rest assured this is an inconsequential piece of the puzzle that you won't regret skipping. Not least of all because it's not very good.

This could have been a great opportunity to bring a more diverse perspective to theaters due to its use of Latin American folklore and a primarily Hispanic cast. Unfortunately, that potential was squandered by the casting of a white woman in the lead role (showing once again that mainstream Hollywood flat out does not care about women of color) and failure to use the culture in any way to distinguish the movie from your average haunted house flick. So if this was an attempt to bring some representation to cinemas, it's a pretty miserable misstep on that front.

Of course it's also not very successful as a horror film either. The titular La Llorona is a particularly loathsome specter as a result of her fondness for drowning children, but Michael Chavez was unable to make her the slightest bit scary. All she ever does is predictably pop out screaming with her arms outstretched, yank people off-screen umpteen times, or simply stand in place and try to look creepy. None of which prove effective at getting the adrenaline going.

There's also a weird tonal shift about halfway through. The first portion plays out in a very serious and self-respecting manner. It's not exactly "good," but nowhere near as awful as its reputation would have you believe. When Raymond Cruz's character shows up however, things start to get a bit cheeky. A playful tone creeps its way in and you start noticing the appearance of jokes in what I can only assume was an effort to capture some of the campiness that made The Nun an unexpected blast. It got to the point where I literally turned to the person next to me and asked "when did this become a comedy?" The pacing does increase at this point, but just when it looks like it's about to go into high gear it instead abruptly ends as the ghost is defeated in an anticlimactic and unintentionally hilarious manner. It was at this point I realized just how bad and slapped together the whole experience is.

This was very clearly just a test run to get Chavez ready to direct the third Conjuring. Because of that it's understandable why Wan and crew were still willing to give him the reigns in spite of how rushed and sloppy this turned out. Unfortunately for us, they missed the fact that nothing he put onscreen was able to raise so much as a single goosebump. La Llorona is a fright-free mess that feels like each of its writers had different visions and instead of coming together split the script duties down the middle, never makes satisfying use of its shared universe ties, and fails to respectfully depict the culture it's borrowing from.

4.5/10
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
Davrosdaleks1Apr 20, 2019
La Llorona, based on the Mexican folktale about a ghost who drowns children, is about a seventies case worker (played by Linda Cardellini) trying to protect her children (played by Roman Christou and Jaynee-Lynn Kinchen) from the titularLa Llorona, based on the Mexican folktale about a ghost who drowns children, is about a seventies case worker (played by Linda Cardellini) trying to protect her children (played by Roman Christou and Jaynee-Lynn Kinchen) from the titular ghost (played by Marisol Ramirez). Though it picks up in the last act, this movie is rather dull.

Beginning exhibition is stilted. Most of the characters aren't interesting, including Cardellini's character and I usually like her work. This is a Conjuring-verse movie. The franchise has done a wonderful job with child characters and actors. Until now. When the horrible stuff starts happening, the kids are just so frustratingly unresponsive to the events around them for a good portion of the film. Only Tony Amendola as a priest has a lively performance and it's a bit part.

Movie isn't really scary. Frights are predictable and often uninteresting. La llorona is a very basic ghost character and there isn't much visually interesting about her. I do give credit to whoever worked on her dress. It shifts from white to dirty black really nicely. This is how much I was bored, I was noticing color gradients.

There are a few nice shots, but on a whole the cinematography is uninteresting, not to mention the lighting. This is director Michael Chaves' first feature film and it shows. It's not so much a case of being a bad director than an inexperienced one.

The reason I'm not giving this a lower rating is that the final act and confrontation with La Llorona is directed a little better and a little fun at times. Raymond Cruz shows up as a healer and he has the only funny lines in the film. His methods to deal with the ghost are kind of interesting including a fun scene involving eggs. There is a transition shot that stands out because it's the best in the film.

Overall in the Conjure-verse rankings, I'd put this above Annabelle and below the rest. If you're a franchise completionist, knock yourself out. I wouldn't say there is anything strong enough to deter you. As for everyone else, there are stronger horror films out there.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
JAKEJACOBJORDSep 22, 2021
GOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOOD
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
BrianMcCriticMay 11, 2019
To paint by numbers to recommend, even as there are moments that are pretty good. I wish this was a film that took more risks but an interesting tale quickly becomes a standard horror film. Overall a high 5 a C+.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Method__ManJun 20, 2021
Stereotypical horror stuff. Kids are unbearably stupid (the door and doll scene, for those who have watched).

I refuse to accept that any person is actually as stupid as in these movies. All that being said, horror movies are pretty much a
Stereotypical horror stuff. Kids are unbearably stupid (the door and doll scene, for those who have watched).

I refuse to accept that any person is actually as stupid as in these movies. All that being said, horror movies are pretty much a standard formula.

Plus sides however: acting was good, Raphael was really good and enjoyable. And some nice jump scares.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JPKJul 2, 2019
Pretty Boring
Considering this is set in The Conjuring Universe, I was pretty disappointed in this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Player2-WaterApr 20, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. E-Value: 5
Acting: 7
Plot: 4

Although marketed as a standalone movie, The Curse of La Llorona is actually the sixth instalment in The Conjuring Universe due to Tony Amendola reprising his role as Father Perez from 2014’s Annabelle and even at one point, mentioned about his experience with the haunted doll. This movie is also a unique instalment because La Llorona, which is an evil entity from Mexican folklore, does not have anything to do with the Warrens at all in real life.

Set in the year of 1973, Anna Garcia (Cardellini) is a social worker and a widow with two children, Chris and Samantha, living in Los Angeles. One day while working, she and the social service discover that Patricia Alvarez (Velásquez) locked up her two children in a closet which she claims that she done so to protect them from La Llorona (Ramirez).

Patricia’s children are taken from her by the social service while she is sent to jail for alleged child abuse. After her children mysteriously died in a river, Patricia blames Anna for her indirect role in her children’s death and she said La Llorona is responsible for the cause. At first, Anna does not believe until La Llorona set her sight on her next target: Anna’s beloved children.

To be honest, this movie is a little bit scary than the first Annabelle movie and 2018’s The Nun. At times, I got freaked out during some of the jump scares. The good thing about this movie is it is a little better than those two movies but still not good enough compared to the first two Conjuring and 2017’s Annabelle: Creation. Michael Chaves has done a good job as director in his directorial debut which kind of makes sense that why James Wan chose him to direct The Conjuring 3. Linda Cardellini’s acting is very good but her character does not have enough development and so does many other characters in the movie.

However, the plot of the movie is very underdeveloped. For example, the movie does not explain how Patricia Alvarez and her children were attached by La Llorona. How does a demonic entity from Mexico ended up in Los Angeles? It does not make sense. If Patricia and her children are from Mexico, it would have make sense that they were attached by the demon back in the old country but this is purely my speculation, not to be taken as an official lore. There was no explanation or any backstory at all to improve the plot. The only backstory in the movie is the basic history of La Llorona and that is about it.

Since Michael Chaves have been selected to direct The Conjuring 3, he definitely needs to step up his game by having better writers and focus on improving the plot, screenplay, script and character development otherwise that upcoming movie will suffer a sequelitis. Last but not least, this movie would probably be better off as a standalone movie instead of being part of The Conjuring Universe.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
milanklauiMay 18, 2019
Whilst the original Conjuring movies have the ability to spook you, this one is directionless and laughable, with the endless creaky doors and Sam actually flying out the front door as your best examples.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
DULAccdApr 19, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I cannot consider this as a horror movie. For me it was more like comedy. I gave it a 5 for the story. It is also to be said that you can predict every single jumpscare,but as I said, it is more like comedy, not horror. Overall, it is average. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
qbaseJun 7, 2019
Spin off της τρομο-μυθολογίας του «Καλέσματος», που σπάει ρεκόρ ρηχότητας διαλόγων, μονότονης πλοκής και μηχανιστικής αναπαραγωγής όλων των φτηνών, πιασάρικων κλισέ του είδουςSpin off της τρομο-μυθολογίας του «Καλέσματος», που σπάει ρεκόρ ρηχότητας διαλόγων, μονότονης πλοκής και μηχανιστικής αναπαραγωγής όλων των φτηνών, πιασάρικων κλισέ του είδους
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ShaneBMay 2, 2019
-I think this is just a movie to hold us over until the new Annabelle comes out, but:

The good: semi fresh folk lore type story(only because it’s of a Mexican origin, not many of those), still... not much diff than any other evil spirit lady
-I think this is just a movie to hold us over until the new Annabelle comes out, but:

The good: semi fresh folk lore type story(only because it’s of a Mexican origin, not many of those), still... not much diff than any other evil spirit lady that takes kids type of movie.
There was a verrry quick nod to the Annabelle franchise in the movie...

The bad: like I mentioned above, it’s your run of the mill , evil spirit lady in a dress coming for a family/single parents kids. I don’t know how connected this movie is to the Annabelle/conjuring/insidious universe aside from the 5 seconds of showing Annabel and the priest talking about getting help from “the church” (basically referring to the husband and wife team from the conjuring) but I guess we’ll see if they mention this “tale” in the new Annabelle. Don’t know if they can, this was set in the 70s and I THINK the new Annabelle is set in present day, not sure, doesn’t really matter... aaaaanywaay, 95% of all the times La Llorona appears on screen it’s a quick jump scare situation, real quick they never really keep going with the “terror” they had like multiple quick jump scares in a row, instead of just playing it all out. Kinda frustrating, but I guess they had to create as much tension as they could since the story isn’t that unique (most of the movie is cliche anyway)

Overall: all the kids were pretty good actors. The adults were standard as well. I saw this movie on a Thursday at 3pm, and this is the exact type of movie you’d watch at that time. It’s, just straight up: a movie that has things you’ve seen before, but this time the characters aren’t white.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
TomtagJun 1, 2019
One question before reviewing the movie: Is “The Curse of La Llorona” part of the Conjuring Universe? Maybe and maybe not, look at Rotten Tomatoes’ List of The Conjuring Universe and “The Curse o La Llorona” wasn’t there but I still think itOne question before reviewing the movie: Is “The Curse of La Llorona” part of the Conjuring Universe? Maybe and maybe not, look at Rotten Tomatoes’ List of The Conjuring Universe and “The Curse o La Llorona” wasn’t there but I still think it is because there’s James Wan (as a producer). And guess what, this movie FAILS! And here’re my opinions about it. Initially, the performances are good with Linda Cardellini as Anna Garcia and her two children, Sam and Chris and there’s a woman Patricia played by an actor with the same name. Their acting was the most impressive of the movie. They knew how to scream, how to weep but I wasn’t impressed much with the actor of La Llorona, she should be a lot scarier than how she was in the movie. I like the make-up of La Llorona, a grey face with black tears and yellow eyes, that’s a bit creepy. This movie definitely looks like a James Wan movie. James Wan had some horror masterpieces like Saw, The Conjuring and more. The cinematography, it was okay, how they shot was good, not disturbing or bad at all. I don’t know if they used that much special effects and then I looked at the budget, it’s $9 million, they wasted some. You know why this movie FAILS? It’s because how I measured the movie in the scare factor, from a scale from 1% to 100%, I would rate this movie 5% scary and that’s the problem with horror movies nowadays, they forgot to make the movie scary, all they did was adding blood here and there, it’s not scary and I wanted to see this in the theatre and then people made stupid decision to rate this R and it’s a waste, just like Hellboy. Even the jumpscares they had were over and over again but none of them worked. The whole movie is totally boring, almost every part of the movie is non-horror. The Conjuring Universe is going to be one of the best horror franchises but all it takes is one substandard spin-off to make you realize just how much craft and care are needed to make these things work right. I really don’t think there’s a reason for this movie to exist. It’s not scary or creepy, it’s just so annoying that I really want to give it a 1 or 0 but nah, good acting, good cinematography as well but still, the movie really FAILS. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CalebTheCriticMay 11, 2019
So I watched this moving thinking "it will be awesome" but it was a bit disappointing the acting was a bit bad as well. I did like the storyline though . would not recommend, ONLY to die hard horror film fans.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
PaulxavierfosteMay 22, 2019
Man könnte diesen Film auch " Jumpscare- compilation" nennen. Alle 5 min kommt gefühlt der nächste Jumpscare, woraus resultiert, dass der Film auf 90 min 16! Jumpscares hatte. Zum Vergleich: Ein Conjuring 2 hatte auf 134 min ca. 5-6Man könnte diesen Film auch " Jumpscare- compilation" nennen. Alle 5 min kommt gefühlt der nächste Jumpscare, woraus resultiert, dass der Film auf 90 min 16! Jumpscares hatte. Zum Vergleich: Ein Conjuring 2 hatte auf 134 min ca. 5-6 Jumpscares und ist einer der besten Horrorfilme. Warum ich trotzdem noch ne 5 gegeben habe? Weil das Monster sehr gut aussieht und die schauspielerischen Leistungen sind okay, sodass der Film genau die Mitte trifft. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
6PereiraNicolasJul 18, 2019
Add cheap, uncreative scares, with a spirit that only screams and does nothing, along with a story with stupid solutions that come out of nowhere, this is the definition of The Crurse of La Llorona.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JLauSep 18, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Social worker takes children away from their mother who was protecting them from a ghost trying to drown them so they get drowned and then that mother tries to give the social worker's children to the ghost. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JACOBJORDANBAJun 22, 2021
I watched the curse of the weeping woman a Mexican story to keep kids out of the water but I didn't like the movie James wan was better with the conjuring and stuff this piece of s*** movie
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
GiugiOct 3, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Horror movie quite cute and also scary at times as he knows how to make good use of various moments of anxiety. The plot is very simple and impactful although sometimes there are holes or very stupid parts that were sparable. The Llorona is aesthetically done well and scary, it's also cute that it brands people. The role of social workers, on the other hand, is wasted because it leads nowhere and they are useless for the purpose of the plot
Joker.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews