Read Mixed User Reviews for Terminator Genisys

4

sefrabuDec 18, 2015

Convoluted story, lack of focus, teenage humour. A dumber version of Back to the Future with sexier characters.

It's not enough to cast Arnie to call a flick "Terminator".

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

5

analogkid280Sep 23, 2015

Were these guys stoned wen the made this move. Turning this into an alternate reality is not the good way to make a film. It was like a poor remake of Terminator 3. Please kids don't do drugs. And if you do drugs please do not make action films.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

4

EpicLadySpongeFeb 3, 2016

It's already obvious that it's going to be better than Terminator Salvation but it won't be better than Rise of the Machines and basically the first two movies. Sure it was a lazy rehash from the first two movies, but you got to admitIt's already obvious that it's going to be better than Terminator Salvation but it won't be better than Rise of the Machines and basically the first two movies. Sure it was a lazy rehash from the first two movies, but you got to admit though..... it did better than Salvation.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

5

EctsoplasmMar 22, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What to say about this one... Well, I'll say it's the blandest movie of 2015. This was far from an awful movie, but it's easy to see why so many fans hated it. The T-1000 went down way too easily. Honestly, I liked the T-3000. It was meant to be a hugely dangerous new terminator model, but it went down in a way that didn't really make sense. Not really recommended, but not exactly a waste of time.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

6

CoreGamer1408Nov 22, 2018

Fun enough time travel action fest sci-fi movie. Yeah I get they tried to subvert those expectations with Sarah, John even Kyle to a degree, because where can they even go with this simple time travelling killer robot premise? Oh they wentFun enough time travel action fest sci-fi movie. Yeah I get they tried to subvert those expectations with Sarah, John even Kyle to a degree, because where can they even go with this simple time travelling killer robot premise? Oh they went right to Derp (cringe) Fate, whoopsy! T2 is peak Terminator and every other movie after is just a sad wannabe really. I do have a soft spot for T-Salvation. It is set in the future war era and not in contemporary times like T3, TG and Derp Fate.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

ty92Mar 5, 2020

This is the first Terminator movie I've seen. I found it to be a bit confusing at times. The acting was very average and the dialogue was bad in some scenes. I could tell they were acting and that's not a good thing. The action was good butThis is the first Terminator movie I've seen. I found it to be a bit confusing at times. The acting was very average and the dialogue was bad in some scenes. I could tell they were acting and that's not a good thing. The action was good but nothing blew me away. This is a average action sci-fi with nothing special about it. The 3D was pretty good but not great either. So overall just a average movie. I wouldn't watch it again. But I didn't hate it either.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

tjman09Jul 3, 2015

Terminator: Genisys has it's entertaining moments, but the story is far too confusing and weak for it to matter. The premise was intriguing, but the trailers revealed too much, and watching the film had few surprises. The script was a majorTerminator: Genisys has it's entertaining moments, but the story is far too confusing and weak for it to matter. The premise was intriguing, but the trailers revealed too much, and watching the film had few surprises. The script was a major weakness of Terminator, because it left things unexplained, revisited way too much old material from previous films, and was way too overly complex. Along with the story, the dialogue was at times forced, and tried to remind us of older, better days, for the franchise. While the script wasn't very good, the action sequences were very good, and the actors were serviceable. Unfortunately the very confusing, sometimes unexplained story weighs the entire film down, and the end result is a mediocre film.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

5

DCEdmondsJul 2, 2015

"Terminator: Genisys" 10 Scale Rating: 5.0 (Mediocre) ...

The Good: The idea and initial concept is a great one. It really felt like an old school Terminator film (finally) for the first 45 minutes or so. Re-visiting 1984 and showing us"Terminator: Genisys" 10 Scale Rating: 5.0 (Mediocre) ...

The Good: The idea and initial concept is a great one. It really felt like an old school Terminator film (finally) for the first 45 minutes or so. Re-visiting 1984 and showing us more of what the future is like were definite highlights. I was dubious about Arnold Schwarzenegger reprising the role of the T-800, but he actually does an amazing job and was at the top of his game. I'm not usually a fan of Jai Courtney, but he was solid in his portrayal of Kyle Reese. The true standout though was Jason Clarke, who played John Connor. The previews and trailers give it away, but he is ultimately the main antagonist of the film and is among the better ones that the franchise has had. Byung-hun Lee's part was small and without many lines, but he was excellent as a re-imagined T-1000, the shape-shifting Terminator from the second film. For about 1/3 of the film, my reservations dissipated and I found it to be an enjoyable and wildly entertaining film.

The Bad: Sadly, they could not keep up that pace as the movie degenerated into "Rise of the Machines" territory. The story slips and never regains it's early glory, becoming somewhat nonsensical and bland. While the first third of the film entertained, the second act was average at best and the last third was awful. The ending was also unsatisfying and doesn't fill me with hope about the future sequels that are already in the works. Emilia Clarke is also definitely no Linda Hamilton and while she tries REALLY hard, she just doesn't pull off Sarah Connor at all. Lastly, some humorous elements were crammed into the film and they felt ill-timed and out of place. The first films have a bit of dry wit to them and it works. Here though Clarke, Courtney, and even Schwarzenegger are chock full of one liners and groan inducing jokes.… Expand

9 of 13 users found this helpful94

All this user's reviews

6

ValcanKrullJul 1, 2015

“Terminator Genisys” directed by Alan Taylor is the fifth film in the Terminator franchise and sixth in the mythology if you include the cancelled TV show “Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles” that ran from 2008-2009 on Fox. While the“Terminator Genisys” directed by Alan Taylor is the fifth film in the Terminator franchise and sixth in the mythology if you include the cancelled TV show “Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles” that ran from 2008-2009 on Fox. While the film is not bad per se it is not great either feeling like another rehash of the same old material. If you count the TV show this is now the fourth time the main purpose is to stop Judgement Day and destroy Skynet. This is the inherent problem with the franchise and the reason it should have stopped after “Terminator 2: Judgement Day”. How many times can we watch the same story told over and over again? To make matters worse the plot of the movie borrows heavily from “The Sarah Connor Chronicles”. I feel the series staple of time travel is used to excess in the film. The cast is full of some of my current favorites doing their best to go through the motions on this retread. Emilia Clarke brings her usual strength in a small package that serves her well on “Game of Thrones” to the role of Sarah Connor. She strikes an excellent balance between the young T1 Sarah and the harsh chiseled Sarah of T2. I do appreciate a quick joke in the film about her small stature since she stands just over 5’1” in real life and the rest of the cast towers over her. Jason Clarke really does well with John Connor in the opening act of the film in 2029 but his character somewhat comes off the rails in the latter half of the film. Jai Courtney, as Kyle Reese, keeps getting roles despite having no chemistry with anyone he is ever in a movie with. He brings none of the soul that Michael Biehn brought to the role 31 years ago. For you “Doctor Who” fans blink twice and you’ll miss Matt Smith, billed here as Mathew Smith, in a smaller than I hoped for role that carried a lot of importance but didn’t get a lot of screen time. Also fresh off his Oscar is J.K. Simmons who maybe hadn’t won his Oscar yet when he filmed this because I didn’t even know he was in it until the opening credits rolled. As for Arnold Schwarzenegger reprising his role as the titular terminator there isn’t much for him to screw up here. The motion capture they used for his younger self is much better than it was in “Terminator Salvation” and the reason for him appearing as old as the actor is in real life fits perfectly in the narrative of the film. While the film tries to recapture some of the emotional beats of T2 it comes up a little short and instead focuses on rehashing the same two jokes with his character the whole movie. In the end if you are asking to see it, rent it, or skip it, it really depends on you the viewer. If you are a big Terminator fan that would enjoy a nostalgia trip through the first film or are just looking for a decent popcorn flick then see it in the theater. For everyone else I say rent it. You won’t be missing much even if the Mother of Dragons is in the movie. There is a mid-credit scene so don’t get up and leave once the credits start. It is very brief but once you see it you can go. There is nothing at the end of the credits.… Expand

12 of 18 users found this helpful126

All this user's reviews

5

mattpusateriJul 2, 2015

Was I entertained? Yes. There were some enjoyable echoes of the original Terminator film throughout this one, which worked well. But as its own film, it really struggles. First, I didn't care about the characters: too many chases and actionsWas I entertained? Yes. There were some enjoyable echoes of the original Terminator film throughout this one, which worked well. But as its own film, it really struggles. First, I didn't care about the characters: too many chases and actions scenes; not enough effort to put complex characters in the story. Second, I think the franchise is just out of ideas. The first two films are classics; but this, like the previous two mediocre sequels, feels like recycled plot and action from the earlier movies. Instead of standing on its own as a new story, it tries too hard to prod nostalgia while trying to keep the door open for more Terminator movies down the road. A tough balancing act. Add to that a lot of plot holes and time-travel logic knots, it's hard to walk out of this with more than a smirk and shrug.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

5

RickBellJul 5, 2015

Very stupid script and completely confusing time travel explanations that ruined the movie. Unnecessary forced sentimental moments that were jarringly out of place. If they would have kept the story more simple, then the special effects wouldVery stupid script and completely confusing time travel explanations that ruined the movie. Unnecessary forced sentimental moments that were jarringly out of place. If they would have kept the story more simple, then the special effects would have been more appreciated, but the convoluted story about alternate timelines and indecipherable time travel laws made the movie annoying.

It had its moments tho, with R-nold camping it up with his trollish face and exagerrated mugging, as if he's now some kind of freak show attraction, which I guess he's always been. He's so old and wrinkled now that it almost makes your eyes hurt and bleed just looking at his craggy old German face.

Makes you wonder about how clueless the people are who would approve of this completely asinine script. Who to blame? The producers, the director? Someone definitely is out of touch with what makes a satisfying and entertaining story.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

6

LCmyGJul 11, 2015

A solid action film in general, better than 3 and Salvation but not on par with 2. Some unnecessary soppy scenes but altogether character progression was ok.

Main plus in this film is the return of Arnie! His portrayal is top notch and toA solid action film in general, better than 3 and Salvation but not on par with 2. Some unnecessary soppy scenes but altogether character progression was ok.

Main plus in this film is the return of Arnie! His portrayal is top notch and to me surprisingly very funny!

All in all a solid film and definitely worth a watch, ignore what the critics are saying it really isn't that bad!… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

cliftonrainAug 10, 2015

Not the best in the series. but still offers thrills, humor. and welcomes Arnold back as the terminator and excels as always. He was center of attention for me and I could not but just keep watching when he came on screen.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

Gamed2longJul 11, 2015

I don't get it. The professional reviewers have rated this film quite unfavorably. But its not bad. Its no T2. Its no T1. But in my opinion its better than T3 and whatever that last one was called.
Emilia Clarke is a good enough SarahI don't get it. The professional reviewers have rated this film quite unfavorably. But its not bad. Its no T2. Its no T1. But in my opinion its better than T3 and whatever that last one was called.
Emilia Clarke is a good enough Sarah Conner. She's given better performances before, and probably will again. I doubt she'll win an award for this role. But its good enough. Arnie is back. He may be incapable of doing most of the things his younger self did in previous films, but through movie magic he too plays his role good enough. He doesn't show his age quite so bad as Harrison Ford of late. The actor playing Kyle Reece is intended as kind of a blank slate, so that is done well.
The biggest failing of this film is that the story, and visuals have lost a lot of the grit. The CG is a bit too smooth at times, and the gravity of situations is often missing because of it. The bad guy wasn't quite real enough. With a good old T101, a blow to the head stunned, gunfire to the torso or head caused minor damage. It was clear what merited a "kill." This new guy though. At one point he was quite wrath like. Was anything they did having any affect on him at all?
Also. The school bus crash looked wrong. Though it was rendered like a bus, no bus would go flying like that. Not even with wires and rigging.
Overall, for me this ranks about an average action flick. Which is weak for a Terminator movie, but better than what we've been getting lately at least.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

4

StevieGJDJul 3, 2015

This is not a good movie. The story evolves somewhere between mediocre and bad. The acting is weak, with Arnold being the best part by far. The special effects are certainly nice to look at, but they are part of the problem too. The movieThis is not a good movie. The story evolves somewhere between mediocre and bad. The acting is weak, with Arnold being the best part by far. The special effects are certainly nice to look at, but they are part of the problem too. The movie is cold and lacks heart.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

4

FilmPhonicJul 2, 2015

As expected ‘Terminator Genisys’ is a lavish all-action affair that occurs before the events of the original ‘Terminator’ presenting what follows in a new light, but when is a reboot not really a reboot?, when the film consists of brazenlyAs expected ‘Terminator Genisys’ is a lavish all-action affair that occurs before the events of the original ‘Terminator’ presenting what follows in a new light, but when is a reboot not really a reboot?, when the film consists of brazenly re-hashing and combining the elements that made all of its predecessors successful.

From the mythology and characters of the original, to the scale and dynamics of “T2″ and the lighter nature of Terminator 3 plus the CGI that re-created young T-800 in ‘Terminator Salvation’ and memorable lines from all previous ‘Terminators’, this film feels like a movie made by committee with as many boxes ticked as possible and with little risk taken, particularly if you consider that a reboot has the same actor playing the same central character.

But the most offensive element of ‘Terminator Genisys’ is not its lack of creativity and reliance on nostalgia, it’s the ungainly storyline that features alternate and converging timelines and a narrative so convoluted it almost covers over the huge plot-holes and disparate elements that must be brought together, with the stakes set so high in the story, it’s remarkable how in the end the audience can care so little about the conclusion to all this mess.

This film is not completely without merit, there is an attempt at a cautionary tale about dependence on interconnected technology, but this gets lost in the quagmire of the story, the action set-pieces and CGI are impressive but not enough to sustain interest for 2 hours and nothing we haven’t seen before, but despite the scene in “T2″ never did we think that the T-800 Cyberdyne Systems Model 101 would actually become “uncle Bob”.

The Bottom Line…
Despite plenty of action sequences and the return of “Arnie”, ‘Terminator Genisys’ is an unnecessary and unmemorable addition to the franchise relying heavily on nostalgia without offering anything you haven’t seen from your typical modern Hollywood action-blockbuster.… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

6

FilmGobJul 2, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. John Connor sends Kyle Reese back in time to protect Sarah Connor, but when he arrives in 1984, nothing is as he expected it to be. The events in Genisys act as a ripple across an alternate universe. What if Skynet got to John Connor? What if a T800 saved a younger Sarah Connor? What if Judgement Day took place in 2017 instead of 1997? Yes there will be plot holes, but with this much fun who cares!

The performances are hit and miss however. Emilia Clarke cannot match the toughness or intensity of Linda Hamilton’s ‘Sarah Connor’, Jai Courtney is still not leading man material as he gives his take on Michael Biehn’s ‘Kyle Reese’ but Jason Clarke’s villainous 'John Connor' is a surprise twist that works. Where does that leave Arnold Schwarzenegger? Surprisingly his screen time is less than expected, with familiar one liners thrown in to keep the audience happy. Still, Arnold plays his role brilliantly. J.K. Simmons comes and goes as the helpful but pointless ‘O’Brien’, Matt Smith and Byung-hun Lee do well in their short roles.

So, what about the action? They are few and far between, but what is here is generic CGI summer blockbuster visuals, nothing that pushes the boundaries like you expect from this franchise. The trailer certainly gave away too much but we get visual references that respect the mythology and even add to it. In the end it’s the character development, exposition and plot that are at the forefront, which is no bad thing if it means we avoid rehashed action set pieces of previous films, which was a worry of mine going in.

Terminator: Genisys is a bold attempt to kickstart the franchise in a new direction. It may lack the cinematic intelligence of James Cameron’s originals, but after tired retreads like 'Rise of the Machines' and ‘Salvation’, this entry in the sci-fi franchise is actually well worth your time.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

4

ColginatorJul 17, 2015

Now in it's fifth instalment the Terminator series, Arnold has returned once again in another attempt to stop the seemingly unavoidable judgement day from happening. But sadly at this point it feels as if the franchise has been back too manyNow in it's fifth instalment the Terminator series, Arnold has returned once again in another attempt to stop the seemingly unavoidable judgement day from happening. But sadly at this point it feels as if the franchise has been back too many times. It fails to bring anything substantially new and instead feels more like a weak rehash of things we've already seen in previous films.

We open the film with familiar ground. In a post apocalyptic war the humans, led by John Connor (Jason Clarke), launch an assault taking out Skynet once and for all. But after their victory they discover that a T-800 (played by a CG Arnold Schwarzenegger and a body double) has been sent back in time to 1984 in order to kill Sarah Connor (Emilia Clarke) and they send Kyle Reese (Jai Courtney) back to protect her. But when he arrives everything is different. Sarah is not the meek helpless person we saw in the first Terminator, but rather a hardened warrior. And the Terminator Kyle is sent to kill has already been taken care of. with the only T-800 left being an aged model who has raised and protected Sarah since her childhood that she calls "Pops" (played by the real Schwarzenegger).

After this we diverge in to needlessly convoluted storyline of time travel silliness involving our leads travelling from 1984 to 2017, dealing with alternating time-lines that correct Kyle's memories and a new Skynet using a new "killer app" to take over the world. At times it's hard to follow and all the complicated time travel is basically the film's way of being able to reset the world and the characters to start a new slate in a more modern setting.

The strongest part of the film probably ends up being Schwarzenegger. Whilst his aged Terminator is obviously just a clever way to get him into the film, the concept of his flesh ageing as any human make sense and his "old but not obsolete" theme is different to what we've seen in previous films and does lead to some interesting scenes of his joints stiffening up mid battle. Plus as usual he does deliver the most laughs in the film through his robot trying to be human routine whilst still able to pull of the imposing figure that made the Terminator great to begin with.

But unfortunately this old Arnie seems to be the only element of the film that isn't a rehash from earlier films. The story is the same mixture we saw in T-2 with Arnie protecting the humans, a theme of whether a robot can love and the heroes attempting to stop judgement day. The only difference being that here the characters are so poorly developed that we don't really root for them the same way we did in previous instalments. Our characters are given such little time to develop that when they go from 1984 to 2017 they never have a single line of dialogue reacting to how different things are in the future.

Then there's the way the film seems to destroy the intimidating presence that Skynet had in the other films. They're defeated so quickly in the short opening with the humans toppling them like domino's, that I was left wondering how they were even a threat to begin with. But worse yet is how the film seems to ruin the intimidating image of the original T-800 from the first Terminator movie changing him from a near unstoppable presence from the first film, into an easily defeated nuisance who's defeated almost as quickly as he is introduced.

When it comes to the fight scenes they're a bit of a mixed bag. At times Alan Taylor proves himself confident of creating a decent action sequence with some of the earlier fight scenes with Byung-Hun Lee set in the 1980's are good creating a cool game of cat and mouse with a T-1000 chasing a helpless Kyle through a clothing store. But other fights just appear as mindless CGI violence looking as generic as you can get. The worst being a helicopter chase which uses some of the worst CGI that I've seen in a blockbuster movie in quite a while with helicopters having a cartoon's concept of physics and look atrociously unbelievable throughout.

Ultimately the film relies only on nostalgia. It tries to remind you of the past Terminator any time it can with half the dialogue in the film being recycled from the other movies ("I'll be back" "Come with me if you want to live" etc.) and relying on tie ins to previous Terminators showing the original T-800 along with the iconic designs of the futuristic metal exoskeletons. But in trying to do this it feels more like a homage to the Terminator films than it does a new instalment. And not a good homage either.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

4

grandpajoe6191Aug 14, 2015

"Terminator Genisys" suffers two major problems. First, it does not know how to spell "genesis". Second, the quality of the story and character development is literally scraping the bottom line while production values for all the explosions"Terminator Genisys" suffers two major problems. First, it does not know how to spell "genesis". Second, the quality of the story and character development is literally scraping the bottom line while production values for all the explosions and **** are blown to epic proportions. This seems to be a consistent issue with a lot of blockbuster reboot movies, as they all tend to bring in previous senior cast members (or popular, trending new ones), let them act out on a bland script with the most preposterous plot twists (I won't spoil anything, but there is a twist to the movie, and boy do these twists go far beyond), and use the rest of the money on car chases or huge fights that involve a lot of, you guessed it, explosions. "Terminator Genisys" is no different from the others, so the question remains; is this predictable movie really worth your green bills?… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

FallsDownzJul 11, 2015

Basically just another cliche loud dump fun pop-corn movie sequel that offer nothing but fun and that's it , it's not even deserve the "terminator" name in the movie title.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

greggaJul 10, 2015

Not a bad film to waste away a wet and dreary Saturday afternoon. Plenty of action but the confusing plot brings it down a few pegs. It's a mash of the old and the new - despite some of the other reviews Arnie definitely adds to the movie,Not a bad film to waste away a wet and dreary Saturday afternoon. Plenty of action but the confusing plot brings it down a few pegs. It's a mash of the old and the new - despite some of the other reviews Arnie definitely adds to the movie, he's like a comfortable armchair - you know what to expect from him, nothing less and nothing more. 6/10 is still a good score and if like the series you'll enjoy it.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

dharmaAug 8, 2015

Old but a little obsolete. The latest Terminator entry gets good grades for effort, but ends up with mediocre results. This reboot works because of Arnie, but didn't work because of the younger casts. Emilia Clarke is great in Game ofOld but a little obsolete. The latest Terminator entry gets good grades for effort, but ends up with mediocre results. This reboot works because of Arnie, but didn't work because of the younger casts. Emilia Clarke is great in Game of Thrones, miscast as Sarah Connor. The plot line has some smart moments, but sometimes felt like a 'parody' of the Terminator series. Even its action scenes were remixes of better set pieces from part 1 & 2. It's worth a look, entertaining in parts but simply too convoluted for its own good. The production team tried their hardest, but simply cannot match the inventiveness of James Cameron's much superior original duology.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

MeritCobaSep 26, 2015

When even a liquid killer bot seems to have more personality than the male lead, I guess we should start to worry. Arnold steals the show as a grizzled Terminator protecting yet another version of Sarah Connor in several timelines fromWhen even a liquid killer bot seems to have more personality than the male lead, I guess we should start to worry. Arnold steals the show as a grizzled Terminator protecting yet another version of Sarah Connor in several timelines from several killer bots and the viewers from crying from boredom or confusion. You got to give him the credit for at least making this movie watchable.

The plot is made up by shredding the scripts of the previous movies and then randomly gluing the paper snippets back together. You add a lot of explosions, chases and cgi to the mix to plaster over the biggest plot holes and keep the audience off balanced. Add some boring leads to the mix and Arnold shines even more.

So we have a bad Arnold bot from the first movie hopping back in time to kill Sarah, while both the guy from that first movie and a good Arnold bot of the second movie do the same to prevent that. At the same time the T-1000 liquid killer bot from the second movie makes an attempt as well, being bested by Sarah, the good Arnold bot and the male lead, while the bad Arnold bot makes another attempt on Sarah's life after being restarted by the liquid killer bot, but only to fail again..

After that, we get to hop back again in time to yet another moment in the past or hop forward to yet another timeline. Then we get some sudden intimate moments between the male and female leads, cause well they have to mate at some point to make a hero in the future of their timeline. The male lead messes up his one liners and the female lead looks like a teen and we get some more emotional and intimate moments dished to demonstrate the total lack of chemistry between the leads.

A guy who looks like that engineer dude from the Star Trek Next Generation series makes an appearance as the head of da resistance and the bad computer network is shut down in the future, but not shut down because it is actually downloaded into another bot to survive the shutdown and then turns that engineer head of the resistance dude, who also happens to be the son of the two leads, into another bot that then goes back in time to stop the leads and Arnold from stopping the bad network from destroying the world while at the same time trying to save another son of the leads of another timeline, who isn't their son therefore, from getting killed in the progress.

More stuff follows, some buildings get blown up and the world is saved so the two leads can get it on to make their own hero of a resistance that will never be,as the bad network has been killed in the past already.Of that timeline that is.

After the credits we get a cliffhanger in case someone might plan a sequel in the future that is hopefully less of a mess than this one, but if it isn't let's hope the sequel is in another timeline so we won't have to hear from it ever again in our timeline. Not in future nor in the past.

Just watch Arnold do his thing and have a laugh.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

NathonasNov 23, 2015

What is there to say really. They're cashing in on Arnie's and the Terminator franchise's popularity. The casting choices are all very bad and basically put popular/pretty actors in roles they don't fit. The plot is a big giant mess. But IWhat is there to say really. They're cashing in on Arnie's and the Terminator franchise's popularity. The casting choices are all very bad and basically put popular/pretty actors in roles they don't fit. The plot is a big giant mess. But I will still gave this a 6 because the action is fun, and it's great to see Arnold reprise his classic role.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

Nekromant1666Jul 10, 2015

Terminator died !! Long live the cash pipeline (((((
Schwarzenegger pulls up to the end !!!
PS: Stop raping the corpse of the Terminator!
PPS: If we forget that there were other films, this film at once.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

lukechristianscJul 12, 2015

The way "Terminator: Genisys" was promoted was unacceptable, the trailer spoiled the film by giving some major details that should not of happened.The film tries to do something that the franchise have never done before but it's confusing onThe way "Terminator: Genisys" was promoted was unacceptable, the trailer spoiled the film by giving some major details that should not of happened.The film tries to do something that the franchise have never done before but it's confusing on the other hand and that's what the film is going for, but it has a good idea trying to destroy Skynet before it's start a revolution between humans and machines, it's sounds good right? The script is so convoluted filled with plot holes and it barely makes any sense, obviously the film is written by people who don't care for the franchise. The film has lackluster action, that's odd because the terminator series has great action scenes, director Alan Taylor does a slick way of directing the action scenes and copying off of James Cameron. John Connor (Jason Clarke) the leader of the human resistance, sends solider Kyle Reese (Jai Courtney) back in 1984 to protect his mother Sarah Connor (Emilia Clarke from 'Game of Thrones') from another terminator assassin, creating an unexpected turn of the events in the timeline; in the first Terminator Sarah is a scared waitress, but now she is a skilled fighter and has her Terminator guardian (played once again by Arnold Schwarzenegger) by her side. With good allies and dangerous enemies Reese sets out on an unexpected new mission: reset the future and prevent Skynet from launching their app before the robot apocalypse starts and destroys mankind. There are many flaws with the movie, Arnold once again is great and brings so much energy and like ability into the Terminator and Jai Courtney was missed cast however he was fine playing Kyle Reese. Emilia Clarke was missed cast as Sarah Connor (she can act but not in this movie) she over does with her performance and Jason Clarke was not a mediocre version of John Connor like Nick Stahl, Clarke can act but doing over doing it as the John Connor character. The film is not cheesy or cliche'd it's confusing as hell and the action is mediocre. Grade C-… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

AxeTJul 7, 2015

Technically well made, big action and spectacle as expected, and Arnold in a welcome return is just fine. The problem is the movie is so confounded with time travel in a story that is mainly retread disguised as reboot sequel that it doesn'tTechnically well made, big action and spectacle as expected, and Arnold in a welcome return is just fine. The problem is the movie is so confounded with time travel in a story that is mainly retread disguised as reboot sequel that it doesn't make much sense. There are plot holes and flaws. One small one in particular I wondered about is with the filmmakers going through all the trouble of recreating 1984 Los Angeles, with beautifully shot/VFX of the downtown skyline of that era for example, then go and blow a simple detail like LAPD using a collar radio instead of a walkie talkie in that year. A very small flaw yes, but it amounts to sloppy direction. And that amounts to a befuddling story with too much action and not enough well thought out plot in a movie that drags despite the strong franchise base and fun that it has with it.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

2ofclubsJul 29, 2015

This movie isn't great, but neither is it as bad as some reviews would have you believe.
That being said, I had the benefit of seeing this film without having seen the trailer. I daresay my review score may have dropped a point (or two) hadThis movie isn't great, but neither is it as bad as some reviews would have you believe.
That being said, I had the benefit of seeing this film without having seen the trailer. I daresay my review score may have dropped a point (or two) had I seen the trailer(s). In short, the twist and best parts are all showboated.

The film begins with some good old nostalgia for the first movie, before setting us off a new terminator adventure. This is the strongest part of the film
Arnold is fast becoming a parody of himself, and this is evident here, but it almost adds a charm.

The latter part of the movie is a special effects-a-thon, reminiscent of something Michael Bay would produce.

As an aside note, there is no need for the 3D version… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

Jess_HillJul 12, 2015

An utterly ridiculous parody of itself, this is a stupid but somewhat enjoyable film. Arnie delivers some excellent one liners, and there are so many in jokes for fans of the franchise, you can't help but laugh along. Clarke does a good jobAn utterly ridiculous parody of itself, this is a stupid but somewhat enjoyable film. Arnie delivers some excellent one liners, and there are so many in jokes for fans of the franchise, you can't help but laugh along. Clarke does a good job filling some very big shoes, in spite of generally woeful dialogue, and the storyline, whilst ludicrous, is compelling enough to keep the audience interested. There are some great action sequences, and the underlying cautionary tale resonates for a contemporary audience moving inexorably towards an 'internet of things', making for a fun yet unpolished experience. 5.87/10… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

MinaGharouniOct 20, 2015

Arnold Schwarzenegger's movies were once very liked by people but now this kind of movies are not worth criticizing. I think if Alan Taylor would have made a movie about Arnold Schwarzenegger's life then it would have been worth criticizing.Arnold Schwarzenegger's movies were once very liked by people but now this kind of movies are not worth criticizing. I think if Alan Taylor would have made a movie about Arnold Schwarzenegger's life then it would have been worth criticizing. Alan's style for movie making shows that he likes making movies about heroes and we are waiting for Good movies from him.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

BB_CriticJul 1, 2015

Terminator Genysis is not hate-worthy or praise-worthy. It entertained me while I was watching and by doing that I guess it got the job done. However, the plot is very loosely written and the acting is mediocre except from Arnold who isTerminator Genysis is not hate-worthy or praise-worthy. It entertained me while I was watching and by doing that I guess it got the job done. However, the plot is very loosely written and the acting is mediocre except from Arnold who is perfect in the role yet again. 6/10… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

6

MaxIndieGamesJul 1, 2015

This movie is like what "HATRED" is to video-games (but then without the controversy part) or in other words a disappointment, the only good thing about this movie is Arnold's performance, which in all honestly isn't really worth watching itThis movie is like what "HATRED" is to video-games (but then without the controversy part) or in other words a disappointment, the only good thing about this movie is Arnold's performance, which in all honestly isn't really worth watching it for, as he doesn't appear as much as he should to keep you interested.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

6

kevtheobaldJul 3, 2015

If you love Terminator movies, this will be worth seeing. If you love action movies, this is still worth seeing. If you want to see an amazing story with great lines and great acting across the board, skip this one.

You have to go in withIf you love Terminator movies, this will be worth seeing. If you love action movies, this is still worth seeing. If you want to see an amazing story with great lines and great acting across the board, skip this one.

You have to go in with the right mind set. It is a popcorn flick, not designed to be the greatest movie ever made.

The action scenes were mixed in terms of quality. I did not care for the cartoonish nature of the helicopter chase. I know action movies breaks the laws of physics all the time, but I think G.I. Joe the cartoon had better helicopter physics.

The acting was very mixed. I wanted to like the new Sarah Conner, but she just did not pull off that bad ass charisma like Linda Hamilton did. Arnold did a fine job being Arnold. The actor doing John Carter's roll was very good.

The trailers did giveaway a chunk of the story twists, but there still maybe one surprise remaining. Sadly, most of the movie was predictable.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

6

Jim222001Jul 23, 2015

Terminator Genisys is like the A Good Day to Die Hard of Terminator movies. It's all action and not enough brains. Which is a shame since it had some good casting. IGN said Emilia Clarke was miscast as Sarah Connor but she is perfectly toughTerminator Genisys is like the A Good Day to Die Hard of Terminator movies. It's all action and not enough brains. Which is a shame since it had some good casting. IGN said Emilia Clarke was miscast as Sarah Connor but she is perfectly tough and badass.
To me it's Jai Courtney (A Good Day to Die Hard) who was miscast as Kyle Reese. Courtney was perfect as a jerky villain in the Divergent movies. He's bland when he plays a hero though. However Schwarzenegger slips back into the Terminator role perfectly. J.K. Simmons adds good comic relief as a Detective who believes Connor and Reese's crazy stories about Armageddon and robots. While Matt Smith (Doctor Who) makes small creepy appearances as Skynet.
Despite good action the movie sort of feels like a ride to nowhere. While feeling a little way too familiar despite the story supposed to be being fresh this time around. It feels like Terminator 2 but without a solid plot.
While John Connor's wife Kate Brewster was written out completely. Hell the John Connor character even gets the short end of the stick this time around. Reese cares more than Sarah that John is a T-1000 now. But everyone shoots at him nevertheless and he's blown up multiple times. So one seems too concerned to reverse the process.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

jsharbourJul 26, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. My mom could portray a better T-800 than Arnold does in this film, with his cheeky one-liners, gray hair, and--and WHERE exactly did he come from, anyway? And in what timeline does a terminator go back to 8-year old Sarah Connor? There are so many timelines flying around, AND YET, despite sort of comprehending what that means, the script STILL insists that there's a Judgment Day and someone has to go back and stop it. Never mind the current theories in physics.

Warning: Spoilers

I liked the actors but not the acting, which was painfully bad at times. Some of Sarah (Emilia Clarke)'s one-liners are quite dated which puts into question how long the script has been circulating--without a refresh? Who says "What, really?" anymore? It's not even remotely funny today.

The concept of a terminator's skin healing but still aging is ridiculous and stupid and really wrecks your SoD. And, how many terminator models are there anyway? Seriously, how many are needed to infiltrate and kill humans in the war? You really don't need that many.

When Reese goes back in time for the first time, he emerges into a huge mess of a timeline where Sarah knows who he is (and somehow knows exactly when and where he's going to appear so she can save him "in the nick"), with the Pops terminator (I just don't know...), the new liquid terminator, and... and then there's the evil Google OS takeover of the world that somehow knows it is Skynet even though it's a mobile device OS and goes global before it's even released.

Do these guys even know what it means to LAUNCH a new app or new OS? Do they comprehend that the whole plot of the "new & improved" Skynet 2.0 revolves around billions of distributed devices around the world (smartphones, tablets, computers, cars, etc) is what gives Skynet its processing power and allows it to become self aware? But forget all that... before the launch of the new "killer app" to the world, Skynet becomes self aware before launch and begins to radically evolve. So, what was the whole launch thing about again? I forget... if it runs on a single supercomputer, why does it need to be distributed? And if it's NOT distributed, how can it gain power over military computers, including ICBMs?

Argh! Yes, that's a lot of questions. So, assume the writers are unbelievable morons, close your ears and say "Lalalalalalalalalalalaaaaaaaaaa" during the dialog because you'll understand just as much that way.

I don't get how Emilia Clarke looks or acts or is in any way reminiscent of Linda Hamilton. Although... with Daeneris vyying for the Iron Throne, occupied by Queen Cersei, played by ANOTHER version of Sarah Connor (Lena Headey--see The Sarah Connor Chronicles), is that an inside joke by the producers? I can't help but wonder because though I like Emilia Clarke, it makes no sense to cast her in this role. I never bought for one second that she's the tough-as-nails tankgirl she's supposed to be. Then again, Lena didn't quite pull that off either, so, maybe it's appropriate. Now I can't help but wonder if Daeneris and Cersei will make nice and stop trying to kill each other now that they have shared a soul.

I kind of like this film but a second viewing is necessary to decide. There are some real no-nos in the dialog, with unpleasant monologues droning on and on to fill in nonsense that doesn't make sense anyway. I thought it was more fun than Salvation, esp with Chris Bale out of the way. Seriously, is John Connor Irish or isn't he? Why the flip flop? I get that he's Irish. So frigging what? The casting should be done because of the role, not the implied race. Just more stupid... So, I found a lot to be annoyed with, but enough to maybe prop it up after a second watch, though not at full price.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

moviecritic68Jul 8, 2015

To be honest, I only chose to go see this movie due to the absence of any new good releases. So that being said and me not being a big "Terminator" type of guy I will give this movie a so-so and stick with the majority on the rating. ITo be honest, I only chose to go see this movie due to the absence of any new good releases. So that being said and me not being a big "Terminator" type of guy I will give this movie a so-so and stick with the majority on the rating. I actually nodded off earlier in the movie. I'm sure there are those of you who liked this movie but any rating above 8 is hard to comprehend. Time to put this story to rest. It has outlived it's time… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

Th3GreenHorne7Jul 4, 2015

If you are looking for a guys night out kind of movie, Terminator Genisys is what your looking for, it was a very explosive, fast-paced film that very frequently loses it's way of letting you understand what's going on for the 1st half ofIf you are looking for a guys night out kind of movie, Terminator Genisys is what your looking for, it was a very explosive, fast-paced film that very frequently loses it's way of letting you understand what's going on for the 1st half of the movie. The actors and actress of this film could make you care less if they die or not, but Schwarzenegger had shown the cast that he could still be the best Terminator with one his best performances in the past couple years. Like I said, it's like a guys night out kind of movies.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

octobermoonlighJul 1, 2015

Terminator movies are like pizza - even a bad Terminator movie is good. Unless, of course, it is rancid and spoiled. I saw this movie in IMAX 3D on opening night and ended up terribly disappointed.

The acting is cringe-worthy across theTerminator movies are like pizza - even a bad Terminator movie is good. Unless, of course, it is rancid and spoiled. I saw this movie in IMAX 3D on opening night and ended up terribly disappointed.

The acting is cringe-worthy across the board. An early scene with John Conner and Reese looks like an pre-production shot where the actors are simply reciting lines in an unenthusiastic monotone while the techs setup the lighting. And this poor quality is consistent throughout.

I saw an interview with Cameron where he describes Sarah Conner as being tough yet vulnerable, an interesting dichotomy of conflicting character traits. Nope. Not only is the acting terrible, but the character is as one dimensional as she can be. She is also a completely despicable nag. She doesn't come across as tough at all, she comes across as a spoiled brat.

The character of Reese is miscast with Jai Courtney. This guy looks fragile, metrosexual, and not at all interested in Sarah Conner. In fact, as long as lovingly starring into the eyes of a lovier, the scenes he has with John Conner are much more romantic. As Reese is disrobed and prepares for time travel the T800 Arnold looks down at Reese's pelvic region and comments on how little he has to offer Sarah. This doesn't really come across as a joke either, the audience just accepts the T800 is describing Reese's small anatomy. He is bossed around by Sarah constantly throughout the film. Every single time a character in the film refers to the baby making love scene between Sarah and Reese the verb "mating" is used. Not exactly hero material and absolutely nothing like Reese from the original film.

Arnold pops in and out of the scenes when convenient. Several jokes and comments about his age are thrown in. He is referred to as "Pops" by Sarah and Reese. I'll give Arnold the benefit of the doubt and chalk this one up to a bad script, but he doesn't even seem like a Terminator. He just acts like a regular grandfather type figure. This is explained in the film by saying that Sarah has trained him for years to be like a human, so he now doesn't even act like a Terminator at all. He smiles, sarcastically jokes, develops a father-boyfriend rivalry with Reese, and even loves "his Sarah". Not exactly the emotionless cold blooded murdering machine from the first film nor the reprogrammed unit from the second.

The movie shows some potential when the original T800 young Arnold shows up. But if you have scene the trailer, you've seen the scene. It is gone as quickly as it appears. Instead, the movie relies on super-hero type special effects that could just as easily felt at home in Spiderman, Batman, or the Avengers. The bad guy isn't a robot from the future, it's the Sandman.

James Cameron put his credibility on the line by saying that he approved of this film? I hope they paid him well for that endorsement. Fool me once, shame on me...… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

5

ReubenIsAGodJul 3, 2015

It wasnt bad, but it wasnt amazing or anything Spectacular. I mean i would recommend seeing Jurassic World opposed to terminator genisys, both are stupid Blockbuster action films, but Jurassic Park has better acting and is just generallyIt wasnt bad, but it wasnt amazing or anything Spectacular. I mean i would recommend seeing Jurassic World opposed to terminator genisys, both are stupid Blockbuster action films, but Jurassic Park has better acting and is just generally obscured, in a good way. My main, and biggest flaw with the movie is the films story, it's a mess, the amount of inconsistencies and the fact that it just doesn't make sense after awhile is truly awful. Also the characters are all horribly implemented. Yet other-all i cant say i wasn't entertained, because it was a fun film, also the return of Arnold Swarenager really is the films Charm, it is the greatest part of the film besides the action. I think its safe to say that the film is a good time killer if yur board and just wanna watch **** blow up. Otherwise it is a disappointing squeal to an already damaged property, i think its time for Terminator to die, nobody seems to know what they are doing with the franchise.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

5

A7sus4Jul 6, 2015

Honestly this movie hits on all cylinders. It's certainly better than the last 2 sequels and it would've probably kept the franchise alive had it been the third movie made. Unfortunately at this point I really didn't care. The movie becameHonestly this movie hits on all cylinders. It's certainly better than the last 2 sequels and it would've probably kept the franchise alive had it been the third movie made. Unfortunately at this point I really didn't care. The movie became really boring and stale really fast; probably around the "stop skynet before it starts" breakthrough... I hadn't heard that before... As such I felt like I'd already seen it 100 times and just wanted it to end.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

TVJerryJul 7, 2015

With the movies in this series, time travel and cyborgs play the biggest part. This plot combines several periods and characters to confuse a plot that really doesn't matter. We're really watching for 2 things: cool effects and amazingWith the movies in this series, time travel and cyborgs play the biggest part. This plot combines several periods and characters to confuse a plot that really doesn't matter. We're really watching for 2 things: cool effects and amazing action. There's lots of the molten metal that we've seen before (yawn) and the new regeneration effect is not exceptional or eye-popping. There's lots of fighting and gunplay, but most of it's unoriginal and unexciting. Arnold Schwarzenegger is back doing most of the heavy lifting and cracking some lame new jokes. While the pace only lags for a few boring dialogue moments, nothing about the conflicts or concepts is unique, thrilling or special. NOTE: Stay thru the early credits for a teaser.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

Ansatsu83Jul 7, 2015

Its ok, its not great and its not bad. The good news is, they got the future war scenes down right. Shame there was only 15 minutes of the future war. However, the actor they got to play Kyle Reese was not suited to the role. His stale andIts ok, its not great and its not bad. The good news is, they got the future war scenes down right. Shame there was only 15 minutes of the future war. However, the actor they got to play Kyle Reese was not suited to the role. His stale and lifeless acting would have better been suited to the role of the t-1000.

The alternate timeline characters were not really developed well, I didn't end up caring about the characters as much as I did about the ones in the first and second movie. I ended up thinking the t-3000 had more personality than Kyle Reese and Sarah Connor , combined...

I did come to a realization from the movie, though. Genisys is an operating system to sync up various forms of social media, everything on one platform. Apple products are the same way, social media and devices. Skynet is a Mac!

It's not a terrible movie, but its not great. Its better than salvation but worse than t3... Terminator genisys is, to the terminator franchise, to what the sega cd was to the sega genesis, life support for a dying product (pun intended).… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

TheQuietGamerDec 8, 2015

A sequel/reboot to the franchise that ultimately fails to capture the magic of the originals. The magic of the time-traveling, sci-fi series isn't quite captured here as the story and changes to the timeline go under-explained. As a result,A sequel/reboot to the franchise that ultimately fails to capture the magic of the originals. The magic of the time-traveling, sci-fi series isn't quite captured here as the story and changes to the timeline go under-explained. As a result, the whole thing feels convoluted. At least the action is solid.

The story and characters are really the problem here. Unfortunately both of those elements have always been a big part of the series. When the story isn't making a mess of the timeline, it's hitting many all too familiar beats. The recreation of scenes from the first two movies early on are pretty cool to watch. These references add a nice bit of nostalgia to keep you going. The problem is that the movie doesn't borrow enough from it's predecessors, and too much from the average, generic action-flick.

Perhaps the whole thing would have been more interesting had the characters been better. Unfortunately series favorites have been reduced to generic character types played by subpar actors. Jai Courtney proves once again to be competent, but strangely unlikable. Same can be said for Emilia Clarke as Sarah Connor. Schwarzenegger is the highlight. He's always stolen the show in these movies, but he's always been surrounded by a great cast as well. Outside of Jason Clarke that isn't so much the case here. He's the best actor onscreen, and he is unfortunately underutilized in favor of stale moments between Reese and the Connor's.

There are reasons to watch it though. On the action side of things it fares much better. Granted, it never reaches the heights of the original films, but there is a satisfying amount of explosions and gunfire. Enough to keep things watchable and at least mindlessly entertaining throughout it's runtime. Even with his age watching Arnold slamming through walls and clashing with other Terminators is a blast. The man is still the best action star out there in my opinion.

Had the overall conflict been better written and the cast been strong enough to back up the flashy action the movie could have been a worthy successor to the series. As it stands it's a flawed, but solid action film with a few good references to the originals and some entertaining action throughout. While it is far from another strong entry in the series, it is a solid action movie worth a watch for longtime fans of the series just to see what has to offer and what it means for the future of the series. For everyone else it's just a generic, but pretty entertaining action film worth a rental and a watch on a rainy day. It's just a shame it doesn't offer much more overall.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

netflicJul 6, 2015

This movie is for Terminator fans. I happen to be on of them, therefore I disregarded critics' low ratings and went to see it.
Well, in short, if you do not expect much, you will not be disappointed.
Action is not revolutionary butThis movie is for Terminator fans. I happen to be on of them, therefore I disregarded critics' low ratings and went to see it.
Well, in short, if you do not expect much, you will not be disappointed.

Action is not revolutionary but capturing and entertaining. Acting is decent, and Ah-a-nold is great. You can always count on comic relief if he is in. It was nice to see him back.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

ledaumasJul 11, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I would have liked this movie a lot better if they didn't turn John Connor into an evil person. Couldn't they come up with another villain and another angle on the story? For instance, seeing the same familiar story change completely because of one thing disrupting whatever happened in a previous movie, giving the same set of circumstances a completely different outcome the heroes have to overcome. I did like the operating system angle. That almost accomplished an interesting angle until John turned bad. So many other more interesting angles could have been used. But, as usual, the effects are great and the movie was entertaining, except for the bad John. Jason Clarke is excellent, but I want him to stay the hero. Our technology being the villain where people misuse it would have been a better focus. That would be very thought provoking because it could happen.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

AGKJul 8, 2015

The movie itself is alright but the storyline jumps a lot and it's just way too confusing to keep up with all of it and it has the cliche of a love story kiss at the end of the movie but the action was good.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

marcmyworksJul 7, 2015

Its hard enough breathing fresh life into a dying franchise, but to an extent this film does it. Besides the generic script and soap opera acting and whining, Genisys brings another interesting comment on todays technology.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

diogomendesJul 17, 2015

Although not as dull as its predecessor, “Terminator: Genisys” is still a step back over the first two great movies, and will make most fans wish that the franchise should perish.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

AliceofXJul 21, 2015

Basically bad fan-fiction - that pretty much says it all.

If you can't do an action film with a good story at least have one that doesn't get in the way of the action. Terminator: Genisys does the cardinal sin here. Instead of being merelyBasically bad fan-fiction - that pretty much says it all.

If you can't do an action film with a good story at least have one that doesn't get in the way of the action. Terminator: Genisys does the cardinal sin here. Instead of being merely forgettable the story actually makes you stop and think - wait, this makes no sense. So you can't even enjoy it as a dumb popcorn flick.

There were some genuinely funny bits in this film, but as I write this merely a day after having seen Terminator: Genisys there is nothing memorable that sticks to my mind. With a 26% score on Rotten Tomatoes I expected it would have at least something in the film to hate and rant about it but the film is entirely forgettable.

Other reviewers have remarked that Arnold Schwarzenegger was the best part of the movie and I would have to agree with that opinion. Here he was a lot more interesting than in Terminator 3 and if you are a fan of that character you might be interested in seeing this film. But for fans of the Terminator series I would not recommend this film. Especially if you, like me, loved the second film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

JohnMasterLJul 13, 2015

Pobre James Cameron, Genisys no es solo tediosa, sino también confusa, aburrida y poco llamativa. La trama es tan incongruente que destruye por completo la historia de Terminator y Terminator 2, forzando una historia "nueva" para crear unaPobre James Cameron, Genisys no es solo tediosa, sino también confusa, aburrida y poco llamativa. La trama es tan incongruente que destruye por completo la historia de Terminator y Terminator 2, forzando una historia "nueva" para crear una trilogía. Obvio que si la película es mala, el guion lo es, los diálogos son absurdos y poco entendibles, las secuencias de acción son monótonas, los efectos especiales son lo "poco destacable" aunque no es lo mejor en efectos especiales, las escenas se ven bien. Las actuaciones son decentes (Emilia Clarke hizo lo que pudo, estuvo bien, aunque no pudo con la original sarah Connor) y Arnold Schwarzenegger puede presumir que ya tiene lo necesario para formar parte de "Los Vengadores" (chistes ridículos y diálogos estúpidos) En general, Terminator Genisys es solo una película palomera y ya, no esta al nivel de Mad Max: Fury Road o Jurassic World, recomiendo verla en formato DVD o Blu-Ray si es que tienen la curiosidad de verla.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

michael1208Jul 4, 2015

It's a great welcome to see Arnold Schwarzenegger back into real actions after so many guest appearances in other films but the main idea of the overall film leaves an impression of manipulating the time-travelling in X-Men: Days of FutureIt's a great welcome to see Arnold Schwarzenegger back into real actions after so many guest appearances in other films but the main idea of the overall film leaves an impression of manipulating the time-travelling in X-Men: Days of Future Past, solely an easy way to reboot the entire franchise without a proper story line. Less darker than the other four installments, several twists are easily predicted and there is obviously a number of flaws and time paradox when the story progresses but the film is still an entertaining generic sci-fi. The scores of the film composed by Lorne Balfe are rather weak even though co-produced by Hans Zimmer, the performance of Jai Courtney as Kyle Reese is just alright, Arnold as T-800 is still the most entertaining element of the franchise with his fights and adorable robotic expressions but the pacing of the script has caused the lack of emotional engagement with Sarah Conner (Emilia Clarke). James Cameron says that this film is respectful to his first two installments back in 1984 and 1991 but action sequences are nothing new, CGIs do not improve much from previous installments and the visual effects seems a bit video game setting have overall disgraced his compliment.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

MoneyMaker101Mar 7, 2016

I said it before and Im gonna say it **** MOVIE CRITICS!Not everything they say is right,for Christ sake,Metacritic gave Predator like 3/10 rating and that movie is a Classic with a capital C!This movie is far far better than that piece ofI said it before and Im gonna say it **** MOVIE CRITICS!Not everything they say is right,for Christ sake,Metacritic gave Predator like 3/10 rating and that movie is a Classic with a capital C!This movie is far far better than that piece of **** salvation its not even up for a debate and yeah its far better than the third one Rise of the Machines which I kinda liked tbh its not that bad.Genisys offers you practically everything.There are many funny scenes like the one when Sarah,Kyle and almighty Arnold get caught on the bridge by a police and that police dude says Arnold to get down on his knees lmao and when they have taken their mug shots and that bad boys song comes on,Arnold grins and Sarah is too short for a mug shot.HILARIOUS!And when Arnie tells Sarah and Kyle almost at the end of the movie how he worked in Skynet as an employee but he got fired,after he says he got fired he crushes the door and that gives you an answer why he got fired lmao that was funny as **** movie has nice emotional scenes wih Sarah and Arnold too bad they didnt show more scenes of Arnold and Sarah in their beginnings when she was a kid,their moments…Some action scenes were meh but only like two,first one when that t1000 is driving to the truck and instead Kyle uses that m203 grenade launcher immediately he keeps on shooting at t1000 with bullets,that was kinda weird but ok.And maybe that bus scene was too exaggerating.J.K Simmons did his job but he should have been more on screen and given more character history…Effects were great and at one scene you thought you were watching Star Trek or something.The movie IMO is 8/10 but the lowest rating should be something like 6.5/10 or 7.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Movi3R3vi3werJul 2, 2015

I've been **** talking this movie for the longest time now, ever since the first trailer dropped and I'm not going to lie, I actually somewhat enjoyed it! Is it a good movie? No. It's nothing more than a big dumb action movie. Arnold is atI've been **** talking this movie for the longest time now, ever since the first trailer dropped and I'm not going to lie, I actually somewhat enjoyed it! Is it a good movie? No. It's nothing more than a big dumb action movie. Arnold is at his best in years and JK Simmons does get a few good moments but the rest of the cast don't ever get a moment to shine and it overall comes off as a Terminator wannabe. But if the trailers hadn't spoiled every single plot point or action scene I would have enjoyed it more.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

5

MattBrady99Jul 4, 2015

He's back...almost.

Terminator: Genisys takes place in the year 2029, John Connor leads the resistance of man against Skynet and an army of machines, but as he readies a plan to save the past from this devastating future - Skynet rewritesHe's back...almost.

Terminator: Genisys takes place in the year 2029, John Connor leads the resistance of man against Skynet and an army of machines, but as he readies a plan to save the past from this devastating future - Skynet rewrites history with their own plan - one that targets Connor in the past and present - and he may not be able to survive an assault on both fronts.

I had my doubts with Genisys ever since the title of the movie "Genisys" wasn't such a great title and the fact that the teaser trailer for the movie gave away the biggest plot twist in the movie, I mean the trailer showed way too much and spoiled the film for me. The other thing that made me less exciting for the movie is the fact that movie is saying that the first and second movie never happened and this is the true Terminator movie, f**k this I thought. My hope for this movie for being decent slowly went down as every time I hear some news from the movie is it's something to do with the cast or the little plot rumors.

But after seeing the movie it isn't all that terrible as I thought it was going to be, but it's not great.

Arnold Schwarzenegger returns as are favorite robot bad-ass and he brought he's one liners. Arnold is the most likable bad actor of all time and his slowly turning into an action hero icon. In this movie he once again nails it as the fearless but likable Terminator. I can't imagine anyone else playing the Terminator but only Arnold because it's the right role for him because well Arnold can play a robot really well and he's not even acting. Awesome work Arnold.

T-1000 is back in this movie but not for very long and it did feel out of place for T-1000 to be there, it like the film makers just threw him in there to remind you of T2, but I got to say that the run time of his screen time is the most enjoyable part of this movie. What the movie did well is making the T-1000 scary and dangerous again just like in T2, I mean T-1000 is the best villain in movie history and I'm happy they didn't screw the character up. Now after thinking about it and I did enjoy the T-1000 in the movie, but I have to admit the T-1000 didn't really need to be in this movie, I mean he's screen is very short and he wasn't very useful to the story; he was just throw there just to start the next action screen. If they just cut him out of the movie it wouldn't have made no difference at all and it wouldn't really effect the story. Now to those who haven't seen the movie and wondering why the T-1000 is in the movie well it's because I guesting he's been hunting down Sarah Conner maybe? but in the movie you first see the T-1000 designed up as a police officer driving around the dark streets like most officers do when it's night time to protect the streets at night, but anywhere he came across Kyle Reese as he steals a homeless mans cloths. Anyone remember in the original when Kyle was chase by that police officer in the opening well here it's changed because Kyle knocks him over and ask what year is is and T-1000 attacks him just like that. Okay here's the thing how did it know it's him? I mean you could think they sent another one back in time to hunt both of them down, but Skynet doesn't know that Kyle Reese is the father of John Conner or even know what he looks. I mean if it's been waiting how did it know that's the spot he's going to jumped off at, what if Kyle landed somewhere else? I know I went there and it may seem pointless to some but I seriously needed to get that out there somehow. Some people tell me to just enjoy the movie and don't think about stuff like that, well that's want some lazy moviegoers say just because they can't think themselves.

The one last thing that I can say positive about this movie is the fact that it's much better then Terminator 3. Now I don't hate this movie, I actually think it's a okay movie now keep that in mind, but now I'm getting into the problems and it's going to sound like I'm hating on this movie but keep in mind this is the stuff that bugged and why it bugged me.

Now I got nothing against Jai Courtney, I bet he's a nice guy in real life, but he is seriously not a good actor at all and him playing Kyle Reese was a huge miscast. At times I kept thinking he was a robot because of how robotic and wooden he was as a actor. I really don't get why he's getting such big roles in big movies, I mean the guy is not good at all.

Now another miscast was Emilia Clarke as Sarah Conner. She didn't do a terrible performance such as Jai Courtney, but all of her senses were quite cringe worthy and really awkward. There were scenes in this movie were Emilia almost did a good Sarah Conner but those scenes don't really last long. She's good in Game of Thrones but here she didn't really wow me in her performance.

The story and the writing were pretty messy. I mean this movie tries to improve things with the Terminator timeline by filling in the plot holes and the gaps, but it made things a lot worse and more confusing as this movie as more plot holes then the other Terminator movies. The movie is trying to redone the first and second movie by saying it never happened as the timeline as changed, but the real question is why change the first movie and the squeal? Leave those two movies alone. Why can't they do a Day of Future Past on Terminator 3, I would have been fine with that and it would have been a sorry letter to the fans of last two movies, but changing 1&2...no.

The actions scenes in the movie were fine and entertaining enough, but it didn't really wow me that much. It's mostly quick cuts and some of the action has been shown too much in the trailer so I wasn't all that trilled to see them as every clip and trailer showed most of the action scenes. The action isn't terrible but it was decent.

They where scenes in the movie were the re-create some scenes from the 1984 Terminator movie and it didn't really feel right. It felt weird and not the good weird.

Oh and Matt smith is in the movie...for six minutes and that's it.

Overall Terminator: Genisys has it's pros and it's cons. I say it's better than Terminator 3 but Terminator 2 still knocks this movie out of the park and still will be the classic 90's action film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

FarhanFirozOct 2, 2015

I was very much disappointed with the movie. This is second worst in the franchise. The storyline is completely with plot holes and there is no chance that they can make any changes to it in the next installments.The VFX looks like PS4.I was very much disappointed with the movie. This is second worst in the franchise. The storyline is completely with plot holes and there is no chance that they can make any changes to it in the next installments.The VFX looks like PS4. Emilia Clark as Sarah Connor was a bad impression on Linda Hamilton's character.The VFX of T-1000 looks no different and nit advanced and looks same as T2 which was almost 20 years back! The humour was so bad at this movie. Jai Courtney did a terrible job being Kyle Reese. He had no expressions on his face. On the other hand there were some positive aspects to it too. Arnold was the best thing in the whole movie. Jk Simmons character had a good potential and was wasted. The war scenes looked great better than salvation. Matt smith's character was really interesting but didn't show enough. The action scenes were sort off entertaining.

In the end terminator genisys is an another wasted opportunity . People who haven't seen 1and 2 will definitely love the movie. As of the hard core fans of T1 and T2 we just have to wait for a few more years for James Cameron to get the rights back.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

ZSAndrewClaySZJul 4, 2015

As a true Terminator fan, having seen each movie and the 3D show at Universal, I can say this movie is average. This movie doesn't tread along the lines of mediocre, yet it lacks what made Terminator so good. It feels as though it was made byAs a true Terminator fan, having seen each movie and the 3D show at Universal, I can say this movie is average. This movie doesn't tread along the lines of mediocre, yet it lacks what made Terminator so good. It feels as though it was made by Michael Bay. Too much explosions and action to make it what made Judgment Day the best. The CGI was definitely worthy and good. Bad at some moments during action sequences, but overall it was brilliant. Yet it ruined the movie a slight, because it gave the movie less of a real feeling. The helicopter flying was obviously CGI and in Judgment Day, the helicopter flying was REAL. That's what made those scenes so good, was the fact it was REAL.
The story just screwed everything up, adding an alternate timeline. It messed up the ages, dates, and events. It pretend as though Rise of the Machines and Salvation never happened. There was plot holes here and there, many things weren't fully explained. The whole alternate future part of the movie overstayed its welcome. The movie dragged out too long. It would've been better to enhance the story and make it longer, then split it into a part 1 and a part 2. It felt rushed along to fit everything in.
The casting I felt was average. They did good for Sarah Connor and of course having Arnie return. Kyle Reese and the T-1000 weren't the best of choices. John Connor was good the 2nd half of the movie and gave off a lame vibe the 1st half. None were bad actors to say, but they didn't fit the roll that well. Kyle Reese looked nothing like Michael Bien. And well John Connor looks different all the time, but the actor didn't fit the roll.
I found myself shaking my head at some decisions they made during the film. Such as the ending and some parts near the ending. It got excessive with the choices they made, like "Did they seriously do that?" The comedic elements was actually surprisingly good. No one liners to make history, but the jokes were easy to find and laughable.
I went into this movie with low expectations. I came out satisfied, and I find it a worthy entry into the Terminator franchise. It sets up a sequel following this movie, and that's something I don't like. Maybe they will clear up some plot holes, I don't know. But overall I would recommend this movie and I will go and watch it again. It is average, but honestly it really isn't a waste of time. This movie deserves more than the critics are giving it. Don't believe those that rate it horribly and say it isn't a good movie. Cause it really is good, I will defend it till the end.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

PriddyJul 9, 2015

IMHO -> nothing special. Good special effects, but simple story and horrible John Connor and Kyle Reese destroyed that movie. Waste of time. Unfortunately.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

DevilsndadetailJul 30, 2015

If everyone looks as buff and quaffed as these post nuke guys then I can't wait for the bombs to fall.
Radiation sickness, a Thousand years of Fallut, and deadly contaminated water aside, it's hard to feel as though any of Connors troopsIf everyone looks as buff and quaffed as these post nuke guys then I can't wait for the bombs to fall.
Radiation sickness, a Thousand years of Fallut, and deadly contaminated water aside, it's hard to feel as though any of Connors troops have seen a hard days work as they stand around in their designer leathers and flash perfect teeth zapping their lazer guns now and then.
1983 was a VERY long time ago but the thrilling low budget grainy video of The Terminator seems light years ahead of this 2015 Grandpa terminator played for laughs and cheap cgi.
A laughably bad script, wooden acting so bad that old Arnie isn't the worst actor for a change, and pitiful tv style sets.......
Not much else to say.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

JPKJul 1, 2019

Worst Of The Franchise So Far
Genisys was supposed to be at least decent, But it instead ends up being worse than Salvation.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

SchroederRockNov 24, 2015

Genisys offers some attempts at stretching the story and modernizing the Terminator series in a way that had never fully been realized before. Salvation will feel like a distant memory here as the darker post-apocalyptic feel has been tradedGenisys offers some attempts at stretching the story and modernizing the Terminator series in a way that had never fully been realized before. Salvation will feel like a distant memory here as the darker post-apocalyptic feel has been traded in for a more modern-day action flick. While it has its moments of fun action, I couldn't help but feel like Genisys is trying too hard to be an Avengers movie that effortlessly channels moments of humor and cleverness into the potential end-of-the-world giant that is the story. On top of that, the seriousness rarely felt that serious. Partially because of the writing, partially because of the casting. Arnold is fine, but the casting choices for John Conner and Reese seem wrong in hind-sight. Neither quite fit into their role, making me wonder why the director and casting crew felt compelled to move forward with both. There are missed opportunities within the expanded story as well - the new face of Skynet offered such a fantastic opportunity to make Terminator more than just a bit of nostalgia. This could have been more on the level of Inception, but it isn't. Alas, Genisys is just another cog in the wheel that is a franchise that has really shown its age. Terminator 3 may stand as the weakest of the movies to some, but Genisys isn't all that much better (if at all). Should they find reason to make another one, they'll have a helluva lot of rubble to dig through to clear the name. Perhaps it would be better if they left it alone?… Expand