Paramount Pictures | Release Date: June 4, 1982
8.4
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 184 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
160
Mixed:
16
Negative:
8
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
DollisJun 8, 2013
I like more Star Trek: The Motion Picture because the story is weird ,and i like strange story's the j.j abrams star trek movies ,it has so many action in it.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
Jpz38_HetzerDec 1, 2013
Honestly, this movie wasn't great. Most of the acting is unwatchabley bad. Some of the set up was boreing. The only good part was when khan's ship was tearing up the enterprise.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
ZerpnosMar 5, 2017
Star Trek macerasının ikinci filmi olan Khan filmi benim açımdan yine beklentileri karşılayamayan bir yapım olmuş. Aksiyon katmaya çalışmışlar fakat görseller ve karakterler gerçekten kötü. Bu da seyir zevkini oldukça düşürüyor veStar Trek macerasının ikinci filmi olan Khan filmi benim açımdan yine beklentileri karşılayamayan bir yapım olmuş. Aksiyon katmaya çalışmışlar fakat görseller ve karakterler gerçekten kötü. Bu da seyir zevkini oldukça düşürüyor ve iğrendiriyor. Beğenmedim! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
amheretojudgeJun 26, 2018
encourages the enraging behavior..

Star Trek : The Wrath Of Khan The primary reason why the feature is still loved and buzzed for, is that it ages well and the scrutiny in here focuses more on the simplicity of the emotion that is revenge,
encourages the enraging behavior..

Star Trek : The Wrath Of Khan

The primary reason why the feature is still loved and buzzed for, is that it ages well and the scrutiny in here focuses more on the simplicity of the emotion that is revenge, and keeps it more humane going man-to-man and street methods; it is more grounded. It is short on technical aspects like visual effects, sound department, production design, costume design and editing. The script has a lot of crispness in it to make it to screen and offer the audience the essential cinematic experience but what it lacks is enough concrete material to feed the audience for its almost two hours. Nicholas Meyers; the screenwriter-director, has got the appropriate vision and even though he fails to execute it as anticipated, the impact makes it worth the effort and time in here. The performance is plausible in here especially by the newer member Khan played by Ricardo Monatalbam and stayed true to their return roles by William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy and Deforest Kelly as a supporting cast. Star Trek : The Wrath Of Khan encourages the enraging behavior and allows the audience to shift on definite answers through moral complications and nail-biting dramatic sequences.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
liamexeOct 10, 2022
I believe that this film is marginally superior to the first. It gets off to a better start, with some action right away. Soon after, it slows down a little, but it still isn't as monotonous as number one. Both the speed and the writing, inI believe that this film is marginally superior to the first. It gets off to a better start, with some action right away. Soon after, it slows down a little, but it still isn't as monotonous as number one. Both the speed and the writing, in my opinion, are better. More intriguing is the conversation. This one has a more complex plot and a clearly defined antagonist. This one has a little more suspense and thrill than the previous, which I found missing. Additionally, the characters in this one have a lot more to accomplish. However, I do believe that the last 30 minutes or so kind of drag. Although I think this one is better than the original, there is undoubtedly potential for development. It is still not all that good. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews