Spotlight

8

trexJan 14, 2016

The only truly good and important feature film I've seen this year. Far from perfect, but solid writing and acting and a story that needs to be heard and paid attention to.

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

8

SpangleNov 25, 2015

The second best journalism-based film ever made after All the President's Men, Spotlight is a brilliant work that brings tension, drama, and true hardcore emotion, to a very sensitive topic that it handles gracefully. Director Tom McCarthyThe second best journalism-based film ever made after All the President's Men, Spotlight is a brilliant work that brings tension, drama, and true hardcore emotion, to a very sensitive topic that it handles gracefully. Director Tom McCarthy does not shy away from the hard-hitting and tough to listen to facts that surround this case. The acting here is phenomenal. Michael Keaton, Mark Ruffalo, Rachel McAdams, Liev Schreiber, John Slattery, Billy Crudup, Stanley Tucci, Brian d'Arcy James, Neal Huff, Paul Guilfoyle, Len Cariou, and the list goes on. Everybody who had any single line in this film was great. This film is built around the powerful performances delivered by these talented people and the passion their real life counterparts brought to their job, which really shines through. This film has power in spades and as the onion is peeled back, you are left stunned at this true story. A film that makes you overwhelmed and needing a long bath to try and cleanse all the grime of the world off of you, Spotlight is a great work that deserves all of its forthcoming accolades.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

8

LeZeeFeb 24, 2016

Uncovering the sins committed by whom the millions of people believe in.

A documentary film would show the real faces of those offenders to shame them. That's the reason I desperately wanted it to be a documentary, then I would haveUncovering the sins committed by whom the millions of people believe in.

A documentary film would show the real faces of those offenders to shame them. That's the reason I desperately wanted it to be a documentary, then I would have definitely given a maximum mark. There's no complaint about this movie, but adaptation means fakes acting, fake settings and awards goes to non real achievers. Anyway, this movie kind looked a semi documentary and liked the way it was made.

The movie exposed a very important scandal. If something is open for a debate in the US means, the rest of the world would follow the same route. That's where this theme was inspired by. It all begins with a group of journalists from the Boston Globe with their new editor instruct them to research on sexual abuse of children by priests. So their lead only gets bigger and puts them to recover more evidence in order to publish. How they come up with the story that shake up not only the nation, but the entire world is the remaining.

A collection of bunch fine performances. There's no lead actors in this. Everyone is in the supporting roles. Out of 6, it got nominated both male and female in the category of supporting role for the Academy Awards. I am very disappointed, Mark Ruffalo's performance in 'Infinitely Polar Bear' deserved another nominee. Anyway, this 15 year old story still looks a hot topic. It was a great comeback for the director after critics assaulted him with their words for his previous film 'The Cobbler' only to show their rage on Sandler. It is a must-must see. Beware, is is not your weekend entertainer, but based on the real.

8/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TrilobiteGJul 14, 2016

Spotlight I recommend you check out (Although the majority of you already have I can assume. It is a cold film about the long complicated road of 'doing the right thing'.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Brent_MarchantNov 22, 2015

A generally effective though sometimes plodding chronicle of how Spotlight, the Boston Globe's investigative reporting unit, exposed the Catholic Church's coordinated coverup of the child abuse activities of priests around the world. After aA generally effective though sometimes plodding chronicle of how Spotlight, the Boston Globe's investigative reporting unit, exposed the Catholic Church's coordinated coverup of the child abuse activities of priests around the world. After a painfully slow opening 30 minutes, the film takes off, working best when the Spotlight reporters are out in the field, interviewing sources and uncovering leads. The picture's capable ensemble delivers with earnest, committed sincerity, despite a dearth of meaningful character development. Because of its powerful message, this is bound to be a strong awards season contender for sure.… Expand

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

8

ydnar4Dec 25, 2015

Spotlight is one of the most interesting films of 2015. Spotlight is a film that has gone somewhat under the radar so far but will surely gain some attention around Oscar time. This may even be a potential Best Picture film. The cast inSpotlight is one of the most interesting films of 2015. Spotlight is a film that has gone somewhat under the radar so far but will surely gain some attention around Oscar time. This may even be a potential Best Picture film. The cast in Spotlight will be what draws you in. With stars like Mark Ruffalo, Michael Keaton and Rachel McAdams involved its hard to ignore. Spotlight is the story of a Boston Globe crew who looks to uncover the cases of child abuse by the catholic priests. For a film that deals with such heavy subject matter it does very little to boast itself up. The crew of reporters are merely doing their job so they really do not get over dramatic or really appear to be telling a biased story.

Tom McCarthy has just made a complete 180 with this movie. It has only been a year since the Cobbler, one of my personal least favorite films of all time let alone the year. He redeems himself with this true treasure. I love a good comeback

Now the cast is excellent although there is really not any that truly stand out. The ensemble really works well for this story, but I'll be shocked if we see Oscar nominations for these actors because there is no one who really takes the lead. Mark Ruffalo has truly done everything this year. He's been comedic with Infinitely Polar Bear. He's been a box office draw with Avengers: Age of Ultron and he may be the only actor in the film that gets Oscar consideration. To me he was the stand out. Michael Keaton shows that his comeback role in Birdman was no fluke. Not only is Keaton back but he is better than ever. Then you have Rachel McAdams who shows some dramatic chops and it seems like she becomes more and more dependable as her career continues. Liev Schreiber plays the new editor for the Boston Globe and I thought he was excellent. I can only wish that he had a heavier involvement because I think that it was the best that I have ever seen from him.

Spotlight is a film that needed to be made and now the world just needs to realise that it needs to watch it.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

NerdConsultantJan 31, 2016

I thought Spotlight was a really good film. It takes a very difficult subject matter and handles it very well. I think it could have gone one step further with it, but by the end it does feel like a very good movie. To borrow a quote fromI thought Spotlight was a really good film. It takes a very difficult subject matter and handles it very well. I think it could have gone one step further with it, but by the end it does feel like a very good movie. To borrow a quote from Kyle Kallgren from Brows Held High, the bravery showing the film is not the reporters breaking the story, but it’s the holding on of the story until they have all the facts straight so that they can really make a difference and I don’t think I could sum it up better myself, hence my borrowing that quote. It’s very well acted and its a decently written film. It has a couple of issues, particularly with it’s early pacing and it does feel a bit too much like it’s deliberately aiming for an Oscar, but it’s a lot better than many other films that fit that category. It’s a really good drama, however I wouldn’t recommend rushing to the cinema to see this one, you might want to wait for this one to come out on DVD. It’s just good, that’s what I would say. I’m not sure I would give it the Oscar for best picture, which I don’t suspect it will win, the bookies are predicting The Revenant at this point and they are probably right, but I wouldn’t mind if this one stole it on the day.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

The__ShowmanJan 21, 2016

'Spotlight' A backstory in investigative point of view of the journalists aiming their weapons on the Boston clergy. This movie is highly appreciative for its written work. Kudos to Tom McCarthy and Josh Singer who provided a very interesting'Spotlight' A backstory in investigative point of view of the journalists aiming their weapons on the Boston clergy. This movie is highly appreciative for its written work. Kudos to Tom McCarthy and Josh Singer who provided a very interesting screenplay. Initially, it is slightly boring with random dialogues and same old uninteresting direction and camera work, but as the time passes one can get highly involved in the movie due to its arresting screenplay and top notch performance from all the actors namely Mark Ruffalo, Michael Keaton, Rachel McAdams, Liev Schreiber, John Slattery and Stanley Tucci. Music by Howard Shore is pleasant and also cinematography, editing and production design etc is up to the mark. Keeping all the controversies aside, it is one of the top three best movies of 2015. I predict this movie is going win Oscar for its original screenplay. So don't miss this...… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

hotfromcauldronNov 24, 2015

Spotlight soars as a docudrama with it’s compelling subject matter and strong cast. It is informative and infuriating and forces you to face some harsh truths as it unfolds. Using the cloth of God the troubled youth are preyed upon insteadSpotlight soars as a docudrama with it’s compelling subject matter and strong cast. It is informative and infuriating and forces you to face some harsh truths as it unfolds. Using the cloth of God the troubled youth are preyed upon instead of prayed for. A weakness of this genre to me is the lack of character development. But Mark Rufallo inhibits his role - hands nestled in his pockets- thumbs twitching- he is the heart, soul and drive of this film.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

avan1976Feb 27, 2016

Well made and well acted movie about sexual abuse in the Catholic church in Boston. It is both informative and shocking. However, as a movie, it moves along at a single pace, slowly revealing the story of how the abuse was uncovered, which isWell made and well acted movie about sexual abuse in the Catholic church in Boston. It is both informative and shocking. However, as a movie, it moves along at a single pace, slowly revealing the story of how the abuse was uncovered, which is not such a big deal given this is how journalism work. However, the one knock on this film is that it lacks dramatic climaxes and anti-climaxes and a strong sense of urgency, especially towards the end.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

Braquiador55Feb 6, 2016

Really good insight on a very worrying problem of our soceity, not a masterpiece but a really competent movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

roadwarrior234Feb 8, 2016

Spotlight is shocking and engaging. The whole cast is bringing everything to the table here, especially Mark Ruffalo who had a great performance. This movie is sad and tragic but needed. Spotlight is a great movie.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

RvwFromUpHereJan 20, 2016

Who: Mark Ruffalo, Birdman, Roger Sterling, and the girl detective from the terrible season of True Detective as Sacha Pfeiffer
What: A much cooler movie than anything I watched in 8 years of Catholic school
Where: Boston, MA; 272 yearsWho: Mark Ruffalo, Birdman, Roger Sterling, and the girl detective from the terrible season of True Detective as Sacha Pfeiffer
What: A much cooler movie than anything I watched in 8 years of Catholic school
Where: Boston, MA; 272 years before the events of Fallout 4
When (Can I watch again): When you want to annoyingly convince everyone all Catholics are evil, or when you want to annoyingly convince your parents why church "isn't for you"
Why: For better of the worse, this movie is gonna win best picture. You don't wanna be the person who goes to work the day after the Super Bowl not knowing who Left Shark is… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

8

bds92Nov 21, 2015

When I first found out about this movie, I was probably reminded most of "Michael Clayton" or "A Few Good Men." Based on the strength of the actors, and the intense nature of the topic, I expected a thrill ride. Interestingly, you won't findWhen I first found out about this movie, I was probably reminded most of "Michael Clayton" or "A Few Good Men." Based on the strength of the actors, and the intense nature of the topic, I expected a thrill ride. Interestingly, you won't find that here. "Spotlight" is very subdued. It features a Mark Ruffalo performance on par with his work in Begin Again, proving just how versatile he is and how passionate he can be. Michael Keaton is tasteful, graceful, and maybe even a little boring, but in a good way; it's as if his acting career has been completely reinvented after Birdman. Besides those two things, this movie wasn't what I expected it to be. Upon exiting the theater, I remarked this exactly: "It feels like a great story about a great newspaper story about a terrible story." In other words, you might have felt much more suspense if you had read the Boston Globe article back in 2002. I assumed the point of this film was to tell the story that might have been drowned out by the attacks of 9/11, and I was right. With this, the underlying story feels more important than the film, but it is very well done and well acted. I would absolutely go to see it in the theater, but I would manage my expectations somewhat. If it's plot you're banking on, you'll be disappointed. However, if you love film for the aspects that make film great, you'll see a great film by choosing Spotlight.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

YorkManJan 2, 2016

Spotlight is a dramatisation of the Boston Globe newspaper's 'Spotlight' section who, in 2001, began an investigation into the systematic child abuse by Catholic priests in the Boston Diocese going back over a (known) period of 20 years.Spotlight is a dramatisation of the Boston Globe newspaper's 'Spotlight' section who, in 2001, began an investigation into the systematic child abuse by Catholic priests in the Boston Diocese going back over a (known) period of 20 years.
Unravelling the abuse also reveals a huge conspiracy by the Catholic Church (including the current Cardinal) to cover up said abuse by exercising their influence in both political and legal circles, buying off those who were abused and come forward, using gagging orders and confidentiality agreements to make sure the truth never comes to light.

It is a compelling story, well acted and executed, but it's not a flawless movie. It's a film that draws parallels with the 70's Classic, All The President's Men, which also dealt with a massive conspiracy, but this time governmental (leading right up to President Nixon).
This film, unfortunately, doesn't have that amount of punch to it, even if the subject matter is probably even more disturbing. This is mainly because the film pulls punches when dealing with the actual explanations of the abuse itself, and focuses too much on the exposition and not enough on the characters.

I came away wanting to know more, especially about the contents of a set of 'sealed files' which they are eventually able to get hold of a portion, but we're just offered a 45 second summary, and then the reaction that it creates in the Spotlight news office.

Also, the ending is very anticlimactic, especially during the final build-up to, and then the publication of the news story in 2002, finishing with a 'phones ringing off the hook' fade-out.....

I was hoping for much more of an epilogue, so we could see how the events after publication affected the people who we'd been following through the movie. Not just those working for the Globe, but the larger 'co-stars' in the film who had contributed to uncovering the conspiracy and cover up....

Still, it's well worth watching, just don't expect to find it revelatory in any way.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

ASimpleManNov 20, 2015

It's difficult today to grab an audience without special effects or a lot of action, however Spotlight succeeds. The pace of this movie was initially a bit slow and the audience was less than enthusiastic, but as the story enfolded theIt's difficult today to grab an audience without special effects or a lot of action, however Spotlight succeeds. The pace of this movie was initially a bit slow and the audience was less than enthusiastic, but as the story enfolded the audience grew less restless, eventually becoming riveted to the screen. The movie depicts the hunt for a story within its own story, but the significance of whether the struggle to hunt for the facts or whether the facts themselves are more important is not well enough defined. Had better attention been paid to the dilemma of reporting for the sake of truth versus for the sake of sales dollars this movie would have far more merit.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

8

RatedRexJan 7, 2016

An outstanding, albeit somewhat clinical, look at the cover-up of sexual misconduct among some Catholic priests in the Catholic church. The acting, particularly Michael Keaton and Rachel McAdams, is top-notch. The ensemble shows you just howAn outstanding, albeit somewhat clinical, look at the cover-up of sexual misconduct among some Catholic priests in the Catholic church. The acting, particularly Michael Keaton and Rachel McAdams, is top-notch. The ensemble shows you just how good professional actors can be when they have great direction, and are given written material that allows them to showcase their acting skills. This is one of the top ten movies of 2015.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

SrPepeJan 5, 2018

Muy bien hecha, con excelentes actuaciones y un relato increíble que merece ser sabido por todos.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

2016Jun 30, 2016

Spotlight shows us the dark side of the priests, a great movie with arguments to be nominated to the prizes Oscars, but I think that it should not have gained the prize to the best movie

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MasterRileyJul 23, 2016

Spotlight was a really interesting and cool movie. The casting choices are great and the cases explored throughout the film were very interesting. The only real problem I have with the film is how much talking is done and how little is shownSpotlight was a really interesting and cool movie. The casting choices are great and the cases explored throughout the film were very interesting. The only real problem I have with the film is how much talking is done and how little is shown of actual case witnesses and evidence. Most information is told through dialogue rather than shown. Maybe thats just a personal taste. I would still definitely recommend this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JyroJyroAug 6, 2017

Sadly, this true story film highlights how 'doing the right thing' is often the most difficult thing (literally and emotionally). I also have to give credit to the impeccable writing and acting, in particular Michael Keaton & Mark Ruffalo.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SomePersonaJan 18, 2017

Spotlight is well-directed, well-written, and well-acted. The scenes feel like you're really with the journalists, and you're slowly given new information about the story just as the journalists are over time.

If there's anything bad aboutSpotlight is well-directed, well-written, and well-acted. The scenes feel like you're really with the journalists, and you're slowly given new information about the story just as the journalists are over time.

If there's anything bad about the movie, it would have to be the score. The score is just BAD. It probably takes half the tension out of each scene it plays in.

But overall this movie's cool. Best film of the year? Nah.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ambermdFeb 21, 2018

This is a high quality film with a brilliant script, detailing the plot perfectly. It has a star studded cast and the topic is very interesting and gripping, although it could have been more entertaining.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

YungKangJun 20, 2018

A better thriller than most thrillers nowadays, the pacing is expertly executed and keeps the audience engaged and riveted all the way through.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

BerikNov 9, 2018

If you can understand the rapid talking and Mark Ruffalo's Acid indused moving, then you'll experience a great movie in spotlight. Simply excellent, i give it an 8/10.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

All_ButTrU4Jan 13, 2022

it should go unsaid that this film is a outstanding adaptation of a world breaking scandal. a scandal that exposes the violence of religious leaders ideation and the vulnerability of the youngest children around them. unfurling realisticallyit should go unsaid that this film is a outstanding adaptation of a world breaking scandal. a scandal that exposes the violence of religious leaders ideation and the vulnerability of the youngest children around them. unfurling realistically through seemingly mundane but undoubtedly powerful performances from the star studded cast a very important story is given an essential retelling.one every one should see.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

BrunoVn00May 30, 2020

So, not gonna lie, I liked this movie. I think the acting is great (I loved Mark Ruffalo in this, he's hilarious). I think it's well shot. The story is interesting and I don't feel there was something missing or something that could've beenSo, not gonna lie, I liked this movie. I think the acting is great (I loved Mark Ruffalo in this, he's hilarious). I think it's well shot. The story is interesting and I don't feel there was something missing or something that could've been cut. The dialogue is compelling. When the movie is quiet it doesn't get boring, it's actually interesting and every character interaction is believable. However, something I didn't really like are the characters. This movie has too much characters and it's so hard to keep up with all of them and their names. I hardly remember the characters because they are not really characters but more like plot devices with the sole purpose of moving the story forward. I only remember Mike (Mark Ruffalo's character) because he was pretty charming and quirky and the times I laughed in this film were because of him. The rest of the characters literally act the exact same. I don't know, I would've liked to focus on one character and its journey. It's better to flesh out one character, than having a huge cast of underdeveloped characters.

It's still a good film, but nothing great or exceptional. It didn't deserve Best Picture, tbh.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

A really well made journalism movie. It has an amazing cast and narrates an interesting yet sad story. It makes you feel like you are a reporter.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BHBarryNov 15, 2015

"Spotlight" was co-written by Josh Singer and Thomas McCarthy who also directed the film. It stars Mark Ruffalo, Michael Keaton, John Slattery, Rachel McAdams and Leiv Schrieber (who looks like he should have taken 2 No-Doze pills before his"Spotlight" was co-written by Josh Singer and Thomas McCarthy who also directed the film. It stars Mark Ruffalo, Michael Keaton, John Slattery, Rachel McAdams and Leiv Schrieber (who looks like he should have taken 2 No-Doze pills before his parts were shot).. The film tells the story of the investigative team of reporters on The Boston Globe (called "Spotlight") and how they uncovered the scandal in the Catholic Church involving the molestation and abuse of children by priests and the efforts made to cover up those transgressions by the Church hierarchy. The real "star" of the film is this most interesting story of how an institution so beloved and respected by its community could be made to be held accountable for these unconscionable acts engaged in by its representatives.. With all due respect to the performances of Messrs. Keaton and Ruffalo and Ms. McAdams,, the film takes too long to tell its story and is definitely a "look at my watch" experience. Nevertheless, the importance of the subject matter and the tenacity of those investigating and ultimately writing the story that won their paper a Pulitzer Prize makes it a film worth seeing. I give the film a 7.5 rating because, even after acknowledging its importance, it still remains an entertainment vehicle that should have left at least 20 minutes of it on the editing room floor.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

TVJerryNov 25, 2015

Spotlight is the Boston Globe's team of reporters that specializes in investigative reporting. Their most famous story was about child abuse by Catholic priests and the cover-up by the church. This team (led by Michael Keaton, Mark Ruffalo &Spotlight is the Boston Globe's team of reporters that specializes in investigative reporting. Their most famous story was about child abuse by Catholic priests and the cover-up by the church. This team (led by Michael Keaton, Mark Ruffalo & Rachel McAdams) tenaciously researches and interviews, as they gradually uncover the explosive truth. Even though this is basically a press procedural, the performances are earnest and the writing is rigorous. The tightly-paced drama is in their diligent efforts and intense concern. Director/co-writer Thomas McCarthy (along with Josh Singer) has resisted making the church into threatening villains and overloading the film with emotional confessions, which makes it more a fascinating academic exercise than a moving drama.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

netflicDec 7, 2015

This movie is based on real events, it is about Boston Globe investigation of sexual abuses by Catholic priests, prying on young boys and girls, especially those from troubled families.

I remember the huge scandal that story caused in 2002This movie is based on real events, it is about Boston Globe investigation of sexual abuses by Catholic priests, prying on young boys and girls, especially those from troubled families.

I remember the huge scandal that story caused in 2002 when made public. The story is incredible, and it is the strongest part of the movie. Performance is strong overall. Many critics especially praise Mark Raffalo while to me he looked a bit too much and out of his character. I like him as an actor but not particularly in this movie.

Cinematography, script, music are all quite decent. I completely agree with those who underscore the importance of this movie, since many young people do not know or remember events depicted there. Overall, it is a good movie but not a spectacular one as many critics claim. Nevertheless, I do expect to see this film in the Oscar’s list.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

csw12Dec 27, 2015

Spotlight isn't some groundbreaking film by any means but it is a well paced, strongly acted film that is interesting. The best way to describe Spotlight is a Law and Order SVU episode from the view of journalism instead of law enforcement.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

TheApplegnomeJan 15, 2016

A journalistic fight against morality that, is more than a true & depressing story, its a need to know -- a story that’s well worthy of the Oscars. The realism & intensity of the plot is a stunning trace. It’s like a tense documentary withA journalistic fight against morality that, is more than a true & depressing story, its a need to know -- a story that’s well worthy of the Oscars. The realism & intensity of the plot is a stunning trace. It’s like a tense documentary with these diverse & well visualized characters that, tries to bring this incredible story to life, a story that will bring both suffering and horror to them. It’s a pure dialog-driven film that might be too plot-centric, and due to that fact are characters not given that much playground for any depth nor development. A fact-based drama like this flick isn't for everybody, but it is based on a true story -- just the realism, clever and flawless directing, might bring an Oscar to the ’Spotlight’.

Personal rating: 75/100
Critical rating: 96/100… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

tvnewsguidoJan 1, 2016

Methodical.

I don't know if this is a great movie. It has great acting and a good story but it was more like homework than entertainment. You literally get to watch as a group of reporters methodically (and tediously) put together one ofMethodical.

I don't know if this is a great movie. It has great acting and a good story but it was more like homework than entertainment. You literally get to watch as a group of reporters methodically (and tediously) put together one of the most important stories of the 21st century. I was fascinated throughout but it might read as dull to some less inclined to pick through the details.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

papeadojhonFeb 6, 2016

It may be too harsh and unclear for some, but Spotlight focuses more on its characters as people first before heroes and the result is a well-acted and written film, one of the best that 2015 has to offer.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

GamingNinjaFeb 16, 2016

Overrated movie getting overrated ratings because of fragile subject..
The movie is well acted and told but to praise to this level is nonsense..
It's an above average movie with a lot of dialog and little heart. Worth watching.. Sure.Overrated movie getting overrated ratings because of fragile subject..
The movie is well acted and told but to praise to this level is nonsense..
It's an above average movie with a lot of dialog and little heart.

Worth watching.. Sure. Worth praising..? No.

7.5/10… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

PrashunFeb 25, 2016

I liked this film, thought it was a well done solid film. But I am afraid I can't say anything more than that, it is very documentary like which can be it's biggest strength (a very fact driven plot heavy film) or it's biggest weaknessI liked this film, thought it was a well done solid film. But I am afraid I can't say anything more than that, it is very documentary like which can be it's biggest strength (a very fact driven plot heavy film) or it's biggest weakness (characters feel cold and distant and other than the plot nothing really impresses, also quite a bland in the visuals department). However the characters do start to show some life nearing the end of the film but by that time damage is done it can be hard if not impossible for viewers to differentiate between the reporters for nearly one and a half hour of the film, they all suffer from different faces but same objective syndrome and inadequate effort is made to separate one from the another. Also speaking of run-time, this film is a wee bit over two hours long, editing especially in the first half could have made this film a bit crispier. However I did like the accuracy level in the film regarding the cellphones, ads, electronics and the cars used in 2001; a lot of films these days are becoming very careless in this regard. I would compare it to last year's Foxcatcher another fact driven docu-drama film, solidly acted, but nothing special in the direction, editing and cinematography department, I would still recommend it but no way this film deserves a second watch, you can absorb everything there is to get in a single viewing. All in all, a solid well written docu-drama which will have it's time in the "spotlight" (pun!) this Oscar season and will become "oh that movie about pedo priests" by next year's Oscar season.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

latinodirectorJan 15, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It is interesting that the public give less credit than the "Critics" to this movie. I agree with the public.

Although it is a good movie, once you compared it to "All President's Men" you can feel that something is missing. A movie is not based on the conglomerate of good actors and good settings and a good director. It is the amusing combination of all of them that enchants the receptor. In this case though, it is the topic, and not the movie, what guides the spectator until the end.The topic itself: the gruesome case about those abused victims by sick priests and how the institution -and the society- managed the crime, and how the journal brought it to the light. Was the intention here the film of a crusade? the connection between a strong faith based community and a cruel reality? Was the disapproval of the Catholic Church "as an institution"? I am not so clear. In any case, the silence presence of the victims guide the movie.

I feel that Spotlight fails in one essential point -because of the subjects developed there: missing the opportunity to go deeply into the question of faith and free will. It touched it somehow, yes, but as a small advertising that you could find in any printed newspaper. It does not go there. And faith is for example what drove Rezendes to stop going to Church -no clear explanation why; what Sacha's relatives feel touched -no further inquiry about it; and what it is in the heart of the Bostonian community -no particular discussion about that. Only big names and a big newspaper.

The church is something different than faith, I agree; but if you are going to treat this particular subject as just "the institution" the result is like filming nature without showing wilderness.

Even the history was not well re-scripted; it seems that the journalists are driven by assignment not by guts; and guts is what you need to explore with more anguish as well as impecable touch this case to be considered an excellent movie. Also, I could not detached myself the entire movie from recognizing director's influences rather than an creative opera, it was like watching "The Social Network" applied to this well deserved better construction.

A good movie, not an excellent film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

BenTheBrownieDec 9, 2015

I personally didn't like this movie as much as everyone else. I'm not saying I absolutely hated the movie and I know some fan boys will see this and get extremely mad at my 7/10 rating because I guess all true “Oscar bait” stories are 10/10I personally didn't like this movie as much as everyone else. I'm not saying I absolutely hated the movie and I know some fan boys will see this and get extremely mad at my 7/10 rating because I guess all true “Oscar bait” stories are 10/10 flawless. But, I had flaws with this movie so why would I give it a 10/10? Maybe I'm just that one **** that hates every single movie to ever come out. Anyways, onto the review. First off, the performances of the main cast are phenomenal, they are absolutely phenomenal. Mark Ruffalo, (especially) Micheal Keaton and Racheal McAdams give exceptional performances that will leave you in awe. Those performances also mixed with the chemistry and at time exciting dialogue. I say “at times” because at times the pacing is slow and it seems that at that exact same time that the filler scenes/jokes come in. When I say jokes I legitimately mean jokes. They try to make such a dark tale a comedy to such an extreme extent to where you start to notice the pauses where people were supposed to laugh. In the end, what can I say? It was Oscar Bait but it was Oscar Bait done right.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

CalibMcBoltsMay 30, 2016

''Spotlight'' is one of this years most powerful Oscar movies, with a great ensemble cast, great/powerful story, well-paced. There is not a single dull moment in this fine movie.

Spotlight is the true-story behind the 2002 expose into the''Spotlight'' is one of this years most powerful Oscar movies, with a great ensemble cast, great/powerful story, well-paced. There is not a single dull moment in this fine movie.

Spotlight is the true-story behind the 2002 expose into the Catholic Church's cover-up of decades of sexual abuse and it is unflinching in its focus and animated by its outrage, which is the best and worst part of this awards-caliber movie. Spotlight is a terrifically scripted and performed journal thriller. The actors never seem like they want to overshadow the other, but instead all work towards the common goal of the film's story.
Mark Ruffalo is great while Michael Keaton and Rachel McAdams are decent. The cineomatography is smooth and the editing is tight. The screenplay is terrific and delivers an accurate representation of journalism. However the movie just feels so empty and simplistic. Stanley Tucci and Liev Schreiber are really good in the small amount of screen time they get. Overall while Spotlight is good but it isn't really anything special and failed to give the characters much depth. Not one character in the film apart from Mark Ruffalo's has any development or motivation to do what they do. The whole thing just feels shallow and completely forgettable.
I feel The Revenant was far more deserving of the Best Picture Oscar… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

WigglejigJul 3, 2018

Spotlight is a good movie with an excellent story. It blends together the drama of a newsroom story with the intrigue of a investigative detective flick. It had excellent timing, with details of the plot unfolding just as fast as a viewerSpotlight is a good movie with an excellent story. It blends together the drama of a newsroom story with the intrigue of a investigative detective flick. It had excellent timing, with details of the plot unfolding just as fast as a viewer could want. The movie blended excellent dialogue between characters, as well as emotional moments only accompanied with music, depicting the silent understanding of what the city of Boston knew about these crimes. The parts in the movies were very well acted, with Ruffalo and McAdams doing a wonderful job showing their fear and anger towards the accused. The things I did not like about this movie were the “blah” use of color and symbolism. Even though docudramas do not require artistic color use and symbolism I felt that a movie about the Catholic Church (a group full of symbolism) could have used a splash. The only other real problem I had with the movie was the lack of fear and urgency I felt with the investigation, this movie would have been an excellent documentary, but as a docudrama the drama falls a tad bit flat. I was not worried about the characters, I did not, for a second, think the “villains” had the upper hand, and I certainly was not worried about the Catholic Church retaliating, I was more worried about rival newspapers getting to the story first.
The film is certainly worth the watch, the plot is very attractive, and the subject matter is important, timeless, and dark. The dialogue was good, emotionally charged, and powerful, with the crescendo of Ruffalo's “And people know about it.” The flaws that the film has are merely in presentation and suspense, but it should be noted that it was not written as a suspenseful thriller, but a docudrama.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

carlossolracDec 19, 2018

I'm from Boston and Catholic and read the Boston Globe C2C (cover to cover) like the next guy. I used to like my crackers with wine but man O' man I'll never go to church again. I hope that makes sense. Lightning strikes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AgentLviJun 27, 2023

Decent movie. The story is so --so, scoring is great, visual is decent, and the voice is also great

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Trev29Dec 27, 2015

It is not surprising that critics are going gaga over a movie that 1) bashes the church and 2) is about how important journalists are. The movie is fine, but that is all it is. It is absurd to think that this forgettable, anticlimactic movieIt is not surprising that critics are going gaga over a movie that 1) bashes the church and 2) is about how important journalists are. The movie is fine, but that is all it is. It is absurd to think that this forgettable, anticlimactic movie is a masterpiece. Script, acting, and directing are nothing special.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

nicholasbertMar 4, 2016

During a few moments you get the feeling of the tension actually building up, which then resolves in the same vaguely plain sense of fascination you had before. I would have much rather preferred they focused on the journalism part of itDuring a few moments you get the feeling of the tension actually building up, which then resolves in the same vaguely plain sense of fascination you had before. I would have much rather preferred they focused on the journalism part of it rather than the paedophilia part of it.

A particularly brilliant Mark Ruffalo.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

AxgrinderNov 28, 2015

Warning! Professional reviewers are gushing over Spotlight. This is often a “tell” that a movie isn’t very appealing to large swaths of the general movie-going public, and such is the case here. Despite a good cast, decent acting andWarning! Professional reviewers are gushing over Spotlight. This is often a “tell” that a movie isn’t very appealing to large swaths of the general movie-going public, and such is the case here. Despite a good cast, decent acting and intelligent dialogue, the movie is just plain boring.

Spotlight explains how a small team of investigative reporters at a “local” newspaper (The Boston Globe) uncovered, and eventually reported on, Catholic Priests molesting children in the Boston area. If you’ve read a newspaper in the last 10 years you already know the basic story: Church hierarchy was not only aware of the problem, but had been covering it up for decades. The breaking of the story led to subsequent revelations that the abuse inflicted by these Catholic priests on their parishioners wasn’t an isolated incident limited to the Boston area. It’s a world-wide plague.

It’s almost impossible to be oppugnant of a movie whose subject matter is so poignant. The problem is that Spotlight just isn’t that interesting, unless you are Catholic, a newspaper writer, or from the Boston area. Most of us would expect a movie about such atrocities to answer the basic question, who is responsible? We might also expect a movie in which Good ultimately triumphs over Evil, and the Bad are brought to justice. Spotlight painstakingly avoids the later and the typical Hollywood happy ending.

Instead, the movie is an introspection which attempts to focus on identifying how something so disgusting and so widespread could have gone on for so long. The movie answers this question in an unexpected manner that is the ultimate indictment of Catholic orthodoxy, which seeks to imbue the faithful with a belief that the church is both inherently good and infallible in its decision making (and thus is not to be questioned) and that man, who is born sinful, should feel guilty about everything that he does (or in this case, doesn’t do).

The only real tension in the movie comes when the audience learns that information about priests molesting children was previously sent to the newspaper many years ago, but the newspaper failed to act on it, and that someone may have deliberately buried it. We continually wait for this play out, only to discover in highly anticlimactic fashion that the inaction was probably inadvertent (or maybe subconsciously suppressed and ignored).

We are left with the idea that the catholic community of Boston (which is portrayed as a fiercely prideful and tightknit community) knew or should have known what was going on for all those years and thus, the community bears significant responsible for the decades of delay in stopping the abuse.

While I appreciate the irony that a Catholic community is made up of individuals who, as a result of church teachings, are permeated with a sense of guilt, and thus might blame themselves for not outing their own child molesting priests on a more-timely basis, I didn’t view this movie as involving some grand revelation, I saw it more as a movie about mental self-flagellation.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

6

21gramsJan 11, 2016

The material for the movie was great - a story worth telling, but it was so disappointing.. It felt almost like documentary movie in some sense, but it lacked facts and evidence material. Most actors were flat, Keaton seems back to his ownThe material for the movie was great - a story worth telling, but it was so disappointing.. It felt almost like documentary movie in some sense, but it lacked facts and evidence material. Most actors were flat, Keaton seems back to his own routine after good performance in Birdman last year, McAdams was like always the same and not convincing at all. Only Ruffalo put some good effort into his role. Overall very shallow and boring movie, it doesn't give any value to the viewer from cinematic perspective.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

jrodfilmsNov 18, 2015

the movie is good, but i think you can wait for HBO On Demand, since it has a 'movie of the week' feeling. Good performances, but i didnt think anything was groundbreaking.

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

6

PrimeProjectorsJan 17, 2016

Interesting tid bit, I was a young Catholic boy when these events were taking place (Kind of). Started to fade out a bit when this overarching, all-power, deity can't decide whether gay marriage is a burden on the sanctity of marriage or allInteresting tid bit, I was a young Catholic boy when these events were taking place (Kind of). Started to fade out a bit when this overarching, all-power, deity can't decide whether gay marriage is a burden on the sanctity of marriage or all his children get his love equally. Or if murdering people grants me 15 infinity years on fire, or if I can come to his party bus if I just wish upon a star. Enough about questioning the Catholic religion let's talk about Spotlight. Going in I heard that this movie treated both sides, Catholic and reporters, equally. Also that it doesn't actually make you question the logistics of religion. Either that person was deliberately lying so I'd have a bigger reaction, or he accidentally walked into Alvin and the Chipmunks: Road Chip, without noticing. This film knows how to set up the sensitive subject, it attempts to "fairly" represent the Church's side in the beginning. We start with one incident of sexual assault, or rather the aftermath. It's a short scene and it doesn't show a mother weeping over her victimized child praying for the blood of the Pope, while a priest twists his handle bar mustache. It's just one of the head whatevers, talking to the kids saying the priest will be moved and never seen again. This scene cleverly, and decietfully, shows this as a one-time incident that the church regrets happened. Then we arrive with our main reporters Mike Rezendes (Mark Ruffalo), Walter Robinson (Michael Keaton), Sacha Pfieffer (Rachel McAdams), and Matt Carroll (Brian d'Arcy James) they all work for a reporting group called Spotlight. They are known at covering large stories and getting to the bottom of them. This movie spends a lot of time with these characters, but it's really hard to remember their actual names. Honestly it wouldn't be that ill advised to say these characters mean very little, at least as their personalities are concerned. But that's kind of the point; as they get deeper in they find themselves being completely, and unintentionally surrounded by the disgusting reality of what the church is doing. They are simply representations of the actual spotlight crew that found the truth as been around every person. This films likes doing reveals, appropriately. There are several instances where camera and editing choices reveal the true damage or gravity of this situation. Sometimes a character will just blurt out commentary over the imagery either right away, or late. Spotlight members relationships with other people can also be spelled out too much. Specifically with someone's (trying not to spoil) blood relative.Also when a Cardinal does something dastardly, the film just kind of shrugs it off. Those things hurt the film in my opinion. But this film does certainly do a good job of not saying some things, for example the emotional state of the reporters is tracked very fluently. When a character feels panicked, rushed, angry, or scared you feel the weight because what the film is saying is dramatic, and you've been following the characters emotions the whole time. Those are all the things in the actual writing and directing I really liked, but there is another reason to watch this film. It's subject. Films like these are important things to watch, we can really take away a lot from it. This film could very well piss you off, if you are a devote follower of God. It tells you that the Church is corrupt, has too much power, and is blindly followed. Or at least at this time it was. It's hard to deny the credibility of the film when you see the final statistics on display in the film. It reminds me of two things. One, Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing. I don't think this movie quite utilizes it's full potential like Do the Right Thing, but they both say something that is tough to swallow. They choose to show the world the state it is certainly in. We aren't perfect but we can at least try to do something. The second thing I am reminded of is a quote from Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange. Alex is watching brutal violence, rape, and the Nazi regime and he says "its funny how the colors of the real world, only feel really real when you vivid them on a screen". I think he mean we can only learn from what is in front of us. Well that's it God Bless you.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

6

kaste16Apr 13, 2022

By far the best movie of it's year Spotlight's veteran and talented cast give us an amazing detailed look at one of the biggest church scandals. Gripping and moving for it's entire duration spotlight reminds of how an independent and fearlessBy far the best movie of it's year Spotlight's veteran and talented cast give us an amazing detailed look at one of the biggest church scandals. Gripping and moving for it's entire duration spotlight reminds of how an independent and fearless press now more then ever, is so important.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LightsAndBulbsSep 18, 2022

This film's lack of flair makes it feel more like a Wikipedia entry than a piece of art. The only reason that this movie is compelling is because of the inherently interesting nature of its source material. There is barely anything that theThis film's lack of flair makes it feel more like a Wikipedia entry than a piece of art. The only reason that this movie is compelling is because of the inherently interesting nature of its source material. There is barely anything that the director or actors do to enhance the film, or add flavor to it. It relies too heavily on the viewer's interest in the events it recounts, and it doesn't make any attempt to create further intrigue.
-
Best Performance: Mark Ruffalo… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

zaninifDec 4, 2015

A movie to watch at home if there's nothing else on. You are gonna need multiple breaks while watching it at home - it's kind of boring. The only thing going for this movie is the acting, which is good but unremarkable. Don't waste $13 on this.

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

5

foxgroveFeb 10, 2016

Slow, surprisingly muted and almost overwhelmingly disappointing. This year’s Oscar front runner for best picture deals with The Boston Globe newspaper’s expose of the dirty dealings and hypocrisies of the Catholic Church. More specificallySlow, surprisingly muted and almost overwhelmingly disappointing. This year’s Oscar front runner for best picture deals with The Boston Globe newspaper’s expose of the dirty dealings and hypocrisies of the Catholic Church. More specifically it hones in on the sexual molestation of young boys by Catholic priests. However, despite this controversial hot potato of a subject the film seriously lacks any raw power or urgency. Instead it is content to have its leading investigators amble from meeting to meeting obtaining information rather too easily. Things aren’t helped by the lack of an emotional hook. The victims interviewed are all adults and come across as basic stock characters shouldering all the worst lines of dialogue like ‘Who can say no to god’. Lines like this are so phony that one winces with embarrassment. Anyone who has seen ‘All the President’s Men’ or Netflix’s current ‘Making a Murderer’ will know that films exposing evil or corruption can be nerve jinglingly tense and emotively powerful, but Mark Ruffalo’s annoying depiction of righteous anger just doesn’t cut it. Where the film does succeed is in keeping viewer interest in a subplot as to who in Spotlight’s department was responsible, and therefore complicit, in burying the story years earlier. Performance wise the Oscar nominated turns of both Ruffalo and Rachel McAdams seem quite conventional and uninteresting, whereas the actors in smaller parts; Liev Schreiber, Stanley Tucci, Billy Crudup and John Slattery all fare much better. The ‘Spotlight’, however, does shine on one person; Michael Keaton. For an actor who is often guilty of being way over the top he is here at his most understated. It is more than fair to say that he single handedly elevates ‘Spotlight’ to a level way above the mediocrity of the rest of the film.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

elitefourJan 10, 2016

Spotlight has a very attractive plot but it´s not a gripping portrayed of a controversial story. Many people say this film will be a classic,it´s not. The film doesn´t generate a sensation of fear or danger,there is not threat or a momentSpotlight has a very attractive plot but it´s not a gripping portrayed of a controversial story. Many people say this film will be a classic,it´s not. The film doesn´t generate a sensation of fear or danger,there is not threat or a moment when we can remember,there are no memorable dialogue or enough character development.
I think this film recieve too much praise because it´s simplicity of storytelling and controversial aspect. Tom Mccarthy was very brave,but he didn´t direct a memorable or enjoyable film. It´s very Dry and Joyless.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

AxeTFeb 18, 2016

Straightforward no frills, well acted, investigative journalistic procedural based on true story; heavy on dialogue as you'd expect but short on vigor, suspense, emotional payoffs, and an overall sense of urgency. Sorry but a tough subjectStraightforward no frills, well acted, investigative journalistic procedural based on true story; heavy on dialogue as you'd expect but short on vigor, suspense, emotional payoffs, and an overall sense of urgency. Sorry but a tough subject alone does not grant a pass for great movie. The craftsmanship is solid, though no flair for moviemaking is evident in this only mildly involving story. This same movie aesthetically could have come out in 2001 or in 1970, whether that's a problem or not is not the issue, but the low key to the point of nearly emotionless arch is. It is there however subtle making it more realistic but also less satisfying as movie artifice. It does not deserve Best Picture and is a prime example of serious content alone trumping form. Ruffalo does not deserve the nom any more than every other member of the ensemble, that is besides Rachel McAdams who is a good actress but any of literally hundreds of others could easily play this part to the same effect.
The basic problem with this movie and what most of the worthless dopey critics next door ignore because of their bias and incompetence is it's underwhelming!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

misadventurerJan 1, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Spotlight isn't as good as every seems to make it out to be. it's a feature length episode of Law & Order: SVU, what it does capture well, is the casual racism of Boston. If a character isn't Irish and Catholic by default at least one person per scene, in the case of Stanley Tucci, its himself, will mention the character's race or religion, for no other reason than to question why they care about why the Catholic Church does what it does, and it's a very "outsiders cause trouble" mentality. The performances are uneven, you get solid Keaton and Slattery, but there are no real characters for them, they're the straight men. Ruffalo's accent slips in and out of every scene, but he manages to keep it together for a big scene, standing up to Keaton, but you can't give an award for once scene when the rest of the performance is shoddy (unless its Anne Hathaway singing in a close up). I wanted to like Rachel McAdams more in this, she has a "Your Girl Friday" attitude, but its also because she's effectively the only female character in the entire film. The most interesting performance in the film is from Brian d'Arcy James, you know, that one guy in the movie you probably have no idea who is, with the eyebrows and the mustache, that's in more of the film than Liev Schreiber, who plays the new EIC of the Boston Globe who puts the Spotlight investigative team on the Catholic Molestation case in the first place. The film has a downer ending, and endings for Bio-Pics or based on true events films, are hard, because if you follow the news, generally you know how they're going to end, going in. With this, the article is front page of the Sunday Edition, and the film ends with post script cards telling how more than 1000 victims came forward after the article was written and then lists all the cities around the world where molestation involving the Catholic Church have taken place. The film was produced by Participant Media, which, their mission statement is to make films that matter, and most of their films are quite good, Spotlight came off as a hollow procedural and was almost more montage than narrative.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

AliceofXMar 11, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The problem is that Spotlight is just not that good a film. If you take away the importance of its subject matter there is nothing noteworthy in this. Just a dull, boring movie that made me appreciate The Big Short a lot more.

The Silent Night song part was the worst scene in the film. After the entire movie failed to stir any emotion the film makers go for the old „play a sad song" as if that is a good substitute for a compelling plot.

The actors are good and each plays their part well. But since the plot doesn't really flesh them out they don't have much to do to make their characters more memorable. They come in, do their part and you don't really find out more about them as humans.

Now maybe if I had the opportunity to see this movie before the Oscars, or even the nominations, I could judge this movie more soberly but I can't. With such high achievements you naturally come into the movie theatre expecting something grand but the film just doesn't deliver. Overall Spotlight isn't bad by any means, but the best film of the year?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

SierpinaJan 24, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Sus trailers prometen demasiado, la verdad es que la trama es buena pero pesada, a ratos la película es lenta y las actuaciones brillante no las vi en ningún lado. No debería ganar como mejor película. Discreta… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

Thejudge21Mar 2, 2016

A decent film with a powerfull subject matter, but it should never have been given best film at the oscars. Its no "All the presidents men". So many film critics gave this 100/100.. 90/100. Why? Its got a higher score on here than schindlersA decent film with a powerfull subject matter, but it should never have been given best film at the oscars. Its no "All the presidents men". So many film critics gave this 100/100.. 90/100. Why? Its got a higher score on here than schindlers list, lord of the rings, and many other classic films. It goes to prove one thing. Most of the so called film critics today and the panel at the oscars aint got a clue.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

RobinwoodJan 29, 2023

I enjoyed it but nothing more. The subject was an important one, the hard work of the independent press is admirable, and the casting was excellent but... Overwall it was a bit boring.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

everlarkislifeDec 27, 2015

I saw this movie with my mom and we both agreed that is was bad. It did not grab my attention. I don't really understand why everyone loves this movie. Exposing the Catholic Church has never been so dull. One of the worst movies of the year.

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

3

NBNEMar 4, 2016

Important story, and think this only won Best Picture because of the subject matter. The acting was over the top - of course we are angry - but I felt never felt an emotional connection or outrage through the characters.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

NickJewelJan 23, 2016

I was so disappointed by "Spotlight." I'm usually a HUGE admirer of Ruffalo's work but instead I found his performance one-note and off-putting. I was bored throughout much of the movie. It was formulaic -- absolutely nothing interestingI was so disappointed by "Spotlight." I'm usually a HUGE admirer of Ruffalo's work but instead I found his performance one-note and off-putting. I was bored throughout much of the movie. It was formulaic -- absolutely nothing interesting or engaging in the way it was made. So disappointing because I figured with the Oscar nominations it received, it would be a great film. The one thing that stood out for me was the score, which was (unfortunately) the only thing moving the emotional narrative forward at all. Otherwise, it's one of the most dry, boring films I've seen in ages. I don't recommend it.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

1

cronleeMar 4, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I am giving this low score because this movie bored me to tears. 90% of the screen shots are people working in offices, drinking coffee, carrying laptops around from office to office to restaurant ... reminded me of my days working as an office temp. The subject-matter I think is what got it the Oscar - but the
filming was, in addition to being office-bound, was not distinctive; the score has already been satirized in Burn After Reading (among others); the actors had zero charismal; and the plot was totally cliched [SPOILER ALERT] - down to the shots of the newspaper finally rolling out copies with the truth, which has been around since the 1930s: and actuallly were not that relevant to the post-9/11 era - shots of computer screens downloading the news would have been more a propos. You could have made a much more interesting movie if there had been more screen time devoted to the criminals, the victims, how the victims later organized, the reactions of the Cardinal and the hierarchy to unfolding events -- this fillm won for its good intentions, period. It is basically an unimaginative, tedious, predictable, and cliched work.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

0

MovieMan12Dec 27, 2015

I was really looking forward to this movie especially since many of my favorite actors are in this movie. It turned out to be terrible. So boring. Just wait until it is on TV to see it if you want to.

4 of 52 users found this helpful448

All this user's reviews

0

MaryMaeDec 27, 2015

Spotlight while admirable, fell flat in nearly every department. It was painfully boring with no sense of direction. Not a very good follow up for Micheal Keaton. I expected more.

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

Spotlight

User Reviews