Read User Reviews and Submit your own for The Amazing Spider-Man

8

Burmun-B2010Aug 15, 2023

Honestly, I didn't expect much from this movie. Because the previous trilogy was officially a masterpiece and only the last part failed. But it went beyond my expectations. To be fair, it's a good movie, but it has some small flaws.
First:Honestly, I didn't expect much from this movie. Because the previous trilogy was officially a masterpiece and only the last part failed. But it went beyond my expectations. To be fair, it's a good movie, but it has some small flaws.
First: Spiderman's costume is one of the worst! Believe me, the handmade costume of the same work is much better, but this was bad in the sense of the word.
Second: After the second half, all the characters find depth and get better, including Rajit Rata, who disappears completely.
Third: The special effects for the lizard are not very strong. And his purpose for evil was a bit clichéd. But we can safely say that it was scary and created breathtaking battles.
Fourth: The conclusion is not very strong. That is, Peter Parker, as a person who has responsibility and promised to draw a line around Gwen, will forget his promise and his responsibility! And this is really bad.
The rest of the cases are in one word excellent. Andrew Garfield is really the best Spider-Man actor. Similarly, Emma Stone for Gwen Stacy. And their chemistry is also among the best. The action sequences are amazing and... did I miss something?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

BroyaxJan 8, 2017

J’ai l’impression que c’est le problème des films de super-héros issus des « comics » écrits par des simples d’esprit pour un jeune public simplet : il n’y a tout simplement pas assez de matière pour en tirer des films qui dépassent les deuxJ’ai l’impression que c’est le problème des films de super-héros issus des « comics » écrits par des simples d’esprit pour un jeune public simplet : il n’y a tout simplement pas assez de matière pour en tirer des films qui dépassent les deux putains de plombes.

Les effets spéciaux sont là, le pognon est là mais l’histoire ? ou plutôt une tentative d’ébauche de début d’histoire ? nan, y a que dalle. Dans ce cas, il aurait fallu se limiter à l’heure et demi syndicale voire 1h25, générique de 10 mn inclus. De quoi privilégier l’action spectaculaire comme ils savent (au moins) le faire… la plupart du temps.

Encore faudrait-il que ce soit filmé agréablement… à l’instar d’un Sucker Punch, trop long, trop con lui aussi mais au bon filmage (au moins !). Ce qui n’est pas du tout le cas ici avec cette réalisation un peu trop cut et zoomée pour être honnête.

Pour le reste, les acteurs sont aussi nuls que le pseudo-scénario, aussi bêtes et crétins qu’il est possible de l’être. Amazing ? oui, de ce point de vue, c’est amazingment con (pour parler franglais), super-con même ! et chiant comme la pluie aussi.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

wildest21May 3, 2023

Great story seems more like a cyber punk version of spider Man. More edgy the the original. But still a great story. I think a twist from Spidey 3 with the black suit kind of way. If that makes any sense.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CoreGamer1408Apr 18, 2023

Garfield is such a likeable actor for sure so maybe thats it? He is my personal draw for this movie and not this version Spider-man. I could watch Garfield all day for sure.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Jaidenbrkl1Apr 11, 2023

Probably the most underrated and darkest Spider Man movie of all time and it’s surprisingly entertaining enough because of a dark story, amazing pacing, and excellent writing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Fixer84Mar 15, 2023

Not the best Spider-Man movie, it seems to be a sort of half-remake of Raimi's first film, but it's well made.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

oneofjwNov 24, 2022

Its a really good start of a different Spider-man universe, some boring parts but damn it is good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

zeekynSep 24, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. НУ МОЙ ЛЮБИМЫЙ ФИЛЬМ ПЕРЕСМАТРИВАЮ РАЗ ГОД ГАРФИЛД ЛУЧШИЙ АКТЁР ФИЛЬМ ШЕДЕВР
ОТНОШЕНИЯ С ГВЕН ВЕЛИКОЛЕПНЫ В КОНЦЕ ВСЕГДА ПЛАЧУ, ну ладно иногда плачу всегда ток на 2 части
смерть дяди Бена вот тут плачу слезка прям кап-кап небо осень кап-кап развитие Питера шедеврально ну он умнее меня буквально
Курт Коннорс дура конечно ну ладно добрым стал в конце интересно а его в тюрьму посадили или он дальше умничает, жаль капитана Стейси
ну тут фильм кстати на части поделен типо как K I N E M A T O G R A F, вот паука Гарфилда бы в КВМ буквально на постоянку . Фильм УЧП УЧП потому что УДИВИТЕЛЬНЫЙ. Саунд в фильме ВЕЛИКО ВЕЛИКО… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

PlatinumTrophyAug 29, 2022

This is like a made for kids made for TV movie. Nothing like the OG Spider-Man with Tobey Maguire. Got it for $5.99. Still not worth it at that price. A very unlikeable actor playing as Spider-Man. And Emma Stone is nothing to write homeThis is like a made for kids made for TV movie. Nothing like the OG Spider-Man with Tobey Maguire. Got it for $5.99. Still not worth it at that price. A very unlikeable actor playing as Spider-Man. And Emma Stone is nothing to write home about either. Terrible movie not even worth a rental. We didn't even want to finish it. There was only one scene that was slightly watchable where "Spider-Man" was in the car about to be stolen. 1 scene out of the entire movie. They should never hire this actor again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Itzach2005Aug 25, 2022

O melhor filme do Homem-Aranha (perde apenas para Aranhaverso).
É um filme espetacular e sensacional, um roteiro fenomenal de tão bem desenvolvido, bem planejado composto por emoção e ação de primeira e ainda temos um elenco maravilhoso,O melhor filme do Homem-Aranha (perde apenas para Aranhaverso).
É um filme espetacular e sensacional, um roteiro fenomenal de tão bem desenvolvido, bem planejado composto por emoção e ação de primeira e ainda temos um elenco maravilhoso, caracterização nova e linda, atuações excelentes, uma magnífica jornada do herói e relações entre personagens muito bem estabelecidas, e com certeza, estaria no meu Top 10 filmes de heróis de todos os Tempos.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

tellmikeyyJul 27, 2022

Andrew Garfield delivers one of the best portrayals of Spider-Man but not the best version of Peter Parker. Wasn’t the biggest fan of his shy-can’t finish words- lines but his intelligence, wit & charm worked well. Movie didn’t really flow atAndrew Garfield delivers one of the best portrayals of Spider-Man but not the best version of Peter Parker. Wasn’t the biggest fan of his shy-can’t finish words- lines but his intelligence, wit & charm worked well. Movie didn’t really flow at times & there are certain personalities and plot points I would have done differently. Fighting sequences are great, score is good, Gwen/Peter dynamic is iconic & Lizard is pretty decent as the villain.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

Rickniks38May 8, 2022

Don't like the film the story and writing are super hit or miss everything else though is good Andrew Garfield plays Spider-Man well and I like the romance between him and Gwen.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

KelvinSelimorApr 24, 2022

The Amazing Spider-Man. He is new and modern. Andrew Garfield coped with the role of a spider. It does not look like a Tobey Maguire spider, and that's good. A more dynamic and more teenage film gave a great start for the new Spider-Man series.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

Banjo_ReviewieDec 20, 2021

This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen, it's just a copy paste of the first Spider-Man movie with no substance.
truly awful.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

NobuFLMar 19, 2022

Amazing movie :) asodisidjdoaidjoaidjaoidjioadjsaoidjaosdijaosidjaoscijosac

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

kyle20ellisMar 17, 2022

That said though, from personal opinion The Amazing Spider-Man was not a bad film, or at least nowhere near as bad as has been said(again personal opinion), but it doesn't live up to its name. For me, the first two Sam Raimi Spider-Man filmsThat said though, from personal opinion The Amazing Spider-Man was not a bad film, or at least nowhere near as bad as has been said(again personal opinion), but it doesn't live up to its name. For me, the first two Sam Raimi Spider-Man films are better, and while Spider-Man did plod and had too many villains all but one of which were underused personally it wasn't that bad. The Amazing Spider-Man did have things to like, it is very stylishly made and has some very impressive special effects, even if the Lizard takes some getting used to. The action sequences- of which there are a lot in the second half- mostly are exciting with some cool stunts(the one exception is the climax which seemed like it was played and written too safe) and very creative use of Spider-Man's powers, and there are some parts in the story that work, the dynamic between Peter and Uncle Ben is really quite emotionally powerful, the romance between Peter and Gwen is somewhat sweet and the part where Spider-Man saves the little boy is tense and heart-felt. It was also very intriguing with the mystery of Peter's parents which was done quite well. The performances on the whole are also good, Sally Field and especially Martin Sheen are great as Aunt May and Uncle Ben, and Emma Stone is a charming and amusing Gwen. Rhys Ifans does bring some creepiness to Curt Connors/The Lizard if not the tragedy(the writing didn't help him though) and Denis Leary is delightful in how churlish he is. On the whole too there is some good chemistry between the actors. I never really warmed to Andrew Garfield though, he did seem too quirky for Peter complete with some forced humour and wasn't enough of a nerd, he wasn't a whole lot better as Spider-Man either, he had charisma but did come across as rather smug and not brooding enough for such a serious tone to the story here. Irrfan Kahn's performance and his character is little more than an extended cameo, not very much to work with and Kahn does little with it. The story does have its fair share of well-done moments but does suffer from an over-familiarity that feels like a more seriously toned rehash and uneven pacing, sluggish in the first half and while much better rushed in some of the second half. The script is never terrible nor is it ever exceptional, there are sweet and emotional moments as well as tense ones but too much of the humour is forced and it interferes with the serious tone. James Horner's score is nowhere near among his best, some of it pedestrian, some of it over-the-top, neither of which Danny Elfman's scoring had. And the film really rushed Connors'/Lizard's character arc, there was real potential for him to be a multi-layered character but here he came across as a one-dimensional villain with no real motivation. Overall, watchable but not close to being amazing. 5.5/10 Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DarkwingSchmuckMar 12, 2022

This watchable, but ultimately misguided reboot of Spider-Man chooses to remake Sam Raimi's original film with the tone and style of Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins. However, Spider-Man is not Batman, and this more realistic, melodramaticThis watchable, but ultimately misguided reboot of Spider-Man chooses to remake Sam Raimi's original film with the tone and style of Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins. However, Spider-Man is not Batman, and this more realistic, melodramatic tone clashes terribly when there's a giant green lizard-man on screen. Still, its two leads do share some strong chemistry, even if Andrew Garfield doesn't quite measure up as everyone's favorite friendly neighborhood Spider-Man.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

mikesgold2KFeb 8, 2022

nie jest taki najgorszy jaki ludzie opowiadają, błyszczy na polu relacji Petera i Gwen, szkoda, że złoczyńca nie trzyma już takiego poziomu i dobrych motywacji

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

KayVen17Jan 11, 2022

Damals konnte ich ihn nicht leiden. Ich wollte krampfhaft Tobey zurück. Trotzdem bin ich nach wie vor positiv überrascht. Er hat zwar Sachen die mir sauer aufstoßen. Zum Beispiel gefällt mir trotz guten Martin Sheen die Darstellung von OnkelDamals konnte ich ihn nicht leiden. Ich wollte krampfhaft Tobey zurück. Trotzdem bin ich nach wie vor positiv überrascht. Er hat zwar Sachen die mir sauer aufstoßen. Zum Beispiel gefällt mir trotz guten Martin Sheen die Darstellung von Onkel Ben nicht. Auch die Erzählung der Eltern ist nicht so mein Geschmack. Klar gibt es Comic-Handlungen mit dieser Interpretation der Eltern. Trotzdem gefallen sie mir auch da nicht.

Trotzdem ist die Chemie zwischen Emma Stone und Garfield super. Leider finde ich Garfield als Peter zu "cool". Hört sich seltsam an, aber da gefällt mir die verpeilte Art von Tobey besser.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021

----------------------------------6.3/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DubtrayDec 17, 2021

Cool interpretation of Spider-Man. Story keeps you engaged and interessted enough to care. Feels a bit more youthful than the original interpretation but more mature than the MCU-version. Some good actor performances. Solid superhero movieCool interpretation of Spider-Man. Story keeps you engaged and interessted enough to care. Feels a bit more youthful than the original interpretation but more mature than the MCU-version. Some good actor performances. Solid superhero movie with some storyflaws.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

ChanekeCholoDec 13, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The first half was so uncomfortable to watch and it lack a lot of development to that iconic moments of Spider-Man. The second half was a little bit good, it has a couple of good scene, like the scene in the rooftop with Gwen, the fight in the school and when the command officer take his mask off, and that's it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RS92Dec 4, 2021

Una buona ripartenza di brand.

The Amazing Spider-Man è un ottimo film, pacato nei modi, tranquillo ma soddisfacente. Lizard mi è piaciuto molto.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BullyMaguireDec 2, 2021

I still like this movie as there are some genuinely really great things about the movie such as the acting and the music as well as the action scenes. First off Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy is much better than Kirsten as MJ. And Andrew GarfieldI still like this movie as there are some genuinely really great things about the movie such as the acting and the music as well as the action scenes. First off Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy is much better than Kirsten as MJ. And Andrew Garfield as Spiderman I thought was good as acting-wise he does a better job than Tobey and he does get the character of both Peter Parker and Spiderman (although Tobey is still the best Peter Parker). But overall the plot was kind of mediocre the I was not a fan of the dark tone, and the Lizard while cool was kind of a boring villain. the movie also isn't very rewatchable in my opinion as there just not as fun as the Raimi movies.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

jastineNov 30, 2021

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Gorbunov2004Nov 29, 2021

Как по мне отличный перезапуск и Эндрю Гарфилд лучший человек паук.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

chromateNov 28, 2021

I never believed myself to be someone who could actually enjoy an action film dazzled with loud fight scenes, starred superheroes and evil villains, but The Amazing Spider-man proved me wrong. I don't find that this take on Spider-man wasI never believed myself to be someone who could actually enjoy an action film dazzled with loud fight scenes, starred superheroes and evil villains, but The Amazing Spider-man proved me wrong. I don't find that this take on Spider-man was extremely creative or new, but it's refreshing to watch a simple story of a hero, something that I assume Stan Lee was aiming for with his original comics. It's much more entertaining because of its simplicity, contrast to the Marvel adaptations where they pack as many powerful characters and well known actors in as they can. It didn't feel like I was sitting at the edge of my seat, but that's not what I was looking for. In the end, it left me satisfied, which is everything that an audience member could ask for. One of the main critiques of Andrew Garfield's Spider-man was that he was simply too cool to be an accurate Peter Parker. However, I appreciated the new confidence that Parker's character was revamped with, as it made the whole movie feel calmer, like you knew it would end up okay. It is important to note that this aspect isn't what some people are looking for though. Speaking of the actors, Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone were what made the whole feel alive and electric, their on-screen chemistry unmatched.

I will admit, a Spider-man reboot only 5 years after the Tobey Maguire's Spider-man trilogy ended does seem a bit rushed. (To be fair, the Marvel reboot was pushed out only 3 years after The Amazing Spider-man 2 was released.) Because of this, the writers and directors of this movie should have gone into it knowing the standard that it would be held up to. To be fair, seems like a lose-lose: if they take a new route the audience will hate how untraditional the story-line is (ex: Peter Parker not being a complete nerd). If they follow that same path, people will think it's a cheaper version of a childhood classic. But, when you take this film out of the context of all different Spider-man films, it's a good movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

HeraldozkaNov 25, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Filme incrível manteve minha atenção do inicio ao fim, adorei a atuação do garfield adorei a atuação do casal, já assisti aos dois filmes e digo que é o meu aranha favorito de longe, o garfield é incrível o universo ficou bem gostoso de se assistir, senti uma vibe muito boa vinda dele mesmo com muitas partes desleixadas nos dois filmes que se tornam irrelevantes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ValBalNov 21, 2021

Decided to rewatch it before "No way home". I think Garfield does a good job at portraying a teenager but most actors look too old to be high schoolers and sometimes I just found myself not fully believing the struggles that these kids wereDecided to rewatch it before "No way home". I think Garfield does a good job at portraying a teenager but most actors look too old to be high schoolers and sometimes I just found myself not fully believing the struggles that these kids were going through because of that. Other than that Garfield sells an idea of a science genius skateboarder who looks cool and acts cool. Not so much of a nerdy loser but it's okay, this is a different version. I didn't like how they show Uncle Ben's death but then it's never mentioned after that although the effect of what that death meant can be felt in Peter's responsibility to save people of his city. Not a huge fan of the lizard's design and his plan also felt pretty generic and dumb. Spider-man action was great. Dynamic, fun and heroic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

akshatmahajanNov 16, 2021

I skipped The Amazing Spider-man franchise due to so much negative reviews from fans but then decided to give it a try. Actually, I liked the movie. It was fun to watch except that it's execution was not that much solid. Overall, it was funI skipped The Amazing Spider-man franchise due to so much negative reviews from fans but then decided to give it a try. Actually, I liked the movie. It was fun to watch except that it's execution was not that much solid. Overall, it was fun to watch and if you don't compare it with the original trilogy, you will enjoy it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

RanGom007Nov 12, 2021

Mark Webb's dilogy showed what an amazing spider-Man is. Almost 10 years have passed, and these films still remain the best incarnations of the great hero in cinema. Sony please bring Andrew Garfield back to the role of the friendly neighbor!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

arissacostaodonOct 27, 2021

Joder que buena película.
..................................................

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

HeroicAge616Oct 26, 2021

The Amazing Spider-Man offers a promising slate of ideas for Andrew Garfield's tenure as the character, smartly offering a take completely fresh from what came before.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Ascended333Oct 25, 2021

None of this is new to us, but Garfield and Webb make it feel convincingly fresh

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

FloroOct 17, 2021

The plot is very mediocre and the last hour is very rushed. The film is not really a good origin story but it does have some redeeming such as Peter's arc and the soundtrack. It is a good movie to watch once but never again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

ty92Sep 25, 2021

This movie was incredible in 3D watching it on my PSVR. It's now my second favourite Spider-Man movie. It's a must own on 3D Blu-ray.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JAKEJACOBJORDSep 22, 2021

GOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOOD

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Josephgamers65Sep 16, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Amazing Spiderman is my third fav Spiderman movie in the entire series here we have Andrew Garfield playing Peter Park and Spiderman because of the problem they had with spider-man 3 of course sony was the problem what is so messed up they did twice with the amazing spiderman 2 but anyway let's talk about this film one of my fav superhero movies also I think peter in this is good but not enough tho it's still good of course he does not look nerdy which people don't like again Andrew Garfield is a great movie to me he is my second fav spiderman out of the whole series by far ok Gwen she is by far my fav love interest for peter in the entire series the chemistry is amazing with them too Marc Webb knows how to make the characters feel natural like real people, not people just being on set The Lizard in this movie I do like but here is my one problem not a clear motive for the Lizard is the arm but then his boss said no and he started ejecting him self with the serum to make him transform into the Lizzard Mom and Dad story was way to short what I don't like sony marked this movie as a dark story for peter well guess what once again that did not happen but it was fine nothing crazy also this Capt Stancy is awesome in this one of my fav characters in this film his character is great protecting people even though he took a big risk in this film well lucky he did what was the right thing to make the Lizard not win also Ben in this I do like tho chemistry with this is pretty awesome the original ben from the trilogy is better but I do really like Chemistry in this tho another wow the score is pretty awesome not better than the trilogy but this pretty good like that about these two movies also all round one of my fav superhero movies could of been better for the villain if it had a motive but still a great movie super underrated so I give The Amazing Spider-Man an B+… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

LordLDSep 5, 2021

The film is not bad, I see many say that the script has some broken ones, but the character is very well built, I felt how much weight it is, which is demonstrated throughout the film, the couple of Gwen and Peter is wonderful. But......theThe film is not bad, I see many say that the script has some broken ones, but the character is very well built, I felt how much weight it is, which is demonstrated throughout the film, the couple of Gwen and Peter is wonderful. But......the film is approved!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

LasalAug 31, 2021

This was really a great movie!! And Andrew Garfield portrayed spiderman in the best way

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

hyunwest123Jul 8, 2021

andrew garfield and emma stone are amazing in it. this is the most spiderman-like adaptation that stays true to the original comics, and doesn’t make spiderman look stupid like they did in tobey mcguire’s or the mcu version. spiderman shouldandrew garfield and emma stone are amazing in it. this is the most spiderman-like adaptation that stays true to the original comics, and doesn’t make spiderman look stupid like they did in tobey mcguire’s or the mcu version. spiderman should be very smart and strategic, and also very spider-like in his movement. TASM got this down the best, hands down. it makes me love and support the film more since it is so criticized and hated by some people, calling it the “worst spiderman installment”. im sure a lot of people feel the same way as me that this is the best one. we just don’t go around looking for fights online.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

ReggytheWiseApr 26, 2021

whoever reviewed this higher then ant man, x-men, or spider-man 3 were either drunk or high because I don't remember the comic where peter was a thief like in this waste of time

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MrPajamasSep 26, 2020

Amazing Spider-Man is a reboot of the series and surprisingly quite hilarious, although Andrew Garfield didn't do nearly as good a job here as Tobey Maguire. The story is good and the negative is beautifully crafted in terms of CGI. I'm notAmazing Spider-Man is a reboot of the series and surprisingly quite hilarious, although Andrew Garfield didn't do nearly as good a job here as Tobey Maguire. The story is good and the negative is beautifully crafted in terms of CGI. I'm not going to lie that I'd rather this never came about and I'd rather be for Raider's Spider-Man 4, but otherwise it's a good movie that I can recommend.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

pur__0_0__Apr 6, 2021

I'm gonna be absolutely clear with this one - I absolutely love this interpretation of Spider-Man, except for the fact that he occasionally doesn't act like him. And I really wanted to like this movie. I played its game and it was really fun.I'm gonna be absolutely clear with this one - I absolutely love this interpretation of Spider-Man, except for the fact that he occasionally doesn't act like him. And I really wanted to like this movie. I played its game and it was really fun. But the movie, well, let's just say it had a lot of potential.

Finally Peter Parker is shown to always have a passion for photography. He's beaten up for not taking a picture of a bully bothering a schoolmate. If I were him I'd have taken a picture and shown it to the Principal and gotten that bully suspended, but let's assume this Peter Parker isn't as bright. Later he visits Oscorp, gets bitten by the spider and becomes Spider-Man.

I really like how they showed Spider-Man slowly turning into Spider-Man. In the beginning he is unable to understand why he has all these powers, then he starts seeing everything is sticking to him and he reacts on his own. Afterwards he is upgrading his suit accordingly to suit the needs. He makes his own device to shoot webs. The Sam Raimi trilogy had convinced anyone who didn't read the comics that Spider-Man's webs come out of his body, but it's not true. This movie clarified it.

The main antagonist of this movie is Lizard. As someone who has read the original The Amazing Spider-Man comic where Spider-Man encounters Lizard for the first time, I can guarantee you that that story should have been used here. It was way better than the "Spider-Man finds enemy in the gutter" plot. In the comic he goes to the jungles in Florida and finds Dr Curt Connor's family over there. Also originally Dr Connors used to DRINK the medicine to become Lizard, not inject it. I don't see why he'd choose to go by the more painful method.

And of course Uncle Ben dies. But unlike Spider-Man he didn't die in a climactic moment. He just died of his own stupidity. And later on no one gives a damn about his death. It doesn't make any difference at all.

The Amazing Spider-Man is an underexplored idea that should have been using a lot more stories than it did. Rather than entire squishing everything in the sequel, this should have added one more concept from the sequel, more preferably establishing that Peter and Harry were friends. That would have given content to this movie and made the sequel more convincing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Kelvin_Mar 17, 2021

Ótimo filme,Andrew Garfield é um ator sensacional,pra mim o melhor Homem Aranha.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Sarian263Mar 15, 2021

Looking back at this movie, There's just some things here which compared to what came before it and what has come since, makes you wonder just why this movie and its sequel was ever made. Don't get me wrong, it isn't all bad. Andrew GarfieldLooking back at this movie, There's just some things here which compared to what came before it and what has come since, makes you wonder just why this movie and its sequel was ever made. Don't get me wrong, it isn't all bad. Andrew Garfield I personally felt was a good Peter Parker/Spider-Man and the story wasn't bad. This Spider-Man movie felt more like a comic book movie than maybe what the previous trilogy in the series had done. And I am all for that. But comparing it now to what we have gotten since this movie came out and looking back at what came before hand, makes me wonder why this movie even exists. If your really curious and want to see some new enemies from the classic comics then by all means give it a go, but it isn't a movie I would personally watch again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Mar3148VMar 14, 2021

Ludicrous. What a waste of amazing talent.

Except Tony Perkins Junior as the Human Spider.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TRANSFORMERSFANMar 12, 2021

one of the best movies from 2012 along with brave, madagascar 3, the avengers, and wreck it ralph!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

PhoenixReveiwsMar 9, 2021

This movie is better than people give it credit for. It isn't as good as sam raimi's spiderman 1 and 2 along with the MCU's spiderman. But it's better than sam raimi's spiderman 3. It is good, but it does get forgotten by others. With funThis movie is better than people give it credit for. It isn't as good as sam raimi's spiderman 1 and 2 along with the MCU's spiderman. But it's better than sam raimi's spiderman 3. It is good, but it does get forgotten by others. With fun moment this is an enjoyable film that I do have fun watching from time to time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

RianJohnson15Feb 15, 2021

It feels like an excuse for Sony to secretly grab more money. We don't need to make the Raimi trilogy all over again in a very dark and edgy way. The execution is bad and the villain motivation is ridiculous.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

5

DCosloff1999Jan 24, 2021

I didn't like this reboot I really had a hard time moving on from the Raimi Trilogy. To me, Peter's arc was Great Power No Responsibility There are a few things in there that feels unearned. I do love Gwen Stacy and Flash Thompson in thisI didn't like this reboot I really had a hard time moving on from the Raimi Trilogy. To me, Peter's arc was Great Power No Responsibility There are a few things in there that feels unearned. I do love Gwen Stacy and Flash Thompson in this movie. Flash Thompson was a real character in this movie than just a bully. I really do love the lizard he was terrifying. I hated the suit. To this day I can't let that feeling go. It's not comicbook accurate. I think they should've used Ultimate Spider-Man as the source material.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

geewahJan 11, 2021

Garfield isn't a bad Spider-Man and most of action scenes are great, it's just that we all by now know the origin story pretty well

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

Onlyclassicvg1Dec 30, 2020

Fantastic movie! It kept my attention from beginning to end, which is hard to do for a movie that is over 2 hours long! The story was the best ever for Spider-Man, and everything was easy to understand and follow. Intense action sequences…

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

noob328Dec 8, 2020

it's not far from being the worst spider-man movie, it's just a remake of spider-man 2002 with better effects but worse story

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

1

Xolt3cNov 18, 2020

The Amazing Spider-Man is more of an excuse for Sony to keep the rights to the character than an actual movie. It’s only a remake of Raimi’s Spiderman trilogy. We had already seen the origin story done as well as it could be. There was noThe Amazing Spider-Man is more of an excuse for Sony to keep the rights to the character than an actual movie. It’s only a remake of Raimi’s Spiderman trilogy. We had already seen the origin story done as well as it could be. There was no reason to do it all over again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Cementer200Sep 22, 2020

I liked The Amazing Spider-Man. it is a good reboot of spider-man. the story is your usual spider-man origin story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Dovakinxr7Aug 21, 2020

O filme tem bons efeitos especiais,romance do filme é bom, tia may é a melhor que eu já vi dos filmes do Homem-Aranha.
O filme falha no Homem-Aranha que está descolado demais(skatetista e tudo mais) e o roteiro achei bem abaixo do esperado.O filme tem bons efeitos especiais,romance do filme é bom, tia may é a melhor que eu já vi dos filmes do Homem-Aranha.
O filme falha no Homem-Aranha que está descolado demais(skatetista e tudo mais) e o roteiro achei bem abaixo do esperado.
Basicamente o filme todo é bem mediano sabe? Nada de UAU e nem de TERRÍVEL...Fiquei meio decepcionado, mas seria mentira dizer que o filme é ruim, ele apenas foi abaixo do esperado.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

PanchogulJul 2, 2020

No tendrá el carisma de las primeras películas del hombre araña, pero esta nueva visión se siente más elocuente y madura. Andrew Garfield es el Spider Man mas parejo y equilibrado a mi parecer, no es tan nerd ni llorón como el de TobeyNo tendrá el carisma de las primeras películas del hombre araña, pero esta nueva visión se siente más elocuente y madura. Andrew Garfield es el Spider Man mas parejo y equilibrado a mi parecer, no es tan nerd ni llorón como el de Tobey Macguire ni tampoco es netamente dependiente y pendejo como el te Tom Holland.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

coolwaliJun 23, 2020

A susprinsgly heartfelt movie that plays to a more comic-book Spider-Man. Garfield and Stone's chemistry and charm steal the show

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

ShkvyapotapokJun 19, 2020

There is no development of the protagonist, events do not affect him at all, he is an egoist, he thinks only of himself, his girlfriend is a dummy, not a character, he’s just a doll that is needed only for the plot to work. Development inThere is no development of the protagonist, events do not affect him at all, he is an egoist, he thinks only of himself, his girlfriend is a dummy, not a character, he’s just a doll that is needed only for the plot to work. Development in terms of how the character develops. Regardless of who he is or whether his fans know, the character must always develop. Based on the events that occurred earlier - the character must come to some conclusions, conclusions and other things. Garfield Spider does not. And this is the main minus of the whole film. It is essentially useless.

All events did not teach the hero anything. Any film should teach the protagonist something. In our case, this is responsibility. It is clear that no one would repeat the ending of the film Raimi. But one could dodge. One way or another, the hero must come to something in the end. As I understand it, they were planning to teach Parker responsibility in the second part. But this is a bad decision, because it completely depreciates the entire first film, because, as I said earlier, the character has not learned anything, therefore this film is not needed. It turns out that the first film was wasted.

The film did not go to me because of the ending. Because she depreciates everything that happened in the film before her. The hero did not learn anything, the events of the film went to nothing, both for him and the viewer. That's all. The film itself, to the end, is not bad. The ending spoils everything.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

hunterdabossApr 19, 2020

anyone who hates this film is just being a whiny little dog. great action, story, and characters

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

10

JACK15qApr 5, 2020

Amazing movie. Good acting and story telling. Amazing ending. It had my attention from begging to end.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

alejandro970Apr 2, 2020

Well meaning reboot of the spider saga that Sam Raimi left behind. Andrew Garfield cast as well a Peter Parker closer to conceived by Steve Ditko, outcast, friendless. The sequence actions works fine, the hard lesson of power andWell meaning reboot of the spider saga that Sam Raimi left behind. Andrew Garfield cast as well a Peter Parker closer to conceived by Steve Ditko, outcast, friendless. The sequence actions works fine, the hard lesson of power and responsibility is it's right place. So bad for the loose ends, but finally Garfield deserved a chance.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

foss1kDec 6, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Actor selection is awful. I mean no offense but in original trilogy Peter looked like real loser and his future girlfriend was really nice, all seemed real and emotional. Here what can i see? Some Justin Bieber is main character playing role of guy who is clever scientifisist and loser. And most annoying, choosing among all beautiflul and pretty girls author decided to pic the most ugly for him.. ANY of them is better and prettier! Also, I hate the point of appearing spider-man's web is artifficial. In original trilogy it was natural and It looked cool like really his DNA changed partly with spiders. Since when his girlfriend clever than he is? one i liked is his first reaction for new abilities and stunning, it was made better, while original Peter's behaviour was like it was normal things. About minuses. Previous Peter was wearing galasses because he could not see withouth, in Amazing Spider Man Peter wearing it just for style, he keeps wearing it even when he's got an abilities. Now it's not fixing eyes problems? He doesnt look ugly or feel unconfidence, he takes whatever he wants and his future girfriend looking for opportunities to talk to him when is not interested in it. It is completely reversive part of original Spider-man, but with the same idea. First time I can see spider man who's escaping the fight he began... with no mask face to face. Peter like an idiot with emotions having conversation with father-cop and father-cop like an psycopath screaming to him seating next to him at the table, btw his girfriend invites him to dineer just from scratch and he meets her family where he let her know he's spider man.. fuuuuuuu. If I were 10 yo I 'd like all this but now I can see **** moments in products and believe me this is not all I've seen. Many of them I did not say here. Even stupid one would not guess Peter is spider man who comes at home like boxing bag. One I liked more is his decision keep meeting with mary jane after her father's death and despite his promise to him. you can say whatever you want but i see it like normal. that's why I put 1. because there's only one phrase I liked most - the last one before film end. And I cant see the sense to review second part because next text will get half of this one, and I dont like to write same reviews.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoNov 8, 2019

Visually grand, with great CGI and sound effects, great soundtrack and costumes ... but there's a lot of work to do in everything else.

Following in the wake of the ream of comic book heroes that DC and Marvel have been promoting, this filmVisually grand, with great CGI and sound effects, great soundtrack and costumes ... but there's a lot of work to do in everything else.

Following in the wake of the ream of comic book heroes that DC and Marvel have been promoting, this film is just one more, and addresses, as it has been done before in the cinema, the iconic figure of Spider-Man, a one of the most remarkable and famous cartoon heroes ever. It has spawned at least one trilogy (around 2000) and has now been recycled to make a few more movies and a few million dollars in profits.

This movie, like many others, tells how teenager Peter Parker became Spider-Man, with all the moral and psychological conflicts associated with such a radical transformation. However, we have seen this so many times that it was difficult to show anything substantially better without changing the character's story, which would be sacrilegious. So the movie just shows what we already know and finally selects a powerful villain from the long list of enemies the character has accumulated over decades of comics, and gives us the decisive confrontation between them.

Andrew Garfield is a decent Peter Parker, but I confess he hasn't always convinced me. He has some annoying face movements, but he does what he needs to do. Emma Stone looked a lot better to me as an actress, but of course this wasn't the movie for her to shine. So he just made a good romantic match, having a good chemistry with Garfield. Rhys Ifans is equally good as a villain. Martin Sheen and Denis Leary also did well.

The film is directed by Marc Webb, who did not know, but who seems to have done a decent job. The problem is that you didn't bet as much as you should on creating a good story and developing the characters and the work of the actors. The concern was, from the beginning, the CGI and the visual and sound effects. And in fact, in this respect the movie is truly excellent. It's a visual show from start to finish, with sweeping New York views, great costumes and photography, and immense camera movement, which gives a feeling of speed and agility to Spider-Man, who flies and jumps like never before. before in the cinema. The soundtrack is also excellent, as epic as you'd expect in such a movie.

I think the movie loses a little compared to other movies with other characters. It is not a movie that stays in memory or can be said to be grand or excellent. Good dialogues are missing, a handful of more complex and developed characters, a more interesting and less trite story. It's a good and entertaining movie, has good production values, good actors and is visually spectacular, but that's basically it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

park3rOct 29, 2019

filme tesudo do krl, tem vilao meio ruim mais o andrew mandou o papo jogando o fino

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

senbladeOct 12, 2019

Лучшее воплощение паучка в кино, - восхитительное, шедевральное и неповторимое. Эндрю Гарфилд великолепно вжился в роль, представив публике глубокого и объемного персонажа.Лучшее воплощение паучка в кино, - восхитительное, шедевральное и неповторимое. Эндрю Гарфилд великолепно вжился в роль, представив публике глубокого и объемного персонажа.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MurphyBrandonSep 15, 2019

The movie is not completely terrible, but Tobey Maguire and Tom Holland are both better as Spiderman than Andrew Garfield.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

robertoiglesiasSep 1, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Please do not hate me for saying this, but this is my favorite Spider-Man film.
I love the cast, especially Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone with their awesome chemistry. The Lizard is an interesting character and villain to me. His character has a special relationship to Peter's backstory parents that disappeared, which makes him stand out to me. This film has great action scenes and is backed up with a nice supporting cast.
So this film has my favorite Spider-Man, favorite love interest, and favorite villain. It brings back the important elements from the first film, and creates a new story along the way. It doesn't have my favorite action scenes, because its sequel does those in an excellent way to me. But I can safely say, this is amazing.

I just wished the sequel was better… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

4

rubinowabrukiewAug 20, 2019

The culmination of Raimi's trilogy was the biggest box office hit in the history of Spider-Man's adventures. However, it did not convince a director of previous films to continue the series. Sony decided to reboot. And here at the beginning IThe culmination of Raimi's trilogy was the biggest box office hit in the history of Spider-Man's adventures. However, it did not convince a director of previous films to continue the series. Sony decided to reboot. And here at the beginning I will say that I am a supporter of reboots, I always give a chance to fresh visions of new creators. The problem is that Marc Webb's idea was not innovative in any way, the guy shot completely the same as his predecessor, introducing minor changes and at the same time the lack of consistency between the following events. The theme of the mysterious death of Parker's parents is badly done (more time has been devoted to it in the sequel, but it's not a compensation, it's a proof of lack of sense in presenting it in the first installment). Andrew Garfield in the lead role is the total opposite of the figure presented by Tobey Maguir a decade earlier. He is a popular guy at school, who's got chicks, skateboarding and always has control of the situation. It's a denial of a comic book character that doesn't even work in the within the framework of this particular film. Originally, Peter Parker lost his uncle Ben due to, among other things, bad use of his powers, which results in after all, the essence of being Spider-Man, because "with great power comes great responsibility". Here Peter simply does not use his skills for any purpose. In turn these actually good elements of the newer genesis, which do not bring shame to production, are mechanical web shooters. The affair is outlined quite a bit just like the old one, brought to the forefront and damn tiring. The Lizard has a good timing, but is still accompanied by CGI making, that great action scenes lose their quality because in my opinion they are visually closer to one of Michael Bay's ninja turtles than opponent for Spider-Man.
As a result, the "Amazing Spider-Man" is a more consistent production than that of the "Amazing Spider-Man 2", but it's still soulless and boring story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Freddie2004Jul 22, 2019

The Amazing Spider-Man- A slow and dark reboot of the comical Sam Raimi trilogy that succeeds in bringing an interesting origin story but undoubtedly fails in the final 3rd act on providing a compelling final showdown between Peter and theThe Amazing Spider-Man- A slow and dark reboot of the comical Sam Raimi trilogy that succeeds in bringing an interesting origin story but undoubtedly fails in the final 3rd act on providing a compelling final showdown between Peter and the poorly designed Lizard.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Ahmedrizwan11Jul 10, 2019

Every scene in this movie is amazing. it is way better than the original. i found it very interesting and the movie was amazing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MLR_9902Jun 11, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Amazing Spider-Man opens with a young Peter playing hide and seek with his father. I find this funny since Peter spends the whole movie looking for a father figure, he finds the spider trying to find closure with Campbell Scott's Richard Parker his actual father, he loses Martin Sheen's uncle Ben because he takes the father he has for granted, he creates The Lizard by trying to fix Rhys Ifans' Dr. Connors' arm (or his 'broken piece') in doing this Peter tries to fix his own fatherless void (in other words Peter's 'broken piece'). In doing all of this another father figure, Denis Leary's Captain Stacy loses his life. One might say The Amazing Spider-Man is about father-less voids and filling those voids, or one might say it is about fatherhood, or one might say that the opening scene is a metaphor for Peter's character arc and his motivation, 'a young Peter Parker goes looking for his father'. So Andrew Garfield's Peter Parker has 'daddy issues', what do 'daddy issues' or abandonment do to a kid? Well Garfield's Peter Parker starts the movie as a very unlikeable character, he's irresponsible, he skateboards down the hall acting some what 'rebellious', he's got a chip on his shoulder and he is definitely not afraid to show it. The whole point is that Garfield's Peter Parker is selfish. He starts this film completely and utterly selfish, I understand why this film loses Spider-Man fans because he is still this selfish kid after he dawns the Spider-Man suit. We as audience members usually associate the dawning of the suit as the completion of a character arc, like in the Sam Raimi movie, but this is not the case with The Amazing Spider-Man, after he finally makes the suit he becomes even more of an unlikeable character, laughs it about the entire time, he forgets Sally Field's Aunt May's eggs. He tells a police officer, "I just did 80% of your job and this is how you repay me?", he then takes the police officer's gun and throws it away and makes his escape. He shows up late and dirty to Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy's family dinner and causes an argument with her father Captain Stacy. He is pretty much only Spider-Man to find Uncle Ben's killer, he doesn't like cops, he doesn't like authority. He has no intention of helping anyone but himself, like I said, selfish. Spider-Man's motivation isn't guilt at this point, it's vengeance, vengeance on Uncle Ben's killer, vengeance on anyone who ever makes him look small. This is why he tortures the car thief, it's the bullying victim becoming the bully. You're probably thinking that's not Spider-Man-like or heroic at all, but that's the point. This is why Captain Stacy says things like, "He's hunting down a bunch of criminals that all look the same, like he's got some personal vendetta, but he's not protecting innocent people. Mr. Parker" Peter isn't protecting innocent people, he's doing anything remotely heroic and the film knows it. He isn't acting like Spider-Man... Not yet, Peter Parker truly becomes Spider-Man at the bridge scene. This is were Spider-Man and The Lizard finally meet and this forces Peter to finally act like a real hero. Peter is trying to save a kid in his car that has been tossed over the bridge by The Lizard. Now this kid gives off a familiar vibe. The kid is like Peter. Spider-Man is trying to save this little boy, Peter is trying to save this boy, He does this by giving the kid the mask, this gives him courage to climb up the car that's literally hanging by a thread to Peter. The mask, Spider-Man's mask gives the boy courage to be saved by Peter, The mask gives Peter the courage to save the boy. In this moment Peter is not selfish, he really is a hero, but what happens next? Spider-Man brings the boy back to his father. Spider-Man reunites this boy with his father, Peter gives the boy something Peter can never have again, he acts completely out of selflessness for the first time in the film, by doing that he's finally able to truly call himself "Spider-Man". This moment on the bridge is the birth of Spider-Man and every thing Spider-Man stands for. Watching Peter go from an egotistical, selfish, vengeful person, to becoming a selfless hero is a very powerful and amazing character arc. This is what I really like from this Movie. Peter is always facing the consequences of his selfishness, the death of Uncle Ben and the lecture from Captain Stacy help him realise who he is truely meant to be. Personally I believe the writing of this film is really good, but it is not great. As I was watching I saw many flaws and plot holes in the film. Basically the main problem for the film is the writing. It's great at times but really lazy at other times. Otherwise the rest of the film is pretty good. The acting is great from all the cast. Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone have great chemistry. Any scene with them two in it is great to watch. Marc Webb is a great director. The score is brilliant. If I could, I would give this movie a 7.5, It's not a 7, or an 8… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JPKJun 9, 2019

Pretty Good Reboot
Though it’s slightly unnecessary, The Amazing Spider-Man’s strengths overcome it's flaws with excellent performances from Garfield and Stone.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

metrallas2010May 31, 2019

Long, boring, pointless. Teen drama meets soap opera, bad script, rly bad timing a massacre to the character.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

mikefaiscaMay 19, 2019

Great spider man, mediocre Peter Parker, greath chemistry between Gwen and Peter, good cgi and good suit.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

dislexicpotatoApr 14, 2019

Andrew Garfield does a great job as Spider Man, although he's a little too good looking to pull off the Peter Parker. The film has plenty of ideas that are pulled off well and the chemistry between Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone is superb.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

TomtagApr 14, 2019

It wasn't as good as the earlier franchise but it had revealed more thinga we should know about Spider-Man

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TyranianApr 7, 2019

Decent attempt at this iconic character with strong visuals and acting but less strong writing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

DerekReideApr 7, 2019

Here's what I have to say to the Sony ruined franchise. It's watchable, but it's bad.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

BrunoVn00Mar 31, 2019

Why did this movie exist? It is a soulless product obviously made just to keep the movie rights to Spider-Man away from the hands of Marvel Studios. The Bad:
-This is a pointless movie that basically tells the exact same story as the firstWhy did this movie exist? It is a soulless product obviously made just to keep the movie rights to Spider-Man away from the hands of Marvel Studios. The Bad:
-This is a pointless movie that basically tells the exact same story as the first Sam Raimi Spider-Man, just switch MJ with Gwen, switch the Green Goblin, an Oscorp scientist that tests his experiment on himself and becomes the bad guy, with the Lizard, an Oscorp scientist that tests his experiment on himself and becomes the bad guy. Then at the end Spider-Man fights the bad guy, Spider-Man wins (this isn't a spoiler, ain't that obvious?)and you know the rest. This movie was marketed as "the untold Spider-Man story" and the only thing untold is the story of Peter's parents but really that is just pointless.
-This is a tonally inconsistent movie. This was marketed as a dark, "realistic" movie, like this tried to be like the Dark Knight I guess, but that doesn't fit with Spider-Man's character. Yes, fans praise that this new Spider-Man is now more comic book-accurate than Tobey's Spider-Man as now he says cheesy one-liners when fighting, but, that doesn't fit the tone this movie tries to give! So some parts tried to be dark, but then it becomes silly and cheesy and so on.
-Andrew Garfield doesn't fit the nerdy, socially awkward personality that Peter Parker is generally known for. The movie tries for a while make him look like he's that way but it just doesn't work. Garfield is a competent actor but he's not a good fit for the character.
-The villain is weak and has no motivation and he looks dumb as the Lizard. He's not memorable, he's not intimidating, he's just nothing.

The Good:
-The scenes between Gwen and Peter are actually pretty well written and acted, that's expected from the director of 500 Days of Summer, don't you think?

It's not a terrible movie but it doesn't come close to be as good as the original trilogy. Hope the sequel is better and hopefully doesn't somehow make the worst elements of this movie even worse...Oh wait...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

Deanfm123456789Mar 3, 2019

After 3 Big Successes of Superhero Films, We get a Reboot of a good Franchise, This Franchise Obviously was a Huge Step down for the original Trilogy, which was even better than this **** franchise, There nothing even good about it besidesAfter 3 Big Successes of Superhero Films, We get a Reboot of a good Franchise, This Franchise Obviously was a Huge Step down for the original Trilogy, which was even better than this **** franchise, There nothing even good about it besides the swinging scenes, So this will obviously be the 2nd worst Spider-Man Movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

sparrowuckdudeDec 7, 2018

fantastic movie better than the raimi trilogy and i recomend every one to watch it

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

GenuineBruv2021Oct 25, 2018

This movie isn't a bad movie at all, it feels like a fresh new take on Spider-Man while at the same time it also feels like repetition. I really hate the sub plot with Peter's parents, it really isn't interesting at all to me. I like AndrewThis movie isn't a bad movie at all, it feels like a fresh new take on Spider-Man while at the same time it also feels like repetition. I really hate the sub plot with Peter's parents, it really isn't interesting at all to me. I like Andrew Garfield's portrayal of Peter Parker/Spider-Man, but the movie suffers from some tonal issues. The movie tries to be dark and depressing at times and it comes off as lazy and rushed. The train scene in the beginning of the movie is so badly edited its almost irritating, the villain's motivations are down right stupid. Dr Conners wants to turn the whole city into lizards for some reason, it just doesn't make sense, and it takes too long for the movie to get going. It spends most of the run time setting things up and it becomes boring after a while. The acting is solid and there is a lot of chemistry with Peter and Gwen (the actors were dating at the time so that's why). This movie does feel like a breathe of fresh air in a way. Overall The Amazing Spider-Man is a good movie with some major flaws that mostly have to do with the plot and pacing of the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

OnaskOct 21, 2018

Película entretenida, sin más. No marca ni un antes ni un después en el personaje ni mucho menos. Un villano y un Spider-Man decentes. Peter Parker y Gwen son bastante infumables, especialmente el primero (que de repente es un tipo guapo yPelícula entretenida, sin más. No marca ni un antes ni un después en el personaje ni mucho menos. Un villano y un Spider-Man decentes. Peter Parker y Gwen son bastante infumables, especialmente el primero (que de repente es un tipo guapo y guay que hace cosas de tipo guapo y guay).

Te intenta hacer soltar la lagrimilla al final de manera desastrosa, pero perdonable.

Recomendada para pasar el rato.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ErikTheCriticOct 5, 2018

Though the villain in the movie is severely underdeveloped with unclear motivations, the new reboot has exciting thrills and a great portrayal of Spider-Man by Andrew Garfield.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

Patoka-ivanOct 5, 2018

**** that does not deserve film distribution. Everything in this film is pathetic, and the replaying actors and screenplay and everything is all everything ...

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

0

TheTalkSep 23, 2018

I hate this. As a loyal and complete Spider-Man, this is the worst rendition of the vigilante that I have ever gotten to watch. The persona of Peter Park is wrong physically and in spirit; his motivations to be Spider-Man are messed up untilI hate this. As a loyal and complete Spider-Man, this is the worst rendition of the vigilante that I have ever gotten to watch. The persona of Peter Park is wrong physically and in spirit; his motivations to be Spider-Man are messed up until like, almost the end of the film. It's ridiculous. I'm not asking for a quick progression to the hero, but honestly? It hurts to watch. Because there's one thing Spider-Man has always been: with great power comes great responsibility— by the end of the film, this Peter has not learnt one lesson at all about what means to be a hero, to be Spider-Man.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

bimmybob2001Aug 3, 2018

I thought Andrew Garfield did his best, and I even liked some of the Action in the Film. but my Biggest Problem with htis film is that it just Rehashes a lot of things from the Sam Raimi movies. the Director even said before the Films releaseI thought Andrew Garfield did his best, and I even liked some of the Action in the Film. but my Biggest Problem with htis film is that it just Rehashes a lot of things from the Sam Raimi movies. the Director even said before the Films release that they were doing something new.....which they did Not. also the Villain should've been Improved… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Max_SpideyApr 24, 2018

[PT-BR] The Amazing Spider-man é um filme "ok", a origem do personagem ficou decente, temos uma boa interpretação de personagens clássicos, como a Tia May e Gwen Stacy.
O Peter Parker interpretado por Andrew Garfield não me agradou tanto,[PT-BR] The Amazing Spider-man é um filme "ok", a origem do personagem ficou decente, temos uma boa interpretação de personagens clássicos, como a Tia May e Gwen Stacy.
O Peter Parker interpretado por Andrew Garfield não me agradou tanto, talvez por eu gostar mais do jeito nerd do Peter(igual ao Peter das HQs clássicas)do que o do Peter um pouco mais descolado(HQs ultimate), o vilão é o Lagarto, que eu não é um bom vilão, seria muito melhor adicionarem uma mulher e um filho ao Connors, assim ele tendo uma maior profundidade e o Peter tendo o peso em sua consciência de não machucar seu amigo Connors.
A trilha sonora não tem o mesmo tom heróico que existe na trilogia de Sam Raimi, porém ainda sim é boa.
As cenas de ação são boas,e o filme contém um bom CGI.
Para um reboot que eu não esperava muita coisa, até que o filme não saiu tão ruim, porém a sua sequência...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Dragonfly44May 5, 2018

This movie isn’t bad.
It’s just way too overshadowed by the much superior Spider-Man trilogy from 2002-2007. Rating - 75%

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

CTHReviewsFeb 3, 2018

I have no clue why people hated The Amazing Spider-Man. This film actually handles its characters in a realistic way, SHOWS how smart Peter Parker is instead of only TELLING us, and has one of, if not the greatest comic book movie loveI have no clue why people hated The Amazing Spider-Man. This film actually handles its characters in a realistic way, SHOWS how smart Peter Parker is instead of only TELLING us, and has one of, if not the greatest comic book movie love interest with Gwen Stacy. She doesn't sit on her ass waiting for Spider-Man to save her, she actually helps him on his mission! When do we ever see that?! I love this movie. One of the best comic book movies of all time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MonkiReviewsDec 16, 2017

A great new version of Spider-Man. I think the actors did a great job, and Spider-Man, seemed like Spider-Man! The special effects have improved from the last 3, probably the best special effects yet to be honest. The villain was a greatA great new version of Spider-Man. I think the actors did a great job, and Spider-Man, seemed like Spider-Man! The special effects have improved from the last 3, probably the best special effects yet to be honest. The villain was a great choice too, especially because he wasn’t a repeat of one the the last few villains. It is worth a watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

mrdr4gonDec 15, 2017

Very threadbare in terms of the totality of what it is, but everything that it does provide is decent. There's not much to complain about. Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone are both great though.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

3

JP32Nov 3, 2017

There is a fundamental problem with The Amazing Spider-Man. The handling of Andrew Garfield's Peter Parker is all wrong. There is something non-negotiable about the character of Peter Parker, something essential to his personality. He has toThere is a fundamental problem with The Amazing Spider-Man. The handling of Andrew Garfield's Peter Parker is all wrong. There is something non-negotiable about the character of Peter Parker, something essential to his personality. He has to be uncool. Tobey Maguire brought to the role a sweet, boyish naiveté. Garfield's version is a sulky male-model.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SrPepeNov 13, 2017

Una buena película con un villano poco convencional y una interesante trama. Posiblemente aparece el mejor cameo de Stan Lee de todos. Sin embargo, pasa sin pena ni gloria.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SonicHD7May 31, 2017

Abandoned by his parents and raised by an aunt and uncle, teenager Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield), AKA Spider-Man, is trying to sort out who he is and exactly what his feelings are for his first crush, Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). When PeterAbandoned by his parents and raised by an aunt and uncle, teenager Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield), AKA Spider-Man, is trying to sort out who he is and exactly what his feelings are for his first crush, Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). When Peter finds a mysterious briefcase that was his father's, he pursues a quest to solve his parents' disappearance. His search takes him to Oscorp and the lab of Dr. Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans), setting him on a collision course with Connors' alter ego, the Lizard.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ourtimehascomeMar 3, 2017

Bloated in its misunderstanding of the source material. Garfield and Stone are enjoyable as Parker and Stacy, which makes the rest of the film somewhat bearable. Overwrought with nonsensical expository information, and the characterization ofBloated in its misunderstanding of the source material. Garfield and Stone are enjoyable as Parker and Stacy, which makes the rest of the film somewhat bearable. Overwrought with nonsensical expository information, and the characterization of Peter Parker is ridiculous. He's a bookworm and outcast, yet he dresses like a skater from the 90's. Though the romance is believable, the bullying is not. Characters are one-dimensional. The sound design is outright laughable and I expected more from Webb's directorial debut. It's difficult to imagine a world in which the lizard's CGI is considered acceptable.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

Jack97Dec 24, 2016

Spider-Man has the quips and sarcastic sense of humor that was missing from the Sam Raimi films, making him a more likable hero here. Add in the excitement and great visuals you expect from a comic-book movie and you got a solid, entertainingSpider-Man has the quips and sarcastic sense of humor that was missing from the Sam Raimi films, making him a more likable hero here. Add in the excitement and great visuals you expect from a comic-book movie and you got a solid, entertaining experience.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

FreedomFightersDec 21, 2016

I still remember the reaction when "Spider-Man 4" was cancelled in 2010 and we learned that the series was being rebooted. While the middle-schooler in me was like "ooh, another Spider-Man movie! Awesome!" and all that, the general reactionI still remember the reaction when "Spider-Man 4" was cancelled in 2010 and we learned that the series was being rebooted. While the middle-schooler in me was like "ooh, another Spider-Man movie! Awesome!" and all that, the general reaction seemed to be a resounding, "huh?" And I see now why people thought that: rebooting a film so soon after the original series ended? I know, it was weird, to say the least. And yet, "The Amazing Spider-Man" worked! It was fantastically acted, stylishly-directed, visually stunning, solidly-written, action-packed, exciting, and often very witty and funny, basically everything you could want out of a superhero film. Sure, it does feel like a little bit of a retread of the original film, but all things considered, "The Amazing Spider-Man" is still a great film that superhero fans should come to enjoy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews